parklane
hosiery
shore
argued
october
decided
january
respondent
brought
stockholder
class
action
district
damages
relief
petitioners
corporation
officers
directors
stockholders
allegedly
issued
materially
false
misleading
proxy
statement
violation
federal
securities
laws
securities
exchange
commission
sec
regulations
action
came
trial
sec
sued
defendants
district
alleging
proxy
statement
materially
false
misleading
essentially
respects
respondent
claimed
district
nonjury
trial
entered
declaratory
judgment
sec
appeals
affirmed
respondent
case
moved
partial
summary
judgment
petitioners
asserting
collaterally
estopped
relitigating
issues
resolved
sec
suit
district
denied
motion
ground
application
collateral
estoppel
deny
petitioners
seventh
amendment
right
jury
trial
appeals
reversed
held
petitioners
full
fair
opportunity
litigate
claims
sec
action
collaterally
estopped
relitigating
question
whether
proxy
statement
materially
false
misleading
pp
mutuality
doctrine
neither
party
use
prior
judgment
unless
parties
bound
judgment
longer
applies
see
laboratories
university
illinois
foundation
pp
offensive
use
collateral
estoppel
plaintiff
seeks
foreclose
defendant
litigating
issue
defendant
previously
litigated
unsuccessfully
action
another
party
promote
judicial
economy
manner
promoted
defensive
use
defendant
seeks
prevent
plaintiff
asserting
claim
plaintiff
previously
litigated
lost
another
defendant
offensive
use
may
also
unfair
defendant
various
ways
therefore
general
rule
cases
plaintiff
easily
joined
earlier
action
application
offensive
estoppel
unfair
defendant
trial
judge
exercise
discretion
allow
use
offensive
collateral
estoppel
pp
case
however
application
offensive
collateral
estoppel
reward
private
plaintiff
joined
previous
action
since
respondent
probably
joined
injunctive
action
brought
sec
unfairness
petitioners
application
since
petitioners
every
incentive
fully
vigorously
litigate
sec
suit
judgment
sec
action
inconsistent
prior
decision
respondent
action
procedural
opportunities
available
petitioners
unavailable
sec
action
kind
might
likely
cause
different
result
pp
use
collateral
estoppel
case
violate
petitioners
seventh
amendment
right
jury
trial
pp
equitable
determination
effect
subsequent
legal
action
without
violating
seventh
amendment
katchen
landy
pp
petitioners
contention
since
scope
seventh
amendment
must
determined
reference
common
law
existed
time
collateral
estoppel
permitted
mutuality
parties
without
merit
many
procedural
devices
developed
since
diminished
civil
jury
historic
domain
found
violate
seventh
amendment
see
galloway
pp
stewart
delivered
opinion
burger
brennan
white
marshall
blackmun
powell
stevens
joined
rehnquist
filed
dissenting
opinion
post
jack
levitt
argued
cause
petitioners
briefs
irving
parker
joseph
salomon
robert
cooperman
samuel
rosen
argued
cause
filed
brief
respondent
solicitor
general
mccree
deputy
solicitor
general
easterbrook
stephen
shapiro
harvey
pitt
paul
gonson
michael
wolensky
filed
brief
et
al
amici
curiae
urging
affirmance
joel
joseph
filed
brief
washington
legal
foundation
amicus
curiae
justice
stewart
delivered
opinion
case
presents
question
whether
party
issues
fact
adjudicated
adversely
equitable
action
may
collaterally
estopped
relitigating
issues
jury
subsequent
legal
action
brought
new
party
respondent
brought
stockholder
class
action
petitioners
federal
district
complaint
alleged
petitioners
parklane
hosiery
parklane
officers
directors
stockholders
issued
materially
false
misleading
proxy
statement
connection
merger
proxy
statement
according
complaint
violated
securities
exchange
act
stat
amended
well
various
rules
regulations
promulgated
securities
exchange
commission
sec
complaint
sought
damages
rescission
merger
recovery
costs
action
came
trial
sec
filed
suit
defendants
federal
district
alleging
proxy
statement
issued
parklane
materially
false
misleading
essentially
respects
ben
alleged
respondent
complaint
injunctive
relief
requested
trial
district
found
proxy
statement
materially
false
misleading
respects
alleged
entered
declaratory
judgment
effect
sec
parklane
hosiery
supp
appeals
second
circuit
affirmed
judgment
respondent
present
case
moved
partial
summary
judgment
petitioners
asserting
petitioners
collaterally
estopped
relitigating
issues
resolved
action
brought
sec
district
denied
motion
ground
application
collateral
estoppel
deny
petitioners
seventh
amendment
right
jury
trial
appeals
second
circuit
reversed
holding
party
issues
fact
determined
full
fair
opportunity
litigate
nonjury
trial
collaterally
estopped
obtaining
subsequent
jury
trial
issues
fact
appellate
concluded
seventh
amendment
preserves
right
jury
trial
respect
issues
fact
issues
fully
fairly
adjudicated
prior
proceeding
nothing
remains
trial
either
without
jury
intercircuit
conflict
granted
certiorari
threshold
question
considered
whether
quite
apart
right
jury
trial
seventh
amendment
petitioners
precluded
relitigating
facts
resolved
adversely
prior
equitable
proceeding
another
party
general
law
collateral
estoppel
specifically
must
determine
whether
litigant
party
prior
judgment
may
nevertheless
use
judgment
offensively
prevent
defendant
relitigating
issues
resolved
earlier
proceeding
collateral
estoppel
like
related
doctrine
res
judicata
dual
purpose
protecting
litigants
burden
