ornelas
et
al
argued
march
decided
may
denying
petitioners
motion
suppress
cocaine
found
car
district
ruled
police
reasonable
suspicion
stop
question
petitioners
probable
cause
remove
one
interior
panels
package
containing
cocaine
found
appeals
ultimately
affirmed
determinations
reviewing
deferentially
clear
error
finding
clear
error
either
instance
held
ultimate
questions
reasonable
suspicion
stop
probable
cause
make
warrantless
search
reviewed
de
novo
principal
components
either
inquiry
determination
historical
facts
leading
stop
search
decision
mixed
question
law
fact
whether
historical
facts
viewed
standpoint
objectively
reasonable
police
officer
amount
reasonable
suspicion
probable
cause
independent
appellate
review
latter
determination
consistent
position
taken
see
brinegar
prevent
unacceptably
varied
results
based
interpretation
similar
facts
different
trial
judges
see
necessary
appellate
courts
maintain
control
clarify
pertinent
legal
rules
see
miller
fenton
tend
unify
precedent
provide
police
defined
set
rules
instances
make
possible
reach
correct
determination
beforehand
whether
invasion
privacy
justified
interest
law
enforcement
see
new
york
belton
however
reviewing
take
care
review
findings
historical
fact
clear
error
give
due
weight
inferences
drawn
therefrom
resident
judges
view
facts
light
community
distinctive
features
events
local
police
view
facts
lens
experience
expertise
pp
vacated
remanded
rehnquist
delivered
opinion
stevens
kennedy
souter
thomas
ginsburg
breyer
joined
scalia
filed
dissenting
opinion
notice
opinion
subject
formal
revision
publication
preliminary
print
reports
readers
requested
notify
reporter
decisions
typographical
formal
errors
order
corrections
may
made
preliminary
print
goes
press
end
syllabus
saul
ornelas
ismael
petitioners
facts
disputed
early
morning
december
day
detective
michael
pautz
veteran
milwaukee
county
sheriff
department
years
specializing
drug
enforcement
conducting
surveillance
downtown
milwaukee
pautz
noticed
oldsmobile
california
license
plates
motel
parking
lot
car
attracted
pautz
attention
two
reasons
older
model
general
motors
cars
favorite
drug
couriers
easy
hide
things
california
source
state
drugs
detective
pautz
radioed
dispatcher
inquire
car
registration
dispatcher
informed
pautz
owner
either
miguel
ledesma
ornelas
miguel
ornelas
ledesma
san
jose
california
pautz
unsure
name
dispatcher
gave
detective
pautz
checked
motel
registry
learned
ismael
ornelas
accompanied
second
man
registered
without
reservations
pautz
called
partner
donald
hurrle
detective
approximately
years
law
enforcement
experience
assigned
past
years
drug
enforcement
unit
hurrle
arrived
scene
officers
contacted
local
office
drug
enforcement
administration
dea
asked
dea
personnel
run
names
miguel
ledesma
ornelas
ismael
ornelas
narcotics
dangerous
drugs
information
system
naddis
federal
database
known
suspected
drug
traffickers
names
appeared
naddis
naddis
report
identified
miguel
ledesma
ornelas
heroin
dealer
el
centro
california
ismael
ornelas
cocaine
dealer
tucson
arizona
officers
summoned
deputy
luedke
department
dog
merlin
upon
arrival
detective
pautz
left
another
assignment
detective
hurrle
informed
luedke
knew
together
waited
sometime
later
petitioners
emerged
motel
got
oldsmobile
detective
hurrle
approached
car
identified
police
officer
inquired
whether
illegal
drugs
contraband
petitioners
answered
hurrle
asked
identification
given
two
california
driver
licenses
bearing
names
saul
ornelas
ismael
ornelas
hurrle
asked
search
car
petitioners
consented
men
appeared
calm
ismael
shaking
somewhat
deputy
luedke
past
nine
years
searched
approximately
cars
narcotics
searched
oldsmobile
interior
noticed
panel
right
rear
passenger
armrest
felt
somewhat
loose
suspected
panel
might
removed
contraband
hidden
inside
luedke
testify
later
screw
door
