universal
camera
labor
argued
decided
february
national
labor
relations
board
ordered
petitioner
reinstate
back
pay
employee
found
discharged
gave
certain
testimony
another
proceeding
national
labor
relations
act
evidence
reason
discharge
conflicting
board
overruled
examiner
findings
fact
recommendation
proceedings
dismissed
decreeing
enforcement
appeals
held
board
findings
fact
supported
substantial
evidence
record
considered
whole
within
meaning
national
labor
relations
act
amended
holding
based
partly
view
amendments
broadened
scope
judicial
review
board
rejection
examiner
findings
fact
without
relevance
determining
whether
board
findings
supported
substantial
evidence
held
light
legislative
history
standard
proof
required
national
labor
relations
act
amended
labor
management
relations
act
support
decision
labor
board
judicial
review
exacted
courts
reviewing
every
administrative
action
subject
administrative
procedure
act
pp
amending
national
labor
relations
act
require
judicial
review
board
findings
fact
must
supported
substantial
evidence
record
considered
whole
congress
made
clear
reviewing
barred
setting
aside
board
decision
conscientiously
find
evidence
supporting
decision
substantial
viewed
light
record
entirety
furnishes
including
body
evidence
opposed
board
view
pp
read
light
legislative
history
administrative
procedure
act
labor
management
relations
act
require
courts
assume
responsibility
reasonableness
fairness
labor
board
decisions
courts
shown
past
pp
whether
record
whole
substantial
evidence
support
agency
findings
question
congress
placed
keeping
courts
appeals
intervene
rate
instance
standard
appears
misapprehended
grossly
misapplied
appeals
erred
holding
barred
taking
account
report
examiner
questions
fact
insofar
report
rejected
board
pp
trial
examiner
findings
unassailable
master
may
reversed
board
even
clearly
erroneous
reviewing
need
give
trial
examiner
findings
weight
reason
light
judicial
experience
deserve
accorded
relevance
reasonably
command
answering
comprehensive
question
whether
evidence
supporting
board
order
substantial
pp
cause
remanded
appeals
left
free
grant
deny
enforcement
thinks
principles
expressed
opinion
dictate
appeals
decreed
enforcement
order
national
labor
relations
board
requiring
petitioner
reinstate
employee
back
pay
cease
desist
discriminating
employee
files
charges
gives
testimony
national
labor
relations
act
granted
certiorari
judgment
vacated
cause
remanded
special
leave
frederick
livingston
pro
hac
vice
argued
cause
petitioner
brief
james
hays
mozart
ratner
argued
cause
respondent
brief
solicitor
general
perlman
david
findling
bernard
dunau
justice
frankfurter
delivered
opinion
essential
issue
raised
case
companion
labor
board
pittsburgh
steamship
post
effect
administrative
procedure
act
legislation
colloquially
known
act
duty
courts
appeals
called
upon
review
orders
national
labor
relations
board
appeals
second
circuit
granted
enforcement
order
directing
main
petitioner
reinstate
back
pay
employee
found
discharged
gave
testimony
wagner
act
cease
desist
discriminating
employee
files
charges
gives
testimony
act
judge
swan
dissenting
decreed
full
enforcement
order
views
regarding
effect
new
legislation
relation
board
courts
appeals
enforcement
board
orders
conflicted
appeals
sixth
circuit
brought
cases
clash
opinion
obviously
required
settlement
want
certainty
judicial
review
labor
board
decisions
partly
reflects
intractability
formula
furnish
definiteness
content
impalpable
factors
involved
judicial
review
part
doubts
nature
reviewing
power
uncertainties
application
derive
history
extent
elucidation
history
may
clear
away
wagner
act
provided
findings
board
facts
supported
evidence
shall
conclusive
act
july
stat
read
evidence
mean
substantial
evidence
washington
coach
labor
board
said
ubstantial
evidence
mere
scintilla
means
relevant
evidence
reasonable
mind
might
accept
adequate
support
conclusion
consolidated
edison
labor
board
accordingly
must
create
suspicion
existence
fact
established
must
enough
justify
trial
jury
refusal
direct
verdict
conclusion
sought
drawn
one
fact
jury
labor
board
columbian
enameling
stamping
smoothness
substantial
evidence
formula
standard
reviewing
evidentiary
validity
board
findings
established
currency
inevitably
variant