relitigating
identical
issue
party
privy
promoting
judicial
economy
preventing
needless
litigation
laboratories
university
illinois
foundation
relatively
recently
however
scope
collateral
estoppel
limited
doctrine
mutuality
parties
mutuality
doctrine
neither
party
use
prior
judgment
estoppel
unless
parties
bound
judgment
based
premise
somehow
unfair
allow
party
use
prior
judgment
bound
mutuality
requirement
provided
party
litigated
lost
previous
action
opportunity
relitigate
identical
issues
new
parties
failing
recognize
obvious
difference
position
party
never
litigated
issue
one
fully
litigated
lost
mutuality
requirement
criticized
almost
inception
recognizing
validity
criticism
laboratories
university
illinois
foundation
supra
abandoned
mutuality
requirement
least
cases
patentee
seeks
relitigate
validity
patent
federal
previous
lawsuit
already
declared
invalid
broader
question
however
whether
longer
tenable
afford
litigant
one
full
fair
opportunity
judicial
resolution
issue
strongly
suggested
negative
answer
question
lawsuit
defendant
mutuality
principle
forced
present
complete
defense
merits
claim
plaintiff
fully
litigated
lost
prior
action
arguable
misallocation
resources
extent
defendant
second
suit
may
win
asserting
without
contradiction
plaintiff
fully
fairly
unsuccessfully
litigated
claim
prior
suit
defendant
time
money
diverted
alternative
uses
productive
otherwise
relitigation
decided
issue
still
assuming
issue
resolved
correctly
first
suit
reason
concerned
plaintiff
allocation
resources
permitting
repeated
litigation
issue
long
supply
unrelated
defendants
holds
reflects
either
aura
gaming
table
lack
discipline
disinterestedness
part
lower
courts
hardly
worthy
wise
basis
fashioning
rules
procedure
kerotest
mfg
although
neither
judges
parties
adversary
system
performs
perfectly
cases
requirement
determining
whether
party
estoppel
asserted
full
fair
opportunity
litigate
significant
safeguard
case
involved
defensive
use
collateral
estoppel
plaintiff
estopped
asserting
claim
plaintiff
previously
litigated
lost
another
defendant
present
case
contrast
involves
offensive
use
collateral
estoppel
plaintiff
seeking
estop
defendant
relitigating
issues
defendant
previously
litigated
lost
another
plaintiff
offensive
defensive
use
situations
party
estoppel
asserted
litigated
lost
earlier
action
nevertheless
several
reasons
advanced
two
situations
treated
differently
first
offensive
use
collateral
estoppel
promote
judicial
economy
manner
defensive
use
defensive
use
collateral
estoppel
precludes
plaintiff
relitigating
identical
issues
merely
switching
adversaries
bernhard
bank
america
nat
trust
savings
cal
thus
defensive
collateral
estoppel
gives
plaintiff
strong
incentive
join
potential
defendants
first
action
possible
offensive
use
collateral
estoppel
hand
creates
precisely
opposite
incentive
since
plaintiff
able
rely
previous
judgment
defendant
bound
judgment
defendant
wins
plaintiff
every
incentive
adopt
wait
see
attitude
hope
first
action
another
plaintiff
result
favorable
judgment
nevarov
caldwell
cal
app
reardon
allen
super
thus
offensive
use
collateral
estoppel
likely
increase
rather
decrease
total
amount
litigation
since
potential
plaintiffs
everything
gain
nothing
lose
intervening
first
action
second
argument
offensive
use
collateral
estoppel
may
unfair
defendant
defendant
first
action
sued
small
nominal
damages
may
little
incentive
defend
vigorously
particularly
future
suits
foreseeable
evergreens
nunan
cf
berner
british
commonwealth
pac
airlines
application
offensive
collateral
estoppel
denied
defendant
appeal
adverse
judgment
awarding
damages
defendant
later
sued
million
allowing
offensive
collateral
estoppel
may
also
unfair
defendant
judgment
relied
upon
basis
estoppel
inconsistent
one
previous
judgments
favor
defendant
still
another
situation
might
unfair
apply
offensive
estoppel
second
action
affords
defendant
procedural
opportunities
unavailable
first
action
readily
cause
different
result
concluded
preferable
approach
dealing
problems
federal
courts
preclude
use
offensive
collateral
estoppel
grant
trial
courts
broad
discretion
determine
applied
general
rule
cases
plaintiff
easily
joined
earlier
action
either
reasons
discussed
reasons
application
offensive
estoppel
unfair
defendant
trial
judge
allow
use
offensive
collateral
estoppel
present
case
however
none
circumstances
might
justify
reluctance
allow
offensive
use
collateral
estoppel
present
application
offensive
collateral
estoppel
reward
private
plaintiff
joined
previous
action
since
respondent
probably
joined
injunctive
action
brought
sec
even
desired
similarly
unfairness
petitioners
applying
offensive
collateral
estoppel
case
first
light
serious
allegations
made
sec
complaint
petitioners
well
foreseeability
subsequent
private
suits
typically
follow
successful
government
judgment
petitioners
every
incentive
litigate
sec
lawsuit
fully
vigorously
second
judgment
sec
action
inconsistent
previous
decision
finally
respondent
action
procedural
opportunities
available
petitioners
unavailable
first
action
kind
might
likely
cause
different
result
conclude
therefore
none
considerations
justify
refusal
allow
use
offensive
collateral
estoppel
present
case
since
petitioners
received
full
fair
opportunity
litigate
claims
sec
action
contemporary
law
collateral
estoppel
leads
