blum
stenson
argued
january
decided
march
respondent
represented
attorneys
legal
aid
society
new
york
private
nonprofit
law
office
filed
civil
rights
action
federal
district
behalf
statewide
class
medicaid
recipients
complaint
challenged
certain
procedures
utilized
termination
medicaid
benefits
district
certified
class
entered
summary
judgment
appeals
affirmed
respondent
filed
district
request
award
attorney
fees
civil
rights
attorney
fees
awards
act
provides
federal
civil
rights
actions
discretion
may
allow
prevailing
party
reasonable
attorney
fee
part
costs
total
requested
fee
amounted
consisting
based
hours
work
rates
varying
per
hour
plus
bonus
compensate
complexity
case
novelty
issues
great
benefit
achieved
district
awarded
full
amount
requested
holding
hours
expended
rates
charged
view
prevailing
market
rates
reasonable
bonus
proper
quality
representation
complexity
issues
riskiness
success
great
benefit
large
class
achieved
appeals
affirmed
held
statute
legislative
history
establish
reasonable
fees
calculated
according
prevailing
market
rates
relevant
community
according
cost
providing
legal
services
regardless
whether
prevailing
party
represented
private
profitmaking
attorneys
nonprofit
legal
aid
organizations
policy
arguments
favor
standard
addressed
congress
rather
pp
district
abused
discretion
awarding
upward
adjustment
fee
case
pp
merit
argument
upward
adjustment
reasonable
fee
calculated
multiplying
reasonable
number
hours
expended
times
reasonable
hourly
fee
never
permissible
statute
legislative
history
establish
product
reasonable
hours
times
reasonable
rate
normally
provides
reasonable
attorney
fee
cases
exceptional
success
enhanced
award
may
justified
hensley
eckerhart
pp
however
respondent
failed
carry
burden
proving
upward
adjustment
necessary
determination
reasonable
fee
case
record
contains
evidence
supporting
district
conclusions
upward
adjustment
proper
complexity
litigation
novelty
issues
high
quality
representation
great
benefit
class
factors
generally
reflected
reasonableness
number
billable
hours
hourly
rates
moreover
record
justify
district
upward
adjustment
basis
riskiness
law
suit
respondent
established
hourly
rates
hours
billed
reasonable
pp
powell
delivered
opinion
unanimous
brennan
filed
concurring
opinion
marshall
joined
post
melvyn
leventhal
deputy
first
assistant
attorney
general
new
york
argued
cause
petitioner
briefs
robert
abrams
attorney
general
dennis
allee
first
assistant
attorney
general
peter
schiff
george
zuckerman
deputy
solicitor
general
marion
buchbinder
frederick
mehlman
assistant
attorneys
general
leon
silverman
argued
cause
respondent
brief
kalman
finkel
arthur
fried
john
kirklin
linda
blumkin
briefs
amici
curiae
urging
reversal
filed
solicitor
general
lee
assistant
attorney
general
mcgrath
deputy
solicitor
general
geller
deputy
assistant
attorney
general
kuhl
joshua
schwartz
william
kanter
mark
pennak
state
alabama
et
al
kenneth
eikenberry
attorney
general
washington
thomas
carr
senior
assistant
attorney
general
joined
attorneys
general
respective
follows
charles
graddick
alabama
norman
gorsuch
alaska
robert
corbin
arizona
duane
woodard
colorado
joseph
lieberman
connecticut
jim
smith
florida
michael
bowers
georgia
tany
hong
hawaii
jim
jones
idaho
neil
hartigan
illinois
linley
pearson
indiana
thomas
miller
iowa
robert
stephan
kansas
william
guste
louisiana
stephen
sachs
maryland
frank
kelley
michigan
hubert
humphrey
iii
minnesota
john
ashcroft
missouri
michael
greely
montana
paul
douglas
nebraska
brian
mckay
nevada
gregory
smith
new
hampshire
irwin
kimmelman
new
jersey
rufus
edmisten
north
carolina
robert
wefald
north
dakota
anthony
celebrezze
ohio
michael
turpen
