marion
argued
november
decided
december
appellees
claiming
government
known
crimes
charged
circumstances
crimes
appellees
identities
three
years
indicted
moved
dismiss
ground
indictment
returned
unreasonably
oppressive
unjustifiable
time
alleged
offenses
delay
deprived
rights
due
process
law
speedy
trial
secured
fifth
sixth
amendments
asserting
specific
prejudice
appellees
contended
indictment
required
memory
many
specific
acts
conversations
occurring
several
years
delay
due
prosecutor
negligence
indifference
investigating
case
presenting
grand
jury
district
hearing
granted
appellees
motion
dismissed
indictment
lack
speedy
prosecution
found
defense
bound
seriously
prejudiced
delay
government
took
direct
appeal
postponed
consideration
question
jurisdiction
hearing
merits
held
motion
dismiss
indictment
lack
speedy
trial
nature
confession
avoidance
constituted
motion
bar
appellees
placed
jeopardy
district
entered
order
dismissal
order
therefore
directly
appealable
former
pp
sixth
amendment
guarantee
speedy
trial
applicable
person
accused
crime
case
occur
appellees
previously
arrested
otherwise
charged
indicted
pp
relevant
statute
limitations
provides
safeguard
possible
prejudice
resulting
delay
appellees
indicted
within
applicable
limitations
period
pp
though
due
process
clause
may
provide
basis
dismissing
indictment
defense
show
trial
prosecutorial
delay
prejudiced
right
fair
trial
appellees
claimed
proved
actual
prejudice
resulting
delay
due
process
claims
therefore
speculative
premature
pp
white
delivered
opinion
burger
stewart
blackmun
joined
douglas
filed
opinion
concurring
result
brennan
marshall
joined
post
deputy
solicitor
general
greenawalt
argued
cause
briefs
solicitor
general
griswold
assistant
attorney
general
wilson
acting
assistant
attorney
general
petersen
beatrice
rosenberg
mervyn
hamburg
thomas
penfield
jackson
argued
cause
appellees
filed
brief
appellee
marion
benjamin
wright
cotten
filed
brief
appellee
cratch
alan
cole
isaac
groner
filed
brief
national
association
criminal
defense
lawyers
amicus
curiae
urging
affirmance
justice
white
delivered
opinion
appeal
requires
us
decide
whether
dismissal
federal
indictment
constitutionally
required
reason
period
three
years
occurrence
alleged
criminal
acts
filing
indictment
april
two
appellees
indicted
charged
counts
operating
business
known
allied
enterprises
engaged
business
selling
installing
home
improvements
intercom
sets
fire
control
devices
burglary
detection
systems
allegedly
business
fraudulently
conducted
involved
misrepresentations
alterations
documents
deliberate
nonperformance
contracts
period
covered
indictment
march
february
earliest
specific
act
alleged
occurred
september
latest
january
may
appellees
filed
motion
dismiss
indictment
failure
commence
prosecution
alleged
offenses
charged
therein
within
time
afford
rights
due
process
law
speedy
trial
fifth
sixth
amendments
constitution
evidence
submitted
motion
arguments
counsel
hearing
motion
appears
allied
enterprises
subject
federal
trade
commission
order
february
series
articles
appeared
washington
post
october
reporting
results
newspaper
investigation
practices
employed
home
improvement
firms
allied
articles
also
contained
purported
statements
attorney
district
columbia
describing
office
investigation
firms
predicting
indictments
soon
forthcoming
although
statements
attributed
attorney
mention
allied
specifically
company
mentioned
course
newspaper
stories
summer
request
attorney
office
allied
delivered
certain
records
office
interview
appellee
marion
discussed
conduct
officer
allied
enterprises
grand
jury
indicted
appellees
impaneled
september
appellees
informed
grand
jury
concern
march
indictment
finally
handed
april
appellees
moved
dismiss
indictment
returned
unreasonably
oppressive
unjustifiable
time
alleged
offenses
argued
indictment
required
memory
many
specific
acts
conversations
occurring
several
years
contended
delay
due
negligence
