maine
taylor
argued
march
decided
june
appellee
bait
dealer
appellee
arranged
live
baitfish
imported
maine
despite
maine
statute
prohibiting
importation
indicted
federal
statute
making
federal
crime
transport
fish
interstate
commerce
violation
state
law
moved
dismiss
indictment
ground
maine
statute
unconstitutionally
burdened
interstate
commerce
maine
intervened
defend
validity
statute
evidentiary
hearing
district
denied
motion
dismiss
held
state
statute
constitutional
found
substantial
uncertainties
surrounded
effects
baitfish
parasites
nonnative
species
state
wild
fish
population
less
discriminatory
means
protecting
threats
currently
unavailable
appellee
entered
conditional
guilty
plea
reserving
right
appeal
district
constitutional
ruling
appeals
reversed
concluding
state
statute
unconstitutional
held
maine
entitled
invoke
jurisdiction
nothing
language
history
suggests
scope
limited
civil
litigation
fact
maine
intervenor
district
deprive
standing
pursue
appeal
stake
outcome
substantial
controversy
remains
live
notwithstanding
federal
government
decision
abandon
appeal
pp
maine
statute
constitutional
federal
statute
appellee
convicted
waive
requirement
hughes
oklahoma
state
statute
maine
import
ban
discriminates
interstate
commerce
either
face
practical
effect
state
must
show
statute
serves
legitimate
local
purpose
purpose
served
well
available
nondiscriminatory
means
evidence
amply
supports
district
findings
maine
made
showings
clearly
erroneous
standard
review
applicable
findings
appeals
erred
setting
aside
pp
blackmun
delivered
opinion
burger
brennan
white
marshall
powell
rehnquist
joined
stevens
filed
dissenting
opinion
post
cabanne
howard
deputy
attorney
general
maine
argued
cause
appellant
briefs
james
tierney
attorney
general
jerrold
ganzfried
argued
cause
appellee
rule
support
appellant
brief
solicitor
general
fried
assistant
attorney
general
habicht
deputy
solicitor
general
wallace
donald
carr
dirk
snel
margaret
hill
paul
eggert
argued
cause
appellee
taylor
brief
robert
edmond
mittel
justice
blackmun
delivered
opinion
little
fish
caused
commotion
see
hughes
oklahoma
tva
hill
cappaert
fish
case
golden
shiner
species
minnow
commonly
used
live
bait
sport
fishing
appellee
robert
taylor
hereafter
taylor
appellee
operates
bait
business
maine
despite
maine
statute
prohibiting
importation
live
baitfish
arranged
live
golden
shiners
delivered
outside
state
shipment
intercepted
federal
grand
jury
district
maine
indicted
taylor
violating
conspiring
violate
lacey
act
amendments
stat
section
amendments
makes
federal
crime
import
export
transport
sell
receive
acquire
purchase
interstate
foreign
commerce
fish
wildlife
taken
possessed
transported
sold
violation
law
regulation
state
violation
foreign
law
taylor
moved
dismiss
indictment
ground
maine
import
ban
unconstitutionally
burdens
interstate
commerce
therefore
may
form
basis
federal
prosecution
lacey
act
maine
pursuant
intervened
defend
validity
statute
arguing
ban
legitimately
protects
state
fisheries
parasites
nonnative
species
might
included
shipments
live
baitfish
district
found
statute
constitutional
denied
motion
dismiss
taylor
supp
taylor
entered
conditional
plea
guilty
pursuant
federal
rule
criminal
procedure
reserving
right
appeal
district
ruling
constitutional
question
appeals
first
circuit
reversed
agreeing
taylor
underlying
state
statute
impermissibly
restricts
interstate
trade
taylor
maine
appealed
set
case
plenary
review
postponed
consideration
taylor
challenges
appellate
jurisdiction
maine
invokes
jurisdiction
authorizes
appeal
right
party
relying
state
statute
held
appeals
invalid
repugnant
constitution
treaties
laws
appellee
however
contends
provision
applies
civil
cases
event
maine
lacks
standing
appeal
reversal
federal
