fly
dollar
park
fly
argued
october
decided
january
petitioner
operates
parking
lots
near
airports
louis
cleveland
houston
boston
memphis
san
francisco
petitioner
applied
patent
trademark
office
register
service
mark
consisting
logo
airplane
words
fly
registration
issued
nearly
six
years
later
petitioner
filed
affidavit
patent
trademark
office
establish
incontestable
status
mark
trademark
act
lanham
act
provides
registration
shall
conclusive
evidence
registrant
exclusive
right
use
registered
mark
subject
provisions
respondent
provides
airport
parking
services
called
dollar
park
fly
operates
portland
petitioner
filed
infringement
action
federal
district
seeking
enjoin
respondent
using
words
park
fly
connection
business
district
granted
injunction
rejecting
inter
alia
respondent
defense
petitioner
mark
unenforceable
merely
descriptive
appeals
reversed
holding
incontestability
provides
defense
cancellation
mark
may
used
offensively
enjoin
another
use
analysis
petitioner
obtain
injunction
mark
entitled
continued
registration
without
regard
incontestable
status
therefore
respondent
defend
showing
mark
merely
descriptive
determined
petitioner
mark
merely
descriptive
respondent
enjoined
using
words
park
fly
held
holder
registered
mark
may
rely
incontestability
enjoin
infringement
infringement
action
may
defended
grounds
mark
merely
descriptive
pp
lanham
act
nowhere
distinguishes
registrant
offensive
defensive
use
incontestable
mark
contrary
declaration
registrant
exclusive
right
use
mark
indicates
incontestable
status
may
used
enjoin
infringement
act
language
also
refutes
conclusion
incontestable
mark
may
challenged
merely
descriptive
pp
nothing
lanham
act
legislative
history
supports
departure
plain
language
provisions
concerning
incontestability
indeed
conclusion
incontestable
status
may
provide
basis
enforcement
registrant
exclusive
right
use
mark
promotes
act
goals
providing
national
protection
trademarks
order
secure
mark
owner
goodwill
business
protect
ability
consumers
distinguish
among
competing
producers
pp
merit
respondent
argument
appeals
decision
upheld
trademark
registrations
issued
ex
parte
proceeding
generally
without
inquiry
merits
application
facts
case
belie
suggestion
registration
virtually
automatic
respondent
simply
wrong
suggest
third
parties
opportunity
challenge
applications
trademark
registration
power
courts
lanham
act
grant
injunctions
according
principles
equity
encompass
substantive
challenge
validity
incontestable
mark
grounds
lacks
secondary
meaning
otherwise
meaning
equity
expanded
point
vitiating
act
specific
provisions
similarly
power
courts
cancel
registrations
otherwise
rectify
register
act
must
subject
specific
provisions
concerning
incontestability
pp
appeals
justified
relying
decision
tillamook
county
creamery
tillamook
cheese
dairy
cert
denied
proposition
registrant
may
rely
incontestability
enjoin
use
mark
pp
delivered
opinion
burger
brennan
white
marshall
blackmun
powell
rehnquist
joined
stevens
filed
dissenting
opinion
post
alan
popkin
argued
cause
petitioner
briefs
timothy
noelker
john
mccormack
argued
cause
respondent
brief
pierre
kolisch
thomas
mccarthy
filed
brief
american
intellectual
property
law
association
et
al
amici
curiae
urging
reversal
justice
delivered
opinion
case
consider
whether
action
enjoin
infringement
incontestable
trade
service
mark
may
defended
grounds
mark
merely
descriptive
conclude
neither
language
relevant
statutes
legislative
history
supports
defense
petitioner
operates
parking
lots
near
airports
starting
business
louis
petitioner
subsequently
opened
facilities
cleveland
houston
boston
memphis
san
francisco
petitioner
applied
patent
trademark
office
patent
office
register
service
mark
consisting
logo
airplane
words
fly
registration
issued
august
nearly
six
years
later
petitioner
filed
affidavit
patent
office
establish
incontestable
status
mark
required
trademark
act
lanham
act
stat
amended
affidavit
stated
mark
registered
continuous
use
five
consecutive
years
final
adverse
decision
petitioner
claim
ownership
right
registration
proceedings
involving
rights
pending
incontestable
status
provides
subject
provisions
lanham
act
conclusive
evidence
registrant
exclusive
right
use
registered
mark
respondent
also
provides
airport
parking
services
operations
portland
oregon
respondent
calls
business
dollar
park
fly
petitioner
filed
infringement
action
district
district
oregon
requested
permanently
enjoin
respondent
using
words
park
fly
connection
business
respondent
counterclaimed
sought
cancellation
petitioner
mark
grounds
generic
term
see
respondent
also
argued
petitioner
mark
unenforceable
merely
descriptive
see
two
additional
defenses
respondent
maintained
privity
seattle
corporation
used
expression
park
fly
since
date
prior
registration
petitioner
mark
see
infringed
likelihood
confusion
see
bench
trial
district
found
petitioner
mark
generic
observed
incontestable
mark
challenged
grounds
merely
descriptive
app
district
also
concluded
evidence
privity
respondent
seattle
corporation
app
finally
district
found
sufficient
evidence
likelihood
confusion
app
district
permanently
enjoined
respondent
using
words
park
fly
mark
confusingly
similar
fly
app
appeals
ninth
circuit
reversed
district
err
appeals
held