indifference
attorney
investigating
case
presenting
grand
jury
specific
prejudice
claimed
demonstrated
district
judge
dismissed
indictment
lack
speedy
prosecution
conclusion
hearing
remarked
since
government
must
become
aware
relevant
facts
defense
case
bound
seriously
prejudiced
delay
least
three
years
bringing
prosecution
brought
latest
early
appealed
directly
pursuant
supp
postponed
consideration
question
jurisdiction
hearing
merits
case
hold
jurisdiction
merits
reverse
judgment
district
prior
recent
amendment
supp
authorized
appeal
criminal
case
district
sustained
motion
bar
defendant
put
jeopardy
plain
us
appeal
within
purview
section
appellees
placed
jeopardy
district
rendered
judgment
trial
judge
based
ruling
undue
delay
prior
indictment
matter
beyond
power
government
cure
since
permissible
ruling
motion
dismiss
rested
grounds
nothing
guilt
innocence
truth
allegations
indictment
rather
plea
nature
confession
avoidance
defendant
deny
committed
acts
alleged
acts
crime
instead
pleads
prosecuted
extraneous
factor
running
statute
limitations
denial
speedy
trial
see
weller
motion
rested
constitutional
grounds
exclusively
neither
motion
arguments
counsel
oral
opinion
judgment
mentioned
federal
rule
criminal
procedure
ground
dismissal
jurisdiction
hear
appeal
satisfactorily
established
ii
appellees
claim
sixth
amendment
violated
delay
return
indictment
dismissal
instead
claim
rights
speedy
trial
violated
period
approximately
three
years
end
criminal
scheme
charged
return
indictment
argued
delay
substantial
inherently
prejudicial
sixth
amendment
required
dismissal
indictment
view
however
sixth
amendment
speedy
trial
provision
application
putative
defendant
way
becomes
accused
event
occurred
case
appellees
indicted
april
sixth
amendment
provides
criminal
prosecutions
accused
shall
enjoy
right
speedy
public
trial
face
protection
amendment
activated
criminal
prosecution
begun
extends
persons
accused
course
prosecution
provisions
seem
afford
protection
yet
accused
seem
require
government
discover
investigate
accuse
person
within
particular
period
time
amendment
appear
guarantee
criminal
defendant
government
move
dispatch
appropriate
assure
early
proper
disposition
charges
essential
ingredient
orderly
expedition
mere
speed
smith
attention
called
nothing
circumstances
surrounding
adoption
amendment
indicating
mean
appears
say
marginal
support
proposition
time
adoption
amendment
prevailing
rule
prosecutions
permitted
long
delay
presenting
charge
framers
hardly
selected
less
appropriate
language
intended
speedy
trial
provision
protect
delay
opinions
intimate
support
appellees
thesis
courts
appeals
considered
question
constitutional
terms
never
reversed
conviction
dismissed
indictment
solely
basis
sixth
amendment
speedy
trial
provision
delay
involved
legislative
efforts
implement
federal
state
speedy
trial
provisions
also
plainly
reveal
view
guarantees
applicable
person
accused
crime
pointed
common
law
absence
special
statutes
limitations
mere
failure
find
indictment
operate
discharge
accused
offense
nolle
prosequi
entered
government
failure
grand
jury
indict
cadarr
since
doubtless
true
cases
power
government
abused
charges
kept
hanging
heads
citizens
committed
unreasonable
periods
resulting
hardship
noted
many
ith
view
preventing
wrong
citizen
aid
constitutional
provisions
national
state
intended
secure
accused
speedy
trial
passed
statutes
limiting
time
within
trial
must
occur
charge
indictment
characteristically
statutes
referred
triggered
citizen
charged
accused
statutes
vary
greatly
substance
structure
interpretation
common
denominator
event
right
speedy
trial
arise
charge
arrest
even
though
prosecuting
authorities
knowledge
offense
long
note
right
speedy
trial
rev
federal
statute
general
applicability
enacted
congress
enforce
speedy
trial
provision
sixth
amendment
federal
rule
criminal
procedure
force
law
authorizes
dismissal
indictment
information
complaint
unnecessary
