burks
argued
november
decided
june
petitioner
support
insanity
defense
bank
robbery
charge
offered
expert
testimony
government
offered
expert
lay
testimony
rebuttal
case
submitted
jury
district
denied
motion
acquittal
jury
found
petitioner
guilty
charged
thereafter
motion
new
trial
ground
evidence
insufficient
support
verdict
denied
appeals
holding
government
failed
rebut
petitioner
proof
insanity
reversed
remanded
district
determine
whether
directed
verdict
acquittal
entered
new
trial
ordered
citing
inter
alia
authority
remand
authorizes
federal
appellate
courts
remand
cause
direct
entry
appropriate
judgment
decree
order
require
proceedings
may
circumstances
held
double
jeopardy
clause
fifth
amendment
precludes
second
trial
reviewing
found
evidence
insufficient
sustain
jury
verdict
guilty
remedy
available
entry
judgment
acquittal
pp
purposes
determining
whether
double
jeopardy
clause
precludes
second
trial
reversal
conviction
reversal
based
insufficiency
evidence
distinguished
reversal
trial
error
holding
evidence
insufficient
sustain
guilt
appellate
determines
prosecution
failed
prove
guilt
beyond
reasonable
doubt
given
requirements
entry
judgment
acquittal
permit
second
trial
negate
purpose
double
jeopardy
clause
forbid
second
trial
prosecution
afforded
another
opportunity
supply
evidence
failed
muster
first
trial
pp
makes
difference
defendant
sought
new
trial
one
remedies
even
sole
remedy
waive
right
judgment
acquittal
moving
new
trial
bryan
sapir
yates
forman
overruled
extent
suggest
waiver
pp
burger
delivered
opinion
members
joined
except
blackmun
took
part
consideration
decision
case
bart
durham
iii
argued
cause
filed
briefs
petitioner
frank
easterbrook
argued
cause
pro
hac
vice
brief
acting
solicitor
general
friedman
assistant
attorney
general
civiletti
michael
farrell
chief
justice
burger
delivered
opinion
granted
certiorari
resolve
question
whether
accused
may
subjected
second
trial
conviction
prior
trial
reversed
appellate
solely
lack
sufficient
evidence
sustain
jury
verdict
petitioner
burks
tried
district
crime
robbing
federally
insured
bank
use
dangerous
weapon
violation
burks
principal
defense
insanity
prove
claim
petitioner
produced
three
expert
witnesses
testified
albeit
differing
diagnoses
mental
condition
suffered
mental
illness
time
robbery
rendered
substantially
incapable
conforming
conduct
requirements
law
rebuttal
government
offered
testimony
two
experts
one
testified
although
petitioner
possessed
character
disorder
mentally
ill
prosecution
witness
acknowledged
character
disorder
petitioner
gave
rather
ambiguous
answer
question
whether
burks
capable
conforming
conduct
law
lay
witnesses
also
testified
government
expressing
opinion
petitioner
appeared
capable
normal
functioning
sane
time
alleged
offense
case
submitted
jury
denied
motion
judgment
acquittal
jury
found
burks
guilty
charged
thereafter
filed
timely
motion
new
trial
maintaining
among
things
evidence
insufficient
support
verdict
motion
denied
district
concluded
petitioner
challenge
sufficiency
evidence
utterly
without
merit
appeal
petitioner
narrowed
issues
admitting
affirmative
factual
elements
charge
leaving
claim
concerning
criminal
responsibility
resolved
respect
point
appeals
agreed
petitioner
claim
evidence
insufficient
support
verdict
reversed
conviction
began
noting
government
burden
proving
sanity
beyond
reasonable
doubt
prima
facie
defense
insanity
raised
petitioner
met
obligation
indicated
presenting
specific
testimony
three
experts
unchallenged
credentials
reviewing
went
hold
fulfilled
burden
since
prosecution
evidence
respect
burks
mental
condition
even
viewed
light
favorable
government
