mills
electric
argued
november
decided
january
petitioners
minority
shareholders
respondent
electric
brought
action
derivatively
behalf
minority
shareholders
class
set
aside
merger
mergenthaler
linotype
merger
owned
half
stock
petitioners
charged
proxy
solicitation
merger
management
materially
misleading
violated
securities
exchange
act
rule
thereunder
merger
recommended
shareholders
company
directors
without
disclosing
nominees
controlled
mergenthaler
district
petitioners
motion
summary
judgment
ruled
claimed
defect
proxy
statement
material
omission
hearing
concluded
without
votes
minority
stockholders
approval
merger
achieved
causal
relationship
thus
shown
finding
violation
alleged
injury
petitioners
referred
case
master
consider
appropriate
relief
interlocutory
appeal
appeals
affirmed
conclusion
proxy
statement
materially
deficient
held
granting
summary
judgment
respect
causation
erroneous
necessary
resolve
trial
whether
causal
relationship
deficiency
proxy
statement
merger
finding
causation
directly
established
impracticalities
determining
many
votes
affected
ruled
issue
determined
proof
fairness
merger
respondents
prove
fairness
concluded
sufficient
number
shareholders
approved
merger
regardless
misrepresentation
held
fairness
merger
terms
constitute
defense
private
action
violation
act
complaining
materially
misleading
solicitation
proxies
authorized
corporate
merger
pp
permitting
liability
foreclosed
basis
finding
merger
fair
contravene
purpose
bypassing
stockholders
pp
imposing
small
shareholders
burden
rebutting
corporation
evidence
fairness
discourage
private
enforcement
proxy
rules
provides
necessary
supplement
commission
action
case
borak
pp
evidence
submitted
hearing
causal
relationship
proxy
material
merger
sufficient
establish
petitioners
cause
action
proof
misstatement
omission
proxy
statement
material
showing
defect
might
considered
important
shaping
shareholders
vote
sufficient
without
proof
appeals
erroneously
held
necessary
effect
decisive
pp
devising
retrospective
relief
violation
proxy
rules
federal
courts
guided
principles
equity
pp
fairness
merger
may
relevant
consideration
determining
appropriate
relief
merger
set
aside
equity
concludes
circumstances
equitable
pp
damages
recoverable
extent
proved
pp
petitioners
established
violation
securities
laws
corporation
officials
entitled
interim
award
litigation
expenses
reasonable
attorneys
fees
incurred
proving
violation
since
expenses
petitioners
incurred
benefit
corporation
stockholders
decide
question
reimbursement
litigation
expenses
incurred
ensuing
proceedings
pp
arnold
shure
argued
cause
petitioners
briefs
robert
sprecher
edward
gadsby
mozart
ratner
albert
jenner
argued
cause
respondents
brief
jerold
solovy
john
stifler
solicitor
general
griswold
lawrence
wallace
philip
loomis
david
ferber
meyer
eisenberg
filed
brief
amicus
curiae
justice
harlan
delivered
opinion
case
requires
us
consider
basic
aspect
implied
private
right
action
violation
securities
exchange
act
recognized
case
borak
borak
asserted
wrong
corporate
merger
accomplished
use
proxy
statement
materially
false
misleading
question
deal
causal
relationship
must
shown
statement
merger
establish
cause
action
based
violation
act
count
ii
amended
complaint
count
us
petitioners
predicated
jurisdiction
act
alleged
proxy
statement
sent
management
solicit
shareholders
votes
favor
merger
misleading
violation
act
sec
rule
thereunder
cfr
petitioners
recited
merger
mergenthaler
owned
outstanding
shares
common
stock
control
two
years
american
manufacturing
turn
owned
outstanding
shares
mergenthaler
two
years
voting
control
mergenthaler
petitioners
charged
light
circumstances
proxy
statement
misleading
told
shareholders
board
directors
recommended
approval
merger
without
also
informing
directors
nominees
mergenthaler
control
domination
mergenthaler
petitioners
asserted
right
complain
alleged
violation
derivatively
behalf
representatives
class
