friends
earth
et
al
laidlaw
environmental
services
toc
argued
october
decided
january
laidlaw
environmental
services
toc
bought
facility
roebuck
south
carolina
included
wastewater
treatment
plant
shortly
thereafter
south
carolina
department
health
environmental
control
dhec
acting
clean
water
act
act
granted
laidlaw
national
pollutant
discharge
elimination
system
npdes
permit
permit
authorized
laidlaw
discharge
treated
water
north
tyger
river
limited
among
things
discharge
pollutants
waterway
laidlaw
began
discharge
various
pollutants
waterway
discharges
particularly
mercury
extremely
toxic
pollutant
repeatedly
exceeded
limits
set
permit
april
friends
earth
citizens
local
environmental
action
network
referred
collectively
along
later
joined
sierra
club
foe
notified
laidlaw
intention
file
citizen
suit
act
expiration
requisite
notice
period
dhec
acceded
laidlaw
request
file
lawsuit
company
last
day
foe
notice
period
expired
dhec
laidlaw
reached
settlement
requiring
laidlaw
pay
civil
penalties
make
every
effort
comply
permit
obligations
june
foe
filed
citizen
suit
laidlaw
alleging
noncompliance
npdes
permit
seeking
declaratory
injunctive
relief
award
civil
penalties
laidlaw
moved
summary
judgment
ground
foe
lacked
article
iii
standing
bring
lawsuit
examining
affidavits
deposition
testimony
members
plaintiff
organizations
district
denied
motion
finding
plaintiffs
standing
district
also
denied
laidlaw
motion
dismiss
ground
citizen
suit
barred
dhec
prior
action
company
foe
initiated
suit
district
rendered
judgment
january
laidlaw
violated
mercury
discharge
limitation
permit
times
committed
monitoring
reporting
violations
issuing
judgment
district
found
laidlaw
gained
total
economic
benefit
result
extended
period
noncompliance
permit
mercury
discharge
limit
nevertheless
concluded
civil
penalty
appropriate
particular
district
found
judgment
total
deterrent
effect
adequate
forestall
future
violations
given
laidlaw
reimburse
plaintiffs
significant
amount
legal
fees
incurred
significant
legal
expenses
declined
order
injunctive
relief
laidlaw
lawsuit
began
achieved
substantial
compliance
terms
permit
foe
appealed
amount
district
civil
penalty
judgment
appeal
denial
declaratory
injunctive
relief
fourth
circuit
vacated
district
order
remanded
instructions
dismiss
action
assuming
arguendo
foe
initially
standing
appellate
held
case
become
moot
laidlaw
complied
terms
permit
plaintiffs
failed
appeal
denial
equitable
relief
citing
steel
citizens
better
environment
reasoned
remedy
currently
available
foe
civil
penalties
payable
government
redress
injury
foe
suffered
added
foe
failure
obtain
relief
merits
precluded
recovery
attorneys
fees
costs
award
available
prevailing
substantially
prevailing
party
according
laidlaw
entire
roebuck
facility
since
permanently
closed
dismantled
put
sale
discharges
facility
permanently
ceased
held
fourth
circuit
erred
concluding
citizen
suitor
claim
civil
penalties
must
dismissed
moot
defendant
commencement
litigation
come
compliance
npdes
permit
pp
constitution
limitation
federal
judicial
authority
art
iii
underpins
standing
mootness
doctrine
two
inquiries
differ
crucial
respects
fourth
circuit
persuaded
case
become
moot
simply
assumed
foe
initial
standing
see
arizonans
official
english
arizona
concludes
appeals
erred
mootness
obligation
assure
foe
article
iii
standing
outset
litigation
pp
foe
article
iii
standing
bring
action
held
satisfy
article
iii
standing
requirements
plaintiff
must
show
injury
fact
causation
redressability
lujan
defenders
wildlife
association
standing
bring
suit
behalf
members
members
standing
sue
right
interests
stake
germane
organization
purpose
neither
claim
asserted
relief
requested
requires
individual
members
participation
lawsuit
hunt
washington
state
apple
advertising
relevant
showing
article
iii
standing
injury
environment
injury
plaintiff
insist
former
rather
latter
raise
standing
hurdle
higher
necessary
showing
success
merits
citizen
npdes
permit
enforcement
suit
injury
fact
adequately
documented
affidavits
testimony
foe
members
asserting
laidlaw
pollutant
discharges
affiants
reasonable
concerns
effects
discharges
directly
affected
affiants
recreational
aesthetic
economic
interests
see
sierra
club
morton
submissions
present
dispositively
mere
general
averments
conclusory
allegations
found
inadequate
lujan
national
wildlife
federation
day
intentions
visit
endangered
species
halfway
around
world
held
insufficient
defenders
wildlife
pp
laidlaw
argues
foe
lacked
standing
seek
civil
penalties
payable
government
penalties
offer
redress
citizen
plaintiffs
plaintiff
injured
threatened
injury
due
illegal
conduct
ongoing
time
suit
sanction
effectively
abates
conduct
prevents
recurrence
provides
form
redress
civil
penalties
fit
description
insofar
encourage
defendants
discontinue
current
violations
deter
future
ones
afford
redress
citizen
plaintiffs
injured
threatened
injury
result
ongoing
unlawful
conduct
need
explore
outer
limits
principle
civil
penalties
provide
sufficient
deterrence
support
redressability
civil
penalties
sought
carried
deterrent
effect
made
likely
opposed
merely
speculative
penalties
redress
foe
injuries
district
reasonably
found
assessed
penalty
steel
co
contrary
case
held
private
plaintiffs
may
sue
assess
penalties
wholly
past
violations
address
standing
seek
penalties
violations
ongoing
time
complaint
continue
future
undeterred
see
pp
foe
civil
penalties
claim
automatically
become
moot
company
came
substantial
compliance
permit
defendant
voluntary
cessation
challenged
practice
ordinarily
deprive
federal
power
determine
legality
practice
city
mesquite
aladdin
castle
courts
compelled
leave
defendant
free
return
old
ways
thus
standard
determining
whether
case
mooted
defendant
voluntary
conduct
stringent
case
might
become
moot
subsequent
events
make
absolutely
clear
allegedly
wrongful
behavior
reasonably
expected
recur
concentrated
phosphate
export
heavy
burden
persuading
challenged
conduct
reasonably
expected
recur
lies
party
asserting
mootness
ibid
appeals
incorrectly
conflated
case
law
initial
standing
see
steel
case
law
mootness
see
city
mesquite
confusion
understandable
given
repeated
description
mootness
doctrine
standing
set
time
frame
requisite
personal
interest
must
exist
commencement
litigation
standing
must
continue
throughout
existence
mootness
arizonans
careful
reflection
however
reveals
description
mootness
comprehensive
example
defendant
claiming
voluntary
compliance
moots
case
bears
formidable
burden
contrast
plaintiff
burden
lawsuit
brought
force
compliance
establish
standing
demonstrating
unchecked
litigation
defendant
allegedly
wrongful
behavior
likely
occur
continue
threatened
injury
certainly
impending
whitmore
arkansas
plain
lesson
circumstances
prospect
defendant
engage
resume
harmful
conduct
may
speculative
support
standing
speculative
overcome
mootness
mootness
simply
standing
set
time
frame
exception
mootness
acts
capable
repetition
yet
evading
review
exist
see
olmstead
standing
admits
similar
exception
plaintiff
lacks
standing
time
action
commences
fact
dispute
capable
repetition
yet
evading
review
entitle
complainant
federal
judicial
forum
see
steel
standing
doctrine
ensures
among
things
resources
federal
courts
devoted
disputes
parties
concrete
stake
yet
time
mootness
issue
abandonment
case
may
prove
wasteful
frugal
courts
license
retain
jurisdiction
cases
one
parties
plainly
lacks
continuing
interest
see
arizonans
foregoing
examples
highlight
important
difference
two
doctrines
see
generally
honig
doe
rehnquist
concurring
laidlaw
argument
foe
doomed
civil
penalty
claim
mootness
failing
appeal
denial
injunctive
relief
misconceives
statutory
scheme
district
discretion
determine
form
relief
best
suited
abate
current
violations
deter
future
ones
see
weinberger
denial
injunctive
relief
necessarily
mean
district
concluded
prospect
future
violations
deter
indeed
meant
thing
case
district
denied
injunctive
relief
expressly
based
award
civil
penalties
need
deterrence
district
properly
may
conclude
injunction
intrusive
entail
continuing
burdensome
superintendence
