leary
argued
decided
may
petitioner
accompanied
daughter
son
two
others
automobile
trip
new
york
mexico
apparent
denial
entry
mexico
drove
back
across
international
bridge
texas
customs
officer
search
discovered
marihuana
car
petitioner
daughter
person
petitioner
indicted
subsection
marihuana
tax
act
petitioner
trial
resulted
conviction
petitioner
admitted
acquiring
marihuana
new
york
said
know
grown
driving
laredo
texas
thence
mexican
customs
station
back
marihuana
tax
act
levies
occupational
tax
upon
deal
drug
provides
taxpayer
must
register
name
place
business
internal
revenue
service
act
imposes
transfer
tax
upon
transfers
marihuana
required
effected
written
order
form
except
limited
number
clearly
lawful
transfers
must
effected
form
act
imposes
transfer
tax
per
ounce
registered
transferee
per
ounce
unregistered
transferee
forms
executed
transferee
must
show
transferor
name
address
amount
marihuana
involved
copy
form
preserved
internal
revenue
service
information
contained
form
made
available
law
enforcement
officials
possession
marihuana
crime
texas
petitioner
arrested
new
york
petitioner
asserted
transfer
occurred
section
prohibits
transportation
concealment
marihuana
one
acquired
without
paid
transfer
tax
petitioner
conceded
done
petitioner
claimed
motion
new
trial
conviction
marihuana
tax
act
violated
privilege
argues
subsequent
decisions
marchetti
grosso
haynes
require
reversal
government
contends
act
transfer
tax
provisions
compel
incriminatory
disclosures
administratively
construed
applied
permit
prepayment
tax
persons
whose
activities
otherwise
lawful
title
makes
crime
transport
facilitate
transportation
illegally
imported
marihuana
knowledge
illegal
importation
provides
defendant
possession
marihuana
shall
deemed
sufficient
evidence
marihuana
illegally
imported
brought
unites
defendant
knew
illegal
importation
bringing
unless
defendant
explains
possession
satisfaction
jury
trial
instructed
jury
might
find
petitioner
guilty
violating
solely
petitioner
testimony
marihuana
brought
back
mexico
knowledge
fact
petitioner
continued
transport
partly
upon
testimony
transported
marihuana
new
york
texas
partly
upon
presumption
petitioner
contends
application
presumption
denied
due
process
law
held
petitioner
invocation
privilege
fifth
amendment
provided
full
defense
charge
pp
since
effect
act
terms
legal
possessors
marihuana
virtually
certain
registrants
exempt
order
form
requirement
compliance
transfer
tax
provisions
required
petitioner
one
registered
obliged
obtain
order
form
unmistakably
identify
member
selective
group
inherently
suspect
criminal
activities
thus
provisions
created
real
appreciable
hazard
incrimination
within
meaning
marchetti
grosso
haynes
pp
clear
language
act
legislative
history
contrary
interpretation
government
give
transfer
provisions
congress
intended
nonregistrant
able
obtain
order
form
prepay
transfer
tax
pp
since
act
clearly
aimed
bringing
light
violations
marihuana
laws
impose
restrictions
upon
use
information
revealed
transfer
provisions
order
avoid
constitutional
issue
pp
petitioner
claim
privilege
timely
circumstances
case
failure
assert
privilege
trial
antedated
decisions
marchetti
grosso
haynes
constitute
waiver
pp
taking
stand
petitioner
waived
right
remain
silent
trial
appeals
erroneously
held
right
plead
act
violated
privilege
latter
right
waived
testifying
noncompliance
act
religious
motivation
since
parts
testimony
indicated
also
influenced
apprehension
trying
pay
tax
might
incriminate
pp
circumstances
case
application
part
presumption
provides
possessor
marihuana
deemed
know
unlawful
importation
denied
petitioner
due
process
law
violation
fifth
amendment
pp
jury
trial
instructions
might
convicted
petitioner
aid
presumption
petitioner
foreclosed
challenging
constitutionality
presumption
jury
might
based
verdict
alternative
theory
instructions
rest
upon
presumption
case
submitted
jury
alternative
theories
unconstitutionality
theories
requires
conviction
set
aside
see
stromberg
california
pp
criminal
statutory
presumption
must
regarded
irrational
arbitrary
hence
unconstitutional
unless
said
substantial
assurance
presumed
fact
likely
flow
proved
fact
made
depend
tot
pp
even
assumed
great
preponderance
marihuana
used
smuggled
mexico
inference
illegal
importation
therefore
justified
tot
test
follow
since
significant
amount
may
imported
majority
marihuana
possessors
know
marihuana
illegally
imported
inference
knowledge
therefore
impermissible
unless
appears
basis
available
materials
possessors
aware
either
high
rate
importation
marihuana
grown
abroad
pp
possessor
marihuana
might
know
marihuana
came
abroad
one
five
ways
might
aware
proportion
domestically
consumed
marihuana
smuggled
abroad
deduce
illegally
imported
might
smuggled
might
learned
indirectly
marihuana
supplied
locality
came
abroad
might
specified
foreign
marihuana
making
purchase
might
able
tell
source
marihuana
appearance
packaging
taste
neither
legislative
record
sources
establish
substantial
assurance
even
majority
marihuana
possessors
learned
source
marihuana
one
ways
pp
robert
haft
argued
cause
filed
briefs
petitioner
john
martin
argued
cause
brief
solicitor
general
griswold
assistant
attorney
general
vinson
beatrice
rosenberg
briefs
amici
curiae
urging
reversal
filed
jonathan
sobeloff
melvin
wulf
american
civil
liberties
union
joseph
oteri
national
student
assn
justice
harlan
delivered
opinion
case
presents
constitutional
questions
arising
conviction
petitioner
timothy
leary
violation
two
federal
statutes
governing
traffic
marihuana
circumstances
surrounding
petitioner
conviction
follows
december
petitioner
left
new
york
automobile
intending
vacation
trip
yucatan
mexico
accompanied
daughter
son
teenagers
two
persons
december
party
drove
across
international
bridge
mexico
laredo
texas
stopped
mexican
customs
station
apparently
denied
entry
drove
back
across
bridge
halted
american
secondary
inspection
area
explained
situation
customs
inspector
stated
nothing
mexico
declare
inspector
asked
alight
examined
interior
car
saw
appeared
marihuana
seeds
floor
inspector
received
permission
search
car
passengers
small
amounts
marihuana
found
car
floor
glove
compartment
personal
search
petitioner
daughter
revealed
silver
snuff
box
containing
marihuana
three
partially
smoked
marihuana
cigarettes
petitioner
indicted
tried
jury
federal
district
southern
district
texas
three
counts
first
alleged
knowingly
smuggled
marihuana
violation
second
charged
knowingly
transported
facilitated
transportation
concealment
marihuana
illegally
imported
brought
knowledge
illegally
