fox
film
corporation
muller
argued
decided
december
charles
hughes
washington
percy
heiliger
new
york
city
james
shearer
minneapolis
petitioner
abram
myers
washington
respondent
justice
sutherland
delivered
opinion
action
brought
minnesota
state
first
instance
film
corporation
muller
recover
damages
alleged
breach
two
contracts
muller
licensed
exhibit
certain
moving
picture
films
belonging
corporation
muller
answered
setting
invalidity
contracts
sherman
act
usca
note
agreed
contracts
substantially
one
involved
paramount
famous
lasky
corporation
et
al
affirmed
petitioner
one
defendants
action
clause
paragraph
contracts
sued
upon
held
case
invalid
view
disposition
make
writ
necessary
set
forth
terms
arbitration
clause
provisions
contract
first
instance
held
contract
sued
upon
violated
sherman
act
dismissed
action
supplemental
opinion
put
decision
upon
grounds
first
arbitration
plan
connected
remainder
contract
entire
contract
tainted
second
tract
violates
sherman
law
state
affirmed
granted
certiorari
case
called
argument
appeared
final
judgment
entered
writ
dismissed
improvidently
granted
case
remanded
state
judgment
made
final
affirmed
state
authority
previous
opinion
allowed
present
writ
opinion
state
statement
case
said
page
question
presented
appeal
whether
arbitration
clause
severable
contract
leaving
remainder
contract
enforceable
severable
permeating
tainting
whole
contract
illegality
making
void
proceeded
refer
discuss
number
decisions
state
federal
courts
took
view
arbitration
clause
severable
others
severable
remainder
contract
reviewing
opinion
decree
federal
district
paramount
case
lower
reached
conclusion
holding
federal
entire
contract
illegal
upon
view
upon
conceived
weight
authority
held
arbitration
plan
inseparable
provisions
contract
whether
conclusion
right
wrong
need
determine
enough
least
without
fair
support
respondent
contends
question
severability
alone
decided
federal
question
determined
lower
contention
petitioner
challenges
asserts
federal
question
involved
decided
attempt
settle
pute
assuming
present
purposes
petitioner
view
correct
one
case
controlled
settled
rule
judgment
state
rests
upon
two
grounds
one
federal
nonfederal
character
jurisdiction
fails
nonfederal
ground
independent
federal
ground
adequate
support
judgment
rule
become
firmly
fixed
least
early
klinger
state
missouri
wall
reiterated
long
line
cases
since
time
enough
cite
addition
klinger
case
following
enterprise
irr
dist
farmers
mut
canal
petrie
nampa
irr
mccoy
shaw
eustis
bolles
whether
provisions
contract
nonseverable
one
held
invalid
others
must
fall
clearly
question
general
federal
law
invalidity
arbitration
clause
present
contracts
embody
conceded
held
invalid
federal
district
paramount
case
judgment
affirmed
question
therefore
foreclosed
subject
controversy
state
courts
situation
primary
question
determined
whether
concededly
invalid
clause
separable
provisions
contract
ruling
state
sufficient
conclude
case
without
regard
determination
fact
made
respect
federal
question
follows
nonfederal
ground
adequate
sustain
judgment
rule
announced
enterprise
irr
dist
farmers
mut
canal
co
supra
cases
effect
jurisdiction
attaches
nonfederal
ground
interwoven
independent
matter
apply
construction
put
upon
contracts
constitute
preliminary
step
simply
effect
bringing
forward
determination
federal
question
decision
automatically
took
federal
question
case
otherwise
nonfederal
question
respect
construction
contracts
federal
question
respect
validity
act
clearly
independent
one
another
see
allen
southern
pacific
railroad
case
effect
disposed
federal
question
said
involved
reached
chouteau
gibson
chapman
goodnow
decision
question
became
unnecessary
whether
decided
want
jurisdiction
clear
writ
dismissed
want
jurisdiction
chief
justice
took
part
consideration
decision
case