bullington
missouri
argued
january
decided
may
missouri
law
provides
two
possible
sentences
defendant
convicted
capital
murder
death
life
imprisonment
without
eligibility
probation
parole
years
state
statutes
separate
presentence
hearing
additional
evidence
mitigation
aggravation
punishment
heard
must
held
jury
found
defendant
guilty
prosecution
must
prove
existence
aggravating
circumstances
beyond
reasonable
doubt
death
penalty
may
imposed
jury
imposes
death
penalty
must
designate
writing
aggravating
circumstance
circumstances
finds
beyond
reasonable
doubt
phase
petitioner
trial
resulted
verdict
guilty
capital
murder
presentence
hearing
resulted
jury
additional
verdict
fixing
petitioner
punishment
life
imprisonment
without
eligibility
probation
parole
years
granting
petitioner
motion
new
trial
intervening
decision
duren
missouri
held
missouri
allowing
automatic
exemption
women
jury
service
unconstitutional
trial
announced
grant
petitioner
motion
based
double
jeopardy
grounds
strike
prosecution
notice
intended
seek
death
penalty
basis
aggravating
circumstances
sought
prove
first
trial
missouri
appeals
denied
state
request
writ
prohibition
mandamus
missouri
ultimately
granted
writ
prohibition
held
missouri
law
sentencing
proceeding
petitioner
first
trial
like
trial
question
guilt
innocence
protection
afforded
double
jeopardy
clause
one
acquitted
jury
available
respect
death
penalty
retrial
reasoning
stroud
controlling
pp
generally
concluded
imposition
particular
sentence
usually
regarded
acquittal
severe
sentence
imposed
double
jeopardy
clause
imposes
absolute
prohibition
imposition
harsher
sentence
retrial
defendant
succeeded
original
conviction
set
aside
see
north
carolina
pearce
chaffin
stynchcombe
stroud
supra
difrancesco
however
cases
unlike
present
case
sentencing
procedures
hallmarks
trial
guilt
innocence
first
three
cases
separate
sentencing
proceeding
prosecution
required
prove
additional
facts
order
justify
particular
sentence
sentencer
discretion
determining
punishment
essentially
unfettered
although
difrancesco
supra
involved
separate
sentencing
procedure
prosecution
required
prove
additional
fact
warranting
harsher
penalty
preponderance
evidence
sentencer
choice
punishment
far
broader
two
choices
available
petitioner
jury
missouri
law
pp
rationale
burks
held
defendant
may
retried
obtains
reversal
conviction
ground
evidence
insufficient
convict
relevant
usual
sentencing
proceeding
impossible
absence
sentencing
standards
conclude
sentence
less
statutory
maximum
constitutes
decision
effect
prosecution
failed
prove
case
enacting
capital
sentencing
procedure
resembles
trial
issue
guilt
innocence
missouri
explicitly
requires
jury
determine
whether
prosecution
proved
case
petitioner
sentence
life
imprisonment
first
trial
meant
jury
already
acquitted
whatever
necessary
impose
death
sentence
pp
blackmun
delivered
opinion
brennan
stewart
marshall
stevens
joined
powell
filed
dissenting
opinion
burger
white
rehnquist
joined
post
richard
sindel
argued
cause
petitioner
brief
gail
gaus
james
cook
argued
cause
filed
brief
respondent
justice
blackmun
delivered
opinion
stroud
concerned
defendant
convicted
murder
sentenced
life
imprisonment
obtained
upon
confession
error
solicitor
general
reversal
conviction
new
trial
unanimous
vote
case
held
double
jeopardy
clause
fifth
amendment
bar
imposition
death
penalty
stroud
new
trial
convicted
issue
present
case
whether
reasoning
stroud
also
apply
system
jury
sentencing
decision
made
bifurcated
proceeding
second
stage
prosecution
burden
proving
certain
elements
beyond
reasonable
doubt
death
penalty
may
imposed
missouri
law
provides
two
two
possible
sentences
defendant
convicted
capital
murder
death
life
imprisonment
without
eligibility
probation
parole
years
mo
rev
stat
like
death
penalty
legislation
enacted
decision
