alessi
argued
march
decided
may
two
suits
initiated
new
jersey
state
retired
employees
received
workers
compensation
awards
subsequent
retirement
challenged
validity
provisions
employers
pension
plans
reducing
retiree
pension
benefits
amount
equal
workers
compensation
award
retiree
eligible
private
pension
plans
subject
federal
regulation
employee
retirement
income
security
act
erisa
employers
independently
removed
suits
federal
district
judges
suit
held
pension
offset
provisions
invalid
provision
new
jersey
workers
compensation
act
prohibiting
offsets
congress
intended
erisa
state
laws
offsets
prohibited
erisa
provision
prohibiting
forfeitures
pension
rights
except
specified
conditions
inapplicable
cases
treasury
regulation
authorizing
offsets
based
workers
compensation
awards
invalid
appeals
consolidated
appeals
two
decisions
reversed
held
congress
contemplated
approved
kind
pension
provisions
challenged
pp
pension
plan
provisions
offsets
based
workers
compensation
awards
contravene
erisa
nonforfeiture
provisions
prohibits
forfeitures
vested
rights
specified
exceptions
include
workers
compensation
offsets
nevertheless
provisions
make
clear
erisa
leaves
private
parties
creating
pension
plan
determination
content
amount
benefits
vested
forfeited
statutory
definition
nonforfeitable
pension
benefits
assures
employee
claim
protected
benefit
legally
enforceable
guarantee
particular
amount
method
calculating
benefit
cf
nachman
pension
benefit
guaranty
particularly
pertinent
congress
prohibit
integration
calculation
practice
benefit
levels
determined
combining
pension
funds
public
income
streams
available
retired
employee
rather
congress
accepted
practice
expressly
preserving
option
pension
fund
integration
benefits
available
social
security
act
railroad
retirement
act
offsets
pension
benefits
workers
compensation
awards
work
much
like
integration
pension
benefits
social
security
railroad
retirement
payments
thus
nonforfeiture
provision
applicability
former
kind
integration
latter
pp
although
neither
erisa
legislative
history
mentions
integration
workers
compensation
erisa
forbid
treasury
regulation
permitting
reductions
pension
benefits
based
awards
state
workers
compensation
laws
internal
revenue
service
rulings
effect
merit
argument
integration
pension
funds
workers
compensation
awards
based
injuries
lacks
rationale
behind
erisa
permission
integration
pension
funds
social
security
railroad
retirement
payments
supply
payments
wages
lost
due
retirement
social
security
railroad
retirement
acts
also
provide
payments
disability
erisa
permits
pension
integration
benefits
well
benefits
wages
lost
due
retirement
moreover
enacted
erisa
congress
knew
irs
rulings
permitting
integration
workers
compensation
benefits
left
effect
pp
new
jersey
statute
question
federal
law
insofar
eliminates
method
calculating
pension
benefits
plans
governed
erisa
provision
erisa
stating
act
provisions
shall
supersede
state
laws
relate
covered
employee
benefit
plan
demonstrates
congress
meant
establish
pension
plan
regulation
exclusively
federal
concern
regardless
whether
purpose
new
jersey
statute
might
protect
employee
right
workers
compensation
disability
benefits
rather
regulate
pension
plans
statute
relate
pension
plans
governed
erisa
eliminates
one
method
calculating
pension
benefits
integration
permitted
federal
law
state
provision
thus
impermissible
intrusion
federal
regulatory
scheme
moment
new
jersey
intrudes
indirectly
workers
compensation
law
rather
directly
statute
called
pension
regulation
since
erisa
makes
clear
even
indirect
state
action
bearing
private
pensions
may
encroach
upon
area
exclusive
federal
concern
moreover
pension
plans
emerge
collective
bargaining
additional
federal
interest
precluding
state
interference
negotiations
calls
state
efforts
regulate
pension
terms
pp
marshall
delivered
opinion
members
joined
except
brennan
took
part
decision
cases
together
buczynski
et
al
general
motors
et
