anders
state
argued
march
decided
may
rehearing
denied
june
see
ira
michael
heyman
petitioner
george
roth
los
angeles
respondent
justice
clark
delivered
opinion
concerned
extent
duty
appointed
appellate
counsel
prosecute
first
appeal
criminal
conviction
attorney
conscientiously
determined
merit
indigent
appeal
convicted
felony
possession
marijuana
petitioner
sought
appeal
moved
california
district
appeal
appoint
counsel
motion
granted
however
study
record
consultation
petitioner
appointed
counsel
concluded
merit
appeal
advised
letter
time
informed
petitioner
wished
file
brief
behalf
juncture
petitioner
requested
appointment
another
attorney
request
denied
petitioner
proceeded
file
brief
pro
se
state
responded
petitioner
filed
reply
brief
january
district
appeal
unanimously
affirmed
conviction
people
anders
january
petitioner
filed
application
writ
habeas
corpus
district
appeal
sought
case
reopened
application
raised
issue
deprivation
right
counsel
original
appeal
refusal
appoint
counsel
appellate
stage
proceedings
denied
application
day
brief
unreported
memorandum
opinion
stated
reviewed
record
determined
appeal
without
merit
also
stated
procedure
prescribed
nash
followed
case
june
petitioner
submitted
petition
writ
habeas
corpus
california
petition
denied
without
opinion
july
among
trial
errors
petitioner
claimed
judge
prosecutor
commented
failure
testify
contrary
holding
griffin
state
california
concluded
california
action
comport
fair
procedure
lacks
equality
required
fourteenth
amendment
decade
continuing
line
cases
reached
concerning
discrimination
indigent
dfe
ndant
first
appeal
beginning
griffin
people
state
illinois
held
equal
justice
afforded
indigent
appellant
nature
review
amount
money
continuing
douglas
people
state
california
consistently
held
invalid
procedures
rich
man
appeals
right
enjoys
benefit
counsel
examination
record
research
law
marshalling
arguments
behalf
indigent
already
burdened
preliminary
determination
case
without
merit
forced
shift
indeed
federal
courts
advice
counsel
long
required
whenever
defendant
challenges
certification
appeal
taken
good
faith
johnson
representation
must
role
advocate
ellis
rather
amicus
curiae
ellis
supra
concluded
counsel
convinced
conscientious
investigation
appeal
frivolous
course
may
ask
withdraw
account
satisfied
counsel
diligently
investigated
possible
grounds
appeal
agrees
counsel
evaluation
case
leave
withdraw
may
allowed
leave
appeal
may
denied
gideon
wainwright
sixth
amendment
requirement
accused
shall
enjoy
right
assistance
counsel
defence
made
obligatory
fourteenth
amendment
holding
adversary
system
criminal
justice
person
haled
poor
hire
lawyer
assured
fair
trial
unless
counsel
provided
continue
adhere
principles
ii
petitioner
case
appointed
counsel
wrote
district
appeal
stating
file
brief
appeal
opinion
merit
appeal
visited
communicated
anders
explained
may
views
opinions
wishes
file
brief
matter
behalf
district
appeal
examined
record
affirmed
conviction
believe
counsel
bare
conclusion
evidenced
letter
enough
smacks
treatment
eskridge
received
condemned
permitted
trial
judge
withhold
transcript
found
defendant
accorded
fair
impartial
trial
opinion
grave
prejudicial
errors
occurred
therein
eskridge
washington
state
board
procedure
said
adequate
substitute
right
full
appellate
review
available
defendants
may
able
afford
expense
still
another
case
state
officer
outside
judicial
system
given
power
deprive
indigent
appeal
refusing
order
transcript
merely
thought
unsuccessful
reversed
finding
procedure
meet
constitutional
standards
lane
brown
counsel
transcript
refused
proceed
appeal
found
merit
filed
letter
district
appeal
whereupon
examined
record
affirmed
judgment
petition
writ
habeas
corpus
six
years
later
found
appeal
nome
rit
failed
however
say
whether
frivolous
consideration
simply
found
petition
merit
dismissing
habeas
corpus
application
gave
reason
decision
know
basis
action
say
finding
frivolity
either
california
courts
counsel
acted
greater
capacity
merely
amicus
curiae
condemned
ellis
supra
hence
california
procedure
furnish
petitioner
counsel
acting
role
advocate
provide
full
consideration
resolution
matter
obtained
counsel
acting
capacity
necessity
counsel
acting
highlighted
possible
disadvantage
petitioner
suffered
pro
se
brief
filed
urged
several
trial
errors
failed
raise
point
judge
prosecutor
commented
jury
regarding
petitioner
failure
testify
griffin
state
california
supra
outlawed
california
comment
rule
embodied
art
california
constitution
iii
constitutional
requirement
