wade
argued
february
decided
june
several
weeks
respondent
indictment
robbery
federally
insured
bank
conspiracy
respondent
without
notice
appointed
counsel
placed
lineup
person
wore
strips
tape
face
robber
allegedly
done
direction
repeated
words
like
robber
allegedly
used
two
bank
employees
identified
respondent
robber
trial
asked
robber
courtroom
identified
respondent
prior
lineup
identifications
elicited
urging
conduct
lineup
violated
fifth
amendment
privilege
sixth
amendment
right
counsel
respondent
filed
motion
judgment
acquittal
alternatively
strike
courtroom
identifications
trial
denied
motions
respondent
convicted
appeals
reversed
holding
though
fifth
amendment
deprivation
absence
counsel
lineup
denied
respondent
right
counsel
sixth
amendment
required
grant
new
trial
identifications
made
lineup
identifications
excluded
held
neither
lineup
anything
required
therein
violated
respondent
fifth
amendment
privilege
since
merely
exhibiting
person
observation
witnesses
using
voice
identifying
physical
characteristic
involved
compulsion
accused
give
evidence
testimonial
nature
prohibited
amendment
pp
sixth
amendment
guarantees
accused
right
counsel
trial
critical
confrontation
prosecution
pretrial
proceedings
results
might
well
determine
fate
absence
counsel
might
derogate
right
fair
trial
pp
lineup
unlike
preparatory
steps
analyzing
fingerprints
blood
samples
critical
prosecutive
stage
respondent
entitled
aid
counsel
pp
great
possibility
unfairness
accused
point
manner
confrontations
identification
frequently
conducted
dangers
inherent
eyewitness
identification
suggestibility
inherent
context
confrontations
likelihood
accused
often
precluded
reconstructing
occurred
thereby
obtaining
full
hearing
identification
issue
trial
pp
case
illustrates
potential
improper
influence
witnesses
lineup
procedure
since
bank
employees
allowed
see
respondent
custody
fbi
agents
lineup
began
pp
presence
counsel
lineup
significantly
promote
fairness
confrontation
full
hearing
trial
issue
identification
pp
identification
witness
accused
exhibited
trial
absence
counsel
must
excluded
unless
established
evidence
independent
origin
error
admission
harmless
since
clear
appeals
applied
prescribed
rule
exclusion
since
nature
identifications
issue
trial
determined
record
case
must
remanded
district
resolution
issues
pp
beatrice
rosenberg
argued
cause
brief
acting
solicitor
general
spritzer
assistant
attorney
general
vinson
nathan
lewin
ronald
gainer
weldon
holcomb
argued
cause
filed
brief
respondent
justice
brennan
delivered
opinion
question
whether
courtroom
identifications
accused
trial
excluded
evidence
accused
exhibited
witnesses
trial
lineup
conducted
identification
purposes
without
notice
absence
accused
appointed
counsel
federally
insured
bank
eustace
texas
robbed
september
man
small
strip
tape
side
face
entered
bank
pointed
pistol
female
cashier
vice
president
persons
bank
time
forced
fill
pillowcase
bank
money
man
drove
away
accomplice
waiting
stolen
car
outside
bank
march
indictment
returned
respondent
wade
two
others
conspiring
rob
bank
wade
accomplice
robbery
wade
arrested
april
counsel
appointed
represent
april
fifteen
days
later
fbi
agent
without
notice
wade
lawyer
arranged
two
bank
employees
observe
lineup
made
wade
five
six
prisoners
conducted
courtroom
local
county
courthouse
person
line
wore
strips
tape
allegedly
worn
robber
upon
direction
said
something
like
put
money
bag
words
allegedly
uttered
robber
bank
employees
identified
wade
lineup
bank
robber
trial
two
employees
asked
direct
examination
robber
courtroom
pointed
wade
prior
lineup
identification
elicited
employees
close
testimony
wade
counsel
moved
judgment
acquittal
alternatively
strike
bank
officials
courtroom
identifications
ground
conduct
lineup
without
notice
absence
appointed
counsel
violated
fifth
amendment
privilege
sixth
amendment
right
assistance
counsel
motion
denied
wade
convicted
appeals
fifth
circuit
reversed
conviction
ordered
new
trial
identification
evidence
excluded
holding
though
lineup
violate
wade
fifth
amendment
rights
lineup
held
absence
counsel
already
chosen
represent
appellant
violation
sixth
amendment
rights
granted
certiorari
set
case
oral
argument
gilbert
california
post
stovall
denno
post
present
similar
questions
reverse
judgment
appeals
remand
direction
enter
new
judgment
vacating
conviction
remanding
case
district
proceedings
consistent
opinion
prohibition
compelling
man
criminal
witness
prohibition
use
physical
moral
compulsion
extort
communications
exclusion
body
evidence
may
material
doubt
compelling
accused
merely
exhibit
person
observation
prosecution
witness
prior
trial
involves
compulsion
accused
give
evidence
testimonial
significance
compulsion
accused
exhibit
physical
characteristics
compulsion
disclose
knowledge
might
different
compelling
schmerber
provide
blood
sample
holt
wear
blouse
instances
within
cover
privilege
similarly
compelling
wade
speak
within
hearing
distance
witnesses
even
utter
words
purportedly
uttered
robber
compulsion
utter
statements
testimonial
nature
required
use
voice
identifying
physical
characteristic
speak
guilt
held
schmerber
supra
distinction
drawn
fifth
amendment
privilege
one
accused
communications
whatever
form
vocal
physical
compulsion
makes
suspect
accused
source
real
physical
evidence
schmerber
supra
recognized
federal
state
courts
usually
held
privilege
offers
protection
compulsion
submit
fingerprinting
photography
measurements
write
speak
identification
appear
stand
assume
stance
walk
make
particular
gesture
none
activities
becomes
testimonial
within
scope
privilege
required
accused
pretrial
lineup
moreover
deserves
emphasis
case
presents
question
admissibility
evidence
anything
wade
said
lineup
implicates
privilege
government
offered
evidence
part
case
came
lineup
proceedings
wade
bank
employees