permit
holder
activities
federal
see
city
mesquite
laidlaw
permit
compliance
facility
closure
might
moot
case
one
event
made
absolutely
clear
violations
reasonably
expected
recur
concentrated
phosphate
export
assn
disputed
factual
matters
aired
lower
courts
remain
open
consideration
remand
pp
resolve
foe
argument
entitled
attorneys
fees
theory
plaintiff
prevailing
party
catalyst
triggered
favorable
outcome
although
circuits
divided
continuing
validity
catalyst
theory
following
farrar
hobby
premature
address
question
district
stayed
time
petition
attorneys
fees
time
appeal
expired
appeal
resolved
thus
fourth
circuit
addressed
availability
counsel
fees
order
either
denying
awarding
fees
district
address
first
instance
request
reimbursement
costs
including
fees
pp
reversed
remanded
ginsburg
delivered
opinion
rehnquist
stevens
kennedy
souter
breyer
joined
stevens
kennedy
filed
concurring
opinions
scalia
filed
dissenting
opinion
thomas
joined
friends
earth
incorporated
et
al
petitioners
laidlaw
environmental
services
toc
writ
certiorari
appeals
fourth
circuit
january
justice
ginsburg
delivered
opinion
case
presents
important
question
concerning
operation
provisions
clean
water
act
congress
authorized
federal
district
courts
entertain
clean
water
act
suits
initiated
person
persons
interest
may
adversely
affected
impel
future
compliance
act
district
may
prescribe
injunctive
relief
suit
additionally
alternatively
may
impose
civil
penalties
payable
treasury
clean
water
act
citizen
suit
us
district
determined
injunctive
relief
inappropriate
defendant
institution
litigation
achieved
substantial
compliance
terms
discharge
permit
supp
sc
however
assess
civil
penalty
total
deterrent
effect
penalty
adequate
forestall
future
violations
reasoned
taking
account
defendant
required
reimburse
plaintiffs
significant
amount
legal
fees
incurred
significant
legal
expenses
appeals
vacated
district
order
case
became
moot
appellate
declared
defendant
fully
complied
terms
permit
plaintiff
failed
appeal
denial
equitable
relief
ivil
penalties
payable
government
appeals
stated
redress
injury
plaintiffs
suffered
attorneys
fees
order
appeals
noted
absent
relief
merits
plaintiffs
qualify
prevailing
parties
reverse
judgment
appeals
appellate
erred
concluding
citizen
suitor
claim
civil
penalties
must
dismissed
moot
defendant
albeit
commencement
litigation
come
compliance
directing
dismissal
suit
grounds
mootness
appeals
incorrectly
conflated
case
law
initial
standing
bring
suit
see
steel
citizens
better
environment
case
law
mootness
see
city
mesquite
aladdin
castle
defendant
voluntary
cessation
allegedly
unlawful
conduct
ordinarily
suffice
moot
case
appeals
also
misperceived
remedial
potential
civil
penalties
penalties
may
serve
alternative
injunction
deter
future
violations
thereby
redress
injuries
prompted
citizen
suitor
commence
litigation
congress
enacted
clean
water
act
act
also
known
federal
water
pollution
control
act
stat
amended
et
seq
section
act
provides
issuance
administrator
environmental
protection
agency
epa
authorized
national
pollutant
discharge
elimination
system
npdes
permits
npdes
permits
impose
limitations
discharge
pollutants
establish
related
monitoring
reporting
requirements
order
improve
cleanliness
safety
nation
waters
noncompliance
permit
constitutes
violation
act
act
suit
enforce
limitation
npdes
permit
may
brought
citizen
defined
person
persons
interest
may
adversely
affected
sixty
days
initiating
citizen
suit
however
plaintiff
must
give
notice
alleged
violation
epa
state
alleged
violation
occurred
alleged
violator
purpose
notice
alleged
violator
give
opportunity
bring
complete
compliance
act
thus
render
unnecessary
citizen
suit
gwaltney
smithfield
chesapeake
bay
foundation
accordingly
held
citizens
lack
statutory
standing
sue
violations
ceased
time
complaint
filed
act
also
bars
citizen
suing
epa
state
already
commenced
diligently
prosecuting
enforcement
action
act
authorizes
district
courts
proceedings
enter
injunctions
assess
civil
penalties
payable
treasury
determining
amount
civil
penalty
district
must
take
account
seriousness
violation
violations
economic
benefit
resulting
violation
history
violations
efforts
comply
applicable
requirements
economic
impact
penalty
violator
matters
justice
may
require
addition
may
award
costs
litigation
including
reasonable
attorney
expert
witness
fees
prevailing
substantially
prevailing
party
whenever
determines
award
appropriate
laidlaw
environmental
services
toc
bought
hazardous
waste
incinerator
facility
roebuck
south
carolina
included
wastewater
treatment
plant
company
since
changed
name
roebuck
simplicity
refer
laidlaw
throughout
shortly
laidlaw
acquired
facility
south
carolina
department
health
environmental
control
dhec
acting
granted
laidlaw
npdes
permit
authorizing
company
discharge
treated
water
north
tyger
river
permit
became
effective
january
placed
limits
laidlaw
discharge
several
pollutants
river
including
particular
relevance
case
mercury
extremely
toxic
pollutant
permit
also
regulated
flow
temperature
toxicity
ph
effluent
facility
imposed
monitoring
reporting
obligations
received
permit
laidlaw
began
discharge
various
pollutants
waterway
repeatedly
laidlaw
discharges
exceeded
limits
set
permit
particular
despite
experimenting
several
technological
fixes
laidlaw
consistently
failed
meet
permit
stringent
ppb
parts
per
billion
daily
average
limit
mercury
discharges
district
later
found
laidlaw
violated
mercury
limits
occasions
april
friends
earth
foe
citizens
local
environmental
action
network
clean
referred
collectively
opinion
together
later
joined
sierra
club
foe
took
preliminary
step
necessary
institution
litigation
sent
letter
laidlaw
notifying
company
intention
file
citizen
suit
act
expiration
requisite
notice
period
june
laidlaw
lawyer
contacted
dhec
ask
whether
dhec
consider
filing
lawsuit
laidlaw
district
later
found
laidlaw
reason
requesting
dhec
file
lawsuit
bar
foe
proposed
citizen
suit
operation
supp
sc
dhec
agreed
file
lawsuit
laidlaw
company
lawyer
drafted
complaint
dhec
paid
filing
fee
june
last
day
foe
notice
period
expired
dhec
laidlaw
reached
settlement
requiring
laidlaw
pay
civil
penalties
make
every
comply
permit
obligations
june
foe
filed
citizen
suit
laidlaw
act
alleging
noncompliance
npdes
permit
seeking
declaratory
injunctive
relief
award
civil
penalties
laidlaw
moved
summary
judgment
ground
foe
failed
present
evidence
demonstrating
injury
fact
therefore
lacked
article
iii
standing
bring
lawsuit
record
doc
opposition
motion
foe
submitted
affidavits
deposition
testimony
members
plaintiff
organizations
record
doc
exhs
record
district
also
included
affidavits
organizations
members
submitted
foe
support
earlier
motion
preliminary
injunctive
relief
record
doc
exhs
examining
evidence
district
denied
laidlaw
summary
judgment
motion
finding
albeit
slimmest
margins
foe
standing
bring
suit
app
pp
tr
hearing
june
laidlaw
also
moved
dismiss
action
ground
citizen
suit
barred
dhec
prior
action
company
appearing
amicus
curiae
joined
foe
opposing
motion
extensive
analysis
settlement
circumstances
reached
district
held
dhec
action
laidlaw
diligently
prosecuted
consequently
allowed
foe
citizen
suit
proceed
record
indicates
foe
initiated
suit
district
rendered
judgment
laidlaw
violated
mercury
discharge
limitation
permit
times
district
also
found
laidlaw
committed
monitoring
reporting
violations
period
last
recorded
mercury
discharge
violation
occurred
january
long
complaint
filed
two
years
judgment
rendered
id
january
district
issued
judgment
supp
sc
found
laidlaw
gained
total
economic
benefit
result
extended
period
noncompliance
mercury
discharge
limit
permit
id
concluded
however
civil
penalty
adequate
light
guiding
factors
listed
particular
district
stated
lesser
penalty
appropriate
taking
account
judgment
total
deterrent
effect
reaching
determination
considered
laidlaw
required
reimburse
plaintiffs
significant
amount
legal
fees
declined
grant
foe
request
injunctive
relief
stating
injunction
inappropriate
laidlaw
substantial
compliance
parameters
npdes
permit
since
least
