miller
argued
january
decided
june
district
columbia
officers
without
warrant
knocked
door
petitioner
apartment
upon
inquiry
replied
low
voice
police
petitioner
opened
door
quickly
tried
close
whereupon
officers
broke
door
entered
arrested
petitioner
seized
marked
bills
later
admitted
evidence
petitioner
objection
trial
convicted
violations
narcotics
laws
held
petitioner
lawfully
arrested
home
officers
breaking
without
first
giving
notice
authority
purpose
arrest
unlawful
evidence
seized
inadmissible
conviction
reversed
pp
validity
arrest
without
warrant
violation
federal
law
local
peace
officers
determined
reference
local
law
pp
district
columbia
law
peace
officers
otherwise
authorized
break
door
home
make
arrest
may
denied
admittance
notice
authority
purpose
pp
since
express
announcement
made
since
evidence
case
sufficient
prove
petitioner
knew
purpose
arresting
officers
arrest
unlawful
pp
de
long
harris
argued
cause
filed
brief
petitioner
leonard
sand
argued
cause
brief
solicitor
general
rankin
acting
assistant
attorney
general
mclean
beatrice
rosenberg
justice
brennan
delivered
opinion
petitioner
william
miller
together
bessie
byrd
brother
arthur
shepherd
tried
convicted
district
district
columbia
conspiracy
commit
violations
violations
federal
narcotics
laws
supp
appeals
district
columbia
circuit
affirmed
one
judge
dissenting
app
granted
certiorari
determine
whether
evidence
seized
time
petitioner
arrest
properly
admitted
petitioner
evidence
marked
currency
seized
federal
officers
arrested
petitioner
bessie
byrd
apartment
march
clifford
reed
arrested
arrest
warrant
washington
street
suspicion
narcotics
offenses
reed
revealed
wilson
federal
narcotics
agent
purchased
heroin
quantities
petitioner
shepherd
agent
wilson
knew
petitioner
one
trafficked
narcotics
convicted
narcotics
offense
reed
said
meet
shepherd
later
morning
make
purchase
agent
wilson
enlisted
aid
apprehend
shepherd
petitioner
another
federal
narcotics
agent
lewis
carrying
marked
currency
went
reed
taxicab
shepherd
home
reed
introduced
lewis
shepherd
buyer
shepherd
accepted
agreed
secure
capsules
heroin
petitioner
deliver
lewis
reed
apartment
shepherd
proceeded
alone
taxicab
petitioner
apartment
taxicab
followed
agent
wilson
officer
wurms
metropolitan
police
department
officers
police
cars
shepherd
seen
leave
taxicab
front
apartment
house
petitioner
bessie
byrd
occupied
basement
apartment
taxicab
waited
shepherd
entered
basement
agent
wilson
looked
basement
hall
see
went
shepherd
came
basement
within
minutes
taxicab
taxicab
proceeding
toward
reed
apartment
officers
following
police
cars
intercepted
shepherd
arrested
searched
marked
bills
person
admitted
agent
wilson
officer
wurms
package
capsules
narcotics
found
taxicab
front
seat
put
police
cars
stopped
taxicab
said
taken
package
behind
fire
extinguisher
basement
hall
sent
fellow
reed
promised
getting
federal
officers
returned
immediately
apartment
building
agent
wilson
officer
wurms
went
door
petitioner
apartment
officer
wurms
knocked
upon
inquiry
within
replied
low
voice
police
petitioner
opened
door
attached
door
chain
asked
officers
either
responded
attempted
close
door
thereupon
according
officer
wurms
put
hands
inside
door
pulled
ripped
chain
entered
officers
arrest
search
warrant
expressly
demand
admission
state
purpose
presence
place
petitioner
arrest
entered
apartment
bessie
byrd
also
arrested
apartment
turned
cash
housecoat
cash
included
marked
currency
extended
search
remaining
marked
currency
found
hatbox
closet
rest
within
covers
bed
bedroom
government
contends
probable
cause
arresting
petitioner
marked
currency
properly
admitted
evidence
seized
incident
lawful
arrest
harris
petitioner
argument
breaks
three
contentions
officers
probable
cause
arrest
petitioner
without
warrant
search
justified
incident
lawful
arrest
arrest
therefore
search
event
unlawful
officers
broke
door
petitioner
home
without
first
giving
notice
authority
purpose
demanding
admission
one
contentions
prevails
agreed
marked
money
inadmissible
evidence
view
take
need
consider
petitioner