oklahoma
david
frohnmayer
oregon
leroy
zimmerman
pennsylvania
dennis
roberts
ii
rhode
island
mark
meierhenry
south
dakota
william
leech
tennessee
david
wilkinson
utah
john
easton
vermont
gerald
baliles
virginia
chauncey
browning
west
virginia
bronson
la
follette
wisconsin
archie
mcclintock
wyoming
commonwealth
massachusetts
francis
bellotti
attorney
general
thomas
kiley
first
assistant
attorney
general
judith
yogman
carl
valvo
assistant
attorneys
general
briefs
amici
curiae
urging
affirmance
filed
alliance
justice
laura
macklin
california
coalition
welfare
rights
organizations
mary
burdick
richard
rothschild
naacp
legal
defense
educational
fund
et
al
jack
greenberg
james
nabrit
iii
charles
stephen
ralston
steven
winter
fred
fishman
robert
kapp
norman
redlich
william
robinson
norman
chachkin
richard
larson
burt
neuborne
kenneth
kimerling
joaquin
avila
morris
baller
national
education
association
et
al
michael
gottesman
robert
weinberg
julia
penny
clark
robert
chanin
lawrence
poltrock
new
york
state
bar
association
et
al
haliburton
fales
ii
oliver
hill
et
al
armand
derfner
stephen
berzon
justice
powell
delivered
opinion
title
supp
provides
federal
civil
rights
actions
discretion
may
allow
prevailing
party
reasonable
attorney
fee
part
costs
initial
estimate
reasonable
attorney
fee
properly
calculated
multiplying
number
hours
reasonably
expended
litigation
times
reasonable
hourly
rate
hensley
eckerhart
adjustments
fee
may
made
necessary
particular
case
two
issues
case
whether
congress
intended
fee
awards
nonprofit
legal
service
organizations
calculated
according
cost
prevailing
market
rates
whether
circumstances
upward
adjustment
award
based
prevailing
market
rates
appropriate
suit
brought
respondent
behalf
statewide
class
medicaid
recipients
pursuant
district
southern
district
new
york
new
york
law
one
eligible
receive
benefits
supplemental
security
income
ssi
program
et
seq
ed
supp
automatically
eligible
receive
medicaid
benefits
soc
serv
law
et
seq
mckinney
prior
suit
persons
qualified
medicaid
fashion
automatically
lost
benefits
thereafter
became
ineligible
ssi
payments
case
decided
summary
judgment
one
set
plaintiff
interrogatories
served
answered
motions
district
certified
class
rendered
final
judgment
favor
class
enjoined
prior
practice
automatic
termination
benefits
prescribed
procedural
rights
certified
class
included
ex
parte
determination
continued
eligibility
medicaid
independent
eligibility
ssi
timely
adequate
notice
termination
opportunity
hearing
stenson
blum
supp
appeals
second
circuit
affirmed
unpublished
oral
opinion
bench
affirmance
order
stenson
blum
cert
denied
respondent
subsequent
request
award
reasonable
attorney
fees
subject
present
case
throughout
litigation
respondent
represented
attorneys
legal
aid
society
new
york
private
nonprofit
law
office
november
respondent
filed
request
attorney
fees
period
december
end
litigation
three
attorneys
sought
payment
hours
work
rates
varying
per
hour
amounted
approximately
respondent
total
fee
request
however
reflected
increase
fee
brief
district
respondent
explained
increase
necessary
compensate
complexity
case
novelty
issues
great
benefit
achieved
total
requested
fee
amounted
approximately
petitioner
opposed
fee
award
grounds
rates
exorbitant
number
hours
charged
unreasonable
duplicative
bonus
improper
petitioner
submitted
evidence
support
claim
hours
rates
charged
respondent
unreasonable
instead
petitioner
rested
claim
hours
duplicative
excessive
rates
exorbitant
arguments
contained
brief
district
discretion
petitioner
requested
evidentiary
hearing
issue
reasonable
billable
hours
district
found
discussion
brief
justify
reductions
number
hours
charged
finally