certiorari
theodore
sachs
argued
cause
appellants
briefs
michael
scarola
mark
steckloff
marc
gettis
argued
cause
filed
briefs
petitioners
warren
john
casey
argued
cause
appellees
brief
sebastian
fortunato
laurence
reich
argued
cause
respondent
brief
otis
smith
eugene
hartwig
david
davis
john
degan
attorney
general
stephen
skillman
assistant
attorney
general
michael
bokar
deputy
attorney
general
filed
brief
state
new
jersey
appellee
rule
respondent
rule
fn
briefs
amici
curiae
urging
reversal
filed
alfred
miller
american
association
retired
persons
et
al
gill
deford
neal
dudovitz
gray
panthers
leonard
zubrensky
theodore
sachs
merl
stong
et
al
briefs
amici
curiae
urging
affirmance
filed
solicitor
general
mccree
acting
assistant
attorney
general
murray
stuart
smith
william
friedlander
michael
roach
richard
wentley
patrick
ritchey
industries
stanley
kaleczyc
chamber
commerce
george
pantos
erisa
industry
committee
charles
volk
william
scott
national
steel
justice
marshall
delivered
opinion
private
pension
plans
reduce
retiree
pension
benefits
amount
workers
compensation
awards
received
subsequent
retirement
cases
consider
whether
two
offset
provisions
lawful
employee
retirement
income
security
act
erisa
stat
amended
et
seq
ed
supp
iii
whether
may
prohibited
state
law
general
motors
maintain
employee
pension
plans
subject
federal
regulation
erisa
plans
provide
employee
retirement
benefits
shall
reduced
offset
amount
equal
workers
compensation
awards
individual
eligible
new
jersey
legislature
amended
workers
compensation
act
expressly
prohibit
offsets
amendment
right
compensation
granted
chapter
may
set
disability
pension
benefits
payments
shall
set
employees
retirement
pension
benefits
payments
stat
ann
west
supp
amended
laws
ch
alleging
violations
provision
state
law
two
suits
initiated
new
jersey
state
plaintiffs
suits
retired
employees
obtained
workers
compensation
awards
subject
offsets
retirement
benefits
pension
plans
defendant
companies
independently
removed
suits
district
district
new
jersey
district
judges
ruled
pension
offset
provisions
invalid
new
jersey
law
concluded
congress
intended
erisa
state
laws
sort
district
judges
also
held
offsets
prohibited
erisa
section
prohibits
forfeitures
vested
pension
rights
except
four
specific
conditions
inapplicable
cases
judges
concluded
offsets
based
workers
compensation
awards
forbidden
forfeitures
struck
contrary
federal
treasury
regulation
authorizing
offsets
appeals
third
circuit
consolidated
appeals
two
decisions
reversed
rejected
district
judges
view
offset
provisions
caused
forfeiture
vested
pension
rights
forbidden
instead
appeals
reasoned
offsets
merely
reduce
pension
benefits
fashion
expressly
approved
erisa
employees
receiving
social
security
benefits
accordingly
appeals
found
conflict
erisa
treasury
regulation
approving
reductions
based
workers
compensation
awards
erisa
finally
concluded
new
jersey
statute
forbidding
offsets
pension
benefits
amount
workers
compensation
awards
withstand
erisa
general
provision
noted
probable
jurisdiction
appeal
taken
former
employees
granted
certiorari
petition
former
employees
general
motors
convenience
refer
former
employees
cases
retirees
affirm
judgment
appeals
ii
retirees
claim
workers
compensation
offset
provisions
pension
plans
contravene
erisa
nonforfeiture
provisions
treasury
regulation
contrary
inconsistent
act
claims
require
examination
relevant
sections
erisa
recently
observed
erisa
comprehensive
reticulated
statute
congress
adopted
careful
study
private
retirement
pension
plans
nachman
pension
benefit
guaranty
nachman
observed
congress
erisa
wanted
ensure
worker
promised
defined
pension
benefit
upon
retirement
fulfilled
whatever
conditions
required
obtain
vested
benefit
actually
receives
reason
concepts
vested
rights
nonforfeitable
rights
critical
erisa
scheme
see
erisa
prescribes
vesting
accrual
schedules
assuring
employees
obtain
rights
least
portions
normal
pension
benefits
