griffin
oceanic
contractors
argued
april
decided
june
title
obligating
master
owner
vessel
making
coasting
foreign
voyages
pay
seaman
unpaid
wages
within
specified
periods
discharge
provides
master
owner
fails
make
payment
without
sufficient
cause
shall
pay
seaman
sum
equal
two
days
pay
every
day
payment
delayed
beyond
respective
periods
petitioner
injured
working
aboard
respondent
vessel
foreign
waters
brought
suit
jones
act
general
maritime
law
federal
district
respondent
refused
pay
medical
expenses
furnish
transportation
back
addition
damages
petitioner
sought
recover
penalty
wages
respondent
failure
pay
earned
wages
allegedly
due
upon
discharge
found
inter
alia
petitioner
discharged
respondent
employ
day
injury
respondent
failure
pay
petitioner
without
sufficient
cause
assessing
penalty
wages
held
period
penalty
runs
determined
sound
discretion
district
depends
equities
case
determined
appropriate
penalty
period
period
date
discharge
date
petitioner
began
work
another
company
petitioner
appealed
award
damages
inadequate
appeals
affirmed
held
district
courts
discretion
limit
period
wage
penalty
assessed
imposition
penalty
mandatory
day
payment
withheld
violation
pp
words
chosen
congress
given
plain
meaning
leave
room
exercise
discretion
either
deciding
whether
exact
payment
choosing
period
days
payment
calculated
district
found
respondent
refused
pay
petitioner
balance
earned
wages
promptly
discharge
refusal
without
sufficient
cause
nothing
language
vested
discretion
limit
penalty
assessment
period
petitioner
unemployment
pp
type
case
literal
application
statute
thwart
obvious
purpose
section
evident
purpose
secure
prompt
payment
seamen
wages
thus
protect
harsh
consequences
arbitrary
unscrupulous
action
employers
class
peculiarly
exposed
collie
fergusson
although
statute
purpose
remedial
congress
chosen
secure
purpose
use
potentially
punitive
sanctions
designed
deter
negligent
arbitrary
delays
payment
legislative
history
confirms
congress
intended
statute
mean
exactly
plain
language
says
pp
literal
application
case
precluded
asserted
ground
produce
absurd
unjust
result
congress
intended
even
though
penalty
respondent
failure
promptly
pay
wages
computed
basis
period
petitioner
discharge
date
respondent
actually
paid
wages
satisfying
district
judgment
awards
made
intended
merely
compensatory
since
district
found
respondent
refusal
pay
petitioner
following
discharge
without
sufficient
cause
since
made
finding
respondent
continuing
delay
payment
beyond
period
petitioner
unable
work
sufficient
cause
decision
limit
penalty
error
pacific
mail
schmidt
pp
rehnquist
delivered
opinion
burger
brennan
white
marshall
powell
joined
stevens
filed
dissenting
opinion
blackmun
joined
post
robert
chaffin
argued
cause
filed
briefs
petitioner
theodore
goller
argued
cause
filed
brief
respondent
justice
rehnquist
delivered
opinion
case
concerns
application
requires
certain
masters
vessel
owners
pay
seamen
promptly
discharge
authorizes
seamen
recover
double
wages
day
payment
delayed
without
sufficient
cause
question
whether
district
courts
exercise
discretion
may
limit
period
wage
penalty
assessed
whether
imposition
penalty
mandatory
day
payment
withheld
violation
statute
february
petitioner
signed
employment
contract
respondent
new
orleans
agreeing
work
senior
pipeline
welder
board
vessels
operated
respondent
north
sea
contract
specified
petitioner
employment
extend
december
oceanic
pipeline
committal
north
sea
fulfilled
whichever
shall
occur
first
app
contract
also
provided
respondent
pay
transportation
worksite
petitioner
quit
job
prior
termination
date
services
terminated
cause
charged
cost
transportation
back
respondent
reserved
right
withhold
petitioner
first
four
paychecks
cash
deposit
payment
return
transportation
event
become
obligated
payment
march
petitioner
flew
antwerp
belgium
reported
work
respondent
vessel
lay
barge
berthed
antwerp
harbor
repairs
april
petitioner
suffered
injury
working
deck
vessel
readying
sea
two
days
later
underwent
emergency
surgery
antwerp
april