effectively
rebu
petitioner
proof
respect
insanity
criminal
responsibility
ibid
particular
witnesses
presented
prosecution
failed
express
definite
opinions
precise
questions
identified
critical
cases
involving
issue
sanity
ibid
point
appeals
rather
terminating
case
petitioner
remanded
district
determination
whether
directed
verdict
acquittal
entered
new
trial
ordered
ibid
indicating
district
choose
appropriate
course
balancing
equities
explicitly
adopted
procedures
utilized
fifth
circuit
bass
guide
used
remand
reverse
remand
case
district
defendant
entitled
directed
verdict
acquittal
unless
government
presents
sufficient
additional
evidence
carry
burden
issue
defendant
sanity
noted
earlier
question
sufficiency
evidence
make
issue
jury
defense
insanity
question
law
decided
trial
judge
district
sitting
without
presence
jury
satisfied
government
presentation
may
order
new
trial
even
government
presents
additional
evidence
district
judge
may
refuse
order
new
trial
finds
record
prosecution
opportunity
fully
develop
case
fact
first
trial
ii
certiorari
question
whether
appeals
correct
holding
government
failed
meet
burden
proof
respect
claim
insanity
accordingly
issue
open
review
given
posture
squarely
presented
question
whether
defendant
may
tried
second
time
reviewing
determined
prior
trial
evidence
insufficient
sustain
verdict
jury
petitioner
argument
straightforward
contends
appeals
holding
nothing
less
decision
district
erred
granting
motion
judgment
acquittal
implication
argues
appellate
reversal
operative
equivalent
district
judgment
acquittal
entered
either
verdict
petitioner
points
however
district
found
evidence
first
trial
inadequate
appeals
said
done
second
trial
violate
double
jeopardy
clause
fifth
amendment
therefore
maintains
makes
difference
determination
evidentiary
insufficiency
made
reviewing
since
double
jeopardy
considerations
regardless
decides
judgment
acquittal
order
position
advanced
petitioner
embraced
prior
holdings
indeed
appeals
recognized
bryan
supra
appear
contrary
bryan
defendant
convicted
district
evasion
federal
income
tax
laws
bryan
moved
judgment
acquittal
close
government
case
evidence
presented
verdict
returned
renewed
motions
asked
alternative
new
trial
motions
denied
appeals
reversed
conviction
specific
ground
evidence
insufficient
sustain
verdict
remanded
case
new
trial
certiorari
granted
determine
whether
appeals
properly
ordered
new
trial
whether
entered
judgment
acquittal
affirming
appeals
decided
first
appeals
statutory
authority
direct
new
trial
bryan
also
maintained
notwithstanding
retrial
prohibited
double
jeopardy
clause
contention
dismissed
one
paragraph
petitioner
contention
require
stand
trial
place
twice
jeopardy
persuasive
sought
obtained
reversal
conviction
assigning
number
alleged
errors
appeal
including
denial
motion
judgment
acquittal
accused
successfully
seeks
review
conviction
double
jeopardy
upon
new
trial
francis
resweber
see
trono
concurring
sapir
judgment
directed
dismissal
indictment
justice
douglas
indicated
basis
reversal
correct
rule
stated
kepner
settled
law
former
jeopardy
includes
one
acquitted
verdict
duly
rendered
jury
acquitted
plainly
double
jeopardy
give
government
another
go
citizen
kepner
case
trial
judge
rendered
verdict
acquittal
guarantee
double
jeopardy
prevent
new
trial
old
offense
see
difference
appellate
orders
judgment
acquittal
lack
evidence
petitioner
sapir
asked
new
trial
different
considerations
come
play
defendant
opens
whole
record
disposition
might
see
bryan
emphasis
added
think
may
drawing
power
statute
doubt
justified
refusing
order
acquittal
even
evidence
might
deemed
palpably
insufficient