involved
violation
wade
privilege
ii
framers
bill
rights
envisaged
broader
role
counsel
practice
prevailing
england
merely
advising
client
matters
law
eschewing
responsibility
matters
fact
constitutions
least
expressly
impliedly
abolished
distinction
powell
alabama
note
yale
though
colonial
provisions
counsel
accord
things
agreed
necessity
abolishing
distinction
colonists
appreciated
defendant
forced
stand
alone
state
case
foredoomed
yale
supra
background
reflected
scope
given
decisions
sixth
amendment
guarantee
accused
assistance
counsel
defense
bill
rights
adopted
organized
police
forces
know
today
accused
confronted
prosecutor
witnesses
evidence
marshalled
largely
trial
contrast
today
law
enforcement
machinery
involves
critical
confrontations
accused
prosecution
pretrial
proceedings
results
might
well
settle
accused
fate
reduce
trial
mere
formality
recognition
realities
modern
criminal
prosecution
cases
construed
sixth
amendment
guarantee
apply
critical
stages
proceedings
guarantee
reads
criminal
prosecutions
accused
shall
enjoy
right
assistance
counsel
defence
emphasis
supplied
plain
wording
guarantee
thus
encompasses
counsel
assistance
whenever
necessary
assure
meaningful
defence
early
powell
alabama
supra
recognized
period
arraignment
trial
perhaps
critical
period
proceedings
accused
requires
guiding
hand
counsel
guarantee
prove
empty
right
principle
since
applied
require
assistance
counsel
type
arraignment
example
provided
alabama
certain
rights
might
sacrificed
lost
happens
may
affect
whole
trial
available
defenses
may
irretrievably
lost
asserted
hamilton
alabama
see
white
maryland
principle
also
applied
massiah
held
incriminating
statements
defendant
excluded
evidence
appeared
overheard
federal
agents
without
notice
defendant
lawyer
arranged
meeting
defendant
accomplice
turned
informant
said
quoting
concurring
opinion
spano
new
york
nything
less
might
deny
defendant
effective
representation
counsel
stage
legal
aid
advice
help
escobedo
illinois
drew
upon
rationale
hamilton
massiah
holding
right
counsel
guaranteed
point
accused
prior
arraignment
subjected
secret
interrogation
despite
repeated
requests
see
lawyer
noted
necessity
counsel
presence
accused
fair
opportunity
present
defense
trial
rule
sought
state
however
make
trial
appeal
interrogation
right
use
counsel
formal
trial
hollow
thing
practical
purposes
conviction
already
assured
pretrial
examination
one
imagine
cynical
prosecutor
saying
let
illustrious
counsel
ca
escape
noose
nothing
counsel
trial
course
nothing
decided
said
opinions
cited
cases
links
right
counsel
protection
fifth
amendment
rights
rather
decisions
reflect
constitutional
principle
established
long
ago
powell
alabama
massiah
supra
central
principle
addition
counsel
presence
trial
accused
guaranteed
need
stand
alone
state
stage
prosecution
formal
informal
counsel
absence
might
derogate
accused
right
fair
trial
security
right
much
aim
right
counsel
guarantees
sixth
amendment
right
accused
speedy
public
trial
impartial
jury
right
informed
nature
cause
accusation
right
confronted
witnesses
compulsory
process
obtaining
witnesses
favor
presence
counsel
critical
confrontations
trial
operates
assure
accused
interests
protected
consistently
adversary
theory
criminal
prosecution
cf
pointer
texas
sum
principle
powell
alabama
succeeding
cases
requires
scrutinize
pretrial
confrontation
accused
determine
whether
presence
counsel
necessary
preserve
defendant
basic
right
fair
trial
affected
right
meaningfully
witnesses
effective
assistance
counsel
trial
calls
upon
us
analyze
whether
potential
substantial
prejudice
defendant
rights
inheres
particular
confrontation
ability
counsel
help
avoid
prejudice
iii
iv
moreover
matter
common
experience
witness
picked
accused
likely
go
back
word
later
practice
issue
identity
may
absence
relevant
evidence
practical
purposes
determined
trial
pretrial
confrontation
purpose
identification
may
take
form
lineup
also
known
identification
parade
showup
present
case
presentation
suspect
alone
witness
stovall
denno
supra
obvious
risks
suggestion
attend
either
form
confrontation
increase
dangers
inhering
eyewitness
identification
case
secret
interrogations
serious
difficulty
depicting
transpires
lineups
forms
identification
confrontations
privacy
results
secrecy
turn
results
gap
knowledge
fact
goes
miranda
arizona
supra
reasons
defense
seldom
reconstruct
manner
mode
lineup
identification
judge
jury
trial
participating
lineup
accused
may
often
police
officers
event
participants
names
rarely
recorded
divulged
trial
impediments
objective
observation
increased
victim
witness
lineups
prevalent
rape
robbery
prosecutions
present
particular
hazard
victim
understandable
outrage
may
excite
vengeful
spiteful
motives
event
neither
witnesses
lineup
participants
apt
alert
conditions
prejudicial
suspect
likely
scant
benefit
suspect
since
neither
witnesses
lineup
participants
likely
schooled
detection
suggestive
influences
improper
influences
may
go
undetected
suspect
guilty
experiences
emotional
tension
might
expect
one
confronted
potential
accusers
even
observe
abuse
criminal
record
may
reluctant
take
stand
open
admission
prior
convictions
moreover
protestations
suspect
fairness
lineup
made
trial
likely
vain
jury
choice
accused
unsupported
version
police
officers
present
short
accused
inability
effectively
reconstruct
trial
unfairness
occurred
lineup
may
deprive
opportunity
meaningfully
attack
credibility
witness
courtroom
identification
facts
disclosed
specific
cases
conduct
pretrial
confrontations
identification
illustrate
potential
substantial
prejudice
accused
stage
need
revelation
trial
commentator
provides
striking
examples
canadian
case
defendant
picked
six
men
oriental
cases
suspect
placed
among
group
persons
tall
suspects
made
stand
short
case
perpetrator
crime
known
youth
suspect
twenty