even
leave
positions
prior
retirement
critically
erisa
establishes
ach
pension
plan
shall
provide
employee
right
normal
retirement
benefit
nonforfeitable
upon
attainment
normal
retirement
age
retirees
rely
sweeping
assurance
pension
rights
become
nonforfeitable
claiming
offsetting
benefits
workers
compensation
awards
violates
erisa
retirees
argue
first
vested
benefits
may
forfeited
except
expressly
provided
second
retirees
assert
offsets
based
workers
compensation
fall
none
express
exceptions
claims
correct
prohibits
forfeitures
vested
rights
except
expressly
provided
challenged
workers
compensation
offsets
among
permitted
section
despite
facial
accuracy
retirees
argument
overlooks
threshold
issue
defines
content
benefit
vested
forfeited
erisa
leaves
question
largely
private
parties
creating
plan
private
parties
government
control
level
benefits
clear
statutory
language
defining
nonforfeitable
rights
well
portions
erisa
erisa
defines
nonforfeitable
pension
benefit
right
claim
obtained
participant
beneficiary
part
immediate
deferred
benefit
pension
plan
arises
participant
service
unconditional
legally
enforceable
plan
construing
definition
last
term
observed
term
forfeiture
normally
connotes
total
loss
consequence
event
rather
limit
value
person
rights
examples
plan
provision
expressly
described
causing
forfeiture
listed
describes
event
death
temporary
might
otherwise
construed
causing
forfeiture
entire
benefit
therefore
surely
consistent
statutory
definition
nonforfeitable
view
describing
quality
participant
right
pension
rather
limit
amount
may
collect
nachman
pension
benefit
guaranty
rather
imposing
mandatory
pension
levels
methods
calculating
benefits
congress
erisa
set
outer
bounds
permissible
accrual
practices
specified
three
alternative
schedules
vesting
pension
rights
congress
limited
variation
permitted
accrual
rates
applicable
across
entire
period
employee
participation
pension
plan
congress
disapproved
pension
practices
unduly
delaying
employee
acquisition
right
enforce
payment
portion
benefits
already
accrued
without
employment
provisions
together
assure
minimum
legally
enforceable
claim
pension
benefits
created
covered
plan
employees
completed
years
service
employees
aged
older
completed
years
service
restrictions
erisa
permits
total
benefit
levels
formulas
determining
accrual
completion
years
service
vary
plan
plan
see
benefits
defined
merely
plan
particularly
pertinent
purposes
congress
prohibit
integration
calculation
practice
benefit
levels
determined
combining
pension
funds
income
streams
available
retired
employees
integration
income
stream
contributes
calculation
purposes
total
benefit
pool
distributed
retired
employees
even
nonpension
funds
available
subgroup
employees
pension
funds
thus
integrated
funds
income
maintenance
programs
social
security
pension
benefit
level
determined
basis
entire
pool
funds
practice
individual
employee
eligibility
social
security
advantage
participants
private
pension
plan
addition
anticipated
social
security
payments
total
benefit
pool
permit
higher
average
pension
payout
participant
employees
group
profit
higher
pension
level
although
individual
employee
may
reach
level
combination
payments
pension
fund
payments
income
maintenance
source
addition
integration
allows
employer
attain
selected
pension
level
drawing
resources
like
social
security
also
depend
employer
contributions
following
extensive
study
private
pension
plans
adoption
erisa
congress
expressly
preserved
option
pension
fund
integration
benefits
available
social
security
act
et
seq
ed
supp
iii
railroad
retirement
act
et
seq
ed
supp
iii
iv
congress
well
aware
pooling
nonpension
retirement
benefits
pension
funds
limit
total
income
maintenance
payments
received
individual
employees
reduce
cost
pension
plans
employers
indeed
considering
integration
option
house
ways
means
committee
expressly
acknowledged
tension
primary
goal
benefiting
employees
subsidiary
goal
containing
