ohio
robinette
argued
october
decided
november
ohio
deputy
sheriff
stopped
respondent
robinette
speeding
gave
verbal
warning
returned
driver
license
deputy
asked
whether
carrying
illegal
contraband
weapons
drugs
car
robinette
answered
consented
search
car
revealed
small
amount
marijuana
pill
arrested
later
charged
knowing
possession
controlled
substance
pill
turned
amine
following
denial
pretrial
suppression
motion
found
guilty
ohio
appeals
reversed
ground
search
resulted
unlawful
detention
state
affirmed
establishing
prerequisite
consensual
interrogation
circumstances
requirement
officer
clearly
state
citizen
validly
detained
traffic
offense
legally
free
go
held
jurisdiction
review
ohio
decision
contention
jurisdiction
lacking
ohio
decision
rested
part
upon
state
constitution
rejected
michigan
long
although
opinion
mentions
ohio
constitution
passing
clearly
relies
federal
law
discussing
citing
federal
cases
almost
exclusively
dispositive
citations
appear
opinion
official
syllabus
zacchini
broadcasting
permissible
turn
ohio
opinion
body
syllabus
speaks
general
terms
federal
ohio
constitutions
jurisdiction
defeated
additional
holding
continuing
detention
person
stopped
traffic
violation
constitutes
illegal
seizure
officer
motivation
continuing
related
purpose
original
constitutional
stop
articulable
facts
giving
rise
suspicion
separate
illegal
activity
whren
officer
subjective
intentions
make
continued
detention
illegal
long
detention
justified
circumstances
viewed
objectively
pp
fourth
amendment
require
lawfully
seized
defendant
advised
free
go
consent
search
recognized
voluntary
amendment
touchstone
reasonableness
measured
objective
terms
examining
totality
circumstances
applying
test
consistently
eschewed
rules
instead
emphasizing
nature
reasonableness
inquiry
indeed
rejecting
per
se
rule
similar
one
adopted
held
voluntariness
consent
search
question
fact
determined
circumstances
schneckloth
bustamonte
ohio
erred
holding
otherwise
unrealistic
require
police
always
inform
detainees
free
go
consent
search
may
deemed
voluntary
cf
pp
ohio
reversed
rehnquist
delivered
opinion
scalia
kennedy
souter
thomas
breyer
joined
ginsburg
filed
opinion
concurring
judgment
stevens
filed
dissenting
opinion
notice
opinion
subject
formal
revision
publication
preliminary
print
reports
readers
requested
notify
reporter
decisions
typographical
formal
errors
order
corrections
may
made
preliminary
print
goes
press
end
syllabus
ohio
petitioner
robert
robinette
case
arose
stretch
interstate
north
dayton
ohio
posted
speed
limit
miles
per
hour
construction
respondent
robert
robinette
clocked
miles
per
hour
drove
car
along
stretch
road
stopped
deputy
roger
newsome
montgomery
county
sheriff
office
newsome
asked
handed
robinette
driver
license
ran
computer
check
indicated
robinette
previous
violations
newsome
asked
robinette
step
car
turned
mounted
video
camera
issued
verbal
warning
robinette
returned
license
point
newsome
asked
one
question
get
gone
carrying
illegal
contraband
car
weapons
kind
drugs
anything
like
app
brief
respondent
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
robinette
answered
questions
deputy
newsome
asked
search
car
robinette
consented
car
deputy
newsome
discovered
small
amount
marijuana
film
container
pill
later
determined
methylenedioxymethamphetamine
mdma
robinette
arrested
charged
knowing
possession
controlled
substance
mdma
violation
ohio
rev
code
ann
section
trial
robinette
unsuccessfully
sought
suppress
evidence
pleaded
contest
found
guilty
appeal
ohio
appeals
reversed
ruling
search
resulted
unlawful
detention
ohio
divided
vote
affirmed
ohio
opinion
established
prerequisite
consensual
interrogation
circumstances
right
guaranteed
federal
ohio
constitutions
secure
one
person
property
requires
citizens
stopped
traffic
offenses