placed
five
persons
forty
potential
improper
influence
illustrated
circumstances
insofar
appear
surrounding
prior
identifications
three
cases
decide
today
present
case
testimony
identifying
witnesses
elicited
revealed
witnesses
taken
courthouse
seated
courtroom
await
assembly
lineup
courtroom
faced
hallway
observable
witnesses
open
door
cashier
testified
saw
wade
standing
hall
within
sight
fbi
agent
five
six
prisoners
later
appeared
hall
vice
president
testified
saw
person
hall
custody
agent
resembled
person
identified
one
entered
bank
lineup
gilbert
supra
conducted
auditorium
witnesses
several
alleged
state
federal
robberies
charged
gilbert
made
wholesale
identifications
gilbert
robber
presence
procedure
said
fraught
dangers
suggestion
vice
suggestion
created
identification
stovall
supra
presentation
witness
suspect
alone
handcuffed
police
officers
hard
imagine
situation
clearly
conveying
suggestion
witness
one
presented
believed
guilty
police
see
frankfurter
case
sacco
vanzetti
cases
surfaced
therefore
reveal
existence
process
attended
hazards
serious
unfairness
criminal
accused
strongly
suggest
plight
numerous
defendants
unable
ferret
suggestive
influences
secrecy
confrontation
assume
risks
result
police
procedures
intentionally
designed
prejudice
accused
rather
assume
derive
dangers
inherent
eyewitness
identification
suggestibility
inherent
context
pretrial
identification
williams
hammelmann
one
comprehensive
studies
forms
identification
said
fact
police
given
case
little
doubt
man
put
identification
committed
offense
chief
problem
getting
sufficient
proof
come
clean
involves
danger
persuasion
may
communicate
even
doubtful
case
witness
way
identification
parades
part
crim
rev
insofar
accused
conviction
may
rest
courtroom
identification
fact
fruit
suspect
pretrial
identification
accused
helpless
subject
effective
scrutiny
trial
accused
deprived
right
essential
safeguard
right
confront
witnesses
pointer
texas
even
though
precious
safeguard
fair
trial
viewed
absolute
assurance
accuracy
reliability
thus
present
context
many
variables
pitfalls
exist
first
line
defense
must
prevention
unfairness
lessening
hazards
eyewitness
identification
lineup
trial
might
determine
accused
fate
may
well
courtroom
pretrial
confrontation
state
aligned
accused
witness
sole
jury
accused
unprotected
overreaching
intentional
unintentional
little
effective
appeal
judgment
rendered
witness
man
since
appears
grave
potential
prejudice
intentional
pretrial
lineup
may
capable
reconstruction
trial
since
presence
counsel
often
avert
prejudice
assure
meaningful
confrontation
trial
little
doubt
wade
lineup
critical
stage
prosecution
much
entitled
aid
counsel
trial
powell
alabama
thus
wade
counsel
notified
impending
lineup
counsel
presence
requisite
conduct
lineup
absent
intelligent
waiver
see
carnley
cochran
substantial
countervailing
policy
considerations
advanced
requirement
presence
counsel
concern
expressed
requirement
forestall
prompt
identifications
result
obstruction
confrontations
first
note
two
cases
right
counsel
today
held
apply
counsel
already
appointed
argument
made
either
case
notice
counsel
prejudicially
delayed
confrontations
moreover
leave
open
question
whether
presence
substitute
counsel
might
suffice
notification
presence
suspect
counsel
result
prejudicial
delay
refuse
recognize
right
counsel
fear
counsel
obstruct
course
justice
contrary
basic
assumptions
upon
operated
sixth
amendment
cases
rejected
similar
logic
miranda
arizona
concerning
presence
counsel
custodial
interrogation
attorney
merely
exercising
good
professional
judgment
taught
cause
considering
attorney
menace
law
enforcement
merely
carrying
sworn
oath
protect
extent
ability
rights
client
fulfilling
responsibility
attorney
plays
vital
role
administration
criminal
justice
constitution
legislative
regulations
local
police
departments
eliminate
risks
abuse
unintentional
suggestion
lineup
proceedings
impediments
meaningful
confrontation
trial
may
also
remove
basis
regarding
stage
critical
neither
congress
federal
authorities
seen
fit
provide
solution
hold
today
way
creates
constitutional
handicap
sound
efforts
reform
intended
effect
miranda
arizona
supra
think
follows
proper
test
applied
situations
quoted
wong
sun
hether
granting
establishment
primary
illegality
evidence
instant
objection
made
come
exploitation
illegality
instead
means
sufficiently
distinguishable
purged
primary
taint
maguire
evidence
guilt
see
also
hoffa
application
test
present
context
requires
consideration
various
factors
example
prior
opportunity
observe
alleged
criminal
act
existence
discrepancy
description
defendant
actual
description
identification
prior
lineup
another
person
identification
picture
defendant
prior
lineup
failure
identify
defendant
prior
occasion
lapse
time
alleged
act
lineup
identification
also
relevant
consider
facts
despite
absence
counsel
disclosed
concerning
conduct
lineup
doubt
appeals
applied
proper
test
exclusion
identification
two
witnesses
stated
said
certainty
recognized
appellant
time
trial
intervening
lineup
occurred
testimony
two
witnesses
may
well
colored
illegal
procedure
prejudicial
moreover
persuaded
part
compulsory
verbal
responses
made
wade
instance
special
agent
ibid
implies
erroneous
holding
wade
privilege
violated
denial
counsel
required
exclusion
record
us
make
determination
whether
identifications
independent
origin
issue
trial
although
evidence
relevant
determination
inquiry
properly
made
district
therefore
think
appropriate
procedure
followed
vacate
conviction
pending
hearing
determine
whether
identifications
independent
source
whether
event
introduction
evidence
harmless
error
chapman
california
district
reinstate
conviction
order
new
trial
may
proper
see
shotwell
mfg
judgment
appeals
vacated
case
remanded
direction
enter
new
judgment
vacating
conviction