refusing
invalidate
petitioner
mark
appeals
noted
however
previously
held
incontestability
provides
defense
cancellation
mark
may
used
offensively
enjoin
another
use
ibid
petitioner
analysis
obtain
injunction
mark
entitled
continued
registration
without
regard
incontestable
status
thus
respondent
defend
infringement
action
showing
mark
merely
descriptive
based
examination
record
appeals
determined
petitioner
mark
fact
merely
descriptive
therefore
respondent
enjoined
using
name
park
fly
ibid
decision
direct
conflict
decision
appeals
seventh
circuit
union
carbide
cert
denied
granted
certiorari
resolve
conflict
reverse
ii
congress
enacted
lanham
act
order
provide
national
protection
trademarks
used
interstate
foreign
commerce
previous
federal
legislation
federal
trademark
act
stat
reflected
view
protection
trademarks
matter
state
concern
right
mark
depended
solely
common
law
consequently
rights
trademarks
uncertain
subject
variation
different
parts
country
trademarks
desirably
promote
competition
maintenance
product
quality
congress
determined
sound
public
policy
requires
trademarks
receive
nationally
greatest
protection
given
among
new
protections
created
lanham
act
statutory
provisions
allow
federally
registered
mark
become
incontestable
provisions
lanham
act
concerning
registration
incontestability
distinguish
mark
common
descriptive
name
article
substance
mark
merely
descriptive
marks
constitute
common
descriptive
name
referred
generic
generic
term
one
refers
genus
particular
product
species
abercrombie
fitch
hunting
world
generic
terms
registrable
registered
mark
may
canceled
time
grounds
become
generic
see
merely
descriptive
mark
contrast
describes
qualities
characteristics
good
service
type
mark
may
registered
registrant
shows
acquired
secondary
meaning
become
distinctive
applicant
goods
commerce
case
requires
us
consider
effect
incontestability
provisions
lanham
act
context
infringement
action
defended
grounds
mark
merely
descriptive
statutory
construction
must
begin
language
employed
congress
assumption
ordinary
meaning
language
accurately
expresses
legislative
purpose
see
american
tobacco
patterson
respect
incontestable
trade
service
marks
lanham
act
registration
shall
conclusive
evidence
registrant
exclusive
right
use
registered
mark
subject
conditions
certain
enumerated
defenses
section
incorporates
reference
subsections
incontestable
mark
becomes
generic
may
canceled
time
pursuant
section
also
allows
cancellation
incontestable
mark
time
abandoned
used
misrepresent
source
goods
services
connection
used
obtained
fraudulently
contrary
provisions
one
searches
language
lanham
act
vain
find
support
distinction
applied
appeals
statute
nowhere
distinguishes
registrant
offensive
defensive
use
incontestable
mark
contrary
declaration
registrant
exclusive
right
use
mark
indicates
incontestable
status
may
used
enjoin
infringement
others
conclusion
infringement
enjoined
renders
meaningless
exclusive
right
recognized
statute
moreover
language
three
defenses
enumerated
clearly
contemplates
use
incontestability
infringement
actions
plaintiffs
see
language
lanham
act
also
refutes
conclusion
incontestable
mark
may
challenged
merely
descriptive
mark
merely
descriptive
applicant
goods
services
registrable
unless
mark
secondary
meaning
mark
achieves
incontestable
status
registration
provides
prima
facie
evidence
registrant
exclusive
right
use
mark
commerce
lanham
act
expressly
provides
mark
becomes
incontestable
opposing
party
may
prove
legal
equitable
defense
might
asserted
mark
registered
ibid
thus
allowed
respondent
challenge
petitioner
mark
merely
descriptive
mark
become
incontestable
respect
incontestable
marks
however
provides
registration
conclusive
evidence
registrant
exclusive
right
use
mark
subject
conditions
seven
defenses
enumerated
mere
descriptiveness
recognized
either
basis
challenging
incontestable
mark
statutory
provisions
prohibit
registration
merely
descriptive
mark
allow
incontestable
mark
challenged
ground
attributed
inadvertence
congress
conference
committee
rejected
amendment
denied
registration
descriptive
mark
instead
retained
provisions
allowing
registration
merely
descriptive
mark
acquired
secondary
meaning
see
conf
explanatory
statement
house
managers
conference
committee
agreed
amendment
providing
incontestable
right
acquired
mark
common
descriptive
generic
term
congress
easily
denied
incontestability
merely
descriptive
marks
well
generic
marks
intention
appeals
discussing
distinction
observed
incontestability
protects
registrant
cancellation
mark
observation
incorrect
respect
marks
become
generic
otherwise
may
canceled
time
pursuant
moreover
applied
marks
merely
descriptive
approach
appeals
makes
incontestable
status
superfluous
without
regard
incontestable
status
mark
registered
five
years
protected
cancellation
except
grounds
stated
pursuant
mark
may
canceled
grounds
merely
descriptive
petition
cancel
filed
within
five
years
date
registration
approach
adopted
appeals
implies
incontestability
adds
nothing
protections
cancellation
already
provided
decision
lacks
support
words
statute
effectively
emasculates
circumstances
case
iii
nothing
legislative
history
lanham
act
supports
departure
plain
language
statutory
provisions
concerning
incontestability