delay
presenting
charge
grand
jury
filing
information
defendant
held
answer
district
unnecessary
delay
bringing
defendant
trial
rule
clearly
limited
situations
appellees
position
therefore
odds
longstanding
legislative
judicial
constructions
speedy
trial
provisions
national
state
constitutions
iii
apparent
also
little
support
appellees
position
emerges
consideration
purposes
sixth
amendment
speedy
trial
provision
guarantee
termed
important
safeguard
prevent
undue
oppressive
incarceration
prior
trial
minimize
anxiety
concern
accompanying
public
accusation
limit
possibilities
long
delay
impair
ability
accused
defend
ewell
see
also
klopfer
north
carolina
dickey
florida
inordinate
delay
arrest
indictment
trial
may
impair
defendant
ability
present
effective
defense
major
evils
protected
speedy
trial
guarantee
exist
quite
apart
actual
possible
prejudice
accused
defense
legally
arrest
detain
government
must
assert
probable
cause
believe
arrestee
committed
crime
arrest
public
act
may
seriously
interfere
defendant
liberty
whether
free
bail
may
disrupt
employment
drain
financial
resources
curtail
associations
subject
public
obloquy
create
anxiety
family
friends
considerations
substantial
underpinnings
decision
klopfer
north
carolina
supra
see
also
smith
hooey
viewed
readily
understandable
either
formal
indictment
information
else
actual
restraints
imposed
arrest
holding
answer
criminal
charge
engage
particular
protections
speedy
trial
provision
sixth
amendment
invocation
speedy
trial
provision
thus
need
await
indictment
information
formal
charge
decline
extend
reach
amendment
period
prior
arrest
event
occurs
citizen
suffers
restraints
liberty
subject
public
accusation
situation
compare
defendant
arrested
held
answer
passage
time
whether
arrest
may
impair
memories
cause
evidence
lost
deprive
defendant
witnesses
otherwise
interfere
ability
defend
possibility
prejudice
trial
sufficient
reason
wrench
sixth
amendment
proper
context
possible
prejudice
inherent
delay
however
short
may
also
weaken
government
case
law
provided
mechanisms
guard
possible
distinguished
actual
prejudice
resulting
passage
time
crime
arrest
charge
said
ewell
supra
applicable
statute
limitations
primary
guarantee
bringing
overly
stale
criminal
charges
statutes
represent
legislative
assessments
relative
interests
state
defendant
administering
receiving
justice
made
repose
society
protection
may
limitation
lost
means
defense
public
schools
walker
wall
statutes
provide
predictability
specifying
limit
beyond
irrebuttable
presumption
defendant
right
fair
trial
prejudiced
observed
toussie
purpose
statute
limitations
limit
exposure
criminal
prosecution
certain
fixed
period
time
following
occurrence
acts
legislature
decided
punish
criminal
sanctions
limitation
designed
protect
individuals
defend
charges
basic
facts
may
become
obscured
passage
time
minimize
danger
official
punishment
acts
past
time
limit
may
also
salutary
effect
encouraging
law
enforcement
officials
promptly
investigate
suspected
criminal
activity
since
appellees
rely
potential
prejudice
passage
time
alleged
crime
indictment
see
part
iv
infra
perhaps
need
go
dispose
case
indictment
first
official
act
designating
appellees
accused
individuals
event
occurred
within
statute
limitations
nevertheless
since
criminal
trial
likely
consequence
judgment
since
appellees
may
claim
actual
prejudice
defense
appropriate
note
statute
limitations
fully
define
appellees
rights
respect
events
occurring
prior
indictment
thus
government
concedes
due
process
clause
fifth
amendment
require
dismissal
indictment
shown
trial
delay
case
caused
substantial
prejudice
appellees
rights
fair
trial
delay
intentional
device
gain
tactical
advantage
accused
cf
brady
maryland
napue
illinois
however
need
determine
circumstances
actual
prejudice
resulting
delays
requires
dismissal
prosecution
actual
prejudice
defense
criminal
case
may
result
shortest
necessary
delay
one
suggests
every