furman
georgia
missouri
statutes
contain
substantive
standards
guide
discretion
sentencer
statutes
also
afford
procedural
safeguards
convicted
defendant
section
provides
trial
shall
conduct
separate
presentence
hearing
defendant
convicted
jury
capital
murder
hearing
must
held
jury
found
defendant
guilty
additional
evidence
extenuation
mitigation
aggravation
punishment
shall
heard
evidence
aggravation
prosecution
made
known
defendant
prior
trial
shall
admissible
jury
must
consider
whether
evidence
shows
exist
aggravating
circumstances
mitigating
circumstances
specified
statute
see
whether
mitigating
aggravating
circumstances
authorized
law
exist
whether
aggravating
circumstances
exist
sufficient
warrant
imposition
death
penalty
whether
mitigating
circumstances
exist
outweigh
aggravating
circumstances
jury
imposes
death
penalty
must
designate
writing
aggravating
circumstance
circumstances
finds
beyond
reasonable
doubt
also
must
convinced
beyond
reasonable
doubt
aggravating
circumstance
circumstances
finds
exist
sufficient
warrant
imposition
death
penalty
missouri
approved
instructions
criminal
missouri
jury
instructed
compelled
impose
death
penalty
even
decides
sufficient
aggravating
circumstance
circumstances
exist
outweighed
mitigating
circumstance
circumstances
jury
decision
impose
death
penalty
must
unanimous
jury
unable
agree
defendant
receives
alternative
sentence
life
imprisonment
described
ii
december
petitioner
robert
bullington
indicted
louis
county
capital
murder
crimes
arising
abduction
young
woman
subsequent
death
drowning
circuit
louis
county
granted
petitioner
pretrial
motion
change
venue
jackson
county
western
part
state
prosecution
letter
informed
defense
state
seek
death
penalty
jury
convicted
defendant
capital
murder
app
stated
prosecution
present
evidence
two
aggravating
circumstances
specified
statute
offense
committed
person
substantial
history
serious
assaultive
criminal
convictions
offense
outrageously
wantonly
vile
horrible
inhuman
involved
torture
depravity
mind
phase
petitioner
trial
jury
returned
verdict
guilty
capital
murder
app
following
day
trial
proceeded
hold
presentence
hearing
required
evidence
submitted
prosecution
received
none
offered
defense
argument
counsel
instructions
judge
deliberation
jury
returned
additional
verdict
fixing
petitioner
punishment
death
imprisonment
life
without
eligibility
probation
parole
years
app
petitioner
moved
various
grounds
judgment
acquittal
alternative
new
trial
motion
pending
duren
missouri
decided
case
held
missouri
constitutional
statutory
provisions
allowing
women
claim
automatic
exemption
jury
service
deprived
defendant
sixth
fourteenth
amendments
right
jury
drawn
fair
community
trial
overruled
petitioner
motion
acquittal
relying
upon
duren
granted
motion
new
trial
app
soon
thereafter
prosecution
served
filed
formal
notice
evidence
aggravation
stating
intended
seek
death
penalty
notice
specified
aggravating
circumstances
state
sought
prove
first
trial
see
also
tr
oral
arg
asserted
introduce
evidence
previously
disclosed
defense
counsel
app
defense
moved
strike
notice
arguing
double
jeopardy
clause
fifth
amendment
made
applicable
fourteenth
amendment
benton
maryland
barred
imposition
penalty
death
first
jury
declined
impose
death
sentence
trial
announced
grant
motion
permit
state
seek
death
penalty
issued
formal
order
effect
prosecution
sought
writ
prohibition
mandamus
missouri
appeals
western
district
granting
temporary
stop
order
app
appeals
without
opinion
denied
state
request
dissolved
stop
order
missouri
however
granted
prosecution
motion
transfer
case
issued
preliminary
writ
prohibition
argument
sitting
en
banc
divided
vote
sustained
state
position
made
writ
absolute
state
ex
rel
westfall
mason
held
neither
double
jeopardy
clause
eighth
amendment
due
process
clause
