keeney
argued
january
decided
may
collateral
state
proceedings
respondent
cuban
immigrant
little
education
almost
knowledge
english
alleged
inter
alia
plea
nolo
contendere
manslaughter
knowing
intelligent
therefore
invalid
translator
translated
accurately
completely
mens
rea
element
crime
question
state
dismissed
petition
hearing
oregon
appeals
affirmed
state
denied
review
federal
district
denied
respondent
habeas
corpus
relief
however
appeals
held
entitled
federal
evidentiary
hearing
question
whether
mens
rea
element
crime
properly
explained
since
record
disclosed
material
facts
concerning
translation
adequately
developed
state
hearing
see
townsend
sain
since
postconviction
counsel
negligent
failure
develop
facts
constitute
deliberate
bypass
orderly
procedure
state
courts
see
fay
noia
held
standard
rather
fay
deliberate
bypass
standard
correct
standard
excusing
habeas
petitioner
failure
develop
material
fact
state
proceedings
townsend
holding
fay
standard
applicable
case
like
must
overruled
light
recent
decisions
involving
like
fay
state
procedural
default
rejected
deliberate
bypass
standard
favor
standard
cause
prejudice
see
wainwright
sykes
coleman
thompson
irrational
distinguish
failing
properly
assert
federal
claim
state
failing
state
properly
develop
claim
apply
latter
remnant
decision
longer
upheld
regard
former
moreover
concerns
finality
comity
judicial
economy
channeling
resolution
claims
appropriate
forum
motivated
rejection
fay
standard
state
procedural
default
cases
equally
applicable
case
finally
applying
standard
also
advances
uniformity
habeas
corpus
law
thus
respondent
entitled
federal
evidentiary
hearing
show
cause
failure
develop
facts
state
proceedings
actual
prejudice
resulting
failure
show
fundamental
miscarriage
justice
result
failure
hold
hearing
see
mccleskey
zant
pp
reversed
remanded
white
delivered
opinion
rehnquist
scalia
souter
thomas
joined
filed
dissenting
opinion
blackmun
stevens
kennedy
joined
post
kennedy
filed
dissenting
opinion
post
jack
landau
deputy
attorney
general
oregon
argued
cause
petitioner
briefs
charles
crookham
attorney
general
dave
frohnmayer
former
attorney
general
virginia
linder
solicitor
general
brenda
peterson
rives
kistler
assistant
attorneys
general
steven
wax
argued
cause
filed
brief
respondent
briefs
amici
curiae
urging
reversal
filed
state
california
et
al
daniel
lungren
attorney
general
california
george
williamson
chief
assistant
attorney
general
john
sugiyama
senior
assistant
attorney
general
dane
gillette
joan
killeen
haller
deputy
attorneys
general
attorneys
general
respective
follows
james
evans
alabama
grant
woods
arizona
larry
echohawk
idaho
marc
racicot
montana
frankie
sue
del
papa
nevada
robert
del
tufo
new
jersey
lacy
thornburg
north
carolina
ernest
preate
pennsylvania
charles
burson
tennessee
kenneth
eikenberry
washington
criminal
justice
legal
foundation
kent
scheidegger
justice
white
delivered
opinion
respondent
cuban
immigrant
little
education
almost
knowledge
english
charged
murder
arising
stabbing
death
man
allegedly
attempted
intervene
confrontation
respondent
girlfriend
bar
respondent
provided
defense
attorney
interpreter
attorney
recommended
respondent
plead
nolo
contendere
manslaughter
respondent
signed
plea
form
explained
english
rights
waiving
entering
plea
state
held
plea
hearing
petitioner
represented
counsel
interpreter
judge
asked
attorney
interpreter
explained
respondent
rights
plea
form
consequences
plea
responded
affirmative
judge
explained
respondent
english
rights
waive
plea
asked
interpreter
translate
respondent
indicated
understood
rights
still
wished
plead
nolo
contendere
judge
accepted
plea
later
respondent
brought
collateral
attack
plea
state
proceeding
alleged
plea
knowing
intelligent
therefore
invalid
translator
translated
accurately
completely
mens
rea
element
manslaughter
also
contended
understand
purposes
plea
form
plea
