federal
communications
pottsville
argued
january
decided
january
robert
jackson
sol
petitioner
charles
drayton
eliot
lovett
washington
respondent
justice
frankfurter
delivered
opinion
issued
writ
mandamus
federal
communications
commission
important
issues
administrative
law
involved
brought
case
called
upon
ascertain
enforce
spheres
authority
congress
given
commission
courts
respectively
scheme
tion
radio
broadcasting
communications
act
stat
amended
act
may
stat
et
et
seq
adequate
appreciation
facts
presently
summarized
requires
set
legislative
framework
essentials
communications
act
derives
federal
radio
act
stat
amended
stat
act
congress
order
protect
national
interest
involved
new
science
broadcasting
formulated
unified
comprehensive
regulatory
system
industry
common
factors
administration
various
statutes
congress
supervised
different
modes
communication
led
creation
act
communications
commission
objectives
legislation
remained
substantially
unaltered
since
congress
moved
spur
widespread
fear
absence
governmental
control
public
interest
might
subordinated
monopolistic
domination
broadcasting
field
avoid
congress
provided
system
permits
licenses
licenses
granted
longer
three
years
communications
act
title
iii
license
create
right
beyond
terms
conditions
periods
license
ibid
granting
withholding
permits
construction
stations
granting
denying
modifying
revoking
licenses
operation
stations
convenience
interest
necessity
touchstone
exercise
commission
authority
criterion
concrete
complicated
factors
judgment
field
delegated
authority
permit
serves
supple
instrument
exercise
discretion
expert
body
congress
charged
carry
legislative
policy
necessarily
therefore
subordinate
questions
procedure
ascertaining
public
interest
commission
licensing
authority
scope
inquiry
whether
applications
heard
contemporaneously
successively
whether
parties
allowed
intervene
one
another
proceedings
similar
explicitly
implication
left
commission
devising
long
course
observes
basic
requirements
designed
protection
private
well
public
interest
title
underlying
whole
law
recognition
rapidly
fluctuating
factors
characteristic
evolution
broadcasting
corresponding
requirement
administrative
process
possess
sufficient
flexibility
adjust
factors
thus
highly
significant
although
investment
broadcasting
stations
may
large
license
may
issued
three
years
deciding
whether
renew
license
deciding
whether
issue
first
place
commission
must
judge
standard
convenience
interest
necessity
communications
act
designed
primarily
new
code
adjustment
conflicting
private
rights
adjudication
rather
expresses
desire
part
congress
maintain
appropriate
administrative
control
grip
dynamic
aspects
radio
transmission
background
facts
present
case
fall
proper
perspective
may
pottsville
broadcasting
company
respondent
sought
commission
permit
title
iii
construction
broadcasting
station
pottsville
pennsylvania
commission
denied
application
two
grounds
respondent
financially
disqualified
applicant
sufficiently
represent
local
interests
community
proposed
station
serve
denial
application
respondent
appealed
tribunal
withheld
judgment
second
ground
commission
decision
deem
controlled
commission
judgment
finding
commission
conclusion
regarding
respondent
lack
financial
qualification
based
erroneous
understanding
pennsylvania
law
appeals
reversed
decision
ordered
remanded
communications
commission
reconsideration
accordance
views
expressed
pottsville
broadcasting
federal
communications
commission
following
remand
respondent
petitioned
commission
grant
original
application
instead
commission
set
argument
respondent
application
along
two
rival
applications
facilities
latter
applications
filed
subsequently
respondent
hearings
held
commission
consolidated
proceeding
still
undisposed
respondent
case
returned
commission
three
applications
facilities
thus
facts
regarding
theretofore
explored
appropriate
procedure
commission
directed
three
set
argument
determine
comparative
basis
judgment
commission
best
serve
public
interest
stage
proceedings
respondents
sought
obtained
appeals
writ
mandamus
review
writ
commanded
commission
set
aside
order
designating
respondent
application
hearing
comparative
basis
two
hear
reconsider
application
pottsville
broadcasting