barred
imposition
death
penalty
upon
petitioner
new
trial
allowing
prosecution
seek
capital
punishment
impermissibly
chill
defendant
effort
seek
redress
constitutional
violation
committed
initial
trial
granted
certiorari
order
consider
important
issues
raised
petitioner
regarding
administration
death
penalty
iii
well
established
double
jeopardy
clause
forbids
retrial
defendant
acquitted
crime
charged
difrancesco
burks
martin
linen
supply
fong
foo
green
however
resisted
attempts
extend
principle
sentencing
imposition
particular
sentence
usually
regarded
acquittal
severe
sentence
imposed
generally
concluded
therefore
double
jeopardy
clause
imposes
absolute
prohibition
imposition
harsher
sentence
retrial
defendant
succeeded
original
conviction
set
aside
see
north
carolina
pearce
see
also
difrancesco
chaffin
stynchcombe
stroud
procedure
resulted
imposition
sentence
life
imprisonment
upon
petitioner
bullington
first
trial
however
differs
significantly
employed
cases
double
jeopardy
clause
held
inapplicable
sentencing
jury
case
given
unbounded
discretion
select
appropriate
punishment
wide
range
authorized
statute
rather
separate
hearing
required
held
jury
presented
choice
two
alternatives
standards
guide
making
choice
prosecution
simply
recommend
felt
appropriate
punishment
undertook
burden
establishing
certain
facts
beyond
reasonable
doubt
quest
obtain
harsher
two
alternative
verdicts
presentence
hearing
resembled
indeed
relevant
respects
like
immediately
preceding
trial
issue
guilt
innocence
trial
issue
punishment
precisely
defined
missouri
statutes
contrast
sentencing
procedures
considered
previous
cases
hallmarks
trial
guilt
innocence
pearce
chaffin
stroud
separate
sentencing
proceeding
prosecution
required
prove
beyond
reasonable
doubt
otherwise
additional
facts
order
justify
particular
sentence
cases
moreover
sentencer
discretion
essentially
unfettered
stroud
standards
enacted
guide
jury
discretion
pearce
judge
wide
range
punishments
choose
explicit
standards
imposed
guide
chaffin
discretion
given
jury
extremely
broad
defendant
convicted
georgia
robbery
sentenced
death
life
imprisonment
prison
term
years
statute
contained
standards
guide
jury
exercise
discretion
one
prior
case
difrancesco
considered
separate
bifurcated
sentencing
procedure
necessary
prosecution
prove
additional
facts
federal
statute
consideration
dangerous
special
offender
provision
organized
crime
control
act
requires
separate
presentence
hearing
government
must
prove
additional
fact
defendant
dangerous
special
offender
defined
statute
order
impose
enhanced
sentence
highly
pertinent
differences
missouri
procedures
controlling
present
case
found
constitutional
difrancesco
federal
procedures
issue
difrancesco
include
appellate
review
sentence
record
sentencing
de
novo
proceeding
gives
government
opportunity
convince
second
factfinder
view
facts
moreover
choice
presented
federal
judge
far
broader
faced
state
jury
present
petitioner
trial
bullington
missouri
jury
given
state
statutes
given
two
choices
death
life
imprisonment
hand
federal
government
proves
person
convicted
felony
dangerous
special
offender
judge
may
sentence
person
appropriate
term
exceed
years
disproportionate
severity
maximum
term
otherwise
authorized
law
felony
finally
although
statute
requires
government
prove
additional
fact
defendant
dangerous
special
offender
need
preponderance
evidence
ibid
stands
contrast
standard
missouri
statute
standard
required
used
trial
issue
guilt
innocence
jackson
virginia
winship
state
use
standard
indicates
said
generally
criminal
case
interests
defendant
magnitude
protected
standards
proof
designed
exclude
nearly
possible
likelihood
erroneous
judgment
ur
society
imposes
almost
entire
risk
error
upon
addington
texas
iv
procedural
differences
become
important
underlying
rationale
cases