august
foe
appealed
district
civil
penalty
judgment
arguing
penalty
inadequate
appeal
denial
declaratory
injunctive
relief
laidlaw
arguing
among
things
foe
lacked
standing
bring
suit
dhec
action
qualified
diligent
prosecution
precluding
foe
litigation
continued
participate
amicus
curiae
support
foe
july
appeals
fourth
circuit
issued
judgment
appeals
assumed
without
deciding
foe
initially
standing
bring
action
went
hold
case
become
moot
appellate
stated
first
elements
article
iii
standing
injury
causation
redressability
must
persist
every
stage
review
else
action
becomes
moot
citing
decision
steel
appeals
reasoned
case
become
moot
remedy
currently
available
foe
civil
penalties
payable
government
redress
injury
foe
suffered
therefore
vacated
district
order
remanded
instructions
dismiss
action
appeals
added
foe
failure
obtain
relief
merits
claims
precludes
recovery
attorneys
fees
litigation
costs
award
available
prevailing
substantially
prevailing
party
quoting
according
laidlaw
appeals
issued
decision
granted
certiorari
entire
incinerator
facility
roebuck
permanently
closed
dismantled
put
sale
discharges
facility
permanently
ceased
respondent
suggestion
mootness
granted
certiorari
resolve
inconsistency
fourth
circuit
decision
case
decisions
several
courts
appeals
held
defendant
compliance
permit
commencement
litigation
moot
claims
civil
penalties
act
see
atlantic
legal
foundation
stroh
die
casting
cert
denied
natural
resources
defense
council
texaco
rfg
atlantic
legal
foundation
pan
american
tanning
atlantic
legal
foundation
tyson
foods
ii
constitution
limitation
federal
judicial
authority
art
iii
underpins
standing
mootness
jurisprudence
two
inquiries
differ
respects
critical
proper
resolution
case
address
separately
appeals
persuaded
case
become
moot
held
simply
assumed
without
deciding
foe
initial
standing
see
arizonans
official
english
arizona
may
assume
without
deciding
standing
exists
order
analyze
mootness
hold
appeals
erred
declaring
case
moot
obligation
assure
foe
article
iii
standing
outset
litigation
therefore
address
question
standing
turning
mootness
lujan
defenders
wildlife
held
satisfy
article
iii
standing
requirements
plaintiff
must
show
suffered
injury
fact
concrete
particularized
actual
imminent
conjectural
hypothetical
injury
fairly
traceable
challenged
action
defendant
likely
opposed
merely
speculative
injury
redressed
favorable
decision
association
standing
bring
suit
behalf
members
members
otherwise
standing
sue
right
interests
stake
germane
organization
purpose
neither
claim
asserted
relief
requested
requires
participation
individual
members
lawsuit
hunt
washington
state
apple
advertising
laidlaw
contends
first
foe
lacked
standing
outset
even
seek
injunctive
relief
plaintiff
organizations
failed
show
members
sustained
faced
threat
injury
fact
laidlaw
activities
support
contention
laidlaw
points
district
finding
made
course
setting
penalty
amount
demonstrated
proof
harm
environment
laidlaw
mercury
discharge
violations
see
also
ibid
npdes
permit
violations
issue
citizen
suit
result
health
risk
environmental
relevant
showing
purposes
article
iii
standing
however
injury
environment
injury
plaintiff
insist
upon
former
rather
latter
part
standing
inquiry
dissent
essence
post
raise
standing
hurdle
higher
necessary
showing
success
merits
action
alleging
noncompliance
npdes
permit
focusing
properly
injury
plaintiff
district
found
foe
demonstrated
sufficient
injury
establish
standing
app
pp
tr
hearing
june
example
foe
member
kenneth
lee
curtis
averred
affidavits
lived
laidlaw
facility
occasionally
drove
north
tyger
river
looked
smelled
polluted
like
fish
camp
swim
picnic
near
river
miles
downstream
facility
teenager
concerned
water
polluted
laidlaw
discharges
record
doc
exhs
curtis
reaffirmed
statements
extensive
deposition
testimony
example
testified
like
fish
river
specific
spot
used
boy
concerns
laidlaw
discharges
ibid
exh
exh
members
presented
evidence
similar
effect
clean
member
angela
patterson
attested
lived
two
miles
facility
laidlaw
operated
facility
picnicked
walked
birdwatched
waded
along
north
tyger
river
natural
beauty
area
longer
engaged
activities
near
river
concerned
harmful
effects
discharged
pollutants
husband
like
purchase
home
near
river
intend
part
laidlaw
discharges
record
doc
exh
clean
member
judy
pruitt
averred
lived
mile
laidlaw
facility
like
fish
hike
picnic
along
north
tyger
river
refrained
activities
discharges
ibid
exh
foe
member
linda
moore
attested
lived
miles
roebuck
use
north
tyger
river
south
roebuck
land
surrounding
recreational
purposes
concerned
water
contained
harmful
pollutants
record
doc
exhs
deposition
moore
testified
length
hike
picnic
camp
swim
boat
drive
near
river
concerns
illegal
discharges
ibid
exh
clean
member
gail
lee
attested
home
near
laidlaw
facility
lower
value
similar
homes
located
facility
believed
pollutant
discharges
accounted
discrepancy
record
doc
exh
sierra
club
member
norman
sharp
averred
canoed
approximately
miles
downstream
laidlaw
facility
like
canoe
north
tyger
river
closer
laidlaw
discharge
point
concerned
water
contained
harmful
pollutants
ibid
exh
sworn
statements
district
determined
adequately
documented
injury
fact
held
environmental
plaintiffs
adequately
allege
injury
fact
aver
use
affected
area
persons
aesthetic
recreational
values
area
lessened
challenged
activity
sierra
club
morton
see
also
defenders
wildlife
course
desire
use
observe
animal
species
even
purely
esthetic
purposes
undeniably
cognizable
interest
purposes
decision
lujan
national
wildlife
federation
contrary
case
environmental
organization
assailed
bureau
land
management
land
withdrawal
review
program
program
covering
millions
acres
alleging
program
illegally
opened
public
lands
mining
activities
defendants
moved
summary
judgment
challenging
plaintiff
organization
standing
initiate
action
administrative
procedure
act
held
plaintiff
survive
summary
judgment
motion
merely
offering
averments
state
one
organization
members
uses
unspecified
portions
immense
tract
territory
portions
mining
activity
occurred
probably
occur
virtue
governmental
action
contrast
affidavits
testimony
presented
foe
case
assert
laidlaw
discharges
affiant
members
reasonable
concerns
effects
discharges
directly
affected
affiants
recreational
aesthetic
economic
interests
submissions
present
dispositively
mere
general
averments
conclusory
allegations
found
inadequate
national
wildlife
federation
affiants
conditional
statements
use
nearby
north
tyger
river
recreation
laidlaw
discharging
pollutants
equated
speculative
day
intentions
visit
endangered
species
halfway
around
world
held
insufficient
show
injury
fact
defenders
wildlife
los
angeles
lyons
relied
dissent
post
weigh
standing
case
lyons
held
plaintiff
lacked
standing
seek
injunction
enforcement
police
chokehold
policy
credibly
allege
faced
realistic
threat
policy
lyons
cited
dissent
noted
reasonableness
lyons
fear
dependent
upon
likelihood
recurrence
allegedly
unlawful
conduct
subjective
apprehensions
recurrence
even
take
place
enough
support
standing
id
contrast
undisputed
laidlaw
unlawful
conduct
discharging
pollutants
excess
permit
limits
occurring
time
complaint
filed
lyons
subjective
issue
reasonableness
fear
led
affiants
respond
concededly
ongoing
conduct
refraining
use
north
tyger
river
surrounding
areas
unlike
dissent
post
see
nothing
improbable
proposition
company
continuous
pervasive
illegal
discharges
pollutants
river
cause
nearby
residents
curtail
recreational
use
waterway
subject
economic
aesthetic
harms
proposition
entirely
reasonable
district
found
true
case
enough
injury
fact
laidlaw
argues
next
even
foe
standing
seek
injunctive
relief
lacked
standing
seek
civil
penalties
asserted
defect
injury
redressability
civil
penalties
offer
redress
private
plaintiffs
laidlaw
argues
paid
government
therefore
citizen
plaintiff
never
standing
seek
laidlaw
right
insist
plaintiff
must
demonstrate
standing
separately
form
relief
sought
see
lyons
notwithstanding
fact
plaintiff
standing
pursue
damages
lacked
standing
pursue
injunctive
relief
see
also
lewis
casey
