south
dakota
dole
argued
april
decided
june
title
supp
iii
directs
secretary
transportation
withhold
percentage
otherwise
allocable
federal
highway
funds
purchase
public
possession
alcoholic
beverage
person
less
years
age
lawful
south
dakota
permits
persons
years
old
older
purchase
beer
containing
alcohol
sued
federal
district
declaratory
judgment
violates
constitutional
limitations
congressional
exercise
spending
power
art
cl
constitution
violates
amendment
district
rejected
state
claims
appeals
affirmed
held
even
congress
view
amendment
might
lack
power
impose
directly
national
minimum
drinking
age
question
decided
indirect
encouragement
state
action
obtain
uniformity
drinking
ages
valid
use
spending
power
pp
incident
spending
power
congress
may
attach
conditions
receipt
federal
funds
however
exercise
power
subject
certain
restrictions
including
must
pursuit
general
welfare
section
consistent
restriction
since
means
chosen
congress
address
dangerous
situation
interstate
problem
resulting
incentive
created
differing
state
drinking
ages
young
persons
combine
drinking
driving
reasonably
calculated
advance
general
welfare
section
also
consistent
spending
power
restrictions
congress
desires
condition
receipt
federal
funds
must
unambiguously
enabling
exercise
choice
knowingly
cognizant
consequences
participation
conditions
federal
grants
must
related
national
concern
safe
interstate
travel
pp
invalidated
spending
power
limitation
conditional
grant
federal
funds
must
independently
barred
constitutional
provisions
amendment
limitation
prohibition
indirect
achievement
objectives
congress
empowered
achieve
directly
instead
means
power
may
used
induce
engage
activities
unconstitutional
south
dakota
succumb
congress
blandishments
raise
drinking
age
action
violate
anyone
constitutional
rights
moreover
relatively
small
financial
inducement
offered
congress
resulting
state
loss
federal
funds
otherwise
obtainable
certain
highway
grant
programs
coercive
pass
point
pressure
turns
compulsion
pp
rehnquist
delivered
opinion
white
marshall
blackmun
powell
stevens
scalia
joined
brennan
post
post
filed
dissenting
opinions
roger
tellinghuisen
attorney
general
south
dakota
argued
cause
petitioner
briefs
craig
eichstadt
assistant
attorney
general
deputy
solicitor
general
cohen
argued
cause
respondent
brief
solicitor
general
fried
assistant
attorney
general
willard
andrew
pincus
leonard
schaitman
robert
zener
briefs
amici
curiae
urging
reversal
filed
state
colorado
et
al
anthony
celebrezze
attorney
general
ohio
william
damsel
shawn
nau
assistant
attorneys
general
joel
taylor
nancy
miller
joined
attorneys
general
respective
follows
duane
woodard
colorado
warren
price
iii
hawaii
robert
stephan
kansas
william
guste
louisiana
mike
greely
montana
travis
medlock
south
carolina
michael
cody
tennessee
jeffrey
amestoy
vermont
joseph
meyer
wyoming
mountain
legal
foundation
et
al
hal
stratton
attorney
general
new
mexico
constance
brooks
casey
shpall
national
conference
state
legislatures
et
al
benna
ruth
solomon
beate
bloch
larry
simms
national
beer
wholesalers
association
et
al
barrett
prettyman
john
roberts
john
stasiowski
phillip
macdonnell
et
al
morton
siegel
michael
moses
richard
schoenstadt
james
webster
briefs
amici
curiae
urging
affirmance
filed
insurance
institute
highway
safety
et
al
andrew
hricko
michele
mcdowell
fields
ronald
precup
national
council
alcoholism
et
al
charles
walker
iii
national
safety
council
harry
rosenfield
senator
frank
lautenberg
et
al
thomas
campion
michael
faigen
chief
justice
rehnquist
delivered
opinion
petitioner
south
dakota
permits
persons
years
age
older
purchase
beer
containing
alcohol
codified
laws
congress
enacted
supp
iii
directs
secretary
transportation
withhold
percentage
federal
highway
funds
otherwise
allocable
purchase
public
possession
alcoholic
beverage
person
less
years
age
lawful
state
sued
district
seeking
declaratory
judgment
violates
constitutional
limitations
congressional
exercise
spending
power
violates
amendment
constitution
district
rejected
state
claims
appeals
eighth