jam
adjacent
loose
panel
rusty
meant
screw
removed
time
luedke
dismantled
panel
discovered
two
kilograms
cocaine
petitioners
arrested
petitioners
filed
pretrial
motions
suppress
alleging
police
officers
violated
fourth
amendment
rights
officers
detained
parking
lot
deputy
luedke
searched
inside
panel
without
warrant
government
conceded
officers
approached
petitioners
parking
lot
reasonable
person
felt
free
leave
encounter
investigatory
stop
see
investigatory
stop
permissible
fourth
amendment
supported
reasonable
suspicion
terry
ohio
warrantless
search
car
valid
based
probable
cause
california
acevedo
conducting
evidentiary
hearing
magistrate
judge
concluded
circumstances
gave
officers
reasonable
suspicion
probable
cause
magistrate
found
finding
fact
rust
screw
hence
concluded
deputy
luedke
insufficient
basis
conclude
drugs
found
within
panel
magistrate
nonetheless
recommended
district
deny
suppression
motions
thought
given
presence
dog
officers
found
cocaine
lawful
means
eventually
therefore
drugs
admissible
inevitable
discovery
doctrine
see
nix
williams
district
adopted
magistrate
recommendation
respect
reasonable
suspicion
reasoning
probable
cause
district
thought
model
age
origin
car
fact
two
men
traveling
together
checked
motel
morning
without
reservations
formed
profile
profile
together
naddis
reports
gave
rise
reasonable
suspicion
activity
view
reasonable
suspicion
became
probable
cause
deputy
luedke
found
loose
panel
accordingly
ruled
cocaine
need
excluded
appeals
reviewed
deferentially
district
determinations
reasonable
suspicion
probable
cause
reverse
upon
finding
clear
error
found
clear
error
analysis
affirmed
determination
ibid
respect
finding
however
remanded
case
determination
whether
luedke
credible
testifying
loose
panel
remand
magistrate
judge
expressly
found
testimony
credible
district
accepted
finding
ruled
probable
cause
supported
search
seventh
circuit
held
determination
clearly
erroneous
judgt
order
reported
granted
certiorari
resolve
conflict
among
circuits
applicable
standard
appellate
review
articulating
precisely
reasonable
suspicion
probable
cause
mean
possible
commonsense
nontechnical
conceptions
deal
factual
practical
considerations
everyday
life
reasonable
prudent
men
legal
technicians
act
illinois
gates
quoting
brinegar
see
sokolow
standards
readily
even
usefully
reduced
neat
set
legal
rules
gates
supra
described
reasonable
suspicion
simply
particularized
objective
basis
suspecting
person
stopped
criminal
activity
cortez
probable
cause
search
existing
known
facts
circumstances
sufficient
warrant
man
reasonable
prudence
belief
contraband
evidence
crime
found
see
brinegar
supra
gates
supra
cautioned
two
legal
principles
standards
comparable
standards
proof
beyond
reasonable
doubt
proof
preponderance
evidence
gates
supra
instead
fluid
concepts
take
substantive
content
particular
contexts
standards
assessed
gates
supra
brinegar
supra
standard
proof
probable
cause
correlative
must
proved
ker
california
cour
recognition
standards
reasonableness
fourth
amendment
susceptible
procrustean
application
ach
case
decided
facts
circumstances
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
terry
ohio
supra
limitations
imposed
fourth
amendment
developed
concrete
factual
circumstances
individual
cases
principal
components
determination
reasonable
suspicion
probable
cause
events
occurred
leading
stop
search
decision
whether
historical
facts
viewed
standpoint
objectively
reasonable
police
officer
amount
reasonable
suspicion
probable
cause
first
part
analysis
involves
determination
historical
facts
second
mixed
question
law
fact
historical
facts
admitted
established
rule
law
undisputed
issue
whether
facts
satisfy
relevant
statutory
constitutional
standard
put
another
way
whether
rule
law
applied
established
facts
violated
swint
think
independent
appellate