conviction
contentions
relate
unusual
procedural
posture
case
appeal
state
reversal
federal
conviction
based
violation
state
law
consider
turn
first
despite
procedural
peculiarities
case
fits
squarely
within
plain
terms
maine
relies
state
statute
appeals
held
unconstitutional
although
statutes
authorizing
appeals
right
strictly
construed
see
silkwood
nothing
language
legislative
history
suggests
scope
limited
civil
litigation
arguing
limitation
appellee
relies
principally
fact
authorize
discretionary
review
cases
courts
appeals
writ
certiorari
certification
respectively
apply
explicitly
civil
criminal
case
since
express
language
absent
appellee
contends
congress
must
intended
appellate
jurisdiction
cases
courts
appeals
remain
limited
civil
cases
indeed
limited
prior
enactment
predecessor
find
argument
unconvincing
statutes
governing
jurisdiction
expressly
apply
civil
criminal
cases
others
explicitly
limited
civil
actions
see
absence
either
sort
provision
hardly
demonstrates
congress
civil
cases
mind
see
reason
read
limitation
straightforward
unambiguous
terms
statute
situation
sense
statute
literal
language
loggerheads
adherence
plain
terms
statute
confer
upon
jurisdiction
beyond
naturally
properly
belongs
heckler
edwards
quoting
florida
lime
avocado
growers
jacobsen
frankfurter
dissenting
turn
quoting
american
security
trust
district
columbia
section
serves
ensure
state
statute
struck
federal
judiciary
found
invalid
parties
acquiesce
decision
lower
federal
federal
nullification
state
statute
grave
matter
whether
occurs
civil
litigation
course
criminal
prosecution
review
particularly
warranted
either
event
appellee
second
jurisdictional
argument
based
fact
appellant
state
maine
intervenor
district
brought
original
prosecution
since
attorneys
sole
power
prosecute
criminal
cases
federal
courts
appellee
contends
maine
may
seek
review
appeals
reversal
conviction
statute
however
maine
intervened
rights
party
appeals
may
taken
party
relying
state
statute
held
invalid
federal
law
appeals
previously
recognized
intervenors
lower
federal
courts
may
seek
review
long
sufficient
stake
outcome
controversy
satisfy
constitutional
requirement
genuine
adversity
bryant
yellen
see
also
diamond
charles
maine
stake
outcome
litigation
substantial
judgment
appeals
left
undisturbed
state
bound
conclusive
adjudication
import
ban
unconstitutional
see
stoll
gottlieb
although
private
parties
perhaps
even
separate
sovereigns
legally
cognizable
interest
prosecutorial
decisions
federal
government
diamond
charles
supra
linda
richard
state
clearly
legitimate
interest
continued
enforceability
statutes
see
diamond
charles
supra
alfred
snapp
son
puerto
rico
ex
rel
barez
furthermore
reversal
judgment
appeals
result
automatic
reinstatement
appellee
guilty
plea
controversy
us
clearly
remains
live
notwithstanding
federal
government
decision
abandon
appeal
turn
merits
ii
commerce
clause
constitution
grants
congress
power
regulate
commerce
foreign
nations
among
several
indian
tribes
art
cl
although
clause
thus
speaks
terms
powers
bestowed
upon
congress
long
recognized
also
limits
power
erect
barriers
interstate
trade
lewis
bt
investment
managers
maine
statute
restricts
interstate
trade
direct
manner
possible
blocking
inward
shipments
live
baitfish
state
border
still
district
appeals
recognized
fact
alone
render
law
unconstitutional
limitation
imposed
commerce
clause
state
regulatory
power
means
absolute
retain
authority
general
police
powers
regulate
matters
legitimate
local
concern
even
though
interstate
commerce
may
affected
determining
whether
state
overstepped
role
regulating
interstate
commerce
distinguished
state
statutes
burden
interstate
transactions
incidentally
affirmatively
discriminate
transactions
statutes
first
