estelle
williams
argued
october
decided
may
respondent
charged
criminal
offense
held
custody
awaiting
trial
asked
jail
officer
morning
trial
civilian
clothes
wear
trial
action
taken
voir
dire
counsel
expressly
referred
respondent
jail
attire
time
ensuing
jury
trial
issue
raised
trial
judge
concerning
jail
attire
respondent
whose
conviction
upheld
appeal
sought
federal
habeas
corpus
district
denied
relief
appeals
reversed
though
evidence
county
trial
occurred
majority
nonbailed
defendants
tried
jail
clothes
evidence
practice
followed
timely
objection
made
trial
judge
practice
particular
trial
judge
permit
accused
desired
tried
civilian
garb
held
although
state
consistent
fourteenth
amendment
compel
accused
stand
trial
jury
dressed
identifiable
prison
clothes
failure
make
objection
tried
clothes
negates
presence
compulsion
necessary
establish
constitutional
violation
nothing
record
warrants
conclusion
respondent
compelled
stand
trial
jail
garb
sufficient
reason
excuse
failure
raise
issue
trial
pp
reversed
remanded
burger
delivered
opinion
stewart
white
blackmun
powell
rehnquist
joined
powell
filed
concurring
opinion
stewart
joined
post
brennan
filed
dissenting
opinion
marshall
joined
post
stevens
took
part
consideration
decision
case
dunklin
sullivan
assistant
attorney
general
texas
argued
cause
petitioner
brief
john
hill
attorney
general
david
kendall
first
assistant
attorney
general
joe
dibrell
lonny
zwiener
assistant
attorneys
general
ben
aderholt
appointment
argued
cause
filed
brief
respondent
reporter
note
aderholt
represented
respondent
cf
post
chief
justice
burger
delivered
opinion
granted
certiorari
case
determine
whether
accused
compelled
wear
identifiable
prison
clothing
trial
jury
denied
due
process
equal
protection
laws
november
respondent
williams
convicted
state
harris
county
assault
intent
commit
murder
malice
crime
occurred
altercation
respondent
former
landlord
latter
property
evidence
showed
respondent
returned
apartment
complex
formerly
resided
visit
female
tenant
respondent
former
landlord
became
involved
quarrel
heated
words
exchanged
fight
ensued
respondent
struck
landlord
knife
neck
chest
abdomen
severely
wounding
unable
post
bond
respondent
held
custody
awaiting
trial
learned
go
trial
respondent
asked
officer
jail
civilian
clothes
request
denied
result
respondent
appeared
trial
clothes
distinctly
marked
prison
issue
neither
respondent
counsel
raised
objection
prison
attire
time
jury
returned
verdict
guilty
charge
assault
intent
murder
malice
texas
criminal
appeals
affirmed
conviction
williams
state
williams
sought
release
district
petition
writ
habeas
corpus
although
holding
requiring
defendant
stand
trial
prison
garb
inherently
unfair
district
denied
relief
ground
error
harmless
appeals
reversed
basis
prior
holding
hernandez
beto
cert
denied
fifth
circuit
disagreed
district
solely
issue
harmless
error
right
fair
trial
fundamental
liberty
secured
fourteenth
amendment
drope
missouri
presumption
innocence
although
articulated
constitution
basic
component
fair
trial
system
criminal
justice
long
ago
stated
principle
presumption
innocence
favor
accused
undoubted
law
axiomatic
elementary
enforcement
lies
foundation
administration
criminal
law
coffin
actual
impact
particular
practice
judgment
jurors
always
fully
determined
left
doubt
probability
deleterious
effects
fundamental
rights
calls
close
judicial
scrutiny
estes
texas
murchison
courts
must
best
evaluate
likely
effects
particular
procedure
based
reason
principle
common
human
experience
potential
effects
presenting
accused
jury
prison
attire
need
however
measured
abstract
courts
exceptions
determined
accused
compelled
go
trial
prison
jail
clothing
possible
impairment
presumption
basic
adversary
system
gaito
brierley
hernandez
beto
supra
brooks
texas
commonwealth
keeler
super
miller
state
ark
people
shaw
people
zapata
cal
app
cal
rptr
cert
denied
eaddy
people
american
bar
association
standards
criminal
justice
also
disapprove
practice
aba
project
standards
criminal
justice
trial
jury
app
draft
recognition
constant
reminder
accused
condition
implicit
distinctive
identifiable
attire
may
affect
juror
judgment
defendant
clothing
likely
continuing
influence
throughout
trial
unlike
placing
jury
custody
deputy
sheriffs
also
witnesses
prosecution
unacceptable
risk
presented
impermissible
factors
coming
play
turner
louisiana
factors
always
avoided
manifest
illinois
allen
expressly
recognized
sight
shackles
gags
might
significant
effect
jury
feelings
defendant
yet
upheld
practice
necessary
control
contumacious
defendant
reason
authorized
removal
disruptive
defendant
courtroom
alternatively
binding
gagging
accused
agrees
conduct
properly
courtroom
unlike
physical
restraints
permitted
allen
supra
compelling
accused
wear
jail
clothing
furthers
essential
state
policy
may
convenient
jail
administrators
factor
quite
unlike
substantial
need
impose
physical
restraints
upon
contumacious
defendants
provides
justification
practice
indeed
state
texas
asserts
interest
whatever
maintaining
procedure
similarly
troubling
fact
compelling
accused
stand
trial
jail