minority
shareholders
petitioners
motion
summary
judgment
respect
count
ii
district
northern
district
illinois
ruled
matter
law
claimed
defect
proxy
statement
light
circumstances
statement
made
material
omission
district
concluded
reading
borak
opinion
hold
hearing
issue
whether
causal
connection
finding
violation
disclosure
requirements
alleged
injury
plaintiffs
consider
remedies
appropriate
unreported
opinion
dated
february
holding
hearing
found
terms
merger
agreement
affirmative
vote
shares
required
approval
merger
respondent
companies
owned
controlled
outstanding
shares
therefore
obtain
authorization
merger
respondents
secure
approval
substantial
number
minority
shareholders
stockholders
meeting
approximately
shares
shares
outstanding
voted
favor
merger
included
votes
obtained
proxy
minority
shareholders
votes
necessary
indispensable
approval
merger
district
concluded
causal
relationship
thus
shown
granted
interlocutory
judgment
favor
petitioners
issue
liability
referring
case
master
consideration
appropriate
relief
unreported
findings
conclusions
dated
opinion
reported
supp
district
made
certification
required
respondents
took
interlocutory
appeal
appeals
seventh
circuit
affirmed
district
conclusion
proxy
statement
materially
deficient
reversed
question
causation
acknowledged
injunction
sought
sufficient
time
stockholders
meeting
corrective
measures
appropriate
however
since
suit
brought
late
preventive
action
courts
determine
whether
misleading
statement
omission
caused
submission
sufficient
proxies
prerequisite
determination
liability
act
respondents
show
preponderance
probabilities
merger
received
sufficient
vote
even
proxy
statement
misleading
respect
found
petitioners
entitled
relief
kind
appeals
acknowledged
test
corresponds
fraud
test
whether
injured
party
relied
misrepresentation
however
rightly
concluding
eliance
thousands
individuals
scarcely
inquired
ruled
issue
determined
proof
fairness
terms
merger
respondents
show
merger
merit
fair
minority
shareholders
trial
justified
concluding
sufficient
number
shareholders
approved
merger
deficiency
proxy
statement
case
respondents
entitled
judgment
favor
claiming
appeals
construed
decision
borak
manner
frustrates
statute
policy
enforcement
private
litigation
petitioners
sought
review
granted
certiorari
believing
resolution
basic
issue
made
stage
litigation
postponed
trial
appeals
decision
ii
result
insulate
private
redress
entire
category
proxy
violations
relating
matters
terms
merger
even
outrageous
misrepresentations
proxy
solicitation
relate
terms
transaction
give
rise
cause
action
particularly
carried
enforcement
actions
securities
exchange
commission
result
subvert
congressional
purpose
ensuring
full
fair
disclosure
shareholders
recognition
fairness
merger
complete
defense
confront
small
shareholders
additional
obstacle
making
successful
challenge
proposal
recommended
defective
proxy
statement
risk
unable
rebut
corporation
evidence
fairness
proposal
thus
establish
cause
action
bound
discourage
shareholders
private
enforcement
proxy
rules
provides
necessary
supplement
commission
action
case
borak
frustration
congressional
policy
required
anything
wording
statute
opinion
borak
case
section
declares
unlawful
solicit
proxies
contravention
commission
rules
sec
rule
prohibits
solicitations
containing
statement
false
misleading
respect
material
fact
omits
state
material
fact
necessary
order
make
statements
therein
false
misleading
use
solicitation
materially
misleading
violation
law
appeals
recognized
stating
injunctive
relief
available
remedy
defect
sought
prior
stockholders
meeting
borak
came
dismissal
complaint
limited
inquiry
whether
violation
gives
rise
federal
cause
action
rescission
damages
referring
argument
made
petitioners
merger
dissolved
fraudulent
issues
upon
proxy
material
bear
stated
causal
relationship
proxy
material
merger
questions
fact
resolved
trial
therefore
discuss
point
present
case