pension
costs
committee
report
noted
proposed
bill
affect
ability
plans
use
integration
procedures
reduce
benefits
pay
individuals
currently
covered
social
security
benefits
liberalized
committee
however
believes
practices
raise
important
issues
one
hand
objective
congress
increasing
social
security
benefits
might
considered
frustrated
extent
individuals
low
moderate
incomes
private
retirement
benefits
reduced
result
integration
procedures
hand
committee
much
aware
many
present
plans
fully
partly
integrated
elimination
integration
procedures
substantially
increase
cost
financing
private
plans
employees
whole
might
injured
rather
aided
cost
increases
resulted
slowing
growth
perhaps
even
eliminat
ing
private
retirement
plans
reprinted
legislative
history
employee
retirement
income
security
act
committee
print
compiled
senate
committee
labor
public
welfare
leg
setting
limitation
integration
social
security
railroad
retirement
benefits
congress
acknowledged
accepted
practice
rather
prohibiting
moreover
permitting
integration
least
federal
benefits
congress
find
necessary
add
exemption
purpose
stringent
nonforfeiture
protections
circumstances
unpersuaded
retirees
claim
nonforfeiture
provisions
force
prohibit
offset
pension
benefits
workers
compensation
awards
offsets
work
much
like
integration
pension
benefits
social
security
railroad
retirement
payments
individual
employee
remains
entitled
established
pension
level
payments
received
pension
fund
reduced
amount
received
workers
compensation
nonforfeiture
provision
applicability
kind
integration
analogous
reduction
permitted
social
security
railroad
retirement
payments
indeed
congressional
purpose
promoting
system
private
pensions
giving
employers
avenues
cutting
cost
pension
obligations
underlies
offset
possibilities
nonetheless
erisa
mention
integration
workers
compensation
legislative
history
equally
silent
point
argument
advanced
congress
approved
integration
pension
funds
federal
benefits
expressly
mentioned
act
current
regulation
issued
internal
revenue
service
however
goes
permits
integration
benefits
provided
federal
state
law
must
consider
whether
regulation
consistent
erisa
codified
cfr
treasury
regulation
provides
nonforfeitable
rights
considered
forfeitable
reason
fact
may
reduced
take
account
benefits
provided
social
security
act
federal
state
law
taken
account
determining
plan
benefits
regulation
interprets
section
internal
revenue
code
replicates
irs
purposes
erisa
nonforfeiture
provision
regulation
plainly
encompasses
awards
state
workers
compensation
laws
addition
revenue
rulings
issued
prior
erisa
irs
expressly
approved
reductions
pension
benefits
corresponding
workers
compensation
awards
see
rev
rul
part
cum
bull
rev
rul
cum
bull
retirees
contend
treasury
regulation
irs
rulings
effect
contravene
erisa
object
first
erisa
approval
integration
limited
social
security
railroad
retirement
payments
objection
precluded
conclusion
reduction
pension
benefits
based
integration
procedure
per
se
prohibited
level
pension
benefits
prescribed
erisa
retirees
remaining
objection
workers
compensation
awards
different
kind
social
security
railroad
retirement
payments
integration
authorized
rubric
developing
argument
retirees
claim
workers
compensation
provides
payments
injuries
social
security
railroad
retirement
supply
payments
solely
wages
lost
due
retirement
distinction
retirees
conclude
integration
pension
funds
workers
compensation
awards
lacks
rationale
behind
integration
pension
funds
social
security
railroad
retirement
retirees
claim
presumes
erisa
permits
integration
social
security
railroad
retirement
identity
purposes
pension
payments
purposes
integrated
benefits
even
funds
congress
clearly
approved
integration
purposes
share
identity
purpose
ascribed
petitioners
social
security
railroad
retirement
acts
provide
payments
disability
well
wages
lost
due
retirement
erisa
permits
pension
integration
without
distinguishing
different
