felker
turpin
warden
argued
june
decided
june
convicted
murder
crimes
sentenced
death
georgia
state
petitioner
denied
relief
direct
appeal
two
rounds
state
collateral
proceedings
first
round
federal
habeas
corpus
proceedings
awaiting
execution
president
signed
law
antiterrorism
effective
death
penalty
act
act
title
pertinent
requires
dismissal
claim
presented
state
prisoner
second
successive
federal
habeas
application
claim
also
presented
prior
application
section
compels
dismissal
claim
presented
prior
federal
application
unless
certain
conditions
apply
section
creates
gatekeeping
mechanism
whereby
prospective
applicant
files
appeals
motion
leave
file
second
successive
habeas
application
district
panel
determines
whether
application
makes
prima
facie
showing
satisfies
section
requirements
section
declares
panel
grant
denial
authorization
file
shall
appealable
shall
subject
petition
writ
certiorari
section
petitioner
filed
motion
leave
file
second
federal
habeas
petition
eleventh
circuit
denied
grounds
inter
alia
claims
raised
therein
presented
first
petition
meet
section
conditions
petitioner
filed
pleading
styled
petition
writ
habeas
corpus
appellate
certiorari
review
granted
certiorari
ordering
briefing
extent
title
provisions
apply
habeas
petition
filed
whether
application
act
suspended
habeas
case
whether
title
especially
section
unconstitutionally
restricts
jurisdiction
held
act
preclude
entertaining
application
habeas
corpus
relief
although
affect
standards
governing
granting
relief
pp
title
deprive
jurisdiction
entertain
habeas
petitions
filed
original
matters
pursuant
section
title
provision
mentions
authority
entertain
original
petitions
contrast
section
amends
federal
rules
appellate
procedure
bar
consideration
original
habeas
petitions
courts
appeals
although
section
precludes
reviewing
appeal
certiorari
latter
courts
decisions
exercising
gatekeeping
function
second
habeas
petitions
makes
mention
original
habeas
jurisdiction
thus
declines
find
repeal
section
implication
see
ex
parte
yerger
wall
conclusion
obviates
claim
petitioner
constitution
exceptions
clause
art
iii
section
provides
inter
alia
cases
shall
appellate
jurisdiction
law
fact
exceptions
congress
shall
make
since
act
repeal
authority
entertain
habeas
petition
plausible
argument
deprives
appellate
jurisdiction
violation
clause
pp
title
changes
standards
governing
consideration
habeas
petitions
imposing
new
requirements
section
limits
authority
grant
relief
state
prisoners
section
gatekeeping
system
apply
limited
applications
filed
district
limitation
however
restrictions
imposed
section
restrictions
inform
authority
grant
relief
original
habeas
petitions
whether
bound
restrictions
pp
act
violate
constitution
suspension
clause
art
section
cl
provides
privilege
writ
habeas
corpus
shall
suspended
new
restrictions
successive
habeas
petitions
constitute
modified
res
judicata
rule
restraint
called
habeas
practice
abuse
writ
doctrine
abuse
writ
refers
complex
evolving
body
equitable
principles
informed
controlled
historical
usage
statutory
developments
judicial
decisions
mccleskey
zant
new
restrictions
well
within
compass
evolutionary
process
amount
suspension
writ
pp
petition
original
writ
habeas
corpus
denied
petitioner
claims
satisfy
section
requirements
let
alone
rule
requires
habeas
petitioner
show
exceptional
circumstances
justifying
issuance
writ
says
habeas
relief
rarely
granted
petitioner
claims
materially
differ
numerous
claims
made
successive
habeas
petitioners
occasion
review
stay
applications
certiorari
dismissed
want
jurisdiction
writ
habeas
corpus
denied
rehnquist
delivered
opinion
unanimous
stevens
filed
concurring
opinion
souter
breyer
joined
souter
filed
concurring
opinion
stevens
breyer
joined
notice
opinion
subject
formal
revision
publication
preliminary
print
reports
readers
requested
notify
reporter
decisions
washington
typographical
formal
errors
order
corrections
may
made
preliminary
print
goes
press
end
syllabus
ellis
wayne
felker
petitioner
tony
turpin
warden
petitioner
paroled
four
years
later
november
met
joy
ludlam
cocktail
waitress
lounge
worked
interested
changing
jobs
petitioner
used
series
deceptions
involving
offering
