batchelder
argued
april
decided
june
respondent
found
guilty
violating
part
title
iv
omnibus
crime
control
safe
streets
act
act
provision
prohibits
previously
convicted
felons
receiving
firearm
traveled
interstate
commerce
district
sentenced
respondent
five
years
imprisonment
maximum
term
authorized
violation
appeals
affirmed
conviction
remanded
resentencing
noting
substantive
elements
app
contained
title
vii
act
identical
applied
convicted
felon
unlawfully
receives
firearm
interpreted
act
allow
maximum
sentence
provided
held
defendant
convicted
violating
properly
sentenced
even
though
conduct
also
violates
pp
nothing
language
structure
legislative
history
act
suggests
overlap
defendant
convicted
may
imprisoned
maximum
term
specified
rather
substantive
statute
conjunction
sentencing
provision
operates
independently
pp
appeals
erroneously
relied
three
principles
statutory
interpretation
construing
override
penalties
authorized
doctrine
ambiguities
criminal
statutes
must
resolved
favor
lenity
applicable
since
ambiguity
resolve
interpreted
implicitly
repealing
whenever
defendant
conduct
might
violate
sections
legislative
intent
repeal
must
manifest
positive
repugnancy
provisions
borden
case
penalty
provisions
fully
capable
coexisting
apply
convictions
different
statutes
finally
maxim
statutes
construed
avoid
constitutional
questions
offers
assistance
since
principle
applies
alternative
interpretation
fairly
possible
language
statute
simply
basis
act
reading
term
five
mean
two
pp
statutory
provisions
issue
void
vagueness
unambiguously
specify
activity
proscribed
penalties
available
upon
conviction
although
statutes
create
uncertainty
crime
may
charged
therefore
penalties
may
imposed
greater
extent
single
statute
authorizing
alternative
punishments
long
overlapping
criminal
provisions
clearly
define
conduct
prohibited
punishment
authorized
notice
requirements
due
process
clause
satisfied
statutes
unconstitutional
equal
protection
component
due
process
clause
fifth
amendment
theory
allow
prosecutor
unfettered
discretion
selecting
two
penalties
apply
prosecutor
discretion
choose
unfettered
selectivity
enforcement
criminal
laws
subject
constitutional
constraints
whether
prosecute
charge
file
bring
grand
jury
decisions
generally
rest
prosecutor
discretion
defendant
constitutional
right
elect
two
applicable
federal
statutes
shall
basis
indictment
prosecution
neither
entitled
choose
penalty
scheme
sentenced
pp
statutes
unconstitutional
impermissibly
delegating
executive
branch
legislature
responsibility
fix
criminal
penalties
clearly
informed
courts
prosecutors
defendants
permissible
punishment
alternatives
available
statute
congress
fulfilled
duty
pp
marshall
delivered
opinion
unanimous
andrew
levander
argued
cause
pro
hac
vice
brief
solicitor
general
mccree
assistant
attorney
general
heymann
deputy
solicitor
general
frey
sidney
glazer
frank
marine
charles
bellows
argued
cause
respondent
brief
jason
bellows
carole
bellows
justice
marshall
delivered
opinion
issue
case
two
overlapping
provisions
omnibus
crime
control
safe
streets
act
omnibus
act
prohibit
convicted
felons
receiving
firearms
authorizes
different
maximum
penalties
must
determine
whether
defendant
convicted
offense
carrying
greater
penalty
may
sentenced
lenient
provision
conduct
violates
statutes
respondent
previously
convicted
felon
found
guilty
receiving
firearm
traveled
interstate
commerce
violation
district
sentenced
five
years
imprisonment
maximum
term
authorized
violation
appeals
affirmed
conviction
divided
vote
remanded
resentencing
majority
recognized
respondent
indicted
convicted
permits
five
years
imprisonment
violations
however
noting
substantive
elements
app
identical
applied
convicted
felon
unlawfully
receives
firearm
interpreted
omnibus
act
allow
maximum
sentence
provided
holding
appeals
relied
three
principles
statutory
construction
view
arguably
contradict
ory
penalty
provisions
similar