company
basis
record
originally
made
accordance
opinions
appeals
original
review
mandamus
proceedings
pottsville
broadcasting
federal
communications
commission
appeals
invoked
commission
familiar
doctrine
lower
bound
respect
mandate
appellate
tribunal
reconsider
questions
mandate
laid
rest
see
sanford
fork
tool
petitioner
proposition
indisputable
tell
us
issues
laid
rest
compare
sprague
ticonic
bank
interpretation
scope
mandate
necessarily
conclusive
sure
issues
mandate
normally
best
judge
content
general
theory
author
document
ordinarily
authoritative
interpreter
purposes
even
true
lower
interpretation
mandate
controlling
compare
morgan
therefore
foreclosed
interpretation
appeals
gave
mandate
even
directed
lower
much
deeper
issue
however
involved
mandate
administrative
agency
issue
relationship
federal
courts
inter
relationship
defined
largely
courts
due
observance
courts
distribution
authority
made
congress
power
regulate
commerce
reviewing
power
conferred
upon
courts
article
iii
constitution
review
federal
action
lower
one
phase
single
unified
process
extent
federal
authorized
review
administrative
act
superimposed
upon
enforcement
legislative
policy
administrative
control
different
process
administrative
action
review
ensued
technical
rules
derived
interrelationship
judicial
tribunals
forming
hierarchical
system
taken
environment
mechanically
applied
determine
extent
congressional
power
exercised
delegated
agency
controlled
within
limited
scope
power
conferred
congress
constitution
courts
like
organisms
represent
interplay
form
function
history
courts
less
narrowly
defined
range
staple
business
determined
basic
characteristics
trial
procedure
rules
evidence
general
principles
appellate
review
modern
administrative
tribunals
outgrowth
conditions
different
large
degree
response
felt
need
governmental
supervision
economic
supervision
effectively
exercised
neither
directly
legislation
judicial
process
movement
natural
extension
inevitable
quarter
century
ago
opinion
eminent
spokesmen
law
perhaps
striking
characteristic
movement
investiture
administrative
agencies
power
far
exceeding
different
conventional
judicial
modes
adjusting
conflicting
whereby
interested
litigants
define
scope
inquiry
determine
data
judicial
judgment
ultimately
based
administrative
agencies
power
initiate
inquiry
authority
invoked
control
range
investigation
ascertaining
satisfy
requirements
public
interest
relation
needs
vast
regions
sometimes
whole
nation
enjoyment
facilities
transportation
communication
essential
public
services
differences
origin
function
preclude
wholesale
transplantation
rules
procedure
trial
review
evolved
history
experience
courts
thus
recognized
bodies
like
interstate
commerce
commission
whose
congress
cast
recent
administrative
agencies
narrowly
constrained
technical
rules
admissibility
proof
interstate
commerce
commission
baird
free
fashion
rules
procedure
pursue
methods
inquiry
capable
permitting
discharge
multitudinous
duties
compare
new
england
divisions
case
sure
laws
agencies
operate
prescribe
fundamentals
fair
play
require
ested
parties
afforded
opportunity
hearing
judgment
must
express
reasoned
conclusion
assimilate
relation
administrative
bodies
courts
relationship
lower
upper
courts
disregard
origin
purposes
movement
administrative
regulation
time
disregard
traditional
scope
however
judicial
process
unless
vital
differentiations
functions
judicial
administrative
tribunals
observed
courts
stray
outside
province
read
laws
congress
distorting
lenses
inapplicable
legal
doctrine
radio
act
originally
passed
appeals
authorized
reviewing
action
radio
commission
revise
decision
appealed
enter
judgment
may
seem
radio
act
stat
thereby
appeals
constituted
superior
revising
agency
field
radio
commission
acted
federal
radio
comm
general
electric
since
power
thus
given
administrative
rather
judicial
appellate
jurisdiction
invoked
federal
radio
comm
general
electric
supra
lay
basis
review
congress
amended
terminate
administrative
oversight
appeals
stat
contrast
previous
grant
authority
restricted
purely
judicial
review
commission
applies
legislative
standards
validly
set
whether
acts
within
authority
conferred
goes
beyond
whether
proceedings
satisfy
pertinent
demands
due
process
whether