detriment
defendant
case
abort
criminal
prosecution
accommodate
sound
administration
justice
rights
defendant
fair
trial
necessarily
involve
delicate
judgment
based
circumstances
case
unwise
juncture
attempt
forecast
decision
cases
iv
case
us
neither
appellee
arrested
charged
otherwise
subjected
formal
restraint
prior
indictment
event
therefore
transformed
appellees
accused
defendants
subject
speedy
trial
protections
sixth
amendment
delay
end
scheme
charged
indictment
date
defendants
indicted
extend
beyond
period
applicable
statute
limitations
appellees
course
able
claim
undue
delay
pending
trial
since
indictment
brought
april
dismissed
june
appellees
adequately
demonstrated
delay
government
violated
due
process
clause
actual
prejudice
conduct
defense
alleged
proved
showing
government
intentionally
delayed
gain
tactical
advantage
appellees
harass
appellees
rely
solely
real
possibility
prejudice
inherent
extended
delay
memories
dim
witnesses
become
inaccessible
evidence
lost
light
applicable
statute
limitations
however
possibilities
enough
demonstrate
appellees
receive
fair
trial
therefore
justify
dismissal
indictment
events
trial
may
demonstrate
actual
prejudice
present
time
appellees
due
process
claims
speculative
premature
reversed
footnotes
criminal
appeals
act
supp
time
appeal
provided
relevant
part
appeal
may
taken
behalf
district
courts
direct
criminal
cases
following
instances
decision
judgment
sustaining
motion
bar
defendant
put
jeopardy
omnibus
crime
control
act
stat
amended
criminal
appeals
act
read
pertinent
part
follows
criminal
case
appeal
shall
lie
appeals
decision
judgment
order
district
dismissing
indictment
information
one
counts
except
appeal
shall
lie
double
jeopardy
clause
constitution
prohibits
prosecution
amendment
thus
terminated
appellate
jurisdiction
government
appeals
district
judgments
federal
criminal
cases
pending
cases
affected
amendment
however
since
subsection
provides
amendments
made
section
shall
apply
respect
criminal
case
begun
district
effective
date
section
omnibus
crime
control
act
took
effect
january
appellees
case
indicted
april
rule
provides
unnecessary
delay
presenting
charge
grand
jury
filing
information
defendant
held
answer
district
unnecessary
delay
bringing
defendant
trial
may
dismiss
indictment
information
complaint
event
doubtful
rule
applies
circumstances
case
indictment
first
formal
act
criminal
prosecution
appellees
see
cases
cited
infra
history
speedy
trial
provision
sparse
unilluminating
respect
issue
us
see
heller
sixth
amendment
constitution
rutland
birth
bill
rights
brant
bill
rights
dumbauld
state
precedents
bill
rights
pub
note
right
speedy
trial
stan
rev
single
case
antedates
bill
rights
rex
robinson
black
eng
three
century
british
cases
rex
marshall
east
eng
regina
hext
jurist
regina
robins
cox
somerset
winter
assizes
cited
proposition
framers
intended
protect
delay
enacting
sixth
amendment
cases
fail
establish
definite
rule
founders
sought
constitutionalize
however
government
argument
concerning
history
sixth
amendment
dispositive
persuasive
brief
government
points
habeas
corpus
act
car
provided
speedy
relief
persons
imprisoned
criminal
supposed
criminal
matters
required
persons
jailed
felonies
treason
brought
trial
upon
motion
within
two
terms
discharged
bail
act
allude
delay
arrest
ratified
bill
rights
either
adopted
british
act
passed
similar
law
petition
provoo
md
aff
sub
nom
provoo
many
speedy
trial
provisions
constitutions
modeled
british
act
article
virginia
declaration
rights
may
model
madison
used
sixth
amendment
rutland
supra
secured
right
speedy
trial
criminal
prosecutions
man
hath
right
demand
cause
nature
accusation
see
generally
heller
supra
insofar
meager
evidence
probative
seems
imply
sixth
amendment
designed
assure
accused
crimes
trial
without
undue
delay
interpreted
sixth
amendment
speedy
trial
guarantee
small
number
cases
see
dickey
florida
smith
hooey
klopfer
north
carolina
ewell
pollard
