ins
delgado
argued
january
decided
april
acting
pursuant
warrants
issued
showing
probable
cause
numerous
unidentified
illegal
aliens
employed
garment
factory
immigration
naturalization
service
ins
conducted
two
factory
surveys
work
force
search
illegal
aliens
third
factory
survey
conducted
employer
consent
another
garment
factory
survey
lasted
one
two
hours
ins
agents
positioned
near
factory
exits
agents
moved
systematically
factory
approaching
employees
identifying
asking
employees
one
three
questions
relating
citizenship
employee
gave
credible
reply
citizen
produced
immigration
papers
agent
moved
another
employee
survey
employees
continued
work
free
walk
around
within
factory
respondent
employees
citizens
permanent
resident
aliens
questioned
surveys
union
filed
actions
consolidated
federal
district
alleging
factory
surveys
violated
fourth
amendment
rights
seeking
declaratory
injunctive
relief
district
granted
summary
judgment
ins
appeals
reversed
holding
surveys
constituted
seizure
entire
work
forces
ins
question
individual
employee
unless
agents
reasonable
suspicion
employee
illegal
alien
held
factory
surveys
result
seizure
entire
work
forces
individual
questioning
respondent
employees
ins
agents
concerning
citizenship
amount
detention
seizure
fourth
amendment
pp
interrogation
relating
one
identity
request
identification
police
constitute
fourth
amendment
seizure
unless
circumstances
encounter
intimidating
demonstrate
reasonable
person
believed
free
leave
responded
questioning
result
detention
fourth
amendment
pp
entire
work
forces
factories
seized
duration
surveys
even
though
ins
agents
placed
near
exits
factory
sites
record
indicates
agents
conduct
consisted
simply
questioning
employees
arresting
probable
cause
believe
unlawfully
present
factory
conduct
given
respondents
citizens
aliens
lawfully
present
factories
reason
believe
detained
gave
truthful
answers
questions
put
simply
refused
answer
mere
questioning
constitute
seizure
occurred
inside
factory
seizure
occurred
exits
pp
since
seizure
work
forces
virtue
method
conducting
surveys
issue
individual
questioning
presented
one
respondent
employees
fact
seized
detained
deposition
testimony
showed
none
may
litigate
happened
description
encounters
ins
agents
showed
encounters
classic
consensual
encounters
rather
fourth
amendment
seizures
pp
rehnquist
delivered
opinion
burger
white
blackmun
stevens
joined
stevens
filed
concurring
opinion
post
powell
filed
opinion
concurring
result
post
brennan
filed
opinion
concurring
part
dissenting
part
marshall
joined
post
deputy
solicitor
general
frey
argued
cause
petitioners
briefs
solicitor
general
lee
assistant
attorney
general
trott
elliott
schulder
patty
merkamp
stemler
henry
fenton
argued
cause
respondents
brief
gordon
hubel
max
zimny
briefs
amici
curiae
urging
affirmance
filed
american
civil
liberties
union
david
brodsky
burt
neuborne
charles
sims
mexican
american
legal
defense
education
fund
et
al
michael
kantor
alan
diamond
justice
rehnquist
delivered
opinion
course
enforcing
immigration
laws
petitioner
immigration
naturalization
service
ins
enters
employers
worksites
determine
whether
illegal
aliens
may
present
employees
appeals
ninth
circuit
held
factory
surveys
involved
case
amounted
seizure
entire
work
forces
held
ins
question
individual
employees
surveys
unless
agents
reasonable
suspicion
employee
questioned
illegal
alien
international
ladies
garment
workers
union
sureck
conclude
factory
surveys
result
seizure
entire
work
forces
individual
questioning
respondents
case
ins
agents
concerning
citizenship
amount
detention
seizure
fourth
amendment
accordingly
reverse
judgment
appeals
acting
pursuant
two
warrants
january
september
ins
conducted
survey
work
force
southern
california
davis
pleating
davis
pleating
search
illegal
aliens
warrants
issued
showing
probable
cause
ins
numerous
illegal
aliens
employed
davis
pleating
although
neither
search
warrants
identified
particular
illegal
aliens
name
third
factory
survey
conducted
employer
consent
october
pleat
another
garment
factory
beginning
surveys
several
agents
positioned
near
buildings
exits
agents
dispersed
throughout
factory
question
employees
work
stations
agents
displayed
badges
carried
armed
although
point
surveys
weapon
ever
drawn
moving
systematically
factory
agents
approached
employees
identifying
asked
one
three
questions
relating
citizenship
employee
gave
credible
reply
citizen
questioning
ended
agent
moved
another
employee
employee
gave
unsatisfactory
response
admitted
alien
employee
asked
produce
immigration
papers
survey
employees
continued
work
free
walk
around
within
factory
respondents
four
employees
questioned
one
three
surveys
respondents
union
representative
international
ladies
garment
workers
union
filed
two
actions
later
consolidated
district
central
district
california
challenging
constitutionality
ins
factory
surveys
seeking
declaratory
injunctive
relief
respondents
argued
factory
surveys
violated
fourth
amendment
right
free
unreasonable
searches
seizures
equal
protection
component
due
process
clause
fifth
amendment
district
denied
class
certification
dismissed
union
action
lack
standing
app
pet
cert
series
partial
summary
judgment
district
ruled
respondents
reasonable
expectation
privacy
conferred
standing
challenge
entry
ins
pursuant
warrant
owner
consent
final
ruling
district
addressed
respondents
request
injunctive
relief
directed
preventing