circuit
affirmed
parties
direct
efforts
defining
proper
scope
amendment
relying
statement
california
retail
liquor
dealers
assn
midcal
aluminum
amendment
grants
virtually
complete
control
whether
permit
importation
sale
liquor
structure
liquor
distribution
system
south
dakota
asserts
setting
minimum
drinking
ages
clearly
within
core
powers
reserved
amendment
brief
petitioner
section
petitioner
claims
usurps
core
power
secretary
response
asserts
amendment
simply
implicated
plain
language
confirms
broad
power
impose
restrictions
sale
distribution
alcoholic
beverages
confer
power
permit
sales
congress
seeks
prohibit
brief
respondent
amendment
reasoning
prevent
congress
affirmatively
enacting
national
minimum
drinking
age
restrictive
provided
various
state
laws
follow
fortiori
indirect
inducement
involved
compatible
amendment
arguments
present
questions
meaning
amendment
bounds
escaped
precise
definition
bacchus
imports
dias
craig
boren
despite
extended
treatment
question
parties
however
need
decide
case
whether
amendment
prohibit
attempt
congress
legislate
directly
national
minimum
drinking
age
congress
acted
indirectly
spending
power
encourage
uniformity
drinking
ages
explain
find
legislative
effort
within
constitutional
bounds
even
congress
may
regulate
drinking
ages
directly
constitution
empowers
congress
lay
collect
taxes
duties
imposts
excises
pay
debts
provide
common
defence
general
welfare
art
cl
incident
power
congress
may
attach
conditions
receipt
federal
funds
repeatedly
employed
power
broad
policy
objectives
conditioning
receipt
federal
moneys
upon
compliance
recipient
federal
statutory
administrative
directives
fullilove
klutznick
opinion
burger
see
lau
nichols
ivanhoe
irrigation
dist
mccracken
oklahoma
civil
service
steward
machine
davis
breadth
power
made
clear
butler
resolving
longstanding
debate
scope
spending
clause
determined
power
congress
authorize
expenditure
public
moneys
public
purposes
limited
direct
grants
legislative
power
found
constitution
thus
objectives
thought
within
article
enumerated
legislative
fields
may
nevertheless
attained
use
spending
power
conditional
grant
federal
funds
spending
power
course
unlimited
pennhurst
state
school
hospital
halderman
instead
subject
several
general
restrictions
articulated
cases
first
limitations
derived
language
constitution
exercise
spending
power
must
pursuit
general
welfare
see
helvering
davis
butler
supra
considering
whether
particular
expenditure
intended
serve
general
public
purposes
courts
defer
substantially
judgment
congress
helvering
davis
supra
second
required
congress
desires
condition
receipt
federal
funds
must
unambiguously
enabl
ing
exercise
choice
knowingly
cognizant
consequences
participation
pennhurst
state
school
hospital
halderman
supra
third
cases
suggested
without
significant
elaboration
conditions
federal
grants
might
illegitimate
unrelated
federal
interest
particular
national
projects
programs
massachusetts
plurality
opinion
see
also
ivanhoe
irrigation
dist
mccracken
supra
federal
government
may
establish
impose
reasonable
conditions
relevant
federal
interest
project
objectives
thereof
finally
noted
constitutional
provisions
may
provide
independent
bar
conditional
grant
federal
funds
lawrence
county
school
buckley
valeo
per
curiam
king
smith
south
dakota
seriously
claim
inconsistent
first
three
restrictions
mentioned
readily
conclude
provision
designed
serve
general
welfare
especially
light
fact
concept
welfare
opposite
shaped
congress
helvering
davis
supra
congress
found
differing
drinking
ages
created
particular
incentives
young
persons
combine
desire
drink
ability
drive
interstate
problem
required
national
solution
means
chose
address
dangerous
situation
reasonably
calculated
advance
general
welfare
conditions
upon
receive
funds
moreover
clearly
stated
congress
see
supp
iii
state
rather
challenging
germaneness
condition
federal
purposes
admits
never
contended
congressional
action
unrelated
national
concern
absence
amendment
brief
petitioner
indeed
condition
imposed
congress
directly
related
one
main