indeed
conclusion
incontestable
status
provide
basis
enforcement
registrant
exclusive
right
use
trade
service
mark
promotes
goals
statute
lanham
act
provides
national
protection
trademarks
order
secure
owner
mark
goodwill
business
protect
ability
consumers
distinguish
among
competing
producers
see
national
protection
trademarks
desirable
congress
concluded
trademarks
foster
competition
maintenance
quality
securing
producer
benefits
good
reputation
incontestability
provisions
proponents
lanham
act
emphasized
provide
means
registrant
quiet
title
ownership
mark
see
hearings
subcommittee
senate
committee
patents
remarks
lanham
testimony
daphne
robert
aba
committee
trade
mark
legislation
hearings
et
al
subcommittee
house
committee
patents
remarks
lanham
opportunity
obtain
incontestable
status
satisfying
requirements
thus
encourages
producers
cultivate
goodwill
associated
particular
mark
function
incontestability
provisions
utterly
frustrated
holder
incontestable
mark
enjoin
infringement
others
long
established
mark
registrable
incontestable
status
respondent
argues
however
enforcing
petitioner
mark
conflict
goals
lanham
act
mark
merely
descriptive
never
registered
first
place
representative
lanham
respondent
notes
explained
defenses
enumerated
intended
enlarge
restrict
amend
modify
substantive
law
trademarks
either
set
sections
act
heretofore
applied
courts
prior
laws
cong
rec
respondent
reasons
lanham
act
alter
substantive
law
trademarks
incontestability
provisions
protect
petitioner
use
mark
originally
registrable
moreover
inasmuch
petitioner
mark
merely
descriptive
respondent
contends
enjoining
others
using
mark
encourage
competition
assisting
consumers
ability
distinguish
among
competing
producers
arguments
unpersuasive
representative
lanham
remarks
read
context
clearly
refer
effect
defenses
enumerated
question
lanham
act
altered
existing
law
concerning
trademark
rights
several
respects
example
provides
constructive
notice
registration
modifies
rule
allowed
acquisition
concurrent
rights
users
distinct
geographic
areas
subsequent
user
adopted
mark
without
knowledge
prior
use
see
hanover
star
milling
metcalf
describing
act
law
similarly
cuts
certain
grounds
cancellation
five
years
registration
thereby
modifies
previous
rule
validity
trademark
attacked
time
see
white
house
milk
products
pat
significantly
representative
lanham
observed
incontestability
one
valuable
new
rights
created
act
cong
rec
respondent
argument
enforcing
petitioner
mark
promote
goals
lanham
act
misdirected
arguments
similar
urged
respondent
fact
considered
congress
hearings
lanham
act
example
department
justice
opposed
incontestability
provisions
expressly
noted
merely
descriptive
mark
might
become
incontestable
hearings
statement
dept
justice
result
department
justice
observed
go
beyond
existing
law
conferring
unprecedented
rights
owners
undesirably
create
exclusive
right
use
language
descriptive
product
see
also
hearings
testimony
milton
handler
testimony
attorney
louis
robertson
concerns
answered
proponents
lanham
act
noted
merely
descriptive
mark
registered
unless
commissioner
finds
secondary
meaning
testimony
karl
pohl
trade
mark
moreover
mark
challenged
five
years
prior
attaining
incontestable
status
remarks
lanham
supporters
incontestability
provisions
observed
generic
mark
become
incontestable
allows
nontrademark
use
descriptive
terms
used
incontestable
mark
testimony
wallace
martin
chairman
aba
committee
trade
mark
legislation
alternative
refusing
provide
incontestable
status
descriptive
marks
secondary
meaning
expressly
noted
hearings
lanham
act
testimony
robert
byerley
new
york
patent
law
assn
hearings
subcommittee
senate
committee
patents
testimony
elliot
moyer
special
assistant
attorney
general
also
mentioned
possibility
including
defense
infringement
incontestable
mark
fact
mark
descriptive
generic
geographical
term
device
congress
however
adopt
either
alternatives
instead
congress
expressly
provided
incontestable
mark
challenged
specified
grounds
grounds
identified
congress
include
mere
descriptiveness
dissent
echoes
arguments
made
opponents
lanham
act
incontestable
status
descriptive
mark
might
take
public
domain
language
merely
descriptive
post
explained
congress
already
addressed
concerns
prevent
commercial
monopolization
post
descriptive
language
lanham
act
allows
mark
challenged
time
becomes
generic
certain
circumstances
permits
nontrademark
use
descriptive
terms
contained
incontestable
mark
finally
monopolization
incontestable
mark
threatens
economic
competition
provides
defense
grounds
mark
used
violate
federal
antitrust
laws
bottom
dissent
simply
disagrees
balance
struck
congress
determining
protection
given
incontestable
marks
iv
respondent
argues
decision
appeals
upheld
trademark
registrations
issued
patent
office
ex
parte
proceeding
generally
without
inquiry
merits
application
argument
also
unravels
upon
close
examination
facts
case
belie
suggestion
registration
virtually
automatic
patent
office
initially
denied
petitioner
application
examiner
considered
mark
merely
descriptive
petitioner
sought
reconsideration
successfully
persuaded
patent
office
mark
registrable
generally
respondent
simply
wrong
suggest
third
parties
opportunity
challenge
applications
trademark