inescapably
conclusion
petitioners
collaterally
estopped
relitigating
question
whether
proxy
statement
materially
false
misleading
ii
question
remains
whether
notwithstanding
law
collateral
estoppel
use
offensive
collateral
estoppel
case
violate
petitioners
seventh
amendment
right
jury
trial
thrust
seventh
amendment
preserve
right
jury
trial
existed
curtis
loether
common
law
litigant
entitled
jury
determine
issues
previously
adjudicated
chancellor
equity
hopkins
lee
wheat
smith
kernochen
brady
daly
shapiro
coquillette
fetish
jury
trial
civil
cases
comment
rachal
hill
harv
rev
effect
action
district
appeals
believed
limit
petitioner
opportunity
fully
try
jury
every
issue
bearing
upon
treble
damage
suit
determination
issue
clearances
judge
might
operate
either
way
res
judicata
collateral
estoppel
conclude
parties
respect
thereto
subsequent
trial
treble
damage
claim
premise
beacon
theatres
fact
enunciated
general
prudential
rule
confirmed
decision
katchen
landy
case
held
bankruptcy
sitting
statutory
equity
empowered
adjudicate
equitable
claims
prior
legal
claims
even
though
factual
issues
decided
equity
action
triable
jury
seventh
amendment
legal
claims
adjudicated
first
stated
beacon
theatres
dairy
queen
recognize
might
situations
proceed
resolve
equitable
claim
first
even
though
results
might
dispositive
issues
involved
legal
claim
despite
strong
support
found
history
recent
decisional
law
proposition
equitable
determination
effect
subsequent
legal
action
petitioners
argue
application
collateral
estoppel
case
nevertheless
violate
seventh
amendment
right
jury
trial
petitioners
contend
since
scope
amendment
must
determined
reference
common
law
existed
since
common
law
permitted
collateral
estoppel
mutuality
parties
collateral
estoppel
constitutionally
applied
mutuality
absent
petitioners
advanced
persuasive
reason
however
meaning
seventh
amendment
depend
whether
mutuality
parties
present
litigant
lost
adverse
factual
findings
equity
action
equally
deprived
jury
trial
whether
estopped
relitigating
factual
issues
party
new
party
either
case
party
estoppel
asserted
litigated
questions
fact
facts
determined
earlier
proceeding
either
case
factfinding
function
jury
perform
since
common
factual
issues
resolved
previous
action
cf
ex
parte
peterson
one
entitled
civil
case
trial
jury
unless
except
far
issues
fact
determined
seventh
amendment
never
interpreted
rigid
manner
advocated
petitioners
contrary
many
procedural
devices
developed
since
diminished
civil
jury
historic
domain
found
inconsistent
seventh
amendment
see
galloway
directed
verdict
violate
seventh
amendment
gasoline
products
champlin
refining
retrial
limited
question
damages
violate
seventh
amendment
even
though
practice
common
law
setting
aside
verdict
part
fidelity
deposit
summary
judgment
violate
seventh
amendment
galloway
case
particularly
instructive
party
directed
verdict
entered
argued
procedure
unconstitutional
seventh
amendment
rejecting
claim
said
amendment
bind
federal
courts
exact
procedural
incidents
details
jury
trial
according
common
law
tied
system
pleading
specific
rules
evidence
prevailing
rules
common
law
prevalent
including
relating
procedure
judge
regulated
jury
role
questions
fact
crystallized
fixed
immutable
system
logical
conclusion
think
one
history
previous
decisions
support
amendment
designed
preserve
basic
institution
jury
trial
fundamental
elements
great
mass
procedural
forms
details
varying
even
widely
among
jurisdictions
omitted
judgment
appeals
affirmed
footnotes
private
plaintiff
action
proxy
rules
entitled
relief
simply
demonstrating
proxy
solicitation
materially
false
misleading
plaintiff
must
also
show
injured
prove
damages
mills
electric
since
sec
action
limited
determination
whether
proxy
statement
contained
materially
false
misleading
information
respondent
conceded
still
prove
elements
prima
facie
case
private
action
petitioners
right
jury
trial
remaining
issues
contested
position
appeals
second
circuit
conflict
taken
appeals
fifth
circuit
rachal
hill
context
offensive
use
collateral
estoppel
occurs
plaintiff
seeks
foreclose
defendant
litigating
issue
defendant
previously
litigated
unsuccessfully
action
another
party
defensive
use
occurs
defendant
seeks
prevent
plaintiff
asserting
claim
plaintiff
previously
litigated
lost
another
defendant
doctrine
res
judicata
judgment
merits
prior
suit
bars
second
suit
involving
parties
privies
based
cause
action
doctrine
collateral
estoppel
hand
second
action
upon
different
cause
action
judgment
prior
suit
precludes
relitigation
issues
actually
litigated
necessary
outcome
first
action
moore
federal
practice
pp
ed
lawlor
national
screen
serv
commissioner
sunnen
cromwell
county
sac
bigelow
old
dominion
copper
principle
general
elementary
law
estoppel
judgment
must
mutual
buckeye
powder
dupont
de
nemours
powder
restatement
judgments
violation
due
process
judgment
binding
litigant
party
privy
therefore
never
opportunity
heard
laboratories
university
illinois
foundation
hansberry
lee
criticism
summarized
opinion
laboratories
university
illinois
foundation
supra
opinion
justice
traynor
unanimous
california
bernhard
bank
america
nat
trust
savings
cal
made
point
succinctly
satisfactory
rationalization
advanced
requirement
mutuality
party
bound
previous
action
precluded
asserting
res
judicata
party
bound
difficult
