ex
parte
hull
argued
decided
march
justice
murphy
delivered
opinion
january
petitioner
convicted
statutory
sex
offense
sentenced
michigan
state
prison
jackson
michigan
indeterminate
term
six
months
ten
years
ten
months
later
paroled
october
convicted
another
sex
offense
returned
prison
serve
sentence
two
half
five
years
entry
second
judgment
apparently
sole
reason
second
conviction
regarded
violation
parole
petitioner
given
hearing
state
parole
board
passed
indefinitely
toward
maximum
sentence
first
offense
see
michigan
statutes
annotated
supplement
november
petitioner
prepared
petition
writ
habeas
corpus
exhibits
file
took
papers
prison
official
requested
notarize
official
refused
informed
petitioner
papers
registered
letter
clerk
concerning
accepted
mailing
although
papers
notarized
petitioner
delivered
father
mailing
outside
prison
guards
confiscated
several
days
later
petitioner
attempted
mail
letter
concerning
case
clerk
intercepted
sent
legal
investigator
state
parole
board
apparently
neither
ters
returned
papers
taken
father
returned
late
december
petitioner
prepared
another
document
somehow
managed
father
file
clerk
december
document
petitioner
detailed
efforts
file
papers
confiscated
prison
officials
contended
therefore
unlawfully
restrained
prayed
released
january
issued
rule
show
cause
leave
file
petition
writ
habeas
corpus
granted
warden
filed
return
rule
setting
forth
circumstances
two
convictions
proceedings
parole
board
numerous
exhibits
justification
action
preventing
petitioner
filing
papers
communicating
warden
alleged
november
published
regulation
providing
legal
documents
briefs
petitions
motions
habeas
corpus
proceedings
appeals
first
submitted
institutional
welfare
office
favorably
acted
upon
referred
perry
maynard
legal
investigator
parole
board
lansing
michigan
documents
submitted
perry
maynard
opinion
properly
drawn
directed
designated
referred
back
inmate
answer
petitioner
filed
return
challenged
validity
regulation
contained
numerous
exhibits
one
exhibits
petition
writ
habeas
corpus
taken
petitioner
father
brief
petition
assailed
legality
petitioner
imprisonment
second
conviction
ground
denied
procedural
due
process
first
question
concerns
effect
regulation
quoted
warden
return
regulation
invalid
considerations
prompted
formulation
without
merit
state
officers
may
abridge
impair
petitioner
right
apply
federal
writ
habeas
corpus
whether
petition
writ
habeas
corpus
addressed
federal
properly
drawn
allegations
must
contain
questions
alone
determine
compare
first
national
bank
anderson
erie
railroad
purdy
carter
texas
see
ex
parte
sharp
however
invalidity
prison
regulation
compel
petitioner
release
reason
necessary
examine
petition
annexed
response
although
exhibit
response
may
considered
motion
leave
file
petition
writ
habeas
corpus
inasmuch
warden
opportunity
answer
next
question
therefore
whether
petition
premature
petition
premature
compare
mcnally
hill
bonner
despite
fact
petitioner
prison
sentence
first
offense
liberty
parole
time
arrested
charged
second
offense
true
parole
regulations
obligated
stay
within
jackson
county
imprisonment
present
mcnally
case
moreover
petitioner
parole
revoked
ordered
serve
first
sentence
second
conviction
see
michigan
statutes
annotated
supra
reason
suppose
compel
parole
board
review
record
second
conviction
make
declaratory
ruling
conviction
void
parole
reinstated
thus
last
question
whether
petition
treated
motion
leave
file
petition
writ
habeas
corpus
sufficient
necessitate
order
requiring
warden
answer
bottom
petitioner
case
second
trial
variance
pleading
proof
respect
date
offense
committed
petitioner
thus
denied
fair
notice
charge
guaranteed
due
process
clause
exhibits
rather
vague
statements
petition
following
appears
opening
statement
throughout
trial
prosecutor
insisted
offense
occurred
date
charged
information
petitioner
defense
elsewhere
time
question
testimony
tended
fix
date
offense
week
earlier
charged
indictment
close
evidence
petitioner
counsel
moved
directed
verdict
ground
evidence
prove
offense
committed
date
charged
information
trial
judge
denied
motion
charged
jury
precise
date
immaterial
sufficient
show
offense
occurred
month
previous
trial
judge
entered
judgment
jury
verdict
guilty
denied
petitioner
motion
new
trial
ground
urged
motion
directed
verdict
michigan
subsequently
denied
certiorari
conclude
showing
made
petition
exhibits
insufficient
compel
order
requiring
warden
answer
petitioner
represented
counsel
throughout
second
trial
yet
claim
petition
objected
evidence
tending
establish
different
date
commission
offense
claimed
surprise
moved
continuance
enable
secure
witnesses
allege
time
trial
alibi
date
make
clear
actual
extent
variance
furthermore
ascertainment
facts
impossible
since
petitioner
furnished
transcript
taken
second
trial
accordingly
improper
inquire
whether
petitioner
denied
procedural
due
process
second
trial
compare
hardy
ledbetter
hodgson
vermont
matthews
motion
leave
file
petition
writ
habeas
corpus
therefore
denied
footnotes
week
later
petitioner
received
following
reply
legal
investigator
letter
november
addressed
clerk
referred
writer
reply
first
place
application
present
form
acceptable
must
file
petition
whatever
relief
seeking
state
reasons
therefor
together
memorandum
brief
petition
must
verified
oath
supported
proper
affidavits
letter
doubt
intercepted
reason
deemed
inadequate
undoubtedly
accounts
fact
found
way
desk
apparently
legal
investigator
serves
attorney
advisor
state
parole
board
functions
respect
legal
documents
prison
inmates
appear
fully
prison
regulation
quoted
hereafter
neither
letters
reached
clerk
december
petitioner
requested
prison
superintendent
mail
trace
registered
letter
since
received
return
receipt
accompanied
assistant
superintendent
replied
mailed
thru
perry
maynard
orders
warden
apparently
legal
investigator
made
reply