applications
standard
conflicting
evidence
soon
brought
contrariety
views
due
course
bred
criticism
even
though
whole
record
may
canvassed
order
determine
whether
evidentiary
foundation
determination
board
substantial
phrasing
process
review
readily
lent
notion
enough
evidence
supporting
board
result
substantial
considered
fair
say
imperceptible
steps
regard
function
board
led
assumption
requirements
wagner
act
met
reviewing
find
record
evidence
viewed
isolation
substantiated
board
findings
compare
labor
board
waterman
steamship
labor
board
bradford
dyeing
see
labor
board
nevada
consolidated
copper
say
every
member
consciously
guided
view
ever
explicitly
avowed
practice
doctrine
matters
belief
justifiably
arose
construed
obligation
review
criticism
contracted
reviewing
power
reinforced
dissatisfaction
felt
various
quarters
board
administration
wagner
act
years
preceding
war
scheme
act
attacked
inherently
unfair
fusion
functions
prosecutor
judge
accusations
partisan
bias
wanting
irresponsible
admission
weighing
hearsay
opinion
emotional
speculation
place
factual
evidence
said
serious
menace
doubt
perhaps
even
much
criticism
baseless
surely
reckless
relevant
however
climate
opinion
thereby
generated
effect
congress
protests
shocking
injustices
intimations
judicial
abdication
courts
granted
enforcement
board
orders
stimulated
pressures
legislative
relief
alleged
administrative
excesses
strength
pressures
reflected
passage
bill
vetoed
president
roosevelt
partly
imposed
unduly
rigid
limitations
administrative
process
partly
investigation
actual
operation
administrative
process
conducted
experienced
committee
appointed
attorney
general
worth
noting
despite
aim
tighten
control
administrative
determinations
fact
bill
contented
conventional
formula
agency
decision
set
aside
findings
fact
supported
substantial
evidence
final
report
attorney
general
committee
submitted
january
majority
concluded
issatisfaction
existing
standards
scope
judicial
review
derives
largely
dissatisfaction
procedures
employed
administrative
bodies
departure
substantial
evidence
test
thought
either
create
unnecessary
uncertainty
transfer
courts
responsibility
ascertaining
assaying
matters
significance
lies
outside
judicial
competence
accordingly
recommended
legislation
embodying
general
scheme
judicial
review
three
members
committee
registered
dissent
view
present
system
lack
system
judicial
review
led
inconsistency
uncertainty
reported
prevalent
interpretation
substantial
evidence
rule
called
substantial
evidence
found
anywhere
record
support
conclusions
fact
courts
said
obliged
sustain
decision
without
reference
heavily
countervailing
evidence
may
preponderate
unless
indeed
stage
arbitrary
decision
reached
interpretation
courts
need
read
one
side
case
find
evidence
administrative
action
sustained
record
contrary
ignored
view
led
recommend
congress
enact
principles
review
applicable
agencies
excepted
unique
characteristics
one
principles
expressed
formula
judicial
review
extend
findings
inferences
conclusions
fact
unsupported
upon
whole
record
substantial
evidence
far
history
movement
enlarged
review
reveals
phrase
upon
whole
record
makes
first
appearance
recommendation
minority
attorney
general
committee
evidence
close
relationship
phrase
criticism
arose
important
substance
formula
judicial
review
found
way
statute
books
congress
unquestioning
might
even
say
uncritical
unanimity
enacted
administrative
procedure
act
one
tempted
say
uncritical
legislative
history
act
hardly
speaks
clarity
purpose
congress
supposedly
furnishes
courts
order
enable
enforce
true
one
hand
sponsors
legislation
indicated
reaffirming
prevailing
substantial
evidence
test
equal
clarity
expressed
disapproval
manner
courts
applying
standard
committee
reports
houses
refer
practice
agencies
rely
upon
suspicion
surmise
implications
plainly
incredible
evidence
indicate
courts
exact
higher
standards
exercise
independent
judgment
consideration
whole
record
similar
dissatisfaction
restricted
application
substantial
evidence
test
reflected
legislative
history
act
bill
reported
house
provided
findings
board
facts
shall
conclusive
unless
made
appear
satisfaction
either
findings
fact
manifest
weight
evidence
findings
fact
supported
substantial
evidence
bill
left
house
provision
early
committee