ins
questioning
personally
future
surveys
district
material
facts
dispute
found
four
respondents
asked
question
questions
ins
agent
one
factory
surveys
reasoning
decision
terry
ohio
law
enforcement
officers
may
ask
questions
anyone
district
ruled
none
respondents
detained
fourth
amendment
factory
surveys
either
questioned
otherwise
app
pet
cert
accordingly
granted
summary
judgment
favor
ins
appeals
reversed
applying
standard
first
enunciated
member
mendenhall
opinion
stewart
appeals
concluded
entire
work
forces
seized
duration
survey
lasted
one
two
hours
stationing
agents
doors
buildings
meant
reasonable
worker
believed
free
leave
quoting
anderson
although
appeals
conceded
ins
statutory
authority
question
alien
person
believed
alien
right
remain
see
stat
held
fourth
amendment
individual
employees
questioned
basis
reasonable
suspicion
particular
employee
questioned
alien
illegally
country
reasonable
suspicion
probable
cause
believe
number
illegal
aliens
working
particular
factory
site
insufficient
justify
questioning
individual
employee
consequently
also
held
individual
questioning
respondents
violated
fourth
amendment
reasonable
suspicion
probable
cause
granted
certiorari
review
decision
appeals
serious
implications
enforcement
immigration
laws
presents
conflict
decision
reached
third
circuit
babula
ins
fourth
amendment
proscribe
contact
police
citizens
designed
prevent
arbitrary
oppressive
interference
enforcement
officials
privacy
personal
security
individuals
given
diversity
encounters
police
officers
citizens
however
cautious
defining
limits
imposed
fourth
amendment
encounters
police
citizens
noted
elsewhere
obviously
personal
intercourse
policemen
citizens
involves
seizures
persons
officer
means
physical
force
show
authority
restrained
liberty
citizen
may
conclude
seizure
occurred
terry
ohio
supra
applying
test
relatively
straightforward
situation
resembling
traditional
arrest
see
dunaway
new
york
protection
unreasonable
seizures
also
extends
seizures
involve
brief
detention
short
traditional
arrest
evolved
cases
determination
initially
consensual
encounter
police
officer
citizen
transformed
seizure
detention
within
meaning
fourth
amendment
view
circumstances
surrounding
incident
reasonable
person
believed
free
leave
mendenhall
supra
omitted
see
florida
royer
plurality
opinion
although
yet
rule
directly
whether
mere
questioning
individual
police
official
without
amount
seizure
fourth
amendment
recent
decision
royer
supra
plainly
implies
interrogation
relating
one
identity
request
identification
police
constitute
fourth
amendment
seizure
royer
drug
enforcement
administration
agents
found
respondent
matched
drug
courier
profile
agents
approached
defendant
asked
airplane
ticket
driver
license
agents
examined
majority
believed
request
examination
documents
permissible
plurality
opinion
see
opinion
rehnquist
contrast
much
different
situation
prevailed
brown
texas
two
policemen
physically
detained
defendant
determine
identity
defendant
refused
officers
request
identify
held
absent
reasonable
suspicion
misconduct
detention
defendant
determine
identity
violated
defendant
fourth
amendment
right
free
unreasonable
seizure
apparent
royer
brown
police
questioning
unlikely
result
fourth
amendment
violation
citizens
respond
police
request
fact
people
without
told
free
respond
hardly
eliminates
consensual
nature
response
cf
schneckloth
bustamonte
unless
circumstances
encounter
intimidating
demonstrate
reasonable
person
believed
free
leave
responded
one
say
questioning
resulted
detention
fourth
amendment
person
refuses
answer
police
take
additional
steps
taken
brown
obtain
answer
fourth
amendment
imposes
minimal
level
objective
justification
validate
detention
seizure
mendenhall
see
terry
ohio
appeals
held
manner
factory
surveys
conducted
case
constituted
seizure
workforce
fourth
amendment
element
surprise
systematic
questioning
individual
workers
several
ins
agents
contributed
holding
pivotal
factor
decision
stationing
ins
agents
near
exits
factory
buildings
according
appeals
stationing
agents
near
doors
meant
departures
contemplated
thus
workers
free
leave
ibid
support
decision
respondents
argue
ins
created
intimidating
psychological
environment
intruded
unexpectedly
workplace
show
officers
besides
stationing
agents
near
exits
respondents
add
length
survey
failure
inform
workers
free
leave
resulted
fourth
amendment
seizure
entire
work
force
reject
claim
entire
work
forces
two
factories
seized
duration
surveys
ins
placed
agents
near
exits
factory
sites
ordinarily
people
work
freedom
move
meaningfully
restricted
actions
law
enforcement
officials
workers
voluntary
obligations
employers
record
indicates
surveys
initiated
employees
ordinary
business
operating
machinery
performing
job
assignments
surveys
cause
disruption
including
efforts
workers
hide
record
also
indicates
workers
prevented
agents
moving
factories
respondents
argue
however
stationing
agents
near
factory
doors
showed
ins
intent
prevent
people
leaving
nothing
record
indicating
agents
doors
actually
obvious
purpose
agents
presence
factory
doors
insure
persons
factories
questioned
record
indicates
ins
agents
conduct
case
consisted
simply
questioning
employees
arresting
probable
cause
believe
unlawfully
present
factory
conduct
given
respondents
reason
believe
detained
gave
truthful
answers
questions
put
simply
refused
answer
mere
questioning
constitute
seizure