provoo
supra
beavers
haubert
see
also
smith
courts
appeals
recognized
sixth
amendment
right
speedy
trial
prosecution
formally
initiated
held
sole
safeguard
delay
relevant
statute
limitations
feinberg
carlo
cert
denied
pitts
north
carolina
durham
kroll
cert
denied
grayson
wilson
cert
denied
donnell
harlow
cert
denied
bruce
cert
denied
hoopengarner
harris
lothridge
parker
cert
denied
edmaiston
neil
panczko
terlikowski
cert
denied
foley
benson
venus
rev
per
curiam
grounds
cert
denied
reed
cert
denied
sub
nom
sartain
nickens
app
cert
denied
courts
appeals
stated
delay
may
cause
dismissal
seemed
treat
question
primarily
one
due
process
although
sixth
amendment
occasionally
mentioned
required
showing
actual
prejudice
schlinsky
fleming
capaldo
cert
denied
simmons
cert
denied
holiday
hammond
dickerson
rivera
sanchez
harbin
lee
cert
denied
napue
cert
denied
lucas
sanchez
cert
denied
acree
although
petition
provoo
md
aff
sub
nom
provoo
sometimes
cited
proposition
delay
justify
dismissal
district
explicitly
stated
considered
delay
relevant
issue
whether
defendant
denied
fair
trial
taylor
app
conviction
vacated
delay
crime
housebreaking
trial
years
delay
crime
indictment
defendant
prison
another
charge
time
defendant
substantially
prejudiced
ability
defend
housebreaking
charge
appeals
stated
rely
mere
lapse
time
commission
offenses
date
indictment
considered
governed
statute
limitations
combination
factors
set
forth
delay
prejudice
motivates
decision
three
instances
district
courts
held
however
delay
sixth
amendment
purposes
must
computed
time
crime
time
government
considers
defendants
actions
criminal
dismissed
indictments
excessive
delay
parrott
supp
dc
wahrer
supp
alaska
burke
supp
dc
unique
line
cases
district
columbia
circuit
concerning
delay
narcotics
cases
government
relies
secret
informers
frequently
single
transactions
cases
take
rigid
stance
delays
based
appeals
purported
supervisory
jurisdiction
sixth
amendment
see
ross
app
bey
app
powell
app
tynan
app
explicitly
limiting
ross
provision
dealt
cadarr
district
columbia
code
adopted
congress
stat
section
provided
person
charged
criminal
offense
shall
committed
held
bail
grand
jury
must
act
within
specified
time
accused
set
free
provision
remains
present
code
stat
purport
reach
behind
time
charge
commitment
holding
bail
see
rev
stat
tit
cal
pen
code
code
ann
rev
stat
comprehensive
list
state
statutes
appears
american
bar
association
project
standards
criminal
justice
speedy
trial
approved
draft
administrative
board
judicial
conference
state
new
york
recently
promulgated
rules
trial
delay
detention
cover
defendants
held
custody
begin
computation
delay
periods
date
arrest
rule
new
york
law
journal
april
see
generally
note
right
speedy
trial
stan
rev
note
delay
evolving
due
process
standards
rev
note
constitutional
limits
delay
iowa
rev
note
lagging
right
speedy
trial
rev
note
justice
overdue
speedy
trial
potential
defendant
stan
rev
rules
second
circuit
en
banc
recently
adopted
ex
rel
frizer
mcmann
appear
appendix
may
supp
require
trial
within
specified
period
apply
persons
held
jail
prior
trial
defendants
criminal
cases
rule
rule
provides
cases
government
must
ready
trial
within
six
months
date
arrest
service
summons
detention
filing
complaint
formal
charge
upon
defendant
tried
sealed
indictment
whichever
earliest
see
generally
comment
speedy
trials
second
circuit
rules
regarding
prompt
disposition
criminal
cases
rev
cf
also
bill
intended
give
effect
sixth
amendment
right
speedy
trial
persons
charged
offenses
protections
bill
engaged
within
sixty
days
date
defendant
arrested
summons
issued
except
information
indictment
filed
within
sixty
days
date
filing
nickens
supra
harlow
supra
hoopengarner
supra
hoffa
supp
sd
standards
relating
speedy
trial
supra
aba
defined
time
beginning
delay
period
computed
date
charge
filed
except
defendant
continuously
held
custody
bail
recognizance
date
answer
crime
crime
based
conduct
arising
