liberty
mutual
ins
wetzel
argued
january
decided
march
respondents
filed
complaint
alleging
petitioner
employee
insurance
benefits
maternity
leave
regulations
discriminated
women
employees
violation
title
vii
civil
rights
act
seeking
injunctive
relief
damages
costs
attorneys
fees
ruling
respondents
favor
motion
partial
summary
judgment
issue
petitioner
liability
act
district
upon
denying
petitioner
motion
reconsideration
issued
amended
order
stating
injunctive
relief
withheld
petitioner
filed
appeal
asked
stay
injunction
directing
pursuant
fed
rule
civ
proc
final
judgment
entered
respondents
reason
delay
appeals
holding
jurisdiction
petitioner
appeal
affirmed
merits
held
district
order
appealable
final
decision
pp
even
assuming
order
declaratory
judgment
issue
liability
nevertheless
left
unresolved
finally
dispose
respondents
prayers
relief
order
become
appealable
final
decision
pursuant
merely
made
recital
required
rule
since
rule
applies
actions
one
less
claims
finally
decided
found
otherwise
ready
appeal
apply
action
one
complaint
advanced
single
legal
theory
applied
one
set
facts
pp
order
apart
reference
rule
constitutes
grant
partial
summary
judgment
limited
issue
petitioner
liability
terms
interlocutory
damages
relief
remain
resolved
considered
final
within
meaning
order
appealable
pursuant
provisions
interlocutory
appeals
pp
even
order
insofar
failed
include
requested
injunctive
relief
considered
interlocutory
order
refusing
injunction
within
meaning
thus
allowed
respondents
obtain
review
appeals
denial
injunction
sought
petitioner
avail
grant
jurisdiction
pp
even
order
considered
order
district
certified
immediate
appeal
pursuant
involving
controlling
question
law
substantial
ground
difference
opinion
appear
petitioner
applied
appeals
permission
appeal
within
days
required
moreover
assurance
requirements
met
appeals
exercised
discretion
entertain
interlocutory
appeal
rehnquist
delivered
opinion
members
joined
except
blackmun
took
part
consideration
decision
case
kalvin
grove
argued
cause
petitioner
briefs
lawrence
cohen
jeffrey
goldman
robert
penney
howard
specter
argued
cause
filed
brief
respondents
briefs
amici
curiae
urging
reversal
filed
gordon
dean
booth
alaska
airlines
et
al
edward
silver
larry
lavinsky
sara
portnoy
kenneth
kimble
american
life
insurance
assn
et
al
william
martin
paul
blume
american
mutual
insurance
alliance
et
al
thompson
powers
american
telephone
telegraph
simon
rifkind
frazer
hilder
edmond
dilworth
general
motors
richard
godown
national
association
manufacturers
lloyd
sutter
et
al
john
wayman
scott
zimmerman
westinghouse
electric
briefs
amici
curiae
urging
affirmance
filed
solicitor
general
bork
assistant
attorney
general
pottinger
brian
landsberg
walter
barnett
abner
sibal
joseph
eddins
beatrice
rosenberg
et
al
francis
bellotti
attorney
general
barbara
rouse
terry
jean
seligmann
assistant
attorneys
general
commonwealth
massachusetts
et
al
william
brown
attorney
general
andrew
ruzicho
earl
manz
assistant
attorneys
general
state
ohio
henry
spitz
paul
hartman
new
york
state
division
human
rights
ruth
bader
ginsburg
melvin
wulf
david
rubin
american
civil
liberties
union
et
al
albert
woll
laurence
gold
stephen
schlossberg
john
fillion
american
federation
labor
congress
industrial
organizations
et
al
diane
serafin
blank
nancy
stanley
blank
goodman
kelly
rone
stanley
wendy
williams
rhonda
copelon
sylvia
roberts
marilyn
hall
patel
judith
lonnquist
gladys
kessler
peter
hart
weiner
center
constitutional
rights
et
al
mary
jonathan
lubell
howard
ostrin
charles
koons
communication
workers
america
justice
rehnquist
delivered
opinion
respondents
filed
complaint
district
western
district
pennsylvania
asserted
petitioner
employee
insurance
benefits
maternity
leave
regulations
discriminated
women
violation
title
vii
civil
rights
act
stat
amended
equal
employment
opportunity
act
et
seq
ed
supp
iv
district
ruled
favor
respondents
issue
petitioner
liability
act
petitioner
appealed
appeals
third
circuit
held
jurisdiction
petitioner
appeal
proceeded
affirm
merits
judgment
district
granted
certiorari
heard
argument
merits
though
neither
party
questioned
jurisdiction
appeals
entertain
appeal
obligated
motion
question
thereto
exists
mansfield
coldwater
lake
michigan
swan
conclude
district
order
appealable
appeals
vacate
judgment
appeals
instructions
dismiss
petitioner
appeal
order
district
respondents
complaint
alleging
jurisdiction
facts
deemed
pertinent
claim
prayed
judgment
petitioner
embodying
following
relief
requiring
defendant
establish
hiring
payment
opportunity
promotional
plans
programs
enjoining
continuance
defendant
illegal
acts
practices
alleged
herein
requiring
defendant
pay
plaintiffs
members
class
damages
sustained
plaintiffs
members
class
reason
defendant
illegal
acts
practices
including
adjusted
backpay
interest
additional
equal
amount
liquidated
damages
exemplary
damages
requiring
defendant
pay
plaintiffs
members
class
costs
suit
reasonable
attorneys
fee
interest
relief
deems
appropriate
app
order
stated
enjoin
continuance
practices
found
violation
title
vii
plaintiffs
invited
submit
form
injunction
order
defendant
filed
notice
appeal
asked
stay
injunctive
order
circumstances
withhold
issuance
injunctive
order
amend
order
previously
issued
provisions
fed
civ
follows
day
february
directed
final
judgment
entered
favor
plaintiffs
defendant
policy
requiring
female
employees
return
work
