hilton
pub
rys
argued
october
decided
december
respondent
south
carolina
public
railways
commission
state
agency
common
carrier
engaged
interstate
commerce
railroad
sued
state
federal
employers
liability
act
fela
employee
petitioner
hilton
alleged
injured
course
employment
result
commission
negligence
dismissing
complaint
ground
fela
authorize
damages
action
state
agency
even
suit
maintained
state
forum
trial
acknowledged
parden
terminal
railway
alabama
docks
interpreted
fela
permit
actions
held
effect
parden
overruled
subsequent
decisions
south
carolina
affirmed
held
fela
creates
cause
action
railroad
enforceable
state
pp
absent
sufficient
countervailing
justifications
departing
precedent
strong
considerations
favoring
adherence
stare
decicis
case
compel
reaffirm
parden
insofar
held
congress
used
phrase
common
carrier
railroad
describe
class
employers
subject
fela
terms
intended
include
railroads
weight
must
accorded
continued
acceptance
parden
holding
congress
almost
years
take
corrective
action
disagreed
holding
chosen
moreover
overruling
parden
require
extensive
legislative
response
many
including
south
carolina
specifically
excluded
railroad
workers
workers
compensation
coverage
assumption
fela
adequately
protects
workers
event
injuries
caused
employer
negligence
dislodge
settled
rights
expectations
employees
employers
acting
assumption
overruling
parden
also
throw
doubt
decisions
holding
entire
federal
scheme
railroad
regulation
applies
railroads
pp
decisions
subsequent
parden
require
depart
stare
decisis
case
welch
texas
dept
highways
public
transportation
held
jones
act
incorporates
fela
remedial
scheme
abrogate
eleventh
amendment
immunity
suit
federal
explicitly
reserved
question
whether
act
fela
congress
intended
create
cause
action
plurality
opinion
see
also
white
concurring
characterized
considered
rejected
aforementioned
arguments
following
stare
decisis
since
welch
neither
addressed
discussed
vital
consideration
today
decision
confer
immunity
state
suit
strip
fela
jones
act
protection
workers
welch
holding
treated
determinative
issue
presented
since
welch
statement
congress
may
abrogate
constitutionally
secured
immunity
making
intention
unmistakably
clear
statutory
language
made
context
establishing
rule
constitutional
law
based
eleventh
amendment
apply
state
courts
parden
effectively
overruled
michigan
dept
state
police
holding
state
person
suable
relied
part
lack
clear
statement
statute
congressional
intent
impose
liability
clear
statement
rule
per
se
rule
constitutional
law
ordinary
rule
statutory
construction
ibid
issue
case
pure
question
statutory
construction
stare
decicis
doctrine
compelling
thus
clear
statement
inquiry
need
made
need
decide
whether
fela
satisfies
standard
rule
event
prevail
stare
decisis
doctrine
applied
longstanding
statutory
construction
implicating
important
reliance
interests
clear
statement
rule
either
overcome
inapplicable
federal
statute
impose
liability
upon
supremacy
clause
makes
statute
law
every
state
fully
enforceable
state
courts
pp
kennedy
delivered
opinion
rehnquist
white
stevens
souter
joined
blackmun
concurred
judgment
filed
dissenting
opinion
scalia
joined
thomas
took
part
consideration
decision
case
robert
beckham
argued
cause
filed
briefs
petitioner
keating
simons
iii
argued
cause
filed
brief
respondent
robert
weinberg
walter
kamiat
laurence
gold
filed
brief
american
federation
labor
congress
industrial
organizations
amicus
curiae
urging
reversal
richard
ruda
filed
brief
national
governors
association
et
al
amici
curiae
urging
affirmance
justice
kennedy
delivered
opinion
case
must
decide
whether
federal
employers
liability
act
fela
stat
creates
cause
action
railroad
enforceable
state
hold
reaffirming
part
decision
parden
terminal
railway
alabama
docks
petitioner
kenneth
hilton
employee
south
carolina
public
railways
commission
commission
employees
common
carrier
engaged
interstate
commerce
railroad
agency
state
south
carolina
created
statute
hilton
alleges
injured
scope
course
employment
negligence
commission
cause
accident
case
us
commission
respondent
recover
injuries
petitioner
first
filed
fela
action
district
case
pending
announced
decision
welch
texas
dept
highways
public
transportation
held
jones
act
stat
app
abrogate
eleventh
amendment
immunity
jones
act
incorporates
remedial
scheme
fela
based
understanding
eleventh
amendment
immunity
jones
act
suits
apply
well
fela
petitioner
dismissed
federal
action
refiled
fela
suit