hearing
contended
know
pleading
contest
manslaughter
rather
thought
agreeing
tried
manslaughter
hearing
state
dismissed
respondent
petition
finding
respondent
properly
served
trial
interpreter
interpreter
correctly
fully
accurately
translated
communications
respondent
attorney
app
state
appeals
affirmed
state
denied
review
respondent
entered
federal
district
seeking
writ
habeas
corpus
respondent
contended
material
facts
concerning
translation
adequately
developed
state
hearing
implicating
fifth
circumstance
townsend
sain
sought
federal
evidentiary
hearing
whether
nolo
contendere
plea
unconstitutional
district
found
failure
develop
critical
facts
relevant
federal
claim
attributable
inexcusable
neglect
evidentiary
hearing
required
app
pet
cert
respondent
appealed
appeals
ninth
circuit
recognized
alleged
failure
translate
mens
rea
element
manslaughter
proved
basis
overturning
respondent
plea
determined
material
facts
adequately
developed
state
postconviction
apparently
due
negligence
postconviction
counsel
held
townsend
sain
supra
fay
noia
required
evidentiary
hearing
district
unless
respondent
deliberately
bypassed
orderly
procedure
state
courts
counsel
negligent
failure
develop
facts
constitute
deliberate
bypass
appeals
ruled
respondent
entitled
evidentiary
hearing
question
whether
mens
rea
element
manslaughter
properly
explained
granted
certiorari
decide
whether
deliberate
bypass
standard
correct
standard
excusing
habeas
petitioner
failure
develop
material
fact
state
proceedings
reverse
holding
townsend
sain
fay
noia
deliberate
bypass
standard
applicable
case
like
reversed
quite
understandable
appeals
applied
standard
case
however
light
recent
decisions
townsend
holding
respect
must
overruled
fay
noia
case
habeas
petitioner
taken
advantage
state
remedies
failing
appeal
procedural
default
case
since
time
however
rejected
deliberate
bypass
standard
state
procedural
default
cases
applied
instead
standard
cause
prejudice
francis
henderson
acknowledged
federal
power
entertain
application
habeas
even
claim
procedurally
waived
state
proceedings
nonetheless
examined
appropriateness
exercise
power
recognized
fay
considerations
comity
concerns
orderly
administration
criminal
justice
may
circumstances
require
federal
forgo
exercise
habeas
corpus
power
held
federal
habeas
petitioner
required
show
cause
procedural
default
well
actual
prejudice
wainwright
sykes
rejected
application
fay
standard
knowing
waiver
deliberate
bypass
excuse
petitioner
failure
comply
state
contemporaneous
objection
rule
stating
state
rule
deserved
respect
fay
standard
accorded
observed
procedural
rules
contribute
state
trial
proceedings
thoroughly
desirable
applied
standard
petitioner
failure
object
trial
limited
fay
facts
consistently
reaffirmed
standard
embodies
correct
accommodation
competing
concerns
implicated
federal
habeas
power
reed
ross
engle
isaac
mccleskey
zant
held
standard
used
excuse
state
procedural
defaults
applied
habeas
corpus
cases
abuse
writ
claimed
government
conclusion
rested
fact
two
doctrines
similar
purpose
design
implicate
similar
concerns
writ
strikes
finality
state
criminal
conviction
matter
particular
importance
federal
system
citing
murray
carrier
federal
habeas
litigation
also
places
heavy
burden
scarce
judicial
resources
may
give
litigants
incentives
withhold
claims
manipulative
purposes
may
create
disincentives
present
claims
evidence
fresh
see
also
reed
ross
supra
wainwright
supra
addressing
issue
state
procedural
default
coleman
thompson
described
fay
based
conception
relations
undervalued
importance
state
procedural
rules
went
hold
standard
applicable
failure
raise
particular
claim
apply
well
failure
appeal
ibid
state
interests
channeling
resolution
claims
appropriate
forum
finality
opportunity
correct
errors
implicated
whether
prisoner
defaults
one
claim
therefore
applied
standard
uniformly
state
procedural
defaults
eliminating
