smith
phillips
argued
november
decided
january
convicted
murder
jury
trial
new
york
respondent
moved
vacate
conviction
ground
juror
case
submitted
trial
application
employment
investigator
district
attorney
office
prosecuting
attorneys
upon
informed
juror
application
withheld
information
trial
respondent
defense
counsel
trial
hearing
motion
judge
presided
trial
motion
denied
judge
finding
beyond
reasonable
doubt
events
giving
rise
motion
influence
verdict
appellate
division
new
york
affirmed
conviction
new
york
appeals
denied
leave
appeal
subsequently
respondent
sought
habeas
corpus
relief
federal
district
alleging
denied
due
process
law
fourteenth
amendment
conduct
juror
question
finding
insufficient
evidence
demonstrate
juror
actually
biased
district
nevertheless
imputed
bias
accordingly
ordered
respondent
released
unless
state
granted
new
trial
appeals
without
considering
whether
juror
actually
impliedly
biased
affirmed
ground
prosecutors
failure
disclose
knowledge
juror
denied
respondent
due
process
held
respondent
denied
due
process
law
either
juror
conduct
prosecutors
failure
disclose
juror
job
application
pp
due
process
require
new
trial
every
time
juror
placed
potentially
compromising
situation
due
process
means
jury
capable
willing
decide
case
solely
evidence
trial
judge
ever
watchful
prevent
prejudicial
occurrences
determine
effect
occurrences
happen
determinations
may
properly
made
hearing
like
held
case
remmer
moreover
federal
habeas
action
state
trial
judge
findings
presumptively
correct
federal
courts
proceedings
must
disturb
state
courts
findings
unless
federal
habeas
articulates
basis
disarming
findings
statutory
presumption
correct
may
overcome
convincing
evidence
neither
district
appeals
took
issue
state
trial
judge
findings
pp
touchstone
due
process
analysis
cases
alleged
prosecutorial
misconduct
fairness
trial
culpability
prosecutor
prosecutors
failure
disclose
juror
job
application
although
requiring
hearing
juror
bias
deprive
respondent
fair
trial
guaranteed
due
process
clause
fourteenth
amendment
pp
absent
violation
right
guaranteed
respondent
fourteenth
amendment
error
lower
courts
order
new
trial
federal
courts
hold
supervisory
authority
state
judicial
proceedings
may
intervene
correct
wrongs
constitutional
dimension
rehnquist
delivered
opinion
burger
white
blackmun
powell
joined
filed
concurring
opinion
post
marshall
filed
dissenting
opinion
brennan
stevens
joined
post
robert
pitler
argued
cause
petitioner
briefs
mark
dwyer
vivian
berger
william
kunstler
argued
cause
respondent
briefs
vernon
mason
charles
sims
bruce
ennis
richard
zuckerman
filed
brief
american
civil
liberties
union
et
al
amici
curiae
urging
affirmance
justice
rehnquist
delivered
opinion
respondent
convicted
november
new
york
jury
two
counts
murder
one
count
attempted
murder
trial
respondent
moved
vacate
conviction
pursuant
crim
proc
law
mckinney
cpl
hearing
motion
held
pursuant
cpl
hearing
held
justice
presided
respondent
trial
motion
vacate
denied
opinion
concluding
beyond
reasonable
doubt
events
giving
rise
motion
influence
verdict
people
phillips
misc
appellate
division
first
judicial
department
affirmed
conviction
without
opinion
app
div
new
york
appeals
denied
leave
appeal
four
years
denial
leave
appeal
appeals
respondent
sought
federal
habeas
relief
district
southern
district
new
york
ground
asserted
state
hearing
district
granted
writ
supp
appeals
second
circuit
affirmed
somewhat
different
ground
granted
certiorari
consider
important
questions
federal
constitutional
law
relation
federal
habeas
proceedings
raised
decisions
reverse
respondent
original
motion
vacate
conviction
based
fact
juror
respondent
case
one
john
dana
smith
submitted
trial
application
employment
major
felony
investigator
district
attorney
office
smith
learned
position
friend
contacts
within
office
inquired
smith
behalf
without
mentioning
smith
name
fact
juror
respondent
trial
smith
application
received
office
name
placed
list
applicants
contacted
known
office
juror
respondent
trial
later
inquiry
status
smith
application
friend
mentioned
smith
juror
respondent
case
attorney
friend
disclosed
fact
promptly
informed
superior
superior
turn
informed
assistant
district
attorney
charge
hiring
investigators
following
day
one
week
end
respondent
trial
assistant
informed
two
attorneys
actually
prosecuting
respondent
one
jurors
applied
office
employment
investigator
two
prosecuting
attorneys
conferred
application
concluded
view
smith
statements
voir
dire
need
inform
trial
defense
counsel
application
instruct
attorneys
office
contact
smith
trial
ended
took
steps
insure
learn
information
smith
revealed
voir
dire
jury
retired
deliberate
november
three
alternate
jurors
available
substitute
smith
neither
trial
defense
counsel
knew
application
jury
returned
verdict
november
district
attorney
first
learned
smith
application
december
five
days
later
investigation
verify
information
informed
trial
defense
counsel
application
fact
existence
known
attorneys
office
time
conclusion
trial
respondent
attorney
moved
set
aside
verdict
hearing
trial
judge
justice
harold
birns
prosecuting
attorneys
explained
decision
disclose
application
smith
explained
seen
nothing
improper
submitting
application
trial
justice
birns
rom
evidence
adduced
hearing
misc
found
smith
letter
indeed
indiscretion
way
reflected
premature
conclusion
respondent
guilt
prejudice
respondent
inability
consider
guilt
innocence
respondent
solely
evidence
respect
conduct
prosecuting
attorneys
justice
birns
found
evidence
suggesting
sinister
dishonest
motive
respect
smith
letter
application
application
federal
habeas
relief
respondent
contended
denied
due
process
law
fourteenth
amendment
constitution
smith
conduct
district