clearly
informed
detaining
officer
free
go
valid
detention
officer
attempts
engage
consensual
interrogation
attempt
consensual
interrogation
must
preceded
phrase
time
legally
free
go
words
similar
import
must
first
consider
whether
jurisdiction
review
ohio
decision
respondent
contends
lack
jurisdiction
ohio
decision
rested
upon
ohio
constitution
addition
federal
constitution
michigan
long
state
decision
fairly
appears
rest
primarily
federal
law
interwoven
federal
law
adequacy
independence
possible
state
law
ground
clear
face
opinion
accept
reasonable
explanation
state
decided
case
way
believed
federal
law
required
although
opinion
mentions
article
section
ohio
constitution
passing
section
reads
identically
fourth
amendment
opinion
clearly
relies
federal
law
nevertheless
indeed
cases
discusses
even
cites
federal
cases
except
one
state
case
applies
federal
constitution
jurisdiction
defeated
fact
citations
appear
body
opinion
ohio
law
speaks
syllabi
cases
see
ohio
gallagher
syllabus
speaks
general
terms
federal
ohio
constitutions
permissible
us
turn
body
opinion
discern
grounds
decision
zacchini
broadcasting
respondent
robinette
also
contends
may
reach
question
presented
petition
ohio
also
held
set
syllabus
motivation
behind
police
officer
continued
detention
person
stopped
traffic
violation
related
purpose
original
constitutional
stop
continued
detention
based
articulable
facts
giving
rise
suspicion
separate
illegal
activity
justifying
extension
detention
continued
detention
constitutes
illegal
seizure
ohio
respondent
failed
make
argument
brief
opposition
certiorari
see
rule
believe
issue
continuing
legality
detention
predicate
intelligent
resolution
question
presented
therefore
fairly
included
therein
rule
vance
terrazas
parties
briefed
issue
proceed
decide
think
recent
decision
whren
decided
ohio
decided
present
case
subjective
intentions
officer
make
continued
detention
respondent
illegal
fourth
amendment
made
clear
whren
fact
officer
state
mind
hypothecated
reasons
provide
legal
justification
officer
action
invalidate
action
taken
long
circumstances
viewed
objectively
justify
action
subjective
intentions
play
role
ordinary
fourth
amendment
analysis
slip
op
quoting
scott
question
light
admitted
probable
cause
stop
robinette
speeding
deputy
newsome
objectively
justified
asking
robinette
get
car
subjective
thoughts
notwithstanding
see
pennsylvania
mimms
hold
motor
vehicle
lawfully
detained
traffic
violation
police
officers
may
order
driver
get
vehicle
without
violating
fourth
amendment
proscription
unreasonable
searches
seizures
turn
merits
question
presented
long
held
touchstone
fourth
amendment
reasonableness
florida
jimeno
reasonableness
turn
measured
objective
terms
examining
totality
circumstances
applying
test
consistently
eschewed
rules
instead
emphasizing
nature
reasonableness
inquiry
thus
florida
royer
expressly
disavowed
test
single
sentence
paragraph
rule
recognition
endless
variations
facts
circumstances
implicating
fourth
amendment
michigan
chesternut
parties
urged
rule
applicable
investigatory
pursuits
rejected
proposed
rules
contrary
traditional
contextual
approach
florida
bostick
florida
adopted
per
se
rule
questioning
aboard
bus
always
constitutes
seizure
reversed
reiterating
proper
inquiry
necessitates
consideration
circumstances
surrounding
encounter
previously
rejected
per
se
rule
similar
adopted
ohio
determining
validity
consent
search
schneckloth
bustamonte
argued
consent
valid
unless
defendant
knew
right
refuse
request
rejected
argument
knowledge
right
refuse
consent
one
factor
taken
account
government
need
establish
knowledge
sine
qua
non
effective
consent
thoroughly
impractical
impose
normal
consent
search
detailed
requirements
effective
warning
unrealistic
require
police
officers
always
inform
detainees
free