group
violate
commerce
clause
burdens
impose
interstate
trade
clearly
excessive
relation
putative
local
benefits
pike
bruce
church
statutes
second
group
subject
demanding
scrutiny
explained
hughes
oklahoma
state
law
shown
discriminate
interstate
commerce
either
face
practical
effect
burden
falls
state
demonstrate
statute
serves
legitimate
local
purpose
purpose
served
well
available
nondiscriminatory
means
see
also
sporhase
nebraska
ex
rel
douglas
hunt
washington
state
apple
advertising
dean
milk
madison
district
appeals
reasoned
correctly
since
maine
import
ban
discriminates
face
interstate
trade
subject
strict
requirements
hughes
oklahoma
notwithstanding
maine
argument
requirements
waived
lacey
act
amendments
well
established
congress
may
authorize
engage
regulation
commerce
clause
otherwise
forbid
see
southern
pacific
arizona
ex
rel
sullivan
important
role
commerce
clause
plays
protecting
free
flow
interstate
trade
exempted
state
statutes
implied
limitations
clause
congressional
direction
unmistakably
clear
timber
development
wunnicke
amendments
lacey
act
clearly
provide
federal
enforcement
valid
state
foreign
wildlife
laws
maine
identifies
nothing
text
legislative
history
amendments
suggests
congress
wished
validate
state
laws
unconstitutional
without
federal
approval
maine
concedes
lacey
act
amendments
exempt
state
wildlife
legislation
scrutiny
commerce
clause
see
reply
brief
appellant
state
insists
however
amendments
lower
intensity
scrutiny
otherwise
applied
agree
unambiguous
indication
congressional
intent
required
federal
statute
read
authorize
otherwise
invalid
state
legislation
regardless
whether
purported
authorization
takes
form
flat
exemption
commerce
clause
scrutiny
less
direct
form
reduction
level
scrutiny
absent
clear
expression
approval
congress
relaxation
restrictions
state
power
otherwise
imposed
commerce
clause
unacceptably
increases
risk
unrepresented
interests
adversely
affected
restraints
commerce
timber
supra
case
simply
unambiguous
statement
congressional
intent
whatsoever
alter
limits
state
power
otherwise
imposed
commerce
clause
public
utilities
california
arguing
contrary
maine
relies
almost
exclusively
following
findings
senate
report
lacey
act
amendments
desirable
extend
protection
species
wildlife
covered
lacey
act
plants
presently
covered
foreign
government
encouraged
protect
broad
variety
species
legal
mechanisms
supportive
governments
pp
iii
district
found
evidentiary
hearing
parts
hughes
test
satisfied
appeals
disagreed
conclude
appeals
erred
setting
aside
findings
district
explain
need
discuss
proceedings
detail
evidentiary
hearing
district
based
conclusions
one
magistrate
three
scientific
experts
testified
prosecution
one
defense
prosecution
experts
testified
live
baitfish
imported
state
posed
two
significant
threats
maine
unique
fragile
fisheries
first
maine
population
wild
fish
including
indigenous
golden
shiners
placed
risk
three
types
parasites
prevalent
baitfish
common
wild
fish
maine
see
app
second
nonnative
species
inadvertently
included
shipments
live
baitfish
disturb
maine
aquatic
ecology
unpredictable
extent
competing
native
fish
food
habitat
preying
native
species
disrupting
environment
subtle
ways
see
prosecution
experts
testified
satisfactory
way
inspect
shipments
live
baitfish
parasites
commingled
species
according
testimony
small
size
baitfish
large
quantities
shipped
made
inspection
commingled
species
physical
impossibility
parasite
inspection
posed
separate
set
difficulties
examination
procedure
required
destruction
fish
although
statistical
sampling
inspection
techniques
developed
salmonids
salmon
trout
shipment
certified
based
standardized
examination
fish
scientifically
accepted
procedures
sort
available
baitfish
see
appellee