remanding
case
district
proceedings
consistent
opinion
ordered
justice
douglas
joins
opinion
except
part
phase
case
adheres
dissenting
views
schmerber
california
since
believes
compulsory
lineup
violates
privilege
contained
fifth
amendment
footnotes
see
powell
alabama
beaney
right
counsel
american
courts
see
note
yale
comment
rev
see
powell
alabama
hamilton
alabama
white
maryland
escobedo
illinois
massiah
see
cases
cited
supra
avery
alabama
borchard
convicting
innocent
frank
frank
guilty
wall
identification
criminal
cases
wigmore
evidence
ed
rolph
personal
identity
gross
criminal
investigation
jackson
ed
williams
proof
guilt
wills
circumstantial
evidence
ed
wigmore
science
judicial
proof
ed
see
wall
supra
murray
criminal
lineup
home
abroad
utah
rev
napley
problems
effecting
presentation
case
defendant
rev
williams
identification
parades
crim
rev
eng
paul
identification
accused
persons
austl
houts
evidence
proof
williams
hammelmann
identification
parades
parts
ii
crim
rev
gorphe
showing
prisoners
witnesses
identification
police
sci
wigmore
science
judicial
proof
supra
devlin
criminal
prosecution
england
williams
proof
guilt
williams
hammelmann
identification
parades
part
crim
rev
williams
hammelmann
identification
parades
part
supra
see
wall
supra
see
people
boney
people
james
cal
app
cal
rptr
see
rolph
personal
identity
bright
burden
identity
parades
lifted
innocent
participants
hover
suspect
leaving
rest
featureless
unknown
without
interest
see
williams
hammelmann
identification
parades
part
ii
crim
rev
borchard
convicting
innocent
additional
impediment
detection
influences
participants
including
suspect
physical
conditions
often
surrounding
conduct
lineup
many
lights
shine
stage
way
suspect
see
witness
see
gilbert
cir
mirror
used
said
witness
side
heard
see
rigney
hendrick
cir
aaron
state
williams
hammelmann
part
supra
napley
supra
see
groban
black
dissenting
difficult
position
defendants
attempting
protest
manner
pretrial
identification
illustrated
many
state
cases
contentions
blatant
abuse
rested
unsupportable
allegations
usually
controverted
police
officers
present
see
people
shields
cal
app
people
hicks
state
hill
redmon
commonwealth
app
lubinski
state
md
striking
case
hardly
anyone
agreed
upon
occurred
lineup
including
identified
see
johnson
state
md
instructive
example
defendant
predicament
may
found
proctor
state
md
prior
identification
admissible
maryland
salutary
rule
made
conditions
unfairness
unreliability
defendant
contention
conditions
met
stated
instant
case
facts
judgment
call
finding
identification
made
conditions
unfairness
unreliability
relatively
large
number
persons
put
room
together
victim
look
one
circumstance
indicating
fairness
fact
police
officer
unable
remember
appearances
others
recall
physical
characteristics
similar
defendant
least
suggestive
one
type
differed
markedly
looks
defendant
evidence
police
sergeant
gave
complaining
witness
indication
thirteen
men
defendant
sergeant
testimony
simply
asked
victim
identify
defendant
put
thirteen
men
courtroom
wall
identification
criminal
cases
examples
see
houts
evidence
proof
frankfurter
case
sacco
vanzetti
wigmore
evidence
ed
paul
identification
accused
persons
austl
rolph
personal
identity
see
people
james
cal
app
cal
rptr
people
boney
see
fredericksen
app
people
adell
app
state
hill
people
seppi
state
duggan
see
people
crenshaw
presley
state
md
state
ramirez
state
bazemore
barrett
state
see
aaron
state
bishop
state
ark
people
thompson
people
berne
people
martin
barrett
state
see
people
clark
gillespie
state
cr
see
people
parham
cal
see
wall
supra
napley
supra
hile
many
identification
parades
conducted
police
scrupulous
regard
fairness
unknown
identifying
witness
placed
position
see
suspect
parade
forms
williams
hammelmann
part
supra
burtt
applied
psychology
one
commentator
proposes
model
statute
providing
counsel
safeguards
well
attacks
lineup
process
averted
uniform
statute
modeled
upon
best
features
civilian
codes
proposed
statute
provide
right
counsel
lineup
confrontation
provision
made
person
whether
victim
witness
must
give
description
suspect
views
arrested
person
written
record
description
required
witness
made
sign
written
record
available
inspection
defense
counsel
copying
trial
use
trial
testing
accuracy
identification
made
lineup
trial
ideal
statute
require
least
six
persons
addition
accused
lineup
persons
approximately
height
weight
coloration
hair
skin
bodily
types
suspect
addition
men
nearly
possible
dressed
alike
distinctive
garb
used
crime
suspect
forced
wear
similar
clothing
lineup
unless
persons
similarly
garbed
complete
written
report
names
addresses
descriptive
details
persons
lineup
everything
transpired
identification
mandatory
report
include
everything
stated
identifying
witness
step
including
reasons
given
features
sparked
recognition
statute
permit
voice
identification
tests
person
lineup
repeat
identical
innocuous
phrases
impermissible
force
use
words
allegedly
used
criminal
act
statute
enjoin
police
suggesting
viewer
one
persons
lineup
arrested
suspect
one
witness
make
identification
witness
required
separately
forbidden
speak
another
witness
completed
process
statute
require
use
movie
cameras
tape
recorders
record
lineup
process
financially
able
afford
devices
finally
statute
provide
evidence
obtained
result
violation
statute
inadmissible
murray
criminal
lineup
home
abroad
utah
rev
although
right
counsel
usually
means
right
suspect
counsel
provision
substitute
counsel
may
justified
ground
substitute
counsel
presence
may
eliminate
hazards
render
lineup
critical
stage
presence
suspect
counsel
concern
also
expressed
presence
counsel
force
divulgence
identity
government
witnesses
whose
identity
government
may
want
conceal
extent
valid
significant
state
interest
police
practices
commonly
used
effect
concealment
example
