lovasco
argued
decided
june
months
federal
criminal
offenses
alleged
occurred
respondent
indicated
committing
beyond
investigative
report
made
month
crimes
committed
little
additional
information
developed
following
months
claiming
preindictment
delay
material
defense
testimony
lost
deprived
due
process
respondent
moved
dismiss
indictment
district
found
delay
explained
justified
unnecessary
prejudicial
respondent
granted
motion
dismiss
appeals
affirmed
concluding
delay
found
solely
attributable
government
hope
participants
crime
discovered
unjustified
held
appeals
erred
affirming
district
dismissal
indictment
pp
although
speedy
trial
clause
sixth
amendment
applicable
person
accused
crime
statutes
limitations
provide
primary
guarantee
bringing
overly
stale
criminal
charges
marion
statutes
fully
define
defendant
rights
respect
events
antedating
indictment
due
process
clause
limited
role
play
protecting
oppressive
delay
pp
proof
prejudice
makes
due
process
claim
ripe
adjudication
automatically
validate
claim
reasons
delay
must
also
considered
pp
prosecute
defendant
following
investigative
delay
apparently
existed
case
deprive
due
process
even
defense
might
somewhat
prejudiced
lapse
time
prosecutors
duty
file
charges
soon
probable
cause
exists
satisfied
able
establish
suspect
guilt
beyond
reasonable
doubt
constitutional
requirement
charges
must
filed
sufficient
evidence
prove
guilt
investigation
complete
immediate
arrest
indictment
might
impair
prosecutors
ability
continue
investigation
obtain
additional
indictments
pressure
prosecutors
resolving
doubtful
cases
favor
early
possibly
unwarranted
prosecutions
preclude
full
consideration
desirability
prosecuting
particular
cases
pp
marshall
delivered
opinion
burger
brennan
stewart
white
blackmun
powell
rehnquist
joined
stevens
filed
dissenting
opinion
post
john
rupp
argued
cause
brief
solicitor
general
bork
assistant
attorney
general
thornburgh
deputy
solicitor
general
frey
jerome
feit
robert
plaxico
louis
gilden
argued
cause
filed
brief
respondent
justice
marshall
delivered
opinion
granted
certiorari
case
consider
circumstances
constitution
requires
indictment
dismissed
delay
commission
offense
initiation
prosecution
march
respondent
indicted
possessing
eight
firearms
stolen
mails
dealing
firearms
without
license
offenses
alleged
occurred
july
august
months
indictment
filed
respondent
moved
dismiss
indictment
due
delay
district
conducted
hearing
respondent
motion
respondent
sought
prove
delay
unnecessary
prejudiced
defense
effort
establish
former
proposition
respondent
presented
postal
inspector
report
investigation
prepared
one
month
crimes
committed
stipulation
concerning
progress
probe
report
stated
brief
within
first
month
investigation
respondent
admitted
government
agents
possessed
sold
five
stolen
guns
agents
developed
strong
evidence
linking
respondent
remaining
three
weapons
report
also
stated
however
agents
unable
confirm
refute
respondent
claim
found
guns
car
returned
visiting
son
mail
handler
work
stipulation
assistant
attorney
entered
indicated
little
additional
information
concerning
crimes
uncovered
months
following
preparation
inspector
report
establish
prejudice
defense
respondent
testified
lost
testimony
two
material
witnesses
due
delay
first
witness
tom
stewart
died
year
alleged
crimes
occurred
hearing
respondent
claimed
stewart
source
two
three
guns
second
witness
respondent
brother
died
april
eight
months
crimes
completed
respondent
testified
brother
present
respondent
called
stewart
secure
guns
witnessed
respondent
sales
respondent
state
witnesses
aided
defense
willing
testify
government
made
systematic
effort
district
explain
long
delay
assistant
attorney
expressly
disagree
however
defense
counsel
suggestion
investigation
ended
postal
inspector
report
prepared
app
prosecutor
also
