universal
argued
decided
december
information
fair
labor
standards
act
appellees
charged
counts
violating
minimum
wage
overtime
provisions
act
district
dismissed
three
counts
one
section
violated
held
order
district
affirmed
without
prejudice
amendment
information
pp
section
fair
labor
standards
act
penalizes
course
conduct
read
enabling
prosecutor
treat
separate
offense
breach
statutory
duty
owed
single
employee
workweek
pp
supp
affirmed
district
dismissed
three
counts
information
fair
labor
standards
act
supp
appeal
affirmed
john
davis
argued
cause
brief
acting
solicitor
general
stern
assistant
attorney
general
murray
beatrice
rosenberg
bishop
william
tyson
bessie
margolin
philip
perlman
solicitor
general
statement
jurisdiction
melbourne
bergerman
argued
cause
appellees
brief
aaron
lewittes
seymour
kleinman
james
aylward
justice
frankfurter
delivered
opinion
case
arises
information
fair
labor
standards
act
stat
amended
stat
charging
defendant
corporation
division
operations
manager
two
successive
branch
managers
violations
minimum
wage
overtime
provisions
act
counts
laid
six
failure
act
pay
minimum
wages
twenty
violation
overtime
provisions
six
failure
comply
requirements
counts
charge
minimum
wage
violations
six
separate
weeks
one
per
week
one
employee
one
week
three
employees
counts
charge
overtime
violations
twenty
separate
weeks
one
per
week
total
eleven
employees
involved
two
violations
charged
nine
employees
counts
charge
violations
four
employees
two
violations
two
employees
charged
section
act
subjects
employer
offending
first
time
maximum
fine
violation
provision
district
assumed
authorize
fine
upon
conviction
information
rejecting
reading
whereby
prosecutor
treat
separate
offense
breach
statutory
duty
owed
single
employee
single
workweek
district
granted
defendant
motion
dismiss
three
counts
information
held
course
conduct
rather
separate
items
course
constitutes
punishable
offense
ordered
consolidation
separate
acts
set
forth
information
three
counts
charging
one
violation
review
decision
government
brought
case
criminal
appeals
act
stat
problem
construction
criminal
provisions
fair
labor
standards
act
easy
solution
congress
made
allowable
unit
prosecution
issue
us
answered
merely
literal
reading
penalizing
sections
generalities
statutory
construction
help
us
little
rules
law
merely
axioms
experience
boston
sand
solve
special
difficulties
construing
particular
statute
variables
render
every
problem
statutory
construction
unique
see
jin
fuey
moy
reason
may
utilize
construing
statute
unambiguous
light
relevantly
shed
upon
words
clause
statute
express
purpose
congress
early
chief
justice
marshall
told
us
mind
labors
discover
design
legislature
seizes
every
thing
aid
derived
fisher
cranch
particularly
construe
statutes
defining
conduct
entail
stigma
penalties
prison
penal
statutes
subject
basic
consideration
legislation
like
writings
given
insofar
language
permits
commonsensical
meaning
choice
made
two
readings
conduct
congress
made
crime
appropriate
choose
harsher
alternative
require
congress
spoken
language
clear
definite
derive
criminal
outlawry
ambiguous
implication
penal
provision
fair
labor
standards
act
part
scheme
available
government
employee
enforcing
act
preventive
remedy
injunction
individual
class
actions
restitution
damages
also
available
remedies
frequently
invoked
effective
achieving
purposes
act
course
various
remedies
must
read
relation
asked
addition
infer
employer
failure
perform
obligations
employee
creates
separate
criminal
offense
provisions
civil
liability
expressly
recognize
right
individual
employee
maintain
separate
action
employer
restitution
damages
argument
cuts
ways
congress
wanted
attach
criminal
consequences
separate
civil
liability
easily
said
difficulty
stating
explicitly
unit
civil
liability
owing
employee
instead
balancing
various
generalized
axioms
experience
construing
legislation
regard
specific
history
legislative
process
culminated
act
us
affords
solid
ground
giving
appropriate
meaning
originally
introduced
congress
bill
fair
labor
standards
act
evolved
two
separate
penalty
provisions
one
underpayments
violation
one
failure
comply
provisions
provision
set
maximum
fine
explicitly
defined
constituted
separate
offense
employee
unit
criminal
offense
week
violation
separate
offense
measure
wound
way
long
legislative
process
resulted
consolidation
two
penalty
provisions
elimination
separate
offense
clauses
substitution
maximum
fine
rather
striking
changes
afford
justifiable
ground
giving
less
harsh
therefore
reasonable
construction
portions
legislation
addition
illuminating
statements
houses
concerning
separation
offenses
although
separate
offense
clause
violations
deleted
early
legislative
process
separate
offense
clause
attacked
debate
precisely
authorize
sort
multiplication
offenses
number
employees
information
us
represents
indeed
multiplication
information
goes
beyond
even
original
bills
authorized
underpayments
employees
split
separate
counts
information
violations
week
split
serve
basis
separate
counts
claim
one
answer
possible
problem
history
legislation
inexplicitness
language
weigh
government
construction
statute
said
decisively
clear
face
one
way
history
language
legislation
case
attracted
respective
authority
two
cases
pressed
upon
us
snow
blockburger
district
judge
therefore
correct
rejecting
government
construction
statute
offense
made
punishable
