jones
argued
october
decided
march
petitioner
charged
inter
alia
carjacking
violation
time
provided
relevant
person
possessing
firearm
takes
motor
vehicle
person
presence
another
force
violence
intimidation
shall
imprisoned
years
serious
bodily
injury
results
imprisoned
years
death
results
imprisoned
number
years
life
indictment
made
reference
numbered
subsections
charged
none
facts
mentioned
latter
two
petitioner
told
arraignment
faced
maximum
sentence
carjacking
jury
instructions
trial
defined
offense
reference
solely
found
guilty
however
district
imposed
sentence
carjacking
charge
one
victim
suffered
serious
bodily
injury
rejected
petitioner
objection
serious
bodily
injury
element
offense
neither
pleaded
indictment
proven
jury
affirming
ninth
circuit
agreed
set
sentencing
factor
element
independent
offense
held
section
establishes
three
separate
offenses
specification
elements
must
charged
indictment
proven
beyond
reasonable
doubt
submitted
jury
verdict
pp
superficial
impression
subsections
sentencing
provisions
loses
clarity
one
looks
subsections
provide
steeply
higher
penalties
condition
facts
injury
death
seem
quite
important
elements
principal
paragraph
force
violence
intimidation
government
stresses
numbered
subsections
stand
alone
defining
offenses
whose
elements
set
statute
opening
paragraph
integrated
structure
suggests
statute
establishes
single
offense
government
also
argues
numbered
subsections
come
word
shall
often
divides
provisions
specify
sentences
number
countervailing
structural
considerations
however
weaken
points
first
shorter
subsection
stand
alone
neither
voluminous
first
paragraph
merely
describe
obnoxious
behavior
never
actually
telling
reader
crime
numbered
subsections
complete
thought
second
shall
invariably
separate
clauses
sentencing
provisions
section
text
alone
justify
confident
inference
statutory
drafting
however
occurs
backdrop
merely
structural
conventions
varying
significance
traditional
treatment
certain
categories
important
facts
like
degree
injury
victims
relation
particular
crimes
statute
unclear
whether
treats
fact
element
penalty
aggravator
makes
sense
look
statutes
done
since
congress
unlikely
intend
radical
departures
past
practice
without
making
point
saying
see
search
comparable
examples
suggests
congress
separate
aggravated
offenses
mind
employed
numbered
subsections
unmistakably
identified
serious
bodily
injury
related
facts
violence
offense
element
several
federal
statutes
including
two
three
robbery
statutes
modeled
carjacking
statute
conclusion
bolstered
practice
treating
serious
bodily
injury
element
defining
distinct
offense
aggravated
robbery
neither
amendment
statute
statute
legislative
history
supports
government
reading
pp
government
construction
statute
raise
serious
constitutional
question
fifth
amendment
due
process
clause
sixth
amendment
notice
jury
trial
guarantees
jury
determination
waived
may
judicial
factfinding
preponderance
support
application
provision
increases
potential
severity
penalty
variant
given
crime
although
question
recognized
series
cases
past
quarter
century
see
mullaney
wilbur
resolved
cases
see
supra
doubt
issue
statutory
construction
thus
resolved
favor
avoiding
question
rule
statute
susceptible
two
constructions
one
grave
doubtful
constitutional
questions
arise
questions
avoided
duty
adopt
latter
ex
rel
attorney
general
delaware
hudson
pp
reversed
remanded
souter
delivered
opinion
stevens
scalia
thomas
ginsburg
joined
stevens
scalia
filed
concurring
opinions
kennedy
filed
dissenting
opinion
rehnquist
breyer
joined
nathaniel
jones
petitioner
writ
certiorari
appeals
ninth
circuit
march
justice
souter
delivered
opinion
case
turns
whether
federal
carjacking
statute
petitioner
charged
defined
three
distinct
offenses
single
crime
choice
three
maximum
penalties
two
dependent
sentencing
factors
exempt
requirements
charge
jury
verdict
think
better
reading
three
distinct
offenses
particularly
light
rule
interpretive
uncertainty
resolved
avoid
serious
questions
statute
constitutionality
december
petitioner
nathaniel
jones
two
others
oliver
mcmillan
held
two
men
mutanna
mardaie
jones
mcmillan
went
victims
pockets
oliver
stuck
gun
mutanna
left
ear
later
struck
head
oliver
mcmillan
made
getaway
cadillac
jones
driven
scene
jones
forced
mardaie
mutanna
honda
drove
stopping
put
mardaie
jones
sped
away
stolen
car
subject
police
pursuit
ended
jones
crashed
telephone
pole
oliver
tr
july
grand
jury
eastern
district
california
indicted
jones
two
accomplices
two
counts
using
aiding
abetting
use
firearm
relation
crime
violence
violation
carjacking
aiding
abetting
carjacking
violation
read
follows
whoever
possessing
firearm
defined
section
title
takes
motor
vehicle
transported
shipped
received
interstate
foreign
commerce
person
presence
another
force
violence
intimidation
attempts
shall
fined
title
imprisoned
years
serious
bodily
injury
defined
section
title
results
fined
title
imprisoned
years
death
results
fined
title
imprisoned
number
years
life
supp
indictment
made
reference
statute
numbered
subsections
charged
none
facts
mentioned
latter
two
arraignment
magistrate
judge
told
jones
faced
maximum
sentence
years
carjacking
charge
app
consistently
advice
district
subsequent
jury
instructions
defined
elements
subject
government
burden
proof
reference
solely
first
paragraph
mention
serious
bodily
injury
id
jury
found
jones
guilty
counts
case
took
new
turn
however
arrival
presentence
report
recommended
petitioner
sentenced
years
carjacking
one
victims
suffered
serious
bodily
injury
report
noted
mutanna
testified
oliver
gun
caused
profuse
bleeding
mutanna
ear
physician
concluded
mutanna
suffered
perforated
eardrum
numbness
permanent
hearing
loss
id
jones
objected
recommendation
bounds
since
serious
bodily
injury
element
offense
defined
part
neither
pleaded
indictment
proven
jury
app
district
saw
matter
differently
based
finding
serious
bodily
injury
allegation
supported
preponderance
evidence
imposed
sentence
carjacking
count
ibid
together
consecutive
sentence
firearm
offense
like
trial
appeals
read
setting
element
independent
offense
ninth
circuit
thus
agreed
eleventh
see
williams
reasoning
structure
statute
particularly
grammatical
dependence
numbered
subsections
first
paragraph
demonstrated
congress
understanding
subsections
complete
definitions
separate
crimes
view
subsections
provided
sentencing
factors
found
additional
support
statute
legislative
history
heading
subtitle
bill
creating
enhanced
penalties
auto
theft
took
indicating
statute
numbered
subsections
merely
defined
sentencing
enhancements
id
also
noted
several
references
committee
reports
floor
debate
bill
enhanced
penalties
apparently
single
carjacking
offense
ibid
features
arguably
distinguishing
case
granted
certiorari
reverse
ii
much
turns
determination
fact
element
offense
rather
sentencing
consideration
given
elements
must
charged
indictment
submitted
jury
proven
government
beyond
reasonable
doubt
see
hamling
gaudin
accordingly
statutes
come
benefit
provisions
straightforwardly
addressing
distinction
elements
sentencing
factors
see
mcmillan
pennsylvania
express
identification
statutory
provision
sentencing
factor
even
without
help
however
first
glance
look
suggesting
numbered
subsections
sentencing
provisions
begins
principal
paragraph
listing
series
obvious
elements
possession
firearm
taking
motor
vehicle
connection
interstate
commerce
paragraph
comes
close
standing
followed
sentencing
provisions
first
subsection
certainly
adds
element
superficial
impression
loses
clarity
one
looks
penalty
subsections
provide
steeply
higher
penalties
condition
facts
injury
death
seem
quite
important