criminal
episode
time
trial
commence
running
date
held
answer
rule
aba
standards
defendant
charged
contemplated
right
speedy
trial
measured
statutory
time
period
excluding
necessary
justifiable
delays
necessity
allege
show
prejudice
defense
rule
ibid
extending
sixth
amendment
right
period
prior
indictment
holding
answer
also
create
procedural
problems
hile
rights
may
violated
delay
arrest
charge
follow
time
trial
counted
date
inaction
preceding
filing
charge
holding
defendant
answer
recognize
general
speedy
trial
right
commencing
time
arrest
charging
possible
unfortunate
consequences
operation
criminal
justice
system
allowing
inquiry
police
arrested
prosecutor
charged
raise
difficult
problems
proof
one
said
engaged
lengthy
hearings
every
case
determine
whether
prosecuting
authorities
proceeded
diligently
otherwise
port
crim
nd
june
quoted
note
justice
overdue
speedy
trial
potential
defendant
stan
rev
commentary
rule
speedy
trial
supra
indicated
criminal
statutes
limitation
liberally
interpreted
favor
repose
habig
policies
behind
civil
statutes
limitation
many
ways
similar
represent
public
policy
privilege
litigate
chase
securities
donaldson
underlying
rationale
encourage
promptness
bringing
actions
parties
shall
suffer
loss
evidence
death
disappearance
witnesses
destruction
documents
failure
memory
missouri
kansas
texas
harriman
statutes
founded
upon
general
experience
mankind
claims
valid
usually
allowed
remain
neglected
riddlesbarger
hartford
insurance
wall
promote
justice
preventing
surprises
revival
claims
allowed
slumber
evidence
lost
memories
faded
witnesses
disappeared
order
railroad
telegraphers
railway
express
agency
primarily
designed
assure
fairness
defendants
ourts
relieved
burden
trying
stale
claims
plaintiff
slept
rights
burnett
new
york
central
criminal
law
area
statutes
represent
legislative
judgment
balance
equities
situation
involving
tardy
assertion
otherwise
valid
rights
theory
even
one
claim
unjust
put
adversary
notice
defend
within
period
limitation
right
free
stale
claims
time
comes
prevail
right
prosecute
order
railroad
telegraphers
railway
express
agency
supra
except
otherwise
expressly
provided
law
person
shall
prosecuted
tried
punished
offense
capital
unless
indictment
found
information
instituted
within
five
years
next
offense
shall
committed
brief
number
courts
appeals
considered
question
see
benson
schlinsky
supra
capaldo
supra
lee
wilson
supra
harbin
acree
supra
nickens
supra
cf
hoffa
constitutional
right
arrested
police
required
guess
peril
precise
moment
probable
cause
arrest
suspect
risking
violation
fourth
amendment
act
soon
violation
sixth
amendment
wait
long
law
enforcement
officers
constitutional
duty
call
halt
criminal
investigation
moment
minimum
evidence
establish
probable
cause
quantum
evidence
may
fall
far
short
amount
necessary
support
criminal
conviction
justice
douglas
justice
brennan
justice
marshall
join
concurring
result
assume
delay
case
occurred
indictment
returned
right
speedy
trial
impaired
indictment
dismissed
disagree
guarantee
apply
delay
stage
case
march
february
appellees
acting
allied
enterprises
sold
installed
home
intercom
fire
control
burglar
detection
devices
district
columbia
metropolitan
area
business
endeavors
soon
met
spate
lawsuits
seeking
recovery
consumer
fraud
february
brief
career
ended
order
entered
federal
trade
commission
public
notoriety
continued
surround
appellees
activities
series
articles
appearing
washington
post
september
october
business
mentioned
investigation
attorney
special
grand
jury
impaneled
october
investigate
consumer
fraud
however
return
indictment
appellees
sometime
summer
january
appellees
delivered
business
records
attorney
indictment
returned
april
indictment
charged
counts
mail
fraud
wire
fraud
transportation
falsely
made
securities
interstate
commerce
september
january
appellees
moved
dismiss
indictment
failure
commence
prosecution
within
time
satisfy
rights
due