job
leather
shoppe
business
owned
induce
visit
next
day
last
time
joy
seen
alive
evening
next
day
dead
body
discovered
two
weeks
later
creek
forensic
analysis
established
beaten
raped
sodomized
strangled
death
left
creek
investigators
discovered
hair
resembling
petitioner
joy
body
clothes
hair
resembling
joy
petitioner
bedroom
clothing
fibers
like
joy
coat
hatchback
petitioner
car
one
petitioner
neighbors
reported
seeing
joy
car
petitioner
house
day
disappeared
jury
convicted
petitioner
murder
rape
aggravated
sodomy
false
imprisonment
petitioner
sentenced
death
murder
charge
georgia
affirmed
petitioner
conviction
death
sentence
felker
state
denied
certiorari
state
trial
denied
collateral
relief
georgia
declined
issue
certificate
probable
cause
appeal
denial
denied
certiorari
felker
zant
petitioner
filed
petition
writ
habeas
corpus
district
middle
district
georgia
alleging
state
evidence
insufficient
convict
state
withheld
exculpatory
evidence
violation
brady
maryland
petitioner
counsel
rendered
ineffective
assistance
sentencing
state
improperly
used
hypnosis
refresh
witness
memory
state
violated
double
jeopardy
collateral
estoppel
principles
using
petitioner
crime
jane
evidence
petitioner
trial
crimes
joy
ludlam
district
denied
petition
appeals
eleventh
circuit
affirmed
extended
denial
petition
rehearing
denied
certiorari
state
scheduled
petitioner
execution
period
may
april
petitioner
filed
second
petition
state
collateral
relief
state
trial
denied
petition
may
georgia
denied
certiorari
may
april
president
signed
act
law
title
act
contained
series
amendments
existing
federal
habeas
corpus
law
provisions
act
pertinent
case
concern
second
successive
habeas
corpus
applications
state
prisoners
subsections
specify
conditions
claims
second
successive
applications
must
dismissed
amending
section
read
claim
presented
second
successive
habeas
corpus
application
section
presented
prior
application
shall
dismissed
claim
presented
second
successive
habeas
corpus
application
section
presented
prior
application
shall
dismissed
applicant
shows
claim
relies
new
rule
constitutional
law
made
retroactive
cases
collateral
review
previously
unavailable
factual
predicate
claim
discovered
previously
exercise
due
diligence
ii
facts
underlying
claim
proven
viewed
light
evidence
whole
sufficient
establish
clear
convincing
evidence
constitutional
error
reasonable
factfinder
found
applicant
guilty
underlying
offense
stat
appeals
denied
motions
day
filed
concluding
petitioner
claims
presented
first
habeas
petition
meet
standards
section
act
satisfied
standards
obtaining
review
merits
second
successive
claims
petitioner
filed
pleading
styled
petition
writ
habeas
corpus
appellate
certiorari
review
decision
circuit
eleventh
circuit
stay
execution
may
granted
petitioner
stay
application
petition
certiorari
ordered
briefing
extent
provisions
title
act
apply
petition
habeas
corpus
filed
whether
application
act
suspended
writ
habeas
corpus
case
whether
title
act
especially
section
constitutes
unconstitutional
restriction
jurisdiction
ii
yerger
holding
best
understood
light
availability
habeas
corpus
review
time
section
judiciary
act
authorized
federal
courts
including
grant
writ
habeas
corpus
prisoners
custody
colour
authority
committed
trial
act
ch
section
stat
congress
greatly
expanded
scope
federal
habeas
corpus
authorizing
federal
courts
grant
writ
addition
authority
already
conferred
law
cases
person
may
restrained
liberty
violation
constitution
treaty
law
act
ch
stat
act
instances
federal
issue
writ
produce
state
prisoner
prisoner
necessary
brought
testify
act
ch
section
stat
committed
act
done
pursuance
law
act
mar
ch
section
stat
subjec
citize
foreign
state
domiciled
therein
held
state
law
act
ch
stat
act
also
expanded
statutory
appellate
jurisdiction
authorize
appeals
final
decision
circuit
habeas
petition
stat
enactment
changed
result
barry
mercein
held
judiciary
act
authorize
conduct
appellate
review
circuit
habeas
decisions
however
congress
revoked
appellate
jurisdiction
given
repealing
much
act
authorizes
appeal
judgment
circuit
act
mar
ch
section
stat
yerger
considered
whether
act
deprived
us
power
hear
appeal
inferior
decision
habeas
petition