prints
senate
provided
review
weight
evidence
clearly
erroneous
standards
senate
committee
report
relates
finally
decided
conform
statute
corresponding
section
administrative
procedure
act
substantial
evidence
test
prevails
order
clarify
ambiguity
statute
however
committee
inserted
words
questions
fact
supported
substantial
evidence
record
considered
whole
phraseology
adopted
senate
house
conferees
agreed
reported
house
believed
provisions
conference
agreement
relating
courts
reviewing
power
adequate
preclude
decisions
nevada
consol
copper
wilson
columbia
products
union
pacific
stages
hearst
republic
aviation
le
tourneau
etc
cases
supra
without
unduly
burdening
courts
senate
version
became
law
fair
say
congress
expressed
mood
expressed
mood
merely
oratory
legislation
legislation
mood
must
respected
even
though
serve
standard
judgment
body
rigid
rules
assuring
sameness
application
enforcement
broad
standards
implies
subtlety
mind
solidity
judgment
us
question
congress
may
assume
qualities
federal
judiciary
legislative
story
summarized
two
concrete
conclusions
emerge
one
identity
aim
administrative
procedure
act
act
regarding
proof
labor
board
must
support
decision
congress
left
room
doubt
kind
scrutiny
appeals
must
give
record
board
satisfy
board
order
rests
adequate
proof
mischievous
find
scope
review
act
different
administrative
procedure
act
senate
committee
reported
review
clause
act
expressly
indicated
two
standards
conform
regard
wording
two
acts
purposes
judicial
administration
identical
hold
standard
proof
specifically
required
labor
board
act
exacted
courts
reviewing
every
administrative
action
subject
administrative
procedure
act
whether
ever
permissible
courts
determine
substantiality
evidence
supporting
labor
board
decision
merely
basis
evidence
justified
without
taking
account
contradictory
evidence
evidence
conflicting
inferences
drawn
new
legislation
definitively
precludes
theory
review
bars
practice
substantiality
evidence
must
take
account
whatever
record
fairly
detracts
weight
clearly
significance
requirement
statutes
courts
consider
whole
record
committee
reports
adoption
administrative
procedure
act
minority
views
attorney
general
committee
demonstrate
enjoin
duty
reviewing
one
important
purposes
movement
eventuated
enactment
sure
requirement
canvassing
whole
record
order
ascertain
substantiality
furnish
calculus
value
reviewing
assess
evidence
intended
negative
function
labor
board
one
agencies
presumably
equipped
informed
experience
deal
specialized
field
knowledge
whose
findings
within
field
carry
authority
expertness
courts
possess
therefore
must
respect
mean
even
matters
requiring
expertise
may
displace
board
choice
two
fairly
conflicting
views
even
though
justifiably
made
different
choice
matter
de
novo
congress
merely
made
clear
reviewing
barred
setting
aside
board
decision
conscientiously
find
evidence
supporting
decision
substantial
viewed
light
record
entirety
furnishes
including
body
evidence
opposed
board
view
remains
question
whether
enactment
two
statutes
altered
scope
review
require
substantiality
determined
light
record
relevantly
presents
formula
judicial
review
administrative
action
may
afford
grounds
certitude
assure
certainty
application
scope
judicial
discretion
applying
formula
avoided
falsifying
actual
process
judging
using
formula
instrument
futile
casuistry
often
repeated
judges
automata
ultimate
reliance
fair
operation
standard
judiciary
high
competence
character
constant
play
informed
professional
critique
upon
work
since
precise
way
courts
interfere
agency
findings
imprisoned
within
form
words
new
formulas
attempting
rephrase
old
likely
helpful
old
talismanic
words
avoid
process
judgment
difficulty
escape
relation
problem
use
undefined
defining
terms
whatever
changes
made
administrative
procedure
acts
clearly
within
area
precise
definition
impossible
retention
familiar
substantial
evidence
terminology
indicates
drastic
reversal
attitude
intended
standard
leaving
unavoidable
margin
individual
judgment
leave
judicial
judgment
large
even
though
phrasing
standard
wholly
fence
legislative
history
acts
demonstrates
purpose
impose
courts
responsibility
always
recognized
course
statute
committee
report
interpreting
fair
interpretation
statute
often
art
proliferating
