sawyer
smith
argued
april
decided
june
petitioner
sawyer
conviction
death
sentence
brutal
murder
became
final
federal
district
denied
habeas
corpus
petition
based
relevant
part
argument
prosecutor
closing
argument
penalty
phase
trial
diminished
jury
sense
responsibility
capital
sentencing
decision
violation
decision
caldwell
mississippi
appeal
denial
habeas
relief
pending
decided
teague
lane
new
rule
constitutional
law
established
petitioner
conviction
become
final
may
used
attack
conviction
federal
habeas
corpus
unless
rule
places
entire
category
primary
conduct
beyond
reach
criminal
law
prohibits
imposition
certain
type
punishment
class
defendants
status
offense
see
penry
lynaugh
applies
new
watershed
rule
criminal
procedure
enhances
accuracy
necessary
fundamental
fairness
criminal
proceeding
appeals
affirmed
denial
relief
holding
caldwell
announced
new
rule
within
meaning
teague
fall
within
teague
second
exception
held
petitioner
entitled
federal
habeas
relief
caldwell
announced
new
rule
defined
teague
come
within
either
teague
exceptions
pp
caldwell
result
dictated
eighth
amendment
precedent
existing
time
petitioner
conviction
became
final
case
prior
caldwell
invalidated
prosecutorial
argument
impermissible
eighth
amendment
discussion
improper
prosecutorial
comment
donnelly
dechristoforo
noncapital
murder
case
based
due
process
clause
guarantees
fundamental
fairness
eighth
amendment
particular
guarantees
sentencing
reliability
eddings
oklahoma
lockett
ohio
gardner
florida
woodson
north
carolina
earlier
eighth
amendment
cases
spoke
general
issue
sentencing
reliability
issue
decided
caldwell
teague
meaningless
applied
level
generality
state
point
view
indications
caldwell
eighth
amendment
requirement
see
california
ramos
maggio
williams
doubt
view
concerning
major
premise
caldwell
misleading
prosecutorial
comment
might
cause
bias
favor
death
sentences
see
dobbert
florida
said
state
cases
anticipating
caldwell
rule
prohibited
similar
prosecutorial
statements
decisions
based
state
law
purport
construe
eighth
amendment
reliance
cases
misapprehends
function
federal
habeas
relief
serves
ensure
state
convictions
comport
established
federal
law
time
petitioner
conviction
becomes
final
extent
louisiana
cases
reflect
state
recognition
general
eighth
amendment
principles
pointed
toward
adoption
caldwell
rule
caldwell
congruent
preexisting
state
law
serve
show
caldwell
dictated
eighth
amendment
precedents
since
courts
expected
apply
principles
announced
prior
eighth
amendment
decisions
susceptible
debate
among
reasonable
minds
petitioner
argument
state
courts
provided
protection
misleading
prosecutorial
comment
unless
compelled
federal
precedent
threat
federal
habeas
review
premised
skepticism
state
courts
declines
endorse
pp
caldwell
come
within
either
teague
exceptions
first
exception
applicability
petitioner
argument
second
exception
read
include
new
rules
capital
sentencing
preserve
accuracy
fairness
judgments
looks
first
half
exception
definition
qualify
teague
rule
must
improve
accuracy
trial
must
also
essential
fairness
proceeding
limit
second
exception
recast
suggested
petitioner
since
almost
eighth
amendment
jurisprudence
concerning
capital
sentencing
directed
toward
enhancement
reliability
accuracy
sense
caldwell
systemic
rule
designed
enhancement
accuracy
capital
sentencing
however
measure
protection
error
context
capital
sentencing
added
already
existing
due
process
guarantee
fundamental
fairness
afforded
donnelly
supra
defendants
need
rely
caldwell
rather
donnelly
must
concede
prosecutorial
argument
case
harmful
render
sentencing
trial
fundamentally
unfair
thus
said
caldwell
type
absolute
prerequisite
fundamental
fairness
may
come
within
teague
second
exception
dugger
adams
pp
kennedy
delivered
opinion
rehnquist
white
scalia
joined
marshall
filed
dissenting
opinion
brennan
joined
blackmun
joined
parts
ii
iii
iv
stevens
joined
parts
ii
iii
post
catherine
hancock
argued
cause
petitioner
briefs
elizabeth
cole
dorothy
pendergast
argued
cause
respondent
brief
john
mamoulides
terry
boudreaux
julius
chambers
filed
brief
naacp
legal
defense
educational
fund
amicus
curiae
urging
reversal
kent
scheidegger
filed
brief
criminal
justice
legal
foundation
amicus
curiae
urging
affirmance
briefs
amici
curiae
filed
american
bar
association
stanley
chauvin
jay
topkis
ronald
tabak
eric
freedman
stephan
sachs
et
al
randy
hertz
michael
millemann
justice
kennedy
delivered
opinion
must
decide
case
whether
prisoner
whose
murder
conviction
became
final
decision
caldwell
mississippi
entitled
use
decision
challenge
capital
sentence
federal
habeas
corpus
action
hold
caldwell
announced
new
rule
defined
teague
lane
new
rule
come
within
teague
exception
watershed
rules
fundamental
integrity
criminal
proceeding
years
ago
petitioner
robert
sawyer
murdered
frances
arwood
visitor
new
orleans
louisiana
residence
petitioner
shared
girlfriend
cynthia
shano
september
petitioner
accomplice
charles
lane
arrived
residence
night
drinking
argued
arwood
accused
giving
drugs
shano
children
reasons
clear
petitioner
lane
struck
arwood
repeatedly
fists
dragged
hair
bathroom
stripped
victim
naked
literally
kicked
bathtub
subjected
scalding
dunkings
additional
beatings
petitioner
left
lane
guard
victim
apparently
rape
petitioner
went
kitchen
boil
water
scald
petitioner
kicked
arwood
chest
causing
head
strike
tub
windowsill
rendering
unconscious
pair
dragged
arwood
living
room
continued
beat
kick