petitioner
argued
bonus
requested
respondent
improper
paid
public
district
held
hours
expended
rates
charged
reasonable
also
held
fee
calculated
multiplying
number
hours
times
hourly
rates
increased
requested
quality
representation
complexity
issues
riskiness
success
great
benefit
large
class
achieved
supp
district
awarded
plaintiff
class
requested
fee
appeals
affirmed
unpublished
opinion
affirmance
order
granted
certiorari
consider
whether
proper
district
use
prevailing
market
rates
awarding
attorney
fees
nonprofit
legal
services
organizations
whether
district
abused
discretion
increasing
fee
award
based
market
rates
ii
petitioner
argues
use
prevailing
market
rates
calculate
attorney
fees
leads
exorbitant
fee
awards
provides
windfalls
civil
rights
counsel
contrary
express
intent
congress
avoid
result
petitioner
urges
require
fee
awards
calculated
according
cost
providing
legal
services
rather
according
prevailing
market
rate
solicitor
general
amicus
curiae
urges
adopt
standard
fee
awards
made
nonprofit
legal
aid
organizations
argues
market
rates
reflect
level
compensation
necessary
attract
attorneys
rates
provide
excessive
fees
nonprofit
counsel
market
rates
incorporate
operating
expenses
may
exceed
expenses
nonprofit
legal
services
organizations
include
element
profit
unnecessary
attract
nonprofit
counsel
solicitor
general
argues
fee
awards
based
market
rates
confer
unjustified
windfall
subsidy
upon
legal
services
organizations
brief
amicus
curiae
resolution
two
arguments
begins
ends
interpretation
attorney
fee
statute
civil
rights
attorney
fees
awards
act
stat
supp
authorizes
district
courts
award
reasonable
attorney
fee
prevailing
civil
rights
litigants
enacting
statute
congress
directed
attorney
fees
calculated
according
standards
currently
use
statutes
intended
amount
fees
awarded
governed
standards
prevail
types
equally
complex
federal
litigation
antitrust
cases
reduced
rights
involved
may
nonpecuniary
nature
appropriate
standards
see
johnson
georgia
highway
express
cir
correctly
applied
cases
stanford
daily
zurcher
cal
davis
county
los
angeles
cal
swann
board
education
cases
resulted
fees
adequate
attract
competent
counsel
produce
windfalls
attorneys
also
clear
legislative
history
congress
intend
calculation
fee
awards
vary
depending
whether
plaintiff
represented
private
counsel
nonprofit
legal
services
organization
citations
stanford
daily
zurcher
nd
cal
davis
county
los
angeles
epd
cd
cal
make
explicit
stanford
daily
held
must
avoid
decreasing
reasonable
fees
attorneys
conducted
litigation
act
pro
bono
publico
effort
securing
large
monetary
return
davis
held
determining
amount
fees
awarded
legally
relevant
plaintiffs
counsel
employed
privately
funded
public
interest
law
firm
interest
public
law
firms
awarded
reasonable
attorney
fees
computed
traditional
manner
counsel
perform
legal
services
otherwise
entitling
award
attorneys
fees
epd
statute
legislative
history
establish
reasonable
fees
calculated
according
prevailing
market
rates
relevant
community
regardless
whether
plaintiff
represented
private
counsel
policy
arguments
advanced
favor
standard
addressed
congress
rather
iii
address
second
question
presented
whether
upward
adjustment
fee
petitioner
argues
abuse
discretion
district
petitioner
makes
two
separate
related
arguments
first
asserts
reasonable
attorney
fee
calculated
multiplying
reasonable
number
hours
expended
times
reasonable
hourly
rate
upward
adjustment
fee
improper
alternative
argues
upward
adjustment
case
constitutes
clear
abuse
discretion
resolution
question
federal
law
turns
statute
intention
congress
look
first
statutory
language
legislative
history
statutory
language
unclear
actions