elements
principal
paragraph
force
violence
intimidation
best
questionable
whether
specification
facts
sufficient
increase
penalty
range
let
alone
years
life
meant
carry
none
process
safeguards
elements
offense
bring
defendant
benefit
look
statute
reliable
guide
congressional
intentions
government
accordingly
advances
two
subtle
structural
arguments
position
fact
specified
subsection
merely
sentencing
factor
like
appeals
government
stresses
statute
numbered
subsections
stand
alone
defining
offenses
whose
elements
anyone
reckoning
set
statute
opening
paragraph
integrated
structure
said
suggest
statute
establishes
single
offense
point
government
argues
numbered
subsections
come
word
shall
often
divides
provisions
specify
sentences
brief
points
sound
enough
far
go
far
short
dispositive
even
terms
whereas
weakened
number
countervailing
structural
considerations
first
petitioner
notes
reply
brief
petitioner
shorter
subsection
stand
alone
neither
section
voluminous
first
paragraph
isolation
merely
describe
obnoxious
behavior
leaving
reader
assuming
must
crime
never
actually
told
numbered
subsidiary
provisions
complete
thought
section
thus
unlike
provisions
federal
criminal
code
genuinely
stand
grammatical
feet
thanks
phrases
shall
unlawful
see
shall
punished
see
shall
guilty
see
supp
ii
draw
provision
close
second
significance
word
shall
although
frequently
separates
clauses
sentencing
provisions
hardly
invariably
one
robbery
statutes
served
model
see
example
places
elements
offense
either
side
shall
course
supposedly
elements
side
grammatically
incomplete
placement
shall
oddly
equivocal
indeed
government
courts
appeals
treat
statute
perhaps
closely
resembling
one
consumer
tampering
defining
basic
aggravated
offenses
one
defined
terms
serious
bodily
injury
see
meling
clues
derived
attention
structure
parsing
wording
like
dissent
holds
distinguish
carjacking
act
robbery
statutes
upon
modeled
state
aggravated
robbery
statutes
see
post
turn
move
us
far
effort
infer
congressional
intent
text
alone
justify
confident
inference
statutory
drafting
occurs
backdrop
merely
structural
conventions
varying
significance
traditional
treatment
certain
categories
important
facts
like
degree
injury
victims
crime
relation
particular
crimes
given
statute
unclear
treating
fact
element
penalty
aggravator
makes
sense
look
statutes
done
fair
assumption
congress
unlikely
intend
radical
departures
past
practice
without
making
point
saying
engaged
enquiry
past
term
stressed
history
treating
recidivism
sentencing
factor
noted
perhaps
one
exception
congress
never
clearly
made
prior
conviction
offense
element
offense
conduct
absence
recidivism
independently
unlawful
contrary
search
comparable
examples
readily
suggests
congress
separate
aggravated
offenses
mind
employed
scheme
numbered
subsections
although
congress
explicitly
treated
serious
bodily
injury
sentencing
factor
see
interstate
violation
protection
order
free
access
clinic
entrances
bodily
injury
unmistakably
identified
serious
bodily
injury
offense
element
number
statutes
see
assault
member
armed
forces
violence
international
airports
genocide
likelihood
congress
understood
injury
offense
element
follows
fact
carjacking
type
robbery
serious
bodily
injury
traditionally
treated
congress
state
legislatures
defining
element
offense
aggravated
robbery
government
acknowledges
brief
congress
modeled
federal
carjacking
statute
several
federal
robbery
statutes
one
robbery
involving
controlled
substances
clearly
makes
causing
serious
bodily
injury
element
offense
provides
hoever
takes
attempts
take
person
presence
another
force
violence
intimidation
certain
controlled
substances
shall
fined
imprisoned
twenty
years
replacement
cost
controlled
substance
less
another
person
killed
suffered
significant
bodily
injury
result
taking
attempt
see
also
second
model
bank
robbery
government
concedes
see
brief
makes
related
facts
violence
assault
jeopardizing
life
using
dangerous
weapon
elements
defining
aggravated
form
type
robbery
see
cf
supra
citing
bank
robbery
statute
example
statute
establishing
greater
lesser
included
offenses
mcmillan
contrasting
provision
defining
sentencing
enhancement
pressed
oral
argument
government
proved
unable
explain
congress
might
chosen
one
treatment
serious
bodily
harm
violence
defining
two
three
offenses
used
models
different
treatment
writing
carjacking
statute
see
tr
oral
arg
unable
imagine
convincing
reason
thus
think
fair
say
earlier
robbery
statutes
carjacking
statute
congress
probably
intended
serious
bodily
injury
element
defining
aggravated
form
crime
state
practice
bolsters
conclusion
many
use
causation
serious
bodily
injury
harm
element
defining
distinct
offense
aggravated
robbery
see
code
robbery
first
degree
defined
part
causing
serious
physical
injury
alaska
stat
ann
ark
code
ann
aggravated
robbery
nflicts
attempts
inflict
death
serious
physical
injury
stat
robbery
first
degree
auses
serious
physical
injury
iowa
code
robbery
first
degree
purposely
inflicts
attempts
inflict
serious
injury
kans
stat
ann
aggravated
robbery
inflicts
bodily
harm
rev
stat
ann
michie
robbery
first
degree
causes
physical
injury
rev
stat
ann
iii
class
felony
robbery
nflicted
attempted
inflict
death
serious
injury
penal
law
mckinney
robbery
first
degree
auses
serious
physical
injury
rev
stat
robbery
first
degree
auses
attempts
cause
serious
physical
injury
tex
penal
code
ann
aggravated
robbery
causes
serious
bodily
injury
utah
code
ann
aggravated
robbery
causes
serious
bodily
injury
rev
code
robbery
first
degree
nflicts
bodily
injury
state
practice
admittedly
direct
authority
reading
federal
carjacking
statute
show
treating
serious
bodily
injury
element
congress
treading
path
despite
indications
equivocal
structural
clues
government
suggests
amendment
supports
reading
carjacking
statute
previously
enacted
carjacking
correction
act
stat
congress
provided
term
serious
bodily
injury
subsection
include
sexual
abuse
aggravated
sexual
abuse
defined
government
points
several
statements
amendment
legislative
history
subsection
described
providing
penalty
enhancement
see
pp
showing
subsection
defines
sentencing
factor
even
us
disposed
treat
legislative
history
authority
however
find
quoted
statements
unimpressive
assuming
penalty
enhancement
meant
synonymous
sentencing
factor
legislative
history
also
contains
contrary
indications
statements
made
amendment
sponsors
suggesting
assumption
subsection
established
element
elements
proven
trial
see
cong
rec
july
statement
biden
defendant
convicted
raping
woman
emphasis
added
hardly
seems
occasion
doubt
subsequent
legislative
history
hazardous
basis
inferring
intent
earlier
congress
pension
benefit
guaranty
corporation
ltv
corp
quoting
price
indeed
leeriness
relying
hindsight
expressed
legislative
history
confirmed
recognizing
oddity
defining
fact
serious
bodily
injury
reference
distinct
offense
offense
elements
like
sexual
abuse
time
assuming
fact
defined
merely
sentencing
consideration
think
legislative
history
attracted
appeals
helpful
government
see
committee
reports
floor
debate
statute
refer
augmentation
criminal
law
singular
plural
speaking
new
federal
crime
offense
carjacking
singular
see
pt
cong
rec
statement
dingell
make
distinction
turns
circumstances
characterizing
cluster
provisions
enacting
something
described
singular
terms
offense
crime
signify
good
deal
speakers
writers
addressing
point
distinction
mattered
however
passages
cited
references
couched
singular
occur
discussions
issue
offense
elements
versus
sentencing
factors
confront
think
significance
slight
subject
legislative
history
add
see
nothing
favorable
government
fact
statement
house