petitioner
poured
lighter
fluid
unconscious
victim
particularly
torso
genital
area
set
lighter
fluid
afire
told
lane
done
show
cruel
brutalities
recount
arwood
later
died
injuries
petitioner
convicted
sentenced
death
crime
louisiana
jury
september
issue
case
remarks
made
prosecutor
closing
argument
sentencing
phase
trial
prosecutor
first
stated
discussing
proof
aggravating
circumstances
louisiana
law
law
provides
find
one
circumstances
juror
sentencing
robert
sawyer
electric
chair
saying
people
parish
appellate
state
possibly
people
factfinding
body
facts
evidence
heard
relationship
man
conduct
opinion
aggravating
circumstances
defined
statute
state
legislature
type
crime
deserves
penalty
merely
recommendation
try
may
weidner
tells
every
one
hope
live
conscience
try
play
upon
emotions
deny
difficult
decision
one
likes
make
type
decisions
realize
man
actions
type
life
decided
live
free
choosing
presenting
evidence
making
argument
make
decision
tr
really
whole
lot
said
point
time
already
said
done
decision
hands
people
going
take
initial
step
initial
step
saying
people
parish
man
judges
going
review
case
day
people
agree
tolerate
individual
commit
heinous
atrocious
crime
degrade
fellow
human
without
authority
impact
full
authority
impact
law
louisiana
saying
man
actions
prosecuted
fullest
extent
law
less
feel
otherwise
feel
like
one
easy
defense
lawyers
try
make
every
one
feel
like
pulling
switch
wrong
decision
believe
believe
others
behind
either
agree
say
wrong
ask
courage
convictions
petitioner
filed
federal
habeas
corpus
petition
us
raising
host
constitutional
claims
relevant
petitioner
claim
prosecutor
closing
argument
violated
eighth
amendment
constitution
diminishing
jury
sense
responsibility
capital
sentencing
decision
violation
decision
caldwell
mississippi
caldwell
decided
one
year
petitioner
conviction
became
final
district
denied
relief
concluding
prosecutor
remarks
different
character
caldwell
reasonable
probability
sentence
different
absence
comments
divided
panel
appeals
fifth
circuit
affirmed
panel
held
facts
case
far
cry
caldwell
large
part
due
absence
judicial
approval
prosecutor
comments
following
panel
decision
fifth
circuit
granted
rehearing
en
banc
en
banc
heard
oral
argument
case
pending
held
teague
lane
rule
constitutional
law
established
petitioner
conviction
become
final
may
used
attack
conviction
federal
habeas
corpus
unless
rule
falls
within
one
two
narrow
exceptions
fifth
circuit
requested
supplemental
briefing
parties
question
whether
teague
barred
petitioner
claim
relief
caldwell
en
banc
held
caldwell
announced
new
rule
within
meaning
teague
rule
within
teague
second
exception
watershed
rules
criminal
procedure
guarantee
accuracy
criminal
proceeding
accordingly
appeals
affirmed
denial
habeas
corpus
relief
granted
certiorari
resolve
conflict
among
courts
appeals
see
hopkinson
shillinger
affirm
ii
must
address
first
whether
relying
caldwell
petitioner
claims
benefit
new
rule
defined
decision
teague
caldwell
held
eighth
amendment
prohibits
imposition
death
sentence
sentencer
led
false
belief
responsibility
determining
appropriateness
defendant
capital
sentence
rests
elsewhere
see
opinion
determined
false
information
type
might
produce
substantial
unreliability
well
bias
favor
death
sentences
outset
note
parties
dispute
whether
caldwell
even
rule
applies
support
claim
relief
petitioner
case
state
emphasizes
judge
case
unlike
caldwell
see
approve
prosecutor
argument
remarks
case
less
likely
mislead
petitioner
hand
contends
prosecutor
remarks
similar
caldwell
cured
judge
instructions
jury
need
address
significant
questions
concerning
merits
petitioner
caldwell
claim
facts
question
whether
application
caldwell
facts
presented
involve
new
rule
law
rather
address
whether
caldwell
available
petitioner
ground
upon
may
seek
relief
cf
dugger
adams
merit
caldwell
claim
immaterial
disposition
case
procedural
bar
grounds
review
relevant
precedents
preceded
caldwell
convinces
us
new
rule
purposes
teague
point
accord
appeals
well
two
courts
appeals
addressed
question
see
clark
dugger
hopkinson
shillinger
supra
rule
teague
serves
validat
reasonable
interpretations
existing
precedents
made
state
courts
even
though
shown
contrary
later
decisions
butler
mckellar
thus
defined
new
rules
dictated
precedent
existing
time
defendant
conviction
became
final
teague
supra
plurality
opinion
principle
announced
teague
serves
ensure
gradual
developments
law
reasonable
jurists
may
disagree
later
used
upset
finality
state
convictions
valid
entered
recognition
purpose
federal
habeas
corpus
ensure
state
convictions
comply
federal
law
existence
time
conviction
became
final
provide
mechanism
continuing
reexamination
final
judgments
based
upon
later
emerging
legal
doctrine
caldwell
course
decided
upon
clean
slate
caldwell
recognized
earlier
addressed
question
improper
prosecutorial
comment
donnelly
dechristoforo
stated
donnelly
improper
remarks
prosecutor
point
infec
trial
unfairness
make
resulting
conviction
denial
due
process
pervasive
error
established
case
took
occasion
warn
holding
every
improper
unfair
argument
state
prosecutor
federal
due
process
violation
caldwell
supra
caldwell
unlike
donnelly
capital
case
noting
principle
set
forth
donnelly
caldwell
determined
rely
due
process
clause
particular
guarantees
sentencing
reliability
based
eighth
amendment
donnelly
reversed
appeals
opinion
vacating
conviction
prosecutorial
comments
potentially
misleading
caldwell