conduct
inconclusive
legislative
history
raised
doubt
whether
congress
intended
two
penalty
provisions
first
applied
doctrine
ambiguities
criminal
legislation
resolved
favor
defendant
second
determined
since
congress
last
word
issue
penalty
may
implicitly
repealed
punishment
provisions
acknowledging
first
two
principles
applied
facts
without
difficulty
majority
also
invoked
maxim
possible
interpret
statute
avoid
constitutional
questions
reasoned
prosecutor
power
select
one
two
statutes
identical
except
penalty
provisions
implicated
important
constitutional
protections
dissent
found
basis
omnibus
act
legislative
history
engrafting
penalty
provisions
onto
relying
long
line
cases
hold
act
may
violate
one
criminal
statute
government
may
elect
prosecute
either
even
defendant
risks
harsher
penalty
long
prosecutor
discriminate
class
defendants
dissent
concluded
statutory
scheme
constitutional
granted
certiorari
reverse
judgment
vacating
respondent
prison
sentence
ii
previously
noted
partial
redundancy
conduct
proscribe
individuals
reach
see
bass
however
find
nothing
language
structure
legislative
history
omnibus
act
suggest
overlap
defendant
convicted
may
imprisoned
maximum
term
specified
read
act
substantive
statute
conjunction
sentencing
provision
operates
independently
section
contained
title
iv
omnibus
act
prohibits
four
categories
individuals
receiving
firearm
ammunition
shipped
transported
interstate
foreign
commerce
see
supra
persons
violate
title
iv
subject
penalties
provided
authorizes
maximum
fine
imprisonment
five
years
see
supra
section
located
title
vii
omnibus
act
forbids
five
categories
individuals
receiv
ing
possess
ing
transport
ing
commerce
affecting
commerce
firearm
section
authorizes
maximum
fine
imprisonment
two
years
see
supra
prohibit
convicted
felons
petitioner
receiving
firearms
title
unambiguously
specifies
penalties
available
enforce
substantive
proscriptions
section
applies
without
exception
hoever
violates
provision
title
iv
patently
provision
see
ch
stat
similarly
title
vii
substantive
prohibitions
penalties
enumerated
penalty
scheme
encompasses
criminal
prosecutions
brought
provision
face
statutes
thus
establish
alone
delimits
appropriate
punishment
violations
congress
intended
enact
two
independent
gun
control
statutes
fully
enforceable
terms
confirmed
legislative
history
omnibus
act
section
derived
federal
firearms
act
stat
act
stat
authorized
maximum
prison
term
title
iv
omnibus
act
merely
recodified
modification
carefully
constructed
package
gun
control
legislation
existence
many
years
scarborough
see
bass
supra
contrast
title
vii
floor
amendment
hastily
passed
little
discussion
hearings
report
bass
supra
see
scarborough
supra
meager
legislative
debates
involving
amendment
demonstrate
intention
alter
terms
title
iv
immediately
senate
passed
title
vii
senator
dodd
inquired
whether
substitute
title
iv
cong
rec
senator
long
sponsor
amendment
replied
take
nothing
merely
add
title
iv
cong
rec
similarly
although
title
vii
received
passing
mention
house
discussions
bill
representative
machen
made
clear
amendment
complement
legislation
contained
title
iv
legislators
intended
title
iv
cases
overlap
presumably
indicated
purpose
title
vii
complement
title
iv
see
scarborough
supra
discussions
together
language
structure
omnibus
act
evince
congress
clear
understanding
two
titles
applied
independently
construing
override
penalties
authorized
appeals
relied
believe
erroneously
three
principles
statutory
interpretation
first
invoked
doctrine
ambiguities
criminal
statutes
must
resolved
favor
lenity
rewis
bass
culbert
naftalin
dunn
ante
although
principle
construction
applies
sentencing
well
substantive
provisions
see
simpson
instant
case
ambiguity
resolve
respondent
unquestionably
violated
unquestionably
permits
five
years
imprisonment
violation
provides
different
penalties
essentially
conduct
justification
taking
liberties
unequivocal