masking
face
many
nations
surround
lineup
safeguards
prejudice
suspect
england
suspect
must
allowed
presence
solicitor
friend
napley
supra
germany
requires
presence
retained
counsel
france
forbids
confrontation
suspect
absence
counsel
spain
mexico
italy
provide
detailed
procedures
prescribing
conditions
confrontation
must
occur
supervision
judicial
officer
sees
proceedings
officially
recorded
assure
adequate
scrutiny
trial
murray
criminal
lineup
home
abroad
utah
rev
thirty
years
ago
wigmore
suggested
scientific
method
pretrial
identification
reduce
risk
error
hitherto
inherent
proceedings
wigmore
science
judicial
proof
ed
approach
least
talking
films
prepared
men
various
occupations
races
etc
photographed
number
stock
movements
without
hat
coat
read
aloud
standard
passage
suspect
filmed
manner
films
shown
succession
special
projection
room
witness
provided
electric
button
activate
board
backstage
pressed
indicate
witness
identified
given
person
provision
made
degree
hesitancy
identification
indicated
number
presses
course
systematic
scientific
process
proceeding
including
one
purposes
identification
less
impediment
reconstruction
conditions
bearing
upon
reliability
process
proceeding
trial
see
discussion
fingerprint
like
tests
part
iii
supra
handwriting
exemplars
gilbert
california
supra
see
goldstein
murphy
dissenting
fter
accused
sustains
initial
burden
imposed
nardone
proving
satisfaction
trial
judge
preliminary
hearing
unlawfully
employed
petitioners
fair
burden
shift
government
convince
trial
judge
proof
independent
origin
reach
contrary
conclusion
gilbert
california
supra
admissibility
witness
testimony
also
identified
accused
lineup
thus
case
matters
well
witness
knows
suspect
whether
witness
suspect
mother
brother
associate
matter
long
well
witness
observed
perpetrator
scene
crime
factors
important
bearing
upon
true
basis
witness
identification
moreover
state
inability
bolster
witness
courtroom
identification
introduction
lineup
identification
see
gilbert
california
supra
become
less
significant
evidence
opportunities
witness
observe
defendant
thus
witness
kidnap
victim
lived
days
abductor
value
state
admission
lineup
identification
indeed
marginal
identification
mere
formality
justice
clark
concurring
reference
lineup
point
involved
case
life
see
lineup
critical
stage
prosecution
identification
suspect
prerequisite
establishment
guilt
occurs
stage
miranda
arizona
books
requirement
presence
counsel
arises
unless
waived
suspect
dissented
miranda
bound
schmerber
california
precludes
petitioner
claim
therefore
join
opinion
justice
black
dissenting
part
concurring
part
march
respondent
wade
indicted
robbing
bank
april
arrested
april
appointed
lawyer
represent
fifteen
days
later
wade
still
custody
fbi
agent
took
several
prisoners
room
courthouse
directed
participate
lineup
wearing
strips
tape
face
speak
words
used
robber
bank
done
order
let
bank
employee
witnesses
look
wade
identification
purposes
wade
lawyer
notified
present
lineup
protect
client
interests
wade
trial
two
bank
employees
identified
courtroom
wade
objected
testimony
counsel
elicited
witnesses
fact
seen
wade
lineup
contended
forcing
participate
lineup
wear
strips
tape
face
repeat
words
used
robber
without
counsel
government
compelled
witness
violation
fifth
amendment
deprived
assistance
counsel
defense
violation
sixth
amendment
part
opinion
rejects
wade
fifth
amendment
contention
dissent
parts
opinion
sustains
wade
claim
denial
right
counsel
lineup
concur
part
remands
case
district
consider
whether
courtroom
identification
wade
fruit
illegal
lineup
grant
new
trial
unless
concludes
courtroom
identification
harmless
error
reverse
appeals
reversal
wade
conviction
remand
proceedings
since
prosecution
use
lineup
identification
wade
trial
believe
conviction
affirmed
ii
agree
counsel
presence
lineup
necessary
protect
accused
right
fair
trial
fair
trial
means
trial
accordance
law
land
specifically
set
constitution
implications
opinion
fair
trial
means
trial
majority
deems
fair
lineup
critical
stage
assessing
innumerable
dangers
inhere
thinks
implications
justified
evidenced
suggestion
egislative
regulations
eliminate
risks
abuse
lineup
proceedings
may
also
remove
basis
regarding
stage
critical
clear
opinion
gilbert
california
post
willing
make
sixth
amendment
guarantee
right
counsel
dependent
view
whether
particular
stage
proceedings
though
critical
sense
prosecution
gathering
evidence
critical
view
fair
trial
wholly
unwilling
make
specific
constitutional
right
counsel
dependent
judges
vague
transitory
notions
fairness
equally
transitory
though
thought
empirical
assessment
risk
counsel
absence
might
derogate
defendant
right
fair
trial
ante
see
pointer
texas
concurring
opinion
goldberg
iii
first
place
even
power
establish
rule
evidence
think
rule
fashioned
unsound
tainted
fruit
determination
required
involves
considerable
difficulty
think
practically
impossible
witness
capable
probing
recesses
mind
draw
sharp
line
courtroom
identification
due
exclusively
earlier
lineup
courtroom
identification
due
memory
based
lineup
kind
clear
convincing
evidence
prosecution
offer
prove
upon
particular
events
memories
resulting
identification
rest
long
trials
delayed
judges
turn
psychologists
probe
subconscious
minds
witnesses
questions
posed
answered
opinion
view
fifth
sixth
amendments
satisfied
prosecution
precluded
using
lineup
identification
either
alternative
corroboration
courtroom
identification
prosecution
neither
witnesses
oath
identify
defendant
courtroom
find
justification
stopping
trial
midstream
hold
lengthy
tainted
fruit
hearing
fact
circumstances
surrounding
prior
lineup
identification
might
used
defense
impeach
credibility
identifications
exclude
completely
important
constitutional
provision
upon
rely
directly
implication
gives
power
establish
amounts
constitutional