found
need
reliable
sentencing
capital
cases
required
new
sentencing
proceeding
false
prosecutorial
comment
created
unacceptable
risk
death
penalty
may
meted
arbitrarily
capriciously
opinion
examination
eighth
amendment
authorities
preceded
caldwell
shows
dictated
prior
precedent
existing
time
defendant
conviction
became
final
caldwell
relied
eddings
oklahoma
lockett
ohio
plurality
opinion
gardner
florida
plurality
opinion
woodson
north
carolina
support
result
cited
decisions
general
proposition
capital
sentencing
must
guarantees
reliability
must
carried
jurors
view
relevant
characteristics
crime
criminal
take
task
serious
one
petitioner
cites
cases
support
argument
caldwell
rooted
eighth
amendment
command
reliable
sentencing
application
cases
misleading
prosecutorial
comment
analogy
lead
predictable
caldwell
result
brief
petitioner
doubt
earlier
eighth
amendment
cases
lent
general
support
conclusion
reached
caldwell
neither
fact
petitioner
contention
state
courts
found
caldwell
predictable
development
eighth
amendment
law
brief
petitioner
suffices
show
caldwell
new
rule
petitioner
view
caldwell
dictated
principle
reliability
capital
sentencing
test
meaningless
applied
level
generality
cf
anderson
creighton
test
clearly
established
law
applied
level
generality
laintiffs
able
convert
rule
qualified
immunity
cases
plainly
establish
rule
virtually
unqualified
liability
simply
alleging
violation
extremely
abstract
rights
beyond
question
case
prior
caldwell
invalidated
prosecutorial
argument
impermissible
eighth
amendment
eddings
lockett
invalidated
statutory
schemes
imposed
absolute
prohibition
consideration
certain
mitigating
evidence
sentencer
woodson
invalidated
capital
sentencing
statute
providing
mandatory
capital
sentencing
gardner
invalidated
capital
sentence
based
information
defendant
notice
opportunity
respond
cases
speak
issue
decided
caldwell
said
saffle
parks
applies
even
agree
petitioner
assertion
decisions
lockett
eddings
inform
even
control
govern
analysis
claim
follow
compel
rule
petitioner
seeks
certainly
caldwell
seen
compelled
three
justices
found
lack
authority
eighth
amendment
precedents
approach
taken
see
rehnquist
dissenting
point
view
state
considering
petitioner
claim
time
conviction
became
final
saffle
supra
fact
indications
decisions
caldwell
rule
requirement
eighth
amendment
previous
case
raising
eighth
amendment
challenge
prosecutorial
comment
rejected
petitioner
claim
california
ramos
indeed
mississippi
held
without
dissent
caldwell
ramos
stood
proposition
may
decide
whether
error
mention
jurors
matter
appellate
review
see
caldwell
state
mississippi
characterization
ramos
course
later
proved
incorrect
nonetheless
suggests
prior
caldwell
cases
put
courts
notice
eighth
amendment
compelled
caldwell
result
opinion
maggio
williams
provides
direct
evidence
rule
caldwell
described
dictated
existing
law
time
petitioner
claim
became
final
williams
vacated
stay
execution
case
presenting
claim
similar
caldwell
justice
stevens
opinion
concurring
judgment
described
length
prosecutor
argument
case
one
similar
argument
made
caldwell
however
found
prisoner
challenge
prosecutor
statements
warrant
ed
little
discussion
although
stated
failure
raise
claim
improper
prosecutorial
argument
earlier
habeas
petition
inexcusable
noted
district
second
petition
given
claim
full
consideration
standard
established
donnelly
dechristoforo
found
prosecutor
closing
argument
render
williams
trial
fundamentally
unfair
opinion
concluded
describing
claims
raised
williams
insubstantial
williams
course
represent
rejection
merits
rule
announced
caldwell
given
statements
concerning
similar
claim
williams
think
state
viewing
petitioner
case
time
conviction
became
final
concluded
eighth
amendment
precedents
compelled
rule
note
also
petitioner
conviction
became
final
reason
doubt
view
concerning
became
major
premise
caldwell
misleading
prosecutorial
comment
might
cause
bias
favor
death
sentences
time
petitioner
trial
appeal
least
suggestion
see
dugger
adams
comments
tending
diminish
jury
sense
sentencing
responsibility
skew
result
toward
leniency
rather
death
sentence
see
dobbert
florida
florida
change
system
jury
verdict
advisory
might
benefit
defendants
jury
may
chosen
leniency
knew
sentencing
decision
rested
ultimately
shoulders
trial
judge
might
followed
course
vote
final
petitioner
places
primary
reliance
numerous
state
cases
decided
prior
finality
conviction
prohibited
prosecutorial
statements
type
later
held
violate
eighth
amendment
caldwell
see
ward
commonwealth
ice
commonwealth
cert
denied
wiley
state
miss
cert
denied
williams
state
miss
cert
denied
state
robinson
la
state
willie
la
cert
denied
state
jones
state
gilbert
state
tyner
hawes
state
fleming
state
cert
denied
state
white
prevatte
state
state
hines
petitioner
argues
authorities
show
state
courts
anticipated
rule
caldwell
state
reliance
interest
upset
retroactive
application
federal
rule
overturn
state
conviction
became
final
caldwell
decided
flaw
argument
availability
claim
state
law
establish
claim
available
constitution
dugger
adams
supra
cases
cited
respondent
one
arguable
exception
decisions
state
law
purport
construe
eighth
amendment
cases
moreover
apply
state
common
law
rules
prohibiting
mention
appellate
review
condemn
false
prosecutorial
statements
eighth
amendment
analysis
employed
caldwell
reliance
state
law
cases
proposition
rule
adopted
caldwell
old
one
misapprehends
function
federal
habeas