process
law
speedy
trial
attorney
sought
excuse
delay
alleging
office
understaffed
time
given
priority
types
crimes
district
granted
appellees
motion
appealed
supp
majority
says
either
formal
indictment
information
else
actual
restraints
imposed
arrest
holding
answer
criminal
charge
engage
particular
protections
speedy
trial
provision
ante
sixth
amendment
sure
accused
shall
enjoy
right
speedy
public
trial
words
accused
understand
sixth
amendment
setting
mean
person
standing
complain
prosecutorial
delay
seeking
indictment
filing
information
right
speedy
trial
right
brought
trial
speedily
seem
relevant
delays
delays
much
made
history
sixth
amendment
indicating
speedy
trial
guarantee
application
delays
two
answers
proposition
first
british
courts
historically
consider
delay
condition
issuance
information
lord
mansfield
held
rex
robinson
black
eng
issuance
information
subject
time
limitations
delayed
delay
must
reasonably
accounted
regina
hext
jurist
information
refused
whole
term
passed
since
alleged
assault
took
place
accord
rex
marshall
east
eng
baron
alderson
said
regina
robins
cox
somerset
winter
assizes
delay
making
charge
bestiality
monstrous
put
man
trial
lapse
time
account
conduct
far
back
accuse
man
crime
next
day
may
enabled
bring
forward
servants
family
say
time
charge
preferred
year
clear
man
life
safe
prosecution
permitted
unjust
put
trial
right
speedy
trial
characterized
fundamental
rights
secured
sixth
amendment
klopfer
north
carolina
protects
several
demands
criminal
justice
prevention
undue
delay
oppressive
incarceration
prior
trial
reduction
anxiety
concern
accompanying
public
accusation
limiting
possibilities
long
delay
impair
ability
accused
defend
smith
hooey
see
also
people
prosser
right
also
serves
broader
interests
speedy
trial
clause
protects
societal
interests
well
accused
public
concerned
effective
prosecution
criminal
cases
restrain
guilty
crime
deter
contemplating
delay
may
impair
ability
accused
defend
may
reduce
capacity
government
prove
case
see
ponzi
fessenden
moreover
awaiting
trial
accused
large
may
become
fugitive
justice
commit
criminal
acts
greater
lapse
time
commission
offense
conviction
offender
less
deterrent
value
conviction
dickey
florida
brennan
concurring
impairment
ability
defend
oneself
may
become
acute
delays
stage
delays
may
result
loss
alibi
witnesses
destruction
material
evidence
blurring
memories
least
person
accused
specific
crime
devote
powers
recall
events
surrounding
alleged
occurrences
formal
accusation
however
state
may
proceed
methodically
build
case
prospective
defendant
proceeds
lose
duty
sixth
amendment
places
government
officials
proceed
expeditiously
criminal
prosecutions
little
meaning
officials
determine
duty
commence
sure
right
speedy
trial
necessarily
relative
consistent
delays
depends
upon
circumstances
beavers
haubert
precisely
right
relative
draw
line
condone
illegitimate
delays
whether
stage
decisions
support
limitations
right
speedy
trial
adopted
majority
conclusion
sixth
amendment
extend
period
prior
arrest
ante
miranda
arizona
held
necessary
police
advise
right
counsel
situation
person
taken
custody
otherwise
deprived
freedom
action
significant
way
case
like
present
one
dealt
one
rights
enumerated
sixth
amendment
accused
entitled
concerned
whether
arrest
indictment
necessary
person
accused
thus
entitled
sixth
amendment
protections
looked
instead
nature
event
effect
rights
involved
applied
miranda
rule
even
though
arrest
examination
suspect
bed
boarding
house
presence
officers
making
custody
orozco
texas
follow
approach
hold
right
speedy
trial
denied
years
unexplained
inexcusable
delay
dickey
florida
supra
similarly
demonstrates
wisdom
avoiding
today
mechanical
approach
application
basic
constitutional
guarantees
custody
unrelated
federal
charge
petitioner
identified
witness
robbery
petitioner
remained
federal
custody
state
seek
prosecute
september
moved
dismiss
detainer
warrant
lodged
information
