mattox
argued
decided
february
plaintiff
error
convicted
january
district
district
kansas
murder
one
john
mullen
alleged
committed
december
part
indian
territory
lying
north
canadian
river
east
texas
meridian
set
apart
occupied
cherokee
creek
seminole
indian
tribes
place
district
country
exclusive
jurisdiction
within
exclusive
jurisdiction
indictment
returned
september
term
district
wichita
term
defendant
first
tried
convicted
conviction
sued
writ
error
reversed
judgment
district
remanded
case
new
trial
sup
case
continued
december
term
term
plaintiff
put
upon
trial
convicted
whereupon
sued
writ
error
chas
reddick
dudley
michener
browne
plaintiff
error
asst
atty
conrad
defendant
error
justice
brown
stating
facts
foregoing
language
delivered
opinion
error
assigned
action
assuming
jurisdiction
case
remitting
indictment
circuit
trial
admitting
jury
reporter
notes
testimony
two
witnesses
former
trial
since
died
refusing
permit
defendant
introduce
testimony
two
witnesses
impeach
testimony
one
deceased
witnesses
upon
ground
proper
foundation
laid
proceed
consideration
assignments
order
offense
alleged
indictment
committed
part
indian
territory
lying
north
canadian
river
east
texas
meridian
set
apart
occupied
cherokees
creeks
seminole
indian
tribes
section
act
january
stat
territory
expressly
declared
constitute
part
judicial
district
kansas
true
act
may
creating
territory
oklahoma
stat
jurisdiction
territory
question
vested
district
courts
territory
reservation
actions
commenced
courts
viz
courts
held
beyond
outside
limits
territory
crimes
committed
said
territory
cherokee
outlet
prior
passage
act
shall
tried
prosecuted
proceeded
finally
disposed
courts
jurisdiction
thereof
act
passed
homicide
question
committed
december
question
properly
cognizable
judicial
district
kansas
indeed
point
disposed
decision
caha
sup
also
opinion
error
remitting
indictment
circuit
trial
assuming
jurisdiction
entire
case
rev
requiring
indictments
capital
cases
presented
district
remitted
next
session
circuit
district
tried
application
case
since
subsequent
act
january
stat
already
called
attention
vests
district
courts
wichita
scott
district
kansas
original
jurisdiction
offenses
committed
within
limits
territory
hereby
annexed
said
district
kansas
laws
act
read
qualification
section
repeal
pro
tanto
requirement
indictments
shall
remitted
circuit
trial
district
said
original
jurisdiction
case
obliged
remit
another
trial
upon
trial
shown
government
two
witnesses
former
trial
namely
thomas
whitman
george
thornton
since
died
whereupon
transcribed
copy
reporter
stenographic
notes
testimony
upon
trial
supported
testimony
correct
admitted
read
evidence
constituted
strongest
proof
accused
witnesses
present
fully
examined
former
trial
claimed
however
constitutional
provision
accused
shall
confronted
witnesses
infringed
permitting
testimony
witnesses
sworn
upon
former
trial
read
question
made
may
done
civil
case
insisted
reasons
convenience
necessity
excuse
departure
ordinary
course
procedure
civil
cases
override
constitutional
provision
question
idea
done
seems
arisen
misinterpretation
ruling
case
sir
john
fenwick
tr
et
seq
proceeding
parliament
bill
attainder
upon
charge
high
treason
appeared
lady
fenwick
spirited
awsy
material
witness
sworn
one
cook
trial
treason
testimony
ruled
obviously
case
deceased
witness
one
opportunity
former
trial
parties
case
nevertheless
cited
peake
work
evidence
page
authority
proposition
testimony
deceased
witness
used
criminal
prosecution
rule
england
however
clearly
way
bull
king
jolliffe
term
king
radbourne
leach
cr
cas
rex
smith
starkie
buckworth
case
raym
practice
country
know
none
testimony
held
inadmissible
cases
finn
rand
mendum
rand
brogy
grat
witnesses
testified
former
trial
dead
state
testimony
held
appeals
virginia
inadmissible
though
argument
indicated
result
dead
case
state
atkins
overt
former
testimony
witness
since
deceased
rejected
tennessee
case
subsequently
overruled
kendrick
state
humph
testimony
deceased
witness
taken
committing
magistrate
held
admissible
see
also
johnston
state
yerg
bostick
state
humph
rule
california
formerly
admission
testimony
people
chue
cal
people
qurise
cal
admitted
special
provision
code
applicable
absent