grab
operates
usually
post
bail
prior
trial
persons
secure
release
subjected
condition
impose
condition
one
category
defendants
objection
repugnant
concept
equal
justice
embodied
fourteenth
amendment
griffin
illinois
fifth
circuit
well
prior
decisions
purported
adopt
per
se
rule
invalidating
convictions
defendant
appeared
identifiable
prison
clothes
held
instance
doctrine
applicable
line
cases
see
also
thomas
beto
cert
denied
hernandez
beto
supra
courts
accord
bentley
crist
watt
page
cert
denied
case
appeals
quoted
language
justice
douglas
speaking
harrington
california
held
chapman
california
federal
constitutional
error
held
harmless
must
able
declare
belief
harmless
beyond
reasonable
doubt
said
trial
errors
violate
constitution
automatically
call
reversal
citations
omitted
urged
petitioners
hold
federal
constitutional
errors
regardless
facts
circumstances
must
always
deemed
harmful
holding
petitioners
correctly
point
require
automatic
reversal
convictions
make
discussion
unnecessary
decline
adopt
rule
statutes
rules
long
ago
congress
established
courts
rule
judgments
shall
reversed
errors
defects
affect
substantial
rights
parties
conclude
may
constitutional
errors
setting
particular
case
unimportant
insignificant
may
consistent
federal
constitution
deemed
harmless
requiring
automatic
reversal
conviction
citation
omitted
different
result
may
appropriate
defendant
trial
offense
allegedly
committed
prison
jury
learn
incarceration
event
consequently
courts
refused
embrace
mechanical
rule
vitiating
conviction
regardless
circumstances
accused
appeared
jury
prison
garb
instead
recognized
particular
evil
proscribed
compelling
defendant
tried
jail
attire
reason
judicial
focus
upon
compulsion
simple
instances
frequently
arise
defendant
prefers
stand
trial
peers
prison
garments
cases
show
example
uncommon
defense
tactic
produce
defendant
jail
clothes
hope
eliciting
sympathy
jury
anderson
watt
watt
page
supra
cf
garcia
beto
apparently
accepted
practice
texas
courts
barber
state
tex
crim
app
including
respondent
tried
courts
therefore
required
accused
object
tried
jail
garments
must
invoke
abandon
rights
fifth
circuit
held
defendant
may
remain
silent
willingly
go
trial
prison
garb
thereafter
claim
error
hernandez
beto
essential
meaning
appeals
decision
hernandez
described
follows
held
hernandez
defendant
attorney
burden
make
known
defendant
desired
tried
civilian
clothes
state
accountable
tried
jail
clothes
ex
rel
stahl
henderson
record
clear
objection
made
trial
judge
concerning
jail
attire
either
time
trial
omission
plainly
result
lack
appreciation
issue
respondent
raised
question
jail
attendant
prior
trial
trial
defense
counsel
expressly
referred
respondent
attire
voir
dire
trial
judge
thus
informed
respondent
counsel
fully
conscious
situation
despite
respondent
failure
raise
issue
trial
appeals
held
waiver
objection
inferred
merely
failure
object
trial
prison
garb
customary
jurisdiction
however
analysis
ignores
essential
facts
adduced
evidentiary
hearing
notwithstanding
evidence
general
practice
harris
county
finding
nonbailed
defendants
compelled
stand
trial
prison
garments
timely
objection
made
trial
judge
contrary
district
concluded
practice
particular
judge
presiding
respondent
case
permit
accused
desired
change
civilian
clothes
doubt
judge
practice
allowing
defendants
stand
trial
civilian
clothing
requested
practice
evidently
followed
certain
judges
well
williams
beto
supp
significantly
evidentiary
hearing
respondent
trial
counsel
intimate
feared
adverse
consequences
attending
objection
procedure
nothing
suggest
prejudicial
effect
defense
counsel
made
objection
given
decisions
point
jurisdiction
four
years
respondent
trial
appeals
fifth
circuit
held
inherently
unfair
try
defendant
crime
garbed
jail
uniform
brooks
texas
similarly
texas
criminal
appeals
held
effort
made
avoid
trying
accused
jail
garb
ring
state
prior
texas
cases
made
clear
objection
interposed
see
wilkinson
state
tex
crim
app
ring
state
supra
nothing
record
therefore
warrants
conclusion
respondent
compelled
stand
trial
jail
garb
sufficient
reason
excuse
failure
raise
issue
trial
trial
judge
faulted
asking
respondent
counsel
whether
deliberately
going
trial
jail
clothes
impose
requirement
suggests
trial
judge
operates
burden
situation
johnson
zerbst
issue
concerned
whether
accused
willingly
stood
trial
without
benefit
counsel
adversary
system
defendant
assistance
counsel
vast
array
trial
decisions
strategic
tactical
must
made
trial
rests
accused
attorney
approach
rewrite
duties
trial
judges
counsel
legal
system
accordingly
although
state
consistently
fourteenth
amendment
compel
accused
stand
trial
jury
dressed
identifiable
prison
clothes
failure
make
objection
tried
clothes
whatever
reason
sufficient
negate
presence
compulsion
necessary
establish
constitutional
violation
judgment
appeals
therefore
reversed
cause
remanded
proceedings
consistent
opinion
reversed
remanded
footnotes
contumacious
defendant
brings
plight
upon
presents
limited
range
alternatives
obviously
defendant
allowed
abort
trial
frustrate
process
justice
acts
confronted
alleged