expert
denied
scientific
justification
supported
maine
total
ban
importation
baitfish
testified
none
three
parasites
discussed
prosecution
witnesses
posed
significant
threat
fish
wild
sampling
techniques
developed
baitfish
precisely
need
testified
professional
baitfish
farmers
raise
fish
ponds
freshly
drained
ensure
species
inadvertently
collected
weighing
testimony
magistrate
concluded
prongs
hughes
test
satisfied
accordingly
appellee
motion
dismiss
indictment
denied
appellee
filed
objections
district
independent
review
evidence
reached
conclusions
first
found
maine
clearly
legitimate
substantial
purpose
prohibiting
importation
live
bait
fish
substantial
uncertainties
surrounded
effects
baitfish
parasites
state
unique
population
wild
fish
consequences
introducing
nonnative
species
similarly
unpredictable
second
concluded
less
discriminatory
means
protecting
threats
currently
unavailable
particular
testing
procedures
baitfish
parasites
yet
devised
even
procedures
sort
effective
found
development
probably
take
considerable
amount
time
although
appeals
expressly
set
aside
district
finding
legitimate
local
purpose
noted
several
factors
cast
doubt
finding
first
maine
apparently
state
bar
importation
live
baitfish
see
second
maine
accepted
interstate
shipments
freshwater
fish
subject
inspection
requirement
third
aura
economic
protectionism
surrounded
statements
made
maine
department
inland
fisheries
wildlife
opposition
proposal
appellee
repeal
ban
ibid
finally
noted
parasites
nonnative
species
transported
maine
shipments
nonbaitfish
nothing
prevented
fish
simply
swimming
state
new
hampshire
despite
indications
protectionist
intent
appeals
rested
invalidation
maine
import
ban
different
basis
concluding
maine
demonstrated
legitimate
local
purpose
served
ban
promoted
equally
well
without
discriminating
heavily
interstate
commerce
specifically
found
difficult
reconcile
maine
claim
rely
sampling
inspection
state
reliance
similar
procedures
case
freshwater
fish
following
reversal
appellee
conviction
maine
petitioned
rehearing
ground
appeals
improperly
disregarded
district
findings
fact
denied
petitions
concluding
since
unavailability
less
discriminatory
alternative
mixed
finding
law
fact
reviewing
free
examine
carefully
factual
record
draw
conclusions
although
proffered
justification
local
discrimination
interstate
commerce
must
subjected
strictest
scrutiny
hughes
oklahoma
empirical
component
scrutiny
like
form
factfinding
basic
responsibility
district
courts
rather
appellate
courts
swint
quoting
demarco
frequently
emphasized
appellate
courts
decide
factual
questions
de
novo
reversing
findings
made
differently
see
anderson
bessemer
city
zenith
radio
hazeltine
research
federal
rules
criminal
procedure
contain
counterpart
federal
rule
civil
procedure
expressly
provides
findings
fact
made
trial
judge
shall
set
aside
unless
clearly
erroneous
considerations
underlying
rule
demands
judicial
efficiency
expertise
developed
trial
judges
importance
firsthand
observation
see
anderson
supra
apply
full
force
criminal
context
least
respect
factual
questions
nothing
guilt
accordingly
clearly
erroneous
standard
review
long
applied
nonguilt
findings
fact
district
courts
criminal
cases
see
campbell
wright
federal
practice
procedure
ed
need
decide
whether
findings
reviewed
clearly
erroneous
standard
appellee
concedes
standard
applies
factual
findings
made
district
case
see
tr
oral
arg
note
however
broader
review
authorized
simply
constitutional
case
factual
findings
issue
may
determine
outcome
case
see
bose
consumers
union
swint
matter
one
describes
abstract
issue
whether
alternative
means
promote
local
purpose
well
without
discriminating
interstate
commerce
hughes
oklahoma
specific
question
whether
scientifically