deceased
witnesses
held
constitutional
people
oiler
cal
pac
case
state
campbell
rich
law
testimony
deceased
witness
taken
coroner
absence
accused
course
held
inadmissible
upon
hand
authority
favor
admissibility
testimony
defendant
present
either
examination
deceased
witness
committing
magistrate
upon
former
trial
case
overwhelming
question
carefully
considered
constitutional
aspect
judicial
massachusetts
com
richards
pick
said
provision
made
exclude
evidence
deposition
given
orally
presence
accused
intended
affect
question
competent
evidence
given
face
face
according
settled
rules
common
law
subject
also
treated
great
length
judge
drummond
macomb
mclean
fed
cas
substance
deceased
witness
testimony
given
preliminary
examination
held
admissible
cases
time
cited
opinion
decision
put
upon
ground
right
exercised
hardship
upon
defendant
allow
testimony
deceased
witness
read
following
list
cases
seen
doctrine
prevails
dozen
summons
state
ohio
brown
cases
question
elaborately
considered
state
mo
state
baker
id
state
houser
mo
learned
discussion
subject
state
able
mo
owens
state
miss
barnett
people
white
cranch
fed
cas
robinson
state
state
wilson
state
johnson
roberts
state
state
cook
la
ann
dunlap
state
tex
app
bush
state
hooker
crary
sprague
wend
wood
fed
cas
state
valentine
ired
precise
question
never
arisen
held
reynolds
witness
absent
procurement
connivance
defendant
condition
assert
constitutional
immunity
primary
object
constitutional
provision
question
prevent
depositions
ex
parte
affidavits
sometimes
admitted
civil
cases
used
prisoner
lieu
personal
examination
witness
accused
opportunity
testing
recollection
sifting
conscience
witness
compelling
stand
face
face
jury
order
may
look
judge
demeanor
upon
stand
manner
gives
testimony
whether
worthy
belief
doubtless
reason
saying
accused
never
lose
benefit
safeguards
even
death
witness
notes
testimony
permitted
read
deprived
advantage
personal
presence
witness
jury
law
designed
protection
general
rules
law
kind
however
beneficent
operation
valuable
accused
must
occasionally
give
way
considerations
public
policy
necessities
case
say
criminal
convicted
testimony
certain
witness
go
scot
free
simply
death
closed
mouth
witness
carrying
constitutional
protection
unwarrantable
extent
law
wisdom
declares
rights
public
shall
wholly
sacrificed
order
incidental
benefit
may
preserved
accused
bound
interpret
constitution
light
law
existed
time
adopted
reaching
new
guaranties
rights
citizen
securing
every
individual
already
possessed
british
subject
ancestors
inherited
defended
since
days
magna
charta
many
provisions
nature
bill
rights
subject
exceptions
recognized
long
adoption
constitution
interfering
spirit
exceptions
obviously
intended
respected
technical
adherence
letter
constitutional
provision
may
occasionally
carried
necessary
protection
accused
safety
public
warrant
instance
nothing
directly
contrary
letter
provision
question
admission
dying
declarations
rarely
made
presence
accused
made
without
opportunity
examination
witness
brought
face
face
jury
yet
time
immemorial
treated
competent
testimony
one
hardihood
day
question
admissibility
admitted
conformity
general
rule
regarding
admission
testimony
exception
rules
simply
necessities
case
prevent
manifest
failure
justice
said
chief
justice
case
upon
first
writ
error
sup
sense
impending
death
presumed
remove
temptation
falsehood
enforce
strict
adherence
truth
obligation
oath
declarations
admitted
made
person
dead
circumstances
give
statements
weight
made
oath
equal
greater
reason
admitting
testimony
statements
made
oath
substance
constitutional
protection
preserved
prisoner
advantage
seeing
witness
face
face
subjecting
ordeal
law
says
shall
circumstances
deprived
many
cases
hold
testimony
admissible
also
hold
substance
testimony
words
witness
shall
proven
wish
understood
expressing
opinion
upon
point
authorities
hold
copy
stenographic
report
entire
former
testimony
supported
oath
stenographer
correct
transcript
notes
testimony
deceased
witness
produced
case
competent
evidence
said
error
also
assigned
action
refusing
permit
defendant
introduce
testimony
two
impeach
testimony
whitman
one
deceased
witnesses
showing
statements
made
contradicting
evidence
upon