enforce
federal
civil
rights
authorizes
discretion
allow
prevailing
party
reasonable
attorney
fee
part
costs
legislative
history
explains
reasonable
attorney
fee
one
adequate
attract
competent
counsel
produce
windfalls
attorneys
noted
senate
report
identified
four
cases
calculated
correctly
reasonable
attorney
fee
hensley
eckerhart
reviewed
cases
cited
legislative
history
concluded
product
reasonable
hours
times
reasonable
rate
normally
provides
reasonable
attorney
fee
within
meaning
statute
hensley
also
recognized
cases
exceptional
success
enhanced
award
may
justified
view
recognition
enhanced
award
may
justified
cases
exceptional
success
agree
petitioner
argument
upward
adjustment
never
permissible
statute
requires
reasonable
fee
may
circumstances
basic
standard
reasonable
rates
multiplied
reasonably
expended
hours
results
fee
either
unreasonably
low
unreasonably
high
however
applicant
fee
carried
burden
showing
claimed
rate
number
hours
reasonable
resulting
product
presumed
reasonable
fee
contemplated
issue
remaining
appropriateness
upward
adjustment
fee
award
case
burden
proving
adjustment
necessary
determination
reasonable
fee
fee
applicant
record
us
contains
evidence
supporting
upward
adjustment
fees
calculated
basic
standard
reasonable
rates
times
reasonable
hours
affidavits
respondent
attorneys
claim
even
mention
entitlement
bonus
upward
revision
respondent
brief
district
merely
conclusory
fashion
upward
adjustment
fee
necessary
issues
novel
litigation
complex
results
significance
large
class
people
district
without
elaboration
accepted
conclusory
reasons
approving
upward
adjustment
supplied
additional
reasons
awarding
increase
referred
complexity
litigation
novelty
issues
high
quality
representation
great
benefit
class
riskiness
lawsuit
appeals
affirming
shed
light
thought
substantial
upward
adjustment
appropriate
single
sentence
simply
repeated
unsupported
conclusions
district
reasons
offered
district
support
upward
adjustment
withstand
examination
novelty
complexity
issues
presumably
fully
reflected
number
billable
hours
recorded
counsel
thus
warrant
upward
adjustment
fee
based
number
billable
hours
times
reasonable
hourly
rates
may
cases
course
experience
special
skill
attorney
require
expenditure
fewer
hours
counsel
normally
expected
spend
particularly
novel
complex
issue
cases
special
skill
experience
counsel
reflected
reasonableness
hourly
rates
neither
complexity
novelty
issues
therefore
appropriate
factor
determining
whether
increase
basic
fee
award
district
tried
case
best
position
conclude
quality
representation
high
view
reputation
legal
aid
society
staff
doubt
true
quality
representation
however
generally
reflected
reasonable
hourly
rate
therefore
may
justify
upward
adjustment
rare
case
fee
applicant
offers
specific
evidence
show
quality
service
rendered
superior
one
reasonably
expect
light
hourly
rates
charged
success
exceptional
see
hensley
respondent
offered
evidence
case
record
district
rationale
providing
upward
adjustment
quality
representation
clear
example
double
counting
justifying
high
hourly
rates
used
calculate
fee
award
district
explained
rates
requested
consonant
fee
awards
cases
similar
complexity
difficulty
hey
fair
view
attorneys
experience
expertise
quality
work
performed
counsel
throughout
case
high
view
considerations
find
requested
rates
per
hour
per
hour
excessive
respondent
failed
show
hourly
rates
failed
provide
reasonable
fee
quality
representation
provided
candidly
concedes
fees
awarded
attorneys
may
upper
end
market
awards
brief
respondent
absent
specific
evidence
contrary
say
rates
per
hour
per
hour
three
attorneys
fully
reflect
quality
representation
upward
adjustment