found
insufficient
evidence
demonstrate
smith
actually
biased
nonetheless
imputed
bias
smith
average
man
smith
position
believe
verdict
jury
directly
affect
evaluation
job
application
accordingly
ordered
respondent
released
unless
state
granted
new
trial
within
days
appeals
second
circuit
affirmed
divided
vote
noted
best
difficult
perhaps
impossible
learn
juror
testimony
verdict
whether
fact
impartial
consider
whether
smith
actually
impliedly
biased
rather
appeals
affirmed
respondent
release
simply
failure
prosecutors
disclose
knowledge
denied
respondent
due
process
ibid
explained
condone
withholding
prosecutor
information
casting
substantial
doubt
impartiality
juror
fact
applied
prosecutor
employment
fair
defendant
ill
serve
maintain
public
confidence
judicial
process
ii
argument
respondent
relied
primarily
reasoning
adopted
district
contends
possibly
ascertain
impartiality
juror
relying
solely
upon
testimony
juror
question
given
human
propensity
respondent
argues
law
must
impute
bias
jurors
smith
position
disagree
long
held
remedy
allegations
juror
partiality
hearing
defendant
opportunity
prove
actual
bias
example
remmer
juror
federal
criminal
trial
approached
someone
offering
money
exchange
favorable
verdict
fbi
agent
assigned
investigate
attempted
bribe
agent
report
reviewed
trial
judge
prosecutor
without
disclosure
defense
counsel
learned
incident
trial
defense
attorneys
moved
verdict
vacated
alleging
moved
mistrial
requested
juror
question
replaced
alternate
juror
incident
disclosed
trial
recognized
seriousness
attempted
bribe
characterized
presumptively
prejudicial
also
undisclosed
investigation
bound
impress
juror
apt
unduly
ibid
despite
recognition
conviction
integrity
jury
proceedings
must
jeopardized
unauthorized
invasions
require
new
trial
like
ordered
case
rather
instructed
trial
judge
determine
circumstances
impact
thereof
upon
juror
whether
prejudicial
hearing
interested
parties
permitted
participate
emphasis
added
words
ordered
precisely
remedy
accorded
justice
birns
case
even
decision
remmer
confronted
allegations
implied
juror
bias
dennis
dennis
convicted
criminal
contempt
failure
appear
committee
activities
house
representatives
argued
jury
convicted
composed
primarily
employees
government
inherently
biased
employees
subject
executive
order
cfr
comp
provided
discharge
upon
reasonable
grounds
belief
disloyal
government
dennis
contended
employees
risk
charge
disloyalty
termination
employment
might
result
vote
acquittal
rejected
claim
implied
bias
noting
dennis
free
show
existence
actual
bias
failed
thus
concluded
holding
implied
bias
disqualify
jurors
relationship
government
longer
permissible
preservation
opportunity
prove
actual
bias
guarantee
defendant
right
impartial
jury
see
also
frazier
wood
decision
last
term
chandler
florida
also
treated
claim
implied
juror
bias
appellants
chandler
convicted
various
theft
crimes
jury
trial
partially
televised
new
canon
judicial
ethics
promulgated
florida
claimed
unusual
publicity
sensational
courtroom
atmosphere
created
televising
proceedings
influence
jurors
preclude
fair
trial
consistent
previous
decisions
held
appropriate
safeguard
prejudice
defendant
right
demonstrate
media
coverage
case
printed
broadcast
compromised
ability
particular
jury
heard
case
adjudicate
fairly
appellants
attempt
show
specificity
presence
cameras
impaired
ability
jurors
decide
case
evidence
refused
set
aside
conviction
cases
demonstrate
due
process
require
new
trial
every
time
juror
placed
potentially
compromising
situation
rule
trials
constitutionally
acceptable
safeguards
juror
impartiality
voir
dire
protective
instructions
trial
judge
infallible
virtually
impossible
shield
jurors
every
contact
influence
might
theoretically
affect
vote
due
process
means
jury
capable
willing
decide
case
solely
evidence
trial
judge
ever
watchful
prevent
prejudicial
occurrences
determine
effect
occurrences
happen
determinations
may
properly
made
hearing
like
ordered
remmer
held
case
district
appeals
disregarded
doctrine
held
hearing
comporting
decisions
remmer
cases
prosecuted
federal
courts
constitutionally
insufficient
state
due
process
clause
fourteenth
amendment
seems
us
follow
night
day
federal
system
hearing
conducted
sufficient
decide
allegations
juror
partiality
due
process
clause
fourteenth
amendment
possibly
require
state
system
equal
importance
case
federal
habeas
action
justice
birns
findings
presumptively
correct
held
last
term
federal
courts
proceedings
must
disturb
findings
state
courts
unless
federal
habeas
articulates
basis
disarming
findings
statutory
presumption
correct
may
overcome
convincing
evidence
sumner
mata
neither
district
appeals
took
issue
findings
justice
birns
iii
already
noted
appeals
rely
upon
district
imputation
bias
indeed
even
reach
question
juror
bias
holding
instead
prosecutors
failure
disclose
smith
application
without
violated
respondent
right
due
process
law
respondent
contends
appeals
thereby
correctly
preserved
appearance
justice
brief
respondent
contention
runs
contrary
decided
cases
past
decisions
demonstrate
touchstone
due
process
analysis
cases
alleged
prosecutorial
misconduct
fairness
trial
culpability
prosecutor
brady
maryland
example
prosecutor
failed
disclose
admission
participant
murder
corroborated
defendant
version
crime
held
prosecutor
suppression
requested
evidence
violates
due
process
evidence
material
either
guilt
punishment
irrespective
good
faith
bad
faith
prosecution
applying
standard
found
undisclosed
admission
relevant
punishment
thus
ordered
defendant
resentenced
since
admission
material
guilt
however
concluded
trial
complied
requirements
due
process
despite
prosecutor
wrongful
suppression
thus
recognized
aim
due
process
punishment
society