stated
government
theory
respondent
son
access
mail
terminal
guns
possibly
stolen
responsible
thefts
finally
prosecutor
elicited
somewhat
cryptic
testimony
postal
inspector
indicating
case
particular
weapons
involves
individuals
information
presented
grand
jury
regard
case
day
indictment
spoken
prosecutors
case
four
five
occasions
following
hearing
district
filed
brief
opinion
order
found
october
date
postal
inspector
report
government
information
relating
defendant
alleged
commission
offenses
charged
delay
case
presented
grand
jury
explained
justified
unnecessary
unreasonable
also
found
result
delay
defendant
prejudiced
reason
death
tom
stewart
material
witness
behalf
pet
cert
accordingly
dismissed
indictment
government
appealed
appeals
eighth
circuit
brief
government
explained
months
inaction
stating
legitimate
government
interest
keeping
investigation
open
instant
case
defendant
son
worked
terminal
railroad
access
mail
government
position
son
responsible
theft
therefore
investigation
establish
fact
important
although
investigation
continue
full
time
basis
contact
attorney
office
postal
inspector
office
throughout
certain
matters
brought
federal
grand
jury
prior
determination
case
presented
indictment
brief
pp
granted
certiorari
reverse
ii
marion
considered
significance
constitutional
purposes
lengthy
preindictment
delay
held
far
speedy
trial
clause
sixth
amendment
concerned
delay
wholly
irrelevant
since
analysis
language
history
purposes
clause
persuaded
us
formal
indictment
information
else
actual
restraints
imposed
arrest
holding
answer
criminal
charge
engage
particular
protections
provision
went
note
statutes
limitations
provide
predictable
legislatively
enacted
limits
prosecutorial
delay
provide
primary
guarantee
bringing
overly
stale
criminal
charges
quoting
ewell
acknowledge
statute
limitations
fully
define
defendants
rights
respect
events
occurring
prior
indictment
due
process
clause
limited
role
play
protecting
oppressive
delay
respondent
seems
argue
due
process
bars
prosecution
whenever
defendant
suffers
prejudice
result
preindictment
delay
support
proposition
respondent
relies
concluding
sentence
opinion
marion
remanding
case
stated
vents
trial
may
demonstrate
actual
prejudice
present
time
appellees
due
process
claims
speculative
premature
quoted
sentence
establishes
proof
actual
prejudice
makes
due
process
claim
concrete
ripe
adjudication
makes
claim
automatically
valid
indeed
two
pages
earlier
opinion
expressly
rejected
argument
respondent
advances
need
determine
circumstances
actual
prejudice
resulting
preaccusation
delays
requires
dismissal
prosecution
actual
prejudice
defense
criminal
case
may
result
shortest
necessary
delay
one
suggests
every
detriment
defendant
case
abort
criminal
prosecution
footnotes
omitted
appeals
found
sole
reason
delay
hope
part
government
others
might
discovered
may
participated
theft
concluded
hope
justify
delay
therefore
affirmed
dismissal
indictment
due
process
clause
permit
courts
abort
criminal
prosecutions
simply
disagree
prosecutor
judgment
seek
indictment
judges
free
defining
due
process
impose
law
enforcement
officials
personal
private
notions
fairness
disregard
limits
bind
judges
judicial
function
rochin
california
task
circumscribed
determine
whether
action
complained
compelling
respondent
stand
trial
government
delayed
indictment
investigate
violates
fundamental
conceptions
justice
lie
base
civil
political
institutions
mooney
holohan
define
community
sense
fair
play
decency
rochin
california
supra
see
also
ham
south
carolina
lisenba
california
hebert
louisiana
hurtado
california
requires
extended
argument
establish
prosecutors
deviate
fundamental
conceptions
justice
defer
seeking
indictments
probable
cause
believe
accused
guilty
indeed
unprofessional
conduct
prosecutor
recommend
indictment
less