petitioner
discharged
hospital
went
respondent
antwerp
office
spoke
jesse
williams
welding
superintendent
provided
physician
statement
fit
duty
williams
refused
acknowledge
petitioner
injury
denied
respondent
liable
medical
hospital
expenses
maintenance
unearned
wages
williams
also
refused
furnish
transportation
back
continued
retain
earned
wages
deducted
petitioner
first
three
paychecks
purpose
petitioner
returned
home
houston
next
day
expense
examined
physician
determined
able
resume
work
may
may
petitioner
began
working
welder
another
company
operating
north
sea
brought
suit
respondent
jones
act
stat
amended
general
maritime
law
seeking
damages
respondent
failure
pay
maintenance
cure
unearned
wages
repatriation
expenses
value
certain
personal
effects
lost
board
respondent
vessel
petitioner
also
sought
penalty
wages
rev
stat
amended
respondent
failure
pay
earned
wages
allegedly
due
upon
discharge
district
found
petitioner
awarded
damages
totalling
several
findings
made
particularly
relevant
appeal
first
found
petitioner
injury
proximately
caused
unseaworthy
condition
respondent
vessel
app
second
found
petitioner
discharged
respondent
employ
day
injury
termination
employment
caused
solely
injury
third
found
respondent
failure
pay
petitioner
earned
wages
without
sufficient
cause
finally
found
petitioner
exercised
due
diligence
attempting
collect
wages
assessing
penalty
wages
held
period
penalty
runs
determined
sound
discretion
district
depends
equities
case
app
determined
appropriate
period
imposition
penalty
date
discharge
april
date
petitioner
reemployment
may
period
days
applying
statute
computed
penalty
petitioner
appealed
award
damages
inadequate
appeals
fifth
circuit
affirmed
concluded
inter
alia
district
erred
limiting
assessment
penalty
provided
period
beginning
april
ending
may
recognized
statute
required
payment
penalty
day
wages
withheld
date
actually
paid
case
occur
september
respondent
satisfied
judgment
district
see
app
nevertheless
believed
bound
prior
decisions
within
circuit
left
calculation
penalty
period
sound
discretion
district
courts
concluded
district
case
abused
discretion
assessing
penalty
period
petitioner
unemployed
granted
certiorari
resolve
conflict
among
circuits
regarding
proper
application
wage
penalty
statute
reverse
judgment
appeals
issue
ii
language
statute
first
obligates
master
owner
vessel
making
coasting
foreign
voyages
pay
every
seaman
balance
unpaid
wages
within
specified
periods
discharge
provides
every
master
owner
refuses
neglects
make
payment
manner
hereinbefore
mentioned
without
sufficient
cause
shall
pay
seaman
sum
equal
two
days
pay
every
day
payment
delayed
beyond
respective
periods
district
found
respondent
refused
pay
petitioner
balance
earned
wages
promptly
discharge
refusal
without
sufficient
cause
respondent
challenges
neither
findings
although
two
statutory
conditions
satisfied
however
district
obviously
assess
double
wages
every
day
payment
delayed
instead
limited
assessment
period
petitioner
unemployment
nothing
language
statute
vests
courts
discretion
set
limitation
nevertheless
respondent
urges
legislative
purpose
statute
best
served
construing
permit
choice
determining
length
penalty
period
respondent
view
purpose
statute
essentially
remedial
compensatory
thus
interpreted
literally
produce
monetary
award
far
excess
equitable
remedy
punitive
respondent
however
unable
support
view
legislative
purpose
reference
terms
statute
course
persuasive
evidence
purpose
statute
words
legislature
undertook
give
expression
wishes
american
trucking
see
caminetti
nevertheless
rare
cases
literal
application
statute
produce
result
demonstrably
odds
intentions
drafters
intentions
must
controlling
reserved
scope
adopting
restricted
rather
literal
usual
meaning
words
acceptance
meaning
thwart
obvious
purpose
statute
commissioner
brown
quoting
helvering
hammel
however
exceptional
case
recognized
collie
fergusson
evident
purpose
statute
secure
prompt
payment
seamen
wages
thus
protect
harsh
consequences
arbitrary
unscrupulous
action
employers