relinquishment
fundamental
right
sort
issue
johnson
zerbst
understandably
found
difficult
conceive
accused
making
knowing
decision
forgo
fundamental
right
assistance
counsel
absent
showing
conscious
surrender
known
right
however
engaged
exacting
analysis
respect
strategic
tactical
decisions
even
constitutional
implications
counseled
accused
see
lee
cf
fed
rule
crim
proc
second
circuit
noted
different
context
federal
courts
including
declined
notice
alleged
errors
objected
even
though
errors
involve
criminal
defendant
constitutional
rights
indiviglio
cert
denied
significantly
henderson
case
fifth
circuit
interpreted
hernandez
requiring
accused
take
affirmative
steps
apprise
trial
desire
tried
civilian
clothes
hernandez
simply
found
circumstances
presented
defendant
met
burden
interpretation
particularly
meaningful
since
author
hernandez
opinion
member
panel
subsequent
decision
henderson
moreover
hernandez
indicated
paint
broad
brush
types
cases
case
must
considered
factual
context
evidence
showed
respondent
caucasian
sixties
evidentiary
hearing
testified
felt
real
case
present
trial
testimony
several
eyewitnesses
clear
consistent
circumstances
desire
elicit
jury
sympathy
reasonable
approach
one
trial
judge
might
reasonably
assumed
deliberately
undertaken
based
state
judge
affidavit
stated
part
never
compelled
defendant
go
trial
jail
clothes
every
occasion
defendant
attorney
requested
allowed
wear
civilian
clothes
trial
granted
request
counsel
testified
prior
occasion
different
state
judge
overruled
objection
trial
client
jail
clothes
also
testified
seen
defendants
dressed
jail
garments
courtroom
respondent
tried
texas
courts
admittedly
established
rigid
rule
invalidating
practice
per
se
instead
courts
ordinarily
looked
whether
actual
injury
prejudice
resulted
defendant
appearance
jail
garb
garcia
state
tex
crim
app
xanthull
state
tex
crim
app
cases
provided
ample
grounds
objection
procedure
since
least
implicitly
recognized
reversible
error
result
practice
similarly
decision
xanthull
beto
supp
sd
tex
render
fruitless
objection
respondent
part
instead
case
like
various
state
cases
simply
imposed
burden
federal
habeas
petitioners
show
actual
prejudice
resulting
jury
trial
jail
garments
necessary
indeed
possible
us
decide
whether
defense
tactic
simply
indifference
either
case
respondent
silence
precludes
suggestion
compulsion
petitioner
contended
brief
oral
argument
appeals
decision
hernandez
applied
retroactively
petition
certiorari
raise
issue
disposition
case
renders
unnecessary
decide
justice
powell
justice
stewart
joins
concurring
concur
opinion
opinion
dissenting
opinion
take
divergent
views
case
write
separately
identify
specifically
considerations
deem
controlling
respondent
harry
lee
williams
tried
clad
prison
issue
despite
differences
relevance
compulsion
case
opinion
dissenting
opinion
essentially
agree
defendant
constitutional
right
tried
disagreement
significance
attributed
williams
failure
object
trial
relevant
case
two
situations
conviction
left
standing
despite
claimed
infringement
constitutional
right
first
situation
arises
shown
substantive
right
question
consensually
relinquished
situation
arises
defendant
made
inexcusable
procedural
default
failing
object
time
substantive
right
protected
hart
foreword
time
chart
justices
harv
rev
see
american
bar
association
project
standards
criminal
justice
remedies
app
draft
williams
represented
retained
experienced
counsel
conceded
counsel
fully
aware
prison
garb
issue
elected
raise
objection
simply
thought
objection
futile
record
also
shows
state
judge
presided
williams
trial
practice
allowing
defendants
stand
trial
civilian
clothing
requested
supp
thus
apparent
objection
interposed
williams
trial
prison
garb
issue
presented
arisen
case
thus
presents
situation
occurs
frequently
criminal
trial
namely
defendant
failing
object
incident
trial
implicates
constitutional
right
often
case
situations
timely
objection
allowed
cure
also
frequently
case
rights
involved
counsel
failure
object
susceptible
interpretation
tactical
choice
ante
view
tactical
choice
procedural
default
nature
involved
ordinarily
operate
matter
federal
law
preclude
later
raising
substantive
right
generally
disfavor
inferred
waivers
constitutional
rights
see
johnson
zerbst
barker
wingo
policy
however
need
carried
length
allowing
counsel
defendant
deliberately
forgo
objection
curable
trial
defect
even
though
aware
factual
legal
basis
objection
simply
thought
objection
futile
williams
counsel
claim
indeed
claimed
new
issue
involved
appeals
fifth
circuit
texas
courts
recognized
trial
prison
garb
constitutional
error
impingement
upon
presumption
innocence
ante
even
confronted
procedural
default
discretion
might
sometimes
exercised
overturn
conviction
familiar
principles
plain
error
see
indiviglio
previous
cases
make
clear
bar
raised
untimely
presentation
constitutional
claims
see
fay
noia
henry
mississippi
right
involved
right
consequence
attorney
conduct
may
bind
client
see
henry
mississippi
supra
cf
brookhart
janis
entitlement
courts
ordinarily
rely
counsel
advise
defendant
make
timely
assertion
