bailey
argued
november
decided
january
together
cogdell
also
certiorari
see
rule
upon
apprehended
escape
district
columbia
jail
respondents
indicted
violating
governs
escape
federal
custody
trial
respondents
cooley
bailey
walker
district
respondents
adduced
evidence
conditions
jail
reasons
returning
custody
rejected
proffered
jury
instruction
duress
defense
ruling
failed
matter
law
present
evidence
sufficient
support
defense
turned
escaped
allegedly
coercive
conditions
receiving
instructions
disregard
evidence
jail
conditions
jury
convicted
respondents
violating
respondent
cogdell
trial
district
ruled
absent
testimony
time
escape
apprehension
present
evidence
conditions
jail
also
convicted
jury
violating
appeals
reversed
respondent
conviction
remanded
new
trials
holding
district
allowed
respective
juries
consider
evidence
coercive
conditions
jail
determining
whether
respondents
formulated
requisite
intent
sustain
conviction
required
prosecution
prove
particular
defendant
left
federal
custody
voluntarily
without
permission
intent
avoid
confinement
escapee
acting
requisite
intent
escaped
order
avoid
conditions
opposed
normal
aspects
confinement
held
since
respondents
indicted
fleeing
escaping
certain
date
leaving
staying
away
custody
since
jury
instructions
gave
impression
respondents
tried
leaving
jail
certain
date
failing
return
later
date
neither
respondents
juries
acquainted
proposition
escapes
question
continuing
offenses
omission
constituted
violation
respondents
right
jury
trial
held
prosecution
fulfills
burden
demonstrates
escapee
knew
actions
result
leaving
physical
confinement
without
permission
nothing
language
legislative
history
indicates
congress
intended
require
heightened
standard
culpability
narrow
definition
confinement
appeals
required
pp
order
entitled
instruction
duress
necessity
defense
charge
escape
escapee
must
first
offer
evidence
justifying
continued
absence
custody
well
initial
departure
indispensable
element
offer
testimony
bona
fide
effort
surrender
return
custody
soon
claimed
duress
necessity
lost
coercive
force
record
evidence
testimony
lacking
hence
respondents
entitled
instruction
duress
necessity
pp
escape
federal
custody
defined
continuing
offense
escapee
held
liable
failure
return
custody
well
initial
departure
pp
significant
variance
indictments
merely
respondents
indicted
theory
escape
continuing
offense
district
explain
theory
juries
indictments
tracked
closely
language
sufficient
standard
deeming
indictment
sufficient
first
contains
elements
offense
charged
fairly
informs
defendant
charge
must
defend
second
enables
plead
acquittal
conviction
bar
future
prosecutions
offense
hamling
unnecessary
district
elaborate
juries
benefit
continuing
nature
charged
offense
evidence
failed
matter
law
crucial
particular
reach
minimum
threshold
required
instruction
respondents
theory
case
generally
pp
affirmative
defense
consists
several
elements
testimony
supporting
one
element
insufficient
sustain
even
believed
trial
jury
need
burdened
testimony
supporting
elements
defense
held
juries
cases
subjected
potpourri
evidence
jail
conditions
even
though
critical
element
proffered
defense
duress
necessity
absent
every
trial
converted
hearing
current
state
federal
penal
system
pp
rehnquist
delivered
opinion
burger
stewart
white
powell
stevens
joined
stevens
filed
concurring
opinion
post
blackmun
filed
dissenting
opinion
brennan
joined
post
marshall
took
part
consideration
decision
cases
edwin
kneedler
argued
cause
briefs
solicitor
general
mccree
assistant
attorney
general
heymann
kenneth
geller
jerome
feit
john
depue
richard
kohn
argued
cause
respondents
brief
john
townsend
rich
robert
robbins
dorothy
sellers
justice
rehnquist
delivered
opinion
early
morning
hours
august
respondents
clifford
bailey
james
cogdell
ronald
cooley
ralph
walker
federal
prisoners
district
columbia
jail
crawled
window
bar
removed
slid
knotted
bedsheet
escaped
custody
federal
authorities
recaptured
remained
large
period
time
ranging
one
month
three
months
upon
apprehension
charged
violating
governs
escape
federal
custody
trials
respondents
adduced
offered
adduce
evidence
various
conditions
events
district
columbia
jail
convicted
jury
appeals
district
columbia
circuit
reversed
convictions
divided
vote
holding
district
improperly
precluded
consideration
respective
juries
respondents
tendered
evidence
granted
certiorari
reverse
judgments
appeals
reaching
conclusion
must
decide
state
mind
necessary
violation
elements
constitute
defenses
duress
necessity
explaining
reasons
decision
find
position
akin
mother
crab
trying
teach
progeny
walk
straight
line
finally
desperation
exclaims
say
act
congress
construe
consists
one
sentence
set
forth
margin
supra
pragmatic
estimate
expressed
infra
general
trials
violations
simple
affairs
yet
written
reluctantly
believe
necessarily
somewhat
lengthy
opinion
supporting
conclusion
enacting
federal
criminal
code
congress
legislated
light
long
history
case
law
frequently
relevant
fleshing
bare
bones
crime
congress
may
proscribed
single
sentence
see
morissette
respondents
requested
jury
trials
initially
scheduled
tried
jointly
last
minute
however
respondent
cogdell
secured
severance
district
refused
submit
jury
instructions
respondents
defense
duress
necessity
charge
jury
escape
continuing
offense
must
examine
detail
evidence
brought
trial
prosecution
case
chief
bailey
cooley
walker
brief
government
introduced
evidence
respondents
federal
custody
august
disappeared
apparently
cell
window
approximately
date
apprehended
individually
september
december
respondents
defense
duress
necessity
centered
conditions
jail
months
june
july
august
various
threats
beatings
directed
period
describing
conditions
jail
introduced
evidence
frequent
fires
northeast
one
cellblock
occupied
respondents
prior
escape
construed
light
favorable
evidence
demonstrated
inmates
northeast
one
occasion
guards
unit
set
fire
trash
bedding
objects
thrown
cells
according
inmates
guards
simply
allowed
fires
burn
went
although
fires
apparently
confined
small
areas
posed
substantial
threat
spreading
complex
poor
ventilation
caused
smoke
collect
linger
cellblock
respondents
cooley
bailey
also
introduced
testimony
guards
jail
subjected
beatings
threats
death
walker
attempted
prove
epileptic
received
inadequate
medical
attention