occurs
inside
factory
seizure
occurs
exits
similar
conclusion
holds
true
citizens
aliens
lawfully
present
inside
factory
buildings
surveys
presence
agents
exits
posed
reasonable
threat
detention
workers
walked
throughout
factories
job
assignments
likewise
mere
possibility
questioned
sought
leave
buildings
resulted
reasonable
apprehension
seized
detained
meaningful
way
since
workers
reasonable
fear
detained
upon
leaving
conclude
work
forces
whole
seized
appeals
also
held
detentive
questioning
individuals
conducted
ins
agents
articulate
objective
facts
providing
investigators
reasonable
suspicion
questioned
person
detained
alien
illegally
country
analysis
however
since
seizure
work
forces
virtue
method
conducting
factory
surveys
way
issue
individual
questioning
presented
one
named
respondents
fact
seized
detained
reviewing
deposition
testimony
respondents
conclude
none
questioning
respondent
ins
agents
seems
nothing
brief
encounter
none
three
davis
pleating
employees
questioned
january
survey
september
survey
davis
pleating
respondent
delgado
discussing
survey
another
employee
two
ins
agents
approached
asked
city
delgado
informed
came
mayaguez
puerto
rico
agent
made
innocuous
observation
partner
left
app
respondent
correa
experience
september
survey
similar
walking
one
part
factory
another
correa
stopped
ins
agent
asked
born
replied
huntington
park
california
agent
walked
away
correa
continued
business
respondent
labonte
third
davis
pleating
employee
tapped
shoulder
asked
spanish
papers
labonte
responded
papers
without
request
ins
agents
showed
papers
agents
left
finally
respondent
miramontes
sole
pleat
employee
involved
case
encountered
agent
en
route
office
worksite
questioned
concerning
citizenship
miramontes
replied
resident
alien
agent
request
produced
work
permit
agent
left
respondents
argue
manner
surveys
conducted
attendant
disruption
caused
surveys
created
psychological
environment
made
reasonably
afraid
free
leave
consequently
respondents
approached
ins
agents
questioned
concerning
citizenship
right
work
effectively
detained
fourth
amendment
since
reasonably
feared
refusing
answer
resulted
arrest
obvious
beginning
surveys
ins
agents
questioning
people
persons
respondents
simply
went
business
workplace
detained
way
nothing
occurred
question
put
persons
attempted
flee
evade
agents
may
eventually
detained
questioning
see
respondents
fact
detained
manner
respondents
questioned
given
obvious
purpose
hardly
result
reasonable
fear
respondents
free
continue
working
move
factory
respondents
may
litigate
happened
review
description
encounters
ins
agents
satisfies
us
encounters
classic
consensual
encounters
rather
fourth
amendment
seizures
see
florida
royer
mendenhall
accordingly
judgment
appeals
reversed
footnotes
respondents
herman
delgado
ramona
correa
francisca
labonte
worked
davis
pleating
marie
miramontes
fourth
respondent
employed
pleat
delgado
correa
citizens
labonte
miramontes
permanent
resident
aliens
district
never
ruled
directly
respondents
fifth
amendment
claim
apparently
reasoning
since
respondents
fourth
amendment
rights
violated
fifth
amendment
right
also
violated
appeals
also
never
ruled
respondents
fifth
amendment
claim
decline
appeals
ruled
district
abuse
discretion
denying
class
certification
light
disposition
respondents
fourth
amendment
claims
appeals
declined
resolve
union
appeal
district
determination
union
lacked
standing
raise
members
fourth
amendment
claims
although
issue
subject
substantial
discussion
oral
argument
ins
contest
respondents
standing
bring
case
allege
existence
ongoing
policy
violated
fourth
amendment
applied
workplace
future
cf
allee
medrano
part
argument
clearly
based
ins
detention
illegal
aliens
found
working
two
factories
respondents
however
premise
right
injunctive
relief
individual
encounters
ins
agents
factory
surveys
see
infra
contrary
respondents
assertion
also
makes
difference
case
encounters
took
place
inside
factory
location
usually
accessible
public
ins
officers
lawfully
present
pursuant
consent
warrant
people
area
ins
agents
questioning
thus
considerations
attending
contacts
police
citizens
public
places
apply
questions
presented
individual
respondents
deposition
respondent
miramontes
described
incident
occurred
october
factory
survey
pleat
ins
agent
stationed
exit
attempted
prevent
worker
presumably
illegal
alien
leaving
premises
survey
started
worker
walked
door
agent
tried
stop
worker
pushed
agent
aside
ran
away
app
ambiguous
isolated
incident
fails
provide
basis
conclude
respondents
shown
ins
policy
entitling
injunctive
relief
see
rizzo
goode
cf
allee
medrano
supra
hague
cio
respondents
delgado
labonte
left
building
ins
survey
delgado
load
truck
labonte
observe
ins
activities
outside
building
app
neither
stated
depositions
ins
agents
way
restrained
leaving
building
even
addressed
questions
upon
leaving
justice
stevens
concurring
trial
yet
held
case
district
entered
summary
judgment
respondents
appeals
reversing
remand
case
trial
rather
directed
district
enter
summary
judgment
respondents
permanent
injunction
petitioners
case
comes
us
therefore
must
construe
record
favorably
petitioners
resolve
issues
fact
favor
agree
record
insufficient
establish
genuine
issue
fact
question
whether
respondents
reasonably
believed
detained
meaningful
way
join
opinion
justice
powell
concurring
result
opinion
persuasive
find
question
whether
factory
surveys
conducted
case
resulted