third
contention
lawfulness
arrest
petitioner
depends
upon
power
arresting
officers
break
doors
home
order
arrest
without
warrant
persons
suspected
committed
narcotics
offenses
agent
wilson
statutory
authority
arrest
without
warrant
although
officer
wurms
member
metropolitan
police
department
authority
said
similar
circumstance
arrest
violation
federal
law
state
peace
officers
lawfulness
arrest
without
warrant
determined
reference
state
law
di
johnson
like
reasoning
validity
arrest
petitioner
determined
reference
law
district
columbia
making
reference
law
mindful
policy
interfering
local
rules
law
fashioned
courts
district
columbia
fisher
griffin
government
agrees
petitioner
validity
entry
execute
arrest
without
warrant
must
tested
criteria
identical
embodied
deals
entry
execute
search
warrant
section
provides
officer
executing
search
warrant
may
break
open
door
notice
authority
purpose
denied
admittance
government
brief
arrest
made
probable
cause
rather
warrant
statutory
requirements
must
met
officer
force
entry
apartment
statutory
requirements
substantially
identical
judicially
developed
appeals
district
columbia
circuit
accarino
app
since
rule
accarino
bears
close
relationship
statute
confined
operation
district
columbia
believe
review
warranted
cf
del
vecchio
bowers
carroll
earliest
days
common
law
drastically
limited
authority
law
officers
break
door
house
effect
arrest
action
invades
precious
interest
privacy
summed
ancient
adage
man
house
castle
early
edward
iv
folio
recorded
holding
unlawful
sheriff
break
doors
man
house
arrest
civil
suit
debt
trespass
arrest
private
interest
party
remarks
attributed
william
pitt
earl
chatham
occasion
debate
parliament
searches
incident
enforcement
excise
cider
eloquently
expressed
principle
poorest
man
may
cottage
bid
defiance
forces
crown
may
frail
roof
may
shake
wind
may
blow
storm
may
enter
rain
may
enter
king
england
enter
force
dares
cross
threshold
ruined
tenement
whatever
circumstances
breaking
door
arrest
felony
might
lawful
however
breaking
unlawful
officer
failed
first
state
authority
purpose
demanding
admission
requirement
pronounced
semayne
case
eng
repr
cases
king
party
sheriff
doors
open
may
break
party
house
either
arrest
execution
ing
process
otherwise
enter
breaks
signify
cause
coming
make
request
open
doors
emphasis
supplied
requirement
stated
semayne
case
still
obtains
reflected
statutes
large
number
american
law
institute
proposed
code
criminal
procedure
applies
government
concedes
whether
arrest
made
virtue
warrant
officers
authorized
make
arrest
felony
without
warrant
state
decisions
holding
justification
noncompliance
exists
exigent
circumstances
example
officers
may
good
faith
believe
someone
within
peril
bodily
harm
read
case
person
arrested
fleeing
attempting
destroy
evidence
people
maddox
cal
whether
unqualified
requirements
rule
admit
exception
justifying
noncompliance
exigent
circumstances
question
called
upon
decide
case
government
makes
claim
existence
circumstances
excusing
compliance
government
concedes
compliance
required
argues
compliance
evident
events
immediately
preceding
officers
forced
entry
rule
seems
require
notice
form
express
announcement
officers
purpose
demanding
admission
burden
making
express
announcement
certainly
slight
words
officers
satisfied
requirement
case
may
without
express
announcement
purpose
facts
known
officers
justify
virtually
certain
petitioner
already
knows
purpose
announcement
useless
gesture
cf
people
martin
cal
wilgus
arrest
without
warrant
rev
even
test
evidence
upon
government
relies
sufficient
justify
officers
failure
expressly
notify
petitioner
demanded
admission
apartment
purpose
arresting
single
fact
known
officers
upon
government
relies
occurrence
petitioner
evinced
instantaneous
resistance
entry
almost
instinctive
attempt
bar
entry
officers
identified
police
argued
occurrence
certainly
points
knew
purpose
immediately
realized
detected
officers
arrest
wholly
unrealistic
say
officers
made
purpose
known
formally
announce
arrest
first
fact
petitioner
attempted
close
door