stand
upon
ground
proper
foundation
laid
interrogating
whitman
made
contradictory
statements
connection
defendant
proposed
prove
witness
james
whitman
told
november
see
mattox
night
shooting
dark
tell
shooting
next
day
told
testified
former
trial
false
wanted
leave
country
witness
go
see
mattox
friends
get
fifty
dollars
give
witness
take
five
leave
country
want
appear
mattox
sworn
true
also
sought
prove
witness
violet
january
whitman
said
emphatically
specifically
testimony
mattox
given
threats
made
corridors
courthouse
wichita
prior
called
witness
stand
approached
one
stiles
shook
finger
face
told
dared
utter
one
word
witness
stand
favor
defendant
mattox
stiles
see
sent
road
declaring
threats
testimony
given
objection
made
district
attorney
introduction
testimony
upon
ground
whitman
examined
examined
upon
former
trial
questions
propounded
witnesses
james
violet
purpose
impeachment
government
lost
opportunity
death
witness
whitman
putting
upon
stand
contradicting
facts
statements
whitman
defendant
proposed
prove
witnesses
james
violet
made
former
trial
proper
foundation
laid
asking
whitman
whether
made
statements
authorities
except
new
england
almost
unanimous
effect
witness
impeached
proof
made
statements
contradicting
differing
testimony
given
upon
stand
foundation
must
laid
interrogating
witness
whether
ever
made
statements
justice
witness
requires
asked
whether
ever
made
statements
attention
called
particular
statement
proposed
proven
asked
whether
time
place
made
statement
witness
whose
testimony
introduced
method
impeachment
approved
conrad
griffey
wherein
rule
stated
upon
common
sense
essential
protect
character
witness
memory
refreshed
necessary
inquiries
enable
explain
statements
referred
show
made
mistake
discrepancy
testimony
case
deposition
witness
taken
cause
sought
impeached
letter
witness
written
deposition
addressed
plaintiff
affidavit
annexed
date
general
rule
also
approved
charles
morgan
sup
although
particular
case
held
proper
foundation
laid
introduction
evidence
principle
also
approved
railway
artery
sup
insisted
however
rule
ceases
apply
witness
died
since
testimony
given
contradictory
statements
either
made
subsequent
giving
testimony
made
known
counsel
time
examined
contradictory
statements
admitted
party
affected
testimony
practically
mercy
witness
rule
requiring
foundation
laid
matter
form
enforced
works
manifest
hardship
upon
party
seeking
impeach
witness
authorities
however
recognize
distinction
true
wright
littler
burrows
dying
confession
subscribing
witness
deed
forged
instrument
admitted
lord
chief
justice
wiles
afterwards
approved
queen
bench
lord
mansfield
delivering
opinion
similar
evidence
admitted
aveson
kinnaird
east
authority
cases
seriously
shaken
stobart
dryden
mees
held
defendant
give
evidence
declarations
made
subscribing
witness
deed
since
died
tending
show
forged
fraudulently
altered
deed
connection
said
baron
parke
determine
question
propriety
admitting
proposed
evidence
ground
convenience
apart
consideration
expediency
abiding
general
rules
say
least
doubtful
whether
generally
speaking
cause
greater
mischief
advantage
investigation
truth
declarations
time
mouth
subscribing
witnesses
dead
admitted
evidence
result
security
solemn
instruments
much
impaired
rights
parties
wills
deeds
liable
affected
remote
periods
loose
deciarations
attesting
witnesses
parties
opportunity
contradicting
explaining
evidence
witnesses
party
impeaching
validity
instrument
true
equivalent
loss
power
living
witness
party
supporting
none
loss
power
examination
case
ayers
watson
sup
differs
principally
one
consideration
fact
civil
instead
criminal
case
action
ejectment
defendant
introduced
deposition
one
johnson
taken
surveyor
made
survey
land
question
deposition
twice
taken
used
upon
former
trials
prior
last
trial
died
plaintiff
rebuttal
offered
deposition
witness
taken
suit
parties
testimony
regard
matters
testified
deposition
offered
defendant
varied
materially
latter
depositions
deposition
held
inadmissible
justice
miller
ing
courts
liberal
giving
opposing
party
opportunity
present
witness
matter
propose
contradict
even
going
far
permit
recalled
subject
left
stand
believed
case
deliberately
held
witness
testimony
taken