comprehend
triplett
lowell
held
determination
patent
invalidity
prior
action
bar
plaintiff
relitigating
validity
patent
subsequent
action
different
defendant
holding
triplett
case
explicitly
case
also
emphasized
relitigation
issues
previously
adjudicated
particularly
wasteful
patent
cases
staggering
expense
typical
length
doctrine
mutuality
parties
alleged
infringer
might
find
cheaper
pay
royalties
challenge
patent
declared
invalid
prior
suit
since
holder
patent
entitled
statutory
presumption
validity
various
commentators
expressed
reservations
regarding
application
offensive
collateral
estoppel
currie
mutuality
estoppel
limits
bernhard
doctrine
stan
rev
semmel
collateral
estoppel
mutuality
joinder
parties
colum
rev
note
impacts
defensive
offensive
assertion
collateral
estoppel
nonparty
geo
rev
professor
currie
later
tempered
reservations
civil
procedure
tempest
brews
rev
mutuality
requirement
plaintiff
accomplish
result
since
bound
judgment
original
defendant
restatement
second
judgments
tent
draft
apr
provides
application
collateral
estoppel
may
denied
party
asserting
effected
joinder
first
action
present
adversary
professor
currie
familiar
example
railroad
collision
injures
passengers
bring
separate
actions
railroad
railroad
wins
first
suits
plaintiff
wins
suit
professor
currie
argues
offensive
use
collateral
estoppel
applied
allow
plaintiffs
automatically
recover
currie
supra
stan
see
restatement
second
judgments
supra
example
defendant
first
action
forced
defend
inconvenient
forum
therefore
unable
engage
full
scale
discovery
call
witnesses
application
offensive
collateral
estoppel
may
unwarranted
indeed
differences
available
procedures
may
sometimes
justify
allowing
prior
judgment
estoppel
effect
subsequent
action
even
parties
defensive
estoppel
asserted
plaintiff
litigated
lost
problem
unfairness
particularly
acute
cases
offensive
estoppel
however
defendant
estoppel
asserted
typically
chosen
forum
first
action
see
comment
essentially
approach
recognizes
distinct
trend
clear
weight
recent
authority
effect
intrinsic
difference
offensive
distinct
defensive
issue
preclusion
although
stronger
showing
prior
opportunity
litigate
adequate
may
required
former
situation
latter
reporter
note
sec
everest
management
complicating
effect
additional
issues
additional
parties
outweighs
advantage
single
disposition
common
issues
moreover
consolidation
private
action
one
brought
sec
without
consent
prohibited
statute
trial
petitioners
every
opportunity
present
evidence
call
witnesses
district
held
sec
petitioners
appealed
appeals
second
circuit
affirmed
judgment
moreover
petitioners
already
aware
action
brought
respondent
since
commenced
filing
sec
action
true
course
petitioners
present
action
entitled
jury
trial
issues
bearing
whether
proxy
statement
materially
false
misleading
sec
action
never
brought
matter
discussed
part
ii
opinion
presence
absence
jury
factfinder
basically
neutral
quite
unlike
example
necessity
defending
first
lawsuit
inconvenient
forum
seventh
amendment
provides
suits
common
law
value
controversy
shall
exceed
twenty
dollars
right
jury
trial
shall
preserved
authors
article
conclude
historical
sources
indicates
late
eighteenth
early
nineteenth
centuries
determinations
equity
thought
much
force
determinations
law
possible
impact
jury
trial
rights
viewed
concern
collateral
estoppel
otherwise
warranted
jury
trial
question
stand
way
harv
rule
adopted
restatement
judgments
comment
similarly
dairy
queen
wood
meeker
ambassador
oil
held
legal
claims
ordinarily
tried
equitable
claims
preserve
right
jury
trial
petitioners
reliance
dimick
schiedt
misplaced
dimick
case
held
increase
trial
judge
amount
money
damages
awarded
jury
violated
second
clause
seventh
amendment
provides
fact
tried
jury
shall
otherwise
according
rules
common
law
collateral
estoppel
involve
fact
decided
jury
contrary
whole
premise
collateral
estoppel
issue
resolved
prior
proceeding
factfinding
function
performed
reaching
conclusion
appeals
went
state
doubt
question
whether
petitioners
entitled
jury
redetermination
issues
otherwise
subject
collateral
estoppel
event
resolved
defendants
case
reason
although
fully
aware
pendency
present
suit
throughout
trial
sec
case
made
effort
protect
right
jury
trial
damage
claims
asserted
plaintiffs
either
seeking
expedite
trial
present
action
requesting
judge
duffy
exercise
discretion
pursuant
rule
order
issues
sec
case
tried
jury
advisory
jury
omitted
justice
rehnquist
dissenting
admittedly
difficult
outraged
treatment
accorded
federal
judiciary
petitioners
demand
jury
trial
lawsuit
outrage
emotion
impossible
generate
respect
corporate
defendant
securities
fraud
action
case
exception
nagging
sense
unfairness
way
petitioners
treated
engendered
imprimatur
placed
appeals
respondent
heads
win
tails
lose
theory
litigation
dispelled
antiseptic
analysis
issues
case
may
nation
adopt
new
constitution
today
seventh
amendment
guaranteeing
right
jury
trial
civil
cases
federal
courts
included
among
provisions
present
sentiment
effect
obscure
dilute
obligation
enforce
seventh
amendment
included
bill
rights
since
repealed
manner
provided
constitution
repeal
provisions
right
trial
jury
civil
cases
common
law
fundamental
history
jurisprudence
today
however
reduces
valued
right
blackstone
praised
glory
english
law
mere
neutral
factor