statutory
language
see
barrett
express
terms
limits
penalty
scheme
exclusively
convictions
obtained
provision
congress
conveyed
purpose
clearly
decline
manufacture
ambiguity
none
exists
culbert
supra
interpreted
implicitly
repealing
whenever
defendant
conduct
might
violate
titles
enough
show
two
statutes
produce
differing
results
applied
factual
situation
radzanower
touche
ross
rather
legislative
intent
repeal
must
manifest
positive
repugnancy
provisions
borden
case
however
penalty
provisions
fully
capable
coexisting
apply
convictions
different
statutes
finally
maxim
statutes
construed
avoid
constitutional
questions
offers
assistance
cardinal
principle
statutory
construction
appropriate
alternative
interpretation
fairly
possible
language
statute
swain
pressley
see
crowell
benson
sullivan
shapiro
simply
unable
discern
basis
omnibus
act
reading
term
five
mean
two
iii
resolving
statutory
question
majority
expressed
serious
doubts
constitutionality
two
statutes
provide
different
penalties
identical
conduct
omitted
specifically
suggested
statutes
might
void
vagueness
implicate
due
process
equal
protection
interest
avoiding
excessive
prosecutorial
discretion
obtaining
equal
justice
constitute
impermissible
delegation
congressional
authority
find
constitutional
infirmities
fundamental
tenet
due
process
one
may
required
peril
life
liberty
property
speculate
meaning
penal
statutes
lanzetta
new
jersey
criminal
statute
therefore
invalid
fails
give
person
ordinary
intelligence
fair
notice
contemplated
conduct
forbidden
harriss
see
connally
general
construction
papachristou
jacksonville
dunn
ante
vague
sentencing
provisions
may
pose
constitutional
questions
state
sufficient
clarity
consequences
violating
given
criminal
statute
see
evans
brown
cf
giaccio
pennsylvania
provisions
issue
however
unambiguously
specify
activity
proscribed
penalties
available
upon
conviction
see
supra
particular
conduct
may
violate
titles
detract
notice
afforded
although
statutes
create
uncertainty
crime
may
charged
therefore
penalties
may
imposed
greater
extent
single
statute
authorizing
various
alternative
punishments
long
overlapping
criminal
provisions
clearly
define
conduct
prohibited
punishment
authorized
notice
requirements
due
process
clause
satisfied
long
recognized
act
violates
one
criminal
statute
government
may
prosecute
either
long
discriminate
class
defendants
see
beacon
brass
rosenberg
clark
concurring
joined
five
members
oyler
boles
sec
national
securities
naftalin
whether
prosecute
charge
file
bring
grand
jury
decisions
generally
rest
prosecutor
discretion
see
confiscation
cases
wall
nixon
bordenkircher
hayes
appeals
acknowledged
settled
rule
allowing
prosecutorial
choice
nevertheless
relying
dissenting
opinion
berra
distinguished
overlapping
statutes
identical
standards
proof
provisions
vary
particular
view
two
statutes
prohibit
exactly
conduct
prosecutor
selection
two
penalties
apply
unfettered
prosecutorial
discretion
produce
unequal
justice
expressed
doubt
form
legislative
redundancy
constitutional
find
analysis
factually
legally
unsound
contrary
appeals
assertions
prosecutor
discretion
choose
unfettered
selectivity
enforcement
criminal
laws
course
subject
constitutional
constraints
decision
proceed
empower
government
predetermine
ultimate
criminal
sanctions
rather
merely
enables
sentencing
judge
impose
longer
prison
sentence
permit
precludes
imposing
greater
fine
authorized
importantly
appreciable
difference
discretion
prosecutor
exercises
deciding
whether
charge
one
two
statutes
different
elements
discretion
exercises
choosing
one
two
statutes
identical
elements
former
situation
determines
proof
support
conviction
either
statute
decision
indistinguishable
one
faces
latter
context
prosecutor
may
influenced
penalties
available
upon
conviction
fact
standing
alone
give
rise
violation
equal
protection
due
process
clause
cf
rosenberg
supra
clark
concurring
oyler
boles
supra