imported
brought
violation
third
alleged
petitioner
transferee
marihuana
knowingly
transported
concealed
facilitated
transportation
concealment
marihuana
without
paid
transfer
tax
imposed
marihuana
tax
act
et
thereby
violating
sides
presented
evidence
defense
moved
judgment
acquittal
district
dismissed
first
smuggling
count
jury
found
petitioner
guilty
two
counts
tentatively
sentenced
maximum
punishment
pending
completion
study
recommendations
used
district
fixing
final
sentence
appeal
appeals
fifth
circuit
affirmed
subsequently
denied
petition
rehearing
rehearing
en
banc
granted
certiorari
consider
two
questions
whether
petitioner
conviction
failing
comply
transfer
tax
provisions
marihuana
tax
act
violated
fifth
amendment
privilege
whether
petitioner
denied
due
process
application
part
provides
defendant
possession
marihuana
shall
deemed
sufficient
evidence
marihuana
illegally
imported
brought
defendant
knew
illegal
importation
bringing
unless
defendant
explains
possession
satisfaction
jury
reasons
follow
hold
favor
petitioner
issues
reverse
judgment
appeals
grosso
held
considerations
required
claim
privilege
defense
prosecution
imposes
excise
tax
proceeds
wagering
haynes
held
reasons
assertion
fifth
amendment
privilege
provided
defense
prosecution
possession
unregistered
weapon
national
firearms
act
despite
fact
uncommon
instances
registration
statute
incriminating
see
section
provides
persons
deal
marihuana
shall
subject
annual
occupational
tax
subsections
require
specified
categories
persons
importers
producers
physicians
researchers
millers
pay
varying
rates
tax
per
year
see
persons
deal
marihuana
fall
specified
categories
required
pay
per
year
see
section
provides
time
paying
tax
taxpayer
must
register
name
style
place
places
business
nearest
district
office
internal
revenue
service
first
transfer
tax
provisions
imposes
tax
upon
transfers
marihuana
required
section
carried
pursuance
written
order
forms
section
provides
transfers
persons
registered
tax
per
ounce
transfers
persons
registered
tax
per
ounce
tax
required
paid
transferee
time
securing
order
form
certain
exceptions
relevant
makes
unlawful
person
whether
required
pay
special
tax
register
sections
transfer
marihuana
except
pursuant
written
order
form
obtained
transferee
regulation
cfr
provides
order
form
must
show
name
address
transferor
transferee
registration
numbers
registered
quantity
marihuana
transferred
another
regulation
cfr
requires
transferee
submit
application
containing
data
order
obtain
form
section
act
requires
internal
revenue
service
preserve
records
duplicate
copy
order
form
issues
another
statutory
provision
assures
information
contained
order
form
available
law
enforcement
officials
section
provides
duplicate
order
forms
required
kept
internal
revenue
service
shall
open
inspection
treasury
personnel
state
local
officials
charged
enforcement
marihuana
laws
upon
payment
fee
officials
shall
furnished
copies
forms
finally
makes
unlawful
transferee
required
pay
transfer
tax
either
acquire
marihuana
without
paid
tax
transport
conceal
facilitate
transportation
concealment
marihuana
acquired
petitioner
convicted
conceded
trial
obtained
order
form
paid
transfer
tax
petitioner
ample
reason
fear
transmittal
official
fact
recent
unregistered
transferee
marihuana
surely
prove
significant
link
chain
evidence
tending
establish
guilt
state
marihuana
laws
effect
petitioner
failed
comply
act
late
possession
quantity
marihuana
apparently
crime
every
one
including
new
york
petitioner
claimed
transfer
occurred
texas
arrested
convicted
true
almost
including
new
york
texas
exceptions
making
lawful
specified
conditions
possession
marihuana
manufacturers
wholesalers
apothecaries
researchers
physicians
dentists
veterinarians
certain
medical
personnel
agents
employees
foregoing
persons
common
carriers
persons
drug
prescribed
given
authorized
medical
person
certain
public
officials
however
individuals
first
four
classes
among
compelled
register
pay
occupational
tax
consequence
registered
required
pay
per
ounce
transfer
tax
extremely
unlikely
persons
remain
unregistered
failure
register
renders
liable
additional
per
ounce
transfer
tax
also
severe
criminal
penalties
persons
last
three
classes
mentioned
appear
wholly
exempt
order
form
transfer
tax
requirements
thus
time
petitioner
failed
comply
act
persons
might
legally
possess
marihuana
state
law
virtually
certain
either
registered
exempt
order
form
requirement
follows
class
possessors
unregistered
obliged
obtain
order
form
constituted
selective
group
inherently
suspect
criminal
activities
since
compliance
transfer
tax
provisions
required
petitioner
unmistakably
identify
member
selective
suspect
group
decide
read
according
terms
provisions
created
real
appreciable
hazard
incrimination
government
asserts
regulations
clearly
signify
person
permitted
register
unless
activities
permissible
law
jurisdiction
one
permitted
obtain
order
form
prepay
transfer
tax
unless
registered
result
government
contends
simply
prohibit
nonregistrants
like
petitioner
dealing
marihuana
government
asserts
administrative
practice
internal
revenue
service
bureau
narcotics
always
consistent
interpretation
though
concedes
apparently
never
attempt
nonregistrant
prepay
tax
government
admit
uncertainty
whether
fact
attempt
communicated
law
enforcement
officials
however
points
nothing
statute
regulations
appears
compel
disclosure
government
argues
regulations
administrative
practice
effectively
refute
existence
substantial
hazard
incrimination
time
petitioner
acquired
marihuana
first
known
obtain
order
form
consequently
never
applied
second
substantial
risk
unsuccessful
application
brought
attention
law
enforcement
officials
accept
government
argument
find
congress
intend
nonregistrant
able
obtain
order
form
prepay
transfer
tax
congressional
intent
appears
language
act
legislative
history
begin
words
statute
section
read
conjunction
imposes
tax
upon
every
transfer
marihuana
exceptions
relevant
section
tax
registrants
shall
per
ounce
tax
transfers
nonregistrants
shall
per
ounce
section
uch
tax
shall
paid
transferee
time
securing
order
form
shall
addition
price
form
emphasis
added
since
makes
distinction
tax
transfers
registrants
tax
transfers
nonregistrants
seems
clear
congress
contemplated
nonregistrant
well
registrant
transferees
able
obtain
order
forms
prepay
tax
legislative
history
also
strongly
indicates
act
intended
merely
impose
high
tax
transfers
nonregistrants
prohibit
transfers
entirely
taxing
measure
bill
course
originated
house
representatives
start
first
hearing
bill
house