name
procedural
reform
denies
right
jury
trial
defendants
vast
number
cases
defendants
heretofore
enjoyed
jury
trials
years
ago
justice
black
lamented
gradual
process
judicial
erosion
years
slowly
worn
away
major
portion
essential
guarantee
seventh
amendment
galloway
dissenting
opinion
regrettably
erosive
process
continues
apace
today
decision
seventh
amendment
provides
suits
common
law
value
controversy
shall
exceed
twenty
dollars
right
trial
jury
shall
preserved
fact
tried
jury
shall
otherwise
reexamined
according
rules
common
law
perhaps
easy
forget
years
removed
events
right
trial
jury
held
esteem
colonists
deprivation
hands
english
one
important
grievances
leading
break
england
see
sources
documents
illustrating
american
revolution
formation
federal
constitution
morison
ed
pound
development
constitutional
guarantees
liberty
ubbelohde
courts
american
revolution
extensive
use
courts
colonial
administrators
eliminate
colonists
right
jury
trial
listed
among
specific
offensive
english
acts
denounced
declaration
independence
war
broken
newly
formed
restored
institution
civil
jury
trial
prior
prominence
expressly
guaranteed
right
state
constitutions
others
recognized
statute
common
practice
indeed
right
trial
jury
probably
one
universally
secured
first
american
state
constitutions
levy
legacy
suppression
freedom
speech
press
early
american
history
one
might
justly
wonder
mention
right
jury
trial
civil
cases
found
way
constitution
emerged
philadelphia
convention
article
iii
cl
merely
provides
trial
crimes
except
cases
impeachment
shall
jury
omission
clause
protective
civil
jury
right
lack
trying
however
pinckney
gerry
proposed
provide
clause
securing
right
jury
trial
civil
cases
efforts
failed
several
reasons
advanced
failure
federalists
argued
practice
civil
juries
among
several
varied
much
difficult
draft
constitutional
language
accommodate
different
state
practices
see
colgrove
battin
supra
whatever
reason
omission
however
clear
even
delegates
left
philadelphia
plans
way
attack
proposed
constitution
ground
failed
contain
guarantee
civil
jury
trial
new
federal
courts
see
rutland
george
mason
wolfram
virtually
complete
absence
bill
rights
proposed
constitution
principal
focus
attack
constitution
lack
provision
civil
juries
featured
prominently
arguments
see
parsons
bedford
pet
pleas
struck
responsive
chord
populace
price
exacted
many
approval
constitution
appending
list
recommended
amendments
chief
among
clause
securing
right
jury
trial
civil
cases
responding
pressures
civil
jury
guarantee
generated
ratification
debates
first
congress
new
constitution
first
session
proposed
amend
constitution
adding
following
language
suits
common
law
man
man
trial
jury
one
best
securities
rights
people
remain
inviolate
annals
cong
provision
altered
language
became
seventh
amendment
proposed
congress
legislatures
several
became
effective
ratification
virginia
december
foregoing
sketch
meant
suggest
many
oppose
use
juries
civil
trials
seem
ignore
founders
nation
considered
right
trial
jury
civil
cases
important
bulwark
tyranny
corruption
safeguard
precious
left
whim
sovereign
might
added
judiciary
passionately
advocated
right
civil
jury
trial
considered
jury
familiar
procedural
device
continued
concerns
institution
jury
trial
led
passages
declaration
independence
seventh
amendment
animated
belief
use
juries
lead
efficient
judicial
administration
trial
jury
laymen
rather
sovereign
judges
important
founders
juries
represent
layman
common
sense
passional
elements
nature
thus
keep
administration
law
accord
wishes
feelings
community
holmes
collected
legal
papers
favored
juries
believed
jury
reach
result
judge
either
reach
values
underlie
seventh
amendment
mind
obviously
approach
decision
case
seventh
amendment
requires
right
trial
jury
preserved
seventh
amendment
demands
preservation
jury
trial
right
cases
uniformly
held
content
right
must
judged
historical
standards
curtis
loether
colgrove
battin
ross
bernhard
capital
traction
hof
parsons
bedford
supra
thus
baltimore
carolina
line
redman
stated
right
trial
jury
thus
preserved
right
existed
english
common
law
amendment
adopted
dimick
schiedt
held
order
ascertain
scope
meaning
seventh
amendment
resort
must
appropriate
rules
common
law
established
time
adoption
constitutional
provision
jury
impaneled
particular
kind
case
seventh
amendment
requires
jury
trial
today
either
party
desires
sure
substance
right
jury
trial
preserved
incidental
collateral
effects
practice
walker
new
mexico
aim
amendment
held
preserve
substance
right
trial
jury
distinguished
mere
matters
form
procedure
particularly
retain
distinction
province
jury
baltimore
carolina
line
redman
supra
accord
colgrove
battin
supra
gasoline
products
champlin
refining
ex
parte
peterson
amendment
bind
federal
courts
exact
procedural
incidents
details
jury
trial
according
common
law
tied
system
pleading
specific
rules
evidence
prevailing
galloway
say
seventh
amendment
tie
federal
courts
exact
procedure
common
law
imply
however
nominally
procedural
change
implemented
regardless
impact
functions
jury
sanction
creation
procedural
devices
limit
province
jury
greater
degree
permitted
common
law
direct
contravention
seventh
amendment
see
neely
martin
eby
constr
galloway
supra
dimick
schiedt
supra
ex
parte
peterson
supra
since
deal
common
law
qua
common