hearing
specifically
directed
causation
problem
question
whether
facts
found
basis
hearing
sufficient
law
establish
petitioners
cause
action
conclude
misstatement
omission
proxy
statement
shown
material
found
determination
indubitably
embodies
conclusion
defect
character
might
considered
important
reasonable
shareholder
process
deciding
vote
requirement
defect
significant
propensity
affect
voting
process
found
express
terms
rule
adequately
serves
purpose
ensuring
cause
action
established
proof
defect
trivial
unrelated
transaction
approval
sought
correction
defect
imposition
liability
interests
protected
need
supplement
requirement
appeals
requirement
proof
whether
defect
actually
decisive
effect
voting
finding
materiality
shareholder
made
sufficient
showing
causal
relationship
violation
injury
seeks
redress
proves
proxy
solicitation
rather
particular
defect
solicitation
materials
essential
link
accomplishment
transaction
objective
test
avoid
impracticalities
determining
many
votes
affected
resolving
doubts
favor
statute
designed
protect
effectuate
congressional
policy
ensuring
shareholders
able
make
informed
choice
consulted
corporate
transactions
cf
union
pac
chicago
supp
loss
securities
regulation
ed
supp
iii
read
act
declares
contracts
made
violation
act
rule
thereunder
void
regards
rights
violator
knowing
successors
interest
requiring
merger
set
aside
simply
merger
agreement
void
contract
language
establishes
guilty
party
precluded
enforcing
contract
unwilling
innocent
party
compel
conclusion
contract
nullity
creating
enforceable
rights
even
party
innocent
violation
lower
federal
courts
read
counterparts
holding
company
act
investment
company
act
investment
advisers
act
rendering
contract
merely
voidable
option
innocent
party
see
greater
iowa
mclendon
cir
royal
air
properties
smith
cir
bankers
life
cas
bellanca
cir
kaminsky
abrams
supp
maher
williston
beane
supp
cf
green
brown
supp
remanded
grounds
cir
investment
company
act
see
also
loss
supra
supp
interpretation
eminently
sensible
interests
victim
sufficiently
protected
giving
right
rescind
regard
contract
void
invoked
right
create
possibility
hardships
others
without
necessarily
advancing
statutory
policy
disclosure
amicus
curiae
points
representatives
minority
shareholders
petitioners
parties
merger
agreement
thus
enjoy
statutory
right
set
aside
furthermore
derivative
right
invoke
status
party
agreement
determination
relief
granted
name
must
hinge
whether
setting
aside
merger
best
interests
shareholders
whole
short
context
suit
one
leaves
matter
relief
borak
without
specific
statutory
language
merger
set
aside
equity
concludes
circumstances
equitable
cf
sec
national
securities
monetary
relief
course
also
possibility
defect
proxy
solicitation
relates
specific
terms
merger
district
might
appropriately
order
accounting
ensure
shareholders
receive
value
represented
coming
hand
misleading
aspect
solicitation
relate
terms
merger
monetary
relief
might
afforded
shareholders
merger
resulted
reduction
earnings
earnings
potential
holdings
short
damages
recoverable
extent
shown
commingling
assets
operations
merged
companies
makes
impossible
establish
direct
injury
merger
relief
might
predicated
determination
fairness
terms
merger
time
approved
questions
course
decision
first
instance
district
remand
singling
possibilities
intended
exclude
others
iv
absence
express
statutory
authorization
award
attorneys
fees
suit
preclude
award
cases
type
suit
stockholders
recover
profits
corporation
act
appeals
second
circuit
awarded
attorneys
fees
despite
lack
provision
theory
corporation
received
benefit
attorney
services
pay
reasonable
value
thereof
smolowe
delendo
cir
held
congress
inclusion
act
express
provisions
recovery
attorneys
fees
certain
types
suits
impinge
upon
result
reach
absence
statute
sections
merely
enforce
additional
penalty
wrongdoer
ibid
agree
second
circuit
specific
provisions
read
denying
courts
power
award