misdeeds
prosecutor
avoidance
unfair
trial
accused
ibid
principle
reaffirmed
agurs
held
prosecutor
must
disclose
unrequested
evidence
create
reasonable
doubt
guilt
otherwise
exist
consistent
brady
focused
upon
prosecutor
failure
disclose
upon
effect
nondisclosure
trial
believe
constitutional
obligation
disclose
unrequested
information
measured
moral
culpability
willfulness
prosecutor
evidence
highly
probative
innocence
file
presumed
recognize
significance
even
actually
overlooked
conversely
evidence
actually
probative
significance
purpose
served
requiring
new
trial
simply
inept
prosecutor
incorrectly
believed
suppressing
fact
vital
defense
suppression
evidence
results
constitutional
error
character
evidence
character
prosecutor
citation
omitted
therefore
prosecutors
failure
disclose
smith
job
application
although
requiring
hearing
juror
bias
deprive
respondent
fair
trial
guaranteed
due
process
clause
iv
federally
issued
writ
habeas
corpus
course
reaches
convictions
obtained
violation
provision
constitution
said
cupp
naughten
federal
may
overturn
conviction
resulting
state
trial
must
established
merely
state
action
undesirable
erroneous
even
universally
condemned
violated
right
guaranteed
defendant
fourteenth
amendment
reversed
footnotes
cpl
provides
motions
set
aside
verdict
cpl
must
decided
hearing
allege
disputed
facts
sufficient
grant
motion
hearing
defendant
burden
proving
preponderance
evidence
every
fact
essential
support
motion
cpl
smith
letter
application
addressed
district
attorney
stated
understand
federally
funded
investigative
unit
formed
office
investigate
major
felonies
wish
apply
position
investigator
letter
mention
smith
juror
respondent
trial
appended
letter
resume
containing
biographical
information
smith
people
phillips
misc
trial
judge
described
voir
dire
respondent
case
ten
days
meticulous
examination
voir
dire
smith
stated
intended
pursue
career
law
enforcement
applied
employment
federal
drug
enforcement
agency
also
disclosed
wife
interested
law
enforcement
interest
arose
incident
assaulted
seriously
injured
smith
stated
previously
worked
store
detective
bloomingdale
department
store
capacity
made
several
arrests
led
contact
district
attorney
office
response
close
inquiry
defense
counsel
smith
declared
belief
fair
impartial
juror
case
assurance
apparently
satisfied
defense
counsel
smith
permitted
take
seat
among
jurors
even
though
defense
several
unused
peremptory
challenges
conclusion
based
upon
majority
reading
decision
agurs
reading
concluded
due
process
violated
prosecutor
actions
treat
defendant
unfairly
impugn
integrity
judicial
process
even
defendant
thereby
prejudiced
seen
part
iii
opinion
appeals
misread
agurs
respondent
may
course
defend
judgment
ground
law
record
permit
provided
asserted
ground
expand
relief
granted
new
york
telephone
dandridge
williams
ryerson
respondent
correctly
notes
determinations
made
hearings
frequently
turn
upon
testimony
juror
question
errs
contending
evidence
inherently
suspect
said
dennis
ne
may
know
altogether
understand
imponderables
cause
one
think
thinks
surely
one
trying
honest
man
live
sanctity
oath
well
qualified
say
whether
unbiased
mind
certain
matter
see
also
reid
connection
argument
due
process
denied
prosecutors
withholding
smith
application
respondent
notes
prosecutors
disclosed
application
trial
replaced
smith
alternate
juror
thus
respondent
argues
prosecutors
action
denial
due
process
also
prevented
respondent
availing
process
available
new
york
law
correcting
juror
bias
see
cpl
mckinney
argument
proves
much
hearing
determination
replace
juror
trial
adequately
protected
respondent
right
due
process
law
rendered
impossible
necessary
reliance
juror
testimony
see
reason
hearing
determination
less
protective
possible
said
brady
agurs
confession
affected
outcome
issue
guilt
affected
brady
punishment
material
latter
issue
former
since
material
issue
guilt
entire
trial
lacking
due
process
even
cases
egregious
prosecutorial
misconduct
knowing
use
perjured
testimony
required
new
trial
tainted
evidence
material
case
see
giglio
napue
illinois
materiality
requirement
implicitly
recognizes
misconduct
effect
trial
blameworthiness
prosecutor
crucial
inquiry
due
process
purposes
note
course
nothing
case
suggests
prosecutors
conduct
undertaken
bad
faith
trial
found
evidence
degree
points
conclusion
member
district
attorney
staff
officer
sinister
dishonest
motive
respect
smith
letter
application
sought
gain
thereby
unfair
advantage
defendant
misc
justice
concurring
concur
opinion
write
separately
express
view
opinion
foreclose
use
implied
bias
appropriate
circumstances
determining
whether
juror
biased
prejudged
case
difficult
partly
juror
may
interest
concealing
bias
partly
juror
may
unaware
problem
may
compounded
charge
bias
arises
juror
misconduct
simply
attempts
third
parties
influence
juror
nevertheless
believe
instances
postconviction
hearing
adequate
determine
whether
juror
biased
hearing
permits
counsel
probe
juror
memory
reasons
acting
understanding
consequences
actions
hearing
also
permits
trial
judge
observe
juror
demeanor
evaluate
answers
light
particular
circumstances
case
concerned
however
certain
instances
hearing
may
inadequate
uncovering
juror
biases
leaving
serious
question
whether
trial
subjected
defendant
manifestly
unjust
procedures
resulting
miscarriage
justice
case
must
turn
facts
extreme
situations
justify
finding
implied
bias
examples
might
include
revelation
juror
actual
employee
prosecuting
agency
juror
close
relative
one
participants
trial
criminal
transaction
juror
witness
somehow
involved
criminal
transaction
whether
state
proceedings
result
finding
bias
sixth
amendment
right
impartial
jury
allow
verdict
stand
circumstances
ii
none
previous