prove
knew
purpose
arrest
ambiguous
act
merely
expected
reaction
citizen
experience
hour
morning
particularly
since
appear
officers
uniform
cf
accarino
supra
app
answer
police
spoken
low
voice
might
heard
petitioner
far
officers
tell
second
petitioner
reaction
upon
opening
door
created
doubt
officers
minds
knew
police
intent
arresting
motion
suppress
agent
wilson
testified
wanted
know
query
went
unanswered
face
inconsistent
knowledge
majority
appeals
denied
import
query
inferring
miller
knew
wilson
wurms
personally
recognized
soon
opened
door
inference
support
record
even
inference
supportable
miller
recognition
wilson
wurms
police
officers
justified
light
facts
known
virtually
certain
miller
actually
knew
reason
presence
officers
knew
petitioner
unaware
shepherd
arrest
knew
unaware
currency
marked
knew
unaware
presence
pursuant
plan
initiated
reed
disclosures
catch
petitioner
criminal
act
moreover
actually
know
petitioner
made
sale
shepherd
received
marked
money
shepherd
talked
seen
enter
petitioner
apartment
fact
marked
money
found
apartment
bearing
upon
petitioner
knowledge
officers
purpose
since
know
money
marked
said
di
supra
frequent
occasion
point
search
made
legal
turns
law
good
bad
starts
change
character
success
said
petitioner
act
attempting
close
door
might
basis
officers
virtually
certain
petitioner
knew
police
door
conducting
investigation
however
falls
short
virtual
certainty
petitioner
knew
purpose
arrest
requirement
met
except
notice
purpose
government
admits
officers
authority
break
petitioner
door
except
arrest
must
therefore
conclude
petitioner
receive
required
notice
authority
purpose
duly
mindful
reliance
society
must
place
achieving
law
order
upon
enforcing
agencies
criminal
law
insistence
observance
law
officers
traditional
fair
procedural
requirements
long
point
view
best
calculated
contribute
end
however
much
particular
case
insistence
upon
rules
may
appear
technicality
inures
benefit
guilty
person
history
criminal
law
proves
tolerance
shortcut
methods
law
enforcement
impairs
enduring
effectiveness
requirement
prior
notice
authority
purpose
forcing
entry
home
deeply
rooted
heritage
given
grudging
application
congress
codifying
tradition
embedded
law
declared
reverence
law
individual
right
privacy
house
every
householder
good
bad
guilty
innocent
entitled
protection
designed
secure
common
interest
unlawful
invasion
house
petitioner
lawfully
arrested
home
officers
breaking
without
first
giving
notice
authority
purpose
petitioner
receive
notice
officers
broke
door
invade
home
arrest
unlawful
evidence
seized
suppressed
reversed
footnotes
officer
wurms
testified
witness
agent
wilson
front
door
apartment
columbia
road
knocked
front
door
said
somebody
asked
said
blue
petitioner
nickname
low
voice
said
police
repeated
two
three
times
manner
door
opened
chain
door
blue
miller
saw
agent
wilson
know
else
saw
tried
close
door
time
put
hands
inside
door
pulled
ripped
chain
entered
trial
hearing
motion
suppress
agent
wilson
testified
said
want
says
police
arrest
want
says
going
let
us
something
like
officer
wurms
took
ahold
door
pulled
open
apparently
government
satisfied
agent
wilson
mistaken
saying
mention
purpose
arrest
testimony
motion
suppress
well
testimony
officer
wurms
motion
trial
contrary
government
brief
refers
testimony
merely
footnotes
brief
accepts
petitioner
premise
case
decided
upon
basis
evidence
shows
officers
formally
announce
purpose
appeals
decided
case
basis
wilson
make
statement
app
narcotics
agents
subsequently
given
authority
added
july
make
arrest
agents
reasonable
grounds
believe
person
arrested
committed
narcotics
offense
district
columbia
peace
officers
probable
cause
believe
felony
committed
empowered
arrest
without
warrant
wrightson
app
officer
may
break
open
outer
inner
door
window
house
part
house
anything
therein
execute
search
warrant
notice
authority
purpose
refused
admittance
necessary
liberate
person
aiding
execution
warrant
petitioner
raise
question
application
code
see
also
judge
prettyman
opinion
appeals
accarino
app
discusses