go
consent
search
may
deemed
voluntary
fourth
amendment
test
valid
consent
search
consent
voluntary
oluntariness
question
fact
determined
circumstances
ohio
held
otherwise
judgment
reversed
case
remanded
proceedings
inconsistent
opinion
ordered
justice
ginsburg
concurring
judgment
robert
robinette
traffic
stop
speeding
violation
interstate
highway
ohio
served
prelude
search
automobile
illegal
drugs
robinette
experience
uncommon
ohio
ohio
related
sheriff
deputy
detained
robinette
speeding
asked
robinette
permission
search
vehicle
drug
interdiction
patrol
time
ohio
deputy
testified
robinette
case
routinely
requested
permission
search
automobiles
stopped
traffic
violations
ibid
according
deputy
testimony
another
prosecution
requested
consent
search
traffic
stops
year
robinette
arrest
state
retherford
ohio
app
dism
ohio
unique
vantage
point
ohio
courts
observed
traffic
stops
state
regularly
giving
way
contraband
searches
characterized
consensual
even
officers
reason
suspect
illegal
activity
one
ohio
appellate
noted
undreds
perhaps
thousands
ohio
citizens
routinely
delayed
travels
asked
relinquish
uniformed
police
officers
right
privacy
automobiles
luggage
sometimes
better
reason
provide
officer
opportunity
practice
drug
interdiction
technique
ohio
app
omitted
background
ohio
determined
announced
robinette
case
federal
state
constitutional
rights
ohio
citizens
secure
persons
property
called
protection
instruction
state
police
officers
officer
wishing
engage
consensual
interrogation
motorist
conclusion
traffic
stop
must
first
tell
motorist
free
go
ohio
described
need
rule
way
transition
detention
consensual
exchange
seamless
untrained
eye
may
notice
occurred
people
believe
validly
police
officer
custody
long
officer
continues
interrogate
police
officer
retains
upper
hand
accouterments
authority
officer
lacks
legal
license
continue
detain
unknown
citizens
reasonable
person
feel
free
walk
away
officer
continues
address
legality
consensual
encounters
police
citizens
preserved
believe
legality
used
police
officers
turn
routine
traffic
stop
fishing
expedition
unrelated
criminal
activity
fourth
amendment
federal
constitution
section
article
ohio
constitution
exist
protect
citizens
unreasonable
interference
liberty
ohio
write
separately
however
seems
improbable
ohio
understood
rule
federal
constitution
mandate
nation
whole
state
free
matter
law
impose
greater
restrictions
police
activity
holds
necessary
upon
federal
constitutional
standards
oregon
hass
ordinarily
state
high
grounds
rule
criminal
procedure
federal
constitution
thereby
signals
view
nation
constitution
require
rule
given
decisions
cases
schneckloth
bustamonte
florida
bostick
however
suspect
ohio
may
homed
implication
ordinarily
drawn
state
reliance
federal
constitution
words
question
whether
ohio
thought
strict
rule
announced
rule
governance
police
conduct
miami
county
ohio
also
miami
florida
rule
seems
prophylactic
measure
much
extracted
text
constitutional
provision
crafted
ohio
reduce
number
violations
textually
guaranteed
rights
miranda
arizona
announced
similarly
motivated
rule
minimal
national
requirement
without
suggesting
text
federal
constitution
required
precise
measures
opinion
set
forth
see
constitution
necessarily
requir
adherence
particular
solution
problems
associated
custodial
interrogations
see
also
oregon
elstad
miranda
exclusionary
rule
sweeps
broadly
fifth
amendment
although
parts
fall
within
domain
ohio
similarly
situated
declare
prophylactic
rules
governing
conduct
officials
ohio
command
police
forces
sister
ease
today
disposes
federal
leg
ohio
decision
strengthens
impression
ohio
saw
rule
measure
made
ohio
designed
reinforce
state
right
people
secure
unreasonable
searches
seizures
ohio
syllabus
opinion
however
ambiguous
long
existence
ambiguity
regarding