accepted
techniques
exist
sampling
inspection
live
baitfish
one
fact
district
finding
techniques
devised
characterized
clearly
erroneous
indeed
record
probably
support
contrary
finding
two
prosecution
witnesses
testified
lack
procedures
appellee
expert
conceded
point
although
disagreed
need
tests
see
app
maine
allowed
importation
freshwater
fish
inspection
hardly
demonstrates
district
clearly
erred
crediting
corroborated
uncontradicted
expert
testimony
standardized
inspection
techniques
yet
developed
baitfish
particularly
text
permit
statute
suggests
designed
specifically
regulate
importation
salmonids
experts
testified
testing
procedures
developed
appellee
argue
sampling
inspection
procedures
already
exist
baitfish
contends
procedures
easily
developed
brief
appellee
perhaps
also
appeals
meant
suggest
unlike
proposition
techniques
already
exist
contention
readily
devised
enjoys
support
record
appellee
expert
testified
developing
techniques
require
experts
field
get
together
app
gave
estimate
time
expense
involved
however
one
prosecution
experts
testified
development
testing
procedures
salmonids
required
years
heavily
financed
research
see
light
testimony
say
district
clearly
erred
concluding
development
sampling
inspection
techniques
baitfish
expected
take
significant
amount
time
importantly
agree
district
abstract
possibility
developing
acceptable
testing
procedures
particularly
assurance
effectiveness
make
procedures
vailabl
nondiscriminatory
alternativ
hunt
purpose
commerce
clause
state
must
make
reasonable
efforts
avoid
restraining
free
flow
commerce
across
borders
required
develop
new
unproven
means
protection
uncertain
cost
appellee
course
free
work
conjunction
bait
dealers
develop
scientifically
acceptable
sampling
inspection
procedures
golden
shiners
procedures
developed
maine
longer
may
able
justify
import
ban
state
need
join
efforts
however
need
pretend
already
succeeded
although
appeals
expressly
overturn
district
finding
maine
import
ban
serves
legitimate
local
purpose
appellee
argues
alternative
ground
affirmance
finding
rejected
reviewing
expert
testimony
presented
magistrate
however
say
district
clearly
erred
finding
substantial
scientific
uncertainty
surrounds
effect
baitfish
parasites
nonnative
species
maine
fisheries
moreover
agree
district
maine
legitimate
interest
guarding
imperfectly
understood
environmental
risks
despite
possibility
may
ultimately
prove
negligible
constitutional
principles
underlying
commerce
clause
read
requiring
state
maine
sit
idly
wait
potentially
irreversible
environmental
damage
occurred
scientific
community
agrees
disease
organisms
dangerous
acts
avoid
consequences
think
much
doubt
cast
legitimacy
maine
purposes
appeals
took
signs
protectionist
intent
shielding
industries
competition
almost
never
legitimate
local
purpose
state
laws
amount
simple
economic
protectionism
consequently
subject
virtually
per
se
rule
invalidity
philadelphia
new
jersey
accord
minnesota
clover
leaf
creamery
little
reason
case
believe
legitimate
justifications
state
put
forward
statute
merely
sham
post
hoc
rationalization
hughes
suggesting
contrary
appeals
relied
heavily
passage
near
end
statement
submitted
maine
department
inland
fisheries
wildlife
opposition
appellee
proposed
repeal
state
ban
importation
live
baitfish
ca
help
asking
spend
money
arkansas
far
better
spent
home
clear
much
done
maine
provide
sportsmen
safe
bait
also
possibility
industry
develop
lucrative
export
market
neighboring
quoting
baitfish
importation
position
maine
department
inland
fisheries
wildlife
app
evidence
protectionism
identified
appeals
persuasive
fact
maine
allows
importation
salmonids
standardized
sampling
inspection
procedures
available
hardly
demonstrates
maine
legitimate