class
peculiarly
exposed
accomplished
imposition
liability
exclusively
compensatory
designed
prevent
coercive
effect
arbitrary
refusals
pay
wages
induce
prompt
payment
payment
possible
thus
although
sure
purpose
statute
remedial
congress
chosen
secure
purpose
use
potentially
punitive
sanctions
designed
deter
negligent
arbitrary
delays
payment
legislative
history
statute
leaves
little
doubt
understanding
correct
law
owes
origins
act
july
ch
stat
passed
first
congress
although
statute
originally
enacted
gave
every
seaman
right
collect
wages
due
contract
soon
voyage
ended
provide
recovery
additional
sums
encourage
compliance
provision
added
shipping
commissioners
act
ch
stat
provided
payment
sum
exceeding
amount
two
days
pay
days
exceeding
ten
days
payment
delayed
act
obviously
established
ceiling
days
period
penalty
assessed
use
words
exceeding
left
courts
discretion
choose
appropriate
penalty
within
period
congress
amended
law
amended
read
relevant
part
every
master
owner
refuses
neglects
make
payment
manner
hereinbefore
mentioned
without
sufficient
cause
shall
pay
seaman
sum
equal
one
day
pay
every
day
payment
delayed
beyond
respective
periods
act
ch
stat
statute
amended
last
time
increase
severity
penalty
doubling
wages
due
day
payment
earned
wages
delayed
seamen
act
ch
stat
suggestion
committee
reports
floor
debates
congress
intended
reinvest
courts
discretion
removed
act
resort
legislative
history
therefore
merely
confirms
congress
intended
statute
mean
exactly
plain
language
says
iii
respondent
argues
however
literal
construction
statute
case
produce
absurd
unjust
result
congress
intended
district
found
daily
wage
used
computing
penalty
statute
applied
literally
petitioner
receive
twice
amount
day
discharge
september
respondent
satisfied
district
judgment
petitioner
receive
simply
respondent
improperly
withheld
wages
respondent
view
congress
intended
seamen
receive
windfalls
nature
without
regard
equities
case
true
interpretations
statute
produce
absurd
results
avoided
alternative
interpretations
consistent
legislative
purpose
available
see
american
trucking
haggar
helvering
refusing
nullify
statutes
however
hard
unexpected
particular
effect
said
laws
enacted
good
intention
put
test
frequently
surprise
law
maker
turn
mischievous
absurd
otherwise
objectionable
case
remedy
lies
law
making
authority
courts
crooks
harrelson
think
use
language
indicates
purpose
protect
seamen
delayed
payments
wages
imposition
liability
exclusively
compensatory
designed
prevent
coercive
effect
arbitrary
refusals
pay
wages
induce
prompt
payment
payment
possible
collie
fergusson
finally
note
holding
consistent
pacific
mail
schmidt
employer
case
challenged
decision
appeals
apply
wage
penalty
delay
district
judgment
occasioned
employer
appeal
held
facts
case
application
penalty
beyond
date
district
judgment
error
contrary
respondent
assertion
however
holding
reflect
discretionary
tailoring
penalty
equities
case
instead
held
delay
pending
appeal
without
sufficient
cause
required
statute
penalty
attach
explained
earlier
condition
imposition
wage
penalty
finding
delay
payment
without
sufficient
cause
extent
equities
situation
considered
see
collie
fergusson
supra
bear
finding
calculation
penalty
period
finding
made
iv
district
found
respondent
refusal
pay
petitioner
earned
wages
following
discharge
without
sufficient
cause
applied
wage
penalty
period
nonpayment
petitioner
unable
work
made
finding
however
respondent
continuing
delay
payment
beyond
period
sufficient
cause
plain
language
statute
therefore
decision
limit
penalty
period
error
judgment
appeals
affirming
decision
accordingly
reversed
case
remanded
proceedings
consistent
opinion
ordered
footnotes
also
found
defendant
begin
thorough
investigation
plaintiff
claim
september
investigation
made
reasonable
diligence
defendant
failure
pay
maintenance
cure
repatriation
expenses
cost
personal
effects
earned
unearned
wages
plaintiff
constituted
arbitrary
unreasonable
callous
willful
disregard
plaintiff
rights
app
found
daily
wage
rate
used