ways
means
committee
committee
chairman
announced
introduced
bill
request
secretary
treasury
transfer
provisions
bill
read
essentially
first
witness
appear
committee
treasury
department
assistant
general
counsel
clinton
hester
began
stating
bill
purpose
raise
revenue
marihuana
traffic
also
discourage
current
widespread
undesirable
use
marihuana
smokers
drug
addicts
stated
form
bill
synthesis
harrison
narcotics
act
et
national
firearms
act
et
seq
statutes
compelled
dealers
respective
goods
register
pay
special
tax
prohibited
transfer
except
pursuance
written
form
imposed
transfer
tax
however
transfer
provisions
differed
narcotics
act
provided
one
except
registrant
legally
obtain
order
form
see
firearms
act
merely
imposed
tax
upon
transfer
firearm
covered
act
treasury
witness
explained
marihuana
tax
bill
generally
followed
plan
narcotics
act
insofar
required
dealers
marihuana
register
prohibited
transfers
except
order
form
testified
constitutional
doubts
point
bill
like
national
firearms
act
departs
plan
harrison
narcotic
act
limits
right
purchase
narcotic
drugs
persons
permitted
register
act
order
obviate
possibility
attack
upon
constitutionality
bill
like
national
firearms
act
permits
transfer
marihuana
nonregistered
persons
upon
payment
heavy
transfer
tax
bill
permit
transfer
marihuana
anyone
impose
per
ounce
tax
upon
transfer
person
might
use
purposes
dangerous
harmful
public
house
senate
reports
describe
purposes
transfer
provisions
largely
language
hester
testimony
house
report
declares
purpose
discourage
widespread
use
drug
smokers
drug
addicts
render
extremely
difficult
acquisition
marihuana
persons
desire
illicit
uses
transfer
tax
prevent
drug
coming
hands
put
illicit
uses
discussing
issue
constitutionality
report
recites
law
settled
congress
power
enact
tax
heavy
discourage
transactions
activities
taxed
hese
cases
sustain
tax
imposed
upon
transfers
unregistered
persons
senate
report
without
discussing
constitutionality
otherwise
purpose
transfer
provisions
words
house
report
thus
committee
reports
confirm
hester
account
bill
purposes
short
legislative
history
fully
accords
statutory
language
upon
evidence
hesitation
concluding
interpretation
government
give
transfer
provisions
contrary
manifest
congressional
intent
transfers
nonregistrants
taxed
forbidden
insofar
regulations
require
comparison
signatures
necessarily
compel
result
urged
government
must
regarded
contrary
statute
hence
beyond
scope
authority
delegated
congress
true
regulations
promulgated
congress
entire
act
effect
however
scanty
legislative
history
accompanying
reenactment
gives
hint
congress
knew
particular
regulations
much
less
indirect
impact
government
ascribes
recently
noted
massachusetts
trustees
congressional
reenactment
statute
even
without
apparent
knowledge
particular
regulation
strengthen
extent
regulation
claim
validity
save
regulation
contradict
requirements
statute
regulation
conflicts
statute
fact
subsequent
immaterial
congress
add
expand
statute
impliedly
approving
regulation
commissioner
acker
persuaded
government
argument
construction
followed
internal
revenue
service
bureau
narcotics
ever
since
passage
act
interpretation
agencies
charged
administering
act
controlling
often
recognized
general
matter
contemporaneous
construction
statute
administering
agencies
entitled
great
weight
ftc
mandel
show
great
deference
udall
tallman
however
instance
government
admits
decisions
last
term
marchetti
grosso
haynes
alleged
interpretation
made
known
regulations
since
apparently
never
application
nonregistrant
prepay
transfer
tax
moreover
brief
sanchez
plainly
took
position
act
imposed
tax
prohibition
transfers
nonregistrants
implying
time
alleged
administrative
construction
unknown
even
charged
representing
circumstances
alleged
administrative
construction
furnish
additional
support
government
argument
foregoing
shows
time
petitioner
acquired
marihuana
confronted
statute
face
permitted
acquire
drug
legally
provided
paid
per
ounce
transfer
tax
gave
incriminating
information
simultaneously
system
regulations
according
government
prohibited
acquiring
marihuana
conditions
found
regulations
keeping
statute
ultra
vires
faced
conflicting
commands
think
petitioner
justified
giving
precedence
higher
authority
statute
iteral
full
compliance
statutory
requirements
entailed
substantial
risk
see
supra
urged
us
marchetti
grosso
haynes
avoid
constitutional
difficulty
placing
restrictions
upon
use
information
gained
transfer
provisions
declined
impose
use
restrictions
cases
found
furnishing
information
interested
prosecutors
significant
element
congress
purposes
adopting
statutes
involved
marchetti
supra
text
legislative
history
marihuana
tax
act
plainly
disclose
similar
congressional
purpose
noted
requires
copies
order
forms
kept
available
inspection
state
local
officials
copies
furnished
officials
request
house
senate
reports
state
one
objective
act
development
adequate
means
publicizing
dealings
marihuana
order
tax
control
traffic
effectively
short
think
conclusion
inescapable
statute
aimed
bringing
light
transgressions
marihuana
laws
hence
last
term
cases
decline
impose
use
restrictions
obliged
conclude
timely
proper
assertion
privilege
provided
complete
defense
prosecution
denying
leary
petition
rehearing
appeals
addition
holding
privilege
generally
inapplicable
prosecutions
found
petitioner
claim
privilege
improper
took
stand
affirmatively
waived
privilege
testifying
fully
details
acquisition
transportation
marihuana
without
paid
tax
relying
proposition
statement
marchetti
decision
case
provide
shield
taxpayer
outside
privilege
protection
think
appeals
misconceived
thrust
dictum
aspect
privilege
involved
marchetti
petitioner
asserts
undoubted
right
accused
remain
silent
trial
instead
right
criminally
liable
one
previous
failure
obey
statute
required
incriminatory
act
thus
petitioner
asserting
right
stand
mute
trial
convicted
failed
comply
transfer
provisions
act
time
acquired
marihuana
admission
trial
indeed
failed
comply
statute
perfectly
consistent
claim
omission
excused
privilege
hence
amount
waiver
claim
government
suggests
petitioner
waived
right
plead
yet
another
way
testifying
trial
violated
statute
reasons
entirely
unrelated
fear
true
portions
petitioner
testimony
indicate
noncompliance
motivated
least
part
conviction
act
imposed
illegal
tax
upon
religion
upon
pursuit
knowledge
belief
consequence
system
regulations
administrative
practice
described
permitted
pay
tax
however
parts
petitioner
testimony
clearly
indicate
also
influenced
apprehension
trying
pay
tax
might
incriminate