south
carolina
state
case
us
state
trial
dismissed
hilton
complaint
ground
fela
authorize
action
money
damages
agency
state
even
suit
maintained
state
forum
though
acknowledging
parden
terminal
railway
alabama
docks
supra
interpreted
fela
permit
actions
trial
said
parden
severely
limited
subsequent
decisions
app
pet
cert
held
parden
longer
good
law
ordered
action
dismissed
whereupon
hilton
appealed
south
carolina
appeal
pending
south
carolina
decided
freeman
south
carolina
public
railways
commission
addressing
issue
raised
case
freeman
held
fela
subject
liability
state
suits
trial
state
acknowledged
parden
holding
concluded
effect
overruled
subsequent
course
decisions
parden
held
fela
authorizes
suits
damages
railroads
entering
business
operating
railroad
state
waives
eleventh
amendment
immunity
suit
federal
latter
holding
overruled
welch
accord
recent
eleventh
amendment
jurisprudence
welch
explicit
declining
decide
whether
jones
act
fela
congress
intended
create
cause
action
plurality
opinion
see
also
white
concurring
words
welch
decision
disturb
statutory
construction
holding
parden
addressing
latter
issue
south
carolina
found
dispositive
decision
michigan
dept
state
police
suit
brought
state
state
officials
michigan
held
state
person
term
used
suable
statute
regardless
forum
suit
maintained
holding
relied
part
lack
clear
statement
statute
congressional
intent
impose
liability
state
freeman
decision
controlled
ruling
instant
case
south
carolina
read
hold
statute
interpreted
create
cause
action
money
damages
state
unless
contains
unmistakably
clear
language
showing
congress
intended
deciding
text
fela
language
conforming
standard
freeman
held
fela
subject
liability
petitioner
case
reached
south
carolina
affirmed
dismissal
action
per
curiam
opinion
citing
freeman
granted
certiorari
reverse
ii
analysis
ultimate
determination
case
controlled
informed
central
importance
stare
decisis
jurisprudence
respondent
asks
us
overrule
interpretation
first
enunciated
parden
congress
enacted
fela
used
phrase
common
carrier
railroad
describe
class
employers
subject
terms
intended
include
railroads
two
terms
ago
port
authority
feeney
assumed
applicability
fela
railroads
finding
defendant
bistate
compact
corporation
waived
eleventh
amendment
immunity
may
issue
whether
reexamine
longstanding
statutory
construction
strong
considerations
favoring
adherence
stare
decisis
circumstances
answer
question
must
time
time
recognized
doctrine
stare
decisis
fundamental
importance
rule
law
welch
supra
see
also
patterson
mclean
credit
union
burnet
coronado
oil
gas
brandeis
dissenting
adherence
precedent
promotes
stability
predictability
respect
judicial
authority
vasquez
hillery
reasons
depart
doctrine
stare
decisis
without
compelling
justification
arizona
rumsey
case
us
policies
favor
following
stare
decisis
far
outweigh
suggesting
departure
considerations
stare
decisis
special
force
area
statutory
interpretation
unlike
context
constitutional
interpretation
legislative
power
implicated
congress
remains
free
alter
done
patterson
supra
congress
almost
years
corrected
decision
parden
disagreed
chosen
accord
weight
continued
acceptance
earlier
holding
stare
decisis
added
force
legislature
public
sphere
citizens
private
realm
acted
reliance
previous
decision
instance
overruling
decision
dislodge
settled
rights
expectations
require
extensive
legislative
response
case
us
workers
compensation
laws
many
specifically
exclude
railroad
workers
coverage
assumption
fela
provides
adequate
protection
workers
see
supp
supp
west
counsel
respondent
case
conceded
oral
argument
petitioner
may
precluded
seeking
alternative
remedy
state
law
injuries
like
exclusion
south
carolina
law
overruling
parden
require
reexamine
statutes
meanwhile
putting
risk
employees
employers
acting
assumption
protected
event
injuries
caused
employer
negligence
overruling
parden
also
throw
doubt
previous
decisions
cases
holding
entire
federal
scheme
railroad
regulation
applies
railroads
california
safety
appliance
act
california
taylor
railway
labor
act
see
also
transportation
union
long
island
factors
weigh
favor
adhering
stare
decisis
find
sufficient
countervailing
justifications
departing
precedents
iii
respondent
argues
already
considered
rejected
arguments
following
stare
decisis
welch
accurate
even
welch
controlling
characterization
welch
inaccurate
vital
consideration
decision
today
confer
immunity
state
suit
strip
fela
jones
act
protection
workers
employed