corpus
said
relevant
frame
reference
new
rule
inquiry
purpose
new
rule
whose
benefit
defendant
seeks
instead
purposes
writ
habeas
corpus
made
available
teague
quoting
mackey
federal
habeas
corpus
serves
ensure
state
convictions
comport
federal
law
established
time
petitioner
conviction
became
final
petitioner
points
support
argument
caldwell
applied
old
rule
opinion
based
part
adoption
many
state
courts
rules
prohibited
prosecutorial
comments
diminish
jury
sense
sentencing
responsibility
brief
petitioner
see
true
cases
looked
decisions
state
courts
legislatures
inform
eighth
amendment
analysis
petitioner
attempt
use
fact
show
caldwell
old
rule
untenable
view
state
decisions
inform
decisions
substantive
content
eighth
amendment
simultaneous
effect
impose
standards
back
upon
retroactive
effect
view
also
inconsistent
citation
penry
lynaugh
ford
wainwright
relied
eighth
amendment
analysis
statutory
common
law
majority
see
example
new
rule
one
louisiana
case
cited
petitioner
disapproving
prosecutorial
comment
appellate
review
discuss
eighth
amendment
principles
rather
relying
solely
state
law
even
case
however
cited
eighth
amendment
cases
discussion
prosecutorial
reference
possibility
pardon
discussion
prosecutorial
comment
appellate
review
issue
us
referred
state
law
rules
see
state
willie
supra
la
cert
denied
petitioner
also
cites
louisiana
cases
cite
caldwell
state
cases
interchangeably
state
caldwell
change
prior
law
state
see
state
smith
state
clark
state
ex
rel
busby
butler
extent
cases
reflect
state
recognition
general
eighth
amendment
principles
pointed
toward
adoption
caldwell
rule
caldwell
congruent
preexisting
state
law
serve
show
caldwell
dictated
eighth
amendment
precedent
state
courts
well
federal
expected
engage
application
principles
announced
prior
eighth
amendment
decisions
susceptible
debate
among
reasonable
minds
butler
petitioner
appears
contend
state
courts
recognize
federal
constitutional
protections
compelled
federal
precedent
threat
federal
habeas
review
since
state
courts
recognized
principle
similar
caldwell
argument
goes
result
caldwell
must
compelled
eighth
amendment
precedent
argument
premised
skepticism
state
courts
decline
endorse
state
courts
coequal
parts
national
judicial
system
give
serious
attention
responsibilities
enforcing
commands
constitution
surprising
state
courts
whether
applying
federal
constitutional
protections
seeking
fair
administration
state
capital
punishment
law
taken
care
exclude
misleading
prosecutorial
comment
conscientious
exercise
powers
supervision
review
dictate
caldwell
principle
federal
law
eighth
amendment
iii
teague
new
rules
may
applied
habeas
corpus
proceedings
come
within
one
two
narrow
exceptions
saffle
first
applies
new
rules
place
entire
category
primary
conduct
beyond
reach
criminal
law
teague
supra
plurality
opinion
new
rules
prohibit
imposition
certain
type
punishment
class
defendants
status
offense
penry
supra
exception
application
second
teague
exception
applies
new
watershed
rules
criminal
procedure
necessary
fundamental
fairness
criminal
proceeding
saffle
supra
teague
plurality
opinion
petitioner
challenges
appeals
conclusion
caldwell
come
within
exception
petitioner
contends
second
teague
exception
read
include
new
rules
capital
sentencing
preserve
accuracy
fairness
capital
sentencing
judgments
brief
petitioner
test
looks
half
definition
second
exception
acceptance
petitioner
argument
return
second
exception
broad
definition
justice
harlan
first
proposed
desist
later
abandoned
mackey
new
rules
significantly
improve
preexisting
factfinding
procedures
retroactively
applied
habeas
desist
teague
modified
justice
harlan
test
combine
accuracy
element
desist
test
mackey
limitation
exception
watershed
rules
fundamental
fairness
thus
enough
teague
say
new
rule
aimed
improving
accuracy
trial
required
rule
qualifies
exception
must
improve
accuracy
also
alter
understanding
bedrock
procedural
elements
essential
fairness
proceeding
teague
supra
quoting
mackey
scope
teague
exceptions
must
consistent
recognition
pplication
constitutional
rules
existence
time
conviction
became
final
seriously
undermines
principle
finality
essential
operation
criminal
justice
system
teague
supra
plurality
opinion
citing
friendly
innocence
irrelevant
collateral
attacks
criminal
judgments
costs
imposed
upon
state
retroactive
application
new
rules
constitutional
law
habeas
corpus
thus
generally
far
outweigh
benefits
application
solem
stumes
opinion
powell
stated
teague
second
exception
directed
new
rules
essential
accuracy
fairness
criminal
process
unlikely
many
components
basic
due
process
yet
emerge
plurality
opinion
difficult
see
limit
definition
second
exception
cast
proposed
petitioner
eighth
amendment
jurisprudence
concerning
capital
sentencing
directed
toward
enhancement
reliability
accuracy
sense
indeed
petitioner
suggested
eighth
amendment
rule
sufficiently
fundamental
qualify
proposed
definition
exception
oral
argument
case
counsel
unable
provide
single
example
tr
oral
arg
practical
effect
petitioner
asks
us
overrule
decision
penry
teague
applies
new
rules
capital
sentencing
decline
time
petitioner
trial
appeal
rule
donnelly
place
protect
defendant
show
prosecutor
remarks
fact
made
proceeding
fundamentally
unfair
always
open
petitioner
challenge
prosecutor
remarks
sentencing
proceeding
making
showing
required
donnelly
see
dugger
adams
defendant
whose
trial
appeal
occurred
prior
caldwell
challenged
improper