rights
even
validity
guilty
plea
issue
factor
mcmann
richardson
justice
brennan
justice
marshall
concurs
dissenting
dissent
statement
defendant
clothing
likely
continuing
influence
throughout
trial
unacceptable
risk
presented
impermissible
factors
affecting
jurors
judgment
thus
presenting
possibility
unjustified
verdict
guilt
ante
concedes
respondent
trial
identifiable
prison
garb
constituted
denial
due
process
law
judgment
setting
aside
respondent
conviction
nevertheless
reversed
ground
respondent
compelled
state
wear
prison
garb
record
plainly
rest
reversal
finding
respondent
knowingly
voluntarily
intelligently
consented
tried
attire
thus
waived
due
process
right
johnson
zerbst
rather
first
time
confines
due
process
protections
defining
right
materially
affects
fairness
accuracy
process
terms
state
compulsion
concept
although
relevant
context
fifth
amendment
privilege
simply
inapposite
constitutional
analysis
concerning
due
process
criminal
proceedings
end
result
definitional
approach
impute
effect
waiver
failure
respondent
counsel
apprise
trial
judge
respondent
objection
tried
prison
garb
results
illogical
delineation
particular
right
involved
case
also
introduces
jurisprudence
novel
dangerously
unfair
test
surrender
basic
constitutional
rights
agree
concedes
respondent
denied
due
process
law
due
process
violation
state
denies
accused
objection
tried
garb
ante
developed
relevant
constitutional
difference
concerning
due
process
right
accused
objected
practice
one
essential
due
process
safeguards
attends
accused
trial
benefit
presumption
innocence
bedrock
axiomatic
elementary
principle
whose
enforcement
lies
foundation
administration
criminal
law
winship
quoting
coffin
see
also
deutch
sinclair
presumption
innocence
given
concrete
substance
due
process
requirement
imposes
prosecution
burden
proving
guilt
accused
beyond
reasonable
doubt
accused
criminal
prosecution
stake
interests
immense
importance
possibility
may
lose
liberty
upon
conviction
certainty
stigmatized
conviction
accordingly
society
values
good
name
freedom
every
individual
condemn
man
commission
crime
reasonable
doubt
guilt
winship
supra
prime
instrument
reducing
risk
convictions
resting
factual
error
standard
accused
tried
identifiable
prison
garb
dangers
denial
fair
trial
possibility
verdict
based
evidence
obvious
identifiable
prison
garb
robs
accused
respect
dignity
accorded
participants
trial
constitutionally
due
accused
element
presumption
innocence
surely
tends
brand
eyes
jurors
unmistakable
mark
guilt
jurors
may
speculate
accused
pretrial
incarceration
although
often
result
inability
raise
bail
explained
fact
poses
danger
community
prior
criminal
record
significant
danger
thus
created
corruption
factfinding
process
mere
suspicion
prejudice
may
subtle
jurors
may
even
conscious
deadly
impact
system
every
person
presumed
innocent
proved
guilty
beyond
reasonable
doubt
due
process
clause
forbids
toleration
risk
jurors
required
presumption
innocence
accept
accused
peer
individual
like
innocent
proved
guilty
may
well
see
accused
garbed
prison
attire
obviously
guilty
person
recommitted
place
clothes
clearly
show
belongs
difficult
conceive
situation
fraught
risk
presumption
innocence
standard
reasonable
doubt
trial
identifiable
prison
garb
also
entails
additional
dangers
accuracy
objectiveness
factfinding
process
example
accused
considering
whether
testify
defense
must
weigh
decision
jurors
react
paraded
attire
surely
reasonable
concerned
whether
jurors
less
likely
credit
testimony
individual
whose
garb
brands
criminal
problem
likely
confront
indigent
accused
appears
prison
garb
poor
make
bail
circumstance
concession
prosecutorial
interest
served
trying
accused
prison
clothes
ante
ironical
ring
light
effect
trial
prison
garb
denying
accused
benefit
presumption
innocence
undercutting
standard
escapes
delineate
right
established
case
right
compelled
wear
prison
garb
holds
clothes
accused
unsuccessfully
objected
wearing
prison
garb
thus
compelled
wear
unconstitutionally
disadvantages
case
obviously
prison
clothes
nonobjecting
accused
similarly
unconstitutionally
disadvantageous
jury
perspective
situations
objecting
nonobjecting
defendants
every
respect
identical
clothes
accused
objected
create
improper
negative
inferences
minds
jurors
must
clothes
nonobjecting
accused
nothing
logic
experience
suggests
jurors
need
knowledge
objection
lodged
react
differently
two
situations
baffles
conceded
trial
identifiable
prison
garb
denigrates
accused
presumption
innocence
make
constitutional
determination
turn
whether
accused
informed
trial
objected
since
objection
irrelevant
purpose
underlying
prohibition
trial
prison
garb
delineation
due
process
right
case
confining
due
process
safeguard
situations
state
compulsion
irrational
face
sure
accused
may
knowingly
voluntarily
intelligently
consent
tried
prison
garb
johnson
zerbst
without
reason
departing
standard
simply
subverted
promulgating
novel
dangerous
doctrine
basic
due
process
safeguard
affecting
fairness
accuracy
factfinding
procedure
contingent
right
even
come
existence
affirmatively
asserted
today
thus