report
explaining
drafters
carjacking
statute
drew
examples
federal
robbery
statutes
referred
early
version
carjacking
statute
lacked
reference
aggravated
forms
offense
defined
subsections
see
supra
suggestion
congress
looked
earlier
robbery
statutes
settled
language
contained
carjacking
statute
first
paragraph
think
strange
congress
find
guidance
robbery
statutes
beginning
legislative
process
forget
government
suggests
somewhat
different
context
reason
think
congress
might
abandoned
ready
federal
models
developing
fully
elaborated
version
statute
ultimately
adopted
brief
iii
think
fairest
reading
treats
fact
serious
bodily
harm
element
mere
enhancement
recognize
possibility
view
doubt
might
prompted
arguments
reading
however
resolved
rule
repeatedly
affirmed
statute
susceptible
two
constructions
one
grave
doubtful
constitutional
questions
arise
questions
avoided
duty
adopt
latter
ex
rel
attorney
general
delaware
hudson
see
also
jin
fuey
moy
respect
congress
assume
legislates
light
constitutional
limitations
rust
sullivan
adhere
principle
long
applied
beyond
debate
edward
debartolo
florida
gulf
coast
building
constr
trades
council
see
also
video
government
us
construe
statute
open
constitutional
doubt
light
series
cases
past
quarter
century
dealing
due
process
guarantee
trial
jury
first
mullaney
wilbur
reviewed
maine
murder
statute
providing
element
malice
sense
want
provocation
patterson
new
york
presumed
upon
proof
intent
kill
resulting
death
subject
defendant
right
rebuttal
acted
provocation
heat
passion
reduce
offense
manslaughter
mullaney
supra
challenge
presumption
subject
rebuttal
relieved
state
due
process
burden
prove
every
element
crime
beyond
reasonable
doubt
explained
winship
state
replied
challenge
merely
formalistic
state
law
effect
established
generic
crime
felonious
homicide
mullaney
supra
view
fact
subject
presumption
rebuttal
gone
simply
sentence
winship
controlling
declined
accord
state
license
recharacterize
issue
part
state
reading
left
statute
odds
common
law
recognition
malice
fact
distinguishing
murder
manslaughter
widely
held
modern
view
heat
passion
raised
evidence
subject
state
burden
part
unlimited
choice
characterizing
stated
fact
element
leave
state
substantially
free
manipulate
way
winship
two
terms
later
patterson
new
york
supra
ruled
winship
challenge
scheme
defining
murder
causing
death
intent
subject
affirmative
defense
extreme
emotional
disturbance
reasonable
explanation
unlike
maine
law
new
york
raised
presumption
malice
malice
omitted
elements
murder
patterson
contended
presence
absence
extreme
emotional
disturbance
affected
severity
sentence
winship
mullaney
required
state
prove
absence
fact
beyond
reasonable
doubt
rejected
argument
decline
adopt
constitutional
imperative
state
must
disprove
beyond
reasonable
doubt
every
fact
constituting
affirmative
defenses
related
culpability
accused
identified
use
presumption
establish
essential
ingredient
offense
curse
maine
law
shifting
burden
persuasion
respect
fact
state
deems
important
must
either
proved
presumed
impermissible
due
process
clause
id
one
caveat
therefore
patterson
left
free
choose
elements
define
crimes
without
impediment
winship
caveat
stated
recognition
limit
upon
state
authority
reallocate
traditional
burden
proof
case
easily
satisfied
fact
common
law
burden
proving
mitigating
circumstances
severe
emotional
disturbance
rested
defendant
id
see
also
id
mullaney
supra
narrow
reading
limit
might
ban
using
presumptions
reduce
elements
point
nominal
broader
reading
equally
open
state
lacked
discretion
omit
traditional
elements
definition
crimes
instead
require
accused
disprove
elements
cases
allocation
burden
implications
charging
obligation
requisite
quantum
proof
succeeded
mcmillan
pennsylvania
winship
issue
rose
provision
judge
finding
preponderance
visible
possession
firearm
require
mandatory
minimum
sentence
certain
felonies
minimum
fell
within
sentencing
ranges
otherwise
prescribed
although
rejected
petitioner
claim
insofar
required
finding
beyond
reasonable
doubt
fact
upon
mandatory
minimum
sentence
depended
rejected
certain
subsidiary
arguments
well
observe
result
might
different
proof
visible
possession
exposed
defendant
sentence
beyond
maximum
statute
otherwise
set
without
reference
fact
mcmillan
notable
acknowledging
question
due
process
requirements
factfinding
raises
sentencing
range
also
disposing
claim
pennsylvania
law
violated
sixth
amendment
right
jury
trial
well
petitioner
basic
argument
right
jury
determination
ultimate
facts
concerning
offense
committed
id
although
disposed
reference
back
due
process
discussion
discussion
broached
potential
constitutional
significance
factfinding
raised
sentencing
ceiling
mcmillan
recognizes
question
due
process
clause
fourteenth
amendment
jury
guarantee
sixth
jury
determination
waived
may
judicial
factfinding
preponderance
support
application
provision
increases
potential
severity
penalty
variant
given
crime
seriousness
due
process
issue
evident
mullaney
insistence
state
manipulate
way
winship
patterson
recognition
limit
state
authority
reallocate
traditional
burdens
proof
substantiality
jury
claim
evident
practical
implications
assuming
sixth
amendment
indifference
treating
fact
sets
sentencing
range
sentencing
factor
element
terms
carjacking
statute
illustrate
well
stake
serious
bodily
injury
merely
sentencing
factor
increasing
authorized
penalty
two
thirds
years
death
presumably
nothing
sentencing
factor
subsection
increasing
penalty
range
life
potential
penalty
might
rise
years
life
nonjury
determination
jury
role
correspondingly
shrink
significance
usually
carried
determinations
guilt
relative
importance
gatekeeping
cases
jury
finding
fact
necessary
maximum
sentence
merely
open
door
judicial
finding
sufficient
life
imprisonment
therefore
trivial
question
ask
whether
recognizing
unlimited
legislative
power
authorize
determinations
setting
ultimate
sentencing
limits
without
jury
invite
erosion
jury
function
point
line
must
necessarily
drawn
question
might
well
less
serious
constitutional
doubt
rule
requires
history
bearing
framers
understanding
sixth
amendment
principle
demonstrated
accepted
tolerance
exclusively
judicial
factfinding
peg
penalty
limits
history
sure
scholarship
aware
show
question
exactly
like
one
ever
raised
resolved
period
framing
hand
several
studies
demonstrate
general
level
tension
jury
powers
powers
exclusively
judicial
likely
much
fore
framers
conception
jury
right
fact
point
statutes
earlier
time
exemplifying
distinction
elements
facts
elevate
sentencing
ranges
unsurprising
given
breadth
judicial
discretion
fines
corporal
punishment
less
important
misdemeanor
cases
see
baker
introduction
english
legal
history
ed
blackstone
commentaries
laws
england
hereinafter
blackstone
preyer
penal
measures
american
colonies
overview
legal
hist
norm
fixed
sentences
cases
felony
see
langbein
english
criminal
trial
jury
eve
french
revolution
trial
jury
england
france
germany
pp
schioppa
ed
blackstone
scott
criminal
law
colonial
virginia
even
system
however
competition
developed
judge
jury
real
significance
respective
roles
potential
inevitable
severity
sentences
indirectly
checked
juries
assertions
mitigating
power
circumstances
prosecution
pointed
political
abuse
criminal
process
endowed
criminal
conviction
particularly
sanguinary
consequences
power
thwart
parliament
crown
took
form
acquittals
face
guilt
today
call
verdicts
guilty
lesser
included
offenses
manifestations
blackstone
described
pious
perjury
jurors
part
blackstone
countervailing
measures
diminish
juries
power
naturally
forthcoming
ensuing
responses
mother
country
colonies
validate
though
answer