purposes
highway
funds
expended
safe
interstate
travel
see
goal
interstate
highway
system
frustrated
varying
drinking
ages
among
presidential
commission
appointed
study
accidents
fatalities
nation
highways
concluded
lack
uniformity
drinking
ages
created
incentive
drink
drive
young
persons
commut
border
drinking
age
lower
presidential
commission
drunk
driving
final
report
enacting
congress
conditioned
receipt
federal
funds
way
reasonably
calculated
address
particular
impediment
purpose
funds
expended
remaining
question
validity
basic
point
disagreement
parties
whether
amendment
constitutes
independent
constitutional
bar
conditional
grant
federal
funds
lawrence
county
school
supra
petitioner
relying
view
amendment
prohibits
direct
regulation
drinking
ages
congress
asserts
congress
may
use
spending
power
regulate
prohibited
regulating
directly
amendment
brief
petitioner
cases
show
independent
constitutional
bar
limitation
spending
power
kind
petitioner
suggests
butler
supra
example
established
constitutional
limitations
congress
exercising
spending
power
less
exacting
authority
regulate
directly
also
held
perceived
tenth
amendment
limitation
congressional
regulation
state
affairs
concomitantly
limit
range
conditions
legitimately
placed
federal
grants
oklahoma
civil
service
considered
validity
hatch
act
insofar
applied
political
activities
state
officials
whose
employment
financed
whole
part
federal
funds
state
contended
order
provision
withhold
certain
federal
funds
unless
state
official
removed
invaded
sovereignty
violation
tenth
amendment
though
finding
concerned
power
regulate
local
political
activities
state
officials
nevertheless
held
federal
government
power
fix
terms
upon
money
allotments
shall
disbursed
found
violation
state
sovereignty
state
adopt
simple
expedient
yielding
urges
federal
coercion
offer
benefits
state
dependent
upon
cooperation
state
federal
plans
assumedly
general
welfare
unusual
citation
omitted
see
also
steward
machine
davis
condition
state
free
pleasure
disregard
fulfill
massachusetts
mellon
cases
establish
independent
constitutional
bar
limitation
spending
power
petitioner
suggests
prohibition
indirect
achievement
objectives
congress
empowered
achieve
directly
instead
think
language
earlier
opinions
stands
unexceptionable
proposition
power
may
used
induce
engage
activities
unconstitutional
thus
example
grant
federal
funds
conditioned
invidiously
discriminatory
state
action
infliction
cruel
unusual
punishment
illegitimate
exercise
congress
broad
spending
power
claim
made
south
dakota
succumb
blandishments
offered
congress
raise
drinking
age
state
action
violate
constitutional
rights
anyone
decisions
recognized
circumstances
financial
inducement
offered
congress
might
coercive
pass
point
pressure
turns
compulsion
steward
machine
davis
supra
however
congress
directed
state
desiring
establish
minimum
drinking
age
lower
lose
relatively
small
percentage
certain
federal
highway
funds
petitioner
contends
coercive
nature
program
evident
degree
success
achieved
conclude
however
conditional
grant
federal
money
sort
unconstitutional
simply
reason
success
achieving
congressional
objective
consider
moment
south
dakota
lose
adheres
chosen
course
suitable
minimum
drinking
age
funds
otherwise
obtainable
specified
highway
grant
programs
argument
coercion
shown
rhetoric
fact
said
half
century
ago
steward
machine
davis
rebate
tax
conditioned
upon
conduct
measure
temptation
hold
motive
temptation
equivalent
coercion
plunge
law
endless
difficulties
outcome
doctrine
acceptance
philosophical
determinism
choice
becomes
impossible
till
law
guided
robust
common
sense
assumes
freedom
working
hypothesis
solution
problems
affirmed
footnotes
level
deference
congressional
decision
recently
questioned
whether
general
welfare
judicially
enforceable
restriction
see
buckley
valeo
per
curiam
cases
required
define
outer
bounds
germaneness
relatedness
limitation
imposition
conditions
spending
power
amici
urge
take
occasion
establish
condition
federal
funds
legitimate
relates
directly
purpose
expenditure