seizures
consistently
trial
district
stressed
sustain
defenses
respondents
introduce
evidence
attempted
surrender
engaged
equivalent
conduct
freed
conditions
described
waited
evidence
vain
respondent
cooley
eluded
authorities
one
month
testified
people
tried
contact
authorities
never
got
touch
anybody
app
also
suggested
someone
told
sister
federal
bureau
investigation
kill
apprehended
respondent
bailey
apprehended
november
told
similar
story
stated
jail
officials
called
several
times
turn
still
threats
death
like
cooley
bailey
testified
fbi
telling
people
going
shoot
respondent
walker
suggested
attempted
negotiate
surrender
like
cooley
bailey
walker
testified
fbi
told
people
kill
recaptured
nevertheless
according
walker
called
fbi
three
times
spoke
agent
whose
name
remember
agent
allegedly
assured
fbi
harm
unable
promise
walker
returned
jail
walker
testified
last
called
fbi
finally
apprehended
december
close
evidence
district
rejected
respondents
proffered
instruction
duress
defense
prison
escape
ruled
respondents
failed
matter
law
present
evidence
sufficient
support
defense
turned
escaped
allegedly
coercive
conditions
receiving
instructions
disregard
evidence
conditions
jail
jury
convicted
bailey
cooley
walker
violating
two
months
later
respondent
cogdell
came
trial
district
judge
presided
trial
cogdell
attempted
offer
testimony
concerning
allegedly
inhumane
conditions
jail
district
judge
inquired
cogdell
conduct
escape
august
apprehension
september
response
cogdell
assertion
may
written
letters
district
specified
cogdell
testify
ot
may
done
app
absent
testimony
however
district
ruled
cogdell
present
evidence
conditions
jail
cogdell
subsequently
chose
testify
behalf
convicted
jury
violating
divided
vote
appeals
reversed
respondent
conviction
remanded
new
trials
see
app
app
majority
concluded
district
allowed
jury
consider
evidence
coercive
conditions
determining
whether
respondents
formulated
requisite
intent
sustain
conviction
according
majority
required
prosecution
prove
particular
defendant
left
federal
custody
voluntarily
without
permission
intent
avoid
confinement
app
majority
defined
word
confinement
encompassing
normal
aspects
punishment
prescribed
legal
system
thus
prisoner
escapes
order
avoid
conditions
beatings
homosexual
attacks
necessarily
requisite
intent
sustain
conviction
according
majority
defendant
introduces
evidence
subject
conditions
crucial
factual
determination
intent
issue
whether
defendant
left
custody
avoid
conditions
whether
addition
defendant
also
intended
avoid
confinement
making
determination
jury
guided
trial
instructions
pointing
factors
indicative
presence
absence
intent
avoid
confinement
app
emphasis
original
dissenting
judge
objected
characterized
revolutionary
reinterpretation
criminal
law
majority
argued
crime
escape
traditionally
required
general
intent
mental
state
sophisticated
intent
go
beyond
permitted
limits
emphasis
deleted
dissent
concluded
district
properly
removed
consideration
respondent
contention
conditions
events
jail
justified
escape
respondent
introduced
evidence
whatsoever
justifying
continued
absence
jail
following
escape
ii
criminal
liability
normally
based
upon
concurrence
two
factors
mind
hand
morissette
present
case
must
examine
mental
element
mens
rea
required
conviction
circumstances
hand
avoid
liability
section
coercive
conditions
necessity
negates
conclusion
guilt
even
though
necessary
mens
rea
present
areas
criminal
law
pose
difficulty
proper
definition
mens
rea
required
particular
crime
national
commission
reform
federal
criminal
laws
decried
confused
inconsistent
ad
hoc
approach
federal
courts
issue
called
new
departure
see
working
papers
national
commission
reform
federal
criminal
laws
hereinafter
working
papers
although
central
focus
reform
movements
codification
workable
principles
determining
criminal
culpability
see
american
law
institute
model
penal
code
prop
draft
hereinafter
model
penal
code
byproduct
general
rethinking
traditional
mens
rea
analysis
common
law
crimes
generally
classified
requiring
either
general
intent
specific
intent
venerable
distinction
however
source
good
deal
confusion
one
treatise
explained
sometimes
general
intent
used
way
criminal
intent
mean
general
notion
mens
rea
specific
intent
taken
mean
mental
state
required
particular
crime
general
intent
may
used
encompass
forms
mental
state
requirement
specific
intent
limited
one
mental
state
intent
another
possibility
general
intent
used
characterize
intent
something
undetermined
occasion
specific
intent
denote
intent
thing
particular
time
place
lafave
scott
handbook
criminal
law
pp
footnotes
omitted
hereinafter
lafave
scott
case
crimes
limited
distinction
knowledge
purpose
considered
important
since
good
reason
imposing
liability
whether
defendant
desired
merely
knew
practical
certainty
results
gypsum
supra
quoting
lafave
scott
thus
gypsum
held
person
held
criminally
liable
sherman
act
person
exchanged
price
information
competitor
either
knowledge
exchange
unreasonable
anticompetitive
effects
purpose
producing
effects
certain
narrow
classes
crimes
however
heightened
culpability
thought
merit
special
attention
thus
statutory
common
law
homicide
often
distinguishes
either
setting
degree
crime
imposing
punishment
person
knows
another
person
killed
result
conduct
person
acts
specific
purpose
taking
another
life
see
lafave
scott
similarly
defendant
charged
treason
stated
government
must
demonstrate
defendant
acted
purpose
aid
enemy
see
haupt
another
example
law
inchoate
offenses
attempt
conspiracy
heightened
mental
state
separates
criminality
otherwise
innocuous
behavior
see
model
penal
code
comments
tent
draft
hereinafter
mpc
comments
general
sense
purpose
corresponds
loosely
concept
specific
intent
knowledge
corresponds
loosely
concept
general
intent
see
ibid
lafave
scott
substitution
terms
innovation
offered
reformers
hardly
dramatic
another
ambiguity
inherent
traditional
distinction
specific
intent
general
intent
generally
even
crimes
consist
several
elements
complex
statutorily
defined
crimes
exhibit
characteristic
even
greater
degree
state
mind
required
actor
element
crime
may
elements
require
one
state
mind
another
feola
example
asked
decide
whether
government
sustain
conviction
assaulting
federal
officer
prove
defendant
knew
victim
federal
officer
looking