irrational
distinction
fay
subsequent
cases
light
decisions
similarly
irrational
distinguish
failing
properly
assert
federal
claim
state
failing
state
properly
develop
claim
apply
latter
remnant
decision
longer
upheld
regard
former
concerns
motivated
rejection
deliberate
bypass
standard
wainwright
coleman
cases
equally
applicable
case
cases
state
procedural
default
application
standard
excuse
state
prisoner
failure
develop
material
facts
state
appropriately
accommodate
concerns
finality
comity
judicial
economy
channeling
resolution
claims
appropriate
forum
applying
standard
cases
like
obviously
contribute
finality
convictions
requiring
federal
evidentiary
hearing
solely
basis
habeas
petitioner
negligent
failure
develop
facts
proceedings
dramatically
increases
opportunities
relitigate
conviction
similarly
encouraging
full
factual
development
state
claim
state
courts
committed
constitutional
error
advances
comity
allowing
coordinate
jurisdiction
correct
errors
first
instance
reduces
inevitable
friction
results
federal
habeas
overturn
either
factual
legal
conclusions
reached
state
system
sumner
mata
also
ensuring
full
factual
development
takes
place
earlier
state
proceedings
standard
plainly
serves
interest
judicial
economy
hardly
good
use
scarce
judicial
resources
duplicate
factfinding
federal
merely
petitioner
negligently
failed
take
advantage
opportunities
state
proceedings
furthermore
ensuring
full
factual
development
claim
takes
place
state
channels
resolution
claim
appropriate
forum
state
appropriate
forum
resolution
factual
issues
first
instance
creating
incentives
deferral
factfinding
later
federal
proceedings
degrade
accuracy
efficiency
judicial
proceedings
fully
consistent
gives
meaning
requirement
exhaustion
long
held
state
prisoners
must
exhaust
state
remedies
obtaining
federal
habeas
relief
ex
parte
royall
requirement
state
prisoners
exhaust
state
remedies
writ
habeas
corpus
granted
federal
incorporated
federal
habeas
statute
exhaustion
means
notice
requiring
exhaustion
federal
claim
state
congress
surely
meant
exhaustion
serious
meaningful
purpose
exhaustion
create
procedural
hurdle
path
federal
habeas
channel
claims
appropriate
forum
meritorious
claims
may
vindicated
unfounded
litigation
obviated
resort
federal
comity
concerns
dictate
requirement
exhaustion
satisfied
mere
statement
federal
claim
state
state
must
afford
petitioner
full
fair
hearing
federal
claim
must
petitioner
afford
state
full
fair
opportunity
address
resolve
claim
merits
cf
picard
connor
finally
worth
noting
applying
standard
case
also
advances
uniformity
law
habeas
corpus
good
reason
maintain
one
area
habeas
law
standard
rejected
area
principally
enunciated
little
said
holding
habeas
petitioner
one
standard
failing
bring
claim
state
excusing
petitioner
another
lower
standard
failing
develop
factual
basis
claim
forum
different
rule
mean
habeas
petitioner
excused
negligent
failure
object
introduction
prosecution
evidence
nonetheless
excused
negligent
failure
introduce
evidence
support
constitutional
claim
respondent
entitled
evidentiary
hearing
show
cause
failure
develop
facts
state
proceedings
actual
prejudice
resulting
failure
also
adopt
narrow
exception
requirement
habeas
petitioner
failure
develop
claim
state
proceedings
excused
hearing
mandated
show
fundamental
miscarriage
justice
result
failure
hold
federal
evidentiary
hearing
cf
mccleskey
zant
murray
carrier
state
concedes
remand
district
appropriate
order
afford
respondent
opportunity
bring
forward
evidence
establishing
cause
prejudice
brief
petitioner
agree
respondent
opportunity
accordingly
decision
appeals
reversed
cause
remanded
district
proceedings
consistent
opinion
ordered
footnotes
justice
asserts
townsend
sain
insofar
relevant
case
merely
reflected
existing
law
claim
thus
seems
general
rule
stated
townsend
governing
evidentiary
hearing
must
granted
federal
habeas
corpus
