gonzales
et
argued
december
decided
march
held
section
plain
language
sentence
subsection
shall
run
concurrently
term
imprisonment
emphasis
added
forbids
federal
district
direct
section
mandatory
year
firearms
sentence
run
concurrently
prison
term
whether
state
federal
read
naturally
section
word
expansive
meaning
limited
federal
sentences
must
interpreted
referring
term
imprisonment
including
imposed
state
courts
alvarez
sanchez
unlike
tenth
circuit
sees
nothing
remarkable
much
less
ambiguous
congress
decision
drafting
toprohibit
concurrent
sentences
instead
simply
mandating
consecutive
ones
moreover
given
straightforward
statutory
command
reason
resort
legislative
history
connecticut
nat
bank
germain
indeed
legislative
history
excerpt
relied
upon
tenth
circuit
muddies
waters
contrary
interpretation
prohibition
applies
section
mandatory
firearms
sentence
limit
district
normal
authority
order
federal
sentences
run
concurrently
consecutively
state
federal
prison
terms
pp
vacated
remanded
delivered
opinion
rehnquist
scalia
kennedy
souter
thomas
ginsburg
joined
stevens
filed
dissenting
opinion
breyer
joined
breyer
filed
dissenting
opinion
stevens
joined
notice
opinion
subject
formal
revision
publication
preliminary
print
reports
readers
requested
notify
reporter
decisions
wash
ington
typographical
formal
errors
order
corrections
may
made
preliminary
print
goes
press
petitioner
miguel
gonzales
orlenis
hernandez
diaz
mario
perez
writ
certiorari
appeals
tenth
circuit
march
justice
delivered
opinion
asked
decide
whether
federal
may
direct
prison
sentence
run
concurrently
state
imposed
sentence
even
though
provides
sentence
imposed
statute
shall
run
concurrently
term
imprisonment
hold
may
respondents
arrested
drug
sting
operation
two
pulled
guns
undercover
police
officers
three
convicted
new
mexico
courts
charges
arising
hold
state
courts
sentenced
prison
terms
ranging
years
began
serve
state
sentences
respondents
convicted
federal
committing
various
drug
offenses
connected
sting
operation
conspiring
violation
also
convicted
using
firearms
relation
drug
trafficking
crimes
violation
respondents
received
sentences
ranging
months
prison
months
reflected
mandatory
sentence
required
firearms
convictions
pursuant
district
ordered
portion
respondents
federal
sentences
attributable
drug
convictions
run
concurrently
state
sentences
remaining
months
due
firearms
offenses
run
consecutively
appeals
tenth
circuit
vacated
respondents
sentences
firearms
violations
ground
sentences
run
concurrently
state
prison
terms
also
vacated
respondents
substantive
drug
convictions
dealt
various
sentencing
issues
us
although
appeals
recognized
circuits
uniformly
held
plain
language
prohibits
sentences
imposed
statute
running
concurrently
state
sentences
nevertheless
thought
literal
reading
statutory
language
produce
absurd
result
feeling
obliged
venture
thicket
legislative
history
citations
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
found
line
senate
committee
report
indicating
mandatory
sentence
revised
subsection
served
prior
start
sentence
underlying
offense
ibid
quoting
pp
hereinafter
emphasis
deleted
statement
applied
literally
respondents
serve
first
state
sentences
year
federal
firearm
sentences
finally
sentences
narcotics
convictions
even
though
narcotics
sentences
normally
run
concurrently
state
sentences
since
arose
criminal
activity
avoid
irrational
result
held
mandatory
five
year
sentence
may
run
concurrently
previously
imposed
state
sentence
defendant
already
begun
serve
granted
certiorari
reverse
analysis
begins
always
statutory
text
section
provides
whoever
relation
drug
trafficking
crime
may
prosecuted
uses
carries
firearm
shall
addition
punishment
provided
crime
sentenced
imprisonment
five
years
notwithstanding
provision
law
shall
place
probation
suspend
sentence