fourth
amendment
seizures
close
one
question
turns
difficult
characterization
fact
law
whether
reasonable
person
respondents
position
believed
free
refuse
answer
questions
put
ins
officers
leave
factory
believe
need
decide
question
however
clear
seizure
may
taken
place
permissible
reasoning
decision
case
held
stopping
automobiles
brief
questioning
permanent
traffic
checkpoints
away
mexican
border
consistent
fourth
amendment
need
authorized
warrant
assumed
stops
constituted
seizures
within
meaning
fourth
amendment
see
upheld
reasonable
prior
cases
involving
apprehension
aliens
illegally
weighed
public
interest
practice
issue
fourth
amendment
interest
individual
see
noting
importance
routine
checkpoint
stops
controlling
flow
illegal
aliens
interior
country
found
government
substantial
interest
practice
hand
intrusion
individual
motorists
minimal
stops
brief
usually
involving
question
two
possibly
production
documents
moreover
public
regularized
law
enforcement
activities
vesting
limited
discretion
officers
field
weighing
considerations
held
stops
questioning
issue
well
referrals
slightly
longer
secondary
inspection
might
made
absence
individualized
suspicion
particular
car
contained
illegal
aliens
case
similar
government
interest
using
factory
surveys
great
greater
according
affidavit
ins
assistant
district
director
los
angeles
contained
record
case
surveys
account
illegal
aliens
identified
arrested
away
border
every
day
los
angeles
district
app
district
alone
illegal
aliens
arrested
course
factory
surveys
one
year
surveys
case
resulted
arrest
employees
factories
noted
dimensions
immigration
problem
country
supra
recent
estimates
number
illegal
aliens
country
range
million
although
consensus
appears
number
one
time
million
one
main
reasons
come
perhaps
main
reason
seek
employment
see
app
supra
select
committee
factory
surveys
strike
directly
cause
enabling
ins
relatively
agents
diminish
incentive
dangerous
passage
across
border
apprehend
large
numbers
come
clearly
government
interest
enforcement
technique
enormous
intrusion
fourth
amendment
interests
employees
hand
objective
intrusion
actually
less
cars
often
stopped
five
minutes
employees
continue
work
survey
progressed
diverted
briefly
answer
questions
display
registration
cards
true
initial
entry
plant
factory
survey
surprise
workers
obviously
authorized
character
operation
clear
purpose
seeking
illegal
aliens
systematic
public
nature
survey
serve
minimize
concern
fright
part
lawful
employees
moreover
employees
expectation
privacy
plant
setting
like
automobile
certainly
far
less
traditional
expectation
privacy
one
residence
therefore
reasons
upheld
checkpoint
stops
without
individualized
suspicion
find
factory
surveys
reasonable
case
presents
question
whether
warrant
required
entry
ins
officers
plants
majority
notes
ins
obtained
either
warrant
consent
factory
owners
entering
plants
conduct
surveys
solicitor
general
informs
us
figure
text
refers
country
whole
ins
estimates
internal
records
factory
surveys
accounted
approximately
illegal
aliens
apprehended
ins
nonborder
locations
brief
petitioners
course
first
survey
davis
pleating
illegal
aliens
arrested
work
force
approximately
second
survey
nine
months
later
resulted
arrest
illegal
aliens
employees
survey
pleat
resulted
arrest
illegal
aliens
approximately
employees
app
house
select
committee
population
legal
illegal
immigration
comm
print
hereinafter
select
committee
see
also
ins
suggested
number
illegal
aliens
might
high
million
despite
vast
expenditures
ins
agencies
prevent
illegal
immigration
apprehend
aliens
illegally
despite
laws
making
crime
law
irrationally
continues
permit
employers
hire
many
employers
actively
recruit
illegal
immigrant
labor
encouraging
government
tolerance
illegal
entry
see
select
committee
incongruity
immigration
statutes
calculated
increase
respect
rule
law
also
held
particularized
reason
necessary
refer
motorists
secondary
inspection
area
slightly
intrusive
seizure
similarly
hold
case
context
overall
survey
factory
particularized
suspicion
needed
justify
choice
employees
subjected
minimal
intrusion
questioning
dissent
claim
ins
agents
greater
discretion
decide
question
factory
surveys
traffic
checkpoints
post
neglects
virtually
unlimited
discretion
refer
cars
secondary
inspection
area
approved
dissent
also
suggests
warrant
requirement
factory
surveys
certain
unspecified
improvements
make
surveys
constitutional
post
note
declined
impose
warrant
requirement
location
traffic
checkpoints
respondents
argue
requirement
changes
duration
manner
surveys
address
warrant
question
fully
briefed
sides
justice
brennan
justice
marshall
joins
concurring
part
dissenting
part
part
ongoing
efforts
enforce
immigration
laws
immigration
naturalization
service
ins
conducts
surveys
workplaces
reason
believe
employ
large
numbers
undocumented
aliens
may
subject
deportation
case
presents
question
whether
ins
method
carrying
factory
surveys
violates
rights
affected
factory
workers
secure
unreasonable
seizures
one
person
guaranteed
fourth
amendment
answering
question
today
holds
first
ins
surveys
involved
result
seizure
entire
factory
work
force
complete
duration
surveys
ante
second
individual
questioning
respondents
ins
agents
concerning
citizenship
constitute
seizures
within
meaning
fourth
amendment
ante
although
generally
agree
first
conclusion
convinced
fair
application
prior
decisions
facts
case
compels