registration
patent
office
examiner
determines
applicant
appears
entitled
registration
mark
published
official
gazette
within
days
publication
person
believes
damaged
registration
mark
may
file
opposition
registration
mark
provides
constructive
notice
throughout
registrant
claim
ownership
within
five
years
registration
person
believes
damaged
registration
may
seek
cancel
mark
mark
may
canceled
time
certain
specified
grounds
including
obtained
fraudulently
become
generic
lanham
act
dissent
notes
post
authorizes
courts
grant
injunctions
according
principles
equity
neither
respondent
opinion
appeals
relies
provision
support
holding
whatever
precise
boundaries
courts
equitable
power
believe
encompasses
substantive
challenge
validity
incontestable
mark
grounds
lacks
secondary
meaning
conclude
otherwise
expand
meaning
equity
point
vitiating
specific
provisions
lanham
act
similarly
power
courts
cancel
registrations
otherwise
rectify
register
must
subject
specific
provisions
concerning
incontestability
effect
respondent
dissent
argue
provisions
offer
insufficient
protection
improper
registration
merely
descriptive
mark
therefore
validity
petitioner
mark
may
challenged
notwithstanding
incontestable
status
responsibility
however
evaluate
wisdom
legislative
determinations
reflected
statute
instead
construe
apply
provisions
congress
enacted
appeals
attempt
justify
decision
reference
language
legislative
history
lanham
act
instead
relied
previous
decision
tillamook
county
creamery
tillamook
cheese
dairy
cert
denied
proposition
registrant
may
rely
incontestability
enjoin
use
mark
others
examination
tillamook
however
reveals
persuasive
justification
judicially
created
distinction
offensive
defensive
use
incontestable
mark
tillamook
discussed
dicta
distinction
observed
incontestability
protects
registrant
cancellation
used
obtain
relief
infringing
use
tillamook
authority
proposition
john
morrell
reliable
packing
reverse
finding
infringement
grounds
incontestable
status
confers
defensive
rights
appeals
seventh
circuit
based
holding
john
morrell
rand
mcnally
christmas
club
aff
pat
latter
case
fact
involve
use
incontestable
mark
enforcement
action
patent
office
rand
mcnally
denied
petition
cancel
mark
challenged
merely
descriptive
petitioner
feared
mark
became
incontestable
use
mark
connection
service
different
one
specified
registration
enjoined
assistant
commissioner
patents
answered
concern
observing
incontestable
mark
provide
registrant
offensive
weapon
greater
magnitude
since
registration
issued
comments
suggest
incontestability
may
never
provide
basis
injunctive
relief
instead
indicate
mark
may
expanded
beyond
good
service
originally
designated
john
morrell
judicial
authority
providing
direct
support
decision
subsequently
overruled
union
carbide
cert
denied
union
carbide
appeals
seventh
circuit
acknowledged
earlier
decision
john
morrell
unsupported
language
legislative
history
lanham
act
based
misreading
rand
mcnally
registrant
may
rely
incontestable
status
mark
infringement
action
union
carbide
concluded
efendant
faced
incontestable
registered
mark
defend
claiming
mark
invalid
descriptive
quoting
mccarthy
trademarks
unfair
competition
ed
courts
subsequently
followed
union
carbide
concluded
plaintiff
may
rely
incontestable
status
trade
service
mark
infringement
action
see
jaycees
philadelphia
jaycees
soweco
shell
oil
cert
denied
patent
office
also
rejected
distinction
respect
use
incontestable
mark
see
ansul
malter
international
ttab
thus
doctrine
relied
appeals
case
best
described
flawed
origin
subsequently
discredited
progenitors
vi
conclude
holder
registered
mark
may
rely
incontestability
enjoin
infringement
action
may
defended
grounds
mark
merely
descriptive
respondent
urges
nevertheless
affirm
decision
based
prior
use
defense
recognized
lanham
act
alternatively
respondent
argues
likelihood
confusion
therefore
infringement
justifying
injunctive
relief
district
rejected
arguments
addressed
appeals
may
consider
remand
judgment
appeals
reversed
case
remanded
proceedings
consistent
opinion
ordered
footnotes
petitioner
also
applied
register
mark
consisting
words
fly
mark
issued
become
incontestable
existence
mark
affect
resolution
issues
case
section
lanham
act
set
forth
provides
right
use
registered
mark
become
incontestable
section
title
registration
shall
conclusive
evidence
registrant
exclusive
right
use
registered
mark
commerce
connection
goods
services
specified
affidavit
filed
provisions
said
section
subject
conditions
limitations
stated
therein
except
one
following
defenses
defects
established
registration
incontestable
right
use
mark
obtained
fraudulently
mark
abandoned
registrant
registered
mark
used
permission
registrant
person
privity
registrant
misrepresent
source
goods
services
connection
mark
used
use
name
term
device
charged
infringement
use
otherwise
trade
service
mark
party
individual
name
business
individual
name
anyone
privity
party
term
device
descriptive
used
fairly
good
faith
describe
users
goods
services
party
geographic
origin
mark
whose
use
party
charged
infringement
adopted
without
knowledge
registrant
prior
use
continuously
used
party
privity
date
prior
registration
mark
chapter
publication
registered
mark
subsection
section
title
provided
however