purpose
brooklyn
national
commissioner
revealed
demonstrable
forces
produced
precise
phrasing
adoption
statutes
substantial
evidence
test
response
pressures
stricter
uniform
practice
reflection
approval
existing
practices
find
change
elusive
precisely
defined
mean
may
ignored
fail
duty
effectuate
congress
denied
recognition
expressed
congressional
disapproval
finality
accorded
labor
board
findings
decisions
lower
courts
even
atmosphere
may
favored
decisions
conclude
therefore
administrative
procedure
act
act
direct
courts
must
assume
responsibility
reasonableness
fairness
labor
board
decisions
courts
shown
past
reviewing
courts
must
influenced
feeling
abdicate
conventional
judicial
function
congress
imposed
responsibility
assuring
board
keeps
within
reasonable
grounds
responsibility
less
real
limited
enforcing
requirement
evidence
appear
substantial
viewed
record
whole
courts
invested
authority
enjoying
prestige
courts
appeals
board
findings
entitled
respect
must
nonetheless
set
aside
record
appeals
clearly
precludes
board
decision
justified
fair
estimate
worth
testimony
witnesses
informed
judgment
matters
within
special
competence
follows
enactment
statutes
require
every
appeals
alter
practice
perhaps
majority
always
applied
attitude
reflected
legislation
explore
whether
particular
alter
practice
divert
attention
application
standard
prescribed
futile
inquiry
nature
test
formerly
used
particular
power
review
correctness
application
present
standard
seldom
called
action
whether
record
whole
substantial
evidence
support
agency
findings
question
congress
placed
keeping
courts
appeals
intervene
rare
instance
standard
appears
misapprehended
grossly
misapplied
ii
disagreement
view
scope
review
labor
board
decisions
unaltered
recent
legislation
noted
require
reversal
decision
may
applied
standard
review
satisfies
present
congressional
requirement
decision
appeals
assailed
two
grounds
said
erred
holding
barred
taking
account
report
examiner
questions
fact
insofar
report
rejected
board
board
order
supported
substantial
evidence
record
considered
whole
even
apart
validity
refusal
consider
rejected
portions
examiner
report
latter
contention
easily
met
true
two
earlier
decisions
among
disapproved
congress
disapproval
seen
may
well
caused
unintended
intimations
judicial
phrasing
event
clear
opinion
case
fact
consider
record
whole
deem
merely
judicial
echo
board
conclusion
testimony
company
witnesses
inconsistent
clear
evidence
complaining
employee
discharged
officer
one
time
influenced
appearance
board
hearing
record
say
error
grant
enforcement
first
contention
however
raises
serious
questions
turn
iii
appeals
deemed
bound
board
rejection
examiner
findings
considered
findings
unassailable
master
section
labor
management
relations
act
provides
upon
preponderance
testimony
taken
board
shall
opinion
person
named
complaint
engaged
engaging
unfair
labor
practice
board
shall
state
findings
fact
stat
supp
iii
responsibility
decision
thus
placed
board
wholly
inconsistent
notion
power
reverse
examiner
findings
clearly
erroneous
limitation
make
drastic
departure
prior
administrative
practice
explicitness
required
appeals
concluded
premise
although
board
wrong
totally
disregarding
findings
practically
impossible
upon
review
findings
board
substitutes
consider
board
reversal
factor
decision
say
find
middle
ground
treating
reversal
error
whenever
done
judge
master
equity
much
respect
logical
acumen
chief
judge
appeals
find
pinioned
horns
dilemma
aware
give
examiner
findings
less
finality
master
yet
entitle
consideration
striking
account
introduce
another
unruly
factor
judgmatical
process
review
fashion
exclusionary
rule
merely
reduce
number
imponderables
considered
reviewing
courts
act
provides
findings
board
respect
questions
fact
supported
substantial
evidence
record
considered
whole
shall
conclusive
stat
supp
iii
surely
examiner
report
much
part
record
complaint
testimony
according
administrative
procedure
act
decisions
including
initial
recommended
tentative
decisions
shall
become
part
record
stat
found
act
provision
judicial
review
meaning
act
similarity
two
statutes
language
purpose
also
requires
definition
record
found
administrative
procedure
act
construed
applicable
well
term
record
used
act
therefore
difficult
escape
conclusion