considered
state
relies
principally
upon
north
carolina
pearce
starting
point
case
established
rule
double
jeopardy
bar
retrying
defendant
succeeded
overturning
conviction
see
tateo
ball
stated
rule
rests
premise
original
conviction
nullified
slate
wiped
clean
therefore
defendant
convicted
constitutionally
may
subjected
whatever
punishment
lawful
subject
limitation
receive
credit
time
served
important
exception
however
rule
recognized
pearce
defendant
may
retried
obtains
reversal
conviction
ground
evidence
insufficient
convict
burks
reasons
exception
relevant
eversal
trial
error
distinguished
evidentiary
insufficiency
constitute
decision
effect
government
failed
prove
cases
implies
nothing
respect
guilt
innocence
defendant
said
defendant
conviction
overturned
due
failure
proof
trial
case
prosecution
complain
prejudice
given
one
fair
opportunity
offer
whatever
proof
assemble
since
necessarily
accord
absolute
finality
jury
verdict
acquittal
matter
erroneous
decision
difficult
conceive
society
greater
interest
retrying
defendant
review
decided
matter
law
jury
properly
returned
verdict
guilty
emphasis
original
thus
clean
slate
rationale
recognized
pearce
inapplicable
whenever
jury
agrees
appellate
decides
prosecution
proved
case
usual
sentencing
proceeding
however
impossible
conclude
sentence
less
statutory
maximum
constitute
decision
effect
government
failed
prove
case
normal
process
sentencing
virtually
rules
tests
standards
thus
issues
resolve
frankel
criminal
sentences
law
without
order
thus
discretion
judge
sentencing
matters
virtually
free
substantive
control
guidance
judge
power
select
term
imprisonment
within
range
exercise
authority
left
fairly
large
kadish
legal
norm
discretion
police
sentencing
processes
harv
rev
cases
considered
role
double
jeopardy
clause
sentencing
noted
absence
sentencing
standards
difrancesco
example
observed
sentence
characteristically
determined
large
part
basis
information
presentence
report
developed
outside
courtroom
purely
judicial
determination
much
goes
result
inquiry
nonadversary
nature
even
jury
imposes
sentence
ormally
way
jury
place
record
reasons
collective
sentencing
determination
chaffin
stynchcombe
enacting
capital
sentencing
procedure
resembles
trial
issue
guilt
innocence
however
missouri
explicitly
requires
jury
determine
whether
prosecution
proved
case
burks
green
noted
state
exception
general
rule
relied
upon
north
carolina
pearce
exception
applicable
therefore
refrain
extending
rationale
pearce
different
facts
present
case
chief
justice
bardgett
dissent
ruling
missouri
majority
observed
sentence
life
imprisonment
petitioner
received
first
trial
meant
jury
already
acquitted
defendant
whatever
necessary
impose
death
sentence
agree
verdict
acquittal
issue
guilt
innocence
course
absolutely
final
values
underlie
principle
stated
justice
black
equally
applicable
jury
rejected
state
claim
defendant
deserves
die
underlying
idea
one
deeply
ingrained
least
system
jurisprudence
state
resources
power
allowed
make
repeated
attempts
convict
individual
alleged
offense
thereby
subjecting
embarrassment
expense
ordeal
compelling
live
continuing
state
anxiety
insecurity
well
enhancing
possibility
even
though
innocent
may
found
guilty
green
already
held
many
protections
available
defendant
criminal
trial
also
available
sentencing
hearing
similar
required
missouri
capital
case
see
specht
patterson
due
process
protections
right
counsel
right
confront
witnesses
right
present
favorable
evidence
available
hearing
sentence
may
imposed
based
upon
new
finding
fact
ingredient
offense
charged
sentencing
proceeding
petitioner
first
trial
like
trial
question
guilt
innocence
protection
afforded
double
jeopardy
clause
one
acquitted
jury
also
available
respect
death
penalty
retrial
therefore
refrain
extending
reasoning
stroud
different