tanding
dispensed
wrong
maintain
citizen
plaintiffs
facing
ongoing
violations
never
standing
seek
civil
penalties
recognized
numerous
occasions
civil
penalties
deterrent
effect
hudson
see
also
department
revenue
mont
kurth
ranch
specifically
congress
found
civil
penalties
clean
water
act
cases
promote
immediate
compliance
limiting
defendant
economic
incentive
delay
attainment
permit
limits
also
deter
future
violations
congressional
determination
warrants
judicial
attention
respect
legislative
history
act
reveals
congress
wanted
district
consider
need
retribution
deterrence
addition
restitution
imposed
civil
penalties
district
may
seek
deter
future
violations
basing
penalty
economic
impact
tull
scarcely
doubted
plaintiff
injured
faces
threat
future
injury
due
illegal
conduct
ongoing
time
suit
sanction
effectively
abates
conduct
prevents
recurrence
provides
form
redress
civil
penalties
fit
description
extent
encourage
defendants
discontinue
current
violations
deter
committing
future
ones
afford
redress
citizen
plaintiffs
injured
threatened
injury
consequence
ongoing
unlawful
conduct
dissent
argues
availability
rather
imposition
civil
penalties
deters
particular
polluter
continuing
pollute
post
argument
misses
mark
two
ways
first
overlooks
interdependence
availability
imposition
threat
deterrent
value
unless
credible
carried
second
reasonable
congress
conclude
actual
award
civil
penalties
fact
bring
significant
quantum
deterrence
achieved
mere
prospect
penalties
polluter
may
may
dissuaded
existence
remedy
books
defendant
hit
pocketbook
surely
think
twice
polluting
recognize
may
point
deterrent
effect
claim
civil
penalties
becomes
insubstantial
remote
support
citizen
standing
fact
vanishing
point
easy
ascertain
detract
deterrent
power
penalties
ordinary
case
justice
frankfurter
observations
made
different
context
nearly
years
ago
hold
true
well
effectuate
policy
adaptation
means
legitimately
sought
ends
one
intractable
legislative
problems
whether
proscribed
conduct
deterred
qui
tam
action
triple
damages
injunction
criminal
prosecution
merely
defense
actions
contract
remedies
combination
matter
within
legislature
range
choice
judgment
deterrent
effect
various
weapons
armory
law
lay
little
claim
scientific
basis
tigner
texas
case
need
explore
outer
limits
principle
civil
penalties
provide
sufficient
deterrence
support
redressability
civil
penalties
sought
foe
carried
deterrent
effect
made
likely
opposed
merely
speculative
penalties
redress
foe
injuries
abating
current
violations
preventing
future
ones
district
reasonably
found
assessed
penalty
laidlaw
contends
reasoning
decision
steel
co
directs
conclusion
citizen
plaintiffs
standing
seek
civil
penalties
act
disagree
steel
established
citizen
suitors
lack
standing
seek
civil
penalties
violations
abated
time
suit
specifically
noted
case
allegation
complaint
continuing
imminent
violation
basis
allegation
appeared
exist
see
also
gwaltney
harm
sought
addressed
citizen
suit
lies
present
future
past
short
steel
held
private
plaintiffs
unlike
federal
government
may
sue
assess
penalties
wholly
past
violations
decision
case
reach
issue
standing
seek
penalties
violations
ongoing
time
complaint
continue
future
undeterred
satisfied
foe
standing
article
iii
bring
action
turn
question
mootness
conceivable
basis
finding
mootness
case
laidlaw
voluntary
conduct
either
achievement
august
substantial
compliance
npdes
permit
recent
shutdown
roebuck
facility
well
settled
defendant
voluntary
cessation
challenged
practice
deprive
federal
power
determine
legality
practice
city
mesquite
courts
compelled
leave
defendant
free
return
old
ways
citing
grant
accordance
principle
standard
announced
determining
whether
case
mooted
defendant
voluntary
conduct
stringent
case
might
become
moot
subsequent
events
made
absolutely
clear
allegedly
wrongful
behavior
reasonably
expected
recur
concentrated
phosphate
export
heavy
burden
persua
ding
challenged
conduct
reasonably
expected
start
lies
party
asserting
mootness
ibid
appeals
justified
mootness
disposition
reference
steel
held
citizen
plaintiffs
lack
standing
seek
civil
penalties
wholly
past
violations
relying
steel
appeals
confused
mootness
standing
confusion
understandable
given
repeated
statements
doctrine
mootness
described
doctrine
standing
set
time
frame
requisite
personal
interest
must
exist
commencement
litigation
standing
must
continue
throughout
existence
mootness
arizonans
official
english
quoting
parole
geraghty
turn
quoting
monaghan
constitutional
adjudication
yale
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
careful
reflection
exceptions
mootness
however
reveals
description
mootness
standing
set
time
frame
comprehensive
noted
defendant
claiming
voluntary
compliance
moots
case
bears
formidable
burden
showing
absolutely
clear
allegedly
wrongful
behavior
reasonably
expected
recur
concentrated
phosphate
export
assn
contrast
lawsuit
brought
force
compliance
plaintiff
burden
establish
standing
demonstrating
unchecked
litigation
defendant
allegedly
wrongful
behavior
likely
occur
continue
threatened
injury
certainly
impending
whitmore
arkansas
citations
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
thus
lyons
already
noted
held
plaintiff
lacked
initial
standing
seek
injunction
enforcement
police
chokehold
policy
credibly
allege
faced
realistic
threat
arising
policy
elsewhere
opinion
however
noted
citywide
moratorium
police
chokeholds
action
surely
diminished
already
slim
likelihood
particular
individual
choked
police
mooted
otherwise
valid
claim
injunctive
relief
moratorium
terms
permanent
plain
lesson
cases
circumstances
prospect
defendant
engage
resume
harmful
conduct
may
speculative
support
standing
speculative
overcome
mootness
furthermore
mootness
simply
standing
set
time
frame
exception
mootness
arises
defendant
allegedly
unlawful
activity
capable
repetition
yet
evading
review
exist
example
mentally
disabled
patient
files
lawsuit
challenging
confinement
segregated
institution
postcomplaint
transfer
program
moot
action
olmstead
slip
despite
fact
lacked
initial
standing
filed
complaint
transfer
standing
admits
similar
exception
plaintiff
lacks
standing
time
action
commences
fact
dispute
capable
repetition
yet
evading
review
entitle
complainant
federal
judicial
forum
see
steel
mootness
exception
disputes
capable
repetition
yet
evading
review
revive
dispute
became
moot
action
quoting
renne
geary
acknowledged
distinction
mootness
standing
recently
steel
argues
injunctive
relief
constitute
remediation
presumption
future
injury
defendant
voluntarily
ceased
illegal
activity
response
litigation
even
occurs
complaint
filed
makes
sword
shield
presumption
government
refers
applied
refute
assertion
mootness
defendant
sued
complaint
alleges
present
threatened
injury
ceases
activity
immense
unacceptable
stretch
call
presumption
service
substitute
allegation
present
threatened
injury
upon
initial
standing
must
based
standing
doctrine
functions
ensure
among
things
scarce
resources
federal
courts
devoted
disputes
parties
concrete
stake
contrast
time
mootness
issue
case
brought
litigated
often
years
abandon
case
advanced
stage
may
prove
wasteful
frugal
argument
sunk
costs
license
courts
retain
jurisdiction
cases
one
parties
plainly
lacks
continuing
interest
parties
settled
plaintiff
pursuing
nonsurviving
claim
died
see
defunis
odegaard
per
curiam
challenge
constitutionality
law
school
admissions
process
mooted
plaintiff
admitted
pursuant
preliminary
injunction
neared
graduation
defendant
law
school
conceded
matter
ordinary
school
policy
plaintiff
allowed
finish
final
term
arizonans
challenge
state
constitutional
amendment
declaring
english
official
language
state
became
moot
plaintiff
state
employee
sought
use
bilingual
skills
left
state
employment
argument
surely
highlights
important
difference
two
doctrines
see
generally
honig
doe
rehnquist
concurring
brief
laidlaw
appears
argue
regardless
effect
laidlaw
compliance
foe
doomed
civil
penalty
claim
mootness
failing
appeal
district
denial
injunctive
relief
brief
respondent
argument
misconceives
statutory
scheme