person
convicted
violation
subsection
shall
term
imprisonment
imposed
subsection
run
concurrently
term
imprisonment
including
imposed
drug
trafficking
crime
firearm
used
carried
emphasis
added
dissenting
opinion
justice
stevens
suggests
word
used
first
sentence
unquestionably
meaning
federal
post
first
sentence
however
congress
explicitly
limited
scope
phrase
crime
violence
drug
trafficking
crime
defendant
may
prosecuted
given
congress
expressly
limited
phrase
crime
federal
crimes
find
significant
similar
restriction
modifies
phrase
term
imprisonment
appears
two
sentences
later
issue
case
see
russello
congress
includes
particular
language
one
section
statute
omits
another
section
act
generally
presumed
congress
acts
intentionally
purposely
disparate
inclusion
exclusion
appeals
also
found
ambiguity
congress
decision
drafting
prohibit
concur
rent
sentences
instead
simply
mandating
consecutive
sentences
unlike
lower
however
see
nothing
remarkable
much
less
ambiguous
congress
choice
words
consecutive
concurrent
sentences
exact
opposites
congress
implicitly
required
one
prohibited
ambiguity
event
beside
point
phraseology
bearing
whether
congress
meant
sentences
run
consecutively
federal
terms
imprisonment
given
straightforward
statutory
command
reason
resort
legislative
history
connecticut
nat
bank
germain
indeed
far
clarifying
statute
legislative
history
muddies
waters
excerpt
senate
report
accompanying
amendment
relied
upon
appeals
reads
committee
intends
mandatory
sentence
revised
subsection
served
prior
start
sentence
underlying
offense
appeals
troubled
rule
might
lead
irrational
results
normally
district
authority
decide
whether
federal
prison
terms
run
concurrently
consecutively
prison
sentences
vesting
power
district
run
prison
terms
either
concurrently
consecutively
sentencing
commission
guidelines
manual
ussg
guiding
discretion
prison
terms
respondents
federal
sentences
begin
terms
completed
however
district
effectively
stripped
statutory
power
decide
whether
sentences
underlying
narcotics
offenses
run
concurrently
respondents
state
terms
imprisonment
observed
rule
lead
dramatically
higher
sentences
particularly
respondents
case
perez
example
already
serving
year
state
prison
term
role
hold
normally
year
federal
sentence
narcotics
possession
run
concurrently
state
term
ussg
year
firearm
sentence
follow
total
years
prison
must
serve
federal
narcotics
sentence
firearms
sentence
however
face
total
years
prison
seeking
avoid
conflict
reinterpreted
light
legislative
history
appeals
held
prohibited
running
federal
terms
imprisonment
concurrently
ibid
also
reasoned
narrow
reading
necessary
way
later
sentencing
federal
cause
mandatory
year
sentence
served
state
sentence
already
served
ibid
see
three
flaws
reasoning
first
statutory
texts
unvarnished
legislative
history
entirely
consistent
section
specifies
must
run
firearms
sentence
concurrently
prison
terms
leaves
plenty
room
run
sentences
whether
state
federal
offenses
concurrently
one
another
pursuant
ussg
statutes
clash
engraft
onto
requirement
found
single
sentence
buried
legislative
history
firearms
sentence
must
run
first
therefore
follow
text
rather
legislative
history
disregarding
suggestion
district
must
specify
sentence
firearms
conviction
served
sentences
give
full
meaning
texts
see
wiltberger
wheat
marshall
ambiguity
words
room
construction
case
must
strong
one
indeed
justify
departing
plain
meaning
words
search
intention
words
suggest
second
even
ignored
plain
language
required
courts
list
order
defendant
must
serve
sentences
different
convictions
thereby
create
rule
superfluous
light
statute
instructs
bureau
prisons
treat
multiple
terms
imprisonment
whether
imposed
concurrently
consecutively
administrative
purposes
single
aggregate
term
imprisonment
ibid
practical
matter
makes
difference
whether