legislative
history
concluded
congress
intended
require
intent
assault
intent
assault
federal
officer
feola
implied
american
law
institute
stated
lear
analysis
requires
question
kind
culpability
required
establish
commission
offense
faced
separately
respect
material
element
crime
mpc
comments
see
also
working
papers
lafave
scott
dissecting
assigning
level
culpability
element
believe
two
observations
order
first
performing
analysis
courts
obviously
must
follow
congress
intent
required
level
mental
culpability
particular
offense
principles
derived
common
law
well
precepts
suggested
american
law
institute
must
bow
legislative
mandates
case
however
neither
language
statute
legislative
history
mentions
mens
rea
required
conviction
second
suggested
analysis
useful
tool
making
sense
otherwise
opaque
concept
principle
considered
administration
federal
system
criminal
justice
confided
ordinary
mortals
whether
lawyers
judges
jurors
system
easily
fall
weight
courts
scholars
become
obsessed
distinctions
either
traditional
novel
congress
neither
stated
implied
made
conduct
criminal
relevant
charges
bailey
cooley
walker
required
prosecution
prove
custody
attorney
general
result
conviction
escaped
custody
charges
respondent
cogdell
required
proof
exception
confinement
based
upon
arrest
felony
rather
prior
conviction
although
define
term
escape
courts
commentators
general
agreement
means
absenting
oneself
custody
without
permission
see
app
wilkey
dissenting
wilke
cert
denied
see
also
bishop
criminal
law
ed
burdick
law
crime
perkins
criminal
law
wharton
criminal
law
ed
respondents
challenged
district
instructions
first
two
elements
crime
defined
undisputed
august
respondents
custody
attorney
general
result
either
arrest
charges
felony
conviction
element
escape
need
decide
whether
person
convicted
evidence
recklessness
negligence
respect
limits
freedom
may
someday
confront
case
escapee
know
known
exceeding
bounds
confinement
leaving
without
permission
district
clearly
instructed
juries
prosecution
bore
burden
proving
respondents
knowingly
committed
act
law
makes
crime
acted
knowingly
intentionally
deliberately
app
minimum
juries
find
respondents
knew
leaving
jail
knew
without
authorization
sufficiency
evidence
support
juries
verdicts
charge
never
seriously
questioned
majority
appeals
however
imposed
added
burden
prosecution
prove
part
case
chief
respondents
acted
intent
avoid
confinement
reasons
noted
word
intent
quite
ambiguous
majority
left
little
doubt
requiring
government
prove
respondents
acted
purpose
conscious
objective
leaving
jail
without
authorization
explaining
holding
example
majority
specified
escapee
act
requisite
intent
escaped
order
avoid
conditions
opposed
normal
aspects
confinement
app
find
majority
position
quite
unsupportable
nothing
language
legislative
history
indicates
congress
intended
require
either
heightened
standard
culpability
narrow
definition
confinement
stated
earlier
cases
generally
held
except
narrow
classes
offenses
proof
defendant
acted
knowingly
sufficient
support
conviction
accordingly
hold
prosecution
fulfills
burden
demonstrates
escapee
knew
actions
result
leaving
physical
confinement
without
permission
holding
respect
comports
parallel
definitions
crime
escape
model
penal
code
proposed
revision
federal
criminal
code
see
model
penal
code
report
senate
committee
judiciary
accompany
pp
comm
print
moreover
comments
accompanying
proposed
revision
federal
criminal
code
specified
new
provision
covering
escape
substantially
carrie
forward
existing
law
respondents
also
contend
entitled
new
trial
presented
cogdell
case
presented
sufficient
evidence
duress
necessity
submit
defense
jury
majority
confront
claim
squarely
holding
instead
extent
defense
normally
barred
prisoner
failure
return
custody
neither
indictment
jury
instructions
adequately
described
requirement
see
app
common
law
historically
distinguished
defenses
duress
necessity
duress
said
excuse
criminal
conduct
actor
unlawful
threat
imminent
death
serious
bodily
injury
threat
caused
actor
engage
conduct
violating
literal
terms
criminal
law
defense
duress
covered
situation
coercion
source
actions
human
beings
defense
necessity
choice
evils
traditionally
covered
situation
physical
forces
beyond
actor
control
rendered
illegal
conduct
lesser
two
evils
thus
destroyed
dike
threatened
kill
argue
acted
duress
whereas
destroyed
dike
order
protect
valuable
property
flooding
claim
defense
necessity
see
generally
lafave
scott
modern
cases
tended
blur
distinction
duress
necessity
majority
discarded
labels
duress
necessity
choosing
instead
examine
policies
underlying
traditional
defenses
see
app
particular
majority
felt
defenses
designed
spare
person
punishment
acted
threats
conditions
person
ordinary
firmness
unable
resist
reasonably
believed
criminal
action
necessary
avoid
harm
serious
sought
prevented
statute
defining
offense
model
penal
code
redefines
defenses
along
similar
lines
see
model
penal
code
duress
choice
evils
need
speculate
however
precise
contours
whatever
defenses
duress
necessity
available
charges
brought
definition
defenses
one
principle
remains
constant
reasonable
legal
alternative
violating
law
chance
refuse
criminal
act
also
avoid
threatened
harm
defenses
fail
lafave
scott
clearly
context
prison
escape
escapee
entitled
claim
defense
duress
necessity
unless
demonstrates
given
imminence
threat
violation
reasonable
alternative
see
boomer
cert
denied
sub
nom
heft
people
richards
cal
app
cal
rptr
present
case
government
contends
respondents
showing
insufficient
two
grounds
first
government
asserts
threats
conditions
cited
respondents
justifying
escape
sufficiently
immediate
serious
justify
departure
lawful
custody
second
government
contends
respondents
escaped
coercive
conditions
jail
longer
threat
respondents
duty
terminate
status
fugitives
turning
authorities
respondents
hand
argue
evidence
coercion
conditions
jail
least
sufficient
go
jury
affirmative
defense
crime
charged
failure
return
custody
gaining
freedom
respondents
assert
failure
one
factor
overall
determination
whether
initial
departure
justified
according
respondents
failure
surrender
may
reflect
adversely
bona
fides
motivation
leaving
jail
withdraw
question
motivation
jury
consideration
brief
respondents
see
also
supra
need
decide
whether
evidence
submitted