comprehensively
development
law
see
also
exhaustive
article
wilgus
arrest
without
warrant
rev
oxford
dictionary
quotations
ed
hansard
parliamentary
history
england
vol
column
proceedings
commons
cider
tax
march
find
pitt
spoke
measure
particularly
dangerous
precedent
admitting
officers
excise
private
houses
every
man
house
castle
said
code
tit
rev
stat
deering
cal
penal
code
fla
idaho
code
burns
ann
ind
replacement
iowa
code
gen
rev
dart
la
crim
code
art
stat
minn
miss
code
mo
rev
mont
rev
codes
neb
rev
rev
crim
code
gen
page
ohio
rev
code
stat
tit
comp
laws
code
code
code
utah
code
remington
rev
wyo
comp
code
crim
american
law
institute
official
draft
right
officer
break
building
officer
order
make
arrest
either
virtue
warrant
authorized
make
arrest
felony
without
warrant
provided
section
may
break
open
door
window
building
person
arrested
reasonably
believed
refused
admittance
announced
authority
purpose
professor
wilgus
sums
discussion
breaking
doors
thus
doors
broken
must
necessity
notice
authority
purpose
make
arrest
must
given
demand
refusal
admission
must
made
unless
already
understood
peril
increased
rev
footnotes
omitted
dissenting
opinion
herein
mistakenly
refers
passage
holding
enunciated
appeals
fact
passage
merely
quoted
without
approval
holding
upon
one
topic
appears
dispute
authorities
officer
break
open
door
home
must
make
known
cause
demand
entry
claim
case
bar
officers
advised
suspect
cause
demand
broke
door
accarino
app
judge
holtzoff
heard
motion
suppress
two
months
trial
examination
record
made
time
brings
us
complete
agreement
judge
edgerton
dissenting
appeals
said
find
evidence
cites
evidence
supports
inference
miller
even
recognized
officers
narcotics
squad
app
even
petitioner
seen
officers
sufficiently
make
faces
evidence
knew
personally
record
best
supports
inference
either
officer
personally
knew
miller
miller
met
even
heard
either
officer
officers
knew
reputed
narcotics
violator
judge
youngdahl
presided
trial
refused
hear
renewed
motion
suppress
considered
matter
settled
judge
holtzoff
ruling
agent
wilson
testimony
trial
variance
testimony
judge
holtzoff
question
whether
officers
communicated
purpose
arrest
trial
testified
miller
met
one
occasion
night
arrest
apparently
unwilling
rely
testimony
face
inconsistency
majority
appeals
allude
basis
conclusion
miller
recognized
officers
compliance
also
safeguard
police
might
mistaken
prowlers
shot
fearful
householder
see
concurring
opinion
mcdonald
justice
clark
justice
burton
concurs
dissenting
agree
requirement
prior
notice
authority
purpose
given
grudging
application
token
reduced
absurdity
majority
appeals
concluded
petitioner
time
police
entered
apartment
already
fully
understood
officers
sought
arrest
app
entry
therefore
held
valid
district
columbia
law
superimposes
upon
local
rule
district
artificial
unrealistic
requirement
even
circumstances
found
police
must
make
express
announcement
unmistakable
words
police
come
make
arrest
attempts
justify
interference
local
law
terms
concession
government
validity
entry
must
tested
federal
statute
relating
forcible
entry
execute
search
warrant
fact
government
seeks
clarification
general
federal
statute
possibly
serve
purposes
prosecutions
elsewhere
reason
us
oblige
especially
result
subvert
existing
local
law
process
reverses
conviction
wholesale
narcotics
violator
previous
record
traffic
carries
abominable
trade
using
juvenile
dope
peddler
facts
appeals
found
entry
valid
officers
trailed
shepherd
proceeded
taxicab
purchase
heroin
lewis
narcotics
agent
shepherd
went
apartment
occupied
sister
byrd
petitioner
officers
saw
enter
apartment
building
agent
wilson
followed
basement
entrance
saw
disappear
lighted
hall
long
jury
box
entrance
two
doors
hall
one
leading
petitioner
apartment
furnace
room
one
lived
basement
except
petitioner
byrd
wilson
withdrew
location
across
street
saw
light
go
furnace
room
remain
shortly
go
shepherd
soon
emerged
taxicab
drove
away
officers
followed
arrested
shepherd
seized
capsules
heroin
found
taxicab
opinion
appeals
graphically
described
subsequent