plain
language
statutes
directs
reviewing
determine
substantiality
evidence
record
including
examiner
report
conclusion
confirmed
indications
legislative
history
enhancement
status
function
trial
examiner
one
important
purposes
movement
administrative
reform
aim
set
forth
attorney
general
committee
administrative
procedure
general
relationship
upon
appeal
hearing
commissioner
agency
considerable
extent
trial
appellate
conclusions
interpretations
law
policy
course
open
full
review
hand
matters
hearing
commissioner
heard
evidence
seen
witnesses
best
qualified
decide
agency
reluctant
disturb
findings
unless
error
clearly
shown
refusal
make
mandatory
recommendations
attorney
general
committee
construed
repudiation
nothing
statutes
suggests
labor
board
influenced
examiner
opportunity
observe
witnesses
hears
sees
board
nothing
suggests
reviewing
courts
give
examiner
report
probative
force
intrinsically
commands
contrary
administrative
procedure
act
contains
detailed
provisions
designed
maintain
high
standards
independence
competence
examiners
section
labor
management
relations
act
requires
examiners
shall
issue
proposed
report
together
recommended
order
statutes
thus
evince
purpose
increase
importance
role
examiners
administrative
process
high
standards
public
administration
counsel
attribute
labor
board
examiners
due
regard
responsibility
congress
imposes
competence
discharge
committee
reports
also
make
clear
sponsors
legislation
thought
statutes
gave
significance
findings
examiners
thus
senate
committee
responsible
administrative
procedure
act
explained
report
examiners
decisions
consequence
example
extent
material
facts
case
depend
determination
credibility
witnesses
shown
demeanor
conduct
hearing
house
report
reflects
attitude
senate
committee
report
act
likewise
indicates
regard
responsibility
devolving
examiner
require
examiner
findings
given
weight
reason
light
judicial
experience
deserve
substantial
evidence
standard
modified
way
board
examiner
disagree
intend
recognize
evidence
supporting
conclusion
may
less
substantial
impartial
experienced
examiner
observed
witnesses
lived
case
drawn
conclusions
different
board
reached
conclusion
findings
examiner
considered
along
consistency
inherent
probability
testimony
significance
report
course
depends
largely
importance
credibility
particular
case
give
significance
seem
us
materially
difficult
heed
factors
sum
determine
whether
evidence
substantial
direction
law
moves
often
guide
decision
particular
cases
serves
confirm
conclusion
however
halting
progress
trend
litigation
toward
rational
inquiry
truth
tribunal
considers
everything
logically
probative
matter
requiring
proved
thayer
preliminary
treatise
evidence
funk
refused
accept
assumptions
fact
demonstrably
false
provident
trust
even
agreed
parties
swift
hocking
valley
machinery
discovery
evidence
strengthened
boundaries
judicial
notice
slowly
perceptibly
enlarged
reverse
process
courts
deny
examiners
findings
probative
force
conduct
affairs
outside
courtroom
therefore
remand
cause
appeals
reconsideration
record
accord
findings
trial
examiner
relevance
reasonably
command
answering
comprehensive
question
whether
evidence
supporting
board
order
substantial
need
limit
reexamination
case
effect
report
decision
leave
free
grant
deny
enforcement
thinks
principles
expressed
opinion
dictate
judgment
vacated
cause
remanded
footnotes
see
testimony
dean
stason
subcommittee
senate
committee
judiciary
hearings
sess
see
example
remarks
laird
bell
chairman
committee
administrative
law
chicago
bar
association
writing
american
bar
association
journal
see
gall
current
labor
problem
view
industry
iowa
rev
charge
made
majority
special
committee
house
appointed
investigate
national
labor
relations
board
sess
professor
gellhorn
linfield
reached
conclusion
extended
investigation
denunciations
find
support
fact
gellhorn
linfield
politics
labor
relations
rev
see
also
millis
brown
wagner
act
wilson
labor
board
labor
board
standard
oil
judge
learned
hand
said
understand
law
decision
board
upon
issue
practical
purposes
open
us
certainly
decided
substantial
evidence
disestablished
union
immediately
preceded
period
dominated
union
recognize
momentous
may
abdication
power
review
cong
rec
reprinted
doc
sess
final
report
referring
proposals
enlarge