attached
see
brief
national
conference
state
legislatures
et
al
amici
curiae
petitioner
sought
restriction
see
tr
oral
arg
find
limitation
conditional
federal
grants
satisfied
case
event
address
whether
conditions
less
directly
related
particular
purpose
expenditure
might
outside
bounds
spending
power
justice
brennan
dissenting
agree
justice
regulation
minimum
age
purchasers
liquor
falls
squarely
within
ambit
powers
reserved
amendment
see
post
since
possess
constitutional
power
congress
condition
federal
grant
manner
abridges
right
amendment
strikes
proper
balance
federal
state
authority
therefore
dissent
justice
dissenting
today
upholds
national
minimum
drinking
age
amendment
supp
iii
valid
exercise
spending
power
conferred
article
condition
spending
reasonably
related
expenditure
federal
funds
justified
ground
rather
attempt
regulate
sale
liquor
attempt
lies
outside
congress
power
regulate
commerce
falls
within
ambit
amendment
disagreement
relatively
narrow
spending
power
issue
disagreement
application
principle
rather
disagreement
principle
agree
congress
may
attach
conditions
receipt
federal
funds
federal
interest
particular
national
projects
programs
massachusetts
see
oklahoma
civil
service
steward
machine
davis
also
subscribe
established
proposition
reach
spending
power
limited
direct
grants
legislative
power
found
constitution
butler
finally
agree
four
separate
types
limitations
spending
power
expenditure
must
general
welfare
helvering
davis
conditions
imposed
must
unambiguous
pennhurst
state
school
hospital
halderman
must
reasonably
related
purpose
expenditure
massachusetts
supra
legislation
may
violate
independent
constitutional
prohibition
lawrence
county
school
ante
insofar
two
limitations
concerned
clearly
correct
wholly
unobjectionable
establishment
national
minimum
drinking
age
certainly
fits
within
broad
concept
general
welfare
statute
entirely
unambiguous
also
willing
assume
arguendo
amendment
constitute
independent
constitutional
bar
spending
condition
see
ante
application
requirement
condition
imposed
reasonably
related
purpose
funds
expended
cursory
unconvincing
repeatedly
said
congress
may
condition
grants
spending
power
ways
reasonably
related
purpose
federal
program
massachusetts
supra
ivanhoe
irrigation
dist
mccracken
may
impose
reasonable
conditions
relevant
federal
interest
project
objectives
thereof
steward
machine
davis
supra
say
tax
valid
imposed
act
congress
laid
upon
condition
state
may
escape
operation
adoption
statute
unrelated
subject
matter
activities
fairly
within
scope
national
policy
power
view
establishment
minimum
drinking
age
sufficiently
related
interstate
highway
construction
justify
conditioning
funds
appropriated
purpose
support
contrary
conclusion
relies
supposed
concession
counsel
south
dakota
state
never
contended
congressional
action
unrelated
national
concern
absence
amendment
brief
petitioner
absence
amendment
however
strong
argument
congress
might
regulate
conditions
liquor
sold
commerce
power
regulates
sale
many
commodities
affect
interstate
commerce
fact
amendment
crucial
state
argument
therefore
amount
concession
condition
imposed
reasonably
related
highway
construction
also
relies
portion
argument
transcript
support
claim
south
dakota
conceded
reasonable
relationship
point
ante
citing
tr
oral
arg
counsel
statements
best
ambiguous
counsel
essentially
said
prepared
argue
reasonable
relationship
question
discussed
length
brief
national
conference
state
legislatures
et
al
amici
curiae
aside
concessions
counsel
asserts
reasonableness
relationship
supposed
purpose
expenditure
safe
interstate
travel
drinking
age
condition
ante
reasons
congress
wishes
roads
builds
may
used
safely
drunken
drivers
threaten
highway
safety
young
people
likely
drive
influence
alcohol
existing
law
case
uniform
national
drinking
age
hardly
needs
saying
however
purpose
deter
drunken
driving
far
stops
teenagers
drinking
even
drive
interstate
highways
teenagers
pose
small
part
drunken
driving
problem
nation
see
cong
rec
remarks
humphrey
percent
highway
fatalities
involving