respondents
sufficient
raise
jury
question
initial
departures
decline
hold
respondents
failure
return
one
factor
jury
weigh
deciding
whether
initial
escape
affirmatively
justified
contrary
several
considerations
lead
us
conclude
order
entitled
instruction
duress
necessity
defense
crime
charged
escapee
must
first
offer
evidence
justifying
continued
absence
custody
well
initial
departure
indispensable
element
offer
testimony
bona
fide
effort
surrender
return
custody
soon
claimed
duress
necessity
lost
coercive
force
first
think
clear
beyond
peradventure
escape
federal
custody
defined
continuing
offense
escapee
held
liable
failure
return
custody
well
initial
departure
given
continuing
threat
society
posed
escaped
prisoner
nature
crime
involved
congress
must
assuredly
intended
treated
continuing
one
toussie
moreover
every
federal
considered
issue
held
either
explicitly
implicitly
defines
continuing
offense
see
michelson
cluck
cert
denied
joiner
cert
denied
chapman
respondents
point
toussie
calls
restraint
labeling
crimes
continuing
offenses
justification
restraint
however
tension
doctrine
continuing
offenses
policy
repose
embodied
statutes
limitations
see
tension
wholly
absent
case
statute
limitations
tolled
period
escapee
remains
large
remaining
considerations
leading
conclusion
perhaps
ironically
derived
concern
statutory
constitutional
right
jury
trial
upon
majority
appeals
based
reasoning
significant
variance
indictment
merely
respondents
indicted
theory
escape
continuing
offense
district
explain
theory
juries
held
several
occasions
indictment
sufficient
first
contains
elements
offense
charged
fairly
informs
defendant
charge
must
defend
second
enables
plead
acquittal
conviction
bar
future
prosecutions
offense
hamling
indictments
track
closely
language
undoubtedly
sufficient
standard
see
alleged
failure
district
elaborate
benefit
jury
continuing
nature
charged
offense
believe
elaboration
unnecessary
evidence
failed
matter
law
crucial
particular
reach
minimum
threshold
required
instruction
respondents
theory
case
generally
tradition
criminal
justice
embodied
constitution
federal
statutes
makes
jurors
judges
credibility
testimony
offered
witnesses
generally
appellate
courts
say
particular
witness
spoke
truth
fabricated
story
escapee
flees
jail
process
burning
ground
may
well
entitled
instruction
duress
necessity
hanged
stay
burnt
kirby
wall
federal
system
jury
judge
whether
prisoner
account
reason
flight
true
false
precisely
defendant
entitled
credibility
testimony
witnesses
called
behalf
judged
jury
essential
testimony
given
proffered
meet
minimum
standard
element
defense
jury
finds
true
support
affirmative
defense
duress
necessity
therefore
hold
criminal
defendant
charged
escape
claims
entitled
instruction
theory
duress
necessity
must
proffer
evidence
bona
fide
effort
surrender
return
custody
soon
claimed
duress
necessity
lost
coercive
force
reviewed
evidence
examined
elaborately
majority
dissenting
opinions
find
case
even
close
even
respondents
versions
facts
whether
either
surrendered
offered
surrender
earliest
possible
opportunity
since
determined
indispensable
element
defense
duress
necessity
respondents
entitled
instruction
theory
vague
necessarily
statements
defendants
witnesses
future
good
intentions
ambiguous
conduct
simply
support
finding
element
defense
iii
reversing
judgments
appeals
believe
least
faithful
majority
expressed
policy
allowing
jury
perform
accustomed
role
arbiter
factual
disputes
app
requirement
threshold
showing
part
assert
affirmative
defense
crime
means
derogation
importance
jury
judge
credibility
based
distrust
jury
ability
separate
fact
fiction
contrary
testament
importance
trial
jury
need
husband
resources
necessary
process
limiting
evidence
trial
directed
elements
crime
affirmative
defenses
hold
affirmative
defense
consists
several
elements
testimony
supporting
one
element
insufficient
sustain
even
believed
trial
jury
need
burdened
testimony
supporting
elements
defense
cases
present
good
example
potential
wasting
valuable
trial
resources
general
trials
violations
simple
affairs
key
elements
capable
objective
demonstration
mens
rea
discussed
usually
depend
upon
reasonable
inferences
objective
facts
however
jury
trial
bailey
cooley
walker
heard
five
days
testimony
presented
evidence
every
unpleasant
aspect
prison
life
amount
garbage
cellblock
floor
meal
schedule
number
times
inmates
allowed
shower
unfortunately
evidence
presented
case
defense
reach
hopelessly
exceeded
grasp
hold
respondents
suggest
jury
subjected
potpourri
even
though
critical
element
proffered
defenses
concededly
absent
undoubtedly
convert
every
trial
hearing
current
state
federal
penal
system
juries
properly
instructed
mens
rea
required
respondents
failed
introduce
evidence
sufficient
submit
defenses
duress
necessity
juries
reverse
judgments
appeals
reversed
footnotes
whoever
escapes
attempts
escape
custody
attorney
general
authorized
representative
institution
facility
confined
direction
attorney
general
custody
virtue
process
issued
laws
judge
magistrate
custody
officer
employee
pursuant
lawful
arrest
shall
custody
confinement
virtue
arrest
charge
felony
conviction
offense
fined
imprisoned
five
years
custody
confinement
extradition
virtue
arrest
charge
misdemeanor
prior
conviction
fined
imprisoned
one
year
rebuttal
prosecution
called
joel
dean
fbi
agent
assigned
investigate
walker
escape
august
testified
standard
bureau
practice
notified
contact
made
walker
fbi
according
dean
never
informed
contact
app
respondents
asked
district
give
following
instruction
coercion
excuse
commission
criminal
act
must
result
threathening
sic
conduct
sufficient
create
mind
reasonable
person
fear
death
serious
bodily
harm
conduct
fact
caused
fear
death
serious
bodily
harm
mind
defendant
fear
duress
operating
upon
mind
defendant
time
alleged
act
defendant
committed
act
avoid
threatened
sic
harm
hierarchy
attempt
cover
offenses
criminal
liability
imposed
absence
mens
rea
whatsoever
strict
liability
crimes
exceptions
general
rule
criminal
liability
requires
mind
compare
morissette
dotterweich
model
penal
code
offenses
based
strict
liability
violations
actions
punishable
fine
forfeiture
civil
penalty
rather
imprisonment
see
model
penal
code
see
also
lafave
scott
quoting
omission
mean
course
defines
strict
liability
crime
punishment