calculating
penalty
accordance
statute
assessed
penalty
twice
rate
days
penalty
period
courts
appeals
third
ninth
circuits
interpreted
statute
mandate
imposition
penalty
day
wages
paid
leave
room
district
exercise
discretion
swain
isthmian
lines
larkins
hudson
waterways
thomas
ss
santa
mercedes
courts
appeals
first
second
fourth
circuits
adopted
interpretation
followed
fifth
circuit
mavromatis
greek
shipowners
forster
oro
navigation
supp
sdny
southern
cross
firipis
cert
denied
noted
conflict
american
foreign
matise
petitioner
questioned
holdings
appeals
case
respondent
appeal
judgment
district
certiorari
statute
reads
full
master
owner
vessel
making
coasting
voyages
shall
pay
every
seaman
wages
within
two
days
termination
agreement
shipped
time
seaman
discharged
whichever
first
happens
case
vessels
making
foreign
voyages
port
atlantic
port
pacific
vice
versa
within
hours
cargo
discharged
within
four
days
seaman
discharged
whichever
first
happens
cases
seaman
shall
entitled
paid
time
discharge
account
wages
sum
equal
part
balance
due
every
master
owner
refuses
neglects
make
payment
manner
hereinbefore
mentioned
without
sufficient
cause
shall
pay
seaman
sum
equal
two
days
pay
every
day
payment
delayed
beyond
respective
periods
sum
shall
recoverable
wages
claim
made
section
shall
apply
masters
owners
vessel
seamen
entitled
share
profits
cruise
voyage
section
shall
apply
fishing
whaling
vessels
yachts
act
act
provided
basis
revised
statutes
codified
section
read
follows
master
owner
every
vessel
making
voyages
port
atlantic
port
pacific
vice
versa
shall
pay
every
seaman
wages
within
two
days
termination
agreement
time
seaman
discharged
whichever
first
happens
case
vessels
making
foreign
voyages
within
three
days
cargo
delivered
within
five
days
seaman
discharge
whichever
first
happens
cases
seaman
shall
time
discharge
entitled
paid
account
sum
equal
part
balance
due
every
master
owner
neglects
refuses
make
payment
manner
hereinbefore
mentioned
without
sufficient
cause
shall
pay
seaman
sum
exceeding
amount
two
days
pay
days
exceeding
ten
days
payment
delayed
beyond
respective
periods
sum
shall
recoverable
wages
claim
made
section
shall
apply
masters
owners
vessel
seamen
entitled
share
profits
cruise
voyage
act
substantially
identical
legislation
passed
house
previous
congress
favorably
reported
senate
failed
come
vote
end
session
thus
house
report
legislation
enacted
contained
little
reproduction
house
report
previous
congress
relevant
senate
report
also
dates
congress
respondent
assumes
penalty
run
september
since
date
finally
paid
petitioner
brief
respondent
petitioner
hand
apparently
assumes
penalty
period
expired
may
date
district
judgment
brief
petitioner
construction
statute
district
entry
judgment
toll
running
penalty
period
unless
delays
beyond
date
explained
sufficient
cause
see
pacific
mail
schmidt
holding
appeal
taken
reasonable
grounds
penalty
apply
delays
payment
beyond
date
district
decree
entered
since
delays
supported
sufficient
cause
appeals
fourth
circuit
southern
cross
firipis
appeals
third
circuit
swain
isthmian
lines
interpreted
decision
pacific
mail
permit
employer
toll
running
penalty
period
placing
hands
allegedly
unlawfully
withheld
wages
found
employer
strong
reasonable
ground
believing
statute
held
apply
work
seaman
claimed
unpaid
wages
occur
voyage
result
oral
contract
justice
stevens
justice
blackmun
joins
dissenting
final
analysis
question
statutory
construction
requires
judge
decide
legislature
intended
enactment
apply
case
hand
language
statute
usually
sufficient
answer
question
reports
full
cases
legislature
reflected
literal
reading
words
chosen
opinion
case
qualifying
language
supports
much
narrower
construction
adopts
years
statute
recent
amendment
federal
judges
consistently
construed
avoid
absurd
result
sanctions
today
reading
statute
consistent
specific
purposes
achieved
amendments
well
meaning
statute
award
unearned
wages
first
authorized
april
petitioner
welder
suffered
temporarily
disabling
injury
aboard
respondent
vessel
april