addressed
discussed
welch
decision
indeed
omission
best
explained
assumption
made
express
concurring
opinion
justice
white
jones
act
fela
terms
extends
coverage
jurisdiction
state
courts
entertain
suit
free
eleventh
amendment
constraints
plausible
explanation
absence
welch
discussion
practical
adverse
effects
overruling
portion
parden
pertained
eleventh
amendment
since
continued
state
jurisdiction
made
effects
minimal
treat
holding
welch
determinative
issue
presented
decision
explained
welch
supra
eleventh
amendment
cases
indeed
hold
congress
may
abrogate
constitutionally
secured
immunity
suit
federal
making
intention
unmistakably
clear
language
statute
atascadero
state
hospital
scanlon
emphasis
added
congressional
intent
abrogate
eleventh
amendment
immunity
must
expressed
text
statute
look
legislative
history
making
inquiry
dellmuth
muth
cases
establish
rule
constitutional
law
based
eleventh
amendment
rule
developed
parden
decision
found
welch
undercut
reasoning
parden
require
parden
eleventh
amendment
holding
overruled
stated
many
occasions
eleventh
amendment
apply
state
courts
citing
maine
thiboutot
nevada
hall
issue
becomes
pure
question
statutory
construction
doctrine
stare
decicis
compelling
respondent
argues
state
courts
case
said
statutory
construction
holding
parden
longer
good
law
later
opinion
supra
respondent
make
result
solely
function
eleventh
amendment
jurisprudence
reading
case
adopt
per
se
rule
prohibiting
interpretation
general
liability
language
include
absent
clear
statement
congress
effect
congress
intends
subject
cause
action
respondent
argues
light
considerations
led
us
partial
overruling
parden
welch
govern
think
argument
misconstrues
decision
import
entirety
eleventh
amendment
jurisprudence
area
statutory
construction
treated
eleventh
amendment
relevant
consideration
hafer
melo
primary
focus
language
history
dellmuth
muth
supra
adopted
per
se
rule
sort
advocated
respondent
entire
discussion
unnecessary
issue
case
different
issue
eleventh
amendment
cases
fundamental
respect
latter
cases
involve
application
rule
constitutional
law
former
cases
apply
ordinary
rule
statutory
construction
supra
conclusion
evident
discussions
eeoc
wyoming
gregory
ashcroft
last
term
cases
describe
plain
statement
rule
rule
statutory
construction
applied
statutory
intent
ambiguous
rather
rule
constitutional
law
neither
case
implicated
eleventh
amendment
distinction
draw
also
supported
decision
welch
particular
fact
welch
explicit
terms
reserved
statutory
construction
issue
resolve
today
issue
resolved
one
statutory
construction
congressional
intent
impose
monetary
liability
requirement
clear
statement
congress
impose
liability
creates
rule
assistance
congress
courts
drafting
interpreting
legislation
requirement
also
serves
make
parallel
two
separate
inquiries
state
liability
eleventh
amendment
doctrine
canons
statutory
interpretation
cases
gregory
ashcroft
rule
followed
resulting
symmetry
making
state
liability
immunity
case
may
federal
state
courts
much
commend
also
avoids
concerns
arise
national
government
uses
state
courts
exclusive
forum
permit
recovery
congressional
statute
inconsequential
argument
symmetry
law
esthetics
predictability
order
symmetry
imperative
must
override
expectations
rest
upon
predictability
order
stare
decisis
case
us
clear
statement
inquiry
need
made
need
decide
whether
fela
satisfies
standard
rule
event
prevail
doctrine
stare
decisis
applied
longstanding
statutory
construction
implicating
important
reliance
interests
rule
either
overcome
inapplicable
federal
statute
impose
liability
upon
supremacy
clause
makes
statute
law
every
state
fully
enforceable
state
howlett
rose
iv
reasons
stated
judgment
south
carolina
reversed
case
remanded
proceedings
inconsistent
opinion
ordered
justice
thomas
took
part
consideration
decision
case
justice
blackmun
concurs
judgment
footnotes
every
common
carrier
railroad
engaging
commerce
shall
liable
damages
person
suffering
injury
employed
carrier
commerce
specific
statutory
construction
issue
reserved
welch
precise
issue
today
rather
whether
language
jones
act
seaman
shall
suffer
personal
injury
course
employment
app
correctly
interpreted
petty
bridge
afford
remedy
justice
white
concurrence
welch
texas
dept
highways
public
transportation
focused
question
stating
congress
disturbed
construction
understand
purport
parties
however
agree
resolution
issue
jones
act
fela
thus
assume
purposes
decision
justice
justice
scalia
joins