petitioner
well
six
criteria
particularizing
general
pronouncement
reflected
found
prior
holdings
doubtful
claim
surely
time
think
case
pointedly
observed
prior
cases
settled
aspects
hearing
problem
habeas
proceedings
lower
federal
courts
reached
widely
divergent
irreconcilable
results
dealing
hearing
issues
hence
deemed
advisable
give
guidance
lower
courts
also
expressly
stated
rules
announcing
must
considered
supersede
extent
inconsistencies
opinions
brown
allen
necessary
brown
inconsistent
holding
townsend
regarding
habeas
petitioners
failed
adequately
develop
federal
claims
state
proceedings
see
brown
allen
federal
may
deny
writ
without
rehearing
facts
legality
detention
determined
facts
presented
state
emphasis
added
writ
refused
without
federal
satisfied
record
state
process
given
fair
consideration
issues
offered
evidence
emphasis
added
unequivocally
acknowledged
townsend
substantially
changed
availability
evidentiary
hearings
federal
habeas
proceedings
see
smith
yeager
per
curiam
surprising
none
cases
cited
justice
remotely
support
townsend
requirement
hearing
case
material
facts
adequately
developed
state
hearing
due
petitioner
neglect
finally
undeniable
fay
noia
deliberate
bypass
standard
overruled
prior
procedural
default
cases
less
true
townsend
adoption
standard
definition
inexcusable
neglect
made
new
law
justice
puts
aside
overruling
fay
noia
standard
procedural
default
cases
ground
cases
standard
acceptable
precondition
reaching
merits
habeas
petitioner
claim
insists
applying
standard
cases
petitioner
defaulted
development
claim
subject
characterization
reasons
stated
text
disagree
moreover
justice
position
considerably
weakened
concession
standard
properly
applied
factually
undeveloped
claim
exhausted
first
asserted
federally
second
later
habeas
petition
contrary
justice
view
post
think
clear
townsend
thought
standard
used
deny
hearing
procedural
default
case
used
deny
hearing
cases
described
fifth
circumstance
difficult
conceive
reason
borrowing
deliberate
bypass
standard
fay
noia
particularly
dissent
seems
say
post
townsend
relied
repeat
analysis
found
fay
noia
yet
dissent
insists
rejection
fay
noia
analysis
later
cases
impact
case
us
application
writ
habeas
corpus
shall
granted
unless
appears
applicant
exhausted
remedies
available
courts
state
asserted
justice
adopting
congress
assumed
continuing
validity
aspects
townsend
including
requirement
hearing
fifth
circumstance
cases
absent
deliberate
bypass
several
reasons
disagree
first
evident
codify
townsend
specifications
hearing
required
townsend
described
categories
cases
evidentiary
hearings
required
section
however
purport
govern
question
hearings
required
rather
lists
exceptions
normal
presumption
correctness
findings
deals
burden
proof
hearings
held
two
issues
distinct
statute
indicates
assumption
presence
absence
statutory
exceptions
determine
whether
hearing
held
second
extent
even
considered
issue
default
congress
sensibly
read
townsend
holding
federal
habeas
corpus
standard
cases
default
townsend
fifth
circumstance
cases
procedural
default
third
mention
recognize
exception
inexcusable
neglect
let
alone
reflect
specific
standard
deliberate
bypass
face
silence
assumed
judicially
created
standard
equitable
default
must
deliberate
bypass
standard
borrowed
townsend
decision
since
repudiated
agree
justice
holding
claim
invoking
fifth
circumstance
townsend
unavailing
cause
asserted
attorney
error
murray
carrier
coleman
thompson
dictate
much
intended
effect
cases
make
circumstance
dead
letter
cause
may
shown
reasons
attorney
error
noted
murray
procedural
default
case
objective
factors
external
defense
may
impede
counsel
efforts
comply
went
say
without
attempting
exhaustive
catalog
objective
impediments
compliance
procedural
rule
note
showing
factual
legal
basis
claim
reasonably
available
counsel
see
reed
ross
interference
officials
brown
allen
made