cases
preclude
use
conclusive
presumption
implied
bias
appropriate
circumstances
remmer
heavily
relies
involved
juror
misconduct
misconduct
third
party
attempted
bribe
juror
circumstances
juror
accused
misconduct
actual
stake
outcome
trial
thus
significant
incentive
shield
biases
postconviction
hearing
adequately
determine
whether
juror
biased
dennis
rejected
claim
juror
employment
federal
government
ground
find
implied
bias
foreclose
finding
implied
bias
serious
situations
justice
reed
concurred
opinion
wrote
read
decision
mean
government
employees
may
barred
implied
bias
circumstances
properly
brought
attention
convince
government
employees
suitable
jurors
particular
case
moreover
used
implied
bias
reverse
conviction
leonard
per
curiam
held
prospective
jurors
heard
trial
announce
defendant
guilty
verdict
first
trial
automatically
disqualified
sitting
second
trial
similar
charges
iii
may
circumstances
postconviction
hearing
adequate
remedy
charge
juror
bias
important
retain
doctrine
implied
bias
preserve
sixth
amendment
rights
read
opinion
foreclosing
use
implied
bias
appropriate
situations
therefore
concur
exceptional
situations
may
require
application
implied
bias
doctrine
lower
federal
courts
need
deterred
provides
federal
habeas
proceeding
determination
hearing
merits
factual
issue
made
state
competent
jurisdiction
evidenced
written
finding
written
opinion
reliable
adequate
written
indicia
shall
presumed
correct
unless
applicant
shall
establish
shall
otherwise
appear
factfinding
procedure
employed
state
adequate
afford
full
fair
hearing
applicant
receive
full
fair
adequate
hearing
state
proceeding
applicant
otherwise
denied
due
process
law
state
proceeding
extraordinary
situations
involving
implied
bias
proceedings
resulting
finding
bias
definition
inadequate
uncover
bias
law
conclusively
presumes
justice
marshall
justice
brennan
justice
stevens
join
dissenting
juror
john
smith
vigorously
pursued
employment
office
prosecutor
throughout
course
jury
service
respondent
state
criminal
trial
prosecutors
learned
smith
efforts
trial
improperly
failed
disclose
information
jury
returned
verdict
guilty
respondent
state
conducted
evidentiary
hearing
determined
juror
actually
biased
thus
ruled
respondent
prejudiced
refused
set
aside
conviction
respondent
subsequently
filed
petition
writ
habeas
corpus
district
southern
district
new
york
claiming
denied
constitutional
right
impartial
jury
district
ruled
conviction
set
aside
appeals
second
circuit
affirmed
majority
reverses
holding
evidentiary
hearing
provided
sufficient
protection
respondent
right
impartial
jury
find
majority
analysis
completely
unpersuasive
dissent
right
trial
impartial
jury
lies
heart
due
process
irvin
dowd
ur
heritage
constitution
experience
applying
constitution
committed
us
irrevocably
position
criminal
trial
one
purpose
provide
fair
reliable
determination
guilt
estes
texas
warren
douglas
goldberg
joined
concurring
purpose
simply
achieved
jury
deliberations
tainted
bias
prejudice
fairness
reliability
assured
verdict
based
calm
reasoned
evaluation
evidence
presented
trial
thus
time
time
broad
variety
contexts
adopted
strong
measures
protect
right
trial
impartial
jury
insisted
defendants
given
fair
meaningful
opportunity
voir
dire
determine
whether
prospective
jurors
biased
even
specific
prior
knowledge
bias
ham
south
carolina
held
trial
may
deny
negro
defendant
opportunity
question
prospective
jurors
subject
racial
prejudice
circumstances
suggest
need
questioning
even
questions
racial
prejudice
required
generalized
thorough
inquiry
prejudice
necessary
ristaino
ross
also
insisted
jury
selected
representative
community
selection
procedures
exclude
significant
portions
population
thus
increase
risk
bias
invalid
example
peters
kiff
invalidated
selection
procedure
resulted
systematic
exclusion
negroes
similarly
taylor
louisiana
struck
state
rule
excluding
women
compulsory
jury
service
witherspoon
illinois
ruled
defendant
capital
case
denied
right
impartial
jury
issue
sentence
trial
judge
automatically
excluded
jurors
scruples
capital
punishment
right
jury
drawn
fair
community
extends
even
defendants
members
excluded
class
peters
kiff
supra
defendant
challenging
exclusion
blacks
white
taylor
louisiana
supra
defendant
challenging
exclusion
women
male
exclusion
impermissible
simply
jurors
members
defendant
class
may
prejudiced
defendant
also
jury
deprived
perspective
human
events
may
unsuspected
importance
case
may
presented
peters
kiff
supra
opinion
announcing
judgment
see
also
taylor
louisiana
supra
also
acted
protect
defendants
possibility
jurors
might
prejudiced
extensive
pretrial
publicity
rideau
louisiana
ruled
trial
granted
request
change
venue
entire
community
seen
defendant
confess
crime
police
interrogation
broadcast
television
require
particularized
showing
confession
actually
prejudiced
jurors
defendant
later
irvin
dowd
reversed
conviction
widespread
inflammatory
publicity
preceded
trial
even
though
jurors
insisted
remain
impartial
similarly
stated
defendants
must
protected
impact
jurors
publicity
trial
although
absolute
constitutional
ban
news
coverage
trials
print
broadcast
media
justified
defendant
must
given
opportunity
demonstrate
media
coverage
case
compromised
ability
particular
jury
heard
case
weigh
evidence
fairly
chandler
florida
see
also
nebraska
press
assn
stuart
estes
texas
supra
guarded
conduct
third
parties
might
affect
jury
impartiality
remmer
ruled
communication
juror
trial
matter
pending
jury
obvious
reasons
deemed
presumptively
prejudicial
although
presumption
conclusive
burden
rests
heavily
upon
government
establish
notice
hearing
defendant
contact
juror
harmless
defendant
ibid
see
also
turner
louisiana
jury
try
case
placed
protective