dissenting
decision
case
example
truism
hard
cases
make
bad
law
understandable
reluctance
leave
petitioner
without
remedy
leads
contort
confuse
clear
statement
doctrine
articulated
recent
opinions
reason
respectfully
dissent
invokes
stare
decisis
time
running
headlong
away
view
case
cleanly
resolved
applying
two
recent
precedents
michigan
dept
state
police
welch
texas
dept
highways
public
transportation
rehabilitating
decision
largely
repudiated
parden
terminal
railway
alabama
docks
held
congress
intends
upset
usual
constitutional
balance
federal
government
must
make
intention
unmistakably
clear
supra
quoting
atascadero
state
hospital
scanlon
determined
case
federal
statute
requiring
entertain
damages
suits
state
courts
precisely
kind
legislation
requires
clear
statement
principle
state
normally
sued
courts
without
consent
supra
welch
held
language
jones
act
applied
federal
employers
liability
act
fela
remedial
provisions
seamen
amount
clear
statement
congress
intent
abrogate
eleventh
amendment
sovereign
immunity
holding
expressly
stated
extent
parden
terminal
railway
inconsistent
requirement
abrogation
eleventh
amendment
immunity
congress
must
expressed
unmistakably
clear
language
overruled
result
case
follow
fortiori
reasoning
welch
already
decided
clear
statement
necessary
state
may
required
entertain
damages
suits
courts
already
decided
fela
language
amount
clear
statement
congress
intent
abrogate
state
sovereign
immunity
stare
decisis
dictates
follow
rules
laid
welch
revive
substantially
discredited
case
litigants
lower
courts
every
reason
think
defunct
ii
tries
drive
wedge
welch
characterizing
former
statutory
interpretation
case
latter
constitutional
case
clear
statement
rule
says
required
welch
eleventh
amendment
implicated
contrast
use
clear
statement
rule
somewhat
discretionary
issue
case
question
statutory
interpretation
constitution
implicated
see
ante
case
involves
state
sovereign
immunity
state
federal
eleventh
amendment
terms
apply
holds
clear
statement
rule
nonconstitutional
context
trumped
stare
decisis
distinction
untenable
clear
statement
rule
mere
canon
statutory
interpretation
instead
derives
constitution
rule
protects
balance
power
federal
government
struck
constitution
although
eleventh
amendment
spells
one
aspect
balance
power
principle
federalism
underlying
amendment
pervades
constitutional
structure
constitution
gives
congress
limited
power
govern
nation
retain
power
govern
locally
see
dellmuth
muth
brogation
sovereign
immunity
upsets
fundamental
constitutional
balance
federal
government
placing
considerable
strain
principles
federalism
inform
eleventh
amendment
quoting
atascadero
state
hospital
scanlon
supra
pennhurst
state
school
hospital
halderman
recognizing
basic
truth
governmental
structure
constitution
wary
extending
effect
congressional
enactments
areas
traditionally
governed
unless
congress
directed
us
unmistakably
clear
statement
indeed
cases
employed
clear
statement
rule
outside
eleventh
amendment
context
recognized
rule
constitutional
dimensions
gregory
ashcroft
plain
statement
rule
nothing
acknowledgment
retain
substantial
sovereign
powers
constitutional
scheme
powers
congress
readily
interfere
congress
intends
alter
usual
constitutional
balance
federal
government
must
make
intention
unmistakably
clear
language
statute
quoting
atascadero
state
hospital
scanlon
supra
bass
clear
statement
rule
rooted
concepts
american
federalism
thus
position
required
employ
clear
statement
rule
context
ignores
constitutional
source
rule
eleventh
amendment
spells
one
instance
one
respect
forbearance
due
national
state
governments
respect
cements
federation
constitution
clear
statement
rule
assumes
congress
show
respect
lightly
abridging
powers
sovereignty
retained
standpoint
makes
little
sense
apply
clear
statement
rule
congressional
enactments
make
liable
damages
suits
federal
courts
apply
clear
statement
rule
congressional
enactments
make
liable
damages
suits
courts
sovereign
immunity
crucial
attribute
separate
governments
infringed
cases
suggested
dichotomy
makes
even
less
sense
consider
remarkable
anomaly
two
canons
statutory
construction
create
statutory
scheme
state
courts
exclusive
avenue
obtaining
recovery
federal
statute
iii
gives
guidance
lower
courts
apply
clear
statement
rule
obscurity
point
little
goals
stability
predictability
assertedly
drive
analysis
says
stare
decisis
prevail
clear
statement
rule
congress
manifested
acquiescence
statutory