signaling
demise
johnson
zerbst
voluntary
waiver
test
standard
determination
surrender
constitutional
protections
certainly
failure
object
trial
prison
garb
even
accused
shown
know
might
object
surrenders
basic
constitutional
right
securing
fairness
accuracy
factfinding
process
totally
eviscerated
traditional
doctrine
loss
rights
presumed
inaction
ii
justices
powell
stewart
concur
evisceration
fundamental
due
process
rights
basis
rationale
essentially
different
rationale
opinion
circumstance
joining
opinion
puzzling
although
opinion
admittedly
obscure
may
interpreted
either
importing
concept
compulsion
areas
inapposite
diluting
standard
waiver
fundamental
constitutional
rights
concurring
opinion
prefer
reverse
appeals
ground
respondent
properly
respondent
attorney
committed
inexcusable
procedural
default
tactical
choice
precludes
present
assertion
substantive
right
ante
concurring
opinion
obfuscates
various
issues
import
statement
true
rationale
concurring
opinion
brought
better
focus
today
opinion
francis
henderson
post
properly
present
question
procedural
default
essential
delineate
two
separate
concepts
relating
methods
criminal
defendants
may
yield
lose
constitutional
rights
one
concept
waiver
least
respect
constitutional
rights
affecting
fairness
accuracy
factfinding
process
means
accused
engaged
conduct
may
characterized
intentional
relinquishment
abandonment
known
right
privilege
johnson
zerbst
see
supra
accused
knowingly
waived
rights
otherwise
entitled
merits
claim
unconstitutionally
deprived
anything
separate
concept
procedural
default
involves
manner
accused
may
forfeit
rights
asserting
according
strictures
state
procedural
rules
accused
committed
procedural
default
may
never
adjudication
underlying
constitutional
claim
merits
problem
addressed
fay
noia
held
federal
habeas
judge
may
discretion
deny
relief
applicant
deliberately
orderly
procedure
state
courts
forfeited
state
remedies
however
fay
emphatic
clear
grant
discretion
interpreted
permission
introduce
legal
fictions
federal
habeas
corpus
unambiguously
explained
deliberate
test
procedural
defaults
analogue
knowing
intelligent
waiver
standard
loss
constitutional
rights
absence
procedural
rule
concerning
assertion
classic
definition
waiver
enunciated
johnson
zerbst
intentional
relinquishment
abandonment
known
right
privilege
furnishes
controlling
standard
habeas
applicant
consultation
competent
counsel
otherwise
understandingly
knowingly
forewent
privilege
seeking
vindicate
federal
claims
state
courts
whether
strategic
tactical
reasons
fairly
described
deliberate
state
procedures
open
federal
habeas
deny
relief
state
courts
refused
entertain
federal
claims
merits
though
course
federal
satisfied
holding
hearing
means
facts
bearing
upon
applicant
default
events
wish
clearly
understood
standard
put
forth
depends
considered
choice
petitioner
choice
made
counsel
participated
petitioner
automatically
bar
relief
state
finding
waiver
bar
independent
determination
question
federal
courts
habeas
waiver
affecting
federal
rights
federal
question
ibid
background
mind
two
glaring
inadequacies
concurring
opinion
become
manifest
first
issue
procedural
default
state
law
presented
case
texas
criminal
appeals
render
decision
state
procedural
grounds
view
federal
waiver
doctrine
expounded
another
appeals
fifth
circuit
opinion
see
williams
state
issue
procedural
default
never
raised
state
addressed
simply
indefensible
seize
ground
purported
justification
perpetuate
respondent
unconstitutional
confinement
see
also
infra
second
even
basic
concurring
opinion
without
reference
holding
fay
without
citing
precedent
reverse
appeals
standard
directly
repudiates
fay
implicitly
undermines
precedential
value
respect
assertion
habeas
proceedings
constitutional
rights
concurring
opinion
converts
deliberate
test
fay
inexcusable
default
test
find
inexcusable
procedural
default
mere
failure
object
unconstitutional
practice
reasoning
timely
objection
unconstitutional
action
remedied
logic
hindsight
matter
probably
invoked
time
counsel
inadvertently
inexplicably
fails
object
contemporaneously
deprivation
client
fundamental
rights
fay
test
thus
rendered
hollow
shell
indeed
concurring
opinion
also
appear
shift
fay
burden
proof
case
unconstitutional
deprivation
accused
rights
shown
requiring
accused
show
default
inexcusable
rather
requiring
state
show
default
deliberate
moreover
fay
required
decision
assert
constitutional
rights
informed
choice
accused
rather
counsel
concurring
opinion
alter
aspect
fay
rights
involved
concurring
opinion
provides
principled
content
however
term
right
defendant
presumption
innocence
impinged
state
hales
accused
clad
prison
garb
judge
supposedly
charged
ensuring
fairness
trial
right
right
jury
trial
requirement
state
prove
every
element
crime
proof
beyond
reasonable
doubt
right
counsel
concurring
opinion
apparently
undermine
settled
doctrines
concerning
waiver
loss
rights
without
ever
addressing
departure
methodology
unswerving
path
charted
precedents
actions
counsel
bind
accused
situations
seem
obligation
elucidate
standards
counsel
actions
judged