also
based
part
district
determination
ultimate
outcome
litigation
great
benefit
large
class
needy
people
explain
however
exactly
determination
affected
fee
award
results
obtained
one
factors
identified
johnson
georgia
highway
express
relevant
calculation
reasonable
attorney
fee
particularly
crucial
plaintiff
deemed
prevailing
even
though
succeeded
claims
relief
hensley
supra
fee
award
must
reduced
number
hours
spent
unsuccessful
claims
acknowledgment
results
obtained
generally
subsumed
within
factors
used
calculate
reasonable
fee
normally
provide
independent
basis
increasing
fee
award
neither
district
opinion
respondent
briefs
identified
record
evidence
shows
benefit
achieved
requires
upward
adjustment
fee
finally
district
included
among
reasons
upward
adjustment
statement
issues
presented
novel
undertaking
therefore
risky
absent
claim
affidavits
briefs
submitted
support
respondent
fee
request
seeking
adjustment
sure
prompted
statement
nowhere
affidavits
submitted
support
respondent
fee
request
brief
district
respondent
identify
risks
associated
litigation
claim
risk
nonpayment
required
upward
adjustment
provide
reasonable
fee
record
therefore
upward
adjustment
contingent
nature
litigation
unjustified
sum
reiterate
said
hensley
plaintiff
obtained
excellent
results
attorney
recover
fully
compensatory
fee
normally
encompass
hours
reasonably
expended
litigation
indeed
cases
exceptional
success
enhanced
award
may
justified
therefore
reject
petitioner
argument
upward
adjustment
attorney
fee
never
appropriate
record
us
however
respondent
established
hourly
rates
ranging
per
hour
per
hour
full
hours
billed
reasonable
resulted
charge
respondent
introduced
evidence
enhancement
necessary
provide
fair
reasonable
compensation
therefore
failed
carry
burden
justifying
entitlement
upward
adjustment
record
conclude
fee
fully
compensatory
accordingly
judgment
reversed
insofar
fee
award
increased
sum
otherwise
affirmed
ordered
footnotes
certified
class
consisted
new
york
state
residents
received
medicaid
due
eligibility
ssi
whose
medicaid
benefits
terminated
subsequent
ineligibility
ssi
without
received
one
following
ex
parte
determination
continued
eligibility
medicaid
independent
eligibility
ssi
timely
adequate
notice
termination
opportunity
hearing
stenson
blum
supp
legal
aid
society
based
new
york
city
private
nonprofit
law
office
dedicated
since
providing
legal
representation
persons
afford
lawyer
may
well
oldest
formally
organized
legal
aid
society
enjoys
wide
reputation
devotion
staff
quality
service
told
budget
civil
division
funded
nongovernmental
contributors
see
legal
aid
society
annual
report
ann
moynihan
billed
hours
minutes
per
hour
supp
graduated
law
school
outset
litigation
years
experience
practicing
attorney
app
paula
galowitz
billed
hours
minutes
per
hour
graduated
law
school
served
law
clerk
state
judge
first
year
graduation
years
experience
practicing
attorney
legal
aid
society
outset
litigation
app
arthur
fried
billed
hours
minutes
per
hour
parties
agree
hours
noted
district
table
typographical
error
graduated
law
school
served
law
clerk
district
judge
first
two
years
thereafter
years
experience
practicing
attorney
legal
aid
society
outset
litigation
app
petitioner
renew
argument
hourly
rates
claimed
respondent
counsel
line
prevailing
market
rate
private
counsel
comparable
experience
skill
reputation
petitioner
claims
hourly
rates
fee
awards
based
cost
rather
prevailing
market
rates
see
brief
petitioner
decline
consider
petitioner
argument
hours
charged
respondent
counsel
unreasonable
noted
petitioner
failed
submit
district
evidence
challenging
accuracy
reasonableness
hours
charged
see
hensley
eckerhart
facts