remarks
trial
judge
time
trial
violation
due
process
see
donnelly
dechristoforo
maggio
williams
discussing
application
donnelly
improper
remarks
sentencing
petitioner
contested
appeals
finding
claim
relief
donnelly
standard
appeals
stated
defendants
need
rely
caldwell
rather
donnelly
must
concede
prosecutorial
argument
case
harmful
render
sentencing
trial
fundamentally
unfair
rather
focusing
prejudice
defendant
must
shown
establish
donnelly
violation
concern
caldwell
unacceptable
risk
misleading
remarks
affect
reliability
sentence
see
opinion
caldwell
must
therefore
read
providing
additional
measure
protection
error
beyond
afforded
donnelly
special
context
capital
sentencing
see
darden
wainwright
caldwell
rule
designed
enhancement
accuracy
capital
sentencing
protection
systemic
value
state
federal
courts
charged
reviewing
capital
proceedings
given
added
existing
guarantee
due
process
protection
fundamental
unfairness
say
systemic
rule
enhancing
reliability
absolute
prerequisite
fundamental
fairness
type
may
come
within
teague
second
exception
discussions
nature
caldwell
error
contexts
also
support
conclusion
dugger
adams
supra
held
failure
consider
caldwell
claim
come
within
fundamental
miscarriage
justice
exception
doctrine
procedural
default
see
murray
carrier
rejected
dissent
contention
fundamental
miscarriage
justice
shown
essence
caldwell
claim
accuracy
sentencing
determination
unconstitutionally
undermined
dugger
supra
similarly
williams
supra
justice
stevens
concluded
discussion
claim
stating
question
whether
said
trial
fundamentally
unfair
see
rose
lundy
stevens
dissenting
cases
course
involved
different
rules
contexts
yet
think
rationale
reflects
rejection
argument
caldwell
represents
rule
fundamental
criminal
proceeding
petitioner
seeks
benefit
new
rule
come
within
either
teague
exceptions
claim
habeas
corpus
relief
without
merit
judgment
appeals
therefore
affirmed
closing
argument
sentencing
phase
robert
sawyer
trial
prosecutor
emphatically
argued
jury
sentence
death
merely
recommendation
others
able
correct
decision
turned
wrong
argument
misrepresented
scope
appellate
review
capital
sentences
louisiana
law
art
west
review
state
limited
question
whether
sentence
death
excessive
prosecutor
effort
minimize
jury
sense
responsibility
precisely
type
misleading
argument
condemned
caldwell
mississippi
therefore
fundamentally
incompatible
eighth
amendment
heightened
need
reliability
determination
death
appropriate
punishment
quoting
woodson
north
carolina
plurality
opinion
refuses
address
sawyer
caldwell
claim
merits
instead
holds
caldwell
created
new
rule
within
meaning
teague
lane
ante
caldwell
protection
misleading
prosecutorial
argument
watershed
rul
criminal
procedure
essential
fundamental
fairness
capital
proceeding
ante
quoting
saffle
parks
reach
result
majority
misrepresents
source
function
caldwell
prohibitions
thereby
applying
retroactivity
bar
case
state
legitimate
interest
finality
death
sentence
obtained
intentional
misconduct
dissent
teague
plurality
declared
case
announces
new
rule
result
dictated
precedent
existing
time
defendant
conviction
became
final
term
held
new
rule
principle
validates
reasonable
interpretations
existing
precedents
made
state
courts
even
though
shown
contrary
later
decisions
butler
mckellar
accord
parks
supra
quoting
butler
supra
continue
regard
effort
curtail
scope
federal
habeas
inconsistent
congress
intent
provide
state
prisoners
opportunity
redress
unlawful
state
deprivations
liberty
interests
fresh
full
review
claims
article
iii
butler
supra
brennan
joined
marshall
blackmun
stevens
dissenting
even
majority
standard
though
answer
legal
question
susceptible
debate
among
reasonable
minds
butler
supra
existing
precedent
compelled
state
courts
provide
relief
time
defendant
conviction
became
final
parks
supra
decision
announce
new
legal
rule
within
meaning
teague
circumstances
defendant
entitled
retroactive
benefit
decision
seeks
invoke
new
rule
inquiry
spelled
teague
butler
parks
confirms
caldwell
create
new
rule
roots
caldwell
rule
traced
directly
eighth
amendment
decisions
demanding
heightened
reliability
capital
sentencing
woodson
north
carolina
supra
plurality
opinion
lockett
ohio
plurality
opinion
eddings
oklahoma
concurring
woodson
lockett
eddings
considered
rejected
efforts
furman
georgia
eliminate
arbitrariness
administration
death
penalty
limiting
withdrawing
sentencer
discretion
decisions
well
decisions
upheld
capital
sentencing
schemes
see
gregg
georgia
proffitt
florida
jurek
texas
emphasized
sentencers
must
confront
truly
awesome
responsibility
decreeing
death
fellow
human
due
regard
consequences
decision
lockett
supra
plurality
opinion
internal
quotation
marks
citation
omitted
time
caldwell
eighth
amendment
jurisprudence
ha
taken
given
capital
sentencers
view
task
serious
one
determining
whether
specific
human
die
hands
state
majority
nonetheless
insists
principle
reliability
capital
sentencing
framed
high
level
generality
treating
relevant
principle
determining
whether
caldwell
new
law
render
teague
meaningless
ante
argument
ignores
centrality
caldwell
rule
reliability
capital
sentencing
caldwell
error
affects
consideration
relevant
sentencing
factors
entire
decisionmaking
process
prosecutor
misleadingly
tells
jury
verdict
may
corrected
appeal
prosecutor
invites
jury
shirk
sentencing
responsibility
prosecutor
essentially
informs
jury
verdict
less
important
execution
occur
without
independent
approval