district
discretion
determine
form
relief
best
suited
particular
case
abate
current
violations
deter
future
ones
federal
judge
sitting
chancellor
mechanically
obligated
grant
injunction
every
violation
law
weinberger
denial
injunctive
relief
necessarily
mean
district
concluded
prospect
future
violations
civil
penalties
deter
indeed
meant
thing
case
district
denied
injunctive
relief
expressly
based
award
civil
penalties
need
deterrence
see
dissent
notes
post
federal
courts
aim
ensure
framing
relief
broader
required
precise
facts
schlesinger
reservists
comm
stop
war
accordance
aim
district
clean
water
act
citizen
suit
properly
may
conclude
injunction
excessively
intrusive
remedy
entail
continuing
superintendence
permit
holder
activities
federal
process
burdensome
permit
holder
alike
see
city
mesquite
although
defendant
voluntary
cessation
challenged
practice
moot
case
uch
abandonment
important
factor
bearing
question
whether
exercise
power
enjoin
defendant
renewing
practice
laidlaw
also
asserts
supplemental
suggestion
mootness
closure
roebuck
facility
took
place
appeals
issued
decision
mooted
case
facility
closure
like
laidlaw
earlier
achievement
substantial
compliance
permit
requirements
might
moot
case
reiterate
one
events
made
absolutely
clear
laidlaw
permit
violations
reasonably
expected
recur
concentrated
phosphate
export
assn
effect
laidlaw
compliance
facility
closure
prospect
future
violations
disputed
factual
matter
foe
points
example
laidlaw
appear
contest
laidlaw
retains
npdes
permit
issues
aired
lower
courts
remain
open
consideration
remand
foe
argues
entitled
attorneys
fees
theory
plaintiff
prevailing
party
purposes
catalyst
triggered
favorable
outcome
decision
review
appeals
noted
circuit
precedent
construed
decision
farrar
hobby
require
rejection
theory
citing
state
bd
ed
en
banc
cf
foreman
dallas
county
stating
dicta
fter
farrar
continuing
validity
catalyst
theory
serious
doubt
farrar
acknowledged
civil
rights
plaintiff
awarded
nominal
damages
may
prevailing
party
case
involved
catalytic
effect
recognizing
issue
presented
decision
farrar
several
courts
appeals
expressly
concluded
farrar
repudiate
catalyst
theory
see
marbley
bane
baumgartner
harrisburg
housing
authority
zinn
shalala
little
rock
school
dist
pulaski
county
special
sch
kilgour
pasadena
beard
teska
morris
west
palm
beach
courts
appeals
likewise
continued
apply
catalyst
theory
notwithstanding
farrar
paris
dept
housing
urban
development
citizens
tax
waste
westerville
city
school
premature
however
us
address
continuing
validity
catalyst
theory
context
case
district
order
separate
one
imposed
civil
penalties
laidlaw
stayed
time
petition
attorneys
fees
time
appeal
expired
either
party
appealed
appeal
resolved
see
describing
order
staying
time
attorneys
fees
petition
opinion
accompanying
order
penalties
district
stated
considered
laidlaw
required
reimburse
plaintiffs
significant
amount
legal
fees
referred
potential
fee
awards
thus
appeals
addressed
availability
counsel
fees
case
order
either
denying
awarding
fees
district
address
first
instance
request
reimbursement
costs
including
fees
reasons
stated
judgment
appeals
fourth
circuit
reversed
case
remanded
proceedings
consistent
opinion
ordered
friends
earth
incorporated
et
al
petitioners
laidlaw
environmental
services
toc
writ
certiorari
appeals
fourth
circuit
january
ustice
tevens
concurring
although
identified
sufficient
reason
rejecting
appeals
mootness
determination
important
also
note
case
moot
even
absolutely
clear
respondent
gone
business
posed
threat
future
permit
violations
district
entered
valid
judgment
requiring
respondent
pay
civil
penalty
conduct
respondent
retroactively
invalidate
judgment
record
voluntary
compliance
justify
decision
injunctive
relief
unnecessary
even
decision
claim
injunctive
relief
moot
warrant
vacation
valid
money
judgment
furthermore
petitioners
claim
civil
penalties
moot
even
absolutely
clear
respondent
violations
reasonably
expected
recur
respondent
achieved
substantial
compliance
permit
requirements
petitioners
filed
complaint
district
entered
judgment
courts
appeals
uniformly
concluded
polluter
voluntary
cessation
alleged
violation
moot
claim
civil
penalties
even
sufficient
moot
related
claim
injunctive
declaratory
relief
conclusion
consistent
structure
clean
water
act
attaches
liability
civil
penalties
time
permit
violation
occurs
person
violates
certain
provisions
act
certain
permit
conditions
limitations
shall
subject
civil
penalty
also
consistent
character
civil
penalties
purposes
mootness
analysis
equated
punitive
damages
rather
injunctive
declaratory
relief
see
tull
one
contends
defendant
conduct
moot
claim
punitive
damages
civil
penalties
treated
way
cases
cited
discussion
mootness
issue
involved
requests
injunctive
declaratory
relief
one
los
angeles
lyons
plaintiff
seek
damages
case
opinion
makes
clear
inability
obtain
injunctive
relief
impact
damages
claim
precedent
either
jurisprudence
aware
provides
support
suggestion
factual
developments
might
moot
claim
injunctive
declaratory
relief
either
moot
claim
monetary
relief
retroactively
invalidate
valid
money
judgment
friends
earth
incorporated
et
al
petitioners
laidlaw
environmental
services
toc
writ
certiorari
appeals
fourth
circuit
january
ustice
ennedy
concurring
difficult
fundamental
questions
raised
ask
whether
exactions
public
fines
private
litigants
delegation
executive
power
might
inferable
authorization
permissible
view
responsibilities
committed
executive
article
ii
constitution
questions
presented
petition
certiorari
identify
issues
particularity
neither
appeals
deciding
case
parties
briefing
devoted
specific
attention
subject
view
matters
best
reserved
later
case
observation
join
opinion
friends
earth
incorporated
et
al
petitioners
laidlaw
environmental
services
toc
writ
certiorari
appeals
fourth
circuit
january
justice
scalia
justice
thomas
joins
dissenting
begins
analysis
finding
injury
fact
basis
vague
affidavits
undermined
district
express
finding
laidlaw
discharges
caused
demonstrable
harm
environment
proceeds
marry
private
wrong
public
remedy
union
violates
traditional
principles
federal
standing
thereby
permitting
law
enforcement
placed
hands
private
individuals
finally
suggests
avoid
mootness
one
needs
even
less
stake
outcome
requirements
initial
standing
dissent
plaintiffs
parties
invoking
federal
jurisdiction
burden
proof
persuasion
existence
standing
lujan
defenders
wildlife
hereinafter
lujan
dallas
plaintiffs
case
fell
far
short
carrying
burden
demonstrating
injury
fact
cites
affiants
testimony
asserting
enjoyment
north
tyger
river
diminished
due
concern
water
polluted
believed
laidlaw
mercury
exceedances
reduced
value
homes
ante
averments
alone
carry
plaintiffs
burden
demonstrating
suffered
concrete
particularized
injury
lujan
general
allegations
injury
may
suffice
pleading
stage
summary
judgment
plaintiffs
must
set
forth
specific
facts
support
claims
id
case
proceeded
judgment
specific
facts
must
supported
adequately
evidence
adduced
trial
ibid
quoting
gladstone
realtors
village
bellwood
case
affidavits
woefully
short
specific
facts
vague
allegations
injury
make
undermined
evidence
adduced
trial
typically
environmental
plaintiff
claiming
injury
due
discharges
violation
clean
water
act
argues
discharges
harm
environment
harm
environment
injures
route
injury
barred
present
case
however
since
district
concluded
considering
evidence
demonstrated
proof
harm
environment
supp
sc
permit
violations
issue
citizen
suit
result
health
risk
environmental
harm
ibid
available
data
fail
show
laidlaw
actual
discharges
resulted
harm
north
tyger
river
id
overall
quality
river
exceeds
levels
necessary
support
recreation
water
id
finds
conclusions
unproblematic
standing
relevant
showing
purposes
article
iii
standing
injury
environment
injury
plaintiff
ante
statement
correct
far
goes
certainly
held
demonstration
harm
environment
enough
satisfy
requirement
unless
plaintiff
demonstrate
personally
harmed
lujan
supra
normal
course
however
lack
demonstrable
harm
environment
translate
plainly
lack
demonstrable
harm