events
arrest
shepherd
officers
found
capsules
heroin
immediately
went
back
apartment
occupied
byrd
miller
minutes
later
knocked
door
announced
identity
thereupon
miller
known
officers
narcotics
violator
opened
door
part
way
recognized
officers
narcotics
squad
attempted
close
door
pulled
door
officers
resisted
effort
close
chain
bolt
broke
officers
arrested
miller
mrs
byrd
app
pretrial
hearing
petitioner
moved
suppress
marked
currency
alleging
officers
neither
warrant
probable
cause
arrest
motion
denied
trial
jury
different
judge
motion
renewed
denying
motion
judge
said
give
right
make
another
motion
certainly
right
end
testimony
petitioner
never
availed
opportunity
appeal
petitioner
shifted
ground
emphasizing
even
officers
probable
cause
arrest
authority
improperly
exercised
formally
announce
purpose
entry
appeals
held
background
facts
noted
law
summarized
find
officers
miller
door
knowing
felony
committed
probable
cause
believe
continuing
statute
spelled
clear
duty
arrest
app
majority
however
brushes
aside
conclusions
explaining
petitioner
action
slamming
door
expected
reaction
citizen
something
entirely
foreign
concept
respect
citizenry
pays
officers
accept
conclusion
circumstances
found
appeals
fall
short
virtual
certainty
petitioner
knew
officers
purpose
arrest
knowledge
absence
express
admission
never
virtual
certainty
rather
attempting
petitioner
measure
understanding
outward
acts
appeals
found
indisputably
established
petitioner
awareness
police
purpose
disturb
finding
majority
deal
exigent
circumstances
case
government
makes
claim
thus
excusing
compliance
statute
noted
however
appeals
expressly
based
opinion
fact
officers
confronted
need
decision
arising
necessitous
circumstances
situation
position
government
excuse
us
evaluating
circumstances
whole
case
believe
appeals
eminently
correct
conclusion
necessitous
circumstances
warranted
officers
entering
apartment
pointed
petitioner
might
fled
hidden
destroyed
fruits
crime
particularly
view
background
visit
shepherd
moments
certainly
soon
learned
shepherd
arrest
moreover
attempt
forcibly
prevent
entry
officers
apartment
required
immediate
action
delay
might
well
precluded
arrest
destruction
marked
money
might
prevented
establishment
petitioner
guilt
government
points
action
necessary
affirm
judgment
basis
district
columbia
rule
accarino
supra
believe
honor
rule
district
appeals
found
compliance
enunciated
accarino
app
opinion
judge
prettyman
rehearing
en
banc
instant
case
denied
without
dissent
author
accarino
participating
discussing
local
rule
judge
prettyman
accarino
quoted
approval
wilgus
arrest
without
warrant
rev
doors
broken
must
necessity
notice
authority
purpose
make
arrest
must
given
demand
refusal
admission
must
made
unless
already
understood
peril
increased
emphasis
added
app
appeals
instant
case
recognized
language
embodiment
local
rule
app
finding
petitioner
already
fully
understood
officers
sought
arrest
app
applied
rule
affirming
conviction
concludes
rule
judicially
developed
district
substantially
identical
concerns
entry
execute
search
warrant
important
note
however
certain
language
set
italics
peculiar
local
judicially
developed
rule
latter
respected
interpretation
today
government
brief
agrees
validity
entry
tested
standard
joins
position
contention
nder
circumstances
police
entry
complied
teaching
accepted
accarino
app
see
note
supra
know
miller
previous
knowledge
seen
furthermore
petitioner
affidavit
supporting
motion
suppress
swore
officers
wilson
pappas
four
others
break
chain
door
wilson
physically
assaulted
apartment
see
fisher
said
policy
interfere
local
rules
law
district
columbia
courts
fashion
save
exceptional
situations
egregious
error
committed
griffin
determined
federal
rule
issue
case
added
even
rule
necessarily
control
district
columbia
decisions
congress
enactment
statutes
often
recognized
appropriateness
one
rule
district
another
jurisdictions
far
subject
federal
law
noted
special
function
appeals
decide
questions
local
law
exceptional
cases
review
determination
question
appeals
district