question
government
position
raise
one
move
government
side
parliamentary
practice
barring
right
jury
trial
defining
new
statutory
offenses
see
frankfurter
corcoran
petty
federal
offenses
constitutional
guaranty
trial
jury
harv
rev
blackstone
practice
extended
violations
stamp
act
recurred
statutes
regulating
imperial
trade
see
ubbelohde
courts
american
revolution
wroth
massachusetts
vice
admiralty
law
authority
colonial
america
billias
ed
one
occasions
protest
declaration
independence
deprivation
benefit
jury
trial
see
maier
american
scripture
even
declaration
less
revolutionary
voice
continental
congress
protested
legislative
practice
words
widely
read
america
use
nonjury
proceedings
late
far
extended
blackstone
warned
check
timely
given
threaten
disuse
admirable
truly
english
trial
jury
blackstone
identifying
trial
jury
grand
bulwark
english
liberties
blackstone
contended
liberties
remain
secure
long
palladium
remains
sacred
inviolate
open
attacks
none
hardy
make
also
secret
machinations
may
sap
undermine
introducing
new
arbitrary
methods
trial
justices
peace
commissioners
revenue
courts
conscience
however
convenient
may
appear
first
doubtless
arbitrary
powers
well
executed
convenient
yet
let
remembered
delays
little
inconveniences
forms
justice
price
free
nations
must
pay
liberty
substantial
matters
blackstone
second
response
juries
power
control
outcomes
occurred
attempts
confine
jury
determinations
libel
cases
findings
fact
leaving
judges
apply
law
thus
limit
opportunities
juror
nullification
ultimately
course
attempt
failed
juries
victory
embodied
fox
libel
act
britain
see
generally
green
verdict
according
conscience
exemplified
john
peter
zenger
acquittal
colonies
see
rakove
original
meanings
significant
merely
denouement
restrictive
efforts
left
juries
control
focus
efforts
principally
juries
control
ultimate
verdict
applying
law
fact
finding
law
see
id
factfinding
role
apparently
accepted
understanding
time
finding
facts
simply
sacred
jury
prerogative
trifled
prosecution
significant
traditional
offense
common
law
courts
history
minds
framers
beyond
cavil
according
one
authority
leading
account
zenger
trial
one
possible
exception
widely
known
source
libertarian
thought
england
america
eighteenth
century
levy
freedom
speech
press
early
american
history
much
beyond
question
americans
period
perfectly
well
understood
lesson
jury
right
lost
gross
denial
erosion
see
supra
one
contributor
ratification
debates
example
commenting
jury
trial
guarantee
art
iii
echoed
blackstone
warning
need
guard
jealous
circumspection
introduction
new
arbitrary
methods
trial
variety
plausible
pretenses
may
time
imperceptibly
undermine
best
preservative
liberty
new
hampshire
farmer
june
quoted
complete
bill
rights
cogan
ed
sum
reason
suppose
present
circumstances
however
peculiar
details
time
place
relative
diminution
jury
significance
merit
sixth
amendment
concern
course
anyone
today
claim
every
fact
bearing
sentencing
must
found
jury
resolved
general
issue
intention
questioning
resolution
point
simply
diminishment
jury
significance
removing
control
facts
determining
statutory
sentencing
range
resonate
claims
earlier
controversies
raise
genuine
sixth
amendment
issue
yet
settled
position
sixth
amendment
due
process
issues
means
boards
calls
word
several
cases
followed
mcmillan
decided
last
term
stands
proposition
every
fact
expanding
penalty
range
must
stated
felony
indictment
precise
holding
recidivism
increasing
maximum
penalty
need
charged
case
dispositive
question
merely
concerned
sixth
amendment
right
jury
trial
alone
rights
indictment
notice
claimed
holding
last
term
rested
substantial
part
tradition
regarding
recidivism
sentencing
factor
element
set
indictment
repeated
emphasis
distinctive
significance
recidivism
leaves
question
regarded
fact
potentially
distinguishable
constitutional
purposes
facts
might
extend
range
possible
sentencing
see
id
outset
note
relevant
statutory
subject
matter
recidivism
ibid
recidivism
subject
matter
mind
turn
statute
language
id
first
sentencing
factor
issue
recidivism
traditional
traditional
basis
sentencing
increasing
offender
sentence
id
distinguishing
mcmillan
light
particular
sentencing
factor
issue
case
recidivism
one
basis
possible
constitutional
distinctiveness
hard
see
unlike
virtually
consideration
used
enlarge
possible
penalty
offense
certainly
unlike
factor
us
case
prior
conviction
must
established
procedures
satisfying
fair
notice
reasonable
doubt
jury
trial
guarantees
read
resolve
due
process
sixth
amendment
questions
implicated
reading
carjacking
statute
government
urges
question
resolved
series
three
cases
dealing
factfinding
capital
sentencing
first
spaziano
florida
contains
discussion
sort
factfinding
us
case
addressed
argument
capital
sentencing
must
jury
task
rejected
position
ground
capital
sentencing
like
sentencing
cases
choice
appropriate
disposition
alternative
range
alternatives
id
spaziano
followed
years
hildwin
florida
per
curiam
holding
determination
aggravating
facts
entrusted
judge
following
verdict
guilty
murder
jury
recommendation
death
without
violating
sixth
amendment
jury
clause
although
citing
spaziano
authority
hildwin
first
case
deal
expressly
factfinding
necessary
authorize
imposition
severe
alternative
sentences
thus
arguably
comparable
factfinding
necessary
expand
sentencing
range
available
conviction
lesser
crime
murder
even
satisfied
analogy
sound
hildwin
drive
answer
sixth
amendment
question
raised
government
position
hildwin
jury
made
sentencing
recommendation
death
thus
necessarily
engaging
factfinding
required
imposition
higher
sentence
determination
least
one
aggravating
factor
proved
hildwin
therefore
hardly
read
resolving
issue
discussed
reasoning
walton
arizona
confirms
walton
dealt
argument
slightly
less
expansive
one
spaziano
every
finding
underlying
sentencing
determination
must
made
jury
although
rejection
position
cited
hildwin
characterized
nature
capital
sentencing
quoting
poland
arizona
see
described
statutory
specifications
aggravating
circumstances
capital
sentencing
standards
guide
choice
alternative
verdicts
death
life
imprisonment
ibid
quoting
poland
supra
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
thus
characterized
finding
aggravating
facts
falling
within
traditional
scope
capital
sentencing
choice
greater
lesser
penalty
process
raising
ceiling
sentencing
range
available
frank
say
emphasize
careful
reading
walton
rationale
question
implicated
government
position
meaning
significant
decided
without
squarely
faced
sum
government
view
raise
serious
constitutional
questions
precedent
dispositive
doubt
issue
statutory
construction
hence
resolved
favor
avoiding
questions
done
construing
establishing
three
separate
offenses
specification
distinct
elements
must
charged
indictment
proven
beyond
reasonable
doubt
submitted
jury
verdict
judgment
appeals
accordingly
reversed
case
remanded
proceedings
consistent
opinion
ordered
nathaniel
jones
petitioner
writ
certiorari
appeals
ninth
circuit
march
justice
stevens
concurring
like
justice
scalia
see
post
convinced
unconstitutional
legislature
remove
jury
assessment
facts
increase
prescribed
range
penalties
criminal
defendant
exposed
equally
clear
facts
must
established
proof
beyond
reasonable
doubt
essence
holdings
winship
mullaney
wilbur
patterson
new
york
permit
anything
less
respect
fact
state
deems
important
must
either
proved
presumed
impermissible
due
process
clause
id
principle
firmly
embedded
jurisprudence
centuries
common
law
decisions
see
winship
duncan
louisiana
indeed
view
proper
understanding
principle
encompasses
facts
increase
minimum
well
maximum
permissible
sentence
