ham
south
carolina
argued
november
decided
january
petitioner
civil
rights
worker
claims
trial
resulting
drug
conviction
affirmed
south
carolina
fair
trial
refusal
examine
jurors
voir
dire
possible
prejudice
arising
fact
petitioner
negro
wears
beard
held
trial
refusal
make
inquiry
jurors
racial
bias
petitioner
timely
request
therefore
denied
petitioner
fair
trial
violation
due
process
clause
fourteenth
amendment
refusal
inquire
particular
bias
beards
make
inquiries
bias
general
constitutional
error
pp
reversed
rehnquist
delivered
opinion
burger
brennan
stewart
white
blackmun
powell
joined
douglas
post
marshall
post
filed
opinions
concurring
part
dissenting
part
jonathan
shapiro
argued
cause
petitioner
brief
jack
greenberg
james
nabrit
iii
anthony
amsterdam
timothy
quinn
assistant
attorney
general
south
carolina
argued
cause
respondent
brief
daniel
mcleod
attorney
general
justice
rehnquist
delivered
opinion
petitioner
convicted
south
carolina
trial
possession
marihuana
violation
state
law
sentenced
months
confinement
appeal
conviction
affirmed
divided
south
carolina
granted
certiorari
limited
question
whether
trial
judge
refusal
examine
jurors
voir
dire
possible
prejudice
petitioner
violated
latter
federal
constitutional
rights
petitioner
young
bearded
negro
lived
life
florence
county
south
carolina
appears
well
known
locally
work
civil
rights
activities
southern
christian
leadership
conference
committee
city
florence
never
previously
convicted
crime
basic
defense
trial
law
enforcement
officers
get
civil
rights
activities
framed
drug
charge
prior
trial
judge
voir
dire
examination
prospective
jurors
petitioner
counsel
requested
judge
ask
jurors
four
questions
relating
possible
prejudice
petitioner
first
two
questions
sought
elicit
possible
racial
prejudice
negroes
third
question
related
possible
prejudice
beards
fourth
dealt
pretrial
publicity
relating
drug
problem
trial
judge
putting
prospective
jurors
three
general
questions
bias
prejudice
partiality
specified
south
carolina
statutes
declined
ask
four
questions
posed
petitioner
dissenting
justices
south
carolina
thought
decision
aldridge
binding
state
negro
tried
murder
white
policeman
requested
prospective
jurors
asked
whether
entertained
racial
prejudice
reversed
judgment
conviction
trial
judge
refusal
make
inquiry
chief
justice
hughes
writing
stated
essential
demands
fairness
required
trial
judge
circumstances
case
interrogate
veniremen
respect
racial
prejudice
upon
request
counsel
negro
criminal
defendant
opinion
relied
upon
number
state
holdings
throughout
country
effect
expressly
grounded
upon
constitutional
requirement
since
one
purposes
due
process
clause
fourteenth
amendment
insure
essential
demands
fairness
lisenba
california
since
principal
purpose
adoption
fourteenth
amendment
prohibit
invidiously
discriminating
basis
race
cases
wall
think
fourteenth
amendment
required
judge
case
interrogate
jurors
upon
subject
racial
prejudice
south
carolina
law
permits
challenges
cause
authorizes
trial
judge
conduct
voir
dire
examination
potential
jurors
state
created
statutory
framework
selection
juries
essential
fairness
required
due
process
clause
fourteenth
amendment
requires
facts
shown
record
petitioner
permitted
jurors
interrogated
issue
racial
bias
cf
groppi
wisconsin
bell
burson
agree
dissenting
justices
south
carolina
trial
judge
required
put
question
particular
form
ask
particular
number
questions
subject
simply
requested
petitioner
aldridge
pains
point
context
authority
within
federal
system
courts
allows
good
deal
closer
supervision
fourteenth
amendment
trial
broad
discretion
questions
asked
discretion
form
number
questions
permitted
due
process
clause
fourteenth
amendment
least
broad
context
either
brief
general
questions
urged
petitioner
appear
sufficient
focus
attention
prospective
jurors
racial
prejudice
might
entertain
third
petitioner
proposed
questions
addressed
fact
wore
beard
say
prejudice
people
beards
might
harbored
one
potential
jurors
case
beginning
end
inquiry
whether
fourteenth
amendment
required
trial
judge
interrogate
prospective
jurors
possible
prejudice
given
traditionally
broad
discretion
accorded
trial
judge
conducting
voir
dire
aldridge
supra
inability