particularly
case
ineffective
assistance
counsel
alleged
see
nn
infra
event
concurring
opinion
means
brothers
stewart
powell
forsaking
teaching
precedents
fay
respectfully
suggest
clear
responsibility
indirection
explicate
least
contours
outer
limits
novel
dangerous
doctrines
formulating
see
generally
francis
henderson
post
brennan
dissenting
simply
unacceptable
brethren
concede
respondent
convicted
derogation
constitutionally
secured
presumption
innocence
nevertheless
sanction
unconstitutional
confinement
basis
procedural
default
principles
neither
articulated
justified
case
calling
analysis
see
francis
henderson
conjured
ground
decision
case
unarticulated
principles
even
legitimately
implicated
hardly
passes
reasoned
adjudication
grave
disservice
litigants
must
come
iii
even
standard
compelled
appearance
judgment
appeals
affirmed
holding
relies
per
curiam
statement
appeals
fifth
circuit
petition
rehearing
hernandez
beto
cert
denied
defendant
may
willingly
proceed
trial
prison
garb
later
protest
fact
ante
yet
applying
standard
hernandez
see
supp
district
case
expressly
found
respondent
willingly
gone
trial
identifiable
prison
garb
finding
affirmed
appeals
significantly
district
stated
emphasis
supplied
clear
record
case
consistent
evidence
adduced
dennison
companion
case
prior
hernandez
exist
common
practice
harris
county
courts
try
incarcerated
defendants
jail
clothing
unless
able
secure
dispensation
doubt
judge
practice
allowing
defendants
stand
trial
civilian
clothing
requested
practice
evidently
followed
certain
judges
well
however
record
reveal
judge
practice
publicly
known
known
defendants
counsel
reasonably
times
material
respondent
criminal
trial
standard
practice
defendants
custody
dressed
alike
without
policy
employed
judge
uniformly
adopted
even
majority
criminal
district
judges
harris
county
instead
evidence
points
strong
likelihood
trial
climate
time
acted
natural
deterrent
raising
objections
commonplace
trial
jail
clothes
even
assuming
defendants
counsel
thought
problem
considered
legal
implications
absence
consideration
scarcely
concluded
either
respondent
trial
counsel
knowingly
willingly
voluntarily
waived
right
tried
civilian
clothing
indeed
even
sub
silentio
factual
findings
concurred
two
courts
supported
record
defense
counsel
nothing
fear
objection
ante
yet
district
found
prevalent
trial
climate
deterred
making
objections
omits
mention
significant
finding
district
practice
followed
respondent
case
customary
jurisdiction
also
omits
mention
fact
uncontradicted
evidence
respondent
counsel
failed
object
objection
perceived
futile
counsel
purpose
elicit
jury
sympathy
otherwise
acquiesce
practice
purposes
trial
tactics
crucial
defense
counsel
conscious
problem
trial
jail
garb
since
mentioned
point
voir
dire
judge
thus
informed
counsel
knowledge
ante
impliedly
suggests
trial
judge
reason
relieved
obligation
affirmatively
inquire
whether
respondent
actually
desired
tried
garb
trial
judge
might
conclude
respondent
engaging
deliberate
trial
tactic
elicit
jury
sympathy
record
wholly
devoid
basis
analysis
jury
attention
respondent
jail
garb
first
directed
prosecution
voir
dire
indeed
done
highlight
prevalence
practice
harris
county
courts
trial
judge
truly
sensitive
problem
willing
suggested
sustain
objection
raised
practice
curious
comments
provoked
reaction
suggests
mattered
case
respondent
strong
respondent
real
case
testimony
eyewitnesses
clear
consistent
ante
even
true
share
view
strength
trial
evidence
relieve
trial
judge
duty
inquire
whether
respondent
satisfied
proceed
trial
prison
garb
particularly
since
judge
knowledge
time
respondent
real
case
indeed
judge
uncommunicated
good
intentions
alleged
sensitivity
prison
garb
highly
questionable
light
respondent
evidence
six
cases
involving
nonbailed
defendants
tried
judge
courtroom
two
months
surrounding
respondent
case
every
accused
appeared
prison
garb
reasonableness
respondent
perception
trial
objection
futile
accentuated
fact
deputy
sheriff
already
denied
respondent
explicit
request
wear
trial
clothes
arrested
least
light
district
finding
knowing
voluntary
waiver
trial
objections
deterred
prevalent
trial
climate
think
remand
factual
development
concerning
practice
harris
county
time
respondent
trial
record
us
plainly
calls
affirmance
appeals
respondent
appeared
trial
wearing
white
harris
county
jail
stenciled
across
back
oversized
white
dungarees
harris
county
jail
stenciled
legs
shower
thongs
principal
witnesses
state
respondent
trial
referred
person
sitting
uniform
record
appeal
tex
crim
app
holding
compelled
wearing
prison
garb
constitutionally
proscribed
understandably
cites
precedent
startling
result
area
concept
compulsion
relevant
definition
substantive
right
fifth
amendment
privilege
see
garner
terms
clause
fifth
amendment
speaks
individual
compelled
witness
due
process
rights
fair
trial
however
depend
existence
state
compulsion
moreover
clear
even
fifth
amendment
context
state
compulsion
required
steps
taken
ensure
constitutional
rights
knowingly
voluntarily
waived
see
maness
meyers
see
also
nn
infra
reliance
illinois
allen
particularly