specifies
sequence
portion
aggregate
sentence
must
served
impose
sentencing
courts
new
duties
view
statutory
commands
effectively
meaningless
third
appeals
solution
allow
prison
terms
run
concurrently
state
sentences
eliminate
anomaly
arises
firearms
sentence
must
run
first
although
clear
prison
term
possibly
run
earlier
imposed
state
prison
term
holds
true
prisoner
already
serving
federal
sentence
see
providing
federal
prison
term
commences
defendant
received
custody
voluntarily
arrives
begin
serving
sentence
impossible
start
sentence
prison
term
prisoner
already
serving
whether
imposed
state
federal
limiting
phrase
term
imprisonment
state
sentences
get
rid
problem
thus
think
appeals
invented
problem
devised
wrong
solution
justice
breyer
questions
dissent
whether
congress
wanted
impose
sentence
defendant
already
serving
prison
term
pursuant
virtually
identical
state
sentencing
enhancement
statute
post
federal
double
jeopardy
reasons
sentence
person
twoconsecutive
federal
prison
terms
single
violation
federal
criminal
statute
congress
impose
two
consecutive
federal
sentences
dissent
argues
unlikely
congress
wanted
stack
sentence
onto
prison
term
virtually
identical
state
firearms
enhancement
post
already
observed
however
straightforward
language
leaves
room
speculate
congressional
intent
see
supra
statute
speaks
term
imprisonment
without
limitation
intimation
congress
meant
sentences
run
consecutively
certain
types
prison
terms
district
courts
discretion
sentencing
guidelines
course
cases
related
offenses
prosecuted
multiple
proceedings
establish
sentences
eye
toward
punishments
approximate
total
penalty
imposed
sentences
different
offenses
imposed
time
witte
slip
discussing
ussg
see
post
breyer
dissenting
congress
enacted
consecutive
sentencing
provision
however
cabined
sentencing
discretion
district
courts
single
circumstance
defendant
violates
sentencing
enhancement
statute
must
run
consecutively
prison
terms
given
clear
legislative
directive
courts
carve
statutory
exceptions
based
judicial
perceptions
good
sentencing
policy
language
reinforces
conclusion
congress
amended
sentencing
enhancement
apply
regardless
whether
underlying
felony
statute
provides
enhanced
punishment
committed
use
deadly
dangerous
weapon
device
comprehensive
crimecontrol
act
pub
stat
congress
thus
repudiated
result
reached
busic
held
prosecution
enhanced
sentencing
simply
permissible
predicate
felony
statute
contains
enhancement
provision
irrespective
whether
government
actually
sought
enhancement
predicate
statute
see
also
simpson
holding
federal
may
impose
sentences
weapon
enhancement
armed
bank
robbery
statute
based
single
criminal
transaction
holdings
cases
based
conclusion
unamended
text
left
us
little
guess
congress
meant
mesh
statute
sentencing
enhancement
provisions
scattered
throughout
federal
criminal
code
simpson
supra
busic
supra
amendment
however
eliminated
ambiguities
point
congress
made
clear
desire
run
enhancements
consecutively
prison
terms
regardless
whether
imposed
firearms
enhancement
statutes
similar
therefore
agree
justice
breyer
contention
interpretation
distinguishes
subject
undischarged
state
subject
undischarged
federal
sentences
post
sorts
defendants
face
sentences
convictions
run
concurrently
consecutively
according
normal
sentencing
principles
plus
enhancement
short
light
amendment
think
congress
foreclosed
dissent
argument
covers
federal
sentences
finally
pause
comment
justice
today
decision
might
affect
cases
state
trial
follows
federal
trial
state
judge
imposes
concurrent
sentence
might
viewed
inconsistent
post
course
sequence
respondents
sentenced
case
occasion
decide
whether
later
sentencing
state
bound
order
sentence
run
consecutively
term
imprisonment
see
ibid
us
today
authority
later
sentencing
federal
impose
consecutive
sentence
hesitant
reach
beyond