constitutionally
distinguish
possible
prejudice
beards
host
possible
similar
prejudices
believe
petitioner
constitutional
rights
violated
trial
judge
refused
put
question
inquiry
racial
prejudice
derives
constitutional
stature
firmly
established
precedent
aldridge
numerous
state
cases
upon
relied
principal
purpose
well
language
adopted
fourteenth
amendment
trial
judge
refusal
inquire
particular
bias
beards
inquiries
bias
general
reach
level
constitutional
violation
petitioner
final
question
related
allegedly
prejudicial
pretrial
publicity
record
us
contains
neither
newspaper
articles
description
television
program
question
lack
material
record
substantiating
pretrial
publicity
prejudicial
petitioner
occasion
determine
merits
request
question
posed
voir
dire
trial
refusal
make
inquiry
racial
bias
prospective
jurors
petitioner
timely
request
therefor
judgment
south
carolina
reversed
footnotes
four
questions
sought
asked
following
fairly
try
case
basis
evidence
disregarding
defendant
race
prejudice
negroes
black
people
influenced
use
term
black
disregard
fact
defendant
wears
beard
deciding
case
watch
television
show
local
drug
problem
days
ago
local
policeman
appeared
long
time
heard
show
read
heard
recent
newspaper
articles
effect
local
drug
problem
bad
try
case
solely
basis
evidence
presented
courtroom
influenced
circumstances
prosecution
witness
police
officer
publicly
spoken
tv
drugs
code
three
questions
asked
prospective
jurors
case
substance
following
formed
expressed
opinion
guilt
innocence
defendant
gene
ham
conscious
bias
prejudice
give
state
defendant
fair
impartial
trial
record
indicates
brief
colloquy
petitioner
counsel
trial
judge
former
apparently
offered
newspaper
accounts
editorial
support
request
question
propounded
judge
responded
consider
items
submitted
prejudicial
south
carolina
discussing
prejudicial
publicity
context
petitioner
claim
entitled
change
venue
stated
two
newspaper
clippings
one
editorial
concerning
drug
abuse
name
defendant
refer
way
trial
justice
douglas
concurring
part
dissenting
part
concur
portion
majority
opinion
holds
trial
judge
constitutionally
compelled
inquire
possibility
racial
prejudice
voir
dire
think
however
abuse
discretion
trial
judge
preclude
defendant
inquiry
prospective
jurors
prejudice
hair
growth
explored
unquestioned
defendant
constitutional
right
trial
neutral
impartial
jury
criminal
convictions
reversed
limitations
voir
dire
unreasonably
infringed
exercise
right
aldridge
reversals
limited
incidents
defendant
precluded
inquiring
possible
racial
prejudice
morford
dennis
defendants
held
right
inquire
possible
prejudices
concerning
defendants
alleged
ties
communist
party
aldridge
supra
made
clear
voir
dire
aimed
disclosing
prejudices
serious
character
must
allowed
prejudices
involving
hair
growth
unquestionably
serious
character
nothing
indicative
importance
currently
attached
hair
growth
general
populace
barrage
cases
reaching
courts
evidencing
attempt
one
segment
society
officially
control
plumage
another
issue
student
right
wear
long
hair
alone
well
reported
cases
olff
east
side
union
high
school
addition
issue
plumage
surfaced
context
roberts
general
mills
supp
nd
ohio
conard
goolsby
supp
nd
miss
well
military
area
friedman
froehlke
prejudices
invoked
mere
sight
hair
growth
deeply
felt
hair
growth
symbolic
many
rebellion
traditional
society
disapproval
way
current
power
structure
handles
social
problems
taken
affirmative
declaration
individual
commitment
change
social
values
nonconventional
hair
growth
may
become
real
personal
threat
support
status
quo
people
nonconventional
hair
growth
symbolizes
undesirable
lifestyle
characterized
unreliability
dishonesty
lack
moral
values
communal
communist
tendencies
assumption
drug
use
defendant
especially
one
prosecuted
illegal
use
drugs
allowed
even
make
minimal
inquiry
expose
prejudices
expected
receive
fair
trial
since
hair
growth
outward
manifestation
many
people
determine
whether
apply
prejudices
individual
deny
defendant
right
examine
aspect
prospective
juror
personality
deny
effective
means
voir
dire
examination
justice
marshall
concurring
part
dissenting
part
concur
portion
majority
opinion
holds
trial
judge
constitutionally
compelled