particularly
since
petitioners
asked
alternative
new
trial
well
acquittal
see
bryan
three
years
later
forman
treated
questions
conviction
reversed
appeals
due
improper
instruction
jury
trial
error
opposed
evidentiary
insufficiency
although
petitioner
forman
moved
new
trial
judgment
acquittal
argued
new
trial
appropriate
relief
since
requested
judgment
acquittal
respect
specific
trial
error
agreed
appeals
without
distinguishing
reversal
due
trial
error
reversal
resulting
solely
evidentiary
insufficiency
held
new
trial
involve
double
jeopardy
elementary
law
person
tried
second
time
offense
prior
conviction
offense
set
aside
appeal
ball
even
though
petitioner
right
claim
request
new
trial
respect
portion
charge
dealing
statute
limitations
still
plea
double
jeopardy
must
fail
appeals
full
power
go
beyond
particular
relief
sought
see
ball
cases
supra
holdings
area
beginning
bryan
hardly
characterized
models
consistency
clarity
bryan
seemingly
stood
proposition
appellate
order
whatever
relief
appropriate
equitable
regardless
considerations
prompted
reversal
somewhat
different
course
taken
concurrence
sapir
suggested
reversal
evidentiary
insufficiency
require
judgment
acquittal
unless
defendant
requested
new
trial
yates
contrary
implied
new
trials
ordered
cure
prior
inadequacies
proof
even
defendant
moved
completely
resolving
ambiguities
forman
suggested
reviewing
go
beyond
relief
requested
defendant
order
new
trial
circumstances
discussing
sapir
however
forman
intimated
different
result
might
follow
conviction
reversed
evidentiary
insufficiency
defendant
requested
new
trial
line
decisions
least
one
proposition
emerged
defendant
requests
new
trial
one
avenue
relief
may
required
stand
trial
even
conviction
reversed
due
failure
proof
first
trial
given
petitioner
appealed
denial
motion
new
trial
although
moved
acquittal
trial
prior
cases
seem
indicate
appeals
power
remand
terms
ordered
reach
different
result
require
departure
holdings
iii
unquestionably
true
appeals
decision
represente
resolution
correct
factual
elements
offense
charged
martin
linen
supply
deciding
government
failed
come
forward
sufficient
proof
petitioner
capacity
responsible
criminal
acts
clearly
saying
burks
criminal
culpability
established
district
held
first
instance
reviewing
said
done
judgment
acquittal
entered
course
petitioner
retried
offense
see
fong
foo
kepner
consequently
justice
douglas
correctly
perceived
sapir
make
difference
reviewing
rather
trial
determined
evidence
insufficient
see
appellate
decision
unmistakably
meant
district
erred
failing
grant
judgment
acquittal
hold
otherwise
create
purely
arbitrary
distinction
petitioner
position
others
enjoy
benefit
correct
decision
district
see
sumpter
degroote
double
jeopardy
clause
forbids
second
trial
purpose
affording
prosecution
another
opportunity
supply
evidence
failed
muster
first
proceeding
central
objective
prohibition
successive
trials
clause
allow
state
make
repeated
attempts
convict
individual
alleged
offense
since
constitutional
prohibition
double
jeopardy
designed
protect
individual
subjected
hazards
trial
possible
conviction
alleged
offense
green
see
serfass
jorn
nonetheless
discussion
part
ii
supra
indicates
past
holdings
appear
consistent
believe
double
jeopardy
clause
commands
close
reexamination
precedents
however
persuades
us
properly
construed
clause
accordingly
longer
followed
reconsideration
must
begin
bryan
brief
somewhat
cursory
examination
double
jeopardy
issue
limited
stating
accused
successfully
seeks
review
conviction
double
jeopardy
upon
new
trial
citing
louisiana
ex
rel
francis
resweber
trono
two
cited
authorities
represent