facts
case
decide
question
squarely
presented
review
sum
hold
plain
language
forbids
federal
district
direct
term
imprisonment
statute
run
concurrently
term
imprisonment
whether
state
federal
statute
however
limit
authority
order
federal
sentences
run
concurrently
consecutively
prison
terms
state
federal
judgment
appeals
vacated
case
remanded
proceedings
consistent
opinion
ordered
petitioner
miguel
gonzales
orlenis
hernandez
diaz
mario
perez
writ
certiorari
appeals
tenth
circuit
march
justice
stevens
justice
breyer
joins
cases
arose
criminal
enterprise
violated
new
mexico
law
federal
law
gave
rise
state
federal
prosecutions
raise
narrow
important
question
concerning
scope
prohibition
concurrent
sentences
contained
government
reads
provision
prohibits
sentence
running
concurrently
state
sentence
already
imposed
permits
concurrent
state
federal
sentences
federal
prosecution
precedes
state
prosecution
thus
length
total
term
imprisonment
including
state
sentence
federal
sentence
determined
part
happenstance
case
tried
first
read
literally
however
text
avoid
anomalous
result
text
broadly
prohibits
sentence
running
concurrently
term
imprisonment
regardless
whether
term
imposed
afterthe
federal
sentence
statute
read
literally
require
state
judges
make
state
term
imprisonment
run
consecutively
sentence
alternatively
state
trial
follows
federal
trial
state
judge
imposes
concurrent
sentence
read
applicability
state
sentences
literal
text
require
federal
authorities
suspend
sentence
state
sentence
served
relying
heavily
pure
textual
analysis
opinion
appear
dictate
result
like
government
however
think
statute
reasonably
interpreted
containing
command
state
sentencing
judges
requiring
suspension
federal
sentences
concurrent
state
sentences
later
imposed
thus
common
sense
requires
us
reject
purely
literal
reading
text
question
arises
better
two
plausible
nonliteral
readings
term
term
imprisonment
narrowed
reading
cover
term
imprisonment
already
imposed
government
argues
federal
term
imprisonment
respondent
contends
three
reasons
think
likely
congress
intended
latter
interpretation
first
borders
irrational
assume
congress
actually
intend
severity
defendant
punishment
case
kind
turn
happenstance
whether
state
federal
prosecution
concluded
first
defendant
reading
statute
avoids
anomaly
second
amended
prohibit
concurrent
sentences
see
title
ii
omnibus
crime
control
act
stat
prohibition
applied
federal
sentence
imposed
underlying
offense
congress
amended
statute
broaden
prohibition
beyond
underlying
offense
said
nothing
state
sentences
congress
intended
amendment
apply
state
well
federal
sentences
think
mention
important
change
legislative
history
furthermore
amendment
part
general
revision
sentencing
laws
sought
achieve
uniformity
predictability
federal
sentencing
see
sentencing
reform
act
stat
et
seq
anomaly
government
reading
authorizes
inconsistent
basic
uniformity
theme
legislation
finally
context
relevant
language
appears
concerned
entirely
federal
sentencing
indeed
word
used
earlier
section
unquestionably
meaning
federal
given
government
recognition
fact
completely
literal
reading
untenable
fact
offers
nothing
dictionary
definition
word
support
result
think
wiser
course
interpret
word
prohibition
concurrent
sentences
meaning
word
first
used
statute
accordingly
respectfully
dissent
footnotes
reply
brief
tr
oral
arg
case
construction
legislative
language
makes
sweeping
relatively
unorthodox
change
made
think
judges
well
detectives
may
take
consideration
fact
watchdog
bark
night
harrison
ppg
industries
rehnquist
dissenting
first
sentence
word
expressly
confined
federal
prosecutions
word
used
second
time
describe
provision
law
quite
obvious
embraces
provisions
federal
law
even
though
limitation
implicit
rather
explicit
nowhere
explicit
reference
state
law
state
sentences