say
petitioner
testimony
taken
whole
amounted
waiver
privilege
conclude
petitioner
invocation
privilege
proper
provided
full
defense
third
count
indictment
accordingly
reverse
petitioner
conviction
ii
knowingly
intent
defraud
imports
brings
marihuana
contrary
law
receives
conceals
buys
sells
manner
facilitates
transportation
concealment
sale
marihuana
imported
brought
knowing
imported
brought
contrary
law
whenever
trial
violation
subsection
defendant
shown
marihuana
possession
possession
shall
deemed
sufficient
evidence
authorize
conviction
unless
defendant
explains
possession
satisfaction
jury
view
testimony
trial
instructed
jury
might
find
petitioner
guilty
violating
either
two
alternative
theories
first
theory
conviction
based
solely
upon
petitioner
testimony
marihuana
brought
back
mexico
knowledge
fact
petitioner
continued
transport
second
theory
conviction
depended
partly
upon
petitioner
testimony
transported
marihuana
new
york
texas
partly
upon
challenged
presumption
government
contends
giving
testimony
trial
established
elements
offense
theory
failing
object
jury
instructions
ground
advanced
petitioner
foreclosed
raising
point
thereafter
agree
even
assuming
petitioner
testimony
supply
evidence
required
valid
conviction
theory
jury
nevertheless
told
alternatively
convict
aid
presumption
theory
know
conviction
rest
ground
long
settled
case
submitted
jury
alternative
theories
unconstitutionality
theories
requires
conviction
set
aside
see
stromberg
california
true
petitioner
object
jury
instructions
basis
presumption
alleged
unconstitutionality
however
rely
upon
ground
previous
motion
directed
verdict
close
prosecution
case
urged
subsequent
motion
new
trial
motions
denied
appeals
considered
petitioner
constitutional
argument
merits
rejected
see
circumstances
conclude
question
properly
us
early
decisions
set
forth
number
different
standards
measure
validity
statutory
presumptions
however
tot
singled
one
tests
controlling
tot
rule
adhered
two
subsequent
cases
issue
presented
tot
federal
statute
construed
made
crime
one
previously
convicted
crime
violence
receive
firearm
ammunition
interstate
transaction
statute
provided
possession
firearm
ammunition
person
shall
presumptive
evidence
firearm
ammunition
shipped
transported
received
case
may
person
violation
act
relying
upon
prior
decision
civil
case
held
controlling
test
determining
validity
statutory
presumption
rational
connection
facts
proved
fact
presumed
stated
decisions
statutory
presumption
sustained
rational
connection
fact
proved
ultimate
fact
presumed
inference
one
proof
arbitrary
lack
connection
two
common
experience
say
valid
presumption
may
created
upon
view
relation
broader
jury
might
take
specific
case
inference
strained
reasonable
relation
circumstances
life
know
competent
legislature
create
rule
governing
procedure
courts
footnotes
omitted
applying
rational
connection
test
held
tot
presumption
unconstitutional
rejected
contention
forbade
intrastate
acquisition
firearms
without
record
transaction
registration
ownership
inferred
merely
possession
acquisition
meet
requirements
must
interstate
noting
alternative
possibilities
unlawful
intrastate
acquisition
interstate
shipment
prior
beginning
state
regulation
see
two
subsequent
cases
ruled
upon
constitutionality
criminal
statutory
presumptions
gainey
romano
involved
companion
sections
internal
revenue
code
dealing
illegal
stills
presumption
gainey
worded
similarly
one
issue
permitted
jury
infer
defendant
presence
illegal
still
carrying
business
distiller
unless
defendant
explains
presence
satisfaction
jury
see
held
gainey
presumption
tested
rational
connection
standard
announced
tot
added
process
making
determination
rationality
nature
highly
empirical
matters
within
specialized
judicial
competence
completely
commonplace
significant
weight
accorded
capacity
congress
amass
stuff
actual
experience
cull
conclusions
presumption
attack
romano
supra
identical
gainey
except
authorized
jury
infer
defendant
presence
illegal
still
possession
custody
control
still
see
held
presumption
invalid
stating
result
gainey
entirely
justified
resence
operating
still
sufficient
evidence
prove
charge
carrying
anyone
present
site
probably
connected
illegal
enterprise
concluded
presence
relevant
admissible
evidence
trial
possession
charge
absent
showing
defendant
function
still
connection
possession
tenuous
permit
reasonable
inference
guilt
inference
one
proof
arbitrary
tot
ibid
far
relevant
presumption
quoted
supra
authorizes
jury
infer
defendant
possession
marihuana
two
necessary
elements
crime
marihuana
imported
brought
illegally
defendant
knew
unlawful
importation
bringing
petitioner
argues
neither
inference
valid
citing
undisputed
testimony
trial
effect
marihuana
grow
anywhere
actually
grown
government
contends
hand
inferences
permissible
reasons
follow
hold
unconstitutional
part
presumption
relates
defendant
knowledge
illegal
importation
consequently
reach
question
validity
illegal
importation
inference
regard
knowledge
presumption
believe
tot
romano
require
take
statute
face
value
ask
whether
permits
conviction
upon
insufficient
proof
knowledge
rather
inquire
whether
congress
might
made
possession
crime
order
thus
determine
constitutionality
knowledge
inference
one
must
direct
circumstantial
data
regarding
beliefs
marihuana
users
generally
source
drug
consume
information
plainly
within
specialized
judicial
competence
completely
commonplace
gainey
supra
indeed
presumption
apparently
enacted
relieve
government
burden
adduce
evidence
every
trial
none
introduced
prosecution
petitioner
trial
since
determination
presumption
constitutionality
highly
empirical
follows
must
canvass
available
pertinent
data
course
must
kept
mind
significant
weight
accorded
capacity
congress
amass
stuff
actual
experience
cull
conclusions
ibid
however
quickly
becomes
apparent
legislative
record
supply
adequate
basis
upon
judge
soundness
knowledge
part
presumption
therefore
taken
materials
account
well
effort
sustain
presumption
confined
data
available
time
presumption
enacted
also
considered
recent
information
order
obtain
broader
general
background
ascertain
whether
intervening
years
witnessed
significant
changes
might
bear
upon
presumption
validity
noted
decide
whether
presumption
illegal
importation
constitutional
however
view
paucity
direct
evidence
beliefs
marihuana
smokers
generally
source
marihuana
found
desirable
survey
data
concerning
proportion
domestically
consumed
marihuana
foreign
origin
since
absence
better
information
proportion
marihuana
actually
imported
surely
relevant