petitioner
met
respondent
welding
superintendent
refused
acknowledge
respondent
responsible
injury
also
refused
pay
petitioner
earned
wages
petitioner
fully
recovered
injury
may
two
days
later
obtained
comparable
work
another
employer
filed
action
february
settled
respondent
responsible
petitioner
injury
respondent
wrongfully
refused
pay
april
question
statutory
construction
us
sum
shall
recoverable
wages
compensate
petitioner
respondent
refusal
pay
april
district
computed
sum
doubling
daily
wage
multiplying
amount
number
days
injury
april
petitioner
reemployment
may
district
award
thus
amounted
holds
sum
recoverable
wages
amounts
least
ii
pertinent
part
provides
follows
every
master
owner
refuses
neglects
make
payment
seaman
earned
wages
within
four
days
seaman
discharge
without
sufficient
cause
shall
pay
seaman
sum
equal
two
days
pay
every
day
payment
delayed
beyond
period
sum
shall
recoverable
wages
claim
made
emphasis
added
fixing
amount
award
double
wages
district
case
may
reasoned
respondent
sufficient
cause
delay
paying
earned
wages
petitioner
obtained
employment
another
shipmaster
sufficient
cause
failure
make
payment
time
although
reasoning
conflicts
literal
reading
perfectly
consistent
contemporary
construction
statute
pacific
mail
schmidt
teaching
justice
holmes
opinion
case
wrongful
character
initial
refusal
pay
mean
subsequent
delay
payment
also
without
sufficient
cause
within
meaning
statute
controversy
pacific
mail
arose
statute
provided
sum
recoverable
wages
measured
one
day
pay
rather
double
amount
day
wages
withheld
without
sufficient
cause
statute
otherwise
exactly
today
seaman
discharged
october
withheld
wages
believed
responsible
loss
silverware
filed
action
october
november
obtained
judgment
wages
additional
sum
representing
sum
recoverable
wages
period
october
november
district
decree
established
proposition
vessel
owner
defenses
constitute
sufficient
cause
refusing
pay
wages
requiring
seaman
sue
recover
vessel
owner
prosecuted
unsuccessful
appeal
appeals
affirmed
decision
district
also
added
additional
recovery
daily
wages
period
entry
original
judgment
november
actual
payment
disputed
wages
appeals
thus
read
statute
literally
ordered
result
district
finding
seemed
dictate
however
set
aside
additional
recovery
reaching
conclusion
reconciled
wooden
literal
reading
statute
concurrent
findings
district
appeals
established
refusal
make
wage
payment
due
without
sufficient
cause
justice
holmes
brethren
accepted
finding
purposes
decision
reasoned
sufficient
cause
owner
decision
appeal
refusal
pay
appeal
pending
curious
character
conclusion
reasons
insufficient
justify
refusal
pay
trial
decision
somehow
became
sufficient
justify
subsequent
refusal
pay
significant
point
justice
holmes
opinion
case
primarily
significant
holding
squared
literal
reading
statute
even
though
initial
refusal
without
sufficient
cause
statutory
wages
necessarily
recoverable
entire
period
payment
made
either
seaman
stakeholder
subsequent
event
even
though
expressly
mentioned
statute
may
foreshorten
recovery
period
pacific
mail
subsequent
event
vessel
owner
decision
appeal
finding
event
provided
sufficient
cause
delay
november
made
sua
sponte
case
subsequent
event
reemployment
petitioner
comparable
job
may
finding
event
coupled
failure
make
additional
demand
almost
two
years
thereafter
sufficient
cause
delay
may
made
district
true
judge
expressly
frame
decision
terms
actual
decision
fits
precisely
mold
established
pacific
mail
cases
give
flexible
reading
sufficient
cause
language
statute
differ
respect
nature
subsequent
event
respect
departure
statutory
text
second
case
construed
collie
fergusson
also
focused
meaning
phrase
without
sufficient
cause
case
unpaid
seamen
claimed
financial
necessities
owner
constitute
sufficient
cause
delay
wage
payments
contention
surely
consistent
plain
language
statute
nevertheless
denied
recovery
construing
statute
implicitly
containing
requirement
refusal
sense
arbitrary
wilful
least
failure
attributable
impossibility
payment
adopted
nonliteral