situation
judgment
missouri
reversed
case
remanded
proceedings
inconsistent
opinion
ordered
footnotes
definition
capital
murder
missouri
set
forth
mo
rev
stat
person
unlawfully
willfully
knowingly
deliberately
premeditation
kills
causes
killing
another
human
guilty
offense
capital
murder
section
reads
persons
convicted
offense
capital
murder
shall
judge
jury
recommends
complying
provisions
sections
punished
death
judge
jury
recommend
imposition
death
penalty
finding
guilty
capital
murder
convicted
person
shall
punished
imprisonment
division
corrections
natural
life
shall
eligible
probation
parole
served
minimum
fifty
years
sentence
relevant
times
read
pertinent
part
conclusion
trials
upon
indictment
information
capital
murder
heard
jury
argument
counsel
proper
charge
jury
shall
retire
consider
verdict
guilty
guilty
without
consideration
punishment
verdict
ascertain
whether
defendant
guilty
capital
murder
murder
first
degree
murder
second
degree
manslaughter
guilty
offense
jury
returns
verdict
finding
guilty
provided
subsection
section
shall
resume
trial
conduct
presentence
hearing
jury
time
issue
shall
determination
punishment
imposed
hearing
subject
laws
evidence
jury
shall
hear
additional
evidence
extenuation
mitigation
aggravation
punishment
including
record
prior
criminal
convictions
pleas
guilty
pleas
nolo
contendere
defendant
absence
prior
criminal
convictions
pleas
evidence
aggravation
prosecution
made
known
defendant
prior
trial
shall
admissible
jury
shall
also
hear
argument
defendant
counsel
prosecuting
attorney
regarding
punishment
imposed
prosecuting
attorney
shall
open
defendant
shall
conclude
argument
jury
upon
conclusion
evidence
arguments
judge
shall
give
jury
appropriate
instructions
jury
shall
retire
determine
punishment
imposed
capital
murder
cases
death
penalty
may
imposed
jury
additional
procedure
provided
section
shall
followed
jury
shall
fix
sentence
within
limits
prescribed
law
judge
shall
impose
sentence
fixed
jury
jury
within
reasonable
time
agree
punishment
judge
shall
impose
sentence
within
limits
law
except
judge
shall
instance
impose
death
penalty
cases
tried
jury
jury
agree
upon
punishment
trial
reversed
appeal
error
presentence
hearing
new
trial
may
ordered
shall
apply
issue
punishment
petitioner
case
sentenced
jury
first
trial
describe
missouri
procedure
imposition
death
penalty
jury
section
amended
provide
two
additional
specified
aggravating
circumstances
added
capital
murder
committed
defendant
engaged
perpetration
attempt
perpetrate
felony
rape
forcible
rape
felony
sodomy
forcible
sodomy
capital
murder
committed
defendant
purpose
preventing
person
killed
testifying
judicial
proceeding
mo
rev
stat
supp
petitioner
also
charged
state
crimes
kidnaping
armed
criminal
action
burglary
flourishing
dangerous
deadly
weapon
trial
petitioner
found
guilty
charges
although
proceedings
take
place
state
judgment
rejecting
petitioner
double
jeopardy
claim
final
within
meaning
jurisdictional
statute
harris
washington
see
abney
subsequent
decisions
furman
georgia
gregg
georgia
courts
least
two
concluded
defendant
originally
sentenced
life
imprisonment
may
sentenced
death
upon
retrial
reversal
original
conviction
texas
criminal
appeals
relied
upon
cases
construing
double
jeopardy
clause
sanne
state
brasfield
state
georgia
concluded
imposition
death
sentence
circumstances
violate
requirement
code
sentence
excessive
disproportionate
penalty
imposed
similar
cases
considering
crime
defendant
ward
state
statutorily
prescribed
presentence
hearing
counsel
make
opening
statements
testimony
taken
evidence
introduced
jury
instructed
final
arguments
made
jury
deliberates
returns
formal
punishment
verdict
see
supra
steps
taken
petitioner
presentence
hearing
following
first
trial
think
without
significance
pertinent
missouri
statute
speaks