deciding
whether
marihuana
possessors
know
marihuana
imported
hand
written
material
inserted
record
senate
hearings
included
former
testimony
experienced
federal
customs
agent
another
senate
committee
effect
marihuana
grown
near
texas
cities
laredo
brownsville
written
report
ohio
attorney
general
recited
marihuana
may
grow
unnoticed
along
roadsides
vacant
lots
many
parts
country
philadelphia
police
academy
bulletin
stated
plenty
marihuana
found
growing
city
examination
periodicals
books
published
since
enactment
presumption
leaves
doubt
dozen
intervening
years
great
changes
extent
nature
marihuana
use
country
respect
quantity
one
readily
available
statistic
indicative
amount
marihuana
seized
country
federal
authorities
jumped
pounds
pounds
regard
nature
use
hearing
records
reports
portray
marihuana
smoking
time
activity
almost
exclusively
unemployed
menially
employed
members
racial
minorities
current
periodicals
books
hand
indicate
marihuana
smoking
become
common
many
college
campuses
among
persons
voluntarily
dropped
american
society
protest
values
marihuana
smokers
include
sizeable
number
young
professional
persons
despite
undoubted
changes
materials
examined
point
quite
strongly
conclusion
domestically
consumed
marihuana
still
foreign
origin
six
years
marihuana
seized
federal
authorities
seized
attempted
smuggling
ports
borders
government
informs
us
considerable
part
internally
seized
marihuana
bore
indications
foreign
origin
possible
facts
reflect
deployment
federal
narcotics
forces
rather
actual
proportion
imported
domestic
marihuana
almost
authorities
consulted
confirm
preponderance
domestically
consumed
marihuana
grown
mexico
petitioner
makes
much
statistics
showing
number
acres
domestic
marihuana
destroyed
annually
state
federal
authorities
pointing
harvested
destroyed
acreage
year
accounted
marihuana
estimated
consumed
one
knows
many
acres
escape
destruction
however
several
factors
weaken
argument
domestic
growth
first
number
acres
annually
destroyed
declined
factor
three
period
consumption
marihuana
measured
federal
seizures
rose
assuming
constant
diligence
part
charged
destruction
indicate
much
smaller
share
market
domestically
supplied
second
total
number
acres
annually
destroyed
indeed
large
enough
furnish
domestically
consumed
marihuana
breakdowns
available
years
reveal
years
destroyed
acreage
two
midwestern
illinois
minnesota
large
recurrent
marihuana
acreages
discovered
plausibly
ascribed
volunteer
growth
old
plantings
middle
west
commissioner
anslinger
testified
illicit
cultivators
marihuana
likely
choose
sparser
populations
favorable
climates
third
last
reports
bureau
narcotics
testimony
agents
indicate
investigations
bureau
never
encountered
system
distributing
sizeable
quantities
domestically
grown
marihuana
contrast
bureau
found
evidence
many
distribution
systems
sources
mexico
legitimate
possession
opium
unless
medicinal
use
highly
improbable
say
person
obtains
outlawed
commodity
since
bound
know
brought
country
except
regulation
medicinal
use
must
peril
ascertain
prepared
show
facts
circumstances
rebut
tend
rebut
natural
inference
unlawful
importation
knowledge
unreasonable
requirement
cause
fall
outside
constitutional
power
congress
even
assume
previously
assembled
data
sufficient
justify
inference
illegal
importation
see
supra
means
follows
majority
marihuana
possessors
know
marihuana
illegally
imported
proposition
depend
upon
intermediate
premise
marihuana
possessors
aware
level
importation
deduced
marihuana
grown
abroad
intermediate
step
might
thought
justified
common
sense
proved
little
marihuana
grown
country
short
showing
present
believe
inference
knowledge
sustained
solely
assumed
validity
importation
presumption
established
significant
percentage
domestically
consumed
marihuana
may
imported
longer
postulated
without
proof
possessors
even
roughly
aware
proportion
actually
imported
conclude
order
sustain
inference
knowledge
must
find
basis
available
materials
majority
marihuana
possessors
either
cognizant
apparently
high
rate
importation
otherwise
become
aware
marihuana
grown
abroad
imagine
five
ways
possessor
might
acquire
knowledge
might
aware
proportion
domestically
consumed
marihuana
smuggled
abroad
deduce
illegally
imported
might
smuggled
marihuana
might
learned
indirect
means
marihuana
consumed
locality
furnished
supplier
smuggled
abroad
might
specified
foreign
marihuana
making
buy
might
told
source
marihuana
supplier
might
able
tell
source
appearance
packaging
taste
marihuana
treat
five
possibilities
seriatim
light
available
materials
beginning
instance
legislative
record
note
outset
although
able
discover
good
deal
relevant
secondary
evidence
found
none
best
kind
possible
testimony
marihuana
users
beliefs
origin
studies
based
upon
interviews
users
asked
matter
committee
hearings
preceded
passage
included
testimony
many
marihuana
smokers
none
ever
asked
whether
knew
origin
marihuana
smoked
also
kept
mind
great
preponderance
marihuana
smokers
occasional
rather
regular
users
drug
occasional
smokers
appear
arrested
disproportionately
often
due
inexpertness
taking
precautions
occasional
users
likely
less
informed
less
particular
drug
smoke
hence
less
probable
learned
source
ways
first
possibility
possessor
may
known
proportion
imported
domestic
marihuana
deduced
marihuana
grown
abroad
legislative
record
assistance
evaluating
possibility
indirect
evidence
found
points
conclusion
marihuana
users
probably
know
marihuana
comes
mexico
also
likely
great
majority
either
knowledge
proportion
imported
believe
proportion
considerably
lower
may
actually
case
second
possibility
possessor
may
know
origin
marihuana
smuggled
legislative
record
unhelpful
estimating
proportion
possessors
fall
class
sources
indicate
considerable
number
smokers
smuggle
great
majority
possessors
obtained
marihuana
suppliers
country
legislative
record
also
uninformative
possibility
possessor
may
learned
source
marihuana
indirect
means
sources
reveal
imported
marihuana
usually
passes
number
hands
reaching
consumer
distribution
system
kept
secret
appear
relatively
consumers
know
origin
marihuana
indirect
means
fourth
possibility
possessor
may
specified
foreign
marihuana
making
purchase
may
told
supplier
marihuana
grown
abroad
legislative
record
somewhat
helpful
respect
possibility
contain
statements
effect
mexican
marihuana
potent
domestic
consequently
preferred
smokers
however
legislative
record
also
contains
testimony
customs
agent
texas
marihuana
good
mexico
authorities
state
mexican
marihuana
generally
greater
intoxicating
power
domestic
marihuana
due
higher