defense
defect
shall
apply
area
continuous
prior
use
proved
mark
whose
use
charged
infringement
registered
used
prior
registration
chapter
publication
subsection
section
title
registered
mark
registrant
abandoned
provided
however
defense
defect
shall
apply
area
mark
used
prior
registration
publication
registrant
mark
mark
used
violate
antitrust
laws
sections
prohibit
registration
marks
containing
specified
subject
matter
flag
sections
concern
certification
marks
inapplicable
case
dissent
similarly
takes
position
mark
improperly
issued
descriptive
petitioner
failed
prove
secondary
meaning
post
neither
district
appeals
made
finding
whether
mark
properly
issued
patent
office
denied
initial
application
registration
petitioner
filed
request
reconsideration
arguing
mark
descriptive
app
patent
office
subsequently
granted
registration
without
specifying
whether
mark
secondary
meaning
instead
descriptive
unlike
dissent
decline
determine
first
instance
whether
mark
improperly
issued
holding
affected
possibility
mark
become
merely
descriptive
representative
lanham
made
remarks
clarify
seven
defenses
enumerated
substantive
rules
law
go
validity
enforceability
incontestable
mark
cong
rec
instead
defenses
affect
evidentiary
status
registration
owner
claims
benefit
mark
incontestable
status
one
defenses
established
registration
constitutes
prima
facie
conclusive
evidence
owner
right
exclusive
use
mark
ibid
see
also
conf
explanatory
statement
house
managers
note
however
need
address
case
whether
traditional
equitable
defenses
estoppel
laches
available
action
enforce
incontestable
mark
see
generally
comment
incontestable
trademark
rights
equitable
defenses
infringement
litigation
rev
justice
stevens
dissenting
trademark
law
term
incontestable
somewhat
confusing
misleading
lanham
act
expressly
identifies
situations
infringement
allegedly
incontestable
mark
permitted
moreover
act
congress
unambiguously
authorized
judicial
review
validity
registration
action
involving
registered
mark
problem
case
arises
petitioner
attempt
enforce
incontestable
mark
congress
plainly
stated
inherently
unregistrable
mark
fly
best
merely
descriptive
context
airport
parking
section
lanham
act
plainly
prohibits
registration
mark
unless
applicant
proves
commissioner
patent
trademark
office
mark
become
distinctive
applicant
goods
commerce
use
accepted
shorthand
acquired
secondary
meaning
see
petitioner
never
submitted
proof
commissioner
indeed
district
case
thus
registration
plainly
violated
act
violation
literal
wording
act
also
contravened
central
purpose
entire
legislative
scheme
statutory
protection
trademarks
granted
order
safeguard
goodwill
associated
particular
enterprises
mark
must
perform
function
distinguishing
producer
provider
good
service
order
legitimate
claim
protection
merely
descriptive
mark
acquired
secondary
meaning
perform
function
simply
describes
qualities
characteristics
good
service
ante
legislative
purpose
served
granting
anyone
monopoly
use
mark
instead
confronting
question
whether
inherently
unregistrable
mark
provide
basis
injunction
alleged
infringement
treats
case
though
presented
question
union
carbide
cert
denied
case
merely
descriptive
mark
obvious
secondary
meaning
case
agree
descriptive
character
mark
provide
infringer
defense
case
however
provisions
act
dealing
incontestable
marks
support
result
reached
shall
first
explain
agree
conclusion
appeals
reached
shall
comment
three
arguments
advances
support
contrary
conclusion
word
incontestable
defined
act
surprisingly
concept
explained
committee
reports
bill
enacted
word
implies
intended
resolve
potential
contests
rival
claimants
particular
mark
indeed
testimony
proponents
concept
committee
hearings
occurred
time
time
period
legislation
considered
reveals
primarily
concerned
problem
potential
contests
ownership
registrable
marks
might
present
one
ever
suggested
public
purpose
served
granting
incontestable
status
mark
never
accepted
registration
first
instance
hearings
witnesses
frequently
referred
incontestability
comparable
decree
quieting
title
real
property
decree
forecloses
contest
ownership
property
create
property
similarly
incontestability
trademark
precludes
competitor
contesting
registrant
ownership
convert
unregistrable
subject
matter
valid
mark
claim
clearly
unenforceable
case
petitioner
principally
urges
support
reversal
union
carbide
supra
conflict
simple
proposition
dealing
contest
two
companies
name
eveready
question
name
acquired
secondary
meaning
although
originally
registered
problem
presented
case
properly
resolved
giving
effect
incontestable
language
act
wholly
different
question
presented
record
establishes
mark
registered
legislative
history
incontestability
provisions
indicates
congress
intend
prevent
use
mere
descriptiveness
substantive
defense
claim
infringement
mark
acquired
secondary
meaning
testimony
committee
hearings
concerning
public
interest
preventing
grant
monopoly
privileges
use
merely
descriptive
phrases
expressly
relied
administrative
practice
incorporated
protection
improper
registration
merely
descriptive
marks
thus
karl
pohl
testified
question
nontechnical
trademarks
professor
handler
assumes
improperly
registered
idea
originate
carefully
circumscribed
procedure
getting
marks