construction
statute
recognized
significance
provision
seaman
claim
shall
recoverable
wages
claim
made
see
proceeding
arising
insolvency
vessel
owner
provision
accords
type
claim
priority
general
creditors
various
lienors
stronger
equitable
claims
limited
assets
construction
words
without
sufficient
cause
narrow
protection
statute
consistent
intent
congress
even
though
involved
rather
flexible
reading
text
statute
third
occasion
interpret
mccrea
construed
statute
narrowly
time
taking
literal
approach
case
seaman
citing
specific
sections
federal
legislation
demanded
shipmaster
discharge
earned
wages
benefits
master
unfamiliar
cited
sections
asked
seaman
meet
noon
next
day
informed
discussion
demands
seaman
missed
appointment
left
country
without
contacting
master
return
seaman
filed
action
claimed
entitlement
inter
alia
earned
wages
double
wages
delay
payment
district
affirmed
appeals
held
owner
ship
immune
provision
double
wages
constituted
penalty
granted
seaman
petition
certiorari
avoided
decision
sovereign
immunity
question
holding
sufficient
cause
failure
shipmaster
make
wage
payment
within
four
days
seaman
discharge
rejected
seaman
rather
reasonable
argument
even
shipmaster
cause
withhold
payment
four
days
sufficient
cause
continued
refusal
seaman
filed
action
formally
made
claim
earned
wages
without
citing
pacific
mail
held
master
failure
pay
earned
wages
time
specified
statute
justified
sufficient
cause
fact
later
refused
pay
pursuant
proper
demand
give
rise
statutory
liability
even
though
sufficient
cause
subsequent
refusal
early
interpretations
dispel
notion
statute
means
exactly
says
construed
statute
effect
purpose
isbrandtsen
johnson
early
cases
demonstrate
purpose
statute
always
require
award
double
wages
amount
statute
literally
specifies
flexibility
also
characterized
applications
statute
rendered
lower
federal
courts
decades
courts
consistently
concluded
congress
intended
allow
judicial
discretion
play
part
determining
amount
recovery
whether
decisions
entirely
consistent
meaning
grammarian
might
placed
statute
less
significant
fact
entirely
consistent
decisions
one
another
fact
holdings
must
come
attention
congress
contrary
reading
statute
adopted
third
circuit
swain
isthmian
lines
another
eight
years
case
followed
another
circuit
deny
wisdom
rule
construction
mandates
close
adherence
literal
statutory
text
also
true
consistent
course
judicial
construction
become
much
part
statute
words
inserted
legislature
construction
consistently
followed
federal
judiciary
presumably
acceptable
congress
find
persuasive
literal
reading
places
entire
reliance
moreover
since
result
construction
produces
case
absurd
palpably
unjust
one
cases
exercise
judgment
dictates
departure
literal
text
order
faithful
legislative
iii
construction
permitting
district
exercise
discretion
tailoring
award
particular
equities
case
consistent
legislative
history
new
literal
approach
statute
congress
authorized
recovery
additional
wages
seamen
paid
within
five
days
discharge
used
word
shall
make
clear
recovery
must
awarded
allowed
district
courts
limited
discretion
setting
amount
recovery
judge
discretion
amount
limited
two
ways
statutory
wage
rate
double
amount
seaman
daily
wage
period
statutory
wage
awarded
exceed
days
subsequent
amendments
statute
remove
requirement
recovery
shall
awarded
modify
limits
judge
discretion
respect
wage
rate
congress
first
specified
equal
daily
rate
rather
double
daily
rate
later
specified
rate
double
rate
respect
period
statutory
wage
payable
amendment
simply
removed
limit
amendment
subject
two
different
interpretations
one
represent
rather
unremarkable
change
drastic
dramatic
unremarkable
change
amount
nothing
removal
narrow
limit
scope
judge
discretion
word
shall
continue
nothing
require
recovery
amount
fixed
judge
recognition
reality
seamen
might
stranded
days
recovery
period
extend
beyond
days
sort
unremarkable
change
consistent
purpose
statute
well
legislative
history
fails
make
comment
significance
justice
rehnquist
perceptively
observed
another
context