conclusion
respondents
unreasonably
seized
ins
agents
course
factory
surveys
first
blush
opinion
appears
unremarkable
striking
today
decision
studied
air
unreality
indeed
considerable
feat
legerdemain
able
arrive
conclusion
respondents
seized
success
sleight
hand
turns
proposition
interrogations
respondents
ins
merely
brief
consensual
encounters
ante
posed
threat
respondents
personal
security
freedom
record
however
tells
far
different
story
contrary
suggestion
see
ante
repeatedly
considered
whether
circumstances
questioning
individual
law
enforcement
officers
may
amount
seizure
within
meaning
fourth
amendment
see
terry
ohio
davis
mississippi
adams
williams
brown
texas
mendenhall
florida
royer
course
decisions
recognize
question
admit
simple
answer
difficulty
springs
inherent
tension
commitment
safeguarding
precious
fragile
right
go
one
business
free
unwarranted
government
interference
recognition
police
must
allowed
latitude
gathering
information
individuals
willing
cooperate
given
difficulties
perhaps
understandable
efforts
strike
appropriate
balance
produced
uniform
results
nevertheless
outline
appears
appropriate
inquiry
traced
years
clarity
launched
examination
issue
terry
ohio
supra
explaining
fourth
amendment
governs
seizures
person
eventuate
trip
station
house
prosecution
crime
arrests
traditional
terminology
must
recognized
whenever
police
officer
accosts
individual
restrains
freedom
walk
away
seized
person
emphasis
added
seizure
noted
may
evidenced
either
physical
force
show
authority
indicating
individual
liberty
restrained
essential
teaching
decision
terry
individual
right
personal
security
freedom
must
respected
even
encounters
police
fall
short
full
arrest
consistently
reaffirmed
davis
mississippi
example
confirmed
investigatory
detentions
implicate
protections
fourth
amendment
explained
police
right
request
citizens
answer
voluntarily
questions
concerning
unsolved
crimes
right
compel
answer
similarly
brown
texas
supra
overturned
conviction
refusing
stop
identify
oneself
police
making
stop
police
lacked
reasonable
suspicion
based
objective
facts
individual
involved
criminal
activity
animating
principle
underlying
unanimous
decision
fourth
amendment
protects
individual
personal
security
privacy
unreasonable
interference
police
even
interference
amounts
brief
stop
questioning
concerning
one
identity
although
joined
time
one
member
part
justice
stewart
opinion
mendenhall
supra
offered
helpful
preliminary
distillation
lessons
cases
noting
first
long
person
questions
put
remains
free
disregard
questions
walk
away
intrusion
upon
person
liberty
privacy
justice
stewart
explained
person
seized
within
meaning
fourth
amendment
view
circumstances
surrounding
incident
reasonable
person
believed
free
leave
opinion
also
suggested
circumstances
might
include
threatening
presence
several
officers
display
weapon
officer
physical
touching
person
citizen
use
language
tone
voice
indicating
compliance
officer
request
might
compelled
ibid
majority
since
adopted
formula
appropriate
standard
determining
inquiries
made
police
cross
boundary
separating
merely
consensual
encounters
forcible
stops
investigate
suspected
crime
see
florida
royer
plurality
opinion
brennan
concurring
result
blackmun
dissenting
rule
properly
looks
subjective
impressions
person
questioned
rather
objective
characteristics
encounter
may
suggest
whether
reasonable
person
believe
remained
free
course
questioning
disregard
questions
walk
away
see
lafave
search
seizure
governing
principles
guide
us
difficult
area
summarized
royer
plurality
opinion
aw
enforcement
officers
violate
fourth
amendment
merely
approaching
individual
street
another
public
place
asking
willing
answer
questions
putting
questions
person
willing
listen
offering
evidence
criminal
prosecution
voluntary
answers
questions
fact
officer
identifies
police
officer
without
convert
encounter
seizure
requiring
level
objective
justification
person
approached
however
need
answer
question
put
indeed
may
decline
listen
questions
may
go
way
may
detained
even
momentarily
without
reasonable
objective
grounds
refusal
listen
answer
without
furnish
grounds
citations
omitted
emphasis
added
surrounding
circumstances
case
far
different
isolated
encounter
police
passerby
street
respondents
testified
length
widespread
disturbance
among
workers
sparked
ins
surveys
intimidating
atmosphere
created
ins
investigative
tactics
first
respondents
explained
surveys
carried
surprise
relatively
large
numbers
agents
generally
moved
systematically
rows
workers
seated
work
stations
see
app
second
ins
agents
discovered
persons
suspected
illegal
aliens
handcuff
persons
lead
away
waiting
vans
outside
factory
see
third
factory
exits
conspicuously
guarded
ins
agents
stationed
prevent
anyone
leaving
survey
conducted
see
finally
ins
agents
moved
rows
workers
show
badges
direct
pointed
questions
workers
light
circumstances
simply
fantastic
conclude
reasonable
person
ignore
occurring
throughout
factory
ins
agents
reached
temerity
believe
liberty
refuse
answer
questions
walk
away
indeed
experiences
recounted
respondents
clearly
demonstrate
feel
free
either
ignore
ins
agents
refuse
answer
questions
posed
example
respondent
delgado
naturalized
american
citizen
explained
standing
near
work
station
two
ins
agents
approached
identified
immigration
officers
showed
badges
asked
state
born
delgado
course
seen
going
around
point
naturally
responded