defendant
constitutional
right
elect
two
applicable
federal
statutes
shall
basis
indictment
prosecution
neither
entitled
choose
penalty
scheme
sentenced
see
art
ii
nixon
supra
approaching
problem
prosecutorial
discretion
slightly
different
perspective
appeals
postulated
statutes
might
impermissibly
delegate
executive
branch
legislature
responsibility
fix
criminal
penalties
see
hudson
cranch
grimaud
evans
agree
provisions
issue
plainly
demarcate
range
penalties
prosecutors
judges
may
seek
impose
light
specificity
power
congress
delegated
officials
broader
authority
routinely
exercise
enforcing
criminal
laws
informed
courts
prosecutors
defendants
permissible
punishment
alternatives
available
title
congress
fulfilled
duty
see
evans
supra
accordingly
judgment
appeals
reversed
footnotes
pertinent
part
provides
shall
unlawful
person
indictment
convicted
crime
punishable
imprisonment
term
exceeding
one
year
fugitive
justice
unlawful
user
addicted
marihuana
depressant
stimulant
drug
narcotic
drug
adjudicated
mental
defective
committed
mental
institution
receive
firearm
ammunition
shipped
transported
interstate
foreign
commerce
title
provides
relevant
part
whoever
violates
provision
chapter
shall
fined
imprisoned
five
years
shall
become
eligible
parole
board
parole
shall
determine
section
person
convicted
state
political
subdivision
thereof
felony
discharged
armed
forces
dishonorable
conditions
adjudged
state
political
subdivision
thereof
mentally
incompetent
citizen
renounced
citizenship
alien
illegally
unlawfully
receives
possesses
transports
commerce
affecting
commerce
date
enactment
act
firearm
shall
fined
imprisoned
two
years
app
even
case
convicted
felons
however
two
statutes
coextensive
example
title
vii
defines
felony
offense
punishable
imprisonment
term
exceeding
one
year
include
offense
one
involving
firearm
explosive
classified
misdemeanor
laws
state
punishable
term
imprisonment
two
years
less
app
federal
state
offenses
pertaining
antitrust
violations
unfair
trade
practices
restraints
trade
similar
offenses
relating
regulation
business
practices
state
offense
one
involving
firearm
explosive
classified
laws
state
misdemeanor
punishable
term
imprisonment
two
years
less
four
months
enacting
omnibus
act
congress
amended
titles
iv
vii
part
gun
control
act
stat
latter
act
also
treats
provisions
titles
iv
vii
independent
title
gun
control
act
amended
title
iv
compare
stat
stat
title
iii
gun
control
act
amended
title
vii
compare
stat
stat
accompanying
legislative
reports
nowhere
indicate
sentencing
scheme
govern
convictions
see
conf
anomalies
created
appeals
decision
suggest
congress
must
intended
penalties
specified
apply
violations
example
person
received
firearm
indictment
murder
subject
five
years
imprisonment
since
includes
indictment
felony
received
firearm
conviction
however
term
imprisonment
exceed
two
years
similarly
alone
proscribes
receipt
ammunition
felon
obtained
single
bullet
receive
sentence
receipt
firearm
punishable
two
years
imprisonment
addition
appeals
analysis
leaves
uncertain
result
obtain
sentencing
judge
wished
impose
maximum
prison
sentence
maximum
fine
conduct
violative
titles
doctrine
lenity
suggest
maximum
maximum
apply
however
doctrine
implied
repeal
controls
arguably
fine
authorized
imposed
violation
see
infra
berra
involved
two
tax
evasion
statutes
interpreted
proscribing
identical
conduct
defendant
charged
convicted
felony
provision
argued
jury
instructed
misdemeanor
offense
well
rejected
contention
refused
consider
whether
defendant
sentence
invalid
excess
maximum
authorized
misdemeanor
statute
dissent
urged
permitting
prosecutor
control
whether
particular
act
punished
misdemeanor
felony
raised
serious
constitutional
questions
equal
protection
clause
prohibits
selective
enforcement
based
upon
unjustifiable
standard
race
religion
arbitrary
classification
oyler
boles
respondent
allege
prosecution
motivated
improper
considerations