filed
december
petitioner
tried
february
although
trial
took
place
less
two
months
filing
information
held
denial
right
speedy
trial
delay
seven
years
crime
information
concurring
opinion
justice
brennan
discussed
broader
questions
raised
case
governmental
delay
reasonable
clearly
deliberate
attempt
government
use
delay
harm
accused
governmental
delay
purposeful
oppressive
unjustifiable
may
true
governmental
delay
unnecessary
whether
intentional
negligent
origin
negligent
failure
government
ensure
speedy
trial
virtually
damaging
interests
protected
right
intentional
failure
negligence
cause
interest
necessarily
unaffected
common
concern
prevent
deliberate
misuse
criminal
process
public
officials
thus
crucial
question
determining
legitimacy
governmental
delay
may
whether
might
reasonably
avoided
whether
unnecessary
determine
necessity
governmental
delay
seem
important
consider
one
hand
intrinsic
importance
reason
delay
length
delay
potential
prejudice
interests
protected
safeguard
trivial
objective
almost
delay
reasonably
avoided
similarly
lengthy
delay
even
interest
realizing
important
objective
suspect
dismissing
indictment
district
said
appears
matters
complained
occurred
march
january
appears
matters
known
early
matter
common
knowledge
late
appears
reason
delay
justified
necessity
research
examination
delving
various
transactions
discovered
handled
much
much
sooner
certainly
probably
year
latest
early
defendants
indicted
counts
believe
carries
sentence
separate
distinct
transaction
justify
consecutive
sentences
nature
outrageous
scheme
allegations
believed
ability
remember
build
one
recollection
produce
necessary
defense
bound
seriously
prejudiced
delay
least
three
years
bringing
prosecution
brought
latest
early
therefore
views
lack
speedy
prosecution
case
grant
motion
dismiss
see
stephen
history
criminal
law
england
england
far
know
england
english
colonies
alone
prosecution
offenses
left
entirely
private
persons
public
officers
act
capacity
private
persons
hardly
legal
powers
beyond
belong
private
persons
annotated
version
inception
evolution
british
system
see
schwartz
cases
materials
professional
responsibility
administration
criminal
justice
nat
council
legal
clinics
judge
wright
recognized
concurring
opinion
nickens
app
indeed
suspect
may
special
disadvantage
complaint
indictment
arrest
purposefully
delayed
knowledge
criminal
charges
brought
innocent
man
reason
fix
memory
happenings
day
alleged
crime
memory
grows
dim
passage
time
witnesses
disappear
day
accused
becomes
less
able
make
defense
delay
government
case
already
hands
balance
advantage
shifts
favor
government
government
lags
constitutional
system
tactic
available
police
prosecutors
preprosecution
delay
result
loss
physical
evidence
unavailability
potential
witnesses
impairment
ability
prospective
defendant
witnesses
remember
events
question
indeed
possibility
prejudice
may
greater
cases
post
cases
typical
prospective
defendant
probably
unaware
fact
criminal
charges
eventually
brought
thus
reason
take
measures
preserve
memory
memories
witnesses
importance
considerations
becomes
clear
measured
state
ability
collect
document
evidence
carries
criminal
investigation
thereby
preserving
probative
firepower
time
eventual
arrest
causal
factor
also
present
preprosecution
delay
many
preprosecution
delays
caused
reluctance
government
terminate
undercover
investigation
knowledge
obtained
undercover
agent
used
basis
arrest
issuance
complaint
identity
agent
may
exposed
effectiveness
destroyed
consequently
government
often
delay
arresting
individual
case
complete
agent
still
obtaining
evidence
individuals
situation
government
made
deliberate
choice
supposed
advantage
advantage
arguably
sought
defendant
asserting
claim
fact
remains
advantage
arises
deliberate
avoidable
choice
part
authorities
note
stan
rev
district
judge
pointed
assistant
attorney
general
indicated
need
help
attorney
retreated
factual
assertion