compliance
impracticable
constitute
cause
standard
much
may
said
cases
petitioner
defaulted
development
claim
extent
relevant
decision
case
justice
argument
many
forms
cause
fall
townsend
circumstances
persuasive
example
third
sixth
circumstances
townsend
speak
denial
full
fair
hearing
however
situation
facts
inadequately
developed
interference
officials
fall
naturally
fifth
circumstance
justice
justice
blackmun
justice
stevens
justice
kennedy
join
dissenting
guise
overruling
remnant
decision
ante
achieving
uniformity
law
ante
changed
law
habeas
corpus
fundamental
way
effectively
overruling
cases
decided
long
townsend
sain
think
change
supported
line
recent
procedural
default
cases
upon
relies
view
balance
state
federal
interests
regarding
whether
federal
consider
claim
raised
habeas
simply
lifted
transposed
different
question
whether
consider
claim
hold
evidentiary
hearing
moreover
think
decision
reconciled
statute
congress
enacted
three
years
townsend
jose
habeas
petition
stated
speak
english
pleaded
nolo
contendere
manslaughter
without
understanding
manslaughter
means
app
assertion
true
conviction
unconstitutionally
obtained
see
henderson
morgan
entitled
writ
habeas
corpus
despite
attempt
characterize
allegation
technical
quibble
translator
translated
accurately
completely
mens
rea
element
manslaughter
ante
much
dispute
alleged
fact
true
entitle
relief
seeks
initially
properly
challenged
voluntariness
plea
petition
postconviction
relief
state
held
hearing
found
etitioner
plea
guilty
knowingly
voluntarily
entered
app
yet
record
postconviction
hearing
hardly
inspires
confidence
accuracy
determination
witness
testify
attorney
ask
whether
interpreter
translated
manslaughter
counsel
instead
introduced
deposition
testimony
interpreter
admitted
translated
manslaughter
less
murder
witnesses
capable
assessing
interpreter
performance
called
attorney
instead
tried
direct
attention
various
sections
interpreter
deposition
attempted
point
interpreter
erred
prosecutor
objected
discussion
ground
counsel
qualified
expert
witness
presentation
issue
quickly
disintegrated
state
relevant
evidence
determined
actually
understood
charge
pleading
contrary
impression
conveyed
opinion
question
whether
federal
defer
sort
dubious
factfinding
addressing
habeas
corpus
petition
one
long
history
behind
history
begin
townsend
sain
ii
availability
scope
habeas
corpus
changed
writ
long
history
one
thing
remained
constant
habeas
corpus
appellate
proceeding
rather
original
civil
action
federal
see
browder
director
dept
corrections
settled
hundred
years
ago
prosecution
criminal
defendant
criminal
prosecution
writ
habeas
corpus
proceeding
prosecution
contrary
new
suit
brought
enforce
civil
right
ex
parte
tom
tong
possible
doubt
point
removed
statutory
procedure
congress
provided
disposition
habeas
corpus
petitions
procedure
including
nonappellate
functions
allegation
facts
taking
depositions
propounding
interrogatories
introduction
documentary
evidence
course
determination
facts
evidentiary
hearings
sure
habeas
corpus
peculiar
set
hurdles
petitioner
must
clear
claim
properly
presented
district
petitioner
must
general
exhaust
available
state
remedies
avoid
procedural
default
coleman
thompson
abuse
writ
mccleskey
zant
seek
retroactive
application
new
rule
law
teague
lane
much
history
hurdles
even
higher
see
ex
parte
watkins
pet
habeas
corpus
available
challenge
jurisdiction
trial
surmounted
claim
properly
district
habeas
petitioner
like
civil
litigant
right
hearing
one
necessary
prove
facts
supporting
claim
see
hawk
olson
holiday
johnston
walker
johnston
moore
dempsey
thus
observed
townsend
sain
opportunity
redress
presupposes
opportunity
heard
argue
present
evidence
saying
nothing
new
merely
restating
long
understanding
method
contested
factual
issues
raised
habeas
resolved
habeas
corpus
always
differed
ordinary
civil
litigation
however
one
important
respect