inquire
possibility
racial
prejudice
voir
dire
also
agree
record
say
judge
required
ask
questions
pretrial
publicity
agree
however
judge
acted
properly
totally
foreclosing
reasonable
relevant
avenues
inquiry
possible
prejudice
long
sixth
amendment
made
applicable
due
process
clause
fourteenth
amendment
see
duncan
louisiana
held
right
impartial
jury
basic
system
justice
essence
right
jury
trial
guarantees
criminally
accused
fair
trial
panel
impartial
indifferent
jurors
failure
accord
accused
fair
hearing
violates
even
minimal
standards
due
process
language
lord
coke
juror
must
indifferent
stands
unsworne
litt
verdict
must
based
upon
evidence
developed
trial
cf
thompson
city
louisville
true
regardless
heinousness
crime
charged
apparent
guilt
offender
station
life
occupies
written
law
early
chief
justice
marshall
burr
trial
theory
law
juror
formed
opinion
impartial
reynolds
irvin
dowd
omitted
never
suggested
right
impartiality
fairness
protects
certain
classes
prejudice
extends
certain
groups
population
makes
little
difference
criminal
defendant
whether
jury
prejudged
color
skin
length
hair
either
event
deprived
right
present
case
neutral
detached
observers
capable
rendering
fair
impartial
verdict
unsurprising
invalidated
decisions
reached
juries
wide
variety
different
prejudices
see
witherspoon
illinois
irvin
dowd
supra
morford
moreover
also
held
right
impartial
jury
carries
concomitant
right
take
reasonable
steps
designed
insure
jury
impartial
variety
techniques
available
serve
end
see
groppi
wisconsin
sheppard
maxwell
perhaps
important
jury
challenge
see
johnson
louisiana
opinion
powell
swain
alabama
indeed
first
justice
harlan
speaking
unanimous
thought
right
challenge
one
important
rights
secured
accused
ny
system
empanelling
jury
prevents
embarrasses
full
unrestricted
exercise
accused
right
must
condemned
pointer
see
also
lewis
course
right
challenge
little
meaning
unaccompanied
right
ask
relevant
questions
voir
dire
upon
challenge
cause
predicated
see
swain
alabama
supra
reason
held
reservation
opportunity
prove
actual
bias
guarantee
defendant
right
impartial
jury
dennis
reversed
criminal
convictions
right
query
voir
dire
unreasonably
infringed
see
aldridge
contrary
majority
suggestion
reversals
confined
cases
defendant
prevented
asking
racial
prejudice
see
morford
supra
cf
dennis
supra
mean
suggest
defendant
must
permitted
propound
question
limitless
time
must
devoted
preliminary
voir
dire
although
defendant
interest
jury
free
prejudice
strong
countervailing
state
interests
expeditious
conduct
criminal
trials
avoidance
jury
intimidation
interests
bulk
larger
possibility
uncovering
prejudice
becomes
attenuated
trial
judge
broad
discretion
refuse
ask
questions
irrelevant
vexatious
thus
claimed
prejudice
novel
character
judge
might
require
preliminary
showing
relevance
possible
prejudice
allowing
questions
broad
judge
discretion
matters
think
clear
abused
case
defense
attorney
wished
ask
four
questions
required
scant
additional
minutes
time
inquiries
directed
inter
alia
possible
prejudice
people
beards
obviously
relevant
since
defendant
fact
bearded
moreover
judge
afforded
petitioner
opportunity
show
significant
number
potential
jurors
might
prejudiced
people
beards
minimum
think
opportunity
provided
believe
circumstances
absolute
ban
questions
designed
uncover
prejudice
represents
proper
balance
competing
demands
fairness
expedition
may
permitting
slightly
extensive
voir
dire
examination
put
additional
burden
administration
justice
chief
justice
hughes
argued
years
ago
far
injurious
permit
thought
persons
entertaining
disqualifying
prejudice
allowed
serve
jurors
inquiries
designed
elicit
fact
disqualification
barred
surer
way
devised
bring
processes
justice
disrepute
aldridge
therefore
hold
defendant
case
subject
limitations
set
constitutionally
protected
interest
judge
propound
additional
question
form
jury
indeed
confined
aldridge
upon
majority
heavily
relies
aldridge
pointed
right
examine
jurors
voir
dire
existence
disqualifying
state
mind
upheld
respect
races
black
race
relation
religious
prejudices
serious
character
also
agree
majority
judge
may
properly
decline
ask
question
particular
form
ask
particular
number
questions
subject