rule
evidence
govern
federal
government
trial
state
crimes
state
laws
state
courts
see
gilbert
california
supra
constitution
deliberately
reposed
broad
power
create
try
crimes
according
rules
policies
spencer
texas
deprived
power
least
ask
able
point
federal
constitutional
provision
either
express
language
necessary
implication
grants
us
power
fashion
novel
rule
evidence
govern
criminal
trials
cf
berger
new
york
ante
black
dissenting
neither
nardone
wong
sun
federal
cases
decided
contexts
supports
demands
today
perhaps
presumes
write
constitutional
rule
evidence
basis
fourteenth
amendment
due
process
clause
time
place
consider
claim
suffice
say
briefly
find
authority
due
process
clause
undoubtedly
provides
person
must
tried
accordance
law
land
consequently
violates
due
process
try
person
way
prohibited
fourth
fifth
sixth
amendments
written
constitution
never
able
subscribe
dogma
due
process
clause
empowers
declare
law
including
rule
evidence
unconstitutional
believes
contrary
tradition
decency
fundamental
justice
words
used
judges
claim
power
due
process
clause
see
rochin
california
abiding
idea
framers
wanted
let
judges
write
constitution
beliefs
said
instead
carefully
defining
grants
prohibitions
written
constitution
authority
due
process
clause
wholly
unwilling
tell
state
federal
courts
constitution
forbids
allow
courtroom
identification
without
prosecution
first
proving
identification
rest
whole
part
illegal
lineup
feel
deciding
constitution
says
think
wise
framers
put
judicial
activism
worst
leave
federal
government
free
decide
rules
evidence
believe
constitutional
prerogative
affirm
wade
conviction
justice
white
justice
harlan
justice
stewart
join
dissenting
part
concurring
part
propounded
broad
constitutional
rule
barring
use
wide
spectrum
relevant
probative
evidence
solely
step
ascertainment
discovery
occurs
outside
presence
defense
counsel
approach
miranda
arizona
objected
thought
uncritical
doctrinaire
approach
without
satisfactory
factual
foundation
much
view
present
ruling
therefore
dissent
judgment
parts
ii
iv
opinion
opinion
proceeds
first
creating
new
per
se
rule
constitutional
law
criminal
suspect
subjected
pretrial
identification
process
absence
counsel
without
violating
sixth
amendment
state
may
buttress
later
courtroom
identification
witness
reference
previous
identification
furthermore
courtroom
identification
admissible
unless
state
establish
clear
convincing
proof
testimony
fruit
earlier
identification
made
absence
defendant
counsel
admittedly
heavy
burden
state
probably
impossible
one
intents
purposes
courtroom
identifications
barred
pretrial
identifications
occurred
without
counsel
present
rule
applies
lineup
techniques
employed
produce
identification
fortiori
encounter
witness
suspect
alone
regardless
identification
occurs
time
place
whether
indictment
information
matters
well
witness
knows
suspect
whether
witness
suspect
mother
brother
associate
matter
long
well
witness
observed
perpetrator
scene
crime
kidnap
victim
lived
days
abductor
category
witness
fleeting
glimpse
criminal
neither
may
identify
suspect
without
defendant
counsel
present
strictures
apply
regardless
number
witnesses
positively
identify
defendant
regardless
corroborative
evidence
showing
defendant
committed
crime
premise
rule
general
unreliability
eyewitness
identifications
difficulties
inherent
observation
recall
recognition
assumes
narrower
evil
basis
rule
improper
police
suggestion
contributes
erroneous
identifications
apparently
believes
improper
police
procedures
widespread
broad
prophylactic
rule
must
laid
requiring
presence
counsel
pretrial
identifications
order
detect
recurring
instances
police
misconduct
share
pervasive
distrust
official
investigations
none
materials
relies
upon
supports
certainly
bow
solid
fact
quite
obviously
reliable
comprehensive
survey
current
police
practices
base
new
rule
avoid
excluding
relevant
evidence
state
criminal
trials
cf
washington
texas
ante
goes
beyond
assuming
great
majority
country
police
departments
following
improper
practices
pretrial
identifications
find
lineup
critical
stage
proceeding
exclude
identifications
made
absence
counsel
must
also
assume
police
suggestion
occurs
leads
erroneous
rather
accurate
identifications
reprehensible
police
conduct
unavoidable
largely
undiscoverable
impact
trial
turn
assumes
adequate
source
defense
counsel
learn
circumstances
pretrial
identification
order
place
jury
considerations
enter
appraisal
courtroom
identification
evidence
treacherous
unsupported
assumptions
resting
notion
defendant
aware
police
witnesses
forget
prevaricate
defense
counsel
unable
bring
truth
neither
jury
judge
appellate
sufficient
safeguard
unacceptable
police
conduct
occurring
pretrial
identification
procedure
unable
share
view
willingness
police
ordinary
dissemble
either
respect
identification
defendant
respect
circumstances
surrounding
pretrial
identification
several
striking
aspects
holding
first
rule
bar
courtroom
identifications
previous
identifications
presence
police
although
identified
courtroom
defendant
known
custody
charged
commission
crime
second
seems
say
suitable
legislative
standards
adopted
conduct
pretrial
identifications
thereby
lessening
hazards
confrontations
insist
presence
counsel
true
simply
fashion
deems
constitutionally
acceptable
procedures
authorities
follow
certainly
correct
suggesting
new
rule
wholly
inapplicable
police
departments
established
suitable
safeguards
third
courtroom
identification
may
barred
absent
counsel
prior
identification
regardless
extent
counsel
information
concerning
circumstances
previous
confrontation
witness
defendant
apparently
even
recordings
events
occurred
rule
premised
defendant
right
counsel
know
seems
little
basis
accepting
means
inform
disinterested
observer
recordings
photographs
one
seem
adequate
furnish