imposed
without
proof
mens
rea
held
morissette
supra
mere
omission
statute
mention
intent
construed
eliminating
element
crimes
denounced
see
also
gypsum
model
penal
code
defendant
guilty
escape
acts
even
recklessly
toward
material
elements
offense
since
provides
unless
otherwise
provided
definition
offense
element
offense
established
person
acts
purposely
knowingly
recklessly
respect
thereto
proposed
revision
federal
criminal
code
imposed
liability
escapee
reckless
fact
subject
official
detention
aware
may
official
detention
disregards
risk
fact
official
detention
knowingly
leaves
detention
area
breaks
custody
noted
earlier
decide
whether
circumstances
escapee
held
liable
acted
recklessly
respect
material
elements
offense
see
supra
see
also
recreation
center
aetna
casualty
surety
person
acting
threat
death
relatives
denied
defense
duress
committed
crime
even
though
opportunity
contact
police
people
richards
cal
app
cal
rptr
prisoner
must
resort
administrative
judicial
channels
remedy
coercive
prison
conditions
model
penal
code
actor
must
succumb
force
threat
person
reasonable
firmness
situation
unable
resist
actor
must
believe
commission
crime
necessary
avoid
greater
harm
working
papers
duress
excuses
criminal
conduct
given
circumstances
reasonable
men
must
concede
able
act
otherwise
appreciate
fact
neither
prosecution
defense
criminal
case
may
put
evidence
simultaneously
extent
applicable
rules
case
law
otherwise
preclude
approach
district
bound
find
situations
admits
evidence
provisionally
subject
evidence
later
tied
followed
evidence
makes
evidence
conditionally
admitted
unconditionally
admissible
civil
action
question
whether
particular
affirmative
defense
sufficiently
supported
testimony
go
jury
may
often
resolved
motion
summary
judgment
course
motions
summary
judgment
creatures
civil
criminal
trials
thus
say
order
theory
duress
necessity
defense
submitted
jury
escapee
must
first
offer
evidence
justifying
continuing
absence
custody
mean
impose
rigid
mechanical
formula
attorneys
district
courts
order
evidence
supporting
particular
elements
defense
must
offered
convenience
jurors
witnesses
may
best
served
receiving
testimony
order
certain
circumstances
subject
avowal
counsel
testimony
later
tied
testimony
supporting
necessary
elements
particular
affirmative
defense
holding
substantive
one
essential
element
defense
duress
necessity
evidence
sufficient
support
finding
bona
fide
effort
surrender
return
custody
soon
claimed
duress
necessity
lost
coercive
force
general
practice
trial
courts
find
saves
considerable
time
require
testimony
element
affirmative
defense
duress
necessity
first
simply
testimony
heard
fairly
short
time
whereas
testimony
going
necessary
elements
duress
necessity
may
take
considerably
longer
present
example
jury
heard
five
days
testimony
prison
conditions
fact
trial
concluded
correctly
testimony
another
essential
element
defense
even
reach
minimum
threshold
jury
believed
element
defense
said
made
trial
judges
presiding
indictments
based
far
better
position
know
whether
matter
order
presenting
witnesses
evidence
testimony
particular
witness
may
allowed
order
subject
avowal
proffer
various
devices
employed
avoid
wasting
time
jury
testimony
irrelevant
time
avoiding
possible
necessity
recalling
seriously
inconveniencing
witness
title
provides
statute
limitations
shall
extend
person
fleeing
justice
escaped
prisoner
definition
fugitive
justice
statute
limitations
normally
applicable
federal
offenses
tolled
remained
large
see
howgate
app
contrary
implication
justice
blackmun
dissent
describing
rationale
necessity
defense
balancing
harms
post
construing
act
congress
drafting
statute
noted
requires
heightened
mens
rea
might
negated
defense
duress
coercion
nonetheless
recognize
congress
enacting
criminal
statutes
legislates
background
common
law
see
morissette
therefore
defense
duress
coercion
may
well
contemplated
congress
enacted
since
express
purpose
congress
enacting
section
punish
escape
penal
custody
think
duty
return
duty
described
elaborately
text
must
essential
element
defense
unless
congressional
judgment
escape
prison
crime
rendered
wholly
nugatory
principal
difference
dissent
therefore
existence
defense
importance
surrender
element
remain
satisfied
even
credited
jury
testimony
set
forth
length
justice
blackmun
dissenting
opinion
support
finding
respondents
alternatives
remain
large
recaptured
anywhere
one
three
months
escape
hold
otherwise
indeed
quickly
reduce
overcrowding
prisons
universally
condemned
penologists
result
accomplished
manner
quite
odds
purpose
congress
made
escape
prison
federal
criminal
offense
justice
stevens
concurring
essential
difference
majority
dissent
question
whether
record
contains
enough
evidence
bona
fide
effort
surrender
return
custody
present
question
fact
jury
resolve
issue
agree
evidence
introduced
defendants
cooley
bailey
cogdell
plainly
insufficient
vague
references
anonymous
intermediaries
inherently
incredible
trial
judge
entitled
ignore
respect
walker
however
question
much
closer
testified
personally
telephoned
fbi
agent
three
times
effort
negotiate
surrender
since
remained
large
two
months
last
effort
speak
fbi
persuaded
even
version
facts
make
adequate
attempt
satisfy
return
requirement
fact
joined
opinion
indicate
indeed
member
majority
unconcerned
prison
conditions
described
justice
blackmun
construing
federal
escape
statute
however
think
fair
note
conditions
apt
prevail
state
county
facilities
federal
facilities
moreover
reasonable
men
may
well
differ
effective
methods
redressing
situation
view
progress
toward
acceptable
solutions
involves
formulating
enforceable
objective
standards
civilized
prison
conditions
keeping
channels
communication
prisoners
outside
world
open
guaranteeing
access
courts
rather
relying
ad
hoc
judgments
good
faith
prison
administrators
giving
undue
deference
expertise
encouraging
convicted
felons
short
neither
agreement
much
justice
blackmun
written
disagreement
related
issues
prevents
joining
construction
federal
escape
statute
rebuttal
testimony
described
ante
indicates
walker
probably
telling
truth
deciding
whether
walker
testimony
sufficient
assume
veracity
compare
example
hutto
finney
bell
wolfish
see
estelle
gamble
stevens
dissenting
see
houchins
kqed
stevens
dissenting
jones
north
carolina
prisoners