probable
cause
equally
obvious
prosecutors
duty
file
charges
soon
probable
cause
exists
satisfied
able
establish
suspect
guilt
beyond
reasonable
doubt
impose
duty
deleterious
effect
upon
rights
accused
upon
ability
society
protect
ewell
supra
perspective
potential
defendants
requiring
prosecutions
commence
probable
cause
established
undesirable
increase
likelihood
unwarranted
charges
filed
add
time
defendants
stand
accused
untried
costs
means
insubstantial
since
recognized
marion
formal
accusation
may
interfere
defendant
liberty
disrupt
employment
drain
financial
resources
curtail
associations
subject
public
obloquy
create
anxiety
family
friends
perspective
law
enforcement
officials
requirement
immediate
prosecution
upon
probable
cause
equally
unacceptable
make
obtaining
proof
guilt
beyond
reasonable
doubt
impossible
causing
potentially
fruitful
sources
information
evaporate
fully
exploited
standpoint
courts
requirement
unwise
cause
scarce
resources
consumed
cases
prove
insubstantial
involve
responsible
parties
criminal
acts
thus
one
interests
well
served
compelling
prosecutors
initiate
prosecutions
soon
legally
entitled
might
argued
government
assembled
sufficient
evidence
prove
guilt
beyond
reasonable
doubt
constitutionally
required
file
charges
promptly
even
investigation
entire
criminal
transaction
complete
adopting
rule
however
many
consequences
adopting
rule
requiring
immediate
prosecution
upon
probable
cause
first
compelling
prosecutor
file
public
charges
soon
requisite
proof
developed
one
participant
one
charge
cause
numerous
problems
cases
criminal
transaction
involves
one
person
one
illegal
act
instances
immediate
arrest
indictment
impair
prosecutor
ability
continue
investigation
thereby
preventing
society
bringing
lawbreakers
justice
cases
prosecutor
able
obtain
additional
indictments
despite
early
prosecution
necessary
result
multiple
trials
involving
single
set
facts
trials
place
needless
burdens
defendants
law
enforcement
officials
courts
second
insisting
immediate
prosecution
sufficient
evidence
developed
obtain
conviction
pressure
prosecutors
resolving
doubtful
cases
favor
early
possibly
unwarranted
prosecutions
determination
evidence
available
prosecution
sufficient
obtain
conviction
seldom
reasonable
persons
often
reach
conflicting
conclusions
instant
case
example
since
respondent
admitted
possessing
least
five
firearms
primary
factual
issue
dispute
whether
respondent
knew
guns
stolen
required
surprisingly
postal
inspector
report
contained
direct
evidence
bearing
issue
decision
whether
prosecute
therefore
required
necessarily
subjective
evaluation
strength
circumstantial
evidence
available
credibility
respondent
denial
even
prosecutor
concluded
case
weak
investigation
appropriate
assurance
reviewing
agree
avoid
risk
subsequent
indictment
dismissed
preindictment
delay
prosecutor
might
feel
constrained
file
premature
charges
disadvantages
entail
finally
requiring
government
make
charging
decisions
immediately
upon
assembling
evidence
sufficient
establish
guilt
preclude
government
giving
full
consideration
desirability
prosecuting
particular
cases
decision
file
criminal
charges
awesome
consequences
entails
requires
consideration
wide
range
factors
addition
strength
government
case
order
determine
whether
prosecution
public
interest
prosecutors
often
need
information
proof
suspect
guilt
therefore
deciding
whether
seek
indictment
instant
case
provides
useful
illustration
although
proof
identity
mail
thieves
necessary
convict
respondent
possessory
crimes
charged
might
crucial
assessing
respondent
culpability
distinguished
legal
guilt
example
investigation
show
respondent
role
advance
knowledge
theft
simply
agreed
paternal
loyalty
help
son
dispose
guns
respondent
discovered
son
stolen
attorney
might
decided
prosecute
especially
since
time