counsel
fees
suits
sections
act
circumstances
make
award
appropriate
express
creation
sections
private
liabilities
negates
possibility
implied
right
action
remedial
provisions
act
far
different
lanham
act
stat
held
preclude
award
attorneys
fees
suit
trademark
infringement
fleischmann
maier
brewing
since
congress
lanham
act
meticulously
detailed
remedies
available
plaintiff
proves
valid
trademark
infringed
fleischmann
concluded
express
remedial
provisions
intended
mark
boundaries
power
award
monetary
relief
cases
arising
act
contrast
fairly
infer
securities
exchange
act
purpose
circumscribe
courts
power
grant
appropriate
remedies
cf
bakery
workers
union
ratner
app
act
makes
provision
private
recovery
violation
declaration
voidness
leaving
courts
task
faced
borak
deciding
whether
private
right
action
implied
courts
must
similarly
determine
whether
special
circumstances
exist
justify
award
attorneys
fees
including
reasonable
expenses
litigation
statutory
costs
general
american
rule
attorneys
fees
ordinarily
recoverable
costs
courts
congress
developed
exceptions
rule
situations
overriding
considerations
indicate
need
recovery
primary
exception
award
expenses
plaintiff
successfully
maintained
suit
usually
behalf
class
benefits
group
others
manner
see
fleischmann
maier
brewing
allow
others
obtain
full
benefit
plaintiff
efforts
without
contributing
equally
litigation
expenses
enrich
others
unjustly
plaintiff
expense
suit
presents
situation
dissemination
misleading
proxy
solicitations
deceit
practiced
stockholders
group
case
borak
expenses
petitioners
lawsuit
incurred
benefit
corporation
shareholders
fact
suit
yet
produced
may
never
produce
monetary
recovery
fees
paid
preclude
award
based
rationale
although
earliest
cases
recognizing
right
reimbursement
involved
litigation
produced
preserved
common
fund
benefit
group
nothing
cases
indicates
suit
must
actually
bring
money
prerequisite
power
order
reimbursement
expenses
foundation
historic
practice
granting
reimbursement
costs
litigation
conventional
taxable
costs
part
original
authority
chancellor
equity
particular
situation
sprague
ticonic
nat
bank
sprague
upheld
district
power
grant
reimbursement
plaintiff
litigation
expenses
even
though
sued
behalf
class
success
stare
decisis
effect
entitling
others
recover
specific
assets
defendant
although
others
parties
forced
contribute
costs
suit
order
reimbursing
plaintiff
defendant
assets
recoveries
later
come
observed
absence
avowed
class
suit
creation
fund
stare
decisis
rather
decree
hardly
touch
es
power
equity
justice
party
beneficiaries
litigation
cases
departed
traditional
metes
bounds
doctrine
permit
reimbursement
cases
litigation
conferred
substantial
benefit
members
ascertainable
class
jurisdiction
subject
matter
suit
makes
possible
award
operate
spread
costs
proportionately
among
development
pronounced
shareholders
derivative
actions
courts
increasingly
recognized
expenses
incurred
one
shareholder
vindication
corporate
right
action
spread
among
shareholders
award
corporation
regardless
whether
actual
money
recovery
obtained
corporation
favor
example
awards
sustained
suits
stockholders
complaining
shares
corporation
issued
wrongfully
inadequate
consideration
successful
suit
type
resulting
cancellation
shares
bring
fund
add
assets
corporation
benefit
holders
remaining
shares
enhancing
value
similarly
holders
voting
trust
certificates
allowed
reimbursement
expenses
corporation
succeeded
terminating
voting
trust
obtaining
certificate
holders
right
vote
shares
cases
common
fund
sense
jurisdiction
corporation
nominal
defendant
made
possible
assess
fees
shareholders
award
corporation
many
instances
benefit
conferred
capable
expression
monetary
terms
estimating
increase
market
value
shares
attributable
successful
litigation
however
increasing
number
lower
courts
acknowledged
corporation
may
receive
substantial
benefit
derivative
suit
justifying
award
counsel
fees
regardless