register
means
easy
chairman
gentlemen
committee
exceedingly
difficult
get
descriptive
words
register
patent
office
first
place
reject
submit
substantial
body
evidence
words
usage
acquired
secondary
meaning
usage
acquired
special
status
entitles
protected
secondary
meaning
sense
therefore
call
marks
improperly
registered
believe
misnomer
look
problem
point
view
see
apprehensions
handler
less
obviated
believe
personally
completely
obviated
nontechnical
carefully
circumscribed
number
entitled
protection
registrant
merely
descriptive
mark
complies
statutory
requirement
prima
facie
evidence
secondary
meaning
must
submitted
patent
trademark
office
entirely
consistent
policy
act
accord
mark
incontestable
status
additional
five
years
continued
use
rival
contests
registration
period
reasonable
presume
initial
prima
facie
showing
distinctiveness
rebutted
proof
secondary
meaning
ever
presented
either
patent
trademark
office
simply
rational
basis
leaping
conclusion
passage
time
transformed
inherently
defective
mark
incontestable
mark
matter
dedicated
competent
administrators
may
possibility
error
always
present
especially
nonadversary
proceedings
reason
normally
assumes
congress
intended
agency
action
subject
judicial
review
unless
contrary
intent
expressed
clear
unambiguous
language
statute
congress
expressed
intent
contrary
given
courts
broadest
possible
authority
determine
validity
trademark
registrations
action
involving
registered
mark
exercise
broad
power
judicial
review
informed
legislative
purposes
motivated
enactment
lanham
act
congress
enacted
lanham
act
secure
owners
goodwill
built
without
showing
secondary
meaning
basis
upon
conclude
petitioner
built
goodwill
secured
mark
fly
fact
without
showing
secondary
meaning
presume
petitioner
business
appears
consuming
public
another
anonymous
indistinguishable
parking
lot
enacting
lanham
act
congress
also
wanted
protect
public
imposition
use
counterfeit
imitated
marks
false
trade
descriptions
upon
record
appears
danger
occurrence
practical
matter
without
showing
public
specifically
identify
petitioner
service
seems
difficult
believe
anyone
imitate
petitioner
marks
imitation
even
occurred
likely
confuse
anybody
basis
record
case
reasonable
infer
operators
parking
lots
vicinity
airports
may
make
use
words
park
fly
simply
words
provide
ready
description
businesses
rather
desire
exploit
petitioner
goodwill
public
interest
prohibiting
commercial
monopolization
phrases
park
fly
business
claims
exclusive
right
use
words
phrases
part
common
vocabulary
depart
statutorily
mandated
authority
rectify
register
absent
clear
congressional
mandate
language
even
commercial
context
properly
belongs
public
unless
congress
instructs
otherwise
case
instruction
fact
opposite
command
guides
actions
congress
clear
insistence
merely
descriptive
mark
fly
context
airport
parking
remain
public
domain
unless
secondary
meaning
proved
basic
purposes
act
unambiguous
congressional
command
merely
descriptive
mark
registered
without
prior
proof
acquired
secondary
meaning
broad
power
judicial
review
granted
combine
persuade
registrant
merely
descriptive
mark
granted
injunction
infringement
without
ever
proving
mark
acquired
secondary
meaning
ii
relies
three
different
though
unrelated
arguments
support
negative
answer
question
whether
action
enjoin
infringement
incontestable
mark
may
defended
grounds
mark
merely
descriptive
ante
language
plain
prevent
conclusion
legislative
history
indicates
congress
decided
deny
incontestable
status
merely
descriptive
marks
practical
value
incontestable
status
nullified
defense
recognized
arguments
unpersuasive
plain
language
right
use
registered
mark
become
incontestable
provides
registration
shall
conclusive
evidence
registrant
exclusive
right
use
registered
mark
read
isolation
provision
surely
lend
support
holding
indeed
isolated
literal
reading
language
seem
foreclose
nonstatutory
defense
action
enjoin
infringement
incontestable
mark
however
wisely
refuses
adopt
rigid
interpretation
examination
provisions
act
plainly
demonstrates
right
injunctive
relief
infringement
automatically
follows
achievement
incontestable
status
thus
courts
proper
jurisdiction
shall
power
grant
injunctions
according
principles
equity
upon
terms
may
deem
reasonable
registrant
establishes
violation
right
additionally
emphasizes
recovery
shall
subject
principles
equity
sections
addition
broad
power
grants
courts
action
involving
registered
mark
determine
right
registration
order
cancelation
registrations
whole
part
restore
canceled
registrations
otherwise
rectify
register
respect
registrations
party
action
moreover
well
established
injunctions
issue
matter
course
essence
equity
jurisdiction
power
chancellor
equity
particularly
important
public
interest
involved
exercising
broad
power
equity
federal
courts
certainly
take
account
tension
apparent
meaning
plain
command
act
prohibiting
registration
merely
descriptive
mark
without
proof
secondary
meaning
demonstrably
odds
intent
congress
grant
incontestable
status
mark
eligible
registration
first
place
surely
authorized
require
compliance
granting
relief
basis
legislative
history
language
expressly
demonstrates
congress
concern
granting
monopoly
privileges
merely
descriptive
marks
however
failure
include