committed
writing
used
death
placed
beyond
reach
power
explanation
another
trial
contradictory
declarations
whether
deposition
otherwise
used
impeach
testimony
least
seem
admissible
present
case
three
trials
jury
testimony
witness
johnson
introduced
relied
reference
made
former
deposition
attempt
call
attention
principle
rule
evidence
well
understood
authorities
necessary
cited
cases
state
courts
means
numerous
courts
far
spoken
upon
subject
unanimous
holding
fact
attendance
witness
procured
even
witness
dead
dispense
necessity
laying
proper
foundation
thus
stacey
graham
counsel
conceding
rule
relied
upon
two
circumstances
relieve
case
influence
first
attendance
witness
procured
time
trial
second
declarations
statements
offered
proved
made
witness
testified
direct
admission
sworn
falsely
held
statements
came
knowledge
counsel
afterwards
trial
duty
apply
commission
move
postponement
evidence
procured
mere
absence
witness
said
never
considered
reason
allowing
unsworn
statements
proved
order
affect
credibility
question
elaborately
considered
runyan
price
ohio
one
subscribing
witnesses
died
trial
testimony
taken
probate
read
evidence
contestants
offered
evidence
declarations
respecting
capacity
alleged
testator
make
time
one
question
purported
made
held
though
bare
majority
inadmissible
purpose
impeaching
testimony
seems
us
said
allow
death
witness
work
exception
destroy
principle
upon
rule
rests
deny
protection
designed
afford
relieving
one
party
supposed
hardship
equally
serious
one
might
inflicted
upon
without
therefore
opportunity
witness
explanation
party
offered
opinion
supposed
declarations
lack
element
credibility
possess
used
legitimately
destroy
testimony
witness
case
approved
subsequent
case
wroe
state
ohio
statement
person
alleged
murdered
manner
received
wound
statement
claimed
inconsistent
dying
declarations
ruled
upon
ground
neither
part
res
gestae
dying
declaration
held
incompetent
original
evidence
impeaching
testimony
admit
extent
afford
substitute
defendant
loss
deprive
deceased
state
opportunity
explanation
craft
held
testimony
witness
given
upon
former
trial
reproduced
witness
died
testimony
effect
witness
subsequent
former
trial
stated
evidence
given
trial
false
competent
rule
put
upon
ground
impeaching
statements
admitted
strong
temptation
fabrication
testimony
important
true
evidence
might
destroyed
hubbard
briggs
testimony
deceased
witness
given
former
trial
case
read
evidence
subsequently
defendant
offered
read
deposition
witness
chancery
suit
purpose
contradicting
evidence
read
impeaching
testimony
held
properly
ruled
foundation
laid
fact
witness
dead
held
change
rule
see
also
griffith
state
ark
unis
charlton
grat
kimball
davis
wend
wend
enforcement
rule
case
death
witness
subsequent
examination
may
work
occasional
hardship
depriving
party
opportunity
proving
contradictory
statements
relaxation
rule
cases
offer
temptation
perjury
fabrication
testimony
criminal
cases
especially
almost
irresistible
generally
understood
death
witness
opened
door
opposite
party
prove
made
statements
conficting
testimony
history
criminal
trials
leads
one
believe
witnesses
forthcoming
painful
frequency
make
desired
proof
fact
one
party
lost
power
contradicting
adversary
witness
really
greater
hardship
fact
adversary
lost
opportunity
recalling
witness
explaining
testimony
quite
much
danger
injustice
one
party
admitting
testimony
excluding
respective
advantages
disadvantages
relaxation
rule
problematical
courts
great
uniformity
refused
recognize
exception
error
action
judgment
therefore
affirmed
justice
shiras
dissenting
concurred
justice
gray
justice
white
clyde
mattox
plaintiff
error
tried
convicted
murder
first
degree
september
term
district
district
kansas
prosecuted
writ
error
judgment
lower
reversed
case
remanded
new
trial
subsequent
term
second
trial
resulted
disagreement
jury
december
term
plaintiff
error
put
upon
third
trial
found
guilty
upon
judgment
condemning
death
present
writ
error
taken
last
trial
case
governor
proved
two
witnesses
first
trial
thomas
whitman
george
thornton
died
subsequently
thereto
introduced
evidence
objection
defendant
notes
testimony
taken
stenographer
prior
trial
defendant
offered
show
two
witnesses
whitman