also
facts
must
established
defendant
may
put
death
mcmillan
pennsylvania
part
ii
opinion
walton
arizona
departed
principle
think
see
mcmillan
stevens
dissenting
walton
stevens
dissenting
reconsidered
due
course
however
necessary
order
join
opinion
today
nathaniel
jones
petitioner
writ
certiorari
appeals
ninth
circuit
march
justice
scalia
concurring
dissenting
suggested
possibility
dissenting
monge
california
set
forth
considered
view
unconstitutional
remove
jury
assessment
facts
alter
congressionally
prescribed
range
penalties
criminal
defendant
exposed
think
necessary
resolve
ambiguities
criminal
statutes
fashion
avoid
violation
constitutional
principle
join
opinion
nathaniel
jones
petitioner
writ
certiorari
appeals
ninth
circuit
march
ustice
ennedy
chief
justice
justice
justice
breyer
join
dissenting
question
presented
whether
federal
carjacking
statute
prohibiting
taking
motor
vehicle
person
presence
another
force
violence
intimidation
contains
first
paragraph
complete
definition
offense
elements
crime
congress
intended
codify
view
shared
every
appeals
addressed
issue
adopts
contrary
strained
reading
according
single
statutory
section
prohibits
three
distinct
offenses
involved
simply
question
statutory
interpretation
majority
opinion
cause
much
concern
questions
statutory
interpretation
close
nonetheless
routine
today
case
however
unwilling
rest
opinion
textual
analysis
rather
bolster
statutory
interpretation
raises
specter
grave
doubtful
constitutional
questions
ante
without
adequate
explanation
origins
contours
consequences
constitutional
concerns
reliance
constitutional
doubt
rule
inconsistent
usual
principles
stare
decisis
contradicts
approach
followed
last
term
precedents
admit
real
doubt
regarding
power
congress
establish
serious
bodily
injury
death
sentencing
factors
rather
offense
elements
made
clear
departing
recent
authority
sweeping
constitutional
discussion
casts
doubt
sentencing
practices
assumptions
followed
federal
system
also
many
thus
among
unsettling
consequences
today
decision
intrudes
upon
legitimate
vital
state
interests
upsetting
proper
federal
balance
dissent
unfortunate
unnecessary
result
departs
troubling
constitutional
discussion
analyzes
text
portion
opinion
acknowledged
careful
comprehensive
submission
however
analysis
suggests
presence
interpretative
ambiguity
fact
exists
reaches
wrong
result
like
begin
textual
question
criminal
laws
proscribe
certain
conduct
specify
punishment
transgressions
person
commits
crime
conduct
violates
essential
parts
defined
offense
refer
elements
general
rule
element
charged
crime
must
set
forth
indictment
hamling
established
government
proof
beyond
reasonable
doubt
winship
determined
jury
assuming
jury
right
invoked
sullivan
louisiana
rigorous
requirements
apply
respect
factors
relevant
sentencing
offender
found
guilty
charged
crime
see
also
mcmillan
pennsylvania
question
factors
normally
matter
congress
determining
whether
clauses
set
forth
sentencing
factors
define
distinct
criminal
offenses
task
look
statute
us
ask
congress
intended
ibid
statute
follows
whoever
possessing
firearm
defined
section
title
takes
motor
vehicle
transported
shipped
received
interstate
foreign
commerce
person
presence
another
force
violence
intimidation
attempts
shall
fined
title
imprisoned
years
serious
bodily
injury
defined
section
title
results
fined
title
imprisoned
years
death
results
fined
title
imprisoned
number
years
life
supp
quite
fair
acknowledge
first
reading
initial
look
statute
suggests
clauses
sentencing
provisions
ante
view
conclusion
survives
meticulous
examination
section
begins
setting
forth
initial
paragraph
elements
typical
offense
ordinary
purposes
complete
crime
instance
single
punishment
provided
clause
think
complaint
jury
instructions
drawn
first
paragraph
without
reference
punishment
set
forth
clause
design
statute
yields
conclusion
following
numbered
provisions
convert
clauses
additional
elements
punishment
provisions
directed
sentencing
judge
alone
sure
drafting
clear
proffered
interpretation
better
implemented
word
shall
end
first
paragraph
followed
verb
form
punished
period
even
written
though
statute
sets
forth
complete
crime
first
paragraph
difficult
see
congress
double
back
insert
additional
elements
jury
consideration
clauses
likely
explanation
congress
set
forth
offense
first
punishment
second
without
intending
combine
two
unlike
unpersuaded
factors
reading
odds
congressional
intent
substance
clauses
harm
crime
including
whether
crime
commission
results
serious
bodily
injury
death
victim
long
deemed
relevant
sentencing
purposes
like
recidivism
typical
sentencing
factor
one
might
imagine
supra
point
dispute
fix
punishment
based
harm
resulting
crime
settled
practice
traditional
discretionary
sentencing
regimes
see
dept
justice
rhodes
conly
analysis
federal
sentencing
federal
justice
research
program
preguidelines
practice
respect
variety
crimes
amount
harm
threatened
done
victims
made
significant
difference
length
sentence
even
confine
attention
codified
law
however
examples
abound
prove
point
federal
statutes
notes
treat
serious
bodily
injury
sentencing
factor
ante
state
law
common
practice
discloses
widespread
reliance
factors
sentencing
purposes
see
alaska
stat
ann
physical
injury
rev
stat
ann
supp
serious
physical
injury
rev
stat
serious
bodily
injury
stat
ann
supp
permanent
physical
injury
haw
rev
stat
supp
serious
substantial
bodily
injury
upon
certain
victims
comp
ch
serious
harm
la
code
crim
proc
art
west
risk
death
great
bodily
harm
one
person
stat
ann
west
gravity
seriousness
harm
inflicted
victim
stat
serious
injury
inflicted
upon
victim
permanent
debilitating
ohio
rev
code
ann
serious
physical
harm
admin
rules
permanent
injury
code
ann
death
serious
bodily
injury
utah
code
judicial
app
form
substantial
bodily
injury
given
widespread
understanding
nothing
surprising
anomalous
conclusion
congress
chose
treat
serious
bodily
injury
resulting
death
sentencing
factors
addition
plain
reading
reinforced
common
patterns
statutory
drafting
example
one
established
statutory
model
congress
defines
elements
offense
initial
paragraph
ending
phrase
shall
punished
provided
separate
subsection
subsection
provides
graded
sentencing
ranges
predicated
upon
specific
findings
serious
bodily
injury
death
see
section
follows
similar
logic
true
clauses
separated
separate
subsection
thus
giving
rise
textual
problem
must
resolve
congress
always
separate
sentencing
factors
separate
subsections
however
see
supp
iii
fraud
enhanced
penalties
violation
results
serious
bodily
injury
results
death
statutes
like
structure
suggests
design
defines
offense
first
punishment
afterward
addition
significance
use
active
voice
main
paragraph
passive
voice
clauses
common
practice
criminal
statutes
use
active
voice
define
prohibited
conduct
see
supp
iii
hoever
kills
attempts
kill
assaults
robs
attempts
rob
receives
possesses
conceals
disposes
tex
penal
code
ann
aggravated
robbery
causes
serious
bodily
injury
uses
exhibits
deadly
weapon
cf
setting
forth
sentencing
factors
bodily
injury
results
death
results
sentencing
commission
guidelines
manual
robbery
guideline
victim
sustained
bodily
injury
drafting
conventions
absolute
rules
congress
uses
active
language
phrasing
sentencing
factors
instances
see
supp
iii
serious
bodily
injury
victim
results
offender
uses
dangerous
weapon
offense
nevertheless
customary
drafting
conventions
support
rather
contradict
interpretation
sets
forth
one
offense
offers
specific
arguments
regarding
background
considerations
deserving
consideration
response
first
principal
argument
cites
three
federal
robbery
statutes
according
legislative
history