citizen
plaintiffs
perhaps
possible
plaintiff
harmed
even
though
environment
plaintiff
burden
articulating
demonstrating
nature
injury
ongoing
concerns
environment
enough
reality
threat
repeated
injury
relevant
standing
inquiry
plaintiff
subjective
apprehensions
los
angeles
lyons
least
present
case
one
expect
see
evidence
supporting
affidavits
bald
assertions
regarding
decreasing
recreational
usage
declining
home
values
well
evidence
improbable
proposition
laidlaw
violations
even
though
harmless
environment
somehow
responsible
effects
cf
gladstone
supra
noting
standing
established
convincing
evidence
decline
real
estate
values
attributable
defendant
conduct
plaintiffs
made
attempt
showing
rely
entirely
upon
unsupported
unexplained
affidavit
allegations
concern
indeed
every
one
affiants
deposed
laidlaw
cast
doubt
event
inadequate
proposition
subjective
concerns
actually
affected
conduct
linda
moore
example
said
affidavit
use
affected
waterways
recreation
concern
pollution
record
doc
exhs
yet
testified
deposition
river
twice
visited
someone
lived
river
suit
filed
record
doc
moore
deposition
similarly
kenneth
lee
curtis
claimed
injured
deprived
recreational
activity
river
admitted
river
since
kid
curtis
deposition
pt
asked
whether
reason
stopped
visiting
river
pollution
answered
id
curtis
claim
river
looke
smell
ed
polluted
condition
present
surely
caused
laidlaw
discharges
according
district
result
health
risk
environmental
harm
affiants
cited
deposed
affidavits
state
either
use
river
polluted
harmful
subsequently
found
record
doc
exhs
said
river
looks
polluted
also
incompatible
findings
ibid
exh
affiants
established
nothing
subjective
apprehensions
correct
district
explicitly
found
standing
albeit
slimmest
margins
awfully
close
call
app
tr
hearing
june
cautious
finding
however
made
long
conclusion
laidlaw
discharges
harm
environment
previously
recognized
initial
conclusion
plaintiffs
standing
subject
reexamination
particularly
later
evidence
proves
inconsistent
conclusion
gladstone
wyoming
oklahoma
laidlaw
challenged
existence
injury
fact
appeal
fourth
circuit
reach
question
thus
lower
reviewed
issue
light
extensive
studies
led
district
conclude
environment
harmed
laidlaw
discharges
inexplicably
untroubled
proceeds
find
injury
fact
casual
fashion
though
merely
confirming
careful
analysis
made
although
previously
refused
find
standing
based
conclusory
allegations
affidavit
lujan
national
wildlife
federation
content
today
accepting
plaintiffs
vague
contradictory
unsubstantiated
allegations
concern
environment
adequate
prove
injury
fact
accepting
even
face
finding
environment
demonstrably
harmed
makes
requirement
sham
permit
violations
member
plaintiff
environmental
organization
lives
near
offending
plant
difficult
satisfy
today
lenient
standard
ii
treatment
redressability
requirement
unnecessary
resolved
question
correctly
equally
cavalier
discussed
petitioners
allege
ongoing
injury
consisting
diminished
enjoyment
affected
waterways
decreased
property
values
allege
injuries
caused
laidlaw
continuing
permit
violations
remedy
petitioners
seek
neither
recompense
injuries
injunction
future
violations
instead
remedy
statutorily
specified
penalty
past
violations
payable
entirely
treasury
last
term
held
penalties
redress
injury
citizen
plaintiff
suffered
past
violations
steel
citizens
better
environment
nonetheless
finds
redressability
requirement
satisfied
distinguishing
steel
co
ground
case
petitioners
allege
ongoing
violations
payment
penalties
says
remedy
petitioners
injury
deterring
future
violations
laidlaw
ante
holds
penalty
payable
public
remedies
threatened
private
harm
suffices
sustain
private
suit
holding
precedent
jurisprudence
takes
beyond
cases
controversies
article
iii
constitution
entrusted
resolution
even
appropriate
moreover
allow
article
iii
remediation
requirement
satisfied
indirect
private
consequences
public
penalty
consequences
entirely
speculative
present
case
new
standing
law
makes
like
expansions
standing
beyond
traditional
constitutional
limits
grave
implications
democratic
governance
shall
discuss
three
points
turn
linda
richard
plaintiff
mother
illegitimate
child
sought
behalf
child
others
similarly
situated
injunction
discriminatory
application
art
texas
penal
code
although
provision
made
misdemeanor
parent
refuse
support
minor
children
years
age
enforced
married
parents
refusal
plaintiff
contended
deprived
child
equal
protection
law
denying
deterrent
effect
statute
upon
father
failure
fulfill
support
obligation
held
article
iii
standing
direct
relationship
said
alleged
injury
claim
sought
adjudicated
since
prospect
prosecution
least
future
result
payment
support
best
termed
speculative
id
cases
demonstrate
american
jurisprudence
least
private
citizen
lacks
judicially
cognizable
interest
prosecution
nonprosecution
another
id
although
linda
recited
logical
nexus
analysis
flast
cohen
since
fallen
desuetude
clear
standing
denied
unlikelihood
relief
requested
redress
appellant
claimed
injury
duke
power
carolina
environmental
study
group
logical
nexus
nonenforcement
statute
linda
failure
receive
support
payments
prospect
prosecution
result
payment
support
speculative
linda
supra
say
uncertain
whether
relief
prevent
injury
course
precisely
situation
exists
principle
american
jurisprudence
private
citizen
lacks
judicially
cognizable
interest
prosecution
nonprosecution
another
applies
less
prosecution
civil
penalties
payable
state
prosecution
criminal
penalties
owing
state
opinion
reads
though
purpose
effect
redressability
requirement
assure
plaintiff
receive
benefit
relief
orders
federal
tort
plaintiff
fearing
repetition
injury
ask
tort
damages
paid
victims
well
theory
damages
least
deterrent
effect
beneficial
suit
preposterous
remediation
traditional
business
courts
relief
specifically
tailored
plaintiff
injury
sort
relief
incidental
benefit
plaintiff
generalized
grievance
affects
entire
citizenry
satisfy
requirement
even
though
aggrieves
plaintiff
along
everyone
else
see
lujan
also
generalized
remedy
deters
future
unlawful
activity
persons
satisfy
remediation
requirement
even
though
deters
among
things
repetition
particular
unlawful
activity
particular
plaintiffs
thus
relief
prospective
harm
traditionally
afforded
way
injunction
scope
limited
scope
threatened
injury
lewis
casey
lyons
seeking
overturn
tradition
giving
individual
plaintiff
power
invoke
public
remedy
congress
done
precisely
said
convert
undifferentiated
public
interest
individual
right
vindicable
courts
lujan
supra
steel
sort
scattershot
redress
approved
today
makes
nonsense
statement
schlesinger
reservists
comm
stop
war
requirement
injury
fact
insures
framing
relief
broader
required
precise
facts
claim
particularized
future
injury
today
made
vehicle
pursuing
generalized
penalties
past
violations
threshold
showing
injury
fact
become
lever
move
world
discussed
view
plaintiff
desire
benefit
deterrent
effect
public
penalty
past
conduct
never
suffice
establish
case
controversy
sort
known
law
deterrent
effect
speak
speculative
matter
law
even
however
deterrent
effect
present
case
surely
speculative
matter
fact
recognizes
course
satisfy
article
iii
must
likely
opposed
merely
speculative
favorable
decision
redress
plaintiffs
injury
lujan
supra
see
ante
recognizes
deterrent
effects
civil
penalties
meet
standard
though
declines
explore
outer
limits
adequate
deterrence
ante
concludes
however
present
case
civil
penalties
sought
foe
carried
deterrent
effect
satisfied
likely
rather
speculative
standard
ibid
little
opinion
explain
believes
cites
district
conclusion
penalties
imposed
along
anticipated
fee
awards
provided
adequate
deterrence
ante
absolutely
reason
believe
however
meant
deterrence
adequate
prevent
injury
plaintiffs
otherwise
occur
statute
even
mention
deterrence
general
much
less
deterrence
future
harm
particular
plaintiff
one
elements
consider
fixing
amount
penalty
element
come
last
residual
category
matters
justice
may
require
statute
require
consider
seriousness
violation
violations
economic
benefit
resulting
violation
history
violations
efforts