crime
respondent
years
old
prior
criminal
record
requiring
prosecution
evidence
guilt
clear
however
prevent
prosecutor
awaiting
information
necessary
decision
reluctant
adopt
rule
consequences
absent
clear
constitutional
command
find
command
due
process
clause
fifth
amendment
view
investigative
delay
fundamentally
unlike
delay
undertaken
government
solely
gain
tactical
advantage
accused
marion
precisely
investigative
delay
rather
deviating
elementary
standards
fair
play
decency
prosecutor
abides
refuses
seek
indictments
completely
satisfied
prosecute
able
promptly
establish
guilt
beyond
reasonable
doubt
penalizing
prosecutors
defer
action
reasons
subordinate
goal
orderly
expedition
mere
speed
smith
due
process
clause
require
therefore
hold
prosecute
defendant
following
investigative
delay
deprive
due
process
even
defense
might
somewhat
prejudiced
lapse
time
present
case
appeals
stated
reason
government
postponed
action
await
results
additional
investigation
although
unfortunately
evidence
concerning
reasons
delay
record
finding
supported
prosecutor
implicit
representation
district
explicit
representation
appeals
investigation
continued
time
government
deferred
taking
action
respondent
finding
moreover
buttressed
government
repeated
assertions
petition
certiorari
brief
oral
argument
delay
caused
government
efforts
identify
persons
addition
respondent
may
participated
offenses
pet
cert
must
assume
statements
counsel
made
good
faith
light
explanation
follows
compelling
respondent
stand
trial
fundamentally
unfair
appeals
therefore
erred
affirming
district
decision
dismissing
indictment
iii
marion
conceded
determine
abstract
circumstances
preaccusation
delay
require
dismissing
prosecutions
five
years
later
statement
remains
true
indeed
intervening
years
defendants
established
prejudiced
delay
neither
lower
sustained
opportunity
consider
constitutional
significance
various
reasons
delay
therefore
leave
lower
courts
first
instance
task
applying
settled
principles
due
process
discussed
particular
circumstances
individual
cases
simply
hold
case
lower
courts
erred
dismissing
indictment
reversed
footnotes
contrary
evidence
came
respondent
purchaser
told
government
investigators
knew
guns
hot
march
inspector
learned
another
person
claimed
purchased
gun
respondent
app
hearing
parties
disagreed
whether
evidence
admissible
since
involve
guns
indictment
related
event
assistant
attorney
stated
decision
prosecute
made
additional
piece
evidence
received
respondent
admitted
mentioned
stewart
postal
inspector
questioned
source
guns
explained
stewart
bad
tomato
liable
take
shot
told
respondent
also
conceded
mention
either
brother
stewart
illness
death
postal
inspector
several
occasions
respondent
called
inspector
inquire
status
probe
inspector
report
stated
evidence
establishing
son
responsibility
thefts
unanimously
reversed
dismissal
fourth
count
indictment
charging
respondent
dealing
firearms
without
license
since
respondent
alleged
missing
witnesses
provided
exculpatory
evidence
charge
addition
challenging
appeals
holding
constitutional
issue
argues
district
deferred
action
motion
dismiss
trial
time
assessed
prejudice
respondent
light
events
trial
argument
however
raised
district
appeals
absent
exceptional
circumstances
review
see
duignan
neely
martin
eby
constr
oral
argument
government
seemed
suggest
failure
raise
procedural
question
brief
appeals
excused
proceedings
skewed
fact
district
based
dismissal
solely
fed
rule
crim
proc
issue
raised
government
petition
rehearing
tr
oral
arg
even
assuming
basis
district
dismissal
skewed
appellate
proceedings
regarding
procedural
question
fact
opening
paragraph
argument
government
brief
recognized
issue
due
process
question
remainder
brief
treated
question
merits
even
appeals
issued
decision
based
solely
due
process
clause