whether
benefit
pecuniary
nature
leading
case
bosch
meeker
cooperative
light
power
stockholder
reimbursed
expenses
obtaining
judicial
declaration
election
certain
corporation
directors
invalid
minnesota
stated
action
stockholder
results
substantial
benefit
corporation
recover
costs
expenses
substantial
benefit
must
something
technical
consequence
one
accomplishes
result
corrects
prevents
abuse
prejudicial
rights
interests
corporation
affect
enjoyment
protection
essential
right
stockholder
interest
foregoing
reasons
conclude
judgment
appeals
vacated
case
remanded
proceedings
consistent
opinion
ordered
footnotes
two
counts
petitioners
alleged
fraud
merger
ultra
vires
ohio
law
petitioners
order
entered
district
two
days
summary
judgment
favor
deleting
judgment
conclusion
law
nder
provisions
section
securities
exchange
act
merger
effectuated
violation
section
act
void
deletion
apparently
made
purpose
avoiding
prejudice
question
relief
remained
open
consideration
master
light
disposition
respondents
appeal
appeals
need
consider
respondents
ask
review
conclusion
lower
courts
proxy
statement
misleading
material
respect
petitioners
naturally
raise
question
petition
certiorari
respondents
filed
since
reversal
appeals
ruling
question
dictate
affirmance
judgment
remanded
case
proceedings
determine
causation
rather
elimination
petitioners
rights
thereunder
consider
question
circumstances
american
ry
exp
langnes
green
morley
constr
maryland
cas
stern
gressman
practice
ed
appeals
ruling
causation
may
negated
proof
fairness
merger
also
rests
dubious
behavioral
assumption
justification
presuming
shareholders
every
corporation
willing
accept
every
fair
merger
offer
put
yet
presumption
implicit
opinion
appeals
gave
indication
evidence
petitioners
might
adduce
respondents
established
merger
proposal
equitable
order
show
shareholders
nevertheless
rejected
solicitation
misleading
proof
actual
reliance
thousands
individuals
acknowledged
feasible
see
jennings
marsh
securities
regulation
cases
materials
ed
reliance
nondisclosure
fact
particularly
difficult
matter
define
prove
see
loss
securities
regulation
ed
practice
therefore
objective
fairness
proposal
seemingly
determinative
liability
view
many
factors
might
lead
shareholders
prefer
current
position
owners
larger
combined
enterprise
pure
conjecture
assume
fairness
proposal
always
determinative
vote
cf
wirtz
hotel
motel
club
employees
union
cf
list
fashion
park
cir
general
time
talley
industries
cir
restatement
second
torts
tent
draft
loss
securities
regulation
ed
supp
case
misleading
aspect
solicitation
involved
failure
reveal
serious
conflict
interest
part
directors
appeals
concluded
crucial
question
determining
materiality
whether
minority
shareholders
sufficiently
alerted
board
relationship
adversary
guard
adequate
disclosure
relationship
warned
stockholders
give
careful
scrutiny
terms
merger
might
one
recommended
entirely
disinterested
board
thus
failure
make
disclosure
found
material
defect
matter
law
thwarting
informed
decision
statute
aims
regardless
whether
terms
merger
reasonable
stockholder
approved
transaction
careful
analysis
see
also
swanson
american
consumer
industries
cir
need
decide
case
whether
causation
shown
management
controls
sufficient
number
shares
approve
transaction
without
votes
minority
even
situation
management
finds
necessary
legal
practical
reasons
solicit
proxies
minority
shareholders
least
one
held
proxy
solicitation
might
sufficiently
related
merger
satisfy
causation
requirement
see
laurenzano
einbender
supp
cf
swanson
american
consumer
industries
cir
eagle
horvath
supp
globus
jaroff
supp
comment
shareholders
derivative
suit
enforce
corporate
right
action
directors
sec
rule
rev
see
hoover
allen
supp
barnett
anaconda
supp
robbins
banner
industries
supp
see
generally
loss
securities
regulation
supp
section
provides
pertinent
part
every
contract
made
violation
provision
chapter
rule
regulation
thereunder