custody
deputy
sheriffs
principal
prosecution
witnesses
even
though
jurors
might
influenced
association
summarize
required
inquiry
prejudice
even
evidence
particular
juror
biased
regarded
absence
balanced
perspective
simply
existence
bias
defendant
cognizable
form
prejudice
always
required
particularized
showing
prejudice
strongly
presumed
contact
juror
initiated
third
party
prejudicial
case
evidence
juror
smith
serious
conflict
interest
conflict
inevitably
distort
perspective
case
majority
nevertheless
holds
juror
simple
assertion
verdict
biased
sufficiently
protects
respondent
right
trial
impartial
jury
holding
utterly
inconsistent
historical
recognition
priceless
right
irvin
supra
ii
majority
concedes
importance
right
trial
impartial
jury
claims
however
respondent
right
adequately
protected
state
trial
judge
conducted
postverdict
evidentiary
hearing
concluded
smith
actually
biased
according
majority
constitution
requires
defendant
given
opportunity
prove
actual
bias
indeed
apparently
insist
proof
actual
bias
juror
applied
employment
prosecutor
office
also
juror
already
employed
prosecutor
office
served
prosecuting
attorney
majority
relies
premise
evidentiary
hearing
provides
adequate
assurance
prejudice
exist
premise
however
ignores
basic
human
psychology
cases
like
one
evidentiary
hearing
never
adequately
protect
right
impartial
jury
despite
majority
suggestions
contrary
juror
smith
passive
indifferent
job
applicant
began
pursuing
employment
investigator
office
district
attorney
september
day
sworn
asked
friend
criminal
officer
rudolph
fontaine
determine
proper
method
applying
employment
completed
application
gave
fontaine
hand
delivery
district
attorney
office
apparently
assumed
officer
personal
contact
office
addition
application
filed
met
regularly
fontaine
jury
warden
mario
piazza
order
determine
progress
application
november
jury
returned
verdict
guilt
trial
ended
next
day
smith
phoned
district
attorney
office
check
status
application
unable
get
touch
anyone
knew
application
asked
former
supervisor
make
inquiries
behalf
juror
vigorously
actively
pursues
employment
prosecutor
office
throughout
course
trial
probability
bias
substantial
bias
may
conscious
part
calculated
effort
obtain
job
juror
may
believe
application
viewed
favorably
defendant
found
guilty
thus
may
decide
vote
verdict
guilty
regardless
evidence
may
attempt
persuade
jurors
acquittal
justified
also
serious
danger
unconscious
bias
individuals
extraordinary
character
affected
way
interest
future
employment
subconsciously
juror
may
tend
favor
prosecutor
simply
feels
affinity
potential
employer
indeed
juror
may
make
sincere
effort
remain
impartial
yet
unable
probability
bias
high
also
unlikely
evidentiary
hearing
reveal
bias
appeals
stated
given
human
propensity
difficult
learn
juror
testimony
verdict
whether
fact
impartial
certainly
juror
unlikely
admit
consciously
plotted
defendant
course
trial
admission
subjected
juror
smith
criminal
sanctions
also
damaged
prospects
career
law
enforcement
law
enforcement
agency
unlikely
hire
investigator
whose
credibility
always
impeached
admission
disregarded
juror
oath
criminal
trial
even
bias
part
affirmative
course
misconduct
however
unconscious
juror
unlikely
admit
unable
weigh
evidence
fairly
honestly
believes
remained
impartial
throughout
trial
amount
questioning
lead
admission
rather
juror
vehemently
deny
accusations
bias
past
recognized
question
whether
juror
prejudiced
poses
substantial
problems
proof
bias
prejudice
elusive
condition
mind
difficult
impossible
always
recognize
existence
might
exist
mind
one
account
relations
one
parties
quite
positive
bias
said
perfectly
able
decide
question
wholly
uninfluenced
anything
evidence
crawford
believe
cases
like
one
probability
bias
high
evidence
adduced
hearing
offer
little
assurance
prejudice
exist
juror
deemed
biased
matter
law
specifically
juror
pursues
employment
office
prosecutor
circumstances
highly
suggestive
misconduct
conflict
interest
bias
implied
automatically
disqualified
despite
absence
proof
actual
bias
juror
efforts
secure
employment
revealed
trial
conviction
must
set
aside
right
trial
impartial
jury
important
threat
right
great
justify
rigid
insistence
actual
proof
bias
requirement
blinks
reality
adoption
conclusive
presumption
bias
limited
circumstances
without
precedent
presumptions
juror
bias
ancient
historical
roots
english
common
law
prospective
jurors
challenged
defendant
prove
actual
bias
also
circumstances
bias
implied
blackstone
exclusion
prospective
juror
implied
bias
appropriate
shown
kin
either
party
within
ninth
degree
arbitrator
either
side
interest
cause
action
pending
party
taken
money
verdict
formerly
juror
cause
party
master
servant
counsellor
steward
attorney
society
corporation
blackstone
commentaries
hammond
ed
also
employ
rules
implied
bias
jurisdictions
statutes
set
forth
conduct
status
automatically
disqualify
prospective
jurors
without
regard
whether
person
actually
biased
statutes
frequently
exclude
persons
related
prosecution
defense
counsel
witness
defendant
new
york
statute
applied
juror
smith
intention
apply
job
come
light
voir
dire
especially
broad
disqualifies
person
relationship
party
witness
action
likely
preclude
person
rendering
impartial
verdict
crim
proc
law
mckinney
provision
added
statute
calls
application
average
person
standard
require
proof
particular
potential
juror
biased
see
people
provenzano
state
courts
also
permitted
challenges
implied
bias
basis
fact
least
one
presumed
bias
circumstances
similar
presented
haak
state
ind
indiana
held
woman
whose
husband
offered
position
prosecutor
staff
day
selected
juror
rape
case
impliedly
biased
stated
juror
bias
avoided
dissolved
admonitions
juror
assertion
believed