scope
review
permit
inquiry
whether
findings
supported
weight
evidence
majority
said
assuming
change
may
desirable
respect
special
administrative
determinations
serious
objection
adoption
general
application
first
place
question
much
change
amendment
produce
respect
courts
judgments
specialized
tribunals
carefully
considered
problems
evidence
legislated
away
line
substantial
evidence
weight
evidence
easily
drawn
particularly
confined
written
record
limited
amount
time
opportunity
question
witnesses
testimony
seems
hazy
leaves
lingering
doubts
unanswered
substantial
evidence
may
well
equivalent
weight
evidence
tribunal
one
confidence
greater
opportunities
accurate
determination
already
decided
second
place
wisdom
general
change
review
weight
evidence
questionable
change
require
courts
determine
independently
way
evidence
preponderates
administrative
tribunals
turned
little
media
transmission
evidence
courts
destroy
values
adjudication
fact
experts
specialists
field
involved
divide
responsibility
administrative
adjudications
final
report
minority
enumerated
four
existing
deficiencies
judicial
review
haphazard
uncertain
variable
results
present
system
lack
system
judicial
review
interpretation
permitting
substantiality
determined
without
taking
account
conflicting
evidence
failure
existing
formulas
take
account
differences
various
types
fact
determinations
practice
determining
standards
review
procedure
courts
recommended
congress
finds
practicable
examine
situation
particular
agencies
provide
definitely
general
legislation
availability
scope
judicial
review
order
reduce
uncertainty
variability
committee
recognizes
report
several
principal
subjects
judicial
review
including
constitutional
questions
statutory
interpretation
procedure
support
findings
fact
adequate
evidence
last
obviously
think
mean
support
findings
fact
including
inferences
conclusion
fact
upon
whole
record
legislative
provision
however
qualified
direction
courts
respect
experience
technical
competence
specialized
knowledge
discretionary
authority
agency
framed
provision
appendix
statement
scope
review
findings
conclusions
decisions
case
reviewing
regardless
form
review
proceeding
shall
consider
decide
far
necessary
decision
raised
parties
relevant
questions
constitutional
right
power
privilege
immunity
statutory
authority
jurisdiction
agency
lawfulness
adequacy
procedure
findings
inferences
conclusions
fact
unsupported
upon
whole
record
substantial
evidence
administrative
action
otherwise
arbitrary
capricious
provided
however
upon
review
due
weight
shall
accorded
experience
technical
competence
specialized
knowledge
legislative
policy
agency
involved
well
discretionary
authority
conferred
upon
stat
et
seq
form
finally
adopted
reads
follows
sec
except
far
statutes
preclude
judicial
review
agency
action
law
committed
agency
discretion
scope
review
far
necessary
decision
presented
reviewing
shall
decide
relevant
questions
law
interpret
constitutional
statutory
provisions
determine
meaning
applicability
terms
agency
action
shall
compel
agency
action
unlawfully
withheld
unreasonably
delayed
hold
unlawful
set
aside
agency
action
findings
conclusions
found
arbitrary
capricious
abuse
discretion
otherwise
accordance
law
contrary
constitutional
right
power
privilege
immunity
excess
statutory
jurisdiction
authority
limitations
short
statutory
right
without
observance
procedure
required
law
unsupported
substantial
evidence
case
subject
requirements
sections
otherwise
reviewed
record
agency
hearing
provided
statute
unwarranted
facts
extent
facts
subject
trial
de
novo
reviewing
making
foregoing
determinations
shall
review
whole
record
portions
thereof
may
cited
party
due
account
shall
taken
rule
prejudicial
error
stat
italics
statement
attorney
general
appended
senate
report
explained
bill
intended
embody
law
declared
example
consolidated
edison
national
labor
relations
board
section
appendix
supra
reprinted
doc
supra
mcfarland
chairman
american
bar
association
committee
administrative
law
testified
house
judiciary
committee
effect
following
quotation
report
senate
judiciary
committee
indicates
position
sponsors
substantial
evidence
rule
set
forth
section
exceedingly
important
matter
language
substantial
evidence
seem
adequate
expression
law
difficulty
comes