union
stevens
dissenting
part
morales
schmidt
stevens
dissenting
modified
en
banc
stevens
concurring
see
harris
pate
cf
meachum
fano
stevens
dissenting
see
procunier
navarette
stevens
dissenting
see
bell
wolfish
supra
stevens
dissenting
unwise
perhaps
counterproductive
immunize
escapes
otherwise
unlawful
hope
motivate
significant
reforms
unselfish
motive
affords
assurance
crime
produce
results
perpetrator
intends
cullen
minimizing
risk
escape
course
classic
justification
imposing
rigid
discipline
within
prison
walls
justice
blackmun
justice
brennan
joins
dissenting
opinion
seems
impeccable
exercise
undisputed
general
principles
technical
legalism
respondents
properly
confined
district
columbia
jail
departed
jail
without
authority
consent
failed
promptly
turn
assert
way
justification
ante
claimed
duress
necessity
lost
coercive
force
therefore
concludes
defense
jury
weigh
consider
respondents
prosecution
escape
violative
assertion
claimed
duress
necessity
lost
coercive
force
particularly
disagree
conditions
led
respondents
initial
departure
jail
continue
unabated
departure
justified
record
us
issue
feel
jury
resolve
matter
fact
light
evidence
determine
matter
law
seems
much
demand
respondents
order
preserve
legal
defenses
return
forthwith
hell
obviously
exceeds
normal
deprivations
prison
life
compelled
leaving
first
instance
however
requires
escapee
action
must
amount
nothing
mere
temporary
gesture
hoped
might
attract
attention
responsive
circles
life
health
even
convicts
accuseds
deserve
better
entitled
pious
pronouncements
fit
ideal
world
carefully
structured
opinion
reach
result
might
proper
one
living
ideal
world
american
jails
penitentiaries
truly
places
humane
rehabilitative
treatment
inmates
statutory
crime
escape
excused
duress
necessity
beatings
fires
jails
take
place
escapees
appropriately
prosecuted
punished
live
ideal
world
even
use
phrase
america
far
jail
prison
conditions
concerned
complaints
every
american
appellate
receives
almost
daily
prisoners
conditions
incarceration
filth
homosexual
rape
brutality
always
mouthings
purely
malcontent
acknowledges
ante
conditions
respondents
complained
exist
light
stark
truth
seems
cases
evaluated
must
follow
evidence
proffered
respondent
cogdell
admitted
jury
respondents
bailey
cooley
walker
tried
instructed
disregard
evidence
come
therefore
dissent
atrocities
inhuman
conditions
prison
life
america
almost
unbelievable
surely
nothing
less
shocking
dissent
bailey
case
appeals
acknowledged
circumstances
prison
life
least
colorable
credible
claim
duress
necessity
raised
respect
virtually
every
escape
app
government
concedes
light
prison
conditions
even
prevail
rare
inmate
convince
continued
incarceration
harmful
health
safety
brief
see
furtado
bishop
cert
denied
post
cf
bell
wolfish
youthful
inmate
expect
subjected
homosexual
gang
rape
first
night
jail
said
even
van
way
jail
weaker
inmates
become
property
stronger
prisoners
gangs
sell
sexual
services
victim
prison
officials
either
disinterested
stopping
abuse
prisoners
prisoners
incapable
given
limited
resources
society
allocates
prison
system
prison
officials
often
merely
indifferent
serious
health
safety
needs
prisoners
well
even
appalling
fact
guards
frequently
participate
brutalization
inmates
classic
example
beating
punishment
retaliation
prisoner
complaints
actions
evidence
submitted
respondents
cases
fits
pattern
exactly
respondent
bailey
presented
evidence
continually
mistreated
correctional
officers
stay
jail
threatened
testimony
brad
king
case
bring
severe
retribution
app
inmates
beaten
guards
message
bailey
inmate
testified
one
occasion
three
guards
displaying
small
knife
told
going
get
buddy
nigger
bailey
going
kill
threats
culminated
series
violent
attacks
bailey
blackjacks
mace
slapjacks
leather
steel
insert
used
beating
bailey
respondent
cooley
also
elicited
testimony
inmates
concerning
beatings
cooley
guards
slapjacks
blackjacks
flashlights
evidence
guards
threatened
kill
cooley
society
responsibility
protect
life
health
prisoners
hen
sheriff
marshall
sic
takes
man
courthouse
prison
van
transports
confinement
two
three
ten
years
act
tolled
bell
whether
like
made
collective
responsibility
free
something
emphasis
original
address
chief
justice
record
assn
bar
city
new
york
mar
deliberate
indifference
serious
essential
medical
needs
prisoners
constitutes
cruel
unusual
punishment
violative
eighth
amendment
estelle
gamble
inmate
must
rely
prison
authorities
treat
medical
needs
worst
cases
failure
may
actually
produce
physical
torture
lingering
death
less
serious
cases
denial
medical
care
may
result
pain
suffering
one
suggests
serve
penological
purpose
infliction
unnecessary
suffering
inconsistent
contemporary
standards
decency
little
question
prisons
badly
understaffed
large
part
cause
many
shortcomings
penal
systems
however
excuse
failure
provide
place
confinement
meets
minimal
standards
safety
decency
penal
systems
parts
world
demonstrate
vast
improvement
surely
beyond
reach
contrast
indifference
programs
countries
europe
holland
scandinavian
countries
particular
happy
one
us
address
chief
justice
supra
many
years
since
swedish
prisoners
concerned
problems
adequate
food
water
shelter
true
religious
freedom
adequate
medical
treatment
ward
inmate
rights
prison
reform
sweden
denmark
crim
see
also
corrections
magazine
june
sweden
prisons
inmates
private
cell
salomon
lessons
swedish
criminal
justice
system
reappraisal
fed
probation
prisons
small
largest
accommodate
inmates
house
supra
appears
relaxed
atmosphere
staff
inmates
prevailing
attitude
prisoners
must
treated
dignity
respect
siegel
criminal
justice
swedish
style
humane
search
answers
offender
rehabilitation
ii
real
question
presented
case
whether
prisoner
punished
helping
extricate
situation
society
abdicated
completely
basic
responsibility
providing
environment
free
conditions
beatings
fires
lack
essential
medical
care
sexual
attacks
sure
congress
many
words
enacted
specific
statutory
duress
necessity
defenses
excuse
justify
commission
otherwise
unlawful
act
concept
defense
however
anciently
woven
fabric
culture
hall
general
principles
criminal
law
ed
quoted
brief
government
concedes
always
accepted
part
criminal
justice
system
punishment
inappropriate
crimes
committed
duress
defendant
circumstances
fairly
blamed
wrongful
act
although