inexplicable
see
ante
allen
held
courts
must
indulge
every
reasonable
presumption
loss
constitutional
rights
johnson
zerbst
held
accused
deprived
right
present
trial
warned
judge
removed
continues
disruptive
behavior
nevertheless
insists
conducting
manner
disorderly
disruptive
disrespectful
trial
carried
courtroom
lost
right
present
course
reclaimed
soon
defendant
willing
conduct
consistently
decorum
respect
inherent
concept
courts
judicial
proceedings
allen
thus
requires
knowing
voluntary
intelligent
waiver
constitutional
right
present
trial
standard
view
also
applies
trial
prison
garb
suggests
accused
persons
freely
choose
wear
prison
garb
ante
mentions
case
person
free
bail
thus
truly
able
make
voluntary
choice
respect
wear
trial
asked
wear
prison
garb
trial
cases
show
uncommon
defense
tactic
produce
defendant
jail
clothes
hope
eliciting
sympathy
jury
ante
insofar
suggests
practice
prevalent
confident
simply
empirical
data
support
statement
event
prevalence
practice
explain
limitation
acknowledged
infirmity
cases
compelled
appearance
prison
clothes
single
reported
case
garcia
beto
defense
attorney
testified
given
particular
circumstances
case
sought
portray
client
drunk
thought
emphasizing
difference
accused
jurors
aided
making
defense
fifth
circuit
found
deliberate
trial
strategy
constituted
waiver
right
tried
civilian
clothes
although
cases
cited
today
noted
garcia
opinion
none
involved
trial
tactic
see
watt
page
noting
cases
refer
possibility
may
trial
strategy
remanding
evidentiary
hearing
matter
anderson
watt
affirming
grant
habeas
relief
since
trial
strategy
shown
barber
state
tex
crim
app
asserting
fifth
circuit
garcia
noted
defendant
often
wants
tried
jail
clothing
common
defense
counsel
prove
jury
long
accused
confined
jail
however
demonstration
made
true
barber
case
case
garcia
garcia
case
never
suggested
practice
common
single
instance
defense
attorney
confronted
fact
client
tried
prison
garb
attempted
employ
fact
invoke
jury
sympathy
thereby
waived
right
otherwise
trial
civilian
garb
hardly
supports
conclusion
defendants
frequently
hope
benefit
tactic
ante
concurring
opinion
similarly
myopic
statement
counsel
failure
object
susceptible
interpretation
tactical
choice
ante
see
also
supra
event
even
situations
trial
prison
garb
deliberately
employed
defense
tactic
justify
decision
individuals
waived
rights
barker
wingo
indeed
although
acknowledging
trial
prison
garb
destroys
presumption
innocence
proclaims
confronted
alleged
relinquishment
fundamental
right
sort
issue
johnson
zerbst
ante
difficult
see
assertions
flatly
inconsistent
precedents
see
infra
cease
example
since
accused
right
criminal
trials
see
faretta
california
say
unless
indigent
accused
compelled
forgo
appointed
counsel
simply
exercising
right
represent
even
unaware
right
counsel
cf
powell
alabama
johnson
zerbst
gideon
wainwright
argersinger
hamlin
signaled
unless
accused
makes
state
rejects
motion
speedy
trial
automatically
constitutional
violation
barker
wingo
supra
perhaps
hold
constitutional
violation
accused
object
jury
instructions
otherwise
deny
due
process
right
convicted
state
proves
every
element
offense
beyond
reasonable
doubt
since
state
compulsion
mullaney
wilbur
see
also
camp
arkansas
possibilities
legion
often
recognized
constitutional
rights
even
though
accused
explicitly
demand
trial
thus
whether
decision
read
importing
privilege
compulsion
notion
areas
properly
applicability
abrogating
traditional
waiver
standard
rights
affecting
fairness
accuracy
factfinding
process
marked
indefensible
departure
constitutional
principles
long
settled
moreover
notions
may
pervasive
impact
habeas
corpus
proceedings
eventually
employ
principles
overrule
deliberate
test
fay
noia
holding
adequate
state
procedural
ground
precludes
review
appeal
mean
accused
pursue
vindication
federal
claim
federal
habeas
corpus
proceeding
procedural
default
alone
preclude
consideration
claim
henry
mississippi
concurring
opinion
put
gloss
opinion
opinion
today
francis
henderson
post
confirms
fears
groundless
certainly
basic
tenet
jurisprudence
consistently
constitutional
rights
affecting
fairness
accuracy
factfinding
process
lost
unless
state
demonstrates
intentional
relinquishment
abandonment
known
right
privilege
johnson
zerbst
supra
barker
wingo
supra
see
generally
schneckloth
bustamonte
brennan
dissenting
marshall
dissenting
defining
due
process
right
cases
terms
state
compulsion
opens
door
complete
abandonment
waiver
doctrine
phrase
rights
might
conceivably
value
reference
potential
constitutional
challenges
example
confrontation
clause
challenges
introduction
hearsay
evidence
arise
spontaneously
course
trial
concerning
may
inadequate
opportunity
counsel
consult
client
concurrence
however
invokes
rights
almost
talismanically
indication
term
connotes
rights
held
violated
unless
accused
knowingly
intelligently
waived
burden
proof
demonstrating
waiver
may
presumed
silent
record
rests
state
surely
adulterate
standards
context
procedural
defaults
see
francis
henderson
post
brennan
dissenting
indeed
test
fay
applied
standard
measuring
procedural
defaults