comply
applicable
requirements
economic
impact
penalty
violator
ibid
see
district
meticulously
discussed
subsections
portion
opinion
entitled
civil
penalty
one
specified
factors
subsection
entitled
matters
justice
may
require
discussed
laidlaw
failure
avail
reopener
clause
recent
compliance
history
mercury
limit
mention
whatever
portion
opinion
anywhere
else
degree
deterrence
necessary
prevent
future
harm
particular
plaintiffs
indeed
neither
district
final
opinion
contains
adequate
deterrence
statement
earlier
opinion
dealing
preliminary
question
whether
south
carolina
previous
lawsuit
laidlaw
constituted
diligent
prosecution
bar
citizen
suit
see
displayed
awareness
deterrence
future
injury
plaintiffs
necessary
support
standing
district
earlier
opinion
however
quote
approval
passage
district
case
began
civil
penalties
seek
deter
pollution
discouraging
future
violations
serve
function
amount
civil
penalty
must
high
enough
insure
polluters
simply
absorb
penalty
cost
business
app
quoting
pirg
powell
duffryn
terminals
supp
nj
district
concluded
civil
penalty
section
opinion
statement
aken
together
believes
penalty
potential
fee
awards
laidlaw
direct
indirect
litigation
expenses
provide
adequate
deterrence
circumstances
case
obviously
harking
back
general
statement
statutorily
prescribed
factors
justice
may
require
factors
case
include
particularized
even
generalized
deterrence
designed
achieve
meant
believed
civil
penalty
prescribed
met
statutory
standards
points
previously
said
civil
penalties
deterrent
effect
ante
quoting
hudson
unquestionably
true
general
matter
polluters
class
deterred
violating
discharge
limits
availability
civil
penalties
however
none
cases
cites
focused
deterrent
effect
single
imposition
penalties
particular
lawbreaker
even
less
focus
question
whether
particularized
deterrent
effect
enough
redress
injury
citizen
plaintiff
sense
required
article
iii
involved
penalties
pursued
government
citizens
see
hudson
supra
department
revenue
mont
kurth
ranch
tull
undertaken
necessary
inquiry
whether
significant
deterrence
plaintiffs
feared
injury
likely
reason
something
like
strictly
speaking
polluter
deterred
penalty
past
pollution
deterred
fear
penalty
future
pollution
fear
virtually
nonexistent
prospective
polluter
knows
emissions
violators
given
free
pass
substantial
emissions
program
federal
scheme
regularly
notoriously
enforced
even
higher
prospective
polluter
subject
regularly
enforced
program
object
public
charges
pollution
suit
injunction
surely
near
top
graph
prospective
polluter
already
subjected
state
penalties
past
pollution
deterrence
plaintiffs
must
rely
standing
present
case
marginal
increase
laidlaw
fear
future
penalties
achieved
adding
federal
penalties
laidlaw
past
conduct
say
certain
marginal
increase
zero
say
certain
entirely
speculative
whether
make
difference
plaintiffs
suffering
injury
future
plaintiffs
going
unharmed
fact
assertion
likely
entirely
farfetched
speculativeness
result
much
greater
speculativeness
found
excessive
simon
eastern
ky
welfare
rights
organization
held
denying
tax
status
hospitals
refused
treat
indigents
sufficiently
likely
assure
future
treatment
indigent
plaintiffs
support
standing
much
greater
speculativeness
found
excessive
linda
richard
discussed
supra
said
prospect
prosecution
nonsupport
result
payment
support
best
termed
speculative
sum
case
suggests
within
central
core
deterrence
standing
impossible
imagine
outer
limits
possibly
expressed
reluctance
define
outer
limits
serves
disguise
fact
promulgated
revolutionary
new
doctrine
standing
permit
entire
body
public
civil
penalties
handed
enforcement
private
interests
article
ii
constitution
commits
president
take
care
laws
faithfully
executed
art
ii
provides
specific
methods
persons
exercising
significant
executive
power
appointed
art
ii
justice
kennedy
concurrence
correctly
observes
question
conformity
legislation
article
ii
argued
like
address
article
iii
less
article
ii
consequences
structure
government
see
schlesinger
worth
noting
changes
structure
today
decision
allows
permitting
citizens
pursue
civil
penalties
payable
federal
treasury
act
provide
mechanism
individual
relief
traditional
sense
turns
private
citizens
function
enforcing
law
clean
water
act
plaintiff
pursuing
civil
penalties
acts
often
case
plaintiff
national
association
significant
discretion
choosing
enforcement
targets
association
aware
reported
violation
need
look
long
injured
member
least
theory
injury
applies
today
see
supra
target
chosen
suit
goes
forward
without
meaningful
public
control
availability
civil
penalties
vastly
disproportionate
individual
injury
gives
citizen
plaintiffs
massive
bargaining
power
often
used
achieve
settlements
requiring
defendant
support
environmental
projects
plaintiffs
choosing
see
greve
private
enforcement
environmental
law
tulane
rev
thus
public
fine
diverted
private
interest
sure
epa
may
foreclose
citizen
suit
bringing
suit
allows
public
authorities
avoid
private
enforcement
accepting
private
direction
enforcement
undertaken
less
constitutionally
bizarre
elected
officials
entirely
deprived
discretion
decide
given
violation
object
suit
enforcement
decision
postponed
see
providing
citizen
plaintiff
need
wait
days
giving
notice
violation
government
proceeding
action
predictable
inevitable
consequence
allowing
use
public
remedies
private
wrongs
iii
finally
offer
comments
regarding
discussion
whether
foe
claims
became
moot
reason
laidlaw
substantial
compliance
permit
limits
disagree
conclusion
reaches
assuming
plaintiffs
standing
pursue
civil
penalties
first
instance
claim
might
well
mooted
laidlaw
voluntary
compliance
permit
leaving
question
open
consideration
remand
ante
seems
sensible
reaching
disposition
however
engages
troubling
discussion
purported
distinctions
doctrines
standing
mootness
frankly
puzzled
discussion
appears
laidlaw
claimed
compliance
squarely
within
bounds
voluntary
cessation
doctrine
basis
remand
ante
reason
engage
interesting
academic
excursus
upon
differences
mootness
standing
order
invoke
obviously
applicable
rule
discussion
essential
indeed
even
relevant
decision
limited
significance
nonetheless
troubled
retreat
characterization
mootness
doctrine
standing
set
time
frame
arizonans
official
english
arizona
repeatedly
recognized
required
litigation
continue
essentially
identical
required
litigation
begin
must
justiciable
case
controversy
required
article
iii
simply
stated
case
moot
issues
presented
longer
live
parties
lack
legally
cognizable
interest
outcome
powell
mccormack
may
proceed
hear
action
subsequent
initiation
dispute
loses
character
present
live
controversy
kind
must
exist
avoid
advisory
opinions
abstract
propositions
law
hall
beals
per
curiam
see
also
preiser
newkirk
steffel
thompson
requirement
continuing
case
controversy
derives
constitution
liner
jafco
may
ignored
inconvenient
alaska
moot
question
decided
owever
convenient
might
suggests
save
sunk
costs
compare
ante
lewis
continental
bank
easonable
caution
needed
sure
mooted
litigation
pressed
forward
solely
order
obtain
reimbursement
sunk
costs
true
mootness
added
wrinkles
standing
lacks
one
voluntary
cessation
doctrine
refers
inaccurate
regard
reduction
basic
requirement
standing
obtained
beginning
suit
genuine
controversy
must
exist
stages
initial
suit
brought
way
suit
declaratory
judgment
defendant
actually
violated
plaintiff
alleged
rights
also
initial
suit
continued
even
though
defendant
stopped
violating
plaintiff
alleged
rights
voluntary
cessation
doctrine
nothing
evidentiary
presumption
controversy
reflected
violation
alleged
rights
continues
exist
steel
similarly
fact
find
cases
moot
challenged
conduct
capable
repetition
yet
evading
review
demonstrate
requirements
mootness
standing
differ
conduct
ceased
time
demonstrated
probability
recur
controversy
parties
personal
stake
outcome
continues
exist
honig
doe
scalia
dissenting
emphasis
omitted
part
confusion
discussion
engendered
fact
compares
standing
one
hand
mootness
based
voluntary
cessation
hand
ante
required
showing
absolutely
clear
conduct
reasonably
expected
recur