higher
authorities
extent
prosecutor
comments
focused
unambiguous
strong
caldwell
supra
misconduct
casts
irredeemable
doubt
resulting
verdict
rules
capital
proceedings
contribute
fundamentally
reliability
rules
majority
rejection
reliability
principle
general
may
apt
example
rule
batson
kentucky
prohibiting
state
exercising
peremptory
challenges
racially
discriminatory
manner
fundamental
impact
accuracy
opposed
integrity
criminal
process
see
allen
hardy
caldwell
rule
though
prerequisite
reliability
capital
sentencing
unlike
right
counsel
right
jury
understands
gravity
task
essential
vindication
sentencing
guarantees
meticulous
presentation
evidence
careful
instruction
law
minimal
value
defendant
whose
jury
led
believe
verdict
little
consequence
majority
observation
caldwell
prohibition
misleading
prosecutorial
argument
specific
thus
undermine
sawyer
assertion
dictated
eighth
amendment
general
insistence
reliability
capital
sentencing
majority
assertion
fact
indications
decisions
caldwell
rule
requirement
eighth
amendment
ante
unsupported
cases
majority
relies
california
ramos
defendant
challenged
california
requirement
trial
courts
instruct
capital
juries
governor
power
commute
life
sentences
rejecting
eighth
amendment
challenge
emphasized
challenged
instruction
accurate
distinguished
gardner
florida
struck
death
sentence
based
part
information
contained
presentence
report
disclosed
defense
counsel
unlike
gardner
risk
information
relied
sentencing
may
en
erroneous
plurality
opinion
sentencing
decision
ramos
rest
part
erroneous
inaccurate
information
see
also
ibid
need
reliability
capital
sentencing
require
reversal
challenged
instruction
gave
jury
accurate
information
cf
caldwell
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
view
prosecutor
remarks
impermissible
inaccurate
misleading
manner
diminished
jury
sense
responsibility
agree
valid
state
penological
interest
imparting
inaccurate
misleading
information
minimizes
importance
jury
deliberations
capital
sentencing
case
quoting
majority
opinion
ramos
approval
california
decision
provide
capital
juries
accurate
information
respecting
commutation
reasonably
read
approval
misleading
inaccurate
prosecutorial
argument
concerning
scope
appellate
review
mississippi
caldwell
erroneously
read
ramos
broadly
majority
argues
sugges
prior
caldwell
cases
put
courts
notice
eighth
amendment
compelled
caldwell
result
ante
courts
misconstrue
precedents
notwithstanding
clarity
see
mckoy
north
carolina
state
failed
adhere
clear
direction
mills
maryland
mere
fact
single
adopts
position
contrary
one
dictated
precedents
confirm
case
law
unclear
indeed
standard
almost
every
decision
announce
new
rule
seldom
take
cases
resolve
issues
lower
courts
universal
agreement
moreover
majority
view
state
decisions
misconstruing
scope
eighth
amendment
decisions
simultaneously
limit
reach
decisions
matter
federal
law
cf
ante
ironically
majority
regards
one
errant
decision
mississippi
evidence
uncertainty
yet
dismisses
irrelevant
new
rule
inquiry
rejection
prosecutorial
argument
prior
caldwell
supra
collecting
cases
even
mississippi
declared
ny
argument
state
distorts
minimizes
solemn
obligation
responsibility
jury
serious
error
hill
state
miss
refusing
rule
defendant
claim
however
absence
contemporaneous
objection
state
decisions
even
premised
federal
law
play
part
determining
status
constitutional
protections
eighth
amendment
amendment
draw
meaning
evolving
standards
decency
mark
progress
maturing
society
trop
dulles
plurality
opinion
often
looked
laws
barometer
contemporary
values
see
penry
lynaugh
ford
wainwright
course
recognition
right
state
law
translate
automatically
existence
federal
constitutional
protection
consensus
among
regarding
essential
ingredient
fair
trial
sentencing
phase
state
berry
la
opinion
rehearing
evidence
right
cognizable
federal
constitution
strong
condemnation
misleading
prosecutorial
argument
regarding
scope
appellate
review
thus
additional
evidence
eighth
amendment
decisions
compelled
result
caldwell
moreover
majority
contention
state
courts
based
decisions
solely
state
common
law
ante
assumes
capital
punishment
jurisprudence
evolved
independently
eighth
amendment
decisions
state
decisions
regarding
capital
sentencing
procedures
even
explicitly
mention
federal
law
surely
informed
federal
principles
thus
accorded
weight
discerning
scope
federal
protections
especially
condescending
federalism
protect
retroactive
application
federal
law
dismissing
state
decisions
concerning
capital
sentencing
irrelevant
lineage
federal
law
approach
improper
prosecutorial
comments
donnelly
dechristoforo
also
supports
finding
caldwell
establish
new
rule
donnelly
prosecutor
hinted
defendant
might
willing
accept
lesser
penalty
crime
implicitly
suggesting
defendant
acknowledged
guilt
held
comment
violate
due
process
clause
ambiguous
corrected
trial
fleeting
influenced
jury
donnelly
specifically
confined
decision
prosecutorial
comments
implicate
specific
guarantees
bill
rights
claim
implicated
rights
acknowledged
special
care
required
assure
prosecutorial
conduct
way
impermissibly
infringe
ibid
donnelly
decided
prior
explicit
recognition
cases
following
gregg
eighth
amendment
affords
special
protections
defendants
facing
death
penalty
decisions
decade
donnelly
caldwell
made
unmistakably
clear
death
penalty
qualitatively
different
character
punishments
necessitates
corresponding
difference
need
reliability
determination