also
power
entertain
habeas
petition
section
act
concluded
act
affect
power
entertain
habeas
petitions
explained
act
text
addressed
jurisdiction
appeals
conferred
act
habeas
jurisdiction
conferred
acts
rejected
suggestion
act
repealed
habeas
power
implication
yerger
repeals
implication
favored
said
continued
exercise
original
habeas
jurisdiction
repugnant
prohibition
review
appeal
circuit
habeas
judgments
ibid
turning
present
case
conclude
title
act
repealed
authority
entertain
original
habeas
petitions
reasons
similar
stated
yerger
provision
title
mentions
authority
entertain
original
habeas
petitions
contrast
section
amends
federal
rules
appellate
procedure
bar
consideration
original
habeas
petitions
courts
appeals
although
section
precludes
us
reviewing
appeal
petition
certiorari
judgment
application
leave
file
second
habeas
petition
district
makes
mention
authority
hear
habeas
petitions
filed
original
matters
declined
find
repeal
section
judiciary
act
applied
implication
decline
find
similar
repeal
section
title
descendant
implication
conclusion
obviates
one
constitutional
challenges
raised
critical
language
article
iii
section
constitution
provides
apart
several
classes
cases
specifically
enumerated
original
jurisdiction
cases
shall
appellate
jurisdiction
law
fact
exceptions
regulations
congress
shall
make
previous
decisions
construing
clause
said
appellate
powers
given
constitution
limited
regulated
judiciary
act
acts
passed
subject
durousseau
cranch
see
also
cranch
act
remove
authority
entertain
appeal
petition
writ
certiorari
review
decision
appeals
exercising
gatekeeping
function
second
petition
since
repeal
authority
entertain
petition
habeas
corpus
plausible
argument
act
deprived
appellate
jurisdiction
violation
article
iii
section
section
act
addresses
second
successive
habeas
petitions
section
gatekeeping
system
second
petitions
apply
consideration
habeas
petitions
applies
applications
filed
district
section
limitation
however
restrictions
repetitive
new
claims
imposed
subsections
restrictions
apply
without
qualification
second
successive
habeas
corpus
application
section
section
whether
bound
restrictions
certainly
inform
consideration
original
habeas
petitions
iii
congress
made
writ
generally
available
cases
person
may
restrained
liberty
violation
constitution
treaty
law
supra
well
century
interpreted
provision
allow
final
judgment
conviction
state
collaterally
attacked
habeas
see
waley
johnston
brown
allen
assume
purposes
decision
suspension
clause
constitution
refers
writ
exists
today
rather
existed
see
swain
pressley
burger
concurring
act
requires
habeas
petitioner
obtain
leave
appeals
filing
second
habeas
petition
district
requirement
simply
transfers
district
appeals
screening
function
previously
performed
district
required
section
rule
act
also
codifies
limits
successive
petitions
restricts
availability
relief
habeas
petitioners
long
recognized
power
award
writ
courts
must
given
written
law
ex
parte
bollman
cranch
likewise
recognized
judgments
proper
scope
writ
normally
congress
make
lonchar
thomas
slip
new
restrictions
successive
petitions
constitute
modified
res
judicata
rule
restraint
called
habeas
corpus
practice
abuse
writ
mccleskey
zant
said
doctrine
abuse
writ
refers
complex
evolving
body
equitable
principles
informed
controlled
historical
usage
statutory
developments
judicial
decisions
added
restrictions
act
places
second
habeas
petitions
well
within
compass
evolutionary
process
hold
amount
suspension
writ
contrary
article
section
iv
petition
seeking
issuance
writ
habeas
corpus
shall
comply
requirements
section
particular
provision
last
paragraph
section
requiring
statement
reasons
making
application
district
district
applicant
held
relief
sought
judgment
state
petition
shall
set
forth
specifically
wherein
petitioner
exhausted
available
remedies
state
courts
otherwise
comes
within
provisions
section
justify
granting
writ
habeas
corpus
petitioner
must
show
exceptional
circumstances
warranting
exercise
discretionary
powers
must
show
adequate
relief
obtained
form
writs
rarely
granted
petition
writ
certiorari
dismissed
want
jurisdiction
petition
original
writ
habeas
corpus
denied
ordered
justice