final
reminder
controlled
situation
one
ins
agent
remarked
leaving
delgado
coming
back
check
spoke
english
well
respondent
miramontes
described
encounter
ins
similar
terms
told
immigration
showed
work
permit
papers
saw
badge
seen
badge
shown
emphasis
added
testified
frightened
interview
normally
get
nervous
see
everybody
scared
everybody
nervous
ibid
respondent
labontes
testified
sitting
machine
immigration
officer
came
behind
tapped
left
shoulder
asked
papers
explaining
response
demand
testified
turned
time
wish
identify
saw
ins
agents
said
yes
yes
papers
emphasis
added
sum
clear
testimony
respondents
felt
constrained
answer
questions
posed
ins
agents
even
though
wish
feeling
constraint
reasonable
beyond
question
light
surrounding
circumstances
indeed
respondents
testimony
paints
frightening
picture
people
subjected
wholesale
interrogation
conditions
designed
respect
personal
security
privacy
rather
elicit
prompt
answers
completely
intimidated
workers
nothing
clearer
tactics
amounted
seizures
respondents
fourth
amendment
ii
eagerness
conclude
interrogations
represent
seizures
extent
understandable
course
conclusion
permits
avoid
imposing
task
justifying
seizures
basis
reasonable
objective
criteria
required
fourth
amendment
reasonableness
requirement
fourth
amendment
applies
seizures
person
including
involve
brief
detention
short
traditional
arrest
intrusion
upon
individual
personal
security
privacy
limited
cases
sort
explained
brief
detentions
may
justified
facts
amount
probable
cause
required
arrest
nevertheless
prior
decisions
also
make
clear
investigatory
stops
kind
issue
must
justified
objective
manifestation
person
stopped
engaged
criminal
activity
cortez
stated
terry
demand
specificity
information
upon
police
action
predicated
central
teaching
fourth
amendment
jurisprudence
repeatedly
insisted
police
may
detain
interrogate
individual
unless
reasonable
grounds
suspecting
person
involved
unlawful
activity
supra
instance
held
border
patrol
officers
roving
patrol
may
stop
vehicles
aware
specific
articulable
facts
together
rational
inferences
facts
reasonably
warrant
suspicion
vehicles
contain
aliens
may
illegally
country
see
also
michigan
summers
ybarra
illinois
brown
texas
delaware
prouse
adams
williams
davis
mississippi
terry
ohio
requirement
particularized
suspicion
provides
chief
protection
lawful
citizens
unwarranted
governmental
interference
personal
security
privacy
case
individual
seizures
respondents
ins
agents
clearly
neither
based
specific
objective
facts
indicating
society
legitimate
interests
require
seizure
carried
pursuant
plan
embodying
explicit
neutral
limitations
conduct
individual
officers
brown
texas
supra
undisputed
vast
majority
undocumented
aliens
discovered
surveyed
factories
illegally
immigrated
mexico
nevertheless
ins
agents
involved
case
apparently
instructed
words
ins
assistant
district
director
charge
operations
interrogate
virtually
persons
employed
company
app
see
also
consequently
workers
irrespective
whether
american
citizens
permanent
resident
aliens
deportable
aliens
subjected
questioning
ins
agents
concerning
right
remain
country
admission
ins
agents
selectively
question
persons
surveys
basis
reasonable
suspicion
persons
illegal
aliens
see
ins
policy
indiscriminate
surprising
however
since
many
employees
surveyed
factories
lawful
residents
may
born
mexico
latin
appearance
speak
spanish
work
see
means
course
many
lawful
workers
constitute
clear
majority
surveyed
workplaces
subjected
surprise
questioning
intimidating
circumstances
ins
agents
reasonable
basis
suspecting
done
anything
wrong
say
indiscriminate
policy
mass
interrogation
constitutional
makes
mockery
words
fourth
amendment
furthermore
even
ins
agents
pursued
firm
policy
stopping
interrogating
persons
reasonably
suspected
aliens
still
failed
given
particular
circumstances
case
safeguard
adequately
rights
secured
fourth
amendment
first
view
insurmountable
problem
policy
viewed
realistically
poses
grave
problems
execution
practice
affords
virtually
protection
lawful
american
citizens
working
factories
recognized
supra
reliable
way
distinguish
reasonable
degree
accuracy
naturalized
citizens
mexican
ancestry
one
hand
aliens
mexican
ancestry
see
also
developments
immigration
policy
rights
aliens
harv
rev
indeed
record
case
clearly
demonstrates
danger
since
respondents
correa
delgado
although
american
citizens
subjected
questioning
ins
surveys
moreover
mere
fact
person
believed
alien
provides
immediate
grounds
suspecting
illegal
activity
congress
course
possesses
broad
power
regulate
admission
exclusion
aliens
see
kliendeinst
mandel
fiallo
bell
resident
aliens
surely
may
required
register
ins
carry
proper
identification
see
nonetheless
held
executive
branch
seeks
enforce
congressional
policies
may
employ
enforcement
techniques
threaten
constitutional
rights
american
citizens
contexts
factory
surveys
virtually
impossible
distinguish
fairly
citizens
aliens
threat
vital
civil
rights
american
citizens
soon
become
intolerable
simply
permitted
ins
question
persons
solely
account
suspected
alienage
cf
therefore
order
protect
american
citizens
lawful
resident
aliens
also
protected
fourth
amendment
see
ins
must
tailor
enforcement
efforts
focus
workers
reasonably
suspected
illegal
aliens
relying
upon
however
justice
powell
hold
interrogation
respondents
represented
reasonable
seizure
fourth
amendment
even
though
ins
agents
lacked