review
ultimate
determinations
reasonable
suspicion
probable
cause
consistent
position
taken
past
cases
never
reviewing
determination
expressly
deferred
trial
determination
see
brinegar
supra
rejecting
district
conclusion
police
lacked
probable
cause
alabama
white
conducting
independent
review
finding
reasonable
suspicion
policy
sweeping
deference
permit
absence
significant
difference
facts
fourth
amendment
incidence
tur
whether
different
trial
judges
draw
general
conclusions
facts
sufficient
insufficient
constitute
probable
cause
brinegar
supra
varied
results
inconsistent
idea
unitary
system
law
unacceptable
addition
legal
rules
probable
cause
reasonable
suspicion
acquire
content
application
independent
review
therefore
necessary
appellate
courts
maintain
control
clarify
legal
principles
see
miller
fenton
relevant
legal
principle
given
meaning
application
particular
circumstances
case
reluctant
give
trier
fact
conclusions
presumptive
force
strip
federal
appellate
primary
function
expositor
law
finally
de
novo
review
tends
unify
precedent
come
closer
providing
law
enforcement
officers
defined
set
rules
instances
makes
possible
reach
correct
determination
beforehand
whether
invasion
privacy
justified
interest
law
enforcement
new
york
belton
see
also
thompson
keohane
slip
law
declaration
aspect
independent
review
potentially
may
guide
police
unify
precedent
stabilize
law
effects
serve
legitimate
law
enforcement
interests
true
mosaic
analyzed
inquiry
one
determination
seldom
useful
precedent
another
gates
supra
exceptions
instance
circumstances
brinegar
supra
carroll
alike
concluded
reversing
circuit
decision
brinegar
necessary
faithful
carroll
brinegar
supra
find
present
facts
substantial
basis
distinguishing
case
carroll
case
likewise
recognized
similarity
facts
sokolow
florida
royer
cases
defendant
traveled
assumed
name
paid
airline
ticket
cash
number
small
bills
traveled
miami
source
city
illicit
drugs
appeared
nervous
airport
true
ross
california
acevedo
see
facts
case
closely
resemble
facts
ross
mendenhall
reid
georgia
see
powell
concurring
facts
mendenhall
remarkably
similar
present
case
even
one
case
may
squarely
control
another
one
two
decisions
viewed
together
may
usefully
add
body
law
subject
appeals
adopting
deferential
standard
review
reasoned
de
novo
review
warrantless
searches
inconsistent
great
deference
paid
reviewing
decision
issue
warrant
see
illinois
gates
see
spears
agree
fourth
amendment
demonstrates
strong
preference
searches
conducted
pursuant
warrant
gates
supra
police
likely
use
warrant
process
scrutiny
applied
magistrate
determination
issue
warrant
less
warrantless
searches
eliminate
distinction
eliminate
incentive
therefore
hold
general
matter
determinations
reasonable
suspicion
probable
cause
reviewed
de
novo
appeal
said
hasten
point
reviewing
take
care
review
findings
historical
fact
clear
error
give
due
weight
inferences
drawn
facts
resident
judges
local
law
enforcement
officers
trial
judge
views
facts
particular
case
light
distinctive
features
events
community
likewise
police
officer
views
facts
lens
police
experience
expertise
background
facts
provide
context
historical
facts
seen
together
yield
inferences
deserve
deference
example
may
amount
reasonable
suspicion
motel
located
alongside
transcontinental
highway
height
summer
tourist
season
may
rise
level
december
milwaukee
city
unlikely
overnight
stop
selected
last
minute
traveler
coming
california
points
east
width
lake
michigan
blocks
eastward
progress
city
salubrious
summer
climate
seasonal
attractions
bring
many
tourists
time
year
true
december
milwaukee
average
daily
high
temperature
month
degrees
average
daily
low
degrees
percentage
possible
sunshine
percent
reasonable
inference
californian
stopping
milwaukee
december
either
transact
business
visit
family
friends
background
facts