stevens
justice
souter
justice
breyer
join
concurring
join
opinion
believe
response
argument
act
deprived
appellate
jurisdiction
violation
article
iii
section
incomplete
therefore
add
brief
comment
correctly
concludes
act
divest
jurisdiction
grant
petitioner
relief
issuing
writ
habeas
corpus
however
except
category
orders
entered
courts
appeals
pursuant
section
statutory
jurisdiction
review
cases
courts
appeals
pursuant
section
act
purport
limit
jurisdiction
section
review
interlocutory
orders
cases
limit
jurisdiction
section
limit
jurisdiction
writs
act
section
accordingly
least
three
reasons
rejecting
petitioner
argument
limited
exception
violates
article
iii
section
first
retain
jurisdiction
review
gatekeeping
orders
pursuant
writs
petitioner
suggested
orders
immune
direct
review
second
entering
appropriate
interlocutory
order
appeals
may
provide
opportunity
review
proposed
disposition
motion
leave
file
second
successive
habeas
application
third
exercise
habeas
corpus
jurisdiction
may
consider
earlier
gatekeeping
orders
entered
appeals
inform
judgments
provide
parties
functional
equivalent
direct
review
case
correctly
denies
writ
habeas
corpus
petitioner
claims
satisfy
requirements
jurisprudence
requirements
act
including
standards
governing
appeals
gatekeeping
function
justice
souter
justice
stevens
justice
breyer
join
concurring
join
opinion
holds
today
antiterrorism
effective
death
penalty
act
pub
stat
precludes
review
certiorari
appeal
courts
appeals
gatekeeper
determinations
see
provision
codified
section
statute
text
necessarily
foreclose
appellate
jurisdiction
see
section
certified
questions
courts
appeals
section
authority
issue
appropriate
writs
aid
another
exercise
appellate
jurisdiction
rule
procedure
petitions
extraordinary
writs
congress
repealed
authority
entertain
original
petitions
writs
habeas
corpus
petitioner
sought
writ
certiorari
congress
foreclosed
writ
habeas
corpus
even
applying
traditional
criteria
choose
deny
see
ante
difficulty
conclusion
statute
face
applied
unconstitutional
write
add
later
turn
statutory
avenues
certiorari
reviewing
gatekeeping
determination
closed
question
whether
statute
exceeded
congress
exceptions
clause
power
open
question
arise
courts
appeals
adopted
divergent
interpretations
gatekeeper
standard
footnotes
section
direct
ancestor
section
subsection
pertinent
part
writs
habeas
corpus
may
granted
justice
thereof
district
courts
circuit
judge
within
respective
jurisdictions
language
act
direct
ancestor
extend
prisoner
unless
custody
violation
constitution
laws
treaties
section
act
amends
federal
rule
appellate
procedure
read
application
writ
habeas
corpus
shall
made
appropriate
district
application
made
circuit
judge
application
shall
transferred
appropriate
district
application
made
transferred
district
denied
renewal
application
circuit
judge
shall
permitted
applicant
may
pursuant
section
title
code
appeal
appropriate
appeals
order
district
denying
writ
originally
enacted
section
specified
application
writ
habeas
corpus
behalf
person
custody
pursuant
judgment
state
shall
granted
unless
appears
applicant
exhausted
remedies
available
courts
state
section
supp
iii
reviser
notes
citing
ex
parte
hawk
indicated
new
section
declaratory
existing
law
affirmed
reviser
note
following
section
supp
iii
hawk
one
series
opinions
applied
exhaustion
requirement
first
announced
ex
parte
royall
deny
relief
applicants
seeking
writs
habeas
corpus
petition
commonly
understood
original
sense
filed
first
instance
nonetheless
constitutional
purposes
exercise
appellate
rather
original
jurisdiction
see
oaks
original
writ
habeas
corpus
rev
see
hart
power
congress
limit
jurisdiction
federal
courts
exercise
dialectic
harv
rev
articulating
essential
functions
limitation
exceptions
clause
ratner
congressional
power
appellate
jurisdiction
rev
gunther
congressional
power
curtail
federal
jurisdiction
opinionated
guide
ongoing
debate
stan
rev
taking
broad
view
congress
authority
noting
ongoing
scholarly
debate
caminker
must
inferior
courts
obey
superior
precedents
stan
rev
noting
essential
functions
argument
may
find
textual
support
respect
lower
federal
courts
requirement
art
section
cl
courts
inferior