fact
dog
bark
significant
construction
amendment
however
drastic
dramatic
instead
effecting
modest
enlargement
judge
discretion
justice
cases
construction
effects
complete
prohibition
judicial
discretion
instead
permitting
recoveries
period
somewhat
longer
days
amendment
construed
command
even
unresolved
dispute
persists
two
three
years
without
special
hardship
seaman
automatic
recovery
must
ordered
entire
period
regardless
equitable
considerations
may
arise
shipmaster
initial
mistake
made
major
change
potential
amount
statutory
recovery
character
judge
authority
normally
explained
committee
reports
debates
intended
iv
ironic
seven
justices
today
transfixed
literal
reading
days
ago
blithely
ignored
text
tax
injunction
act
order
reach
conclusion
federal
jurisdiction
entertain
suit
declaratory
judgment
secretary
labor
determine
whether
federal
statute
violates
federal
constitution
california
grace
brethren
church
inconsistency
approach
task
statutory
construction
two
cases
less
troublesome
however
failure
case
consider
whether
conclusion
reasonably
thought
represent
congress
persuaded
amendment
removing
limit
scope
trial
judge
discretion
intended
read
command
award
seaman
paid
wages
due
respectfully
dissent
familiar
rule
thing
may
within
letter
statute
yet
within
statute
within
spirit
within
intention
makers
often
asserted
reports
full
cases
illustrating
application
substitution
judge
legislator
frequently
words
general
meaning
used
statute
words
broad
enough
include
act
question
yet
consideration
whole
legislation
circumstances
surrounding
enactment
absurd
results
follow
giving
broad
meaning
words
makes
unreasonable
believe
legislator
intended
include
particular
act
holy
trinity
church
statute
quoted
full
ante
appeals
held
award
constitute
abuse
discretion
figure
computed
reference
period
april
date
discharge
may
date
judgment
see
ante
omits
italicized
clause
statute
quotes
statute
text
opinion
ante
wage
claims
unlike
penalties
consistently
accorded
high
priority
insolvency
proceedings
employers
seems
clause
pertinent
task
discerning
intent
congress
authorizing
award
double
wages
see
also
infra
petition
rehearing
pointing
adopted
interpretation
statute
urged
briefs
opinions
lower
courts
seaman
argued
according
grammatical
natural
unambiguous
meaning
conveyed
words
section
congress
limited
running
penalties
sufficient
cause
original
earned
wages
sufficient
cause
operating
prevent
penalties
ever
beginning
accrue
penalties
begin
run
nothing
short
actual
payment
tender
suffice
prevent
continuous
accrual
per
diem
penalties
pet
rehearing
petitioner
argues
literal
application
yield
harsh
results
shipmaster
may
toll
period
delay
tendering
disputed
wage
claim
registry
brief
petitioner
petitioner
words
master
may
make
constructive
payment
wages
seems
accept
argument
see
ante
neither
petitioner
seems
recognize
acceptance
minimal
tolling
rule
conflicts
literal
reading
statute
tender
wages
constructive
payment
wages
added
reasonable
gloss
statute
today
read
pacific
mail
requiring
finding
made
expressly
either
follow
justice
holmes
lead
making
comparable
finding
remand
district
additional
findings
issue
district
finding
arbitrariness
case
view
holding
collie
necessary
penalty
wage
recovered
must
read
context
actual
award
clearly
erroneous
find
refusal
pay
petitioner
arbitrary
unemployed
surely
equally
arbitrary
ensuing
period
employed
competitor
renew
demand
see
mystic
stromland
district
limiting
right
recovery
days
libel
filed
effect
placed
limitation
amount
recovery
statute
objection
think
rehearing
denied
cert
denied
mavromatis
greek
shipowners
language
given
somewhat
free
reading
accord
courts
considerable
margin
discretion
adjusting
duration
penalty
equities
particular
case
prindes
african
pilgrim
period
penalty
accumulates
determined
equities
particular
case
southern
cross
firipis
regard
liability
double
pay
doctrine
developed
mccrea
case
continued
present
time
district
measure
discretion
application
equitable
principles
determining
number
days
double
wages
assessed
cert