totality
analysis
add
little
anything
toward
resolving
double
jeopardy
problem
presented
bryan
resweber
involved
facts
completely
unrelated
evidentiary
insufficiency
admittedly
unusual
circumstances
decided
state
allowed
another
chance
carry
execution
one
properly
convicted
sentence
death
initial
attempted
electrocution
failed
due
mechanical
difficulty
passing
opinion
stated
accused
successfully
seeks
review
conviction
double
jeopardy
upon
new
trial
ball
trono
made
similar
comment
citing
ball
proposition
judgment
conviction
reversed
defendant
appeal
avail
provision
bar
new
trial
offense
convicted
common
ancestor
statements
resweber
trono
ball
provides
logical
starting
point
unraveling
conceptual
confusion
arising
bryan
cases
followed
wake
especially
true
since
ball
appears
represent
first
instance
considered
detail
double
jeopardy
implications
appellate
reversal
north
carolina
pearce
ball
came
twice
first
occasion
writ
error
federal
convictions
murder
initial
review
defendants
found
guilty
obtained
reversal
convictions
due
fatally
defective
indictment
remand
appeal
trial
dismissed
flawed
indictment
proceeded
retry
defendants
new
indictment
convicted
defendants
came
arguing
second
trial
barred
former
jeopardy
rejected
plea
brief
statement
defendant
procures
judgment
upon
indictment
set
aside
may
tried
anew
upon
indictment
upon
another
indictment
offense
convicted
hopt
utah
regina
drury
cox
crim
cas
car
kirw
commonwealth
gould
gray
doubt
ball
correct
allowing
new
trial
rectify
trial
error
principle
double
jeopardy
clause
preclude
government
retrying
defendant
whose
conviction
set
aside
error
proceedings
leading
conviction
part
constitutional
jurisprudence
tateo
emphasis
supplied
various
rationales
advanced
support
policy
allowing
retrial
correct
trial
error
view
reasonable
justification
advanced
tateo
supra
high
price
indeed
society
pay
every
accused
granted
immunity
punishment
defect
sufficient
constitute
reversible
error
proceedings
leading
conviction
said
defendant
conviction
overturned
due
failure
proof
trial
case
prosecution
complain
prejudice
given
one
fair
opportunity
offer
whatever
proof
assemble
moreover
appellate
reversal
means
government
case
lacking
even
submitted
jury
since
necessarily
afford
absolute
finality
jury
verdict
acquittal
matter
erroneous
decision
difficult
conceive
society
greater
interest
retrying
defendant
review
decided
matter
law
jury
properly
returned
verdict
guilty
importance
reversal
grounds
evidentiary
insufficiency
purposes
inquiry
double
jeopardy
clause
underscored
fact
federal
role
deciding
whether
case
considered
jury
quite
limited
even
trial
heard
testimony
witnesses
firsthand
weigh
evidence
assess
credibility
witnesses
judges
merits
motion
acquittal
see
wolfenbarger
nelson
mcclard
curley
app
cert
denied
prevailing
rule
long
district
judge
submit
case
jury
evidence
inferences
therefrom
favorable
prosecution
warrant
jury
finding
defendant
guilty
beyond
reasonable
doubt
see
wright
federal
practice
procedure
pp
powell
app
crawford
app
obviously
federal
appellate
applies
higher
standard
rather
must
sustain
verdict
substantial
evidence
viewed
light
favorable
government
uphold
jury
decision
see
glasser
appropriate
occasion
detail
standards
appellate
reversal
grounds
insufficient
evidence
apparent
decision
confined
cases
prosecution
failure
clear
given
requirements
entry
judgment
acquittal
purposes
clause
negated
afford
government
opportunity
proverbial
second
bite
apple
view
makes
difference
defendant
sought
new
trial
one
remedies
even
sole
remedy
meaningfully
said
person
waives
right
judgment
acquittal
moving
new
trial
see
green
moreover
forman