mere
descriptiveness
laundry
list
grounds
incontestability
challenged
interpreted
today
evidence
congressional
approval
incontestable
status
merely
descriptive
marks
history
unpersuasive
perfectly
clear
failure
include
mere
descriptiveness
among
grounds
challenging
incontestability
based
understanding
mark
registered
without
showing
secondary
meaning
see
supra
read
congress
failure
equivalent
endorsement
incontestable
status
merely
descriptive
marks
without
secondary
meaning
described
perverse
practical
argument
suggests
reading
act
effectively
emasculates
circumstances
case
ante
reading
simply
require
owner
merely
descriptive
mark
prove
secondary
meaning
obtaining
benefit
incontestability
mark
fact
distinctive
applicant
goods
commerce
requires
burden
onerous
mark
secondary
meaning
burden
course
met
case
purposes
act
served
frustrated
requiring
adherence
statutory
procedure
mandated
congress
sum
petitioner
complied
time
initial
registration
able
prove
secondary
meaning
case
agree
disposition
however
subscribe
conclusion
holder
mark
registered
violation
unambiguous
statutory
command
may
rely
incontestability
enjoin
infringement
ante
see
also
ante
accordingly
respectfully
dissent
section
enumerates
seven
categories
defenses
action
enforce
incontestable
mark
see
quoted
ante
addition
defendant
free
argue
mark
never
become
incontestable
four
reasons
enumerated
moreover
expressly
provides
incontestable
mark
may
challenged
grounds
set
forth
subsections
sections
turn
incorporate
objections
registrability
defined
act
section
pertinent
part
provides
action
involving
registered
mark
may
determine
right
registration
order
cancelation
registrations
whole
part
restore
canceled
registrations
otherwise
rectify
register
respect
registrations
party
action
appeals
petitioner
argued
mark
suggestive
respect
airport
parking
lots
appeals
responded
unpersuaded
given
clarity
first
word
fly
mark
seen
context
understood
readily
consumers
offering
airport
parking
imagination
thought
perception
needed
simply
understood
park
fly
clear
concise
description
characteristic
ingredient
service
offered
customer
parks
car
flies
airport
conclude
fly
mark
used
context
airport
parking
best
merely
descriptive
mark
see
sess
conf
sess
hearing
subcommittee
house
committee
patents
statement
charles
kramer
chairman
house
committee
patents
hearings
subcommittee
senate
committee
patents
statements
lanham
testimony
daphne
robert
aba
committee
trade
mark
legislation
hearings
supra
statements
lanham
distinction
new
great
britain
enacted
statutes
provided
essence
registration
conclusive
evidence
registrant
right
exclusive
use
mark
expiration
five
years
following
registration
see
act
establish
register
trade
marks
ch
act
amend
consolidate
law
relating
patents
inventions
registration
designs
trade
marks
ch
statutes
use
word
incontestable
respects
striking
similarity
language
acts
relevant
provision
lanham
act
construe
today
noteworthy
english
judges
refused
give
statutory
language
plain
meaning
showing
made
mark
properly
registered
beginning
see
edwards
dennis
ch
jackson
napper
schmidt
pat
cas
cf
palmer
ch
although
conclusion
regarding
secondary
meaning
contained
alternative
holding
seems
clear
distinctiveness
mark
heavily
influenced
appeals
disposition
regarding
incontestability
wrote
find
difficult
believe
anyone
living
society
daily
familiarity
hundreds
products
thoroughly
acquainted
eveready
mark
perhaps
many
know
carbide
manufacturer
eveready
products
doubt
term
utilized
indicate
single
though
anonymous
source
play
ostrich
regard
general
public
knowledge
already
noted
expressly
prohibits
registration
merely
descriptive
mark
exception
prohibition
petitioner
satisfy
processing
application
reads
follows
except
expressly
excluded
paragraphs
section
nothing
chapter
shall
prevent
registration
mark
used
applicant
become
distinctive
applicant
goods
commerce
commissioner
may
accept
prima
facie
evidence
mark
become
distinctive
applied
applicant
goods
commerce
proof
substantially
exclusive
continuous
use
thereof
mark
applicant
commerce
five
years
next
preceding
date
filing
application
registration
emphasis
added
hearings
subcommittee
house
committee
patents
supra
pohl
appeared
hearings
behalf
new
york
merchants
association
committee
member
coordination
committee
recently
gerald
mossinghoff
assistant
secretary
commissioner
patents
trademarks
gave
following
testimony
congress
ne
biggest
problems
one
time
percent
million
documents
either
missing
misfiled
paper
system
set
remained
virtually
unchanged
since
time
simply
deteriorated
point
percent
documents
missing
hearing
subcommittee
patents
copyrights
trademarks
senate
committee
judiciary
one
treatise
gives
following
advice
regarding
registration
registration
principal
register
attempted
possible
matter
strategy
applicant
application
concede
term
falls
within
statutory
bars
require
proof
secondary
meaning
applicant
let
trademark
examiner
prove
term
falls
within
one
categories
since
ex
parte
application
like
contested
proceeding
applicant
federal
government
applicant
merely
await
examiner
response
possible
contention
mark
requires
proof
secondary
meaning
examiner
never
makes
contention
applicant
convinces
examiner
trademark
board
mark
fall
within
whole
problem
proof
secondary