interest
prohibiting
importation
baitfish
procedures
yet
devised
demonstrated
fact
may
enacted
similar
bans
especially
given
testimony
maine
fisheries
unique
unusually
fragile
finally
little
relevance
fish
swim
directly
maine
new
hampshire
magistrate
explained
impediments
complete
success
ground
preventing
state
using
best
efforts
limit
environmental
risk
iv
commerce
clause
significantly
limits
ability
localities
regulate
otherwise
burden
flow
interstate
commerce
elevate
free
trade
values
long
state
needlessly
obstruct
interstate
trade
attempt
place
position
economic
isolation
baldwin
seelig
retains
broad
regulatory
authority
protect
health
safety
citizens
integrity
natural
resources
evidence
case
amply
supports
district
findings
maine
ban
importation
live
baitfish
serves
legitimate
local
purposes
adequately
served
available
nondiscriminatory
alternatives
case
arbitrary
discrimination
interstate
commerce
record
suggests
maine
legitimate
reasons
apart
origin
treat
baitfish
differently
philadelphia
new
jersey
judgment
appeals
setting
aside
appellee
conviction
therefore
reversed
ordered
footnotes
section
reads
full
cases
courts
appeals
may
reviewed
following
methods
writ
certiorari
granted
upon
petition
party
civil
criminal
case
rendition
judgment
decree
appeal
party
relying
state
statute
held
appeals
invalid
repugnant
constitution
treaties
laws
appeal
shall
preclude
review
writ
certiorari
instance
appellant
review
appeal
shall
restricted
federal
questions
presented
certification
time
appeals
question
law
civil
criminal
case
instructions
desired
upon
certification
may
give
binding
instructions
require
entire
record
sent
decision
entire
matter
controversy
congress
amended
judicial
code
read
follows
case
circuit
appeals
drawn
question
validity
statute
state
ground
repugnant
constitution
treaties
laws
decision
validity
may
election
party
relying
state
statute
taken
review
writ
error
appeal
event
review
certiorari
shall
allowed
instance
party
review
writ
error
appeal
shall
restricted
examination
decision
federal
questions
presented
case
act
stat
appeals
allowed
right
decisions
courts
appeals
civil
cases
involving
arising
diversity
admiralty
patent
revenue
jurisdiction
federal
courts
see
act
mar
stat
relevant
portion
act
added
floor
senate
debates
surrounding
amendment
contain
suggestion
intended
apply
civil
cases
see
cong
rec
even
case
fell
outside
scope
still
discretion
grant
review
writ
certiorari
see
doran
salem
inn
el
paso
simmons
filed
timely
notice
appeal
app
later
moved
appeals
dismiss
appeal
ecause
acting
solicitor
general
determined
cases
entitled
priority
selecting
limited
number
cases
government
ask
review
brief
appeals
granted
government
motion
app
title
provides
action
suit
proceeding
state
agency
officer
employee
thereof
party
wherein
constitutionality
statute
state
affecting
public
interest
drawn
question
shall
certify
fact
attorney
general
state
shall
permit
state
intervene
presentation
evidence
evidence
otherwise
admissible
case
argument
question
constitutionality
state
shall
subject
applicable
provisions
law
rights
party
subject
liabilities
party
costs
extent
necessary
proper
presentation
facts
law
relating
question
constitutionality
advises
us
intend
seek
dismissal
indictment
maine
prevails
see
brief
one
prosecution
witness
testified
maine
lakes
contain
unusually
clean
water
originally
supported
rather
delicate
community
species
fish
app
another
stressed
state
real
landlocked
salmon
fishing
come
maine
live
maine
two
types
parasites
found
appellee
confiscated
shipment
golden
shiners
see
taylor
supp
although
appellee
shipment
found
contain
fish
golden
shiners
contain
polliwogs
crustacean
crawfish
app
testimony
suggesting
pose
ecological
risks
nonnative
fish
see
expert
examined