government
petition
rehearing
squarely
raise
procedural
issue
alternative
ground
rehearing
case
en
banc
marion
also
holds
fed
rule
crim
proc
permits
district
courts
dismiss
indictments
due
preindictment
postindictment
delay
limited
situations
since
respondent
arrested
indicted
district
plainly
erred
basing
decision
rule
aba
code
professional
responsibility
dr
aba
project
standards
criminal
justice
prosecution
function
app
draft
extent
period
accusation
trial
strictly
limited
legislative
action
see
speedy
trial
act
stat
et
seq
supp
compelling
immediate
prosecutions
upon
probable
cause
add
time
defendants
stand
accused
create
risk
guilty
persons
escaping
punishment
simply
government
unable
move
probable
cause
guilt
beyond
reasonable
doubt
short
time
available
even
absent
statute
course
speedy
trial
clause
sixth
amendment
imposes
restraints
length
delay
cf
watson
powell
concurring
good
police
practice
often
requires
postponing
arrest
even
probable
cause
established
order
place
suspect
surveillance
otherwise
develop
evidence
necessary
prove
guilt
jury
defendants
also
adversely
affected
trials
involving
less
criminal
acts
responsible
since
likely
subjected
multiple
trials
growing
transaction
occurrence
see
also
hoffa
quoted
marion
constitutional
right
arrested
police
required
guess
peril
precise
moment
probable
cause
arrest
suspect
risking
violation
fourth
amendment
act
soon
violation
sixth
amendment
wait
long
law
enforcement
officers
constitutional
duty
call
halt
criminal
investigation
moment
minimum
evidence
establish
probable
cause
quantum
evidence
may
fall
far
short
amount
necessary
support
criminal
conviction
addition
courts
required
decide
every
case
prosecution
commenced
necessary
trace
progress
investigation
maintaining
daily
records
impose
administrative
burden
prosecutors
reviewing
place
even
greater
burden
courts
see
also
marion
supra
see
prosecution
function
supra
prosecutor
obliged
present
charges
evidence
might
support
prosecutor
may
circumstances
good
cause
consistent
public
interest
decline
prosecute
notwithstanding
evidence
may
exist
support
conviction
illustrative
factors
prosecutor
may
properly
consider
exercising
discretion
prosecutor
reasonable
doubt
accused
fact
guilty
ii
extent
harm
caused
offense
iii
disproportion
authorized
punishment
relation
particular
offense
offender
iv
possible
improper
motives
complainant
reluctance
victim
testify
vi
cooperation
accused
apprehension
conviction
others
vii
availability
likelihood
prosecution
another
jurisdiction
course
case
investigation
proved
unavailing
attorney
ultimately
decided
prosecute
based
solely
inspector
report
fortuity
transform
otherwise
permissible
delay
impermissible
one
marion
noted
approval
government
conceded
tactical
delay
violate
due
process
clause
government
renews
concession
brief
expands
somewhat
stating
due
process
violation
might
also
made
upon
showing
prosecutorial
delay
incurred
reckless
disregard
circumstances
known
prosecution
suggesting
existed
appreciable
risk
delay
impair
ability
mount
effective
defense
government
notes
however
evidence
recklessness
see
also
pet
cert
brief
tr
oral
arg
professor
amsterdam
catalogued
noninvestigative
reasons
delay
roof
offense
may
depend
upon
testimony
undercover
informer
maintains
cover
period
time
surfacing
file
charges
one
persons
dealt
disguised
one
possible
charge
suspect
may
held
back
pending
disposition
others
order
avoid
burden
upon
prosecutor
office
handling
charges
may
turn
unnecessary
obtain
degree
punishment
prosecutor
seeks
many
motives
delay
course
including
sinister
ones
desire
postpone
beginning
defense
investigation
wish
hold
club
defendant
additional
reasons
delay
may
partly
completely
beyond
control
prosecuting
authorities
offenses
may
immediately
reported
investigation
may
immediately
identify
offender
identified