modeled
acknowledges
however
one
statutes
refer
serious
bodily
injury
death
result
ing
omission
deems
statute
irrelevant
purposes
yet
committee
report
cited
definition
tracks
language
used
federal
robbery
including
ante
quoting
pt
definition
offense
includes
tak
ing
attempt
ing
take
motor
vehicle
person
presence
another
force
violence
intimidation
altogether
consistent
definition
offense
provides
part
hoever
force
violence
intimidation
takes
attempts
take
person
presence
another
something
value
shall
imprisoned
course
include
least
one
element
within
special
maritime
territorial
jurisdiction
former
transported
shipped
received
interstate
foreign
commerce
latter
elements
however
included
unambiguous
fashion
part
statutes
respect
debatable
interpretive
question
whether
serious
bodily
injury
death
part
carjacking
offense
circumstance
definition
offense
based
include
elements
suggests
include
elements
either
passing
suggests
support
reading
disagree
section
captioned
bank
robbery
incidental
crimes
consists
eight
subsections
last
three
definitional
irrelevant
question
hand
first
subsection
subsection
proscribes
crime
bank
robbery
language
tracks
definition
offense
tak
ing
attempt
ing
take
something
value
person
presence
another
force
violence
intimidation
subsection
proceeds
define
offense
bank
larceny
cast
different
terms
natural
light
different
conduct
proscribed
subsections
two
subsections
relied
upon
provide
follows
whoever
committing
attempting
commit
offense
defined
subsections
section
assaults
person
puts
jeopardy
life
person
use
dangerous
weapon
device
shall
fined
title
imprisoned
years
whoever
committing
offense
defined
section
avoiding
attempting
avoid
apprehension
commission
offense
freeing
attempting
free
arrest
confinement
offense
kills
person
forces
person
accompany
without
consent
person
shall
imprisoned
less
ten
years
death
results
shall
punished
death
life
imprisonment
held
subsections
set
forth
separate
offenses
citations
mcmillan
score
inapt
neither
case
hold
set
forth
distinct
offenses
assuming
however
fail
prove
point
two
reasons
first
matter
structure
divided
distinct
subsections
parallel
form
excluding
definitional
provisions
end
five
subsections
begins
word
hoever
followed
specified
conduct
given
subsections
subsections
set
forth
distinct
offenses
fair
presume
like
structured
neighbors
well
one
finds
analogous
subsections
clauses
matched
contrary
clause
plainly
fails
introduce
anything
construed
offense
element
making
less
likely
offense
elements
introduced
clauses
second
phrases
cited
assaults
person
puts
jeopardy
life
person
use
dangerous
weapon
device
rather
different
serious
bodily
injury
results
death
results
language
former
phrases
occur
clause
shall
also
phrased
active
voice
placing
attention
defendant
actions
rather
consequences
death
results
phrase
end
subsection
closer
analogue
clauses
reason
assume
phrase
opposed
preceding
portion
subsection
defines
element
offense
respect
asserts
without
citation
authority
phrase
another
person
suffered
significant
bodily
injury
subsection
element
offense
ante
even
assuming
correct
point
however
differences
structure
provision
show
comparable
clauses
set
forth
alternative
sentences
three
clauses
set
forth
alternative
ways
qualifying
punishment
provided
natural
reading
drafters
took
thing
took
language
defining
basic
elements
robbery
language
provisions
common
four
statutes
short
even
indulging
assumptions
federal
robbery
statutes
support
conclusion
contains
three
substantive
offenses
rather
four
statutes
employ
similar
language
define
elements
basic
offense
sense
modeled
next
relies
consumer
statute
support
reading
indeed
true
suggests
structure
phrasing
similar
carjacking
statute
however
neither
research
indicates
appeals
held
creates
multiple
offenses
case
cited
proposition
courts
appeals
treat
statute
defining
basic
aggravated
offenses
ante
establishes
nothing
kind
appeals
recite
defendant
charged
convicted
multiple
counts
product
tampering
three
subsections
meling
none
issues
presented
turned
whether
subsections
set
forth
additional
elements
final
justification
reading
rests
state
practice
course
argue
take
factors
like
serious
bodily
injury
account
sentencing
discussed
instead
says
many
created
distinct
offense
aggravated
robbery
requiring
proof
serious
bodily
injury
harm
unremarkable
laws
reflect
nothing
common
intuition
forcible
theft
else
equal
blameworthy
results
serious
bodily
injury
death
doubt
congress
responding
intuition
added
clauses
recognizing
common
policy
concern
however
gives
scant
guidance
question
us
whether
congress
meant
give
effect
policy
making
serious
bodily
injury
death
elements
distinct
offenses
making
sentencing
factors
agree
state
statutes
direct
authority
issue
presented
ante
persuasive
force
citations
undercut
structural
differences
laws
ten
thirteen
statutes
cited
follow
pattern
one
statutory
section
sets
forth
elements
basic
robbery
offense
another
section
captioned
aggravated
robbery
robbery
first
degree
incorporates
basic
robbery
offense
either
explicit
obvious
implication
adds
bodily
physical
injury
element
active
voice
provides
aggravated
crime
subject
higher
penalty
set
forth
elsewhere
class
felony
two
remaining
three
statutes
penal
law
mckinney
rev
stat
ann
michie
deviate
pattern
minor
respects
third
rev
stat
ann
singular
structure
congress
wished
emulate
state
practice
detail
one
might
expected
structure
similar
manner
majority
model
cf
suggests
either
congress
chose
different
structure
utilized
order
show
intent
treat
serious
bodily
injury
sentencing
factor
ii
congress
simply
concentrate
state
practice
deciding
whether
serious
bodily
injury
classed
element
sentencing
factor
neither
possibility
sustains
interpretation
ii
although
view
errs
reading
simple
matter
statutory
construction
far
greater
concern
constitutional
discussion
order
inject
rule
constitutional
doubt
case
treats
relevant
line
authorities
winship
purpose
write
odds
produce
coherent
body
case
law
interpreting
relevant
constitutional
provisions
attempt
create
instability
neither
proper
use
rule
constitutional
doubt
persuasive
reading
precedents
settled
opinion
says
winship
made
clear
long
accepted
criminal
justice
system
principle
criminal
case
government
must
establish
guilt
beyond
reasonable
doubt
implement
constitutional
protection
follows
must
understanding
essential
elements
crime
cases
like
one
arise
requiring
statutory
analysis
nonetheless
holding
first
case
decided
wake
winship
mullaney
wilbur
seems
straightforward
homicide
cases
maine
sought
presume
malice
fact
intentional
killing
alone
subject
defendant
right
prove
acted
heat
passion
even
though
fact
issue
presence
absence
heat
passion
sudden
provocation
almost
inception
common
law
homicide
single
important
factor
determining
degree
culpability
attaching
unlawful
homicide
later
explained
mullaney
held
state
must
prove
every
ingredient
offense
beyond
reasonable
doubt
may
shift
burden
proof
defendant
presuming
ingredient
upon
proof
elements
offense
patterson
new
york
patterson
confronted
state
rule
placing
defendant
burden
establishing
extreme
emotional
disturbance
affirmative
defense
murder
today
majority
opinion
recognizes
patterson
stands
proposition
state
considerable
leeway
determining
factors
shall
included
elements
crimes
determined
new
york
permitted
place
burden
proving
affirmative
defense
defendants
nothing
presumed
implied
mcmillan
pennsylvania
upheld
state
law
requiring
imposition
mandatory
minimum
sentence
upon
trial
judge
determination
defendant
visibly
possessed
firearm
commission
enumerated
offense
today
majority
errs
respectful
view
suggesting
mcmillan
somewhat
inconsistent