specifically
presentence
hearing
terms
continuing
trial
section
verdict
guilty
capital
murder
returned
shall
resume
trial
conduct
presentence
hearing
emphasis
added
stroud
relevant
statute
provided
every
person
guilty
murder
first
degree
shall
suffer
death
jury
may
qualify
verdict
adding
thereto
without
capital
punishment
whenever
jury
shall
return
verdict
qualified
aforesaid
person
convicted
shall
sentenced
imprisonment
life
act
mar
stat
codified
currently
stroud
retrial
essentially
repeated
language
statute
jury
giving
guidance
appropriate
penalty
record
stroud
previous
trial
judge
told
jury
pretend
tell
various
considerations
come
determining
question
proper
sentence
record
stroud
pearce
convicted
assault
intent
commit
rape
state
crime
punishable
prison
term
years
stat
repealed
sess
laws
ch
replaced
discussing
usual
attributes
jury
sentencing
chaffin
observed
normally
way
jury
place
record
reasons
collective
sentencing
determination
ordinarily
resentencing
jury
informed
conduct
accused
unless
relevant
question
guilt
starkly
illustrates
significant
difference
sentencing
procedure
case
procedure
required
missouri
capital
murder
case
statute
authorizes
review
whether
procedure
employed
lawful
findings
made
clearly
erroneous
sentencing
discretion
abused
cases
concern
application
double
jeopardy
clause
sentencing
add
significantly
state
argument
chaffin
relies
primarily
upon
pearce
see
stroud
fact
jury
may
thus
mitigate
punishment
imprisonment
life
render
conviction
less
one
first
degree
murder
stroud
jury
required
find
facts
addition
necessary
conviction
murder
order
sentence
death
difrancesco
relies
upon
history
sentencing
practices
pertinent
rulings
considerations
double
jeopardy
policy
history
sentencing
practices
little
assistance
missouri
case
since
sentencing
procedures
capital
cases
instituted
decision
furman
unique
see
considerations
double
jeopardy
policy
favor
petitioner
case
rather
state
missouri
therefore
rely
upon
difrancesco
discussion
prior
cases
discussion
relies
chiefly
upon
pearce
see
sentencing
parole
release
decisions
country
largely
left
unfettered
discretion
officials
involved
legislatures
traditionally
set
high
maximum
penalties
within
judges
must
choose
specific
sentences
generally
provided
little
guidance
exercise
choice
although
purposes
sentencing
often
defined
including
deterrence
retribution
incapacitation
rehabilitation
community
condemnation
maintain
respect
law
legislatures
silent
regarding
purposes
primary
conflicts
among
purposes
resolved
example
federal
law
currently
requires
merely
determining
sentence
consider
opinion
ends
justice
best
interest
public
effect
sentencing
policymaking
traditionally
delegated
multitude
independent
judges
exercised
context
individual
cases
attempt
separate
policymaking
individual
sentencing
determinations
normally
type
presentence
investigation
available
attempts
provide
informational
basis
intelligent
individualized
sentencing
decision
yet
factors
considered
circumstances
weighted
decisions
left
solely
unfettered
discretion
individual
decisionmakers
hoffman
stover
reform
determination
prison
terms
equity
determinacy
parole
release
function
hofstra
rev
footnotes
omitted
conclusion
double
jeopardy
clause
issue
occasion
address
petitioner
claims
sixth
eighth
fourteenth
amendments
justice
powell
chief
justice
justice
white
justice
rehnquist
join
dissenting
case
concerns
force
double
jeopardy
clause
defendant
convicted
crime
sentenced
succeeded
conviction
reversed
holds
jury
decision
petitioner
first
trial
sentence
life
imprisonment
precludes
missouri
asking
jury
petitioner
second
trial
sentence
death
consider
opinion
irreconcilable
principle
precedents
law
double
jeopardy
clause
apply
sentencing
decisions
retrial
force
applies
redeterminations
guilt
innocence
since
stroud
settled
defendant
whose