kinds
benefits
furthermore
enacted
erisa
congress
knew
irs
rulings
permitting
integration
left
effect
rulings
draw
line
permissible
impermissible
integration
retirees
prefer
instead
include
workers
compensation
offsets
within
ambit
permissible
integration
irs
rulings
base
allowance
pension
payment
integration
three
factors
employer
must
contribute
benefit
funds
funds
must
designed
general
public
use
benefits
supply
must
correspond
benefits
available
pension
plan
irs
employed
considerations
approving
integration
workers
compensation
benefits
rev
rul
part
cum
bull
rev
rul
cum
bull
contrast
irs
disallowed
offsets
pension
benefits
damages
recovered
employee
action
employer
rev
rul
part
cum
bull
rev
rul
cum
bull
irs
also
permitted
integration
reimbursement
medical
expenses
fixed
sums
made
bodily
impairment
payments
match
benefits
available
pension
plan
qualified
internal
revenue
code
erisa
rev
rul
cum
bull
similarly
irs
disapproved
integration
unemployment
compensation
payment
temporary
layoffs
kind
benefit
comparable
permitted
qualified
pension
plan
without
speaking
directly
rationale
congress
embraced
irs
rulings
see
conf
leg
hist
approving
existing
antidiscrimination
rules
congress
thereby
permitted
integration
along
lines
already
approved
irs
specifically
allowed
pension
benefit
offsets
based
workers
compensation
judicial
function
policy
decisions
legislature
matter
appealing
may
find
contrary
rationales
final
argument
retirees
claim
defer
policy
decisions
state
legislature
claim
turn
iii
new
jersey
legislature
attempted
outlaw
offset
clauses
providing
right
compensation
granted
new
jersey
workers
compensation
act
may
set
disability
pension
benefits
payments
shall
set
employees
retirement
pension
benefits
payments
stat
ann
west
supp
emphasis
added
resolve
retirees
claim
state
policy
govern
must
determine
whether
state
laws
erisa
analysis
problem
must
guided
respect
separate
spheres
governmental
authority
preserved
federalist
system
although
supremacy
clause
invalidates
state
laws
interfere
contrary
laws
congress
gibbons
ogden
wheat
exercise
federal
supremacy
lightly
presumed
new
york
dept
social
services
dublino
quoting
schwartz
texas
recently
reiterated
reemption
state
law
federal
statute
regulation
favored
absence
persuasive
reasons
either
nature
regulated
subject
matter
permits
conclusion
congress
unmistakably
ordained
chicago
north
western
transp
kalo
brick
tile
quoting
florida
lime
avocado
growers
paul
see
jones
rath
packing
perez
campbell
rice
santa
fe
elevator
hines
davidowitz
instance
assisted
explicit
congressional
statement
effect
action
chapter
erisa
defines
scope
federal
protection
employee
pension
benefits
provides
provisions
subchapter
shall
supersede
state
laws
insofar
may
hereafter
relate
employee
benefit
plan
described
section
title
exempt
section
title
agree
conclusion
reached
appeals
arrive
different
route
whatever
purpose
purposes
new
jersey
statute
conclude
relate
pension
plans
governed
erisa
eliminates
one
method
calculating
pension
benefits
integration
permitted
federal
law
erisa
permits
integration
pension
funds
public
income
maintenance
moneys
purpose
calculating
benefits
irs
interpretation
approves
integration
exact
funds
addressed
new
jersey
workers
compensation
law
new
jersey
effort
ban
pension
benefit
offsets
based
workers
compensation
applies
directly
calculation
technique
need
determine
outer
bounds
erisa
language
find
new
jersey
provision
impermissible
intrusion
federal
regulatory
scheme
moment
new
jersey
intrudes
indirectly
workers
compensation
law
rather
directly
statute
called
pension
regulation
erisa
makes
clear
even
indirect
state
action
bearing
private
pensions
may
encroach
upon
area
exclusive
federal
concern
purposes
provision
erisa
defines
term
state
include
state
political
subdivision
thereof
agency
instrumentality
either
purports
regulate
directly
indirectly
terms
conditions
employee
benefit
plans
covered
subchapter
emphasis
added
erisa