law
constitution
amount
argument
device
provides
efficiency
accuracy
fairer
save
degree
invasion
jury
province
greater
allowed
rule
otherwise
effectively
permit
judicial
repeal
seventh
amendment
nearly
change
province
jury
matter
drastic
diminution
functions
always
denominated
procedural
reform
guarantees
seventh
amendment
prove
burdensome
instances
civil
jury
surely
burden
english
governors
stead
substituted
provisions
bill
rights
onerous
nature
protection
license
contracting
rights
secured
amendment
aintenance
jury
body
importance
occupies
firm
place
history
jurisprudence
seeming
curtailment
right
jury
trial
scrutinized
utmost
care
dimick
schiedt
supra
quoted
beacon
theatres
westover
judged
foregoing
principles
think
clear
petitioners
denied
seventh
amendment
right
jury
trial
case
neither
respondent
doubts
common
law
existed
petitioners
entitled
private
action
jury
determine
whether
proxy
statement
false
misleading
respects
alleged
reason
common
law
collateral
estoppel
permitted
parties
first
action
identical
privity
parties
subsequent
action
doctrine
mutuality
abrogated
certain
limited
circumstances
laboratories
university
illinois
foundation
developments
doctrine
collateral
estoppel
however
salutary
consistent
seventh
amendment
contract
material
fashion
right
jury
trial
defendant
enjoyed
instant
case
resort
doctrine
collateral
estoppel
merely
contract
right
jury
trial
eliminates
right
entirely
therefore
contravenes
seventh
amendment
responds
however
common
law
litigant
entitled
jury
subsequent
action
law
parties
determine
issues
previously
adjudicated
chancellor
equity
petitioners
advanced
persuasive
reason
meaning
seventh
amendment
depend
whether
mutuality
parties
present
ante
tantamount
saying
since
party
entitled
jury
trial
brought
equitable
action
persuasive
reason
receive
jury
trial
virtually
issues
instead
chooses
bring
lawsuit
nature
legal
action
persuasive
reason
seventh
amendment
requires
party
right
jury
trial
existed
common
law
preserved
incursions
government
judiciary
whether
believes
use
jury
trial
particular
instance
necessary
fair
repetitive
simply
irrelevant
view
rigid
constitution
commands
rigidity
hold
otherwise
rewrite
seventh
amendment
party
guaranteed
jury
trial
civil
cases
unless
thinks
jury
trial
inappropriate
doubt
parallel
procedural
reforms
instituted
area
criminal
jurisprudence
accomplish
much
sort
expedition
calendars
conservation
judicial
resources
extension
collateral
estoppel
civil
litigation
government
motions
summary
judgment
directed
verdict
favor
prosecution
close
evidence
presumably
save
countless
hours
judges
jurors
time
scarcely
doubted
though
procedural
reforms
survive
constitutional
scrutiny
jury
trial
guarantee
sixth
amendment
principle
separation
powers
incorporated
framers
constitution
order
promote
efficiency
dispatch
business
government
right
jury
trial
guaranteed
order
facilitate
prompt
accurate
decision
lawsuits
essence
right
lies
insistence
body
laymen
permanently
attached
sovereign
participate
along
judge
factfinding
necessitated
lawsuit
essence
much
part
seventh
amendment
guarantee
civil
cases
sixth
amendment
guarantee
criminal
prosecutions
cf
thiel
southern
pacific
relying
galloway
gasoline
products
champlin
refining
fidelity
deposit
seems
suggest
offensive
use
collateral
estoppel
case
permissible
limited
principle
set
forth
mere
procedural
change
invade
province
jury
defendant
right
thereto
greater
extent
authorized
common
law
permissible
actions
today
constitute
far
greater
infringement
defendant
rights
ever
sanctioned
galloway
upheld
modern
form
directed
verdict
seventh
amendment
challenge
clear
similar
form
directed
verdict
existed
common
law
beauchamp
borret
peake
eng
coupey
henley
esp
eng
modern
form
materially
alter
function
jury
similarly
modern
device
summary
judgment
found
violate
seventh
amendment
demurrer
evidence
procedural
device
substantially
similar
summary
judgment
common
practice
pawling
cranch
procedural
devices
summary
judgment
directed
verdict
direct
descendants
antecedents
accomplish
nothing
done
common
law
albeit
cumbersome
procedure
see
also
montgomery
ward
duncan
common
law
apparently
practice
setting
aside
verdict
part
gasoline
products
permitted
partial
retrial
distinct
separable
issues
change
procedure
impair
substance
right
jury
trial
parties
gasoline
products
still
enjoyed
right
jury
determine
issues
fact
contrast
development
nonmutual
estoppel
substantial
departure
common
law
use
case
completely
deprives
petitioners
right
jury
determine
contested
issues
fact
simply
unwilling
accept
presumption
complete
extinguishment
petitioners
right
trial
jury
justified
mere
change
procedural
incident
detail
years
ago
justice
sutherland
observed
dissimilar
case
special
sense
charged
duty
construing
upholding
constitution
discharge
important
duty
ever
must
alert
see
doubtful
precedent
extended
mere
analogy
different
case
result
weaken
subvert
conceives
principle
fundamental
law
land
dimick
schiedt
ii
even
accepting
arguendo
majority
position
violation
seventh
amendment
nonetheless
sanction
use
collateral
estoppel
case
today
holds
general
rule
cases
plaintiff
easily
joined
earlier
action
either
reasons
discussed
reasons
application
offensive
estoppel
unfair
defendant
trial
judge
allow
use
offensive
collateral
estoppel
ante
first
use
offensive
collateral