shall
void
regards
rights
person
violation
provision
rule
regulation
shall
made
contract
regards
rights
person
party
contract
shall
acquired
right
thereunder
actual
knowledge
facts
reason
making
contract
violation
provision
rule
regulation
see
eastside
church
christ
national
plan
cir
cf
goldstein
groesbeck
cir
see
public
utility
holding
company
act
stat
investment
company
act
stat
investment
advisers
act
stat
petitioners
submitted
proxies
favor
merger
response
unlawful
solicitation
appear
language
seem
give
innocent
parties
transaction
right
rescind
proxies
clear
case
petitioners
combined
holdings
shares
rescission
affect
authorization
merger
appeals
might
modified
judgment
district
extent
referred
issue
relief
master
fed
rule
civ
proc
appeals
opinion
indicates
doubt
whether
referral
appropriate
issue
us
believe
question
reimbursement
expenses
sufficiently
close
relationship
determination
constitutes
cause
action
appropriate
decision
time
urges
consider
also
whether
petitioners
entitled
recoup
expenses
reasonably
incurred
litigation
question
relief
urged
hold
expenses
reimbursed
regardless
whether
petitioners
ultimately
successful
obtaining
significant
relief
however
question
reimbursement
future
expenses
resolved
first
instance
lower
courts
issue
relief
litigated
record
established
concerning
need
award
express
view
matter
juncture
provisions
deal
respectively
manipulation
security
prices
misleading
statements
documents
filed
commission
see
cf
note
attorney
fees
shall
ultimate
burden
lie
vand
rev
many
commentators
argued
thoroughgoing
abandonment
rule
see
ehrenzweig
reimbursement
counsel
fees
great
society
rev
kuenzel
attorney
fee
cost
litigation
iowa
rev
mccormick
counsel
fees
expenses
litigation
element
damages
rev
stoebuck
counsel
fees
included
costs
logical
development
rev
note
supra
see
trustees
greenough
central
banking
pettus
hornstein
counsel
fee
stockholder
derivative
suits
rev
even
original
fund
case
recognized
power
equity
award
fees
restricted
ability
provide
reimbursement
fund
hard
successful
plaintiff
turn
away
without
allowance
unjust
give
parties
entitled
participate
benefits
fund
unfair
advantage
worked
well
reimbursed
fund
contribute
due
proportion
expenses
fairly
incurred
make
charge
upon
fund
equitable
way
securing
contribution
trustees
greenough
see
holthusen
edward
budd
mfg
supp
runswick
floor
utah
cases
cited
infra
see
generally
hornstein
legal
therapeutics
salvage
factor
counsel
fee
awards
harv
rev
smith
recovery
plaintiff
attorney
fees
corporate
litigation
bar
bull
hartman
oatman
gold
mining
milling
greenough
coeur
lead
idaho
cf
riverside
oil
refining
lynch
allen
chase
nat
bank
misc
sup
sequel
allen
chase
nat
bank
misc
sup
cf
note
allowance
counsel
fees
fund
new
jersey
experience
rutgers
rev
see
schechtman
wolfson
cir
grant
hartman
ranch
cal
app
cal
rptr
treves
servel
del
ch
del
sup
saks
gamble
del
ch
yap
wah
yen
ki
tuk
tsen
nin
hue
haw
berger
amana
society
iowa
bosch
meeker
cooperative
light
power
eisenberg
central
zone
property
app
div
sup
aff
per
curiam
martin
foundation
app
div
sup
abrams
textile
realty
misc
sup
op
referee
long
park
brunswick
theatres
app
div
sup
aff
per
curiam
smith
supra
shareholder
suits
pecuniary
benefit
unnecessary
counsel
fee
award
stan
rev
murphy
north
american
light
power
supp
cf
hornstein
supra
justice
black
concurring
part
dissenting
part
substantially
agree
parts
ii
iii
opinion
holding
stockholders
sufficiently
proved
violation
securities
exchange
act
thus
entitled
recover
whatever
damages
suffered
result
misleading
corporate
statements
perhaps
equitable
setting
aside
merger
agree
however
appears
holding
part
iv
stockholders
hire
lawyers
prosecute
claims
case
recover
attorneys
fees
absence
valid
contractual
agreement
providing
explicit
statute
creating
right
recovery
courts
interpreters
creators
legal
rights
recover
need
recovery
attorneys
fees
effectuate
policies
act
involved
need
judgment
met
congress