denied
caribbean
federation
lines
dahl
time
penalty
provision
runs
rests
within
sound
discretion
depends
upon
equities
case
cert
denied
mcconville
florida
towing
wide
equitable
discretion
fixing
time
penalty
provision
runs
chester
md
spite
seeming
rigidity
statute
still
left
courts
certain
discretionary
power
limit
penalties
victoria
supp
sdny
spite
seeming
rigidity
statute
still
discretionary
power
limit
penalties
rev
grounds
forster
oro
navigation
supp
sdny
number
days
defendant
must
pay
double
wages
rests
discretion
depends
equities
particular
case
aff
samad
etivebank
supp
ed
number
days
respondents
must
pay
double
wages
rests
discretion
depends
upon
equities
particular
case
spero
steamship
argodon
supp
ed
well
settled
number
days
respondents
must
pay
double
wages
rests
discretion
depends
upon
equities
particular
case
kontos
ss
sophie
supp
ed
although
penalty
applicable
duration
seems
committed
discretion
trial
judge
tailor
equities
particular
case
ventiadis
thibodeaux
supp
sd
tex
time
penalty
provision
runs
rests
within
sound
discretion
depends
upon
equities
case
see
also
swanson
torry
lake
galewood
md
aff
cert
denied
see
southern
cross
firipis
supra
see
despite
rather
precise
statutory
directive
cases
uncovered
question
whether
section
statute
may
still
read
measure
judicial
discretion
supposed
equitable
considerations
present
considered
found
proper
balancing
statutory
language
judicial
sense
equities
case
see
escobar
ss
washington
trader
vacated
remanded
grounds
sub
nom
american
trading
transportation
escobar
see
recently
weinberger
stevens
dissenting
based
interpretation
sufficient
cause
collie
fergusson
part
upon
conclusion
reached
practical
unanimity
lower
federal
courts
several
occasions
within
last
years
construe
statutes
conflicts
reasonable
intention
literal
meaning
occurred
refused
nullify
statutes
however
hard
unexpected
particular
effect
unambiguous
language
called
logical
sensible
result
course
properly
condemned
judicial
legislation
however
construe
statutes
avoid
results
glaringly
absurd
long
judicial
function
language
susceptible
construction
preserves
usefulness
section
judicial
duty
rests
upon
give
expression
intendment
law
armstrong
paint
varnish
works
footnotes
omitted
version
provided
pertinent
part
master
owner
neglects
refuses
make
payment
seaman
earned
wages
within
five
days
seaman
discharge
without
sufficient
cause
shall
pay
seaman
sum
exceeding
amount
two
days
pay
days
exceeding
ten
days
payment
delayed
beyond
period
sum
shall
recoverable
wages
claim
made
act
june
ch
stat
version
provided
pertinent
part
every
master
owner
refuses
neglects
make
payment
seaman
earned
wages
within
four
days
seaman
discharge
without
sufficient
cause
shall
pay
seaman
sum
equal
one
day
pay
every
day
payment
delayed
beyond
period
sum
shall
recoverable
wages
claim
made
act
stat
amendment
substituted
two
days
pay
one
day
pay
see
act
mar
stat
justice
cardozo
member
new
york
appeals
explained
purpose
statute
purpose
least
predominant
one
punishment
master
owner
compensation
seaman
delay
means
loss
opportunity
ship
upon
another
vessel
means
hardship
term
waiting
sufferer
often
improvident
stranded
far
home
fairness
recover
amount
due
wages
earned
calvin
huntley
mass
cox
lykes
brothers
district
award
case
tolling
period
computing
double
wages
date
petitioner
obtained
employment
another
seagoing
vessel
also
perfectly
consistent
statutory
purpose
harrison
ppg
industries
dissenting
opinion
cf
conan
doyle
silver
blaze
complete
sherlock
holmes
house
report
description
amendment
increases
amount
balance
wages
due
seaman
entitled
immediately
upon
discharge
general
provides
prompter
payment
wages
seamen
noteworthy
first
change
described
respecting
part
seaman
wages
entitled
time
discharge
every
case
rather
trivial
see
full
text
statute
ante
description
provision
prompter
payment
wages
likely
refers
amendment
time
period
shipmaster
pay
seaman
full
wages
order
avoid
provision
cases
seamen
vessels
making
foreign
voyages
time
period
changed
five
days
see
supra
four
days
see
supra