situations
affecting
fundamental
rights
failure
take
timely
appeal
failure
challenge
timely
manner
introduction
unconstitutionally
seized
evidence
failure
object
prosecutor
closing
comments
defendant
failure
testify
trial
see
fay
kaufman
camp
arkansas
hernandez
formal
objection
made
trial
judge
although
fifth
circuit
petition
rehearing
stated
defendant
may
remain
silent
willingly
go
trial
prison
garb
thereafter
claim
error
clear
addressing
question
traditional
waiver
perspective
continued
ibid
case
hernandez
counsel
object
jail
clothing
past
experience
thought
motion
change
attire
frivolous
motion
accept
voluntary
waiver
hernandez
present
case
factual
situation
found
district
virtually
identical
found
hernandez
distinguish
hernandez
however
ground
nothing
record
case
suggest
state
trial
judge
longstanding
practice
known
members
bar
permit
defendant
change
civilian
clothes
request
ante
addition
failing
take
account
suspect
nature
trial
judge
affidavit
see
infra
statement
ignores
district
finding
indication
purported
practice
publicly
known
known
respondent
counsel
see
infra
rule
practice
reverse
findings
fact
concurred
two
lower
courts
unless
shown
clearly
erroneous
see
blau
lehman
faulkner
gibbs
dickinson
commercial
credit
chemical
foundation
baker
schofield
towson
moore
cf
boulden
holman
neil
biggers
brennan
concurring
part
dissenting
part
implies
appeals
made
findings
failed
take
account
relevant
evidence
district
ante
district
presented
data
cited
nevertheless
concluded
trial
climate
objections
trial
prison
garb
deterred
number
cases
involving
issue
particularly
substantial
number
emanating
harris
county
courts
merely
reinforced
finding
moreover
reason
case
reassess
finding
two
courts
respondent
willingly
proceed
trial
prison
garb
petitioner
challenge
holding
petition
writ
certiorari
sought
resolution
basic
question
whether
trial
prison
garb
inherently
prejudicial
destroys
presumption
innocence
see
app
tr
concession
petitioner
habeas
evidentiary
hearing
trial
tactics
involved
case
prosecutor
addressing
remarks
specific
member
jury
panel
stated
defendant
sitting
jail
clothes
assuming
jail
time
trial
take
consideration
fact
man
jail
clothes
make
feel
guilty
street
clothes
second
thing
oftentimes
evidence
come
person
jail
seven
months
eight
months
awaiting
trial
token
taken
consideration
verdict
supposed
go
straight
line
guilty
guilty
let
person
dressed
influence
decision
exhibits
pp
heard
questions
asked
gone
reasonable
doubt
gone
business
defendant
dressed
fact
may
may
jail
time
trial
jury
federal
judge
mere
moderator
governor
trial
purpose
assuring
proper
conduct
determining
questions
law
herron
southern
pacific
upon
trial
judge
rests
duty
seeing
trial
conducted
solicitude
essential
rights
accused
glasser
truth
fairness
sacrificed
judge
must
exert
substantial
control
proceedings
geders
ante
law
relating
trial
prison
garb
clear
see
ante
concurring
opinion
ante
devastating
impact
garb
presumption
innocence
pervasive
trial
judge
sensitivity
genuine
invocation
adversary
system
see
ante
concurring
opinion
ante
justify
trial
judge
failure
inquire
matter
certainly
escape
attention
right
counsel
guaranteed
constitution
serve
purpose
defendants
left
mercies
incompetent
counsel
judges
strive
maintain
proper
standards
performance
attorneys
representing
defendants
criminal
cases
courts
mcmann
richardson
see
francis
henderson
post
brennan
dissenting
see
williams
exhibits
cases
involving
nonbailed
defendants
constituted
jury
cases
trial
judge
period
see
williams
exhibit
respondent
trial
counsel
aware
defendants
appearing
trial
judge
prison
garb
app
remand
factual
development
particularly
appropriate
believes
delineated
due
process
contours
trial
prison
garb
differently
district
since
district
might
analyzed
factors
relevant
state
compulsion
example
respondent
objected
introduction
trial
judge
affidavit
ground
taken
pursuant
federal
rules
civil
procedure
thus
afforded
respondent
counsel
opportunity
judge
inquire
matters
number
times
objections
actually
made
practice
trial
prison
garb
especially
hernandez
decision
brought
elimination
practice
harris
county
courts
fact
seems
delineated
right
differently
lower
courts
highlighted
fact
petition
asked
whether
defendant
trial
jail
clothing
destroys
presumption
innocence
deny
fair
trial
pet
cert
question
presented
whether
accused
compelled
wear
identifiable
prison
clothing
trial
jury
denied
due
process
equal
protection
laws
ante
emphasis
supplied
moreover
particularly
incongruous
actually
premising
holding
concurring
opinion
suggests
procedural
default
ground
never
presented
explored
reversing
merits
issue
rather
remanding
inquiry
whether
alleged
procedural
default
forecloses
inquiry
merits
respondent
claims
see
supra
appeals
address
respondent
contention
respondent
denied
effective
assistance
counsel
light
holding
respect
respondent
contention
appeals
addresses
issue
remand
course
light
fact
today
declares
ample
grounds
objection
trial
prison
garb
see
ante
concurring
opinion
ante
fact
trial
counsel
concededly
tactical
reason
desiring
respondent
tried
prison
garb
see
supra