practice
agencies
rely
upon
courts
tacitly
approve
something
less
rely
upon
suspicion
surmise
implications
plainly
incredible
evidence
duty
courts
determine
final
analysis
exercise
independent
judgment
whether
whole
record
evidence
given
instance
sufficiently
substantial
support
finding
conclusion
agency
action
matter
law
first
instance
however
function
agency
determine
sufficiency
evidence
upon
acts
proper
performance
public
duties
require
undertake
inquiry
careful
dispassionate
manner
objectives
bill
worded
fail
supplemental
legislation
required
supra
house
committee
report
substantially
effect
sess
reports
reprinted
doc
supra
see
also
response
senator
mccarran
debate
effect
bill
changed
rule
courts
powerless
interfere
probative
evidence
see
comment
congressman
springer
member
house
judiciary
committee
stat
supp
iii
et
seq
reprinted
legislative
history
labor
management
relations
act
history
evolution
senate
provision
given
senator
morse
cong
rec
reprinted
legislative
history
prints
approved
committee
sess
reprinted
legislative
history
committee
explain
ambiguity
might
noted
phrase
italicized
indistinguishable
content
requirement
administrative
procedure
act
shall
review
whole
record
portions
thereof
may
cited
party
senator
taft
gave
explanation
senate
meaning
section
first
place
evidence
must
substantial
second
place
must
still
look
substantial
viewed
light
entire
record
go
far
saying
decision
reversed
weight
evidence
go
quite
far
power
given
circuit
appeals
review
decision
goes
great
deal
present
law
gives
greater
opportunity
reverse
obviously
unjust
decision
part
national
labor
relations
board
cong
rec
reprinted
legislative
history
sess
reprinted
legislative
history
labor
board
nevada
consolidated
copper
reversed
judgment
refusing
enforce
board
order
upon
examination
record
say
findings
fact
board
without
support
evidence
sufficiency
evidence
support
findings
fact
involved
three
decisions
reference
made
labor
board
hearst
publications
republic
aviation
labor
board
labor
board
le
tourneau
language
used
offers
probable
explanation
including
two
decisions
courts
appeals
wilson
labor
board
appeals
seventh
circuit
sustained
finding
employer
dominated
company
union
stating
recognized
tried
findings
must
sustained
even
contrary
great
weight
evidence
ignored
least
endeavored
ignore
shocking
injustices
findings
opposed
overwhelming
weight
evidence
produce
labor
board
columbia
products
per
curiam
decision
appeals
second
circuit
sustaining
finding
discriminatory
discharge
said
board
decision
question
fact
though
may
strain
credulity
quite
break
must
accept
reason
disapproval
labor
board
union
pacific
stages
apparent
appeals
ninth
circuit
enforced
portion
board
order
directing
company
disavow
policy
discrimination
union
members
ground
appeared
evidence
although
disputed
company
officials
discouraged
employees
joining
bulk
lengthy
opinion
however
devoted
discussion
facts
support
conclusion
board
findings
discriminatory
discharges
sustained
labor
board
standard
oil
labor
board
columbia
products
see
notes
supra
rule
fed
rules
civ
gives
finality
findings
master
unless
clearly
erroneous
ruling
excluding
consideration
disagreement
board
examiner
apparent
conflict
views
three
circuits
labor
board
ohio
calcium
cir
staley
mfg
labor
board
cir
wilson
labor
board
cir
cf
international
assn
machinists
labor
board
app
final
report
proposed
bill
quoted
final
report
stat
quoted
provision
appear
bill
form
introduced
senate
added
senate
judiciary
committee
committee
published
reasons
modifying
earlier
draft
gave
explanation
particular
change
see
doc
supra
likely
sentence
intended
embody
clause
draft
prepared
attorney
general
committee
provided
review
case
decided
initially
examiner
agency
jurisdiction
remand
affirm
reverse
modify
set
aside
whole
part
decision
hearing
commissioner
make
finding
judgment
proper
upon
record
final
report
substance
recommendation
included
bills
introduced
house
quoted
doc
supra
salaries
trial
examiners
range
per
year
see
appendix
budget
government
fiscal
year
ending
june
supra
reproduced
doc
supra
sess
reprinted
doc
supra
house
report
added
broad
sense
agencies
reviewing
powers
compared
courts
section
bill
language
statute
offers
support
statement
sess
quoted
legislative
history
labor
management
relations
act