alcohol
occur
among
whose
ages
exceed
remarks
mcclure
certainly
statistically
use
one
set
statistics
mandatory
drinking
age
raised
least
ibid
remarks
symms
ost
studies
point
drivers
age
worst
offenders
congress
appropriates
money
build
highway
entitled
insist
highway
safe
one
entitled
insist
condition
use
highway
funds
state
impose
change
regulations
areas
state
social
economic
life
attenuated
tangential
relationship
highway
use
safety
indeed
rule
otherwise
congress
effectively
regulate
almost
area
state
social
political
economic
life
theory
use
interstate
transportation
system
somehow
enhanced
example
condition
highway
moneys
upon
moving
state
capital
suppose
might
argue
interstate
transportation
facilitated
locating
local
governments
places
easily
accessible
interstate
highways
conversely
highways
might
become
overburdened
carry
traffic
state
capital
mind
relationship
hardly
attenuated
one
finds
supports
cf
tr
oral
arg
counsel
conceding
condition
grant
upon
adoption
unicameral
legislature
violate
germaneness
requirement
clear
place
draw
line
permissible
impermissible
conditions
federal
grants
line
identified
brief
national
conference
state
legislatures
et
al
amici
curiae
congress
power
spend
general
welfare
power
legislate
delegated
purposes
appropriate
inquiry
whether
spending
requirement
prohibition
condition
grant
whether
regulation
difference
turns
whether
requirement
specifies
way
money
spent
congress
intent
making
grant
effectuated
congress
power
spending
clause
impose
requirements
grant
go
beyond
specifying
money
spent
requirement
specification
condition
regulation
valid
falls
within
one
congress
delegated
regulatory
powers
butler
authority
questionable
insofar
assumes
congress
regulatory
power
farm
production
discussion
spending
power
description
power
breadth
limitations
remain
sound
decision
butler
also
properly
recognizes
gravity
task
appropriately
limiting
spending
power
spending
power
limited
congress
notion
general
welfare
reality
given
vast
financial
resources
federal
government
spending
clause
gives
power
congress
tear
barriers
invade
jurisdiction
become
parliament
whole
people
subject
restrictions
save
butler
supra
course
butler
held
framers
plan
meaning
spending
clause
later
cases
consistent
notion
spending
power
congress
may
condition
grants
ways
fairly
said
related
expenditure
federal
funds
example
oklahoma
csc
upheld
application
hatch
act
member
oklahoma
state
highway
commission
employed
connection
activity
financed
part
loans
grants
federal
agency
condition
appropriately
viewed
condition
relating
federal
moneys
expended
conditions
upheld
may
viewed
independently
justified
regulatory
power
congress
thus
fullilove
klutznick
upheld
condition
federal
grants
money
set
aside
contracts
minority
business
enterprises
found
condition
justified
valid
regulation
commerce
power
fourteenth
amendment
see
also
lau
nichols
upholding
nondiscrimination
provisions
applied
local
schools
receiving
federal
funds
case
however
falls
neither
class
discussed
condition
state
raise
drinking
age
fairly
said
reasonably
related
expenditure
funds
highway
construction
possible
connection
highway
safety
nothing
funds
congress
appropriated
expended
rather
condition
determining
federal
highway
money
shall
expended
regulation
determining
shall
able
drink
liquor
justified
spending
power
possible
sources
congressional
authority
regulating
sale
liquor
commerce
power
comes
mind
view
regulation
age
purchasers
liquor
regulation
price
liquor
may
sold
falls
squarely
within
scope
powers
reserved
amendment
capital
cities
cable
crisp
emphasized
liquor
duffy
dissenting
opinion
history
amendment
strongly
supports
justice
black
view
amendment
intended
return
absolute
control
liquor
trade
federal
government
use
commerce
clause
powers
interfere
manner
exercise
power
conferred
amendment
immense
size
power
government
obscure
fundamental
character
remains
government
enumerated
powers
mcculloch
maryland
wheat
supp
iii
justified
exercise
power
delegated
congress
authorized
constitution
errs
holding
law
land
respectfully
dissent