estoppel
case
runs
counter
strong
federal
policy
favoring
jury
trials
even
majority
holds
violate
seventh
amendment
decision
beacon
theatres
westover
exemplifies
policy
beacon
theatres
held
equitable
legal
claims
defenses
presented
single
case
imperative
circumstances
circumstances
view
flexible
procedures
federal
rules
anticipate
right
jury
trial
legal
issues
lost
prior
determination
equitable
claims
jacob
new
york
stated
right
jury
trial
civil
cases
common
law
basic
fundamental
feature
system
federal
jurisprudence
protected
seventh
amendment
right
fundamental
sacred
citizen
whether
guaranteed
constitution
provided
statute
jealously
guarded
courts
accord
simler
conner
byrd
blue
ridge
rural
electric
cooperative
strong
federal
policy
favor
juries
requires
jury
trials
diversity
cases
regardless
state
practice
today
decision
mean
large
number
private
cases
defendants
longer
enjoy
right
jury
trial
neither
respondent
adverted
cited
unmanageable
problems
resulted
according
defendants
jury
trials
cases
simply
see
imperative
circumstances
requiring
wholesale
abrogation
jury
trials
second
believe
opportunity
jury
trial
second
action
easily
lead
different
result
obtained
first
action
therefore
unfair
estop
petitioners
relitigating
issues
jury
position
adopted
restatement
second
judgments
disapproves
application
offensive
collateral
estoppel
defendant
opportunity
jury
trial
second
lawsuit
available
first
action
accepts
proposition
unfair
apply
offensive
collateral
estoppel
second
action
affords
defendant
procedural
opportunities
unavailable
first
action
readily
cause
different
result
ante
differences
discovery
opportunities
two
actions
cited
examples
situations
unfair
permit
offensive
collateral
estoppel
ante
view
fact
petitioners
entitled
jury
trial
present
action
procedural
opportunit
presence
absence
jury
factfinder
basically
neutral
quite
unlike
example
necessity
defending
first
lawsuit
inconvenient
forum
ante
emphasis
added
evident
prior
brief
discussion
development
civil
jury
trial
guarantee
country
drafted
declaration
independence
debated
passionately
proposed
constitution
ratification
period
indeed
astounded
learn
presence
absence
jury
merely
neutral
whereas
availability
discovery
device
unmentioned
constitution
may
controlling
precisely
framers
believed
might
receive
different
result
hands
jury
peers
mercy
sovereign
judges
seventh
amendment
adopted
suspect
anyone
litigates
cases
juries
equally
amazed
hear
supposed
lack
distinction
trial
trial
jury
cite
authority
support
curious
proposition
merits
civil
juries
long
debated
suspect
juries
never
accused
merely
neutral
factors
contrary
majority
supposition
juries
make
difference
cases
today
least
recognized
obvious
fact
thus
colgrove
battin
stated
purpose
jury
trial
civil
cases
assure
fair
equitable
resolution
factual
issues
gasoline
products
champlin
byrd
blue
ridge
rural
electrical
cooperative
supra
conceded
nature
tribunal
tries
issues
may
important
enforcement
parcel
rights
making
cause
action
defense
may
well
instant
case
outcome
substantially
affected
whether
issue
immunity
decided
judge
jury
see
curtis
loether
cf
duncan
louisiana
jurors
bring
case
common
sense
community
values
inexperience
asset
secures
fresh
perception
trial
avoiding
stereotypes
said
infect
judicial
eye
kalven
zeisel
american
jury
ultimate
irony
today
decision
potential
significantly
conserving
resources
either
litigants
judiciary
doubtful
best
case
see
absolutely
reason
frustrate
cavalierly
important
federal
policy
favoring
jury
decisions
disputed
fact
questions
instant
case
apt
example
minimal
savings
accomplished
decision
admits
even
petitioners
collaterally
estopped
relitigating
whether
proxy
materially
false
misleading
still
entitled
jury
determine
whether
respondent
injured
alleged
misstatements
amount
damages
sustained
respondent
ante
thus
jury
must
impaneled
case
event
time
saved
trying
issue
whether
proxy
materially
false
misleading
jury
likely
insubstantial
probable
today
decision
result
coercing
defendants
agree
consent
orders
settlements
agency
enforcement
actions
order
preserve
right
jury
trial
private
actions
event
compelling
reason
simply
added
powerful
club
administrative
agencies
arsenals
even
congress
unwilling
provide
believe
use
offensive
collateral
estoppel
particular
case
improper
necessary
decide
whether
approve
use
circumstances
defendant
right
jury
trial
impaired
see
colgrove
battin
capital
traction
hof
parsons
bedford
pet
henderson
background
seventh
amendment
harv
rev
hereinafter
henderson
wolfram
constitutional
history
seventh
amendment
rev
hereinafter
wolfram
see
also
wonson
cas
cc
mass
story
declaration
independence
depriving
us
many
cases
benefits
trial
jury
two
years
earlier
declaration
rights
adopted
october
first
continental
congress
unanimously
resolved
respective
colonies
entitled
common
law
england
especially
great
inestimable
privilege
tried
peers
vicinage
according
course
law
journals
continental
congress
holdsworth
written
new
methods
adopted
strengthen
administration
british
laws
effective
therefore
disliked
extension
given
jurisdiction
reorganized
courts
admiralty
effective
deprived
defendant
right
tried
jury
almost
certain
acquit
holdsworth
history
english
law
courts
dealt
chiefly
criminal
offenses
jurisdiction
also
extended
many
areas
civil
law
wolfram
ga
art
lxi