particularized
suspicion
illegal
alienage
support
questioning
ante
view
reliance
decision
misplaced
held
intrusion
upon
protected
privacy
interests
extremely
limited
ins
order
serve
pressing
governmental
interest
immigration
enforcement
may
briefly
detain
travelers
fixed
checkpoints
questioning
solely
basis
apparent
mexican
ancestry
holding
careful
distinguish
earlier
decision
supra
held
border
patrol
agents
conducting
roving
patrols
may
stop
question
motorists
solely
basis
apparent
mexican
ancestry
may
instead
make
stops
observations
lead
reasonably
suspect
particular
vehicle
may
contain
aliens
illegally
country
crucial
distinction
roving
patrols
fixed
checkpoints
later
observed
delaware
prouse
lesser
intrusion
upon
motorist
fourth
amendment
interests
caused
checkpoint
operations
thus
explained
objective
intrusion
stop
questioning
visual
inspection
also
existed
stops
view
checkpoint
stops
different
light
subjective
intrusion
generating
concern
even
fright
part
lawful
travelers
appreciably
less
case
checkpoint
stop
limited
departure
terry
general
requirement
particularized
suspicion
permitted
turned
therefore
largely
fact
intrusion
upon
motorists
resulting
checkpoint
operations
extremely
modest
case
contrast
equivalent
guarantees
privacy
lawful
workers
substantially
invaded
factory
surveys
workers
frightened
ins
tactics
indeed
opposite
true
first
unlike
fixed
checkpoints
upheld
part
location
known
motorists
advance
ins
factory
surveys
sprung
upon
unsuspecting
workers
completely
surprise
respondents
testified
sudden
arrival
large
numbers
ins
agents
created
widespread
fear
anxiety
among
workers
see
app
respondent
miramontes
instance
explained
afraid
surveys
ecause
leave
think
papers
shoot
something
see
leaving
think
guilty
absolutely
evidence
widespread
fear
anxiety
similar
adduced
case
second
degree
unfettered
discretionary
judgment
exercised
individual
ins
agents
factory
surveys
considerably
greater
fixed
checkpoint
operations
power
individual
ins
agents
decide
stop
question
pass
contributes
significantly
feeling
uncertainty
anxiety
workers
see
app
unlike
fixed
checkpoint
operation
reliable
sense
among
affected
workers
survey
conducted
orderly
predictable
manner
third
although
workplace
obviously
private
home
time
without
element
privacy
greater
automobile
motorists
expect
highway
subject
general
police
surveillance
part
regular
expectable
enforcement
traffic
laws
average
employee
however
workplace
encloses
small
recognizable
community
locus
friendships
gossip
common
effort
shared
experience
work
therefore
average
employee
sense
anonymity
felt
one
driving
public
highways
instead
employee
known
recognize
employees
fellows
experience
common
enough
among
work
forms
basis
legitimate
albeit
modest
expectation
privacy
indiscriminately
invaded
government
agents
see
mancusi
deforte
employee
reasonable
expectation
privacy
office
space
shared
workers
mere
fact
employer
consented
entry
ins
onto
property
mean
workers
expectation
privacy
evaporates
finally
historical
precedent
kinds
surveys
make
expectable
predictable
noted
supra
road
checkpoints
supported
extent
long
history
acceptance
diminishes
substantially
concern
fear
practices
elicit
average
motorist
factory
surveys
kind
conducted
ins
wholly
unprecedented
novelty
therefore
expected
engender
high
degree
resentment
anxiety
sum
although
governmental
interest
obviously
substantial
degree
intrusion
upon
privacy
rights
lawful
workers
significantly
greater
accordingly
quantum
suspicion
required
justify
intrusion
must
correspondingly
greater
view
therefore
acceptable
alternatives
adequately
safeguard
fourth
amendment
values
context
ins
either
adopt
firm
policy
stopping
questioning
workers
reasonably
suspected
illegal
aliens
develop
factory
survey
program
predictably
reliably
less
intrusive
current
scheme
review
first
alternative
satisfy
requirement
particularized
suspicion
enunciated
terry
principle
must
control
specific
conditions
permitted
exception
requirement
simply
present
second
alternative
seek
redesign
factory
survey
techniques
used
ins
order
bring
closely
line
characteristics
found
scheme
might
require
ins
conducting
survey
workers
particular
plant
secure
administrative
warrant
based
upon
showing
reasonable
grounds
exist
believing
substantial
number
workers
employed
factory
undocumented
aliens
subject
deportation
practical
alternatives
conducting
survey
cf
camara
municipal
addition
surveys
tailored
duration
manner
substantially
less
intrusive
iii
one
doubts
presence
large
numbers
undocumented
aliens
country
creates
law
enforcement
problems
titanic
proportions
ins
anyone
question
agency
must
afforded
considerable
latitude
meeting
delegated
enforcement
responsibilities
afraid
however
become
mesmerized
magnitude
problem
easily
allowed
fourth
amendment
freedoms
sacrificed
discard
efforts
respect
commands
fourth
amendment
troubling
area
however
worth
remembering
difficulties
faced
ins
today
partly
making
ins
methods
review
case
view
product
expedience
prudent
law
enforcement
policy
immigration
nationality
act
establishes
system
regulating
admission
immigrants
country
designed
operate
primarily
borders
see
see
generally
developments
harv
respect
mexican
immigration
however
system
almost
completely
broken
breakdown
due
part
course
considerable
practical
problems
patroling
border
however
also
result
failure
commit
sufficient
resources
border
patrol
effort
see
administration