federalor
basis
state
decision
trigger
jurisdiction
long
governs
even
things
considered
plausible
reading
state
decision
may
state
regard
federal
constitution
alone
sufficient
basis
ruling
compare
arizona
evans
slip
slip
ginsburg
dissenting
incumbent
state
therefore
determines
state
laws
call
protection
complete
federal
constitution
demands
clear
ultimate
reliance
state
law
similarly
state
announcing
new
legal
rule
arguably
derived
federal
state
law
definitively
render
state
law
adequate
independent
ground
decision
simple
declaration
effect
recent
montana
opinion
scope
individual
privilege
includes
declaration
devoted
considerable
time
lengthy
discussion
application
fifth
amendment
constitution
noted
holding
also
based
separately
independently
defendant
right
remain
silent
pursuant
article
ii
section
montana
constitution
state
fuller
mont
cert
denied
remand
ohio
may
choose
clarify
instructions
officers
ohio
find
adequate
independent
support
state
law
issuing
instructions
endeavored
state
dispositively
law
applicable
ohio
see
evans
slip
ginsburg
dissenting
avoid
misunderstanding
ohio
must
speak
clarity
sought
require
state
police
officers
efficacy
endeavor
safeguard
liberties
ohioans
without
disarming
state
police
tested
precise
way
federalism
designed
work
see
kaye
state
courts
dawn
new
century
common
law
courts
reading
statutes
constitutions
rev
linde
first
things
first
rediscovering
bills
rights
balt
rev
justice
stevens
dissenting
holding
today
narrow
federal
constitution
require
lawfully
seized
person
advised
free
go
consent
search
recognized
voluntary
agree
holding
given
reading
opinion
ohio
also
agree
appropriate
limit
review
answering
sole
question
presented
state
certiorari
petition
read
state
opinion
however
prophylactic
rule
announced
second
syllabus
intended
guide
decision
future
cases
rather
explanation
decision
case
therefore
affirm
judgment
ohio
correctly
held
respondent
consent
search
vehicle
product
unlawful
detention
moreover
important
emphasize
nothing
federal
state
requiring
law
enforcement
officers
give
detained
motorists
advice
mandated
ohio
facts
give
rise
two
questions
law
whether
respondent
still
detained
one
question
asked
whether
detention
unlawful
opinion
ohio
appellate
ohio
correctly
answered
questions
ohio
correctly
relied
upon
mendenhall
stated
person
seized
within
meaning
fourth
amendment
view
circumstances
surrounding
incident
reasonable
person
believed
free
leave
opinion
stewart
see
michigan
chesternut
noting
since
embraced
test
see
also
florida
bostick
applying
variant
approach
ohio
appeals
applied
similar
analysis
see
app
pet
cert
several
circumstances
support
ohio
courts
conclusion
reasonable
motorist
respondent
shoes
believed
obligation
answer
one
question
simply
walk
away
officer
get
back
car
drive
away
question
sought
answer
get
gone
addition
facts
respondent
detained
received
advice
free
leave
standing
front
television
camera
response
official
command
inconsistent
assumption
reasonably
believe
duty
respond
ohio
surely
correct
stating
people
believe
validly
police
officer
custody
long
officer
continues
interrogate
police
officer
retains
upper
hand
accouterments
authority
officer
lacks
legal
license
continue
detain
unknown
citizens
reasonable
person
feel
free
walk
away
officer
continues
address
ohio
moreover
objective
matter
fair
presume
drivers
stopped
speeding
hurry
get
destinations
drivers
interest
prolonging
delay
occasioned
stop
engage
idle
conversation
officer
much
less
allow
potentially
lengthy
search
also
assume
carrying
interest
preserving
privacy
vehicles
possessions
prying
eyes
curious
stranger
fact
particular
officer
successfully
used
similar
method
obtaining
consent
search
roughly
times
one
year
state
retherford
ohio
app
dism
ohio
indicates
motorists
generally
respond
manner
contrary