within
three
months
delivery
child
terminated
violation
provisions
title
vii
civil
rights
act
defendant
policy
denying
disability
income
protection
plan
benefits
female
employees
disabilities
related
pregnancies
childbirth
sic
violation
title
vii
civil
rights
act
expressly
directed
judgment
entered
plaintiffs
upon
claims
plaintiffs
complaint
reason
delay
supp
counsel
respondents
questioned
oral
argument
suggested
least
district
order
february
amounted
declaratory
judgment
issue
liability
pursuant
provisions
respondents
sought
declaratory
judgment
form
relief
course
different
case
even
accept
respondents
contention
district
order
declaratory
judgment
issue
liability
nonetheless
left
unresolved
respondents
requests
injunction
compensatory
exemplary
damages
attorneys
fees
finally
disposed
none
respondents
prayers
relief
district
appeals
apparently
took
view
district
made
recital
required
fed
rule
civ
proc
final
judgment
entered
issue
liability
reason
delay
orders
thereby
became
appealable
final
decision
pursuant
agree
application
rule
statute
question
rule
apply
single
claim
action
limited
expressly
multiple
claims
actions
one
less
multiple
claims
finally
decided
found
otherwise
ready
appeal
sears
roebuck
mackey
however
respondents
set
forth
single
claim
petitioner
employee
insurance
benefits
maternity
leave
regulations
discriminated
women
employees
violation
title
vii
civil
rights
act
prayed
several
different
types
relief
event
sustained
allegations
complaint
see
fed
rule
civ
proc
complaint
advanced
single
legal
theory
applied
one
set
facts
thus
despite
fact
district
undoubtedly
made
findings
required
rule
applicable
findings
case
make
order
appealable
pursuant
see
mackey
supra
turn
consider
whether
district
order
might
appealed
petitioner
appeals
theory
order
viewed
apart
discussion
rule
constitutes
grant
partial
summary
judgment
limited
issue
petitioner
liability
judgments
terms
interlocutory
see
fed
rule
civ
proc
assessment
damages
awarding
relief
remains
resolved
never
considered
final
within
meaning
see
borges
art
steel
leonidakis
international
telecoin
tye
hertz
drivurself
stations
russell
barnes
foundation
thus
possible
authorization
appeal
district
order
pursuant
provisions
district
granted
injunctive
relief
ruled
respondents
requests
relief
interlocutory
order
appealable
noted
issue
injunction
might
argued
order
district
insofar
failed
include
injunctive
relief
requested
respondents
interlocutory
order
refusing
injunction
within
meaning
even
allowed
respondents
obtain
review
appeals
denial
injunction
sought
petitioner
avail
grant
jurisdiction
order
appealable
pursuant
although
district
findings
made
view
satisfying
rule
might
viewed
substantial
compliance
certification
requirement
section
showing
record
petitioner
made
application
appeals
within
days
therein
specified
holding
jurisdiction
pursuant
makes
clear
thought
obliged
consider
merits
petitioner
appeal
assurance
requirements
complied
appeals
exercised
discretion
entertain
interlocutory
appeal
sustain
procedure
followed
condone
practice
whereby
district
virtually
case
might
render
interlocutory
decision
question
liability
defendant
defendant
thereupon
permitted
appeal
appeals
without
satisfying
requirements
congress
carefully
set
forth
believe
congress
enacting
present
title
well
aware
dangers
overly
rigid
insistence
upon
final
decision
appeal
every
case
sections
made
ample
provision
appeal
orders
final
alleviate
possible
hardship
twist
fabric
statute
bear
agree
district
order
february
appealable
appeals
judgment
appeals
therefore
vacated
case
remanded
instructions
dismiss
petitioner
appeal
ordered
footnotes
judgment
upon
multiple
claims
involving
multiple
parties
one
claim
relief
presented
action
whether
claim
counterclaim
claim
multiple
parties
involved
may
direct
entry
final
judgment
one
fewer
claims
parties
upon
express
determination
reason
delay
upon
express
direction
entry
judgment
absence
determination
direction
order
form
decision
however
designated
adjudicates
fewer
claims
rights
liabilities
fewer
parties
shall
terminate
action
claims
parties
order
form
decision
subject
revision
time
entry
judgment
adjudicating
claims
rights
liabilities
parties
following
mackey
rule
amended
insure
orders
finally
disposing
parties
appealed
pursuant
provisions
provision
implicated
case
however
mackey
exposition
rule
remains
fully
accurate
need
attempt
definitive
resolution
meaning
constitutes
claim
relief
within
meaning
rules
see
moore
federal
practice
ed
sufficient
recognize
complaint
asserting
one
legal
right
even
seeking
multiple
remedies
alleged
violation
right
single
claim
relief
courts
appeals
shall
jurisdiction
appeals
interlocutory
orders
district
courts
district
district
canal
zone
district
guam
district
virgin
islands
judges
thereof
granting
continuing
modifying
refusing
dissolving
injunctions
refusing
dissolve
modify
injunctions
except
direct
review
may
district
judge
making
civil
action
order
otherwise
appealable
section
shall
opinion
order
involves
controlling
question
law
substantial
ground
difference
opinion
immediate
appeal
order
may
materially
advance
ultimate
termination
litigation
shall
state
writing
order
appeals
may
thereupon
discretion
permit
appeal
taken
order
application
made
within
ten
days
entry
order
provided
however
application
appeal
hereunder
shall
stay
proceedings
district
unless
district
judge
appeals
judge
thereof
shall
order