deceased
witness
whose
testimony
preserved
notes
stenographer
necessary
secure
conviction
former
trial
two
distinct
occasions
stated
testimony
former
trial
given
duress
untrue
essential
particulars
government
objected
evidence
ground
usual
foundation
laid
impeachment
witness
attention
called
alleged
contradictory
statements
death
witness
disabled
government
denying
explaining
statements
attributed
action
sustaining
objection
government
refusing
admit
impeaching
testimony
subject
discussion
opinion
doubtless
general
rule
trial
civil
criminal
cases
testimony
introduced
discredit
witness
showing
another
time
place
made
statements
inconsistent
made
trial
must
asked
whether
made
statements
give
witness
opportunity
either
deny
made
statements
attributed
explain
showing
statements
though
made
reconcilable
testimony
perhaps
withdraw
modify
testimony
light
refreshed
recollection
general
rule
universal
one
prevail
courts
high
authority
wharton
correctly
says
maine
massachusetts
rule
enforced
pennsylvania
left
discretion
judge
trying
case
observe
whart
cr
law
tucker
welsh
mass
subject
discussed
judicial
massachusetts
referring
queen
case
brod
declined
follow
rule
laid
held
credit
witness
testified
orally
giving
deposition
may
impeached
showing
made
different
statement
either
given
testimony
necessary
impeached
witness
first
inquired
different
statement
present
credit
impeached
shall
take
occasion
hereafter
advert
observation
made
chief
justice
parker
course
opinion
subject
also
considered
connecticut
case
hedge
clapp
declined
accept
rule
queen
case
preferring
course
followed
massachusetts
clearly
shown
opinion
rule
substantive
rule
law
evidence
merely
one
practice
state
says
chief
justice
church
believe
uniformity
usage
conducting
examination
witnesses
made
contradictory
statements
since
queen
case
although
time
contradiction
witness
might
proved
without
qualification
conclude
therefore
legal
profession
never
considered
law
subject
fixed
treated
subject
rather
matter
practice
examination
witnesses
subject
discretion
well
see
unyielding
rule
prescribed
conformity
rule
claimed
shall
apply
consistently
cases
however
must
conceded
rule
approved
several
cases
cited
majority
opinion
conrad
griffey
letter
written
six
years
deposition
taken
letter
offered
discredit
said
probable
lapse
many
years
letter
mind
witness
deposition
sworn
rule
requiring
attention
witness
called
prior
contradictory
statements
salutary
one
dispensed
courts
question
consideration
whether
general
rule
whether
subject
exceptions
particularly
whether
facts
present
case
justify
departure
rule
examination
authorities
show
think
current
weight
decision
preclude
dealing
question
open
one
case
ayers
watson
sup
referred
majority
opinion
differing
present
one
fact
civil
instead
criminal
case
indeed
true
civil
case
unimportant
difference
another
feature
case
deprives
force
precedent
guidance
question
considering
case
action
ejectment
went
several
trials
deposition
one
johnson
surveyor
taken
introduced
one
parties
deposition
twice
taken
used
upon
former
trials
prior
last
trial
witness
died
last
trial
opposite
party
offered
rebuttal
deposition
witness
taken
suit
parties
contained
statements
materially
different
contained
later
depositions
held
johnson
deposition
three
trials
introduced
relied
reference
made
former
deposition
attempt
call
attention
prior
deposition
used
death
impeach
testimony
said
principle
rule
evidence
well
understood
authorities
necessary
cited
apparent
case
opposing
party
less
three
opportunities
call
attention
witness
existence
prior
deposition
upon
present
case
contradictory
statements
sought
proved
made
till
prior
trials
therefore
opportunity
time
defendant
call
witness
attention
statements
examine
upon
case
ayers
watson
therefore
fairly
regarded
point
decision
cited
circuit
courts
english
cases
cited
three
littler
burrows
aveson
kinnaird
east
stobart
dryden
mees
two
former
held
confessions
subscribing
witness
deed
forged
deed
admitted
evidence
trial
death
latter
confession
admitted
reasons
given
excluding
testimony
seem
chiefly
based
upon
impolicy
permitting
security
solemn
instruments
impaired
loose
declarations
attesting
witnesses
perhaps
partly
upon
general
grounds
public