temperatures
lower
humidity
usually
encountered
mexico
indications
smokers
likely
prefer
mexican
marihuana
nothing
show
purchasers
commonly
specify
mexican
marihuana
making
buy
appears
suppliers
marihuana
occasionally
volunteer
place
origin
found
hint
usually
done
indications
information
volunteered
buyer
may
reluctant
ask
fear
thought
informer
simply
unable
estimate
accuracy
basis
data
proportion
marihuana
possessors
learned
origin
marihuana
way
certainly
majority
whether
small
minority
large
one
unable
tell
fifth
possibility
smoker
may
able
tell
source
marihuana
appearance
packaging
taste
appearance
seems
one
species
marihuana
even
experts
unable
tell
eye
particular
sample
grown
appeals
ninth
circuit
find
caudillo
basis
trial
testimony
unmanicured
rough
marihuana
marihuana
containing
seeds
stems
well
leaves
much
likely
come
mexico
california
presence
seeds
implied
plant
allowed
mature
evidence
showed
california
growers
almost
always
harvested
plant
stage
however
found
nothing
indicate
distinction
holds
good
areas
country
marihuana
possessors
likely
realize
significance
respect
packaging
evidence
mexican
marihuana
commonly
compressed
distinctive
bricks
wrapped
characteristically
mexican
paper
yet
even
assumed
mexican
marihuana
bears
distinguishing
marks
first
brought
country
indication
normally
still
present
reaches
consumer
packaging
method
mentioned
apparently
intended
facilitate
transportation
relatively
large
quantities
marihuana
brick
appears
usually
contain
one
kilogram
marihuana
relatively
consumer
sales
involve
large
amount
since
kilogram
marihuana
furnish
marihuana
cigarettes
smokers
appear
usually
purchase
marihuana
bag
ounce
one
ounce
pound
hence
importation
wholesalers
repackage
marihuana
smaller
packages
various
ways
infer
small
percentage
smokers
likely
learn
drug
origin
packaging
respect
taste
senate
hearing
record
contains
statement
federal
customs
agent
good
marihuana
smoker
probably
tell
good
marihuana
bad
seen
preponderance
opinion
effect
mexican
marihuana
potent
domestic
one
authority
purchasers
marihuana
commonly
sample
product
making
buy
however
agent
quoted
also
asserted
good
marihuana
grown
texas
account
sampling
custom
tasting
merely
ritual
since
sually
intoxication
differ
much
one
cigarette
another
simply
unable
estimate
proportion
marihuana
possessors
capable
placing
marihuana
possession
taste
much
less
proportion
actually
done
time
arrested
find
impossible
make
determination
seen
materials
disposal
leave
us
large
estimate
even
roughly
proportion
marihuana
possessors
learned
one
way
another
origin
marihuana
must
also
recognized
inconsiderable
proportion
domestically
consumed
marihuana
appears
grown
country
possessors
must
taken
known
anything
marihuana
illegally
imported
short
speculation
say
even
much
majority
possessors
knew
source
marihuana
deficiencies
foundation
knowledge
presumption
overcome
paying
utmost
deference
congressional
determination
presumption
warranted
congress
less
subject
constitutional
requirements
instance
legislative
record
falls
even
shorter
furnishing
adequate
foundation
knowledge
presumption
extensive
materials
examined
thus
escape
duty
setting
aside
petitioner
conviction
count
indictment
reasons
stated
part
opinion
reverse
outright
judgment
conviction
count
indictment
reasons
stated
part
ii
reverse
judgment
conviction
count
remand
case
appeals
proceedings
consistent
opinion
constrained
add
nothing
hold
today
implies
constitutional
disability
congress
deal
marihuana
traffic
means
reversed
remanded
footnotes
notwithstanding
provision
law
whoever
knowingly
intent
defraud
imports
brings
marihuana
contrary
law
smuggles
clandestinely
introduces
marihuana
invoiced
receives
conceals
buys
sells
manner
facilitates
transportation
concealment
sale
marihuana
imported
brought
knowing
imported
brought
contrary
law
whoever
conspires
foregoing
acts
shall
imprisoned
whenever
trial
violation
subsection
defendant
shown
marihuana
possession
possession
shall
deemed
sufficient
evidence
authorize
conviction
unless
defendant
explains
possession
satisfaction
jury
see
supra
insofar
relevant
provides
shall
unlawful
person
transferee
required
pay
transfer
tax
imposed
section
acquire
otherwise
obtain
marihuana
without
paid
tax
transport
conceal
manner
facilitate
transportation
concealment
marihuana
acquired
obtained
petitioner
testified
without
contradiction
obtained
marihuana
new
york
district
apparently
reasoned
article
taken
smuggled
back
country
charged
indictment
see
appendix
transcript
record
cf
claybourn
supp
see
petitioner
tentatively
sentenced
years
prison
fine
violation
years
prison
fine
violation
see
prison
sentences
run
consecutively
lowest
penalty
conviction
five
years
imprisonment
suspension
sentence
probation
parole
permitted
following
conviction
see
quoting
reg
boyes
quoting
albertson
sacb
ibid
transferor
secondarily
liable
tax
see
exceptions
include
transfers
prescription
medical
practitioner
legal
exportation
foreign
countries
transfers
government
officials
transfers
marihuana
seeds
persons
registered
requires
list
persons
paid
special
taxes
subtitles
internal
revenue
code
kept
public
inspection
principal
internal
revenue
office
list
furnished
state
local
prosecutors
request
apparently
apply
payors
transfer
taxes
see
haynes
relevant
text
set
supra
marchetti
also
possible
compliance
act
also
created
substantial
risk
incrimination
federal
statute
petitioner
convicted
violating
relevant
text
reproduced
supra
however
danger
incrimination
state
law
plain
possibility
need
explored
time
petitioner
failed
comply
act
district
columbia
books
form
essentially
provisions
uniform
narcotic
drug
act
see
uniform
laws
ann
section
act
shall
unlawful
person
possess
narcotic
drug
except
authorized
act
section
defines
narcotic
drugs
include
marihuana
cannabis
remaining
two
california
pennsylvania
also
statutes
making
crime
possess
marihuana
see
cal
health
safety
code
stat
tit
new
york
texas
effect
statutory
provisions
substantially
identical
sections
uniform
act
new
york
see
pub
health
law
subd
supp
texas
see
tex
pen
code
art
new
york
possession
amount
marihuana
misdemeanor
punishable
year
imprisonment
see
pen
law
supp
see
also
subd
supp
texas
possession
felony
punishable
imprisonment
less
two
years
life
see
tex
pen
code
art
see
uniform
narcotic
drug
act
uniform
laws
ann
pub
health
law
supp
tex
pen
code
art
see
see
exempt
persons
receive
marihuana
medical
prescription
directly
medical
practitioner
title
exempts
transfers
public
officials
design
act
strongly
suggests
delivery
marihuana
employee
agent
registrant
considered
transfer