substantial
equality
fair
process
attained
counsel
acts
role
active
advocate
behalf
client
opposed
amicus
curiae
letter
procedure
triggers
reach
dignity
counsel
honor
without
conflict
assistance
client
role
advocate
requires
support
client
appeal
best
ability
course
counsel
finds
case
wholly
frivolous
conscientious
examination
advise
request
permission
withdraw
request
must
however
accompanied
brief
referring
anything
record
might
arguably
support
appeal
copy
counsel
brief
furnished
indigent
time
allowed
raise
points
chooses
proceeds
full
examination
proceedings
decide
whether
case
wholly
frivolous
finds
may
grant
counsel
request
withdraw
dismiss
appeal
insofar
federal
requirements
concerned
proceed
decision
merits
state
law
requires
hand
finds
legal
points
arguable
merits
therefore
frivolous
must
prior
decision
afford
indigent
assistance
counsel
argue
appeal
requirement
force
appointed
counsel
brief
case
client
merely
afford
latter
advocacy
nonindigent
defendant
able
obtain
also
induce
pursue
vigorously
review
ready
references
record
also
legal
authorities
furnished
counsel
letter
hand
affords
neither
client
aid
former
must
shift
entirely
cold
record
must
review
without
help
advocate
moreover
handling
tend
protect
counsel
constantly
increasing
charge
ineffective
handled
case
diligence
indigent
defendant
entitled
procedure
assure
penniless
defendants
rightsan
opportunities
nearly
enjoyed
persons
similar
situation
able
afford
retention
private
counsel
judgment
reversed
case
remanded
proceedings
inconsistent
opinion
ordered
judgment
reversed
case
remanded
may
justice
stewart
justice
black
justice
harlan
join
dissenting
system
used
california
handling
indigent
appeals
described
california
nash
believe
requirement
douglas
case
met
case
counsel
appointed
represent
defendant
appeal
thoroughly
studies
record
consults
defendant
trial
counsel
conscientiously
concludes
meritorious
grounds
appeal
thereafter
appellate
satisfied
review
record
light
points
raised
defendant
personally
counsel
assessment
record
correct
need
appoint
another
counsel
represent
defendant
appeal
may
properly
decide
appeal
without
oral
argument
emphasis
added
today
holds
procedure
unconstitutional
imposes
upon
appointed
counsel
wishes
withdraw
case
deems
frivolous
requirement
filing
brief
referring
anything
record
might
arguably
support
appeal
record
present
issues
appeal
frivolous
counsel
filed
letter
first
place
quixotic
requirement
imposed
explained
think
upon
cynical
assumption
appointed
lawyer
professional
representation
appellate
letter
trusted
assumption
subscribe
believe
lawyers
appointed
represent
indigents
likely
lacking
diligence
competence
professional
honesty
certainly
suggestion
present
case
petitioner
counsel
either
incompetent
unethical
even
join
degrading
appraisal
forma
pauperis
bar
escapes
procedure
commands
constitutionally
superior
system
followed
california
fundamental
error
opinion
seems
implicit
assertion
single
inflexible
answer
difficult
problem
accord
equal
protection
indigent
appellants
believing
procedure
anders
appeal
considere
free
constitutional
error
affirm
judgment
footnotes
previously
january
petitioner
parole
arrested
convicted
felony
burglary
affirmed
appeal
granted
certiorari
vacated
judgment
remanded
consideration
light
chapman
california
nash
held
requirements
douglas
people
state
california
met
event
appointed
counsel
thoroughly
studies
record
consults
defendant
trial
counsel
conscientiously
concludes
advises
appellate
meritorious
grounds
appeal
provided
appellate
satisfied
review
record
light
points
personally
raised
defendant
appointed
counsel
conclusion
correct
appeal
proceeds
without
appointment
counsel
decision
reached
without
argument
comparative
purposes
see
tate
johnson
outline
practice
followed
district
columbia
guidelines
elaborated
detail
handed
clerk
appointed
counsel
prepared
appeals
district
columbia
circuit
indicate
approval
requirements
set
statement
cases
concedes
much
brief
filed
counsel
believes
case
frivolous
goes
hold
california
appellate
finds
legal
points
arguable
merits
therefore
frivolous
must
afford
indigent
assistance
counsel
ante
emphasis
added
even
accepting
requirement
one
perceive
issue
anders
case
order
remand
new
appeal
courts
lawyers
examined
case
turned
claim
prosecutor
commented
silence
trial
anders
conviction
affirmed
california
district
appeal
six
years
griffin
state
california
decided
later
decision
tehan
ex
rel
shott
based
premise
prior
griffin
practice
commenting
defendant
silence
well
established
thus
raise
issue
cf
ohio