policy
mentioned
lord
mansfield
walton
shelley
term
said
consequence
mankind
person
hang
false
colors
deceive
first
affixing
signature
paper
afterwards
giving
testimony
invalidate
therefore
clear
neither
decision
reasons
given
support
furnish
answer
present
inquiry
decisions
state
courts
cited
seem
little
bearing
exact
question
discussing
stacey
graham
case
witness
whose
testimony
proposed
contradict
declarations
made
elsewhere
dead
merely
absent
room
said
mere
absence
witness
never
considered
reason
allowing
unsworn
statements
proved
order
affect
credibility
case
therefore
merely
application
general
rule
runyan
price
ohio
held
three
judges
two
civil
case
testimony
deceased
witness
impeached
giving
evidence
declarations
alleged
made
differing
contained
testimony
wroe
state
ohio
case
statements
made
deceased
person
manner
received
fatal
wound
ruled
neither
res
gestae
dying
declarations
craft
case
majority
opinion
runyan
price
cited
followed
testimony
offered
contradict
deceased
witness
subsequent
declarations
examined
excluded
hubbard
briggs
unsuccessfully
sought
impeach
witness
testified
former
trial
case
afterwards
died
offering
deposition
taken
years
chancery
suit
different
parties
civil
suit
stipulation
parties
evidence
witness
might
read
gave
former
trial
decision
sustained
obvious
principles
apart
question
hand
griffith
state
ark
case
arkansas
recognized
general
rule
competent
contradict
witness
evidence
declarations
made
without
directing
attention
subject
said
ruled
impeachment
evidence
offered
trial
appear
statement
deceased
witness
made
reduced
writing
magistrate
attention
directed
time
place
antecedent
declarations
may
may
though
strictly
ruling
right
might
safer
case
involving
liberty
give
accused
benefit
doubt
unis
charlton
grat
merely
case
illustrating
general
rule
bearing
problem
kimball
davis
wend
effect
living
witness
whose
testimony
taken
deposition
contradicted
subsequent
declarations
respect
way
party
avail
declarations
sue
second
commission
obviously
merely
recognition
general
rule
touch
present
case
entire
array
cases
cited
seems
resolve
two
cases
question
directly
considered
decided
runyan
price
ohio
civil
case
ruled
divided
craft
hedge
clapp
heretofore
cited
said
rule
laid
queen
case
one
well
adhere
yet
subject
exceptions
sound
discretion
may
time
time
suggest
chief
justice
parker
tucker
welsh
mass
said
suggested
admitting
evidence
proper
impeach
witness
upon
stand
allowed
impeach
deposition
witness
absent
opportunity
deny
explain
witness
testified
upon
stand
hears
true
evidence
tends
impeach
may
called
back
purpose
absent
evidence
goes
affect
credibility
deposition
material
give
time
principal
witness
appear
depositions
taken
relative
facts
proved
impeach
may
sometimes
ient
justice
requires
delay
given
suppose
witness
testified
afterwards
acknowledge
falsity
statements
die
party
interested
testimony
might
upon
another
trial
prove
said
upon
stand
oath
shall
party
permitted
prove
said
falsehood
fletcher
fletcher
la
ann
rule
queen
case
approved
testimony
impeach
witness
showing
contradictory
statements
ruled
necessary
foundation
laid
fletcher
henley
la
ann
evidence
admitted
shown
seasonable
fruitless
effort
made
examine
witness
alleged
contradictory
statements
taking
commission
purpose
return
commissioner
showed
found
brief
review
authorities
suffices
show
question
shape
presented
never
heretofore
considered
decided
uniform
current
decisions
courts
constrain
us
follow
finding
decisive
rule
authorities
coming
regard
question
one
reason
obvious
dealing
doctrine
law
prescribed
statute
long
course
judicial
decisions
mere
rule
procedure
undoubtedly
credit
witnesses
testifying
oath
assailed
evidence
statements
made
elsewhere
without
affording
practicable
justice
party
calling
opportunity
deny
explain
admit
must
overlooked
primary
object
trial
vindicate
truth
consistency
witnesses
determine
guilt
innocence
accused
evidence
tending
show
testimony
essential
witness
relied
made
contradictory
statements
elsewhere
times
valid
admissible
authorities
concede
right
put
evidence
destroyed
incidental
fact
witness
reason
death
produced
deny
admit
made
statements
necessity
call
relaxation
rule
case
books
disclose
many
instances
rules
evidence