federal
state
constitutions
colonial
charters
organic
laws
thorpe
ed
hereinafter
thorpe
md
art
iii
thorpe
mass
art
xv
thorpe
art
xx
thorpe
art
xxii
thorpe
art
xli
thorpe
declaration
rights
art
xiv
thorpe
pa
declaration
rights
art
xi
thorpe
art
xli
thorpe
va
bill
rights
thorpe
see
wolfram
congress
adopted
northwest
ordinance
governance
territories
west
appalachians
included
guarantee
trial
jury
civil
cases
thorpe
proposal
add
following
language
art
iii
trial
jury
shall
preserved
usual
civil
cases
farrand
records
federal
convention
debate
regarding
proposal
quoted
colgrove
battin
supra
objection
gorham
massachusetts
constitution
juries
different
different
trial
usual
different
cases
different
farrand
supra
commentators
suggested
several
additional
reasons
failure
convention
include
civil
jury
guarantee
see
henderson
true
reason
omitting
similar
provision
civil
juries
least
part
convention
members
simply
wanted
go
home
wolfram
see
henderson
wolfram
virginia
recommended
jury
trial
amendment
typical
controversies
respecting
property
suits
man
man
ancient
trial
jury
one
greatest
securities
rights
people
remain
sacred
inviolable
elliot
debates
federal
constitution
ed
judiciary
act
september
passed
within
six
months
organization
new
government
day
first
amendments
proposed
legislatures
first
congress
provided
civil
jury
trial
right
stat
thomas
jefferson
stated
consider
trial
jury
anchor
yet
imagined
man
government
held
principles
constitution
writings
thomas
jefferson
washington
ed
wolfram
professor
wolfram
written
antifederalists
arguing
institution
civil
jury
trial
belief
jury
trials
short
inexpensive
decorous
productive
decisions
judges
sitting
without
juries
produce
inconveniences
jury
trial
accepted
precisely
important
instances
ability
disregard
substantive
rules
law
jury
reach
result
judge
either
reach
favored
civil
jury
misguided
tinkerers
procedural
devices
day
libertarians
avowed
important
areas
protection
litigants
general
debtors
particular
placed
grave
danger
unless
required
juries
sit
civil
cases
majority
suggests
dimick
schiedt
relevant
decision
case
dealt
second
clause
seventh
amendment
ante
disagree
intimation
opinion
first
clause
treated
differently
second
dimick
respect
guarantees
seventh
amendment
applies
much
first
clause
second
see
smith
kernochen
hopkins
lee
wheat
buller
introduction
law
relative
trials
nisi
prius
ed
peake
compendium
law
evidence
ed
decision
laboratories
university
illinois
foundation
facts
limited
defensive
use
collateral
estoppel
patent
cases
abandonment
mutuality
recent
development
case
bernhard
bank
america
nat
trust
sav
cal
generally
considered
seminal
case
adopting
new
approach
decided
see
henderson
england
phrase
direct
verdict
common
commonplace
instruct
jury
plaintiff
entitled
recover
plaintiff
must
verdict
scott
trial
jury
reform
civil
procedure
harv
rev
cases
cited
therein
demur
party
admit
truth
facts
adduced
every
adverse
inference
drawn
therefrom
determine
party
receive
judgment
basis
admitted
facts
inferences
see
slocum
new
york
life
ins
gibson
hunter
bl
eng
henderson
scott
supra
gasoline
products
quoted
lord
mansfield
stated
verdict
correct
one
issue
erroneous
another
form
sake
must
set
aside
whole
verdict
edie
east
india
bl
quoted
agree
petitioners
right
jury
trial
equitable
injunctive
action
brought
sec
ante
meeker
ambassador
oil
per
curiam
case
doctrine
collateral
estoppel
yielded
right
jury
trial
meeker
plaintiffs
asserted
equitable
legal
claims
presented
common
issues
demanded
jury
trial
trial
tried
equitable
claim
first
decided
claim
common
issues
adversely
plaintiffs
result
held
plaintiffs
precluded
relitigating
issues
jury
legal
claim
plaintiffs
appealed
alleging
denial
right
jury
trial
tenth
circuit
affirmed
trial
reversed
appeals
basis
beacon
theatres
westover
dairy
queen
wood
even
though
unlike
cases
equitable
action
meeker
already
tried
common
issues
determined
thus
even
though
plaintiffs
meeker
received
full
fair
opportunity
try
common
issues
prior
equitable
action
nonetheless
given
opportunity
retry
issues
jury
today
decision
totally
inconsistent
meeker
fails
explain
inconsistency
decision
today
may
well
extend
areas
antitrust
labor
employment
discrimination
consumer
protection
like
private
plaintiff
may
sue
damages
based
similar
violations
subject
government
actions
say
congress
commit
enforcement
statutorily
created
rights
administrative
process
specialized
equity
curtis
loether
see
atlas
roofing
occupational
safety
health
review
katchen
landy
nlrb
jones
laughlin
steel
restatement
second
judgments
comment
tent
draft
apr
citing
rachal
hill
cert
denied
reporter
note
differences
procedures
available
first
second
actions
sufficient
deny
issue
preclusion
parties
may
warrant
refusal
carry
preclusion
action
involving
another
party
restatement
supra
see
hearings
recording
jury
deliberations
subcommittee
investigate
administration
internal
security
act
internal
security
laws
senate
committee
judiciary
thorough
summary
arguments
pro
con
jury
trials
extensive
bibliography
kalven
zeisel
american
jury
bibliography
redish
seventh
amendment
right
jury
trial
study
irrationality
rational
decision
making
nw
rev
discussion
arguments
juries
much
delay
jury
trials
attributed
jury
selection
voir
dire
charge
see
zeisel
kalven
buchholz
delay
none
delaying
factors
avoided
today
decision