judge
case
impartially
unrealistic
expect
juror
situation
act
even
hand
toward
parties
ibid
thus
trial
judge
erred
refusing
grant
defendant
motion
mistrial
see
also
tableporter
urist
misc
mun
conviction
set
aside
juror
son
applied
defendant
job
course
fact
many
employ
rules
implied
bias
situations
similar
presented
necessarily
imply
rules
constitutionally
mandated
widespread
state
practice
however
support
conclusion
adopt
rules
expense
strong
interest
efficiently
procuring
convictions
committed
safeguarding
right
trial
impartial
jury
believe
right
seriously
threatened
concluding
rule
appropriate
evidentiary
hearing
adequate
remedy
majority
relies
heavily
decision
remmer
defendant
case
tried
income
tax
evasion
course
trial
unnamed
person
attempted
bribe
juror
juror
reported
incident
trial
judge
asked
federal
bureau
investigation
fbi
conduct
investigation
interviewing
juror
fbi
concluded
bribery
attempt
made
jest
prejudicial
impact
trial
judge
decided
take
action
defense
learned
incident
jury
returned
verdict
guilty
moved
new
trial
complaining
bribery
attempt
fbi
investigation
likely
influenced
jury
deliberations
held
private
communication
juror
trial
matter
pending
jury
presumptively
prejudicial
stated
however
presumption
conclusive
government
given
opportunity
show
contact
harmless
remanded
case
district
directions
hold
hearing
determine
whether
incident
harmful
grant
new
trial
according
majority
remmer
establishes
postverdict
inquiry
always
appropriate
remedy
claims
jury
prejudice
raised
conclusion
trial
holding
remmer
nearly
broad
however
purport
address
instances
serious
juror
misconduct
bias
implied
examination
facts
case
reveals
danger
bias
much
less
substantial
case
one
defendant
claimed
jury
might
influenced
unsuccessful
bribery
attempt
fbi
investigation
allegations
jurors
guilty
misconduct
moreover
even
jurors
influenced
bribery
attempt
made
jest
contact
fbi
evidentiary
hearing
likely
reveal
impact
juror
less
reluctant
admit
disturbed
upset
misconduct
third
party
admit
acted
improperly
majority
also
relies
upon
decisions
dennis
frazier
wood
cases
indicated
fact
juror
employed
federal
government
require
finding
implied
bias
cases
government
party
persuaded
vague
conjectures
government
employees
peculiarly
vulnerable
miasma
fear
intimidated
cringe
government
fear
investigation
loss
employment
duty
jurors
dennis
supra
however
cases
hold
rule
never
appropriate
three
decisions
stressed
trial
judges
retain
power
safeguard
interests
defendant
circumstances
suggest
real
danger
bias
power
surely
includes
application
per
se
rule
necessary
dennis
supra
frazier
supra
wood
supra
indeed
leonard
per
curiam
explicitly
endorsed
application
rule
petitioner
case
convicted
separate
trials
forging
government
checks
transporting
forged
instruments
interstate
commerce
two
cases
tried
succession
jury
first
case
announced
guilty
verdict
open
presence
jury
panel
jurors
try
second
case
selected
petitioner
objected
objection
overruled
reversed
holding
prospective
jurors
sat
courtroom
heard
verdict
returned
individual
immediately
prior
individual
trial
similar
charge
automatically
disqualified
short
cases
establish
automatic
disqualification
rule
never
appropriate
contrary
leonard
reveals
employed
rule
limited
circumstances
presenting
unusually
high
probability
juror
biased
similarly
high
probability
hearing
reveal
bias
majority
also
emphasizes
federal
courts
exercising
habeas
corpus
jurisdiction
must
ordinarily
defer
findings
fact
points
provides
factfinding
presumed
correct
course
federal
courts
limited
power
review
habeas
corpus
proceedings
think
clear
however
deference
appropriate
circumstances
case
already
explained
believe
possible
state
determine
basis
evidentiary
hearing
whether
smith
biased
state
factfinding
inherently
unreliable
section
recognizes
deference
appropriate
cases
provides
presumption
favor
state
factfinding
may
overcome
applicant
receive
full
fair
adequate
hearing
state
proceeding
otherwise
denied
due
process
law
evidentiary
hearing
conducted
fair
adequate
furthermore
hearing
protect
sufficiently
right
impartial
jury
respondent
denied
due
process
circumstances
bar
review
decision
iii
also
affirm
decision
appeals
alternative
ground
respondent
prejudiced
prosecutors
failure
disclose
trial
knowledge
juror
smith
applied
job
office
district
attorney
prosecutors
informed
timely
fashion
alternate
juror
almost
certainly
selected
thus
ending
danger
bias
prosecutors
conduct
withholding
information
clearly
improper
evidentiary
hearing
claimed
failed
disclose
fact
smith
applied
job
office
part
caught
preparations
final
stages
trial
explanation
convincing
close
evidence
prosecutors
revealed
another
juror
bethel
arrested
narcotics
charge
prior
trial
agreed
cooperate
district
attorney
office
exchange
dismissal
charges
disclosure
camera
hearing
parties
consented
discharge
juror
replacement
one
four
alternates
fact
prosecutors
willing
disclose
information
concerning
bethel
suggests
failed
reveal
smith
conduct
time
pressures
believed
smith
presence
jury
valuable
even
petitioner
concedes
prosecutors
informed
trial
judge
defense
soon
learned
smith
application
failure
inexcusable
majority
argues
prosecutorial
misconduct
sufficient
justify
reversal
conviction
habeas
corpus
proceedings
relies
primarily
decisions
agurs
brady
maryland
suggest
constitutional
obligation
disclose
material
evidence
measured
simply
moral
culpability
prosecutor
relief
ordinarily
appropriate
defendant
prejudiced
prosecutor
actions
even
majority
correct
holding
prejudice
also
required
prosecutor
fails
disclose
information
suggesting
juror
might
biased
think
clear
respondent
prejudiced
fact
smith
applied
job
promptly
disclosed
respondent
jury
trial
right
protected
disclosure