appellee
shipment
testified
although
inspection
shipment
revealed
two
three
parasites
described
prevalent
baitfish
outside
maine
certainly
put
signature
certificate
say
none
third
parasite
present
lot
shipment
intercepted
case
contained
approximately
fish
specimens
pound
according
prosecution
testimony
design
sampling
inspection
techniques
must
take
account
particular
parasites
concern
baitfish
parasites
differ
salmonid
parasites
see
appellee
expert
agreed
also
testimony
physical
layout
bait
farms
makes
inspection
source
shipment
particularly
difficult
border
inspections
feasible
fish
die
time
takes
complete
tests
several
reasons
district
discounted
testimony
appellee
expert
baitfish
parasites
pose
serious
threat
disease
organisms
found
salmonids
noted
considerable
scientific
debate
surrounded
even
threat
posed
salmonid
diseases
appellee
expert
testified
largely
effects
baitfish
parasites
commercial
hatcheries
rather
wild
unfamiliar
northeast
fisheries
district
approved
magistrate
general
finding
obviously
workable
alternatives
outright
prohibition
importation
neither
magistrate
made
specific
finding
whether
maine
adequately
protect
inadvertent
introduction
nonnative
species
allowing
baitfish
imported
professional
bait
farmers
using
freshly
drained
ponds
conflicting
evidence
point
appellee
expert
suggested
methods
largely
eliminated
problem
commingled
species
app
prosecution
witness
testified
complete
success
unlikely
see
also
prosecution
testimony
shipments
screened
reliably
commingled
species
business
living
material
move
ca
hold
tanks
kind
thing
length
time
position
resolve
factual
dispute
conclude
event
district
findings
regarding
parasites
adequately
support
constitutionality
challenged
statute
also
noted
restriction
number
size
importations
less
restrictive
total
ban
identified
reason
believe
restriction
protect
parasites
commingled
species
effectively
ban
support
conclusion
free
examine
carefully
factual
record
draw
conclusions
appeals
cited
bacchus
imports
dias
boston
stock
exchange
state
tax
question
cases
whether
given
set
facts
amounted
discrimination
forbidden
commerce
clause
neither
case
reject
underlying
factual
findings
made
trial
indeed
findings
reject
facts
stipulated
bacchus
see
boston
stock
exchange
decided
motion
dismiss
see
statute
provides
commissioner
may
grant
permits
importation
freshwater
fish
upon
application
describes
fish
source
includes
statement
recognized
fish
pathologist
college
university
state
conservation
department
fish
wildlife
service
certifying
fish
sources
show
evidence
viral
hemorrhagic
septicemia
infectious
pancreatic
necrosis
infectious
hematopoietic
necrosis
myxosomo
cerebralis
diseases
may
threaten
fish
stocks
within
state
rev
stat
tit
emphasis
added
listed
diseases
identified
hearing
magistrate
salmonid
disorders
see
app
rule
applied
laws
motivated
solely
desire
protect
local
industries
competition
also
laws
respond
legitimate
local
concerns
discriminating
arbitrarily
interstate
trade
evil
protectionism
reside
legislative
means
well
legislative
ends
philadelphia
new
jersey
held
example
new
jersey
may
conserve
disposal
capacity
landfill
sites
banning
importation
wastes
see
oklahoma
may
fight
depletion
population
natural
minnows
prohibiting
commercial
exportation
see
hughes
oklahoma
case
residents
forced
bear
brunt
conservation
program
apparent
reason
lived
voted
see
philadelphia
new
jersey
hughes
intentional
barriers
interstate
trade
protectionist
however
commerce
clause
guaranty
right
import
state
whatever
one
may
please
absent
prohibition
congress
regardless
effects
importation
upon
local
community
robertson
california
even
overt
discrimination
interstate
trade
may
justified
case
goods
services
particularly
likely
reason
threaten
health