doctrine
res
judicata
never
thought
apply
see
brown
allen
darr
burford
waley
johnston
salinger
loisel
state
prisoner
precluded
raising
federal
claim
habeas
already
rejected
state
courts
say
state
factfinding
entitled
weight
every
state
prisoner
opportunity
relitigate
facts
found
state
courts
concerns
federalism
comity
pushed
us
extreme
importance
writ
repelled
us
opposite
extreme
represented
strict
application
res
judicata
instead
consistently
occupied
middle
ground
even
townsend
federal
courts
deferred
state
findings
fact
federal
district
judge
satisfied
state
fairly
considered
issues
evidence
reached
satisfactory
result
see
brown
supra
frank
mangum
case
federal
entertaining
habeas
petition
examine
facts
anew
see
ex
parte
hawk
moore
supra
hawk
example
stated
state
prisoner
entitled
hearing
resort
state
remedies
failed
afford
full
fair
adjudication
federal
contentions
raised
particular
case
remedy
afforded
state
law
proves
practice
unavailable
seriously
inadequate
brown
explained
hearing
may
dispensed
record
application
affords
adequate
opportunity
weigh
sufficiency
allegations
evidence
unusual
circumstances
calling
hearing
presented
townsend
launch
new
directions
weisselberg
evidentiary
hearings
federal
habeas
corpus
cases
clarified
district
measure
adequacy
state
proceeding
townsend
specified
six
circumstances
one
confident
state
trier
fact
full
hearing
reliably
found
relevant
facts
held
habeas
petitioner
entitled
evidentiary
hearing
factual
allegations
merits
factual
dispute
resolved
state
hearing
state
factual
determination
fairly
supported
record
whole
factfinding
procedure
employed
state
adequate
afford
full
fair
hearing
substantial
allegation
newly
discovered
evidence
material
facts
adequately
developed
state
hearing
reason
appears
state
trier
fact
afford
habeas
applicant
full
fair
fact
hearing
ibid
expressed
concern
townsend
petitioner
might
abuse
fifth
circumstance
described
opinion
deliberately
withholding
evidence
state
factfinder
hope
finding
receptive
forum
federal
discourage
sort
disrespect
state
proceedings
held
petitioner
entitled
hearing
ibid
townsend
opinion
need
address
concern
much
detail
similar
issue
discussed
greater
length
another
case
decided
day
fay
noia
townsend
opinion
thus
merely
referred
reader
discussion
fay
similar
exception
held
bar
state
prisoner
habeas
relief
prisoner
intentionally
committed
procedural
default
state
see
townsend
supra
nearly
years
later
implies
fay
townsend
must
stand
fall
together
ante
townsend
suggest
issues
townsend
fay
identical
similar
logic
required
identical
answer
townsend
purport
rely
fay
authority
merely
referred
fay
discussion
shorthand
device
avoid
repeating
similar
analysis
indeed
reliance
fay
authority
unnecessary
townsend
essentially
elaboration
prior
cases
regarding
holding
hearings
federal
habeas
cases
fay
represented
overruling
prior
cases
regarding
procedural
defaults
see
coleman
thompson
wainwright
sykes
recognizes
ante
applied
townsend
analysis
ever
since
see
vasquez
hillery
cuyler
sullivan
jackson
virginia
lavallee
delle
rose
boyd
dutton
procunier
atchley
view
unjustifiably
clinging
poorly
reasoned
precedent
properly
abandoned
fay
inconsistent
prior
cases
represented
balance
state
federal
interests
said
townsend
today
holds
even
reliability
state
factfinding
doubtful
crucial
evidence
presented
state
trier
fact
habeas
petitioner
ordinarily
entitled
opportunity
prove
facts
necessary
claim
holding
course
directly
overrules
portion
townsend
think
departs
significantly
law
habeas
corpus
even
townsend
habeas
petitioner
claim
properly
federal
accurate
resolution
claim
depended
proof
facts
resolved
petitioner
unreliable
state
proceeding
petitioner
entitled
day
federal
justice
holmes
wrote
case
state
courts
rejected
somewhat
suspicious
circumstances
petitioner
allegation
trial
dominated
angry
mob
seem
us
sufficient
allow
judge
escape
duty
examining
facts
true