death
appropriate
punishment
specific
case
woodson
plurality
opinion
see
also
beck
alabama
quoting
gardner
plurality
opinion
moreover
jurisprudence
time
caldwell
indicated
unambiguously
eighth
amendment
protects
risk
death
penalty
imposed
arbitrary
capricious
manner
gregg
joint
opinion
stewart
powell
stevens
jj
see
also
lockett
plurality
opinion
light
repeated
emphasis
indispensable
safeguards
guaranteed
capital
sentencing
provision
bill
rights
faced
misleading
prosecutorial
comments
jury
sentencing
role
prior
caldwell
reasonably
concluded
basis
donnelly
comments
survive
scrutiny
majority
contrary
conclusion
rests
misunderstanding
relationship
caldwell
donnelly
majority
endorses
fifth
circuit
view
defendants
need
rely
caldwell
rather
donnelly
must
concede
prosecutorial
argument
case
harmful
render
sentencing
trial
fundamentally
unfair
ante
quoting
caldwell
majority
argues
additional
measure
protection
error
beyond
afforded
donnelly
special
context
capital
sentencing
ante
analysis
erroneously
presumes
precisely
caldwell
denies
focused
unambiguous
strong
prosecutorial
arguments
mislead
jury
sentencing
role
capital
context
ever
deemed
harmless
caldwell
rests
view
strong
uncorrected
unequivocal
prosecutorial
argument
minimizing
jury
sense
responsibility
capital
sentencing
decision
presents
intolerable
danger
jury
fact
choose
minimize
importance
role
caldwell
thus
tells
us
capital
trial
jury
misled
sentencing
role
fundamentally
unfair
therefore
violates
donnelly
well
majority
claim
maggio
williams
provides
direct
evidence
rule
caldwell
clear
time
petitioner
conviction
became
final
ante
likewise
unconvincing
williams
vacated
fifth
circuit
entry
stay
capital
case
williams
contentions
insubstantial
williams
alleged
inter
alia
prosecutor
closing
argument
elicited
decision
based
passion
rather
reason
prosecutor
argument
referred
scope
appellate
review
see
stevens
concurring
judgment
motion
vacate
stay
came
sole
issue
whether
reasonable
probability
four
members
vote
grant
certiorari
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
view
williams
prior
unsuccessful
efforts
secure
relief
similar
claims
applied
strict
standard
review
williams
application
stevens
concurring
judgment
discuss
merits
williams
claim
regarding
prosecutorial
argument
note
district
given
full
consideration
found
render
williams
trial
fundamentally
unfair
vacation
stay
circumstances
thus
reflects
view
williams
claims
posture
warrant
certiorari
plenary
consideration
sum
cases
dictated
result
caldwell
decided
sawyer
conviction
became
final
entitled
careful
review
merits
caldwell
claim
ii
even
caldwell
established
new
rule
rule
nonetheless
available
federal
habeas
rule
without
likelihood
accurate
verdict
seriously
diminished
teague
devastating
impact
prosecutorial
argument
diminishes
jurors
sense
responsibility
revealed
state
decisions
condemning
argument
see
fleming
state
holding
type
remark
unusual
potential
corrupting
death
sentencing
process
state
berry
reference
conveys
message
jurors
awesome
responsibility
lessened
fact
decision
final
one
reference
contains
inaccurate
misleading
information
defendant
fair
trial
sentencing
phase
penalty
vacated
ward
commonwealth
holding
prosecutor
clearly
sought
divert
minds
jurors
true
responsibility
case
implying
ultimate
responsibility
fall
trial
judge
appellate
courts
clearly
error
reversible
magnitude
hill
state
argument
state
distorts
minimizes
solemn
obligation
responsibility
jury
serious
error
death
penalty
case
jury
never
given
false
comfort
decision
make
corrected
wiley
state
miss
jury
literally
hangman
sic
may
supply
hangman
victims
notions
justice
require
jurors
individuals
body
recognize
appreciate
gravity
role
majority
underestimation
caldwell
importance
rests
defect
discussed
supra
namely
view
caldwell
error
render
trial
fundamentally
unfair
majority
vague
suggestion
caldwell
serves
protection
systemic
value
state
federal
courts
charged
reviewing
capital
proceedings
ante
disguise
inability
identify
concrete
terms
situation
caldwell
error
occurs
yet
capital
proceeding
described
fundamentally
fair
see
caldwell
holding
improper
prosecutorial
comment
occurs
sentencing
decision
meet
standard
reliability
eighth
amendment
requires
dugger
adams
undermine
caldwell
status
fundamental
rule
issue
whether
particular
defendant
failed
object
misleading
prosecutorial
argument
sentencing
suffered
sufficient
prejudice
justify
overlooking
state
procedural
bar
denial
relief
rested
largely
importance
state
interest
defendant
challenge
faulty
instruction
timely
manner
correct
misstatement
see
also
wainwright
sykes
stringent
standard
excusing
procedural
defaults
particular
defendant
premised
dual
notion
absent
exceptional
circumstances
defendant
bound
tactical
decisions
competent
counsel
defense
counsel
may
flout
state
procedures
turn
around
seek
refuge
federal
consequences
conduct
reed
ross
citations
omitted
concern
enforcing
state
procedural
rules
particular
defendant
stake
decide
whether
apply
new
constitutional
principles
retroactively
federal
habeas
cases
inquiry
instead
focuses
importance
new
principle
generally
fairness
accuracy
proceedings
principle
went
unobserved
whereas
dugger
inquiry
focuses
general
necessity
rule
ensure
accurate
verdict
cases
overlook
clear
procedural
default
error
probably
resulted
conviction
one
actually
innocent
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
strict
procedural
default
rule
designed
part
protect
state
interest