proposals
immigration
refugee
policy
joint
hearing
subcommittee
immigration
refugees
international
law
house
committee
judiciary
subcommittee
immigration
refugee
policy
senate
committee
judiciary
statement
attorney
general
smith
see
also
developments
harv
furthermore
act
expressly
exempts
american
business
employ
undocumented
aliens
criminal
sanctions
thereby
adding
already
powerful
incentives
aliens
cross
borders
illegally
search
employment
face
facts
seems
anomalous
insist
ins
must
permitted
virtually
unconstrained
discretion
conduct
searches
undocumented
aliens
otherwise
lawful
places
employment
interior
position
amounts
submit
admission
since
allowed
border
enforcement
collapse
since
unwilling
require
american
employers
share
blame
must
matter
expediency
visit
burdens
enforcement
scheme
privacy
interests
completely
lawful
citizens
resident
aliens
subjected
factory
raids
solely
happen
work
alongside
undocumented
aliens
average
american
long
recognized
see
carroll
expects
interference
liberty
seeking
cross
nation
borders
today
decision
one
ever
expected
treatment
lawfully
work
country
interior
conditions
spawned
expedient
solutions
sense
fault
lawful
workers
guardian
constitutional
rights
attend
problem
greater
sensitivity
simply
pronouncing
fourth
amendment
dead
letter
context
immigration
enforcement
answer
problems
suggest
lie
abandoning
commitment
protecting
cherished
rights
secured
fourth
amendment
rather
may
found
reexamining
immigration
policy
dissent
enforcement
activities
ins
divided
border
patrol
operations
conducted
along
border
functional
equivalents
area
control
operations
conducted
interior
ins
area
control
operations
turn
divided
traffic
control
operations
maintaining
fixed
checkpoints
major
highways
factory
surveys
kind
issue
case
seems
correctly
finds
single
continuing
seizure
entire
work
force
moment
ins
agents
first
secured
factory
exits
completion
survey
join
judgment
respect
apparent
three
factory
surveys
review
employees
generally
free
survey
conducted
continue
working
without
interruption
move
workplace
said
however
emphasize
find
evidence
concerning
conduct
factorywide
survey
highly
relevant
determining
whether
individual
respondents
seized
see
infra
although
respondents
insist
circumstances
interrogations
sufficiently
coercive
constitute
seizure
fourth
amendment
contend
interviews
conducted
conditions
might
labeled
custodial
argue
therefore
questioning
ins
agents
posed
threat
privilege
protected
fifth
amendment
arizona
accordingly
necessary
consider
whether
ins
agents
required
warn
respondents
possible
incriminating
consequences
providing
answers
agents
questions
explained
large
numbers
naturalized
citizens
physical
characteristics
identified
mexican
ancestry
even
border
area
relatively
small
proportion
aliens
indeed
proposition
ins
agents
even
considerable
experience
field
able
fairly
accurately
distinguish
persons
mexican
ancestry
either
naturalized
citizens
persons
mexican
ancestry
aliens
implausible
subject
discriminatory
abuse
protection
fundamental
constitutional
rights
depend
upon
unconstrained
administrative
discretion
often
observed
hen
stop
based
objective
criteria
risk
arbitrary
abusive
police
practices
exceeds
tolerable
limits
brown
texas
course
government
points
see
brief
petitioners
immigration
nationality
act
provides
ins
officers
may
without
warrant
interrogate
alien
person
believed
alien
right
remain
stat
held
however
broad
statutory
authority
kind
license
ins
employ
unconstitutional
enforcement
methods
concern
expressly
left
open
question
whether
ins
officers
may
stop
persons
reasonably
believed
aliens
reason
believe
illegally
country
view
given
particular
constitutional
dangers
posed
ins
present
method
carrying
factory
surveys
exercise
authority
granted
must
limited
interrogations
persons
reasonably
believed
country
illegally
indeed
repeatedly
emphasized
contrast
roving
patrol
stops
fixed
checkpoint
operations
less
likely
frighten
motorists
otorists
using
highways
taken
surprise
know
location
checkpoints
stopped
elsewhere
operations
appear
actually
involve
less
discretionary
enforcement
activity
see
also
commission
civil
rights
tarnished
golden
door
civil
rights
issues
immigration
noting
estimony
received
commission
indicates
ins
area
control
operations
cause
confusion
pandemonium
among
factory
employees
thereby
disrupting
factory
operations
decreasing
production
enormous
law
enforcement
problems
resulting
combination
practical
difficulties
patrolling
border
incentives
illegal
aliens
secure
employment
noted
congress
see
hearings
oversight
immigration
naturalization
service
subcommittee
immigration
citizenship
international
law
house
committee
judiciary
sess
also
select
commission
immigration
refugee
policy
see
immigration
policy
national
interest
final
report
select
commission
immigration
refugee
policy
regard
views
expressed
justice
white
concurring
opinion
ortiz
particularly
pertinent
entire
immigration
enforcement
system
however
notably
unsuccessful
deterring
stemming
heavy
flow
illegal
immigration
costs
including
added
burdens
courts
substantial
perhaps
judiciary
strain
accommodate
requirements
fourth
amendment
needs
system
best
demonstrate
minimal
effectiveness
long
lawful
business
firms
others
employ
aliens
illegally
country
problem
ordinary
law
enforcement
able
solve
essentially
poses
questions
national
policy
chiefly
business
congress
executive
branch
rather
courts