meaning
avoided
examiner
adamant
argument
mark
falls
within
category
applicant
several
choices
may
appeal
determination
may
agree
mark
registered
supplemental
register
may
submit
proof
secondary
meaning
applicant
qualifies
registration
supplemental
register
may
thereafter
apply
register
mark
principal
register
perhaps
rely
presumption
secondary
meaning
examiner
initial
response
mark
barred
ground
inherently
distinctive
doubt
applicant
may
respond
alternative
applicant
may
argue
mark
inherently
distinctive
merely
descriptive
even
barred
ground
inherently
distinctive
mark
become
distinctive
acquisition
secondary
meaning
point
applicant
attorney
concede
weakness
mark
absolutely
necessary
object
get
mark
principal
register
soon
possible
one
way
another
mccarthy
trademarks
unfair
competition
emphasis
added
erika
dunlop
bachowski
johnson
robison
barlow
collins
abbott
laboratories
gardner
cf
stafford
briggs
look
statutory
language
objects
policy
law
construction
statute
execute
congress
true
intent
supra
ibid
respondent
raise
issue
likelihood
confusion
justifying
injunction
insofar
petitioner
present
intention
expanding
pacific
northwest
disposition
appeals
reach
issue
patent
trademark
office
handbook
explains
point
general
terms
matter
merely
describes
goods
services
applied
prohibited
registered
principal
register
first
permit
one
person
appropriate
exclusively
mark
merely
ordinary
language
describe
goods
services
involved
obviously
detrimental
others
deal
goods
service
hindering
use
normal
language
association
goods
services
second
assurance
mark
merely
describes
fact
mark
indicating
origin
since
purchasing
public
likely
recognize
descriptive
meaning
matter
accord
significance
indicating
single
source
origin
goods
services
department
commerce
patent
trademark
office
trademark
manual
examining
procedure
see
otto
roth
universal
foods
ccpa
recognizing
importance
free
use
language
trademark
context
bada
montgomery
ward
ne
competitor
permitted
impoverish
language
commerce
preventing
fellows
fairly
describing
goods
cert
denied
additionally
lanham
act
enacted
canal
clark
wall
wrote
words
still
applicable
today
owner
original
undoubted
right
protected
exclusive
use
marks
forms
symbols
appropriated
designating
true
origin
ownership
article
fabric
affixed
right
exclusive
use
words
letter
figures
symbols
relation
origin
ownership
goods
meant
indicate
name
quality
right
appropriate
sign
symbol
nature
fact
used
signify
others
may
employ
equal
truth
therefore
equal
right
employ
purpose
quoting
amoskeag
manufacturing
spear
sand
super
emphasizes
address
whether
traditional
equitable
defenses
available
action
enforce
incontestable
mark
ante
thus
chooses
rule
whether
language
ignored
defense
laches
estoppel
asserted
several
courts
indicated
defenses
allowed
see
prudential
ins
gibraltar
financial
cert
denied
cuban
cigar
brands
upmann
international
supp
sdny
aff
without
opinion
carl
zeiss
stiftung
carl
zeiss
jena
supp
sdny
modified
cert
denied
haviland
johann
haviland
china
supp
sdny
several
commentators
also
written
subject
mccarthy
trademarks
unfair
competition
one
early
article
noted
fact
section
limits
defenses
incontestable
mark
seven
specific
issues
possibly
conclusive
difficult
imagine
equity
granting
injunctive
relief
registrant
comes
unclean
hands
even
though
defendant
unable
establish
one
seven
specific
defenses
listed
section
equitable
doctrines
laches
estoppel
probably
also
preclude
injunction
damages
case
incontestable
mark
however
always
possibility
courts
might
give
act
strict
technical
construction
precluding
defense
except
specifically
enumerated
diggins
lanham
act
geo
weinberger
hecht
bowles
porter
warner
holding
morton
salt
suppiger
ourts
equity
may
appropriately
withhold
aid
plaintiff
using
right
asserted
contrary
public
interest
virginian
railway
employees
griffin
oceanic
contractors
see
also
garcia
ante
stevens
dissenting
fidelity
federal
savings
loan
assn
de
la
cuesta
parts
statute
given
effect
possible
american
textile
manufacturers
institute
donovan
reiter
sonotone
construing
statute
obliged
give
effect
possible
every
word
congress
used
moreover
even
owner
registered
mark
may
enjoin
infringement
true
registration
become
meaningless
see
ante
registration
may
used
prevent
importation
goods
bearing
infringing
marks
country
see
additionally
registration
country
prerequisite
registration
foreign
countries
seidel
general
practitioner
know
trademarks
copyrights
ed
vandenburgh
trademark
law
procedure
ed
customs
patent
appeals
opinion
recognizing
congress
expressed
desire
scandalous
matter
registered
wrote
following
regarding
benefits
registration
registration
granted
responsibilities
government
respect
mark
ended
benefits
registration
part
government
assistance
include
public
notice
mark
official
government
publication
official
records
distributed
throughout
world
maintenance
permanent
public
records
concerning
mark
availability
customs
service
blocking
importation
infringing
goods
access
federal
courts
presumption
validity
registration
notices
registrant
concerning
maintenance
registration
extent
direct
government
protection
mark
pto
searches
records
refuses
registration
others
conflicting
marks
apart
nominal
fees
costs
underwritten
public
funds
robert
mcginley