short
compliance
legal
requirements
fix
province
commission
govern
action
appropriate
questions
judicial
decision
federal
radio
nelson
review
may
thus
correct
errors
law
remand
commission
bound
act
upon
correction
federal
power
pacific
administrative
determination
imbedded
legal
question
open
judicial
review
impliedly
foreclose
administrative
agency
error
corrected
enforcing
legislative
policy
committed
charge
cf
ford
motor
labor
board
commission
responsibility
times
measure
applications
standard
convenience
interest
necessity
commission
originally
found
respondent
application
inconsistent
public
interest
erroneous
view
regarding
law
pennsylvania
appeals
laid
bare
error
compelling
obedience
correction
exhausted
power
congress
gave
point
commission
charged
duty
judging
application
light
convenience
interest
necessity
fact
first
disposition
commission
committed
legal
error
create
rights
priority
respondent
later
applicants
otherwise
possessed
congress
confer
priority
done
appeals
write
principle
priority
statute
indirect
result
power
scrutinize
legal
errors
first
allowable
series
administrative
actions
implication
curtailed
review
allowed
communications
act
war
basic
policy
underlying
statute
mean
practical
purposes
contingencies
judicial
review
litigation
rather
public
interest
decisive
factors
determining
several
pending
applications
granted
however
urged
upon
us
matters
administrative
discretion
remain
open
determination
remand
reversal
succession
single
determinations
upon
single
legal
issues
possible
resulting
delay
hardship
applicant
always
easy
conjure
extreme
even
oppressive
possibilities
exertion
authority
courts
charged
general
guardianship
potential
mischief
complicated
tasks
government
present
case
makes
timely
reminder
ultimate
guardians
liberties
welfare
people
quite
great
degree
courts
missouri
kansas
texas
ry
may
congress
creates
sustains
agencies
must
trusted
correct
whatever
defects
experience
may
reveal
interference
courts
conducive
development
habits
responsibility
administrative
agencies
courts
know
small
measure
product
historic
process
judgment
reversed
directions
dissolve
writ
mandamus
dismiss
respondent
petition
reversed
justice
mcreynolds
concurs
result
footnotes
legislative
history
act
see
sess
summary
operation
previous
regulatory
laws
may
found
herring
gross
telecommunications
pp
since
beginning
regulation
act
comparative
considerations
governed
application
standards
convenience
interest
necessity
laid
law
commission
desires
point
interest
convenience
matter
comparative
absolute
standard
applied
broadcasting
stations
since
number
channels
limited
number
persons
desiring
broadcast
far
greater
accommodated
commission
must
determine
among
applicants
licensed
best
serve
public
measure
perhaps
give
less
service
give
least
however
must
sacrificed
give
emphasis
must
first
foremost
interest
convenience
necessity
listening
public
interest
convenience
necessity
individual
broadcaster
advertiser
second
annual
report
federal
radio
commission
pp
see
maitland
constitutional
history
england
pp
landis
administrative
process
passim
see
instance
address
elihu
root
president
american
bar
association
one
special
field
law
development
manifestly
become
inevitable
entering
upon
creation
body
administrative
law
quite
different
machinery
remedies
necessary
safeguards
old
methods
regulation
specific
statutes
enforced
courts
withdrawal
experiments
shall
go
shall
expand
whether
approve
theoretically
agencies
furnish
protection
rights
obstacles
wrong
new
social
industrial
conditions
practically
accomplished
old
simple
procedure
legislatures
courts
last
generation
see
lowden
decided
december
herring
public
administration
public
interest
passim
communications
commission
rules
practice
rule
provided
commission
far
practicable
endeavor
fix
date
hearing
applications
present
conflicting
claims
excepting
however
applications
filed
application
designated
hearing
respondent
contends
seemed
believe
rule
bound
commission
give
respondent
consideration
application
set
hearing
later
rival
applications
filed
commission
interprets
rule
simply
governing
order
applications
shall
heard
touching
upon
order
shall
acted
upon
manner
shall
considered
interpretation
binding
upon
courts
american
tel
tel