though
rarely
subject
explicit
findings
inform
judge
assessment
historical
facts
similar
vein
cases
recognized
police
officer
may
draw
inferences
based
experience
deciding
whether
probable
cause
exists
see
ortiz
layman
sort
loose
panel
back
seat
arm
rest
automobile
involved
case
may
suggest
wear
tear
officer
luedke
searched
roughly
cars
narcotics
suggested
drugs
may
secreted
inside
panel
appeals
give
due
weight
trial
finding
officer
credible
inference
reasonable
vacate
judgments
remand
case
appeals
review
de
novo
district
determinations
officer
reasonable
suspicion
probable
cause
case
ordered
justice
scalia
dissenting
today
decides
district
determinations
whether
probable
cause
justify
warrantless
search
reasonable
suspicion
make
investigatory
stop
reviewed
de
novo
past
reviewed
mixed
questions
law
fact
de
novo
basis
others
deferential
basis
depending
upon
essentially
practical
considerations
respect
questions
issue
purpose
determination
extremely
nature
cause
de
novo
review
relatively
little
benefit
view
unwise
require
courts
appeals
undertake
searching
inquiry
standard
requires
affirm
judgment
appeals
recognizes
determinations
probable
cause
reasonable
suspicion
involve
process
first
must
identify
relevant
historical
facts
known
officer
time
stop
search
second
must
decide
whether
standard
objective
reasonableness
facts
give
rise
reasonable
suspicion
justifying
stop
probable
cause
search
see
ante
second
step
requires
application
objective
legal
standard
facts
properly
characterized
mixed
question
law
fact
see
ante
swint
merely
labeling
issues
mixed
questions
however
establish
receive
de
novo
review
well
settled
appellate
courts
accep
findings
fact
clearly
erroneous
decid
questions
law
de
novo
first
options
chicago
kaplan
slip
rigid
rule
respect
mixed
questions
said
deferential
review
mixed
questions
law
fact
warranted
appears
district
better
positioned
appellate
decide
issue
question
probing
appellate
scrutiny
contribute
clarity
legal
doctrine
salve
regina
college
russell
citing
miller
fenton
primary
factors
counsel
favor
deferential
review
mixed
questions
law
district
lack
value
appellate
ordinarily
present
respect
determinations
reasonable
suspicion
probable
cause
factual
details
bearing
upon
determinations
often
numerous
even
supported
uncontroverted
police
testimony
subject
credibility
determinations
appellate
never
benefit
district
intimate
familiarity
details
full
benefit
hearing
live
testimony
unless
district
makes
specific
findings
totality
circumstances
bearing
upon
stop
search
recognized
cooter
gell
hartmarx
case
holding
deferential
review
applied
district
federal
rule
civil
procedure
determination
attorney
conduct
reasonable
inquiry
entertain
substantiated
belief
regarding
nonfrivolousness
complaint
see
district
amiliar
issues
litigants
better
situated
appeals
marshal
pertinent
facts
apply
legal
standard
moreover
acknowledges
reasonable
suspicion
probable
cause
commonsense
nontechnical
conceptions
deal
factual
practical
considerations
everyday
life
reasonable
prudent
men
legal
technicians
act
ante
quoting
illinois
gates
quoting
brinegar
trial
makes
commonsense
determinations
based
totality
circumstances
ordinarily
accorded
deference
said
case
concerning
question
whether
certain
payments
gift
excludable
income
internal
revenue
code
equally
pertinent
decision
issue
presented
cases
must
based
ultimately
application
tribunal
experience
mainsprings
human
conduct
totality
facts
case
nontechnical
nature
standard
close
relationship
data
practical
human
experience
multiplicity
relevant
factual
elements
various
combinations
creating
necessity
ascribing
proper
force
confirm
us
conclusion
primary
weight
area
must
given
conclusions
trier
fact
commissioner
duberstein
facts
case
illustrate
futility
attempting
craft
useful
precedent
review
demanded
determinations
probable