much
fundamental
one
treating
dispensed
overruling
necessity
thus
rule
excluded
parties
witnesses
departed
deemed
essential
purposes
justice
clark
spence
watts
said
party
competent
testify
cause
like
every
general
rule
exceptions
necessity
etither
physical
moral
dispenses
ordinary
rules
evidence
cases
common
carriers
owner
admitted
ex
necessitate
testify
contents
value
boxes
opened
rifled
see
cases
cited
greenl
ev
author
sums
cases
stating
law
force
evidence
person
interest
rules
common
law
respecting
evidence
general
presumed
laid
aside
rather
subordinate
silenced
transcendent
universal
rule
cases
evidence
good
nature
subject
presumes
none
better
obtainable
murphy
pet
owner
property
alleged
stolen
board
american
vessel
high
seas
held
competent
witness
prove
ownership
property
stolen
saying
general
rule
undoubtedly
criminal
cases
well
civil
cases
person
interested
event
suit
prosecution
competent
witness
many
exceptions
old
rule
thus
stated
lord
chief
baron
gilbert
clear
exception
statute
receive
execution
unless
party
interested
witness
must
allowed
statute
must
rendered
ineffectual
impossibility
proof
need
go
beyond
case
us
striking
illustration
fact
rules
evidence
even
founded
constitutional
provision
may
modified
relaxed
necessities
case
require
government
proceed
third
trial
without
producing
testimony
thomas
whitman
george
thornton
witnesses
died
since
prior
trials
government
driven
rely
upon
stenographer
notes
testimony
objected
behalf
accused
constitution
provides
criminal
prosecutions
accused
shall
enjoy
right
confronted
witnesses
contended
word
simply
secure
accused
privilege
examining
witnesses
behalf
affirmance
rule
common
law
trials
jury
witness
must
present
jury
accused
may
confronted
put
fact
face
opinion
majority
disposes
objection
saying
primary
object
constitutional
provision
question
prevent
depositions
ex
parte
affidavits
sometimes
admitted
civil
cases
used
prisoner
lieu
personal
examination
witness
accused
opportunity
testing
recollection
sifting
conscience
witness
compelling
stand
face
face
jury
order
may
look
judge
demeanor
upon
stand
manner
gives
testimony
whether
worthy
beleif
doubtless
reason
saying
accused
never
lose
benefit
safeguards
even
death
witness
notes
testimony
permitted
read
deprived
advantage
personal
presence
witness
jury
law
designed
protection
general
rules
law
kind
however
beneficent
operation
valuable
accused
must
occasionally
give
way
considerations
public
policy
necessities
case
right
accused
confront
witnesses
although
formally
secured
express
terms
constitution
importance
value
recognized
may
dispensed
death
witness
seem
justly
follow
neither
death
deprive
accused
right
put
evidence
valid
competent
nature
show
witness
unworthy
belief
become
convinced
trial
mistaken
argued
permit
evidence
statements
made
witness
contradictory
testimony
strong
temptation
fabrication
evidence
important
true
evidence
might
destroyed
argument
overlooks
fact
witnesses
introduced
testify
contradictory
statements
witnesses
liable
indictment
perjury
testify
sanction
oath
liability
punishment
bearing
false
witness
hand
witness
notes
whose
testimony
relied
sufficient
secure
conviction
accused
longer
within
reach
human
justice
conclude
rule
witness
must
contradictory
statements
given
evidence
impeach
credit
rule
convenient
orderly
practice
rule
competency
evidence
press
rule
far
exclude
proof
contradictory
statements
made
witness
since
former
trial
case
witness
dead
party
offering
proof
never
statements
sacrifice
substance
proof
orderliness
procedure
rights
living
party
consideration
deceased
witness
according
rulings
death
witness
deprived
accused
opportunity
conflicting
statements
loss
opportunity
deprived
accused
right
impeach
witness
independent
proof
statements
thus
death
witness
deprive
government
benefit
testimony
accused
deprive
latter
right
prove
testimony
witness
untrustworthy
ruling
rejected
evidence
positive
character
testified
witnesses
produced
examined
jury
upon
mere
conjecture
deceased
witness
might
alive
reiterate
former
testimony
seem
wiser
policy
give
accused
benefit
evidence
competent
character
reject
sake
supposition
doubtful
judgment
reversed
cause
remanded
directions
set
aside
verdict
award
new
trial