unique
context
procedural
default
correcting
error
first
instance
sykes
supra
finally
fundamental
importance
caldwell
denied
ground
unlikely
many
new
rules
basic
due
process
essential
accuracy
fairness
yet
emerge
ante
quoting
teague
majority
bind
future
present
constitutional
understandings
essential
due
process
see
hurtado
california
rightly
regard
statement
expression
hubris
discover
volume
reports
even
years
ago
time
incidentally
light
history
experience
present
limitations
human
knowledge
rejected
argument
committing
untrammeled
discretion
jury
power
pronounce
life
death
capital
cases
offensive
anything
constitution
mcgautha
california
omitted
cf
gregg
joint
opinion
stewart
powell
stevens
jj
furman
mandates
discretion
afforded
sentencing
body
matter
grave
determination
whether
human
life
taken
spared
discretion
must
suitably
directed
limited
minimize
risk
wholly
arbitrary
capricious
action
moreover
notion
already
discovered
procedures
central
fundamental
fairness
squarely
inconsistent
eighth
amendment
methodology
bedrock
eighth
amendment
principles
emerge
light
new
societal
understandings
experience
see
coker
georgia
plurality
opinion
iii
refusal
allow
sawyer
benefit
caldwell
reveals
extent
teague
progeny
unjustifiably
limit
retroactive
application
criminal
rules
prior
teague
retroactivity
jurisprudence
always
recognized
difference
rules
aimed
primarily
deterring
police
conduct
designed
promote
accuracy
criminal
proceedings
although
former
generally
applied
retroactively
see
linkletter
walker
routinely
afforded
defendants
benefit
new
constitutional
doctrine
whose
purpose
overcome
aspect
criminal
trial
substantially
impairs
function
raises
serious
questions
accuracy
guilty
verdicts
past
trials
williams
plurality
opinion
departed
general
rule
favoring
retroactive
application
rules
special
cases
retroactivity
undermined
substantial
reliance
interests
law
enforcement
officials
prosecutors
acted
good
faith
prior
change
law
see
stovall
denno
state
prosecutor
case
surely
claim
belief
legitimacy
conduct
proscribed
caldwell
misleading
inaccurate
argument
designed
minimize
jury
sentencing
responsibility
indeed
state
seems
concede
much
framing
reliance
interest
beyond
general
interest
finality
convictions
right
misleading
prosecutorial
remarks
reviewed
fundamental
fairness
standard
due
process
rather
eighth
amendment
brief
respondent
purported
reliance
interest
depends
erroneous
view
caldwell
error
survive
review
due
process
clause
see
supra
even
granting
distinction
degree
scrutiny
applied
donnelly
caldwell
state
claimed
interest
intentional
misconduct
reviewed
less
demanding
standard
hardly
worth
crediting
state
thus
left
rely
solely
general
interest
finality
criminal
proceedings
today
interest
never
alone
sufficient
preclude
vindication
constitutional
rights
federal
habeas
see
reed
ross
teague
course
stated
departing
traditional
approach
case
well
butler
parks
involved
rules
recognize
contributing
meaningfully
accuracy
criminal
proceedings
see
teague
failure
apply
rule
seriously
diminish
likelihood
obtaining
accurate
conviction
butler
failure
apply
rule
seriously
diminish
likelihood
obtaining
accurate
determination
indeed
may
increase
likelihood
parks
objectives
fairness
accuracy
likely
threatened
promoted
rule
cf
ante
acknowledging
caldwell
central
purpose
enhance
accuracy
capital
sentencing
cases
thus
decided
way
prior
retroactivity
doctrine
weighed
state
finality
reliance
interests
defendant
interests
protected
new
rule
balancing
competing
concerns
occurs
today
instead
simply
elevates
preference
finality
state
proceedings
congress
commitment
provide
federal
forum
state
prisoners
extending
habeas
corpus
powers
federal
courts
constitutional
maximum
fay
noia
raw
preference
finality
unjustified
although
state
undoubtedly
possesses
legitimate
interest
finality
convictions
state
undermines
accuracy
capital
proceeding
general
interest
must
give
way
demands
justice
iv
jury
sentenced
sawyer
death
deliberately
misled
significance
verdict
sawyer
thus
denied
fundamentally
fair
trial
apparent
sawyer
conviction
became
final
today
refusal
allow
federal
habeas
correct
error
yet
another
indication
less
concerned
safeguarding
constitutional
rights
speeding
defendants
deserving
executioner
dissent
even
believe
sawyer
entitled
federal
habeas
review
caldwell
claim
nonetheless
vacate
death
sentence
adhere
view
death
penalty
circumstances
cruel
unusual
punishment
gregg
georgia
marshall
dissenting
footnotes
majority
nonetheless
views
williams
casting
doubt
ultimate
disposition
caldwell
mississippi
prosecutor
argument
williams
similar
argument
caldwell
ante
position
though
overbroad
district
finding
williams
trial
fundamentally
unfair
donnelly
dechristoforo
tantamount
finding
williams
jury
misled
sentencing
role
see
williams
king
majority
rejection
view
caldwell
prohibitions
vital
fairness
capital
proceeding
reveals
tension
retroactivity
doctrine
time
majority
insists
caldwell
dictated
eighth
amendment
decisions
majority
also
argues
caldwell
fundamental
rule
affected
incremental
change
capital
sentencing
see
ante
stating
caldwell
provides
merely
additional
measure
protection
error
beyond
afforded
donnelly
rule
may
new
even
designed
serve
interests
substantially
similar
old
rule
majority
extensive
effort
new
rule
analysis
demonstrate
caldwell
additional
protections
marked
departure
eighth
amendment
jurisprudence
however
seems
disingenuous
light
conclusion
departure
amount
much