conviction
reversed
may
receive
severe
sentence
upon
retrial
received
first
trial
followed
principle
north
carolina
pearce
held
corollary
power
retry
defendant
power
upon
defendant
reconviction
impose
whatever
sentence
may
legally
authorized
whether
greater
sentence
imposed
first
conviction
contrast
question
whether
defendant
retried
murder
jury
first
trial
found
guilty
murder
regarded
jury
verdict
implicit
acquittal
charge
first
degree
murder
held
double
jeopardy
clause
therefore
barred
retrial
charge
green
although
tension
green
pearce
opinions
holdings
inconsistent
become
landmarks
law
double
jeopardy
clause
cited
opinion
time
time
declined
reexamine
pearce
indeed
rationale
reaffirmed
recent
cases
difrancesco
chaffin
stynchcombe
earlier
term
stated
without
qualification
difference
result
reached
green
pearce
explained
grounds
imposition
sentence
operate
implied
acquittal
greater
sentence
difrancesco
supra
compare
ante
imposition
particular
sentence
usually
regarded
acquittal
severe
sentence
emphasis
added
today
applies
green
principle
implicit
acquittal
sentencing
despite
pearce
unqualified
statement
difrancesco
ii
justifies
applying
principle
sentencing
case
ground
missouri
death
penalty
statute
establishes
certain
procedures
sentencing
phase
capital
murder
trial
view
procedures
give
sentencing
phase
hallmarks
trial
guilt
innocence
ante
require
jury
decide
whether
state
proved
defendant
deserves
penalty
death
ante
decision
first
trial
impose
life
imprisonment
reasons
reflects
decision
state
failed
prove
defendant
deserves
capital
punishment
according
decision
implies
acquittal
harsher
sentence
characterized
jury
decision
life
imprisonment
acquittal
death
sentence
recites
classic
double
jeopardy
rationale
applicable
retrying
issue
guilt
innocence
green
supra
applies
reconsideration
appropriate
sentence
one
whose
guilt
unquestioned
ante
without
documentation
record
expense
ordeal
anxiety
resentencing
capital
murder
case
great
accompany
redetermination
guilt
innocence
ante
also
missouri
second
attempt
obtain
death
sentence
might
lead
erroneously
imposed
death
sentence
ante
therefore
concludes
double
jeopardy
clause
bars
missouri
seeking
death
penalty
petitioner
first
time
held
double
jeopardy
clause
applies
equally
sentencing
determinations
guilt
innocence
heretofore
thought
fundamental
difference
two
stroud
supra
north
carolina
pearce
supra
chaffin
stynchcombe
supra
difrancesco
supra
adhere
precedents
think
control
case
underlying
question
guilt
innocence
objective
truth
defendant
fact
commit
acts
constituting
crime
charged
time
accused
first
suspected
time
decision
guilt
innocence
made
criminal
justice
system
designed
enable
trier
fact
discover
truth
according
law
triers
fact
err
innocent
person
pronounced
guilty
contrast
law
provides
limited
standards
assessing
validity
sentencing
decision
sentencer
function
discover
fact
mete
deserts
sees
absent
mandatory
sentence
objective
measure
sentencer
decision
deemed
correct
erroneous
duly
made
within
authority
conferred
legislature
light
difference
nature
decisions
question
case
frame
whether
procedures
sentencing
decision
made
similar
procedures
decision
guilt
innocence
made
rather
question
whether
reasons
considering
acquittal
guilt
innocence
absolutely
final
apply
equally
sentencing
decision
imposing
less
severe
sentence
authorized
law
thought
pertinence
question
clear
answer
consistently
given
past
escaped
earlier
term
difrancesco
stated
fundamental
distinctions
sentence
acquittal
fail
recognize
ignore
particular
significance
acquittal
reasons
considering
acquittal
guilt
innocence
absolutely
final
apply
equally
sentencing
decision
less
severe
sentence
authorized
law
retrial
defendant
found
innocent
enhanc
es
possibility
even
though
innocent
may
found
guilty
green
chaffin
stynchcombe
held
possibility