declines
address
issue
least
implies
recognize
defenses
duress
necessity
federal
crime
prison
escape
appropriate
prerequisites
assertion
either
defense
met
see
ante
given
universal
acceptance
defenses
common
law
difficulty
concluding
congress
intended
defenses
duress
necessity
available
persons
accused
committing
federal
crime
escape
agree
comments
essential
elements
defenses
conclude
intolerable
prison
conditions
taken
account
affirmative
defenses
duress
necessity
rather
way
theory
intent
espoused
appeals
conclusion
intent
avoid
normal
aspects
confinement
essential
element
offense
escape
means
burden
proof
government
prove
element
according
precedents
mullaney
wilbur
government
prove
intent
beyond
reasonable
doubt
unlikely
congress
intended
place
difficult
burden
prosecution
legislative
history
sparse
specifically
define
requisite
intent
circumstances
compel
coerce
person
commit
offense
however
traditionally
treated
affirmative
defense
burden
proof
defendant
although
intolerable
prison
conditions
fit
within
standard
definition
duress
necessity
defense
see
app
analogous
traditional
defenses
therefore
agree
appropriate
treat
unduly
harsh
prison
conditions
affirmative
defense
also
agree
absence
reasonable
less
drastic
alternatives
prerequisite
successful
assertion
defense
necessity
duress
charge
prison
escape
one
must
appreciate
however
realistic
avenues
redress
seldom
open
prisoner
prison
officials
participate
maltreatment
inmate
purposefully
ignore
dangerous
conditions
brutalities
inflicted
prisoners
guards
inmate
little
protect
filing
complaint
may
well
result
retribution
appealing
guards
capital
offense
prisoners
code
behavior
instances
question
whether
alternative
remedies
thoroughly
exhausted
matter
jury
decide
conclude
jury
generally
instructed
order
prevail
necessity
duress
defense
defendant
must
justify
continued
absence
custody
well
initial
departure
agree
nature
escape
makes
continuing
crime
agree
way
continued
absence
justified
evidence
bona
fide
effort
surrender
return
custody
ante
apparently
entertains
view
naive
estimation
prisoner
escaped
situation
turn
secure
faith
escape
somehow
result
improvement
intolerable
prison
conditions
may
true
rare
circumstance
escapee
obtain
aid
prison
administration
escape
accomplished
escapee
realistically
faces
high
probability
returned
prison
exactly
even
greater
threats
life
safety
rationale
necessity
defense
balancing
harms
harm
caused
escape
less
harm
caused
remaining
threatening
situation
prisoner
initial
departure
justified
rationale
apply
hesitancy
failure
return
situation
may
well
arise
social
balance
weighs
favor
prisoner
even
though
fails
return
custody
escapee
least
permitted
present
jury
possibility
harm
result
return
custody
outweighs
harm
society
continued
absence
even
standard
defendant
escape
prosecution
permitted
submit
evidence
jury
demonstrate
surrender
result
placed
situation
requires
return
custody
claimed
duress
necessity
lost
coercive
force
ante
realistically
however
escapee
reasonably
believes
surrender
result
return
concededly
intolerable
prison
situation
remains
subject
coercive
force
prompted
escape
first
instance
ironic
say
force
automatically
lost
prison
wall
passed
phrasing
test
demonstrates
deciding
factual
questions
presented
jury
bona
fide
effort
surrender
must
proved
ibid
whether
effort
bona
fide
jury
question
also
ague
necessarily
statements
defendants
witnesses
future
good
intentions
ambiguous
conduct
simply
support
finding
element
defense
ante
traditionally
function
jury
evaluate
credibility
meaning
necessarily
statements
ambiguous
conduct
see
people
luther
people
unger
esquibel
state
finally
course
must
agree
use
jury
reserved
case
sufficient
evidence
support
verdict
difficulty
however
concluding
respondents
indeed
submit
sufficient
evidence
support
verdict
guilty
jury
inclined
based
necessity
defense
respondent
bailey
testified
fear
life
afraid
still
face
threats
turned
fbi
telling
people
going
shoot
app
respondent
cooley
testified
know
anyone
call
feared
police
shoot
came
get
respondent
walker
testified
constant
rapport
fbi
agent
assured
fbi
harm
promise
returned
jail
walker
also
stated
heard
sister
fbi
said
ran
going
kill
perhaps
highly
unlikely
jury
believed
respondents
stories
fbi
planned
shoot
sight
respondent
walker
constant
communication
fbi
agent
nevertheless
testimony
even
though
possibly
extreme
unwarranted
part
sufficient
permit
jury
decide
whether
failure
surrender
immediately
justified
excused
routine
grist
jury
mill
jury
usually
able
sort
fabricated
incredible
conclusion
major
point
disagreement
whether
defendant
may
get
duress
necessity
defense
jury
supported
testimony
ambiguous
conduct
difficult
imagine
case
criminal
civil
jury
asked
decide
factual
question
based
completely
disinterested
testimony
unambiguous
actions
essence
jury
issue
dispute
credibility
testimony
interested
witnesses
meaning
ambiguous
actions
ruling
defense
matter
law
preventing
jury
considering
rare
occurrence
criminal
cases
criminal
case
law
assigns
factfinding
function
solely
jury
sandstrom
montana
jury
conscience
society
role
criminal
prosecution
particularly
important
duncan
louisiana
yet
appears
place
especially
strict
burden
proof
defendants
attempting
establish
affirmative
defense
charged
crime
escape
action
unwarranted
respondents
allegations
true
society
grossly
fault
permitting
conditions
persist
jail
findings
researchers
government
agencies
well
litigated
cases
indicate
general
sense
allegations
credible
case
recognizing
duress
necessity
defenses
even
compelling
society
rather
private
actors
creates
coercive
conditions
situation
especially
appropriate
jury
permitted
weigh
factors
strike
balance
interests
prisoners
society
attempt
conserve
jury
cases
considers
truly
worthy
body
ousted
jury
role
particularly
well
suited
serve
see
silberman
criminal
violence
criminal
justice
report
sexual
assaults
prison
system
sheriff
vans
radzinowicz
wolfgang
crime
justice
ed
see
generally
silberman
supra
bartollas
miller
dinitz
juvenile
victimization
institutional
paradox
weiss
friar
terror
prisons
ballesteros
behind
jail
bars
luttrell
behind
prison
walls
weiss
friar
supra
youth
epileptic
seizure
sprayed
tear
gas
resulting
severe
trauma
mueller
medical
services
prison
lessons
two
surveys
ciba
foundation
symposium
medical
care
prisoners