indicated
appellate
authorized
go
beyond
particular
relief
sought
order
provide
relief
circumstances
since
hold
today
double
jeopardy
clause
precludes
second
trial
reviewing
found
evidence
legally
insufficient
remedy
available
direction
judgment
acquittal
extent
prior
decisions
suggest
moving
new
trial
defendant
waives
right
judgment
acquittal
basis
evidentiary
insufficiency
cases
overruled
accordingly
judgment
appeals
reversed
case
remanded
proceedings
consistent
opinion
reversed
remanded
footnotes
although
appeals
cite
davis
decision
require
allocation
burdens
title
provides
appellate
jurisdiction
may
affirm
modify
vacate
set
aside
reverse
judgment
decree
order
lawfully
brought
review
may
remand
cause
direct
entry
appropriate
judgment
decree
order
require
proceedings
may
circumstances
claim
case
trial
committed
error
excluding
prosecution
evidence
received
rebutted
claim
evidentiary
insufficiency
district
determines
close
either
side
case
evidence
insufficient
shall
order
entry
judgment
acquittal
fed
rule
crim
proc
see
wright
federal
practice
procedure
recognize
terms
remand
case
district
might
well
conclude
balancing
equities
second
trial
held
nonetheless
double
jeopardy
clause
applicable
sweep
absolute
equities
balanced
clause
declared
constitutional
policy
based
grounds
open
judicial
examination
trono
arose
murder
prosecution
philippines
nonjury
trial
defendants
acquitted
crime
murder
convicted
lesser
included
offense
assault
appealed
philippine
islands
reversed
judgment
entered
convictions
murder
increasing
sentences
well
affirmed
although
seems
apparent
majority
unable
agree
common
ground
conclusion
appeal
lesser
offense
destroyed
defense
former
jeopardy
greater
offense
defendant
already
acquitted
green
green
expressly
confined
trono
decision
peculiar
factual
setting
namely
interpretation
statutory
provision
double
jeopardy
pertaining
philippine
islands
see
price
georgia
hopt
utah
last
four
appeals
defendant
murder
conviction
territory
utah
first
three
appeals
convictions
reversed
new
trials
ordered
trial
errors
improper
instruction
absence
accused
portion
trial
improper
hearsay
testimony
received
prejudicial
instruction
inadequate
record
due
failure
record
jury
instructions
claim
evidentiary
insufficiency
sustained
indeed
discussion
double
jeopardy
appears
commonwealth
gould
mass
state
case
defendant
ordered
tried
superseding
indictment
original
indictment
challenged
finally
english
case
queen
drury
cox
crim
cas
eng
defendants
given
improper
sentence
found
guilty
trial
error
assigned
allowed
retrial
saying
man
tried
convicted
attainted
insufficient
indictment
record
erroneous
part
much
jeopardy
literally
punishment
may
lawfully
inflicted
unless
attainder
reversed
error
yet
done
may
certainly
indicted
offense
rule
held
apply
never
jeopardy
former
indictment
eng
suggested
example
appeal
conviction
amounts
waiver
double
jeopardy
protections
see
trono
see
green
supra
appeal
somehow
continues
jeopardy
attached
first
trial
see
price
georgia
supra
see
breed
jones
holding
evidence
insufficient
sustain
guilt
appellate
determines
prosecution
failed
prove
guilt
beyond
reasonable
doubt
see
american
tobacco
basic
issue
appellate
concerns
sufficiency
government
proof
defendant
sanity
reviewing
wary
disturbing
jury
verdict
may
cases
facts
adduced
existence
impact
accused
mental
condition
may
overwhelming
require
judge
conclude
reasonable
juror
entertain
reasonable
doubt
view
complicated
nature
decision
made
intertwining
moral
legal
medical
judgments
require
unusually
strong
showing
induce
us
reverse
conviction
judge
left
critical
issue
criminal
responsibility
jury
king
app
omitted