authors
clearly
meant
preclude
avoiding
form
substance
preemption
provision
another
consideration
bolsters
conclusion
new
jersey
provision
insofar
bears
pensions
regulated
erisa
erisa
leaves
integration
along
pension
calculation
techniques
subject
discretion
pension
plan
designers
see
supra
pension
plans
emerge
collective
bargaining
additional
federal
interest
precluding
state
interference
negotiations
calls
state
efforts
regulate
pension
terms
see
teamsters
oliver
railway
employees
hanson
cf
motor
coach
employees
lockridge
san
diego
building
trades
council
garmon
subject
collective
bargaining
pension
terms
become
expressions
federal
law
requiring
intrusive
state
law
iv
conclude
stat
ann
west
supp
federal
law
insofar
bears
pension
plans
governed
erisa
find
congress
contemplated
approved
kind
pension
provisions
challenged
permit
offsets
pension
benefits
based
workers
compensation
awards
decision
appeals
affirmed
footnotes
retirement
income
payments
shall
reduced
entire
amount
payments
member
eligible
receive
statutes
pertaining
workmen
compensation
occupational
disease
unemployment
compensation
cash
sickness
benefits
similar
laws
primary
social
security
benefits
presently
effect
may
enacted
time
time
payments
paid
concurrently
retirement
income
determining
monthly
benefits
payable
plan
deduction
shall
made
unless
prohibited
law
equivalent
part
workmen
compensation
including
compromise
redemption
settlements
payable
employee
reason
law
political
subdivision
thereof
shall
enacted
provided
deductions
shall
extent
workmen
compensation
provided
premiums
taxes
payments
paid
expense
corporation
except
deduction
shall
made
following
workmen
compensation
payments
specifically
allocated
hospitalization
medical
expense
fixed
statutory
payments
loss
bodily
member
loss
use
bodily
member
payments
loss
industrial
vision
compromise
redemption
settlements
payable
prior
date
monthly
pension
benefits
first
become
payable
workmen
compensation
payments
paid
claim
filed
later
two
years
breaking
seniority
former
employees
sought
permanently
enjoin
offsets
recover
damages
offsets
already
made
similar
relief
pursued
several
former
employees
general
motors
brought
suit
behalf
others
similarly
situated
see
infra
regulation
provides
nonforfeitable
rights
considered
forfeitable
reason
fact
may
reduced
take
account
benefits
provided
social
security
act
federal
state
law
taken
account
determining
plan
benefits
cfr
statement
findings
declaration
policy
congress
noted
despite
enormous
growth
plans
many
employees
long
years
employment
losing
anticipated
retirement
benefits
owing
lack
vesting
provisions
plans
erisa
designed
prescribe
minimum
vesting
accrual
standards
response
problems
ibid
ensure
employee
pension
expectations
defeated
act
establishes
minimum
rules
employee
participation
funding
standards
increase
solvency
pension
plans
fiduciary
standards
plan
managers
insurance
program
case
plan
termination
ed
supp
iii
erisa
establishes
three
accrual
techniques
pension
plans
covered
act
see
infra
similarly
erisa
establishes
several
approved
vesting
schedules
approved
schedules
time
prior
normal
retirement
age
given
period
service
combination
age
length
service
employee
guaranteed
interest
pension
benefit
see
infra
erisa
defines
normal
retirement
benefit
greater
early
retirement
benefit
plan
benefit
plan
commencing
normal
retirement
age
statute
expressly
exempts
forfeiture
ban
offsets
contingent
employee
death
occur
employee
takes
job
certain
circumstances
due
certain
retroactive
amendments
pension
plan
result
withdrawals
benefits
derived
mandatory
contributions
retirees
correctly
point
workers
compensation
offsets
fall
none
categories
three
different
accrual
practices
approved
defined
benefits
plans
described
one
prescribes
minimum
percentage
total
retirement
benefit
must
accrued
given
year
another
permits
use
accrual
formula
long
accrual
rate
given
year
service
vary
beyond
specified
percentage
accrual
rate
year