basis
meaningful
eyewitness
identifies
defendant
courtroom
share
view
criminal
trial
least
aim
truthful
factfinding
including
accurate
eyewitness
identifications
doubt
however
basis
present
information
tragic
mistakes
occurred
criminal
trials
much
product
improper
police
conduct
consequence
difficulties
inherent
eyewitness
testimony
resolving
evidentiary
conflicts
jury
doubt
new
rule
obviate
difficulties
situation
measurably
improved
inserting
defense
counsel
investigative
processes
police
departments
everywhere
may
asked
possible
state
interest
militates
requiring
presence
defense
counsel
lineups
argument
goes
may
good
may
upgrade
quality
identification
evidence
state
courts
scarcely
harm
even
true
feeble
foundation
fastening
ironclad
constitutional
rule
upon
state
criminal
procedures
absent
reliably
established
constitutional
violation
processes
enforce
criminal
laws
prerogative
interest
conducting
affairs
interest
displaced
simply
saying
valid
arguments
respect
merits
federal
rule
emanating
beyond
however
requiring
counsel
pretrial
identifications
invariable
rule
trenches
valid
state
interests
one
concern
prompt
efficient
enforcement
criminal
laws
identifications
frequently
take
place
arrest
indictment
returned
information
filed
police
may
arrested
suspect
probable
cause
may
still
wrong
man
suspect
state
every
interest
prompt
identification
stage
suspect
order
secure
immediate
release
state
prompt
early
identification
enhances
accurate
identification
must
know
whether
right
investigative
track
unavoidably
however
absolute
rule
requiring
presence
counsel
cause
significant
delay
may
well
result
pretrial
identification
counsel
must
appointed
time
arranged
convenient
witnesses
meanwhile
may
necessary
file
charges
suspect
may
released
bail
federal
system
often
recognizance
neither
state
defendant
benefit
properly
conducted
identification
procedure
think
witnesses
ignored
required
present
convenience
counsel
rather
many
may
much
less
willing
participate
identification
stage
transformed
adversary
proceeding
control
judge
others
may
fear
safety
identity
known
early
date
especially
way
knowing
lineup
occurs
whether
police
really
right
man
finally
think
new
rule
vulnerable
terms
unimpeachable
purpose
increasing
reliability
identification
testimony
law
enforcement
officers
obligation
convict
guilty
make
sure
convict
innocent
must
dedicated
making
criminal
trial
procedure
ascertainment
true
facts
surrounding
commission
crime
extent
adversary
system
adversary
defense
counsel
comparable
obligation
ascertain
present
truth
system
assigns
different
mission
must
interested
preventing
conviction
innocent
absent
voluntary
plea
guilty
also
insist
defend
client
whether
innocent
guilty
state
obligation
present
evidence
defense
counsel
need
present
nothing
even
knows
truth
need
furnish
witnesses
police
reveal
confidences
client
furnish
information
help
prosecution
case
confuse
witness
even
truthful
one
make
appear
disadvantage
unsure
indecisive
normal
course
interest
convicting
innocent
permits
counsel
put
state
proof
put
state
case
worst
possible
light
regardless
thinks
knows
truth
undoubtedly
limits
defense
counsel
must
observe
often
defense
counsel
prosecution
witness
impeach
even
thinks
witness
telling
truth
attempt
destroy
witness
thinks
lying
respect
part
modified
adversary
system
part
duty
imposed
honorable
defense
counsel
countenance
require
conduct
many
instances
little
relation
search
truth
extend
system
least
presently
operates
police
investigations
require
counsel
presence
pretrial
identification
procedures
counsel
interest
client
placed
scene
crime
regardless
whereabouts
counsel
may
advise
clients
refuse
make
movements
speak
words
lineup
even
appear
one
extent
impact
truthful
factfinding
quite
obvious
others
observe
occurs
develop
possibilities
later
hover
witnesses
begin
menacing
truthful
factfinding
thoroughly
fears
police
certainly
implicit
invitation
counsel
suggest
rules
lineup
manage
produce
best
therefore
doubt
new
rule
least
absent
clearly
defined
limits
counsel
role
measurably
contribute
reliable
pretrial
identifications
fears
precisely
opposite
result
may
well
produce
fewer
convictions
hardly
proper
measure
acceptability
view
state
entitled
investigate
develop
case
outside
presence
defense
counsel
includes
right
private
conversations
identification
witnesses
defense
counsel
may
consultations
witnesses
without
prosecutor
present
whether
today
judgment
acceptable
exercise
supervisory
power
federal
courts
another
question
constitutional
matter
judgment
case
erroneous
although
concur
parts
iii
opinion
respectfully
register
dissent
yet
stovall
denno
post
recognizes
improper
police
conduct
identification
process
widespread
justify
full
retroactivity
new
rule
miranda
arizona
noted
fundamentals
criminal
investigation
text
enjoyed
extensive
use
among
law
enforcement
agencies
among
students
police
science
quality
work
said
rest
author
long
service
observer
lecturer
police
science
work
federal
crime
investigator
suggest
police
use
identification
machinery
improperly
instead
argues
techniques
increase
reliability
eyewitness
identifications
reason
suggest
views
shared
practiced
majority
police
departments
throughout
land
instant
case
companions
gilbert
california
post
stovall
denno
post
certainly
lend
support
assumptions
police
conduct
deemed
improper
three
cases
seems
come
light
trial
ordinary
course
events
one
ask
counsel
learned
pretrial
identifications
relevant
truth
determination
trial
premises
constitutional
rule
police
conduct
subtle
defy
description
subsequent
disclosure
deals
pure
speculation
police
conduct
intentionally
veiled
police
know
unwilling
speculate
defense
counsel
trial
unable
reconstruct
known
circumstances
pretrial
identification
unknown
influence
identifications
innocent
general
premise
evaporates
problem