threshold
showing
required
mootness
heightened
showing
required
particular
category
cases
sensibly
concluded
reason
skeptical
cessation
violation
means
cessation
live
controversy
claims
mootness
based
changes
circumstances
voluntary
cessation
showing
required
less
taxing
inquiry
indeed
properly
characterized
one
standing
set
time
frame
see
arizonans
supra
case
mooted
plaintiff
change
jobs
deprived
case
still
vital
claim
prospective
relief
spencer
kemna
case
mooted
petitioner
completion
sentence
since
throughout
litigation
plaintiff
must
suffered
threatened
actual
injury
traceable
defendant
likely
redressed
favorable
judicial
decision
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
lewis
supra
case
state
mooted
change
federal
law
eliminated
parties
personal
stake
outcome
sum
may
correct
parallel
standing
mootness
imperfect
due
realistic
evidentiary
presumptions
nature
applicable
mootness
context
change
underlying
principle
requisite
personal
interest
must
exist
commencement
litigation
must
continue
throughout
existence
arizonans
supra
quoting
parole
geraghty
uncritically
accepting
vague
claims
injury
turned
article
iii
requirement
injury
fact
mere
pleading
requirement
lujan
approving
novel
theory
public
penalties
redress
anticipated
private
wrongs
come
close
mak
ing
redressability
requirement
vanish
steel
supra
undesirable
unconstitutional
consequence
today
decision
place
immense
power
suing
enforce
public
laws
private
hands
respectfully
dissent
footnotes
district
noted
laidlaw
drafted
complaint
settlement
agreement
filed
lawsuit
paid
filing
fee
settlement
agreement
dhec
laidlaw
entered
unusual
haste
without
giving
plaintiffs
opportunity
intervene
ibid
found
persuasive
fact
imposing
civil
penalty
laidlaw
dhec
failed
recover
even
calculate
economic
benefit
laidlaw
received
complying
permit
dissent
suggests
little
deterrent
work
civil
penalties
case
lawsuit
brought
laidlaw
dhec
already
pushed
level
deterrence
near
top
graph
post
suggestion
ignores
district
specific
finding
penalty
agreed
laidlaw
dhec
far
low
remove
laidlaw
economic
benefit
noncompliance
thus
inadequate
deter
future
violations
supp
sc
begins
look
especially
farfetched
one
recalls
laidlaw
prompted
dhec
lawsuit
paid
filing
fee
drafted
complaint
see
supra
tigner
rejected
equal
protection
challenge
statutory
provision
exempting
agricultural
producers
reach
texas
antitrust
laws
insisting
redressability
requirement
met
dissent
relies
heavily
linda
richard
reliance
sorely
misplaced
linda
mother
child
filed
suit
force
district
attorney
bring
criminal
prosecution
absentee
father
failure
pay
child
support
finding
mother
lacked
standing
seek
extraordinary
remedy
drew
attention
special
status
criminal
prosecutions
system
carefully
limited
holding
unique
context
challenge
criminal
statute
furthermore
redressability
relief
sought
linda
prosecution
successful
automatically
land
delinquent
father
jail
fixed
term
predictably
negative
effects
earning
power
scarcely
remedy
plaintiff
lack
child
support
payments
regard
contrasted
civil
contempt
model
whereby
defendant
keeps
keys
jail
pocket
may
released
whenever
complies
legal
obligations
ibid
dissent
contention
post
precisely
situation
exists
linda
say
least
extravagant
putting
aside
mistaken
reliance
linda
dissent
broader
charge
citizen
suits
civil
penalties
act
carry
grave
implications
democratic
governance
post
seems
us
overdrawn
certainly
federal
executive
branch
share
dissent
view
suits
dissipate
authority
enforce
law
fact
department
justice
endorsed
citizen
suit
outset
submitting
amicus
briefs
support
foe
district
appeals
see
supra
already
noted
supra
federal
government
retains
power
foreclose
citizen
suit
undertaking
action
executive
branch
opposes
particular
citizen
suit
statute
allows
administrator
epa
intervene
matter
right
bring
government
views
attention
course
mean
sunk
costs
judicial
system
litigants
lewis
continental
bank
cited
dissent
post
dealt
latter
noting
courts
use
caution
avoid
carrying
forward
moot
case
solely
vindicate
plaintiff
interest
recovering
attorneys
fees
note
far
clear
vacatur
district
judgment
appropriate
response
finding
mootness
appeal
brought
voluntary
conduct
party
lost
district
see
bancorp
mortgage
bonner
mall
partnership
mootness
attributable
voluntary
act
nonprevailing
party
ordinarily
justify
vacatur
judgment
review
see
also
walling
james
reuter
footnotes
comfort
lake
assn
dresel
contracting
atlantic
legal
foundation
stroh
die
casting
cert
denied
natural
resources
defense
council
texaco
refining
atlantic
legal
foundation
pan
tanning
atlantic
legal
foundation
tyson
foods
chesapeake
bay
foundation
gwaltney
smithfield
cf
powell
mccormack
several
forms
relief
requested
one
requests
subsequently
becomes
moot
still
considered
remaining
requests
footnotes
decision
linda
turn
today
opinion
imaginatively
suggests
father
inability
pay
support
imprisoned
ante
comment
upon
imprisonment
unlike
imprisonment
civil
contempt
condition
father
release
upon
payment
continued
prospect
prosecution
least
future
upon
completion
imprisonment
result
payment
support
best
termed
speculative
linda
points
government
allowed
intervene
citizen
suit
see
ante
power
bring
government
views
attention
ante
meager
substitute
power
decide
whether
prosecution
occur
indeed
according
chief
executive
ability
intervene
place
par
john
public
intervene
whether
government
likes
files
suit
observes
federal
executive
branch
share
dissent
view
suits
dissipate
authority
enforce
law
since
endorsed
citizen
suit
outset
ante
course
doubtful
cases
long
uninterrupted
history
presidential
acquiescence
approval
shed
light
upon
constitutional
understanding
acquiescence
approval
single
administration
deserve
passing
mention
addition
compliance
issues
also
remains
open
remand
question
whether
current
suit
foreclosed
earlier
suit
state
diligently
prosecuted
see
nothing
opinion
disposes
issue
opinion
notes
district
finding
laidlaw
played
significant
role
facilitating
state
action
ante
incompatibility
whatever
defendant
facilitation
suit
state
diligent
prosecution
prosecutions
felons
confess
crimes
turn
regularly
demonstrate
laidlaw
entirely
within
rights
prefer
state
suit
private
enforcement
action
preference
prudent
given
state
must
act
within
days
receiving
notice
citizen
suit
see
given
number
cases
state
agencies
handle
laidlaw
make
sure
case
fall
cracks
south
carolina
interest
action
feigned
last
minute
contrivance
worked
laidlaw
resolving
problem
many
years
previously
undertaken
administrative
enforcement
action
resulting
consent
order
supp
sc
south
carolina
filed
amicus
brief
arguing
allowing
citizen
suits
proceed
despite
ongoing
state
enforcement
efforts
provide
citizens
federal
judges
opportunity
relitigate
enforcement
permitting
actions
south
carolina
brief
south
carolina
amicus
curiae
unlike
justice
stevens
concurrence
opinion
appears
recognize
claim
civil
penalties
moot
clear
future
injury
plaintiff
hands
defendant
occur
concurrence
suggests
civil
penalties
like
traditional
damages
remedies
mooted
absence
threatened
injury
analogy
inapt
traditional
money
damages
payable
compensate
harm
past
conduct
subsists
whether
future
harm
threatened
civil
penalties
privately
assessable
according
deter
threatened
future
harm
plaintiff
threat
plaintiff
claim
deterrence
proposition
impossibility
future
violation
moot
case
holds
true
course
suits
government
rest
upon
theory
particular
future
harm
prevented
attempts
frame
exposition
corrective
fourth
circuit
claims
confused
mootness
standing
ante
fourth
circuit
conclusion
nonjusticiability
rested
upon
belief
entirely
correct
view
remedy
pursued
appeal
civil
penalties
redress
foe
claimed
injury
might
characterized
conclusion
foe
standing
pursue
civil
penalties
outset
also
characterized
fourth
circuit
conclusion
foe
declined
appeal
denial
declaratory
judgment
injunction
appealed
inadequacy
civil
penalties
standing
pursue
case
whole
became
moot
given
erroneous
conclusion
civil
penalties
redress
private
injury
course
rejects
formulations
neither
necessitates
academic
discourse
comparing
mootness
standing
doctrines