repeated
decisions
ordinary
citizens
surrender
interest
satisfactorily
explained
hypothesis
assumption
believed
legal
duty
ohio
therefore
entirely
correct
presume
first
syllabus
preceding
opinion
continued
detention
issue
ohio
ohio
appeals
reached
similar
conclusion
response
state
contention
robinette
free
go
time
consent
sought
reviewing
reasonable
person
robinette
position
believe
investigative
stop
concluded
free
go
long
police
officer
continuing
ask
investigative
questions
app
pet
cert
read
ohio
opinions
determinations
independent
rule
criticized
majority
see
reason
disturb
first
syllabus
ohio
also
answered
question
whether
officer
continued
detention
respondent
lawful
unlawful
see
ante
although
possible
ambiguity
use
word
motivation
ohio
explanation
traffic
officer
continued
detention
respondent
illegal
seizure
first
syllabus
otherwise
correct
statement
relevant
federal
rule
well
relevant
ohio
rule
points
opinion
matter
federal
law
subjective
motivation
officer
determine
legality
detention
assume
learned
judges
sitting
ohio
well
aware
proposition
construe
syllabus
generously
replacing
ambiguous
term
motivation
behind
term
justification
order
make
syllabus
unambiguously
state
correct
rule
federal
law
amended
controlling
proposition
federal
law
reads
justification
police
officer
continued
detention
person
stopped
traffic
violation
related
purpose
original
constitutional
stop
continued
detention
based
articulable
facts
giving
rise
suspicion
separate
illegal
activity
justifying
extension
detention
continued
detention
constitutes
illegal
seizure
ohio
time
prior
search
respondent
vehicle
articulable
facts
give
rise
reasonable
suspicion
separate
illegal
activity
justify
detention
see
sharpe
terry
ohio
objective
matter
inexorably
follows
officer
completed
task
either
arresting
reprimanding
driver
speeding
car
continued
detention
person
constituted
illegal
seizure
holding
ohio
entirely
consistent
federal
law
proper
disposition
follows
application
law
held
florida
royer
consent
obtained
illegal
detention
ordinarily
ineffective
justify
otherwise
invalid
search
see
also
florida
bostick
noting
consent
given
course
unlawful
seizure
results
search
must
suppressed
tainted
fruit
dunaway
new
york
brown
illinois
cf
wong
sun
robinette
consent
search
product
unlawful
detention
consent
tainted
illegality
ineffective
justify
search
royer
plurality
opinion
therefore
affirm
judgment
ii
rule
federal
law
precludes
ohio
requiring
police
officers
give
citizens
warnings
help
understand
whether
valid
traffic
stop
come
end
help
judges
decide
whether
reasonable
person
felt
free
leave
circumstances
issue
given
case
previously
observed
anything
federal
constitution
prohibits
state
giving
lawmaking
power
courts
minnesota
clover
leaf
creamery
dissenting
opinion
thus
far
concerned
whether
ohio
acts
one
branch
government
another
power
enforce
warning
rule
may
adopt
rules
executive
action
moreover
recognize
warning
rules
provide
benefits
law
enforcement
profession
courts
well
public
agree
function
pass
judgment
wisdom
rules
accordingly
concluded
judgment
ohio
affirmed
thus
dissent
disposition
case
full
accord
conclusion
federal
constitution
neither
mandates
prohibits
warnings
prescribed
ohio
whether
practice
followed
ohio
matter
ohio
lawmakers
decide
footnotes
respondent
amici
ask
us
take
opportunity
depart
michigan
long
persuaded
argument
two
terms
ago
see
arizona
evans
reaffirm
long
presumption
formerly
ohio
reluctant
use
ohio
constitution
extend
greater
protection
rights
civil
liberties
ohio
citizens
usually
taken
advantage
opportunities
us
ohio
constitution
independent
source
constitutional
rights
arnold
cleveland
ohio
recently
however
state
high
declared
ohio
constitution
document
independent
force
long
state
courts
provide
least
much
protection
provided