higher
sentence
recognized
accepted
pearce
legitimate
concomitant
retrial
process
possibility
higher
sentence
acceptable
double
jeopardy
clause
whereas
possibility
error
guilt
innocence
second
jury
sentencing
decision
correct
first
jury
similarly
defendant
found
innocent
forced
second
time
ordeal
trial
defendant
found
guilty
must
bear
ordeal
sentenced
ordeal
serving
sentence
sum
find
wholly
unpersuasive
justification
applying
principle
sentencing
purport
justify
conclusion
argument
facing
death
sentence
second
time
ordeal
legal
sense
facing
sentence
second
time
death
sentence
course
unlike
punishment
reason
read
eighth
amendment
due
process
clause
fourteenth
amendment
require
prescribe
unique
procedural
safeguards
protect
capricious
discriminatory
impositions
death
sentence
furman
georgia
gregg
georgia
joint
opinion
death
sentence
imposed
accord
strictures
eighth
amendment
fourteenth
amendment
lawful
sentence
missouri
provides
requisite
procedures
find
basis
double
jeopardy
clause
single
sentence
statutorily
authorized
otherwise
may
imposed
constitutionally
nonetheless
one
guilty
defendant
may
required
face
twice
petitioner
ordeal
upon
retrial
different
kind
defendants
chaffin
stroud
faced
possibility
death
sentence
upon
reconviction
chaffin
stynchcombe
supra
stroud
today
simply
disregards
principles
established
prior
cases
iii
course
explaining
double
jeopardy
clause
bar
retrial
reversal
trial
error
stated
corresponding
right
accused
given
fair
trial
societal
interest
punishing
one
whose
guilt
clear
obtained
trial
tateo
missouri
decided
death
appropriate
punishment
one
whose
guilt
murder
aggravating
circumstances
made
clear
special
procedures
justification
constitution
barring
missouri
exacting
punishment
unless
missouri
interest
conflicts
constitutionally
protected
interests
defendant
double
jeopardy
clause
protect
guilty
defendant
interest
avoiding
harsher
sentence
upon
retrial
even
death
sentence
therefore
dissent
pearce
stated
decision
green
applicability
present
problem
green
decision
based
upon
double
jeopardy
provision
guarantee
retrial
offense
defendant
acquitted
emphasis
original
view
procedures
distinguish
case
difrancesco
chaffin
stynchcombe
north
carolina
pearce
stroud
sentencing
decisions
made
pursuant
similar
procedures
one
questions
procedures
applicable
capital
cases
different
analytically
difference
immaterial
purposes
double
jeopardy
clause
see
infra
course
sentence
imposed
upon
one
commit
crime
erroneous
error
inheres
decision
guilt
innocence
sentencing
decision
also
sentence
may
called
erroneous
grossly
disproportionate
severity
crime
committed
event
sentence
cruel
unusual
violation
eighth
amendment
weems
trouble
concurring
judgment
even
agreed
procedures
missouri
death
penalty
statute
distinguish
case
pearce
chaffin
stroud
view
first
jury
decision
sentence
petitioner
life
imprisonment
rather
death
reveals
state
failed
prove
case
petitioner
deserved
capital
punishment
premise
concludes
principle
green
burks
bars
second
attempt
state
secure
death
sentence
missouri
statute
mo
rev
stat
case
state
prove
petitioner
committed
murder
circumstances
defined
aggravating
circumstances
warranted
imposition
death
penalty
trial
expressly
instructed
jury
choose
life
imprisonment
rather
death
even
found
beyond
reasonable
doubt
state
proved
existence
gravity
circumstances
see
ante
thus
jury
decision
life
imprisonment
rather
death
necessarily
mean
state
adduced
insufficient
evidence
sure
acquittal
question
guilt
innocence
necessarily
mean
state
adduced
insufficient
evidence
yet
acquittals
final
juries
instructed
question
guilt
innocence
told
ignore
state
evidence
jury
instructed
case
significantly
less
reason
assume
state
failed
prove
case
accordingly
less
reason
consider
second
attempt
obtain
death
penalty
unfair
second
bite
apple
burks
supra