cause
reasonable
suspicion
remand
conducting
de
novo
review
seventh
circuit
might
consider
inter
alia
following
factors
relevant
determination
whether
probable
cause
conduct
warrantless
search
reasonable
suspicion
justifying
investigatory
stop
two
naddis
tips
ii
car
general
motors
product
iii
car
california
source
state
iv
car
milwaukee
december
vi
one
suspect
checked
hotel
vii
reservations
viii
one
traveling
companion
ix
one
suspect
appeared
calm
shaking
loose
panel
car
door
seventh
circuit
find
unique
confluence
factors
supported
probable
cause
reasonable
suspicion
absence
one
factors
next
case
render
precedent
inapplicable
course
even
factors
replicated
use
de
novo
standard
opposed
deferential
standard
provide
greater
clarity
latter
suffice
set
trial
conclusion
aside
appellate
holds
basis
deferential
review
reversible
error
district
find
probable
cause
reasonable
suspicion
light
certain
facts
advances
clarity
law
much
reversed
district
conducting
plenary
review
present
case
additional
factor
counseling
de
novo
review
must
mentioned
prime
benefit
de
novo
appellate
review
criminal
cases
course
prevent
miscarriage
justice
might
result
permitting
verdict
guilty
rest
upon
legal
determinations
single
judge
issue
cases
innocence
deterrence
unlawful
police
conduct
deterrence
lessened
trial
judge
determination
right
wrong
subjected
deferential
review
wrong
assertion
ante
unless
dual
standard
review
magistrate
decision
issue
warrant
de
novo
review
district
ex
post
facto
approval
warrantless
incentive
obtain
warrant
eliminated
leon
held
reliable
physical
evidence
seized
officers
reasonably
relying
warrant
issued
detached
neutral
magistrate
admissible
prosecutor
case
chief
warrant
provide
assurance
fruits
even
technically
improper
search
admissible
law
enforcement
officers
still
ample
incentive
proceed
warrant
finally
must
observe
appear
courage
conclusions
apparent
effort
reduce
unproductive
burden
today
decision
imposes
upon
appellate
courts
perhaps
salvage
trial
superior
familiarity
facts
cast
aside
suggests
appellate
give
due
weight
trial
finding
officer
inference
wrongdoing
assessment
probable
cause
search
reasonable
ante
ways
finding
reasonableness
precisely
told
us
appellate
must
review
de
novo
de
novo
review
weight
due
trial
finding
zero
last
analysis
opinion
seems
wrong
contradictory
affirm
judgment
seventh
circuit
ground
correctly
applied
deferential
standard
review
district
findings
probable
cause
reasonable
suspicion
footnotes
petitioners
also
alleged
given
consent
search
interior
car
magistrate
judge
rejected
claim
finding
record
clearly
establishe
consent
search
oldsmobile
neither
petitioner
placed
restrictions
areas
officers
search
app
magistrate
ruled
consent
give
officers
authority
search
inside
panel
however
seventh
circuit
precedent
police
may
dismantle
car
body
otherwise
valid
search
unless
police
probable
cause
believe
car
panels
contain
narcotics
see
garcia
assume
correct
circuit
limitation
scope
consent
purposes
decision
district
emphasized
twice
reject
magistrate
recommendation
respect
inevitable
discovery
doctrine
app
appeal
government
defend
seizure
alternative
ground
seventh
circuit
considered
argument
waived
seventh
circuit
uses
term
clear
error
denote
deferential
standard
applied
reviewing
determinations
reasonable
suspicion
probable
cause
think
preferable
term
abuse
discretion
see
pierce
underwood
clear
error
term
art
derived
rule
federal
rules
civil
procedure
applies
reviewing
questions
fact
compare
puerta
de
novo
review
ramos
de
novo
review
cert
denied
patrick
de
novo
review
spears
clear
error
accord
petitioners
contends
de
novo
standard
review
apply
determinations
probable
cause
reasonable
suspicion
therefore
invited
peter
isakoff
brief
argue
case
amicus
curiae
support
judgment
isakoff
accepted
appointment
well
fulfilled
assigned
responsibility