interpretation
silence
citizens
acted
reliance
previous
decision
ante
yet
previously
applied
clear
statement
rule
despite
presence
considerations
four
years
ago
held
congress
manifest
consent
allow
sued
fela
damages
federal
despite
congressional
silence
face
holding
parden
welch
texas
dept
highways
public
transportation
intervening
four
years
make
likely
congress
silently
consented
remaining
encroachment
upon
state
sovereignty
parden
sanctioned
long
must
congress
remain
silent
declare
constructive
consent
statutory
interpretation
suggestion
cases
better
divine
congress
change
balance
power
federal
government
listening
congressional
silence
clear
legislative
statement
substitutes
telepathy
statutory
interpretation
deciding
ignore
requirements
clear
statement
rule
also
considers
extent
citizens
relied
past
decisions
analysis
looks
reliance
employees
may
without
remedy
fela
apply
state
employers
standpoint
however
ignores
fact
generally
assume
waive
right
challenge
abrogation
traditional
authority
acquiesced
even
relied
longstanding
congressional
regulation
see
welch
constructive
consent
suit
sufficient
reliance
exception
clear
statement
rule
thus
reinstates
theory
constructive
waiver
sovereign
immunity
cases
repeatedly
rejected
see
ibid
atascadero
state
hospital
scanlon
port
authority
feeney
sum
newly
created
exception
clear
statement
rule
threatens
eliminate
altogether
except
eleventh
amendment
sovereign
immunity
abrogated
federal
difficult
impossible
lower
courts
know
apply
rule
interpreting
statutes
upset
traditional
balance
state
federal
government
outside
context
eleventh
amendment
immunity
iv
fears
strict
application
precedent
require
clear
statement
congressional
regulation
state
railroads
ante
fear
well
founded
clear
statement
doctrine
recently
articulated
gregory
requires
clear
statement
congress
assume
intends
alter
usual
constitutional
balance
power
areas
traditionally
regulated
gregory
traditionally
regulated
liability
damages
suits
traditionally
regulated
interstate
railroads
see
wabash
illinois
transportation
union
long
island
clear
statement
rule
context
applies
fela
provides
cause
action
damages
apply
congressional
regulation
state
railroads
application
clear
statement
rule
overrule
port
authority
feeney
supra
feeney
held
state
waive
sovereign
immunity
suit
consent
damages
action
fela
feeney
underlying
assumption
course
congress
intended
include
railroads
class
appropriate
fela
defendants
within
contemplated
category
defendants
consent
suit
create
cause
action
entity
congress
subjected
liability
howlett
rose
welch
hold
railroads
owned
outside
fela
category
common
carrier
railroad
however
fact
welch
never
clarified
count
context
fela
clear
statement
congressional
intent
submit
damages
suits
aspect
state
sovereignty
stake
immunity
damages
suits
clear
statement
required
tailored
concern
see
gregory
ashcroft
application
federal
statute
change
state
law
respect
tenure
state
judges
clear
statement
rule
tailored
question
whether
congress
intended
statute
apply
state
judges
whether
congress
intended
statute
apply
generally
clear
statement
context
statement
congress
intended
abrogate
immunity
suit
dellmuth
muth
congress
clearly
wanted
common
carrier
railroad
subject
suit
fela
railroad
owners
clearly
within
contemplated
category
defendants
congress
however
clearly
say
whether
intended
force
happen
also
railroad
owners
submit
suit
without
consent
indeed
quite
doubtful
congress
thought
power
create
causes
action
fela
enacted
see
welch
supra
scalia
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
since
enacting
fela
congress
clearly
stated
wishes
abrogate
state
immunity
suit
said
wishes
provide
damages
remedy
employees
common
carrier
railroad
state
proper
defendant
consents
sued
fela
capacity
railroad
owner
unless
state
agrees
treated
railroad
owner
instead
sovereign
may
sued
without
consent
south
carolina
agreed
throw
mantle
sovereign
immunity
may
sued
fela
therefore
affirm
judgment
south
carolina
concern
south
carolina
public
railways
commission
employees
without
remedy
determine
result
case
clarified
doctrine
instead
obfuscating
allow
compensation
schemes
fill
void
left
fela
quickly
assume
south
carolina
callously
ignore
fate
workers
certainly
south
carolina
stake
seeing
employees
compensated
congress
instead
avoiding
implications
previous
decisions
adhere
holding
premised
fairness
unfair
courts
parties
must
parse
doctrine
applying
clear
statement
rule
therefore
respectfully
dissent