patterson
mcmillan
holding
follows
easily
patterson
mcmillan
confirmed
state
authority
treat
aggravated
behavior
factor
increasing
sentence
rather
element
crime
opinion
made
clear
already
rejected
claim
whenever
state
links
severity
punishment
presence
absence
identified
fact
state
must
prove
fact
beyond
reasonable
doubt
quoting
patterson
new
york
supra
today
decision
chooses
rely
language
mcmillan
create
doubt
none
ante
yet
uncertainty
score
put
rest
decision
last
term
say
otherwise
majority
must
strive
limit
must
struggle
patterson
mcmillan
however
controls
question
us
initial
matter
makes
clear
constitutional
doubt
methodology
employed
today
incorrect
teaches
constitutional
doubt
canon
construction
applicable
statute
issue
genuinely
susceptible
two
constructions
complexities
unraveled
statutory
construction
avoids
constitutional
question
fair
one
reasons
given
part
supra
appeals
interpretation
view
superior
petitioner
reading
minimum
question
whether
statute
issue
set
forth
sentencing
factors
elements
distinct
offenses
closer
one
statutory
question
presented
yet
found
insufficient
ambiguity
warrant
application
constitutional
doubt
principle
unless
abandon
pretense
consistency
application
principle
incumbent
explain
reconciles
analysis
proper
construction
statute
clearer
less
reason
light
question
constitutionality
statute
construed
appeals
insubstantiality
constitutional
concern
indicated
quite
summary
reference
principle
constitutional
law
statute
might
offend
puts
argument
way
fact
prior
conviction
increases
maximum
penalty
crime
must
charged
indictment
submitted
jury
proven
beyond
reasonable
doubt
ante
suggests
carjacking
statute
violates
principle
absent
finding
serious
bodily
injury
defendant
may
sentenced
maximum
years
imprisonment
absent
finding
death
may
sentenced
maximum
years
imprisonment
finding
serious
bodily
injury
increases
maximum
penalty
crime
carjacking
years
imprisonment
finding
death
increases
maximum
life
imprisonment
taken
word
congress
comply
principle
making
minor
changes
phraseology
leave
statutory
scheme
practical
purposes
unchanged
congress
leave
initial
paragraph
intact
provide
one
commits
conduct
described
shall
imprisoned
number
years
life
add
sentencing
judge
determines
death
resulted
one
convicted
section
shall
imprisoned
years
sentencing
judge
determines
serious
bodily
injury
resulted
one
convicted
section
shall
imprisoned
years
practical
result
current
version
construed
appeals
jury
makes
requisite
findings
initial
paragraph
sentences
defendant
within
one
prescribed
ranges
based
judge
determination
whether
serious
bodily
injury
death
resulted
tell
us
whether
version
statute
pass
constitutional
muster
principle
amounts
nothing
chastising
congress
failing
use
approved
phrasing
expressing
intent
carjackers
punished
constitutional
values
served
formalistic
approach
constitutional
costs
statutes
struck
today
misconstrued
real
hand
rephrased
still
violate
underlying
constitutional
principle
explain
determine
sentencing
schemes
cross
constitutional
line
example
statute
sets
maximum
penalty
provides
detailed
sentencing
criteria
applied
sentencing
judge
along
lines
federal
sentencing
guidelines
detailed
version
rephrased
suggested
left
guess
whether
statutes
sort
might
jeopardy
terms
justice
scalia
view
unconstitutional
remove
jury
assessment
facts
alter
congressionally
prescribed
range
penalties
criminal
defendant
exposed
ante
concurring
opinion
call
question
validity
mandatory
minimum
sentencing
provisions
contrary
holding
mcmillan
facts
triggering
application
mandatory
minimum
found
judge
sentencing
range
defendant
exposed
altered
light
uncertainties
today
decision
raises
questions
acknowledges
event
constitutional
doubts
well
founded
squarely
rejected
petitioner
argument
significant
increase
statutory
maximum
sentence
trigger
constitutional
elements
requirement
said
constitution
impose
requirement
see
also
monge
california
rejected
absolute
rule
enhancement
constitutes
element
offense
time
increases
maximum
sentence
defendant
exposed
indeed
dissenters
doubt
score
opinion
scalia
arguing
today
unnecessary
resolution
point
serious
doubt
whether
constitution
permits
defendant
sentencing
exposure
increased
tenfold
basis
fact
charged
tried
jury
found
beyond
reasonable
doubt
suggests
two
bases
distinguishable
neither
persuasive
first
suggests
case
concerned
sixth
amendment
right
jury
trial
alone
rights
indictment
notice
claimed
ante
valid
basis
upon
distinguish
petitioner
claimed
constitution
requires
congress
treat
recidivism
element
offense
corollary
government
must
prove
element
jury
suggested
previous
opinions
moreover
difference
context
relevant
one
hand
right
jury
determination
right
notice
indictment
determination
based
upon
proof
prosecution
beyond
reasonable
doubt
offers
reason
concept
element
crime
mean
one
thing
one
inquiry
something
else
another
little
guide
us
formulating
standard
differentiate
elements
crime
purposes
indictment
jury
trial
proof
beyond
reasonable
doubt
inviting
confusion
curious
way
safeguard
important
procedural
rights
criminal
defendants
second
eager
find
controlling
significance
fact
statute
issue
made
recidivism
sentencing
factor
sentencing
factor
issue
serious
bodily
injury
difference
constitutional
dimension
say
otherwise
true
statutory
analysis
informed
substantial
measure
fact
recividism
common
sentencing
factor
constitutional
analysis
invoked
long
history
using
recidivism
basis
increasing
offender
sentence
illustrate
novel
anomalous
character
petitioner
proposed
constitutional
rule
mcmillan
pennsylvania
factor
increases
maximum
penalty
crime
must
deemed
element
offense
proceeded
reject
rule
dissenters
like
today
misunderstood
import
discussion
correct
observation
impossible
understand
mcmillan
mean
one
thing
later
case
recidivism
issue
something
else
later
case
sentencing
factor
issue
opinion
calia
constitutional
portion
also
rejected
argument
constitutional
concerns
raised
different
tradition
courts
treated
recidivism
element
related
crime
id
found
argument
unconvincing
tradition
uniform
ibid
course
true
respect
sentencing
factors
issue
see
infra
sum
rational
basis
making
recidivism
exception
calia
dissenting
emphasis
omitted
deems
new
direction
justified
departure
stare
decisis
make
case
support
view
based
historical
misunderstanding
misinterpretation
submission
historical
discussion
demonstrates
tension
jury
safeguard
exclusively
judicial
powers
probably
generally
informed
framers
conception
jury
right
ante
must
correct
call
question
principle
definition
elements
criminal
offense
entrusted
legislature
staples
quoting
liparota
historical
analysis
might
bearing
instant
case
disclosed
intent
serve
real
objective
punishing
without
constitutional
safeguards
caused
serious
bodily
harm
rather
prevent
underlying
conduct
carjacking
see
supra
inference
implication
drawn
text
statutory
history
offense
consideration
fact
makes
attempt
argue
anything
particular
carjacking
statute
suggests
jury
role
unconstitutionally
diminished
gravamen
offense
carjacking
coupled
threat
bodily
harm
jury
resolves
issues
whether
vehicle
taken
force
violence
intimidation
indeed
whether
serious
bodily
injury
results
outside
defendant
control
already
explained
least
novel
view
offense
established
extent
harm
caused
taken
account
sentencing
phase
respect
today
case
far
easier
mcmillan
sentencing
factor
inherent
criminal
conduct
rationale
constitutional
doubt
holding
makes
difficult
predict
full
consequences
today
holding
likely
cause
disruption
uncertainty
sentencing
systems
sentencing
one
difficult
tasks
enforcement
criminal
law
seeking
bring
order
consistency
process
sought
move