plan
third
essentially
pro
rata
rule
given
year
employee
accrued
benefit
proportionate
number
years
service
compared
number
total
years
service
appropriate
normal
retirement
age
congress
approved
delay
employee
acquisition
vested
right
portions
pension
derived
employer
contributions
thus
erisa
specifies
right
hinged
minimum
length
service
employee
reaching
minimum
lose
right
even
continue
working
particular
employer
reaching
retirement
age
minimum
period
service
calculated
three
different
formulas
two
permit
gradual
vesting
percentages
accrued
benefits
time
compare
see
also
schiller
proposed
erisa
vesting
regulations
seem
discussing
internal
revenue
service
implementation
vesting
provisions
essence
pension
plans
qualifying
tax
treatment
advantageous
employer
must
ensure
nonforfeiture
accrued
benefits
derived
employee
contributions
must
use
vesting
accrual
rates
assuring
portions
benefits
derived
employer
contributions
employee
leave
job
normal
retirement
age
minimum
results
formulas
approving
gradual
vesting
time
benefits
derived
employer
contributions
see
alternatively
plan
may
comply
erisa
employee
least
years
service
nonforfeitable
right
percent
accrued
benefit
derived
employer
contributions
vesting
nonforfeiture
pension
benefits
provisions
bill
discussed
substantially
identical
portions
bill
ultimately
enacted
erisa
bill
reported
conference
committee
included
additional
provision
restrict
temporarily
increases
pension
reductions
due
increases
social
security
benefits
occurring
december
conf
leg
hist
senator
harrison
williams
explained
provision
ultimately
deleted
told
greatly
increase
costs
private
pension
plans
something
sure
none
senators
like
see
occur
particularly
true
increased
pension
costs
result
termination
private
pension
plans
certainly
intent
legislation
designed
improve
encourage
expansion
private
pension
plans
cong
rec
leg
hist
appeals
characterized
treasury
regulation
legislative
regulation
entitled
restricted
scope
review
applied
interpretive
rules
nonetheless
government
represents
treasury
regulation
interpretive
rule
brief
amicus
curiae
agency
empowered
enact
legislative
rules
may
choose
issue
nonlegislative
statements
review
treasury
regulation
scrutiny
applicable
interpretive
rules
due
deference
consistent
agency
practice
see
batterton
francis
batterton
marshall
app
davis
administrative
law
treatise
ed
furthermore
integration
workers
compensation
approved
agency
created
erisa
guarantee
payment
nonforfeitable
pension
benefits
despite
termination
relevant
pension
plan
agency
pension
benefit
guaranty
corporation
defined
benefits
guarantees
include
benefit
payable
annuity
one
payments
related
thereto
participant
permanently
leaves
permanently
left
covered
employment
surviving
beneficiary
payments
combination
social
security
railroad
retirement
workmen
compensation
benefits
provide
substantially
level
income
recipient
cfr
house
ways
means
committee
report
proposed
codification
contemporaneous
administrative
practice
developed
irs
practice
included
irs
approval
integration
procedures
see
cfr
rev
rul
part
cum
bull
rev
rul
cum
bull
irs
rulings
implemented
provision
internal
revenue
code
forbids
favorable
tax
treatment
pension
plans
discriminating
favor
company
officers
shareholders
highly
compensated
employees
internal
revenue
code
long
enactment
erisa
specified
forbidden
discrimination
include
differences
benefits
retirement
benefits
created
state
federal
law
supp
iii
irs
consistently
interpreted
discrimination
provision
permit
pension
benefit
integration
social
security
funds
receiving
employer
contributions
making
benefits
available
general
public
see
rev
rul
cum
bull
rev
rul
cum
bull
rev
rul
cum
bull
rev
rul
cum
bull
congress
essentially
approved
rulings
conference
committee
reported
conferees
intend
antidiscrimination
rules
present
law
areas
vesting
schedule
changed
thus
present
antidiscrimination
rules
respect
coverage
respect
contributions
benefits
remain