simply
inherent
shortcomings
eyewitness
testimony
thought
state
interest
regarding
sources
identification
less
interest
protecting
informants
especially
may
aid
identification
used
witnesses
see
mccray
illinois
attorney
representative
ordinary
party
controversy
sovereignty
whose
obligation
govern
impartially
compelling
obligation
govern
whose
interest
therefore
criminal
prosecution
shall
win
case
justice
shall
done
peculiar
definite
sense
servant
law
twofold
aim
guilt
shall
escape
innocence
suffer
may
prosecute
earnestness
vigor
indeed
may
strike
hard
blows
liberty
strike
foul
ones
much
duty
refrain
improper
methods
calculated
produce
wrongful
conviction
use
every
legitimate
means
bring
one
berger
see
also
mooney
holohan
pyle
kansas
alcorta
texas
napue
illinois
brady
maryland
giles
maryland
miller
pate
one
point
view
role
courtroom
lawyer
appears
frank
courts
trial
role
lawyers
bringing
evidence
trial
may
learn
reading
one
dozen
handbooks
try
experienced
lawyer
uses
sorts
stratagems
minimize
effect
judge
jury
testimony
disadvantageous
client
even
lawyer
doubt
accuracy
honesty
testimony
witness
happens
timid
frightened
unfamiliarity
ways
lawyer
plays
weakness
order
confuse
witness
make
appear
concealing
significant
facts
longenecker
book
hints
trial
law
suit
book
endorsed
great
wigmore
writing
truthful
honest
witness
tells
skilful
advocate
rapid
may
ruin
testimony
witness
author
even
hint
disapproval
accomplishment
longenecker
similar
books
recommend
lawyer
try
prod
irritable
honest
adverse
witness
displaying
undesirable
characteristics
unpleasant
form
order
discredit
judge
jury
may
writes
harris
sometimes
destroy
effect
adverse
witness
making
appear
hostile
really
may
make
exaggerate
unsay
something
say
taft
says
clever
dealing
honest
egotistic
witness
deftly
tempt
witness
indulge
propensity
exaggeration
make
hang
thus
adds
taft
may
happen
value
testimony
lost
side
produces
suffers
seeking
aid
source
although
add
may
source
evidence
fact
decision
turn
intimidating
manner
putting
questions
writes
wigmore
may
coerce
disconcert
witness
answers
represent
actual
knowledge
subject
also
questions
form
subject
cause
embarrassment
shame
anger
witness
may
unfairly
lead
demeanor
utterances
impression
produced
statements
justice
real
testimonial
value
see
materials
collected
countryman
finman
lawyer
modern
society
joint
committee
continuing
legal
education
american
law
institute
american
bar
association
problem
criminal
defense
stovall
aspects
advocate
dual
responsibility
alabama
lawyer
gold
split
loyalty
ethical
problem
criminal
defense
lawyer
rev
symposium
professional
ethics
rev
justice
fortas
chief
justice
justice
douglas
join
concurring
part
dissenting
part
agree
exhibition
person
accused
lineup
violation
privilege
subject
constitutional
objection
exhibition
person
accused
courtroom
identification
purposes
incident
state
power
arrest
reasonable
justifiable
aspect
state
custody
resulting
arrest
require
accused
take
affirmative
volitional
action
duly
arrested
may
seen
identification
purposes
however
critical
stage
prosecution
agree
opportunity
counsel
present
must
made
available
view
however
accused
may
compelled
lineup
speak
words
uttered
person
committed
crime
confident
compelled
compelled
lineup
passive
mute
assistance
eyes
victim
witnesses
kind
volitional
act
kind
forced
cooperation
accused
within
historical
perimeter
privilege
compelled
history
tradition
teach
command
accused
may
stand
mute
privilege
means
less
according
accused
may
jailed
indefinitely
willing
say
identifying
audience
whatever
said
course
commission
crime
presumably
include
money
life
perhaps
words
assault
rape
case
intolerable
constitutional
system
completely
agree
accused
must
advised
given
right
counsel
lineup
join
part
opinion
empty
right
unless
mean
insist
upon
accused
fundamental
constitutional
immunities
one
accused
may
compelled
speak
compel
speak
violate
privilege
incorporated
fifth
amendment
great
privilege
merely
shield
accused
also
prescription
technique
designed
guide
state
investigation
history
teaches
us
unreliable
instrument
detection
apt
inculpate
enable
guilty
escape
end
story
privilege
historically
goes
roots
democratic
religious
principle
prevents
debasement
citizen
result
compelling
accuse
power
state
roots
privilege
deeper
rack
screw
used
extort
confessions
go
nature
free
man
relationship
state
accused
compelled
utter
words
spoken
criminal
course
crime
thoroughly
disagree
statement
compulsion
violate
fifth
amendment
relies
upon
schmerber
california
support
dissented
schmerber
controlling
course
acknowledge
binding
effect
unless
prepared
overrule
schmerber
authorized
forced
extraction
blood
veins
unwilling
human
compel
person
actively
cooperate
accuse
volitional
act
differs
degree
compelling
act
crime
assume
rebuffed
latter
feature
places
compelled
utterance
accused
squarely
within
history
noble
purpose
fifth
amendment
commandment
permit
schmerber
apply
respect
beyond
holding
opinion
indefensible
permit
insidious
doctrine
extend
beyond
invasion
body
permits
compulsion
man
deny
defy
precious
part
historical
faith
discard
one
profoundly
cherished
instruments
established
freedom
dignity
individual
alter
balance
rights
individual
state
achieved
centuries
conflict
holds
accused
must
advised
given
right
counsel
lineup
makes
privilege
meaningless
important
respect
unless
counsel
waived
present
objected
accused
utterance
words
used
course
committing
crime
compel
utterance
constitutional
error
accordingly
join
requiring
vacating
judgment
determination
whether
identification
respondent
based
upon
factors
independent
lineup
failure
offer
counsel
lineup
also
violation
respondent
fifth
amendment
rights
conceivable
legislation
might
provide
meticulous
lineup
procedure
satisfy
constitutional
requirements
agree
remove
basis
regarding
lineup
stage
critical