detainees
mitford
kind
usual
punishment
univ
law
school
health
care
conditions
pennsylvania
state
prisons
reprinted
aba
correctional
facilities
services
standards
materials
medical
health
care
jails
prisons
correctional
facilities
report
medical
advisory
committee
state
prisons
correction
human
services
commonwealth
mass
reprinted
aba
standards
materials
see
weiss
friar
supra
see
note
escape
cruel
unusual
punishment
theory
constitutional
necessity
rev
landman
royster
supp
ed
sostre
rockefeller
supp
sdny
rev
part
modified
part
aff
part
sub
nom
sostre
mcginnis
en
banc
cert
denied
sub
nom
sostre
oswald
mitford
supra
see
goldfarb
jails
ultimate
ghetto
official
oklahoma
crime
commission
describes
gang
rape
concludes
kid
tells
guards
life
worth
nickel
state
green
mo
dissenting
opinion
cert
denied
alleged
facts
case
appear
typical
respondent
bailey
filed
suit
superior
district
columbia
stop
administrators
threatening
life
app
bailey
testified
suit
caused
guards
threaten
attempt
persuade
withdraw
action
beat
transfer
mental
ward
bailey
suit
subsequently
dismissed
prejudice
brief
respondents
surrender
fear
life
know
turned
still
threats
death
always
knew
fbi
wanted
kill
escaped
limbo
know
people
call
officials
jail
several
occasions
let
ask
question
stated
never
surrendered
still
fearful
threats
right
understand
returned
yes
sir
new
detention
center
street
southeast
section
northeast
know
guards
officers
left
ever
hear
fbi
looking
yes
feel
tell
fbi
want
return
jail
northeast
fbi
telling
people
going
shoot
app
left
jail
cooley
make
attempt
notify
anybody
authority
say
make
attempt
notify
anybody
yeah
like
ai
per
se
like
went
home
know
people
called
told
told
happened
done
mad
told
done
understood
called
never
got
touch
anybody
ever
make
attempt
call
anybody
know
nobody
call
thinking
like
like
jail
ai
nobody
call
call
anybody
jail
feel
purpose
none
probably
came
got
make
try
run
shoot
half
come
get
feared
life
call
reason
right
ever
leave
washington
left
jail
defendant
walker
one
issue
want
briefly
touch
fact
released
detention
facility
fact
contact
proper
authorities
contacted
fbi
number
occasions
matter
fact
kept
constant
rapport
fbi
people
told
brought
information
sisters
fbi
said
ran
going
kill
actuality
never
immediate
danger
never
immediate
threat
losing
life
given
fbi
threat
contend
also
go
back
jail
left
reason
consequently
never
turned
authorities
testimony
walker
know
names
individuals
fbi
retained
constant
rapport
course
escape
one
officer
troy
fauntroy
something
nature
know
exact
name
call
sir
called
second
day
occasion
call
several
different
occasions
identify
times
yes
identified
indicate
indicate
tell
going
surrender
told
surrender
subjected
conditions
put
penitentiary
left
many
days
call
gentleman
know
called
two
three
different
times
period
streets
december
correct
think
date
sir
make
phone
call
fbi
made
first
one
public
phone
booth
know
number
call
sir
look
directory
looked
directory
ask
anybody
particular
fbi
asked
speak
someone
warrant
squad
someone
connected
escapees
name
fluharty
ring
bell
name
fluharty
ring
bell
name
gentleman
may
spoken
spoke
someone
sounds
halfway
familiar
exactly
tell
sir
explained
one
four
gentlemen
escaped
detention
facility
august
conditions
existed
explained
terminal
conditions
asked
kind
way
get
make
type
arrangements
far
turning
go
back
detention
facility
street
southeast
also
asked
anything
issued
concerning
told
man
named
earl
berman
whether
fbi
knowledge
anybody
fbi
told
earl
berman
intended
kill
arrested
earl
berman
sir
earl
berman
personal
friend
mine
saying
berman
told
fbi
going
kill
yes
tell
told
sister
sister
related
information
heard
yes
heard
schaars
sir
exactly
first
time
called
agent
fluharty
someone
name
fauntroy
fbi
second
day
sir
recall
time
day
sir
know
early
morning
hours
say
sir
know
long
conversation
lasted
point
longer
duration
identify
identify
second
time
spoke
somebody
fbi
approximately
week
half
later
fair
say
ten
days
later
sir
think
fair
speak
time
person
ask
time
sir
yes
called
fbi
building
previous
told
going
call
recall
time
day
called
time
sir
afternoon
long
conversation
take
time
duration
identify
sir
yes
identified
time
indicate
agent
fluharty
going
turn
indicated
work
conditions
wanted
turn
turn
conditions
conditions
fact
harmed
agent
fbi
taken
back
detention
facility
street
southeast
come
time
spoke
somebody
fbi
yes
sir
say
month
later
sir
late
october
sorry
mean
confuse
october
know
whether
late
around
october
around
middle
first
part
october
speak
time
sir
guy
agent
fluharty
assume
name
somebody
warrant
escape
squad
speaking
time
sir
assume
ask
specifically
somebody
squad
first
time
called
first
time
called
second
time
ask
agent
name
yes
third
time
ask
agent
name
yes
sir
third
occasion
offer
come
turn
certain
specified
conditions
conditions
indicated
two
prior
occasions
conditions
sir
come
time
called
fbi
recollection
beginning
middle
october
whenever
third
phone
call
occurred
december
contact
fbi
recollection
call
law
enforcement
agency
period
time
sir
ever
appear
district
columbia
turn
period
time
ever
talk
minister
priest
kind
religious
leader
effort
turn
period
time
yes
minister
sir
speak
another
member
faith
minister
yes
speak
sir
want
give
name
time
want
incriminate
far
anything
far
escape
everything
concerned
charge
tell
gentleman
going
turn
told
discussed
turning
member
fbi
thought
seriously
conditions
specified
worked
spoke
gentleman
fbi
ever
indicate
agree
conditions
indicate
agree
anything
indicated
agree
harmed
members
federal
bureau
investigation
agree
taken
back
detention
facility
street
promise
fbi
going
hurt
yes
told
fbi
hurt
contact
warrant
squad
officer
district
columbia
department
corrections
period
elopment
sic
recollection
unless
part
warrant
squad
app
addition
sources
cited
see
american
assembly
prisoners
america
sheehan
prison
prisoner
williams
fish
convicts
codes
contraband
inside
prison
american
style
minton
ed
murton
dilemma
prison
reform
american
friends
service
committee
struggle
justice
report
crime
punishment
america
behind
bars
prisoners
america
kwartler
ed
bagdikian
dash
shame
prisons
note
rev
note
intolerable
conditions
defense
prison
escapes
ucla
rev
comment
rev
note
rev
comment
buffalo
rev
plotkin
surviving
justice
prisoners
rights
free
physical
assault
cleve
rev
note
cal
rev
note
albany
rev