effect
conf
leg
hist
retirees
argue
workers
compensation
treated
tort
damages
purposes
integration
pension
payments
although
workers
compensation
resembles
tort
judgments
employers
employee
injuries
differences
explain
different
treatment
irs
tort
judgment
typically
represents
finding
employer
fault
employee
injury
workers
compensation
contrast
generally
available
showing
employer
fault
employee
lack
fault
injury
larson
workmen
compensation
law
treating
two
sources
payments
differently
irs
may
concluded
workers
compensation
much
income
maintenance
program
responding
wage
loss
remuneration
injury
therefore
may
integrated
pension
benefits
advantage
entire
employee
group
see
generally
cf
richardson
belcher
reductions
social
security
based
workers
compensation
comports
due
process
light
agency
may
well
employed
rationale
proffered
retirees
two
benefits
systems
must
identical
purposes
may
integrated
departed
retirees
reasoning
concluding
two
benefit
systems
share
purpose
replacing
lost
wages
whatever
cause
regardless
view
workers
compensation
finds
compelling
must
defer
consistent
agency
position
reasonable
consonant
act
note
general
motors
offset
clause
avoids
ambiguity
point
disallows
deductions
medical
expenses
fixed
payments
bodily
impairment
see
supra
although
plan
silent
point
certainly
subject
irs
regulation
adopted
amendment
new
jersey
workers
compensation
act
provision
reversed
new
jersey
prior
approval
workers
compensation
offsets
collectively
bargained
pension
agreements
see
brief
appellee
new
jersey
pp
scope
federal
concern
however
limited
erisa
statute
explicitly
preserves
state
regulation
insurance
banking
securities
generally
applicable
criminal
law
state
erisa
also
exempts
coverage
several
kinds
plans
may
subject
state
regulation
see
also
conf
leg
hist
erisa
clause
exempts
state
laws
relating
pension
plans
fall
within
act
coverage
see
supra
exemptions
applicable
exemption
conceivable
relevance
pertains
state
laws
governing
plans
maintained
solely
purpose
complying
applicable
workmen
compensation
laws
retirees
concede
exception
inapplicable
general
motors
plan
maintained
solely
comply
workmen
compensation
law
brief
petitioners
retirees
however
claim
exception
apply
generally
plans
governed
state
workers
compensation
laws
reason
plan
designed
comply
applicable
workmen
compensation
law
preempted
erisa
fortiori
underlying
statute
plan
permitted
comply
equally
escapes
coverage
reply
brief
appellants
reasoning
wreaks
havoc
erisa
plain
language
plans
state
laws
relevant
state
laws
portions
thereof
survive
provision
relating
plans
exempted
erisa
scope
relevant
exemption
erisa
coverage
plans
maintained
solely
compliance
state
workers
compensation
laws
bearing
plans
involved
broadly
serve
employee
needs
result
collective
bargaining
retirees
claim
plans
involved
free
erisa
coverage
claim
exception
restricted
laws
governing
exempted
plans
courts
reached
varying
conclusions
meaning
erisa
language
contexts
see
american
telephone
telegraph
merry
stone
stone
supp
nd
cal
gast
state
app
express
views
merits
decisions
light
reading
erisa
appeals
declined
reach
issue
national
labor
relations
act
issue
however
addressed
district
alessi
civ
nj
reasoned
federal
labor
law
extend
far
preclude
state
regulation
conduct
touching
deeply
rooted
local
concerns
ibid
citing
san
diego
building
trades
council
garmon
although
reasoning
may
apply
contexts
find
compelling
light
direct
clash
state
statute
federal
policy
keep
calculation
pension
benefits
subject
either
negotiations
federal
legislation
context
integration
pension
benefits
public
income
maintenance
funds
forbidden
terms
pension
plans
new
federal
legislation
conclusion
follows
naturally
view
plurality
malone
white
motor
congress
preserved
state
role
pension
regulation
erisa
plurality
created
exception
general
rule
state
regulation
collective
bargaining
exception
longer
applies
however
erisa
express
intent
eliminated
state
regulation
pension
plans