asserted
affidavits
submitted
respondent
counsel
therefore
waived
right
evidentiary
hearing
district
see
city
detroit
grinnell
facts
disputed
evidentiary
hearing
required
district
determines
proper
attorney
fee
award
view
trial
strategy
chose
petitioner
waived
right
challenge
district
determination
number
hours
billed
reasonable
cases
similar
complexity
petitioner
specifically
proposes
fees
based
cost
providing
legal
services
plus
appropriate
margin
profit
brief
petitioner
section
provides
relevant
part
action
proceeding
enforce
provision
sections
title
discretion
may
allow
prevailing
party
reasonable
attorney
fee
part
costs
accord
see
johnson
georgia
highway
express
customary
fee
similar
work
community
considered
stanford
daily
zurcher
nd
cal
making
fee
award
consider
value
attorney
time
light
billing
rates
davis
county
los
angeles
epd
cd
cal
fee
award
calculated
multiplying
number
hours
expended
times
normal
hourly
rates
attorneys
like
skill
experience
swann
board
education
wdnc
fee
award
calculated
reference
hourly
rates
generally
charged
federal
litigation
congress
legislating
light
experience
enacted
fee
statute
time
courts
familiar
calculating
fee
awards
civil
litigation
title
vii
civil
rights
act
judicially
established
private
attorney
general
theory
prevailed
prior
decision
alyeska
pipeline
service
wilderness
society
none
cases
decided
time
adopted
approach
calculating
fees
reference
market
rate
uniform
see
waters
wisconsin
steel
works
cert
denied
evans
sheraton
park
hotel
app
tillman
recreation
kerr
screen
extras
guild
cert
denied
sub
nom
perkins
screen
extras
guild
recognize
course
determining
appropriate
market
rate
services
lawyer
inherently
difficult
market
prices
commodities
services
determined
supply
demand
traditional
sense
thing
prevailing
market
rate
service
lawyers
particular
community
type
services
rendered
lawyers
well
experience
skill
reputation
varies
extensively
even
within
law
firm
accordingly
hourly
rates
lawyers
private
practice
also
vary
widely
fees
charged
often
based
product
hours
devoted
representation
multiplied
lawyer
customary
rate
fee
usually
discussed
client
may
negotiated
client
pays
whether
wins
loses
fee
determination
made
entirely
different
setting
negotiation
even
discussion
prevailing
client
fee
found
reasonable
paid
losing
party
nevertheless
shown
text
critical
inquiry
determining
reasonableness
generally
recognized
appropriate
hourly
rate
rates
charged
private
representations
may
afford
relevant
comparisons
seeking
basis
standard
courts
properly
required
prevailing
attorneys
justify
reasonableness
requested
rate
rates
inform
assist
exercise
discretion
burden
fee
applicant
produce
satisfactory
evidence
addition
attorney
affidavits
requested
rates
line
prevailing
community
similar
services
lawyers
reasonably
comparable
skill
experience
reputation
rate
determined
way
normally
deemed
reasonable
referred
convenience
prevailing
market
rate
district
characterized
increase
bonus
appeals
brief
opinion
spoke
upward
adjustment
think
latter
characterization
fairer
use
specifically
senate
report
expressly
approved
factors
appeals
fifth
circuit
used
calculating
fee
award
johnson
georgia
highway
express
identified
three
cases
correctly
applied
factors
see
supra
another
point
hensley
observed
product
reasonable
hours
times
reasonable
rate
end
inquiry
remain
considerations
may
lead
district
adjust
fee
upward
downward
including
important
factor
results
obtained
respondent
counsel
admirable
records
scholars
two
valuable
clerkship
experience
also
specializing
social
security
type
claims
government
yet
none
outset
suit
december
years
experience
practicing
lawyers
see
supra
term
experience
normally