offender
may
immediately
apprehendable
indictment
may
delayed
weeks
even
months
impaneling
next
grand
jury
customary
think
delays
natural
inevitable
various
prosecutorial
decisions
assignment
manpower
priorities
among
investigations
known
offenses
may
also
affect
length
delays
speedy
criminal
trial
rights
remedies
stan
rev
see
also
dickey
florida
brennan
concurring
justice
stevens
dissenting
record
presented
question
decides
today
join
opinion
unable
believe
review
limited
facts
disclosed
record
developed
district
traditional
scope
review
exercised
regard
issues
fact
thorough
hearing
respondent
motion
dismiss
indictment
prejudicial
preindictment
delay
hearing
sides
given
every
opportunity
submit
evidence
concerning
question
district
found
government
delay
ha
explained
justified
unnecessary
unreasonable
appeal
appeals
concurred
noting
district
determination
supported
evidence
concurrent
findings
fact
make
improper
judgment
make
determination
government
postponed
action
await
results
additional
investigation
ante
determination
supported
record
majority
opinion
correctly
points
evidence
concerning
reasons
delay
record
yet
proceeds
accept
fact
representations
government
briefs
appeals
delay
caused
government
efforts
identify
persons
addition
respondent
may
participated
offenses
ibid
finding
continuing
investigation
forms
foundation
majority
opinion
comes
statements
counsel
made
appellate
process
said
unsworn
statements
part
record
therefore
considered
trial
manifestly
statements
properly
considered
us
disposition
case
adickes
kress
question
good
faith
government
counsel
business
appellate
courts
make
decisions
basis
unsworn
matter
incorporated
formal
record
findings
district
approved
appeals
establish
four
relevant
propositions
routine
prosecution
government
assembled
evidence
expects
establish
respondent
guilt
waited
almost
months
seek
indictment
delay
prejudicial
respondent
defense
reason
whatsoever
explains
delay
may
reasonably
infer
prosecutor
merely
busy
matters
considered
important
case
question
presented
facts
easy
one
nevertheless
unless
conclude
constitution
imposes
constraints
prosecutor
power
postpone
filing
formal
charges
suit
convenience
believe
must
affirm
judgment
appeals
contrary
position
tenable
one
assumes
constitutional
right
fair
hearing
includes
right
whatsoever
prompt
hearing
moody
daggett
stevens
dissenting
requirement
speedy
justice
part
tradition
since
magna
carta
see
came
country
embodied
early
state
constitutions
see
massachusetts
constitution
part
art
xi
later
sixth
amendment
constitution
applied
case
respondent
made
numerous
anxious
inquiries
postal
inspectors
concerning
whether
indicted
delay
caused
substantial
prejudice
respondent
government
offered
justification
delay
right
speedy
justice
honored
right
honored
case
kind
basic
values
framers
intended
protect
sixth
amendment
guarantee
speedy
trial
motivated
congress
enact
speedy
trial
act
become
nothing
managerial
considerations
prosecutor
manipulate
respectfully
dissent
settled
rule
review
concurrent
findings
fact
two
courts
absence
obvious
exceptional
showing
error
berenyi
immigration
director
citing
graver
mfg
linde
justice
jackson
called
seasoned
wise
rule
comstock
group
investors
examination
transcript
district
hearing
reveals
government
produced
evidence
indictment
delayed
government
stipulated
proceeded
grand
jury
evidence
collected
months
presentation
additional
evidence
caused
proceed
although
appeals
surmised
reason
existed
delay
except
hope
part
government
others
might
discovered
may
participated
theft
even
assumption
borne
record
district
hearing
although
oath
prosecuting
attorney
indicated
government
theorized
guns
question
came
respondent
son
worked
freight
terminal
access
mails
yet
even
theory
never
shown
cause
delay
even
prosecuting
attorney
stated
much