registrant
see
cfr
delivery
common
carrier
considered
transfer
addressee
see
cfr
government
argues
per
ounce
tax
intended
collected
civilly
found
engaged
illegal
transfers
see
brief
see
also
sanchez
decisions
marchetti
grosso
haynes
district
directors
instructed
applications
nonregistrants
disclosed
simply
returned
applicants
see
brief
see
supra
see
hearings
house
committee
ways
means
see
ibid
hearings
house
committee
ways
means
doubts
bill
constitutionality
occasioned
dissenting
opinions
doremus
nigro
see
hearings
supra
hearings
subcommittee
senate
committee
finance
ibid
ibid
ibid
see
regulations
cfr
see
supra
limit
registration
persons
whose
marihuana
dealings
legal
relevant
state
local
laws
require
result
urged
government
fact
strong
support
legislative
history
proposition
illicit
consumers
marihuana
like
petitioner
entitled
register
house
senate
reports
testimony
hester
subcommittee
senate
finance
committee
state
identical
language
nder
bill
provisions
legitimate
handlers
marihuana
required
pay
occupational
taxes
hearings
subcommittee
senate
committee
finance
testimony
house
ways
means
committee
hester
stated
explicitly
consume
marihuana
eligible
register
bill
hearings
house
committee
ways
means
see
see
also
davis
administrative
law
treatise
cases
cited
see
generally
see
brief
sanchez
holding
give
rise
additional
knotty
questions
whether
petitioner
nonpayment
transfer
tax
excused
actual
assumed
reliance
upon
erroneous
administrative
construction
statute
permitted
pay
cf
james
grosso
quoting
albertson
sacb
see
also
grosso
supra
haynes
supra
see
appendix
see
appendix
course
holding
petitioner
waived
right
plead
reliance
erroneous
administrative
interpretation
require
consideration
question
mentioned
supra
whether
reliance
provide
defense
first
asked
direct
examination
paid
transfer
tax
petitioner
stated
well
knew
get
permission
also
know
applied
transfer
tax
stamp
probably
subject
investigation
appendix
response
similar
subsequent
question
petitioner
said
certain
able
pay
tax
marihuana
taken
away
subjected
action
appendix
asked
whether
honest
belief
obtain
order
form
petitioner
replied
strong
honest
belief
get
cause
lot
publicity
trouble
government
trying
cause
trouble
appendix
noted
first
count
charged
smuggling
violation
district
dismissed
count
see
supra
see
appendix
respect
theory
trial
judge
stated
near
end
charge
jury
might
difficulty
question
count
mention
second
time
might
confused
question
importation
talking
necessarily
importation
government
contends
importation
bridge
defendant
told
us
received
marihuana
new
york
statute
course
application
throughout
land
presumption
still
apply
narcotic
imported
illegally
knew
imported
illegally
unless
explains
possession
satisfaction
jury
appendix
see
transcript
record
see
transcript
record
transcript
record
think
irrelevant
petitioner
testified
trial
knowledge
marihuana
origin
government
put
affirmative
evidence
knowledge
jury
instructed
convict
theory
relying
upon
presumption
permit
inference
knowledge
trial
judge
mention
petitioner
testimony
point
instructions
jury
since
presumption
terms
rebuttable
intended
implication
must
jury
convict
basis
presumption
disbelieved
testimony
cf
caudillo
one
test
whether
rational
connection
basic
fact
presumed
fact
see
mobile
turnipseed
mcfarland
american
sugar
rfg
western
atl
henderson
cf
yee
hem
second
whether
legislature
might
made
crime
thing
presumption
authorized
inference
see
ferry
ramsey
third
whether
convenient
defendant
prosecution
adduce
evidence
presumed
fact
see
morrison
california
cf
rossi
yee
hem
supra
section
federal
firearms
act
stat
mobile
turnipseed
see
supra
see
ibid
example
argued
tot
order
regulate
interstate
commerce
firearms
congress
might
prohibited
possession
firearms
persons
convicted
crimes
violence
declared
even
less
reason
conclude
possession
acquisition
occurred
subsequent
effective
date
firearms
act
like
tot
limited
romano
consideration
crime
congress
actually
defined
observed
congress
chosen
make
presence
illegal
still
crime
declar
ed
presence
sufficient
evidence
prove
crime
possession
beyond
reasonable
doubt
concluded
approach
obviously
fails
standards
traditionally
applied
legislation
since
find
presumption
unconstitutional
standard
need
reach
question
whether
criminal
presumption
passes
muster
judged
must
also
satisfy
criminal
reasonable
doubt
standard
proof
crime
charged
essential
element
thereof
depends
upon
use
cf
adams
supp
see
also
romano
supra
comment
constitutionality
statutory
criminal
presumptions
chi
rev
presumption
also
permits
inference
third
element
importation
bringing
intent
defraud
permissibility
inference
one
questions
presented
leary
petition
certiorari
view
take
branch
case
occasion
consider
see
transcript
record
petitioner
attempted
introduce
evidence
concerning
proportion
domestically
consumed
marihuana
fact
grown
district
held
irrelevant
therefore
inadmissible
see
transcript
record
see
supra
statute
based
upon
legislative
declaration
facts
subject
constitutional
attack
ground
facts
longer
exist
ruling
upon
challenge
must
course
free
factual
declaration
see
block
hirsh
communist
party
sacb
see
conf
cong
rec
hearings
traffic
control
narcotics
barbiturates
amphetamines
subcommittee
house
committee
ways
means
cong
hereinafter
cited
house
hearings
hearings
illicit
narcotics
traffic
subcommittee
improvements
federal
criminal
code
senate
committee
judiciary
sess
hereinafter
cited
senate
hearings
senate
hearings
see
house
hearings
senate
hearings
see
also
house
hearings
senate
hearings
cong
rec
see
senate
hearings
see
also
senate
hearings
compare
bureau
narcotics
report
traffic
opium
dangerous
drugs
seizures
estimated
present
marihuana
actually
smuggled
see
appendix
see
rosevear
pot
handbook
marihuana
bouquet
cannabis
parts
bull
narcotics
mayor
committee
marihuana
marihuana
problem
city
new
york
blum
drugs
dangerous
behavior
dangerous
drugs
president
commission
law
enforcement
administration
justice
task
force
report
narcotics
drug
abuse
see
rosevear
supra
bureau
narcotics
report
traffic
opium
dangerous
drugs
blum
supra
cahn
user
law
simmons
ed
marihuana
myths
realities
mcglothlin
toward
rational
view
marihuana
simmons
ed
supra
see
bureau
narcotics
report
traffic
opium
dangerous
drugs
see
brief
see
bureau
narcotics
report
traffic
opium
dangerous
drugs
mandel
myths
realities
marihuana
pushing
simmons
ed
marihuana
myths
realities
president
commission
law
enforcement
administration
justice
report
challenge
crime
free
society
simmons
ed
supra
government
report
working
international
treaties
narcotic
drugs
contra
see
transcript