used
quite
limited
believe
number
persons
benefited
consideration
significance
calculating
fees
unlike
calculation
attorney
fees
common
fund
doctrine
reasonable
fee
based
percentage
fund
bestowed
class
reasonable
fee
reflects
amount
attorney
time
reasonably
expended
litigation
presumably
counsel
spend
much
time
diligent
litigating
case
benefits
small
class
people
indeed
protecting
civil
rights
single
individual
occasion
case
consider
whether
risk
prevailing
party
case
therefore
entitled
award
attorney
fees
one
adversary
may
ever
justify
upward
fee
adjustment
part
ii
opinion
declined
draw
distinction
respect
use
market
rates
profit
nonprofit
law
offices
similarly
rare
case
upward
adjustment
presumptively
reasonable
fee
rate
times
hours
appropriate
draw
distinction
profit
nonprofit
law
offices
stated
hensley
request
attorney
fees
result
second
major
litigation
hensley
parties
civil
rights
litigation
particular
make
conscientious
effort
fee
award
made
resolve
differences
district
expressly
empowered
exercise
discretion
determining
whether
award
made
reasonableness
intimate
knowledge
litigation
responsibility
encourage
agreement
justice
brennan
justice
marshall
joins
concurring
join
opinion
write
separately
reaffirm
view
congress
clearly
indicated
risk
prevailing
therefore
risk
recovering
attorney
fees
proper
basis
district
may
award
upward
adjustment
otherwise
compensatory
fee
see
hensley
eckerhart
brennan
concurring
part
dissenting
part
although
leaves
question
unresolved
see
ante
legislative
history
always
controlled
interpretation
proves
determinative
issues
addressed
today
decision
also
determines
whether
upward
adjustment
compensate
risk
nonpayment
may
justified
particular
congress
referred
johnson
georgia
highway
express
appropriate
standards
applied
courts
awarding
attorney
fees
see
ante
whether
fee
fixed
contingent
emphasis
original
consequently
recognized
congress
relevant
consideration
setting
reasonable
fee
moreover
congress
explicitly
cited
stanford
daily
zurcher
nd
cal
subsequently
aff
rev
grounds
one
several
cases
correctly
applied
appropriate
standards
stanford
daily
district
concluded
may
increase
fees
award
obtained
multiplying
number
hours
average
billing
rate
reflect
fact
attorneys
compensation
least
part
contingent
nature
clear
therefore
congress
authorized
district
courts
award
upward
adjustments
compensate
contingent
nature
success
thus
risk
nonpayment
particular
case
indeed
allowing
district
courts
award
upward
adjustments
entirely
consistent
approach
hourly
rates
today
reaffirmed
lawyers
operating
marketplace
expected
charge
higher
hourly
rate
compensation
contingent
success
promptly
paid
irrespective
whether
win
lose
similarly
necessary
account
risk
fee
awards
either
increasing
appropriate
hourly
rate
enhancing
fee
otherwise
calculated
use
hourly
rate
reflect
risk
prevailing
ensure
fees
consistent
prevailing
market
rates
see
ante
nonprofit
legal
service
organizations
private
attorneys
treated
similarly
see
ante
attorney
fees
awarded
adequate
attract
competent
counsel
represent
clients
civil
rights
grievances
contingency
adjustments
confused
contingency
fee
arrangements
commonly
entered
private
attorneys
representing
plaintiffs
civil
litigation
upward
adjustment
compensate
risk
nonpayment
entirely
unrelated
contingent
fee
arrangements
typical
plaintiffs
tort
representation
tort
suits
attorney
might
receive
whatever
amount
plaintiff
recovers
cases
therefore
fee
directly
proportional
recovery
case
contingency
adjustments
kind
describe
herein
th
contingency
adjustment
percentage
increase
amount
obtained
multiplying
hours
expended
hourly
rate
designed
reflect
risk
fee
obtained
copeland
app
en
banc