fair
labor
standards
act
course
conduct
reading
statute
compendiously
treats
one
offense
violations
arise
singleness
thought
purpose
action
may
deemed
single
impulse
conception
recognized
blockburger
case
supra
quoting
wharton
criminal
law
ed
merely
illustrate
without
attempting
rule
specific
situations
wholly
unjustifiable
managerial
decision
certain
activity
work
therefore
require
compensation
standards
turned
multiplicity
offenses
considering
underpayment
single
week
single
employee
separate
offense
however
wholly
distinct
managerial
decision
piece
workers
paid
less
statutory
requirement
terms
hourly
rates
see
rosenwasser
involves
different
course
conduct
constitute
different
offense
thus
underpayments
based
violations
statute
piece
workers
compounded
single
offense
unrelated
underpayments
resulted
decision
certain
activity
work
merely
two
kinds
underpayments
occurred
workweek
involved
employee
whether
aggregate
acts
constitute
single
course
conduct
therefore
single
offense
one
may
capable
ascertainment
merely
bare
allegations
information
may
await
trial
facts
information
based
find
improper
theory
draftsman
indictment
may
charge
crime
variety
forms
avoid
fatal
variance
evidence
may
cast
indictment
several
counts
whether
body
facts
upon
indictment
based
gives
rise
one
criminal
offense
one
sure
defendant
may
call
upon
prosecutor
elect
asking
bill
particulars
render
various
counts
specific
event
indictment
multiple
counts
prosecutor
gives
necessary
notice
less
conclusion
government
case
defendant
may
insist
counts
merely
variants
single
offense
affirming
order
without
prejudice
amendment
information
mean
suggest
amendment
increase
number
offenses
may
made
trial
begun
government
precluded
amending
information
either
meet
exigencies
evidence
charge
separate
offenses
separate
courses
conduct
substantive
provision
decide
district
judge
correctly
held
single
course
conduct
constitute
one
offense
fair
labor
standards
act
without
prejudice
amendment
information
trial
evidence
offered
warrants
order
affirmed
footnotes
supp
modified
order
dated
march
government
urges
act
construed
punish
failure
comply
duty
imposed
act
employee
workweek
record
required
kept
brief
however
none
first
counts
charging
minimum
wage
overtime
underpayments
similar
violations
charged
two
employees
week
sufficient
case
urge
violations
may
split
according
workweek
rather
also
according
employee
last
six
counts
charging
violations
might
possible
government
urge
less
record
required
kept
separate
offense
one
minor
exception
violations
alleged
least
two
employees
every
workweek
violations
charged
workweek
unit
prosecution
since
periods
time
six
counts
range
seven
weeks
six
months
employee
also
unit
since
although
violations
employee
made
separate
charges
two
employees
subject
two
charges
apiece
whatever
differences
exist
minimum
necessary
sustain
particular
information
claim
made
government
immaterial
view
disposition
case
appellee
urge
case
prescribes
one
offense
even
three
kinds
violations
argument
seems
made
rejected
distinct
requirements
two
different
sections
act
involved
blockburger
penal
provision
applied
person
violates
fails
comply
requirements
act
see
sess
clause
read
employment
employee
violation
provision
act
order
unlawful
employee
employed
violation
provision
shall
constitute
separate
offense
clause
week
failure
keep
records
required
act
furnish
board
authorized
representative
board
shall
constitute
separate
offense
see
cong
rec
cong
rec
cong
rec
force
added
statements
fact
one
made
member
house
proposed
amendment
adopted
vote
division
specifically
delete
separate
offense
clause
cong
rec
bill
thus
came
conference
house
separate
offense
clauses
deleted
senate
clause
deleted
versions
still
provided
maximum
fine
conference
accepted
house
version
neither
separate
offense
clause
raised
maximum
fine
see
reported
committee
july
cong
rec
sess
cong
rec
conference
report
cong
rec
justice
douglas
dissenting
think
question
whether
employer
violated
criminal
provisions
act
determined
reference
done
particular
employee
act
speak
course
conduct
terminology
act
act
requires
employer
pay
employees
less
cents
hour
prohibits
employing
employees
hours
week
unless
overtime
paid
requires
keep
records
persons
employed
wages
hours
etc
amended
act
makes
unlawful
employer
violate
provisions
sections
therefore
seems
clear
employer
pays
one
employee
less
cents
hour
fails
pay
overtime
one
employee
fails
keep
required
records
one
employee
crime
established
scienter
shown
seems
equally
clear
employer
wilfully
fails
pay
one
employee
minimum
wage
wilfully
fails
pay
required
overtime
wilfully
fails
keep
required
records
three
crimes
committed
crime
defined
reference
individual
employee
crime
may
single
isolated
act
may
may
recurring
continuous
violation
may
affect
one
employee
one
week
one
month
another
employee
another
week
another
month
may
affect
one
employee
one
way
another
employee
different
way
violations
may
continuous
follow
set
pattern
may
sporadic
erratic
act
differentiate
nothing
said
course
conduct
perhaps
committee
congress
receptive
suggestion
made
received
course
horrendous
possibilities
envisaged
almost
every
law
prosecutors
enforce
act
grand
juries
hear
evidence
violations
district
courts
apply
sanctions
date
made
criminal
provisions
oppressive
beyond
reason
yet
case
far
learn
ever
inventive
genius
suggest
course
conduct
rather
employee
unit
crime