safety
state
citizens
integrity
natural
resources
outright
prohibition
entry
rather
intermediate
form
regulation
effective
method
protecti
lewis
bt
investment
managers
district
address
appellee
argument
import
ban
protectionist
believe
appellee
objected
magistrate
rejection
argument
see
appeals
disagreed
concluding
appellee
objections
magistrate
recommended
decision
incorporated
arguments
included
motion
dismiss
see
objections
filed
district
appellee
specifically
contend
statute
protectionist
concluded
asking
indictment
dismissed
reasons
stated
herein
also
reasons
stated
defendant
memorandum
law
support
motion
dismiss
defendant
objection
magistrate
recommended
decision
defendant
motion
dismiss
indictment
mar
emphasis
added
think
magistrate
clearly
right
reject
argument
maine
bait
statute
constitutes
economic
protectionism
need
decide
whether
catchall
language
sufficed
preserve
argument
later
review
cf
thomas
arn
import
ban
originally
enacted
see
acts
ch
although
maine
flat
statutory
ban
importation
live
baitfish
apparently
unique
minnesota
prohibits
use
imported
minnows
bait
purposes
xcept
otherwise
specifically
permitted
stat
subd
several
require
administrative
approval
importation
introduction
live
fish
see
utah
code
ann
code
stat
supp
cf
codified
laws
minnows
may
transported
south
dakota
pursuant
permit
granted
authority
wildlife
agencies
prohibit
importation
particular
species
see
code
stat
cf
rev
stat
state
wildlife
commission
empowered
regulate
prohibit
use
live
bait
fishing
end
undesirable
species
fish
intentionally
unintentionally
may
introduced
public
waters
state
justice
stevens
dissenting
something
fishy
case
maine
state
union
blatantly
discriminates
baitfish
flatly
prohibiting
importation
although
golden
shiners
already
present
thriving
maine
perhaps
coincidentally
subject
flourishing
domestic
industry
maine
excludes
golden
shiners
grown
harvested
perhaps
coincidentally
sold
kind
stark
discrimination
articles
commerce
requires
rigorous
justification
discriminating
state
discrimination
commerce
type
found
demonstrated
burden
falls
state
justify
terms
local
benefits
flowing
statute
unavailability
nondiscriminatory
alternatives
adequate
preserve
local
interests
stake
hunt
washington
state
apple
advertising
like
district
concludes
uncertainty
possible
ecological
effects
possible
presence
parasites
nonnative
species
shipments
shiners
suffices
carry
state
burden
proving
legitimate
public
purpose
ante
similarly
concludes
state
obligation
develop
feasible
inspection
procedures
make
total
ban
unnecessary
ante
seems
clear
however
presumption
run
way
since
state
engages
obvious
discrimination
commerce
put
proof
ambiguity
dangers
alternatives
actually
defeat
rather
sustain
discriminatory
measure
derogate
state
interest
ecological
purity
invocation
environmental
protection
public
health
never
thought
confer
kind
special
dispensation
general
principle
nondiscrimination
interstate
commerce
different
view
ordinance
valid
simply
professes
health
measure
mean
commerce
clause
imposes
restraints
state
action
laid
due
process
clause
save
rare
instance
state
artlessly
discloses
avowed
purpose
discriminate
interstate
goods
dean
milk
madison
maine
wishes
rely
interest
ecological
preservation
must
show
interest
infeasibility
alternatives
far
greater
specificity
otherwise
must
asserted
interest
manner
far
less
offensive
notions
comity
cooperation
underlie
commerce
clause
significantly
appeals
familiar
maine
natural
resources
legislation
concerned
uniqueness
maine
ban
felt
maine
unquestionable
natural
splendor
notwithstanding
state
carried
substantial
burden
proving
meet
environmental
concerns
manner
interest
health
fish
ecology
cf
ante
describing
less
restrictive
procedures
respectfully
dissent