made
trial
parties
might
simply
agreed
smith
replaced
one
alternates
agreement
reached
respect
juror
bethel
trial
judge
might
also
exercised
power
crim
proc
law
mckinney
provides
time
trial
jury
sworn
rendition
verdict
satisfied
facts
unknown
time
selection
jury
juror
grossly
unqualified
serve
juror
engaged
misconduct
substantial
nature
may
alternative
juror
available
service
discharge
trial
juror
order
replaced
simple
remedies
eliminated
possibility
juror
bias
least
trial
judge
stated
disclosure
made
trial
conducted
hearing
determine
whether
smith
engaged
misconduct
whether
actually
biased
already
suggested
serious
doubts
whether
evidentiary
hearing
nature
ever
reliable
however
hearing
trial
far
likely
reveal
evidence
bias
hearing
pressures
juror
smith
position
much
less
substantial
trial
admit
unable
obey
oath
juror
unfair
evaluating
evidence
trial
hand
state
pending
application
job
prosecutor
office
might
affect
ability
weigh
evidence
fairly
important
pressures
judge
much
less
substantial
hearing
held
course
trial
trial
judge
finds
juror
biased
simply
replace
juror
alternate
trial
actual
bias
found
remedy
set
aside
conviction
begin
new
trial
judge
hesitate
taking
action
pressures
must
particularly
great
case
respondent
first
tried
jury
unable
reach
verdict
mistrial
declared
respondent
second
trial
begin
two
years
later
second
trial
lasted
nine
weeks
witnesses
called
testify
circumstances
third
trial
led
even
expense
delay
judge
reluctant
set
aside
conviction
short
prosecutors
withheld
information
smith
job
application
quite
likely
smith
excused
replaced
alternate
replacement
made
substantial
danger
juror
bias
eliminated
thus
circumstances
respondent
prejudiced
prosecutors
misconduct
given
existence
prejudice
fundamental
importance
right
impartial
jury
set
aside
conviction
limited
power
federal
courts
habeas
corpus
proceedings
poses
obstacle
conclusion
although
trial
judge
found
hearing
smith
actually
biased
deference
factfinding
required
evidentiary
hearing
factfinding
based
inherently
unreliable
see
supra
prosecutors
misconduct
case
deprived
respondent
hearing
trial
opportunity
substitute
alternate
juror
prosecutors
conduct
acted
deprive
respondent
alternative
state
consistent
due
process
relegate
respondent
right
impartial
jury
belated
inadequate
hearing
iv
majority
adopts
completely
unrealistic
view
efficacy
hearing
thus
fails
accord
meaningful
protection
right
impartial
jury
one
valuable
rights
possessed
criminal
defendants
affirm
judgment
appeals
ground
juror
applies
employment
office
prosecutor
vigorously
pursues
employment
throughout
course
trial
impliedly
biased
also
affirm
alternative
ground
prosecutors
improperly
failed
disclose
trial
juror
applied
job
thereby
prejudicing
respondent
depriving
opportunity
substitute
unbiased
alternate
juror
majority
concedes
due
process
means
unbiased
jury
capable
willing
decide
case
solely
evidence
ante
respondent
asked
opportunity
tried
jury
prosecutors
taken
simple
step
informing
trial
judge
smith
applied
employment
office
smith
replaced
respondent
received
opportunity
tried
impartial
jury
prosecutors
intentionally
failed
however
juror
almost
certainly
prejudiced
respondent
participated
deliberations
due
process
really
mean
full
fair
opportunity
tried
unbiased
jury
capable
willing
decide
case
solely
evidence
case
due
process
denied
irvin
dowd
stated
essence
right
jury
trial
guarantees
criminally
accused
fair
trial
panel
impartial
indifferent
jurors
failure
accord
accused
fair
hearing
violates
even
minimal
standards
due
process
oliver
tumey
ohio
fair
trial
fair
tribunal
basic
requirement
due
process
murchison
ultimate
analysis
jury
strip
man
liberty
life
language
lord
coke
juror
must
indifferent
stands
unsworne
litt
verdict
must
based
upon
evidence
developed
trial
cf
thompson
city
louisville
true
regardless
heinousness
crime
charged
apparent
guilt
offender
station
life
occupies
peters
kiff
opinion
announcing
judgment
stated
procedures
unacceptable
even
proof
actual
bias
marshall
joined
douglas
stewart
opinion
explained
actual
bias
virtually
impossible
prove
ibid
thus
necessary
decide
principle
side
shall
suffer
consequences
unavoidable
uncertainty
ibid
given
great
potential
harm
importance
right
impartial
jury
doubts
resolved
favor
defendant
ibid
see
also
ballard
taylor
louisiana
stated
flavor
distinct
quality
lost
either
sex
excluded
exclusion
one
may
indeed
make
jury
less
representative
community
true
economic
racial
group
excluded
quoting
ballard
supra
majority
notes
voir
dire
defense
chose
challenge
smith
even
though
stated
strong
interest
law
enforcement
career
ante
however
since
defendant
law
enforcement
officer
interest
necessarily
unfavorable
defense
think
clear
general
career
interest
law
enforcement
different
application
job
prosecutor
particular
case
smith
found
engaged
course
conscious
misconduct
might
prosecuted
penal
law
obstructing
governmental
administration
bribe
receiving
juror
misconduct
juror
mckinney
might
also
found
guilty
criminal
contempt
see
petitioner
emphasizes
evidentiary
hearing
trial
judge
opportunity
observe
juror
demeanor
thus
argues
petitioner
even
juror
denies
biased
trial
judge
able
measure
juror
integrity
decide
whether
credit
claim
fairly
weighed
evidence
may
true
opportunity
observe
juror
assistance
cases
however
little
value
juror
honestly
falsely
believes
impartial
although
concurring
opinion
use
rule
case
agrees
circumstances
rule
appropriate
suggests
example
finding
implied
bias
might
justified
juror
actual
employee
prosecuting
agency
ante
view
impossible
draw
meaningful
distinction
juror
actual
employee
prosecuting
agency
juror
applied
employment
agency
indeed
may
greater
danger
bias
juror
pursuing
job
individual
yet
obtained