interpretation
federal
bill
rights
state
courts
unrestricted
according
greater
civil
liberties
protections
individuals
groups
syllabus
whether
fourth
amendment
constitution
requires
police
officers
inform
motorists
lawfully
stopped
traffic
violations
legal
detention
concluded
subsequent
interrogation
search
found
consensual
pet
cert
part
crucial
portions
exchange
videotaped
recording
part
record
see
ohio
learned
commentator
expressed
agreement
point
see
lafave
search
seizure
section
ed
supp
given
fact
defendant
quite
clearly
seized
car
pulled
return
credentials
hardly
manifests
change
status
immediately
followed
interrogation
concerning
criminal
activity
see
also
ibid
approving
ohio
analysis
case
indicated
much
past
see
berkemer
mccarty
certainly
motorists
feel
free
either
disobey
directive
pull
leave
scene
traffic
stop
without
told
might
though
search
appear
particularly
intrusive
may
always
see
brief
american
civil
liberties
union
et
al
amici
curiae
indeed
holding
florida
jimeno
allowing
police
open
closed
containers
context
automobile
consent
search
consent
reasonably
understood
extend
particular
container
ensures
many
motorists
wind
consenting
far
broader
search
might
imagined
see
objection
police
rule
requiring
police
seek
consent
search
containers
well
automobile
prevent
exploiting
ignorance
citizen
simply
anticipate
consent
search
car
understood
authorize
police
rummage
packages
marshall
dissenting
ordinarily
syllabus
precedes
ohio
opinion
rather
opinion
law
case
cassidy
glossip
ohio
see
migra
warren
city
school
dist
bd
ohio
gallagher
indeed
first
paragraph
ohio
opinion
clearly
indicates
rule
meant
apply
future
cases
ohio
first
explained
find
search
invalid
since
product
unlawful
seizure
ohio
st
proceed
point
also
use
case
establish
test
ibid
cf
florida
royer
plurality
opinion
investigative
detention
must
temporary
last
longer
necessary
effectuate
purpose
stop
stop
inquiry
must
reasonably
related
scope
justification
initiation
quoting
terry
ohio
since
reviews
judgments
opinions
chevron
natural
resources
defense
council
ohio
holding
robinette
continued
seizure
illegal
grounds
provides
sufficient
basis
affirming
judgment
writing
plurality
justice
white
explained
statements
given
period
illegal
detention
inadmissible
even
though
voluntarily
given
product
illegal
detention
result
independent
act
free
defendant
royer
illegally
detained
consented
search
result
plurality
agreed
consent
tainted
illegality
ineffective
justify
search
concurring
result
justice
brennan
agreed
much
plurality
decision
diverging
grounds
see
justice
brennan
agreement
narrow
principle
represents
holding
see
marks
indeed
indicated
florida
bostick
fact
defendant
explicitly
advised
refuse
give
consent
relevant
question
whether
seized
time
consent
sought
cases
stressed
importance
similar
advice
circumstance
supporting
conclusion
consent
search
voluntary
see
schneckloth
bustamonte
mendenhall
cf
washington
chrisman
consent
search
voluntary
defendant
consented
writing
advised
consent
must
voluntary
absolute
right
refuse
consent
informed
brief
amicus
curiae
filed
americans
effective
law
enforcement
warning
may
good
police
practice
indeed
amicus
knows
many
law
enforcement
agencies
among
constituents
routinely
incorporated
warning
fourth
amendment
consent
forms
use
field
precisely
practice
constitutional
imperative
officer
includes
warning
request
consent
undoubtedly
presents
stronger
case
finding
voluntariness
suppression
hearing
suggest
agencies
officers
otherwise
know
instructors
many
police
training
programs
leading
universities
management
institutes
routinely
recommend
warnings
sound
practice
likely
bolster
voluntariness
consent
search
conduct
law
enforcement
training
programs
national
level
many
speakers
made
point
brief
americans
effective
law
enforcement
amicus
curiae