system
indeterminate
sentencing
grant
vast
discretion
trial
judge
regime
uniform
penalties
prescribed
legislature
see
campbell
law
sentencing
ed
confronted
unexpected
rule
mandating
factors
bearing
upon
sentence
must
treated
offense
elements
determination
jury
especially
issue
conduct
defendant
consequences
completed
criminal
act
disconcerting
result
today
decision
needless
doubt
analysis
casts
upon
cases
involving
capital
sentencing
example
walton
arizona
viewed
aggravating
factors
issue
sentencing
enhancements
elements
offense
true
serious
bodily
injury
reading
rejects
constitutionally
suspect
question
given
characterization
statutory
scheme
walton
constitutionally
permissible
relevant
arizona
statute
walton
sentenced
death
unless
trial
judge
found
least
one
enumerated
aggravating
factors
see
rev
stat
ann
absent
finding
maximum
potential
punishment
provided
law
term
imprisonment
constitutionally
impermissible
allow
judge
finding
increase
maximum
punishment
carjacking
years
clear
judge
finding
may
increase
maximum
punishment
murder
imprisonment
death
fact
walton
appear
better
candidate
new
approach
instant
case
walton
question
aggravated
character
defendant
conduct
result
followed
criminal
conduct
completed
distinguishing
line
precedent
suggests
walton
squarely
fac
key
constitutional
question
implicated
government
position
meaning
ante
implication
clear
reexamination
area
capital
jurisprudence
expected
misreads
seeks
create
constitutional
doubt
none
view
controls
case
hold
interpreted
appeals
constitutional
dissent
opinion
judgment
footnotes
congress
amended
statute
violent
crime
control
law
enforcement
act
deleted
phrase
first
paragraph
concerning
firearm
possession
replaced
phrase
intent
cause
death
serious
bodily
harm
stat
also
made
death
possible
punishment
offenses
committed
subsection
ibid
carjacking
correction
act
congress
specified
term
serious
bodily
injury
subsection
includes
certain
sexual
assaults
stat
ninth
circuit
vacated
another
portion
district
sentencing
decision
remanded
oliver
remand
district
reduced
petitioner
carjacking
sentence
years
total
sentence
years
appeals
affirmed
app
see
infra
legislative
history
identifies
three
models
see
pt
definition
offense
tracks
language
used
federal
robbery
statutes
one
robbery
areas
federal
maritime
territorial
jurisdiction
lacks
aggravated
forms
offense
altogether
thus
point
dissent
passing
questions
view
makes
causing
significant
bodily
injury
element
offense
defined
section
see
post
offers
reason
doubt
reading
given
establishes
one
maximum
punishment
makes
eligibility
punishment
contingent
establishment
least
one
three
facts
one
causing
death
significant
bodily
injury
think
reading
sensible
one
dissent
repeatedly
chides
us
failing
state
precisely
enough
principle
animating
view
carjacking
statute
construed
government
may
violate
constitution
see
post
preceding
paragraph
text
expresses
principle
plainly
enough
due
process
clause
fifth
amendment
notice
jury
trial
guarantees
sixth
amendment
fact
prior
conviction
increases
maximum
penalty
crime
must
charged
indictment
submitted
jury
proven
beyond
reasonable
doubt
prior
cases
suggest
rather
establish
principle
concern
government
reading
statute
rises
level
doubt
certainty
contrary
dissent
suggestion
constitutional
proposition
drives
concern
way
call
question
principle
definition
elements
criminal
offense
entrusted
legislature
post
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
constitutional
guarantees
give
rise
concern
way
restrict
ability
legislatures
identify
conduct
wish
characterize
criminal
define
facts
whose
proof
essential
establishment
criminal
liability
constitutional
safeguards
figure
analysis
concern
identity
elements
defining
criminal
liability
required
procedures
finding
facts
determine
maximum
permissible
punishment
safeguards
going
formality
notice
identity
factfinder
burden
proof
english
practice
see
langbein
shaping
criminal
trial
chi
rev
green
english
criminal
trial
jury
trial
jury
england
france
germany
schioppa
ed
colonial
american
practice
see
goebell
naughton
law
enforcement
colonial
new
york
state
bennet
brevard
principle
jury
judges
fact
judges
deciders
law
stated
established
principle
early
coke
see
coke
institutes
laws
england
ad
questionem
facti
non
respondent
judices
ad
questionem
juris
non
respondent
juratores
see
also
langbein
english
criminal
trial
jury
eve
french
revolution
trial
jury
england
france
germany
supra
even
traditional
view
libel
law
recognized
jury
authority
matters
fact
see
king
francklin
tr
publication
words
meaning
ascribed
two
matters
fact
come
consideration
proper
judges
third
thing
wit
whether
defamatory
expressions
amount
libel
belong
office
jury
office
matter
law
fact
proper
judges
thus
participants
struggle
jury
autonomy
seditious
libel
cases
viewed
debate
concerned
extent
jury
power
unquestioned
role
determiner
factual
issues
see
green
verdict
according
conscience
influential
jurists
suggested
might
also
seen
struggle
jury
right
find
particular
fact
namely
required
criminal
intent
see
holdsworth
history
english
law
see
blackstone
jurors
choose
stop
special
verdicts
wished
dissent
insists
controls
question
us
post
substantiating
assertion
tellingly
relies
heavily
claims
dissenters
statements
majority
neither
source
bears
current
dissent
conclusion
dissenters
case
suggest
turn
particular
sentencing
factor
issue
instead
stood
broad
proposition
fact
increasing
maximum
permissible
punishment
may
determined
judge
preponderance
mystery
majority
engaged
much
discussion
recidivism
crux
constitutional
discussion
turned
first
discuss
tradition
recidivism
treatment
sentencing
factor
ibid
never
announced
unqualified
holding
today
dissenters
claim
find
admittedly
dissent
notes
dissenters
criticized
majority
considered
majority
unsupportable
restraint
restricting
holding
recidivism
criticism
lacked
target
majority
doggedly
refrained
endorsing
general
principle
dissent
case
attributes
majority
dissenters
disagreed
legitimacy
decision
restrict
holding
recidivism
sides
agreed
done
tones
alarm
dissent
suggests
see
post
decision
unsettle
efforts
many
bring
greater
consistency
sentencing
practices
provisions
determinate
sentences
statutorily
administratively
established
guidelines
governing
sentencing
decisions
dissent
concern
misplaced
several
reasons
immediately
decision
today
announce
new
principle
constitutional
law
merely
interprets
particular
federal
statute
light
set
constitutional
concerns
emerged
series
decisions
past
quarter
century
even
assume
question
raise
someday
followed
answer
dissenters
seem
fear
answer
way
hinder
national
government
choosing
pursue
policies
aimed
rationalizing
sentencing
practices
constitutional
concern
expressed
lead
rule
requiring
jury
determination
facts
raise
sentencing
ceiling
rule
way
constrain
legislative
authority
identify
facts
relevant
punishment
establish
fixed
penalties
constitutional
guarantees
prompt
interpretation
bear
solely
procedures
facts
raise
possible
penalty
found
notice
must
given
must
find
facts
burden
must
satisfied
demonstrate
finally
disagree
dissent
dire
prediction
effect
decision
ability
choose
certain
sentencing
policies
go
without
saying
policies
conflict
safeguards
enshrined
constitution
protection
accused
policies
yield
constitutional
guarantees
see
burch
louisiana
verdicts
criminal
juries
sufficiently
threaten
constitutional
principles
animating
jury
trial
guarantee
countervailing
interest
state
yield
cf
needs
law
enforcement
stand
constant
tension
constitution
protections
individual
certain
exercises
official
power
precisely
predictability
pressures
counsels
resolute
loyalty
constitutional
safeguards