employment
believes
job
prospects
stake
may
anxious
please
wood
described
common
law
regarding
challenges
prospective
jurors
follows
challenges
common
law
array
respect
constitution
panel
polls
disqualification
juror
challenges
polls
either
principal
favor
former
upon
grounds
absolute
disqualification
latter
actual
bias
see
also
blackstone
commentaries
hammond
ed
see
cal
penal
code
ann
west
supp
idaho
code
rule
crim
proc
crim
proc
law
mckinney
cent
code
supp
okla
tit
rev
stat
comp
laws
ann
utah
code
ann
time
voir
dire
smith
yet
applied
job
office
district
attorney
seems
likely
however
filed
application
point
fact
came
light
voir
dire
automatically
disqualified
pursuant
crim
proc
law
mckinney
see
state
west
reversible
error
trial
denies
challenge
cause
juror
employee
prosecutorial
agency
state
kokoszka
state
howard
overruled
grounds
shulinsky
boston
cf
block
state
ind
juror
deputy
prosecutor
disqualified
barnes
state
ind
juror
whose
relative
member
prosecutor
staff
disqualified
decision
endorse
rules
implied
bias
lead
constitutionalization
wide
variety
state
disqualification
rules
stated
believe
rule
constitutionally
mandated
probability
bias
particularly
great
evidentiary
hearing
particularly
unlikely
reveal
bias
measured
standard
many
state
rules
constitutionally
required
relies
decision
chandler
florida
held
appropriate
safeguard
possibility
news
coverage
defendant
trial
influenced
jurors
defendant
opportunity
show
coverage
compromised
ability
jury
adjudicate
fairly
however
case
certainly
hold
automatic
disqualification
rules
never
appropriate
wood
upheld
constitutionality
district
columbia
statute
permitted
federal
government
employees
serve
juries
party
dennis
ruled
government
employees
need
excused
serving
jurors
prosecution
general
secretary
communist
party
frazier
refused
uphold
challenge
jury
consisted
entirely
government
employees
language
three
opinions
might
interpreted
suggest
hearing
determine
actual
bias
always
sufficient
remedy
see
dennis
reservation
opportunity
prove
actual
bias
guarantee
defendant
right
impartial
jury
frazier
ordinary
circumstances
jurors
subject
challenge
actual
bias
wood
courts
conduct
full
inquiry
actual
bias
circumstances
suggest
inquiry
appropriate
cases
however
regarded
actual
bias
including
prejudice
subjective
sense
also
might
thought
implicitly
arise
view
nature
circumstances
employment
relation
particular
governmental
activity
matters
involved
prosecution
otherwise
frazier
supra
quoting
wood
supra
cf
tumey
ohio
judge
financial
interest
outcome
disqualified
hearing
case
even
though
might
actually
affected
financial
interest
average
man
position
subject
possible
temptation
hold
balance
nice
clear
true
state
accused
murchison
judge
may
conduct
grand
jury
inquiry
adjudicate
charges
defendant
impartiality
might
reasonably
questioned
peters
kiff
opinion
marshall
joined
douglas
stewart
jj
possibility
jury
selection
procedures
exclude
negroes
might
result
bias
defendant
sufficient
justify
invalidation
procedures
see
also
supra
relevant
note
judge
application
pending
litigant
trying
case
presumed
biased
matter
vigorously
protested
actually
impartial
see
tumey
supra
murchison
supra
number
lower
federal
courts
also
suggested
rules
may
appropriate
circumstances
see
mccoy
goldston
bias
implied
new
trial
granted
juror
conceals
information
resulted
disqualification
cause
allsup
new
trial
granted
robbery
trial
two
jurors
worked
bank
robbed
deschenes
dictum
circumstances
prejudice
must
presumed
matter
law
must
grant
new
trial
cavness
dictum
see
also
kyle
app
bazelon
dissenting
defendant
claims
juror
castigated
judge
serving
juror
another
trial
prejudiced
procrustean
demand
showing
prejudice
illsuited
case
integrity
judicial
process
stake
inability
demonstrate
prejudice
offers
little
assurance
prejudice
exist
cert
denied
see
brown
refuses
create
set
unreasonably
constricting
presumptions
jurors
excused
cause
due
certain
occupational
special
relationships
might
bear
directly
indirectly
circumstances
given
case
showing
actual
bias
prejudice
quoting
mikus
almost
years
ago
burr
fed
cas
cc
chief
justice
marshall
indicated
believed
rules
appropriate
circumstances
person
may
declare
feels
prejudice
case
yet
law
cautiously
incapacitates
serving
jury
supposes
prejudice
general
persons
similar
situation
feel
prejudice
ibid
state
trial
judge
district
appeals
condemned
prosecuting
attorneys
conduct
trial
judge
stated
failure
inform
defense
counsel
smith
application
serious
error
judgment
people
phillips
misc
unique
misjudgment
see
also
supp
sdny
majority
also
points
federal
courts
supervisory
power
state
courts
result
habeas
corpus
review
conviction
based
prosecutorial
misconduct
must
focus
possible
due
process
violations
see
donnelly
dechristoforo
depending
nature
prosecutor
misconduct
prejudice
requirement
may
easily
satisfied
prosecutor
knowingly
presents
perjured
testimony
conviction
must
set
aside
reasonable
likelihood
false
testimony
affected
judgment
jury
agurs
presentation
perjured
testimony
corruption
function
trial
process
prosecutor
fails
comply
request
specific
evidence
substantial
basis
claiming
evidence
material
failure
disclose
rarely
excused
brady
maryland
defendant
faces
substantial
burden
prosecutor
fails
disclose
material
evidence
specific
request
evidence
ever
made
circumstance
verdict
may
set
aside
evidence
creates
reasonable
doubt
otherwise
exist
agurs
supra
failure
disclose
possible
juror
bias
analogized
prosecutor
knowing
use
perjured
testimony
forms
prosecutorial
misconduct
result
corruption
function
trial
process
see
agurs
supra
see
also
supra
thus
context
also
conviction
set
aside
reasonable
likelihood
material
omission
affected
judgment
jury
see
supra
clearly
reasonable
likelihood
exist