pretrial
hearing
july
adams
supp
testimony
richard
schultes
director
harvard
botanic
museum
hereafter
transcript
see
also
rosevear
pot
handbook
marihuana
acres
destroyed
see
government
report
working
international
treaties
narcotic
drugs
accepting
bureau
narcotics
lowest
estimate
yield
per
acre
see
brief
acreage
supplied
pounds
marihuana
enough
marihuana
cigarettes
see
infra
compare
bureau
narcotics
report
traffic
opium
dangerous
drugs
government
report
working
international
treaties
narcotic
drugs
decline
steady
compare
bureau
narcotics
report
traffic
opium
dangerous
drugs
see
supra
see
bureau
narcotics
report
traffic
opium
dangerous
drugs
government
report
working
international
treaties
narcotic
drugs
see
supra
authorities
believe
potent
marihuana
grown
hot
dry
climate
see
infra
see
bureau
narcotics
reports
traffic
opium
dangerous
drugs
transcript
pretrial
hearing
july
adams
supp
hereafter
transcript
government
report
working
international
treaties
narcotic
drugs
cf
senate
hearings
see
bureau
narcotics
report
traffic
opium
dangerous
drugs
seizure
pounds
mexican
marihuana
seizure
one
ton
mexican
marihuana
seizure
tons
mexican
marihuana
id
seizure
pounds
mexican
marihuana
contrast
largest
reported
seizure
marihuana
definitely
grown
involved
eight
pounds
see
see
also
senate
hearings
see
supra
refusing
follow
aspect
reasoning
yee
hem
intimate
opinion
whatever
continued
validity
presumption
relating
hard
narcotics
sustained
yee
hem
found
appear
holding
knowledge
presumption
unconstitutional
rests
entirely
upon
detailed
inquiry
available
facts
state
mind
marihuana
users
facts
regarding
hard
narcotics
may
well
significantly
different
nothing
legislative
history
aid
determining
intended
scope
word
knowing
used
section
making
determination
employed
general
guide
definition
knowledge
appears
proposed
official
draft
model
penal
code
code
provides
knowledge
existence
particular
fact
element
offense
knowledge
established
person
aware
high
probability
existence
unless
actually
believes
exist
see
rosevear
pot
handbook
marihuana
estimated
regular
marihuana
smokers
occasional
users
see
simmons
ed
marihuana
myths
realities
see
rosevear
supra
see
ibid
see
adams
supp
see
becker
marihuana
sociological
overview
solomon
ed
marihuana
papers
mandel
myths
realities
marihuana
pushing
simmons
ed
supra
rosevear
supra
simmons
ed
supra
remembered
estimated
least
regular
occasional
marihuana
smokers
see
supra
see
authorities
cited
supra
see
supra
testimony
commissioner
anslinger
house
hearings
senate
hearings
statements
district
supervisor
aman
see
senate
hearings
see
also
house
hearings
see
authorities
referred
hodapp
marihuana
review
literature
analytical
chemists
bouquet
cannabis
parts
bull
narcotics
ciba
foundation
study
group
hashish
chemistry
pharmacology
simmons
ed
supra
see
authorities
cited
supra
rosevear
supra
boughey
pot
scenes
east
west
simmons
ed
supra
mayor
committee
marihuana
marihuana
problem
city
new
york
simmons
ed
supra
see
rosevear
supra
see
see
transcript
testimony
richard
schultes
director
harvard
botanic
museum
see
testimony
narcotics
agent
william
durkin
see
also
bureau
narcotics
report
traffic
opium
dangerous
drugs
cf
senate
hearings
see
simmons
ed
supra
rosevear
supra
bureau
narcotics
report
traffic
opium
dangerous
drugs
see
also
senate
hearings
see
rosevear
supra
mandel
myths
realities
marihuana
pushing
simmons
ed
supra
senate
hearings
see
rosevear
supra
see
also
mandel
supra
transcript
testimony
narcotics
agent
william
durkin
senate
hearings
prior
testimony
customs
agent
lawrence
fleishman
see
supra
see
rosevear
supra
careful
examination
decisions
regarding
presumption
constitutionality
suggest
contrary
courts
appeals
ruled
question
sustained
presumption
see
caudillo
cir
costello
cir
soto
cir
borne
cir
gibson
cir
however
indication
cases
took
account
even
fraction
evidence
considered
one
instance
lack
evidence
expressly
stated
ground
decision
see
gibson
supra
see
also
costello
supra
lower
conducted
factual
inquiry
way
comparable
also
held
presumption
unconstitutional
see
adams
supp
justice
stewart
concurring
join
part
ii
opinion
part
expressed
conviction
fifth
amendment
guarantee
compulsory
originally
intended
confer
testimonial
privilege
judicial
proceeding
years
drifted
far
mooring
marchetti
grosso
cases
simply
recent
long
line
decisions
marking
extent
drift
perhaps
day
consider
fundamental
decisions
area
light
original
constitutional
meaning
day
comes
seems
authoritative
weight
precedent
permits
escape
conclusion
reached
case
therefore
join
opinion
judgment
see
grosso
concurring
opinion
gault
dissenting
opinion
marchetti
grosso
justice
black
concurring
result
concur
outright
reversal
petitioner
conviction
count
indictment
reasons
set
part
opinion
also
concur
reversal
petitioner
conviction
count
indictment
based
section
makes
crime
import
marihuana
receive
conceal
transport
knowing
imported
contrary
law
goes
provide
mere
possession
marihuana
shall
deemed
sufficient
evidence
authorize
conviction
unless
defendant
explains
possession
satisfaction
jury
trial
case
charged
jury
proof
petitioner
merely
possession
marihuana
sufficient
authorize
finding
knew
imported
brought
contrary
law
clear
beyond
doubt
fact
possession
alone
enough
support
inference
possessor
knew
imported
congress
constitutional
power
tell
jury
convict
upon
forced
baseless
inference
power
tell
juries
convict
defendant
crime
without
evidence
inference
guilt
drawn
see
thompson
louisville
system
separation
powers
congress
incompetent
instruct
judge
jury
american
evidence
enough
conviction
courts
tell
congress
policies
must
adopt
writing
criminal
laws
congressional
presumption
therefore
violates
constitutional
right
defendant
tried
jury
set
accordance
commands
constitution
clearly
deprives
defendant
right
convicted
punished
crime
without
due
process
law
federal
case
trial
independent
judge
indictment
grand
jury
representation
counsel
opportunity
summon
witnesses
behalf
opportunity
confront
witnesses
right
trial
law
guaranteed
every
defendant
article
iii
constitution
sixth
amendment
fifth
fourteenth
amendments
promises
person
shall
deprived
life
liberty
property
without
due
process
law
trial
according
law
land
constitutional
statutory
reasons
think
law
irrational
arbitrary
hence
unconstitutional
ante
invalidate
presumption
firmly
profoundly
opposed
construing
due
process
authorizing
invalidate
statutes
nebulous
grounds
quite
different
reasons
holding
presumption
deny
due
process
law
benefit
law
land
fully
set
many
opinions
including
illustration
concurring
opinion
tot
dissenting
opinion
gainey