alleged
make
trial
absolutely
void
moore
class
petitioners
eligible
present
claims
habeas
may
narrower
days
gone
class
claims
one
might
present
may
smaller
claim
properly
right
hearing
construed
narrowly
construes
today
instead
looking
history
right
evidentiary
hearing
simply
borrows
cause
prejudice
standard
series
recent
habeas
corpus
cases
ante
one
cases
address
question
habeas
claim
properly
federal
despite
petitioner
procedural
default
see
coleman
thompson
supra
murray
carrier
reed
ross
engle
isaac
wainwright
sykes
supra
francis
henderson
remaining
case
addresses
issue
petitioner
abuse
writ
see
mccleskey
zant
cases
concern
question
whether
federal
consider
merits
claim
whether
authority
upset
judgment
affirmed
direct
appeal
far
threshold
inquiry
concerned
respect
state
procedural
rules
need
discourage
abuse
writ
provide
justification
cause
prejudice
standard
said
former
context
great
writ
imposes
special
costs
federal
system
possess
primary
authority
defining
enforcing
criminal
law
criminal
trials
also
hold
initial
responsibility
vindicating
constitutional
rights
federal
intrusions
state
criminal
trials
frustrate
sovereign
power
punish
offenders
good
faith
attempts
honor
constitutional
rights
engle
supra
question
considering
quite
different
federal
district
already
determined
consider
claimed
constitutional
violation
question
go
comes
determining
whether
hearing
held
resolve
claim
already
properly
federal
federalism
concerns
underlying
procedural
default
cases
diminished
somewhat
point
concern
less
encroaching
territory
state
courts
managing
territory
federal
courts
manner
best
implement
responsibility
consider
habeas
petitions
adoption
cause
prejudice
standard
resolve
first
concern
cause
us
reflexively
adopt
standard
resolve
second
federalism
comity
finality
advanced
declining
permit
relitigation
claims
federal
certain
circumstances
interests
less
significantly
advanced
relitigation
properly
occurs
permitting
district
courts
resolve
claims
based
incomplete
record
iii
decision
today
reconciled
subsection
congress
enacted
three
years
decided
townsend
subsection
provides
state
factfinding
shall
presumed
correct
unless
applicant
shall
establish
one
eight
listed
circumstances
circumstances
taken
word
word
townsend
including
one
issue
renders
presumption
correctness
inapplicable
material
facts
adequately
developed
state
hearing
effect
presumption
augment
habeas
petitioner
burden
proof
state
factfinding
presumed
correct
petitioner
must
establish
state
error
convincing
evidence
state
factfinding
presumed
correct
petitioner
must
prove
facts
necessary
support
claim
preponderance
evidence
sumner
mata
section
strict
sense
codification
holding
townsend
listed
circumstances
townsend
hearing
must
held
nearly
identical
listed
circumstances
facts
found
state
presumed
correct
two
obviously
intertwined
habeas
petitioner
fulfills
one
townsend
requirements
entitled
hearing
virtue
fulfilling
townsend
requirement
necessarily
also
fulfilled
one
requirements
hearing
presumption
correctness
apply
hand
petitioner
fulfilled
one
townsend
requirements
generally
fulfilled
corresponding
requirement
either
entitled
neither
hearing
exception
presumption
correctness
townsend
work
hand
hand
petitioner
right
hearing
must
prove
facts
preponderance
evidence
right
hearing
must
prove
facts
higher
standard
convincing
evidence
without
opportunity
hearing
safe
assume
higher
standard
unattainable
petitioners
see
yackle
postconviction
remedies
enacting
statute
closely
parallels
townsend
congress
established
procedural
framework
relies
upon
townsend
continuing
validity
general
therefore
overruling
townsend
frustrate
evident
intent
congress
question
hearing
held
governed
standards
question
federal
defer
state
factfinding
particular
adoption
cause
prejudice
standard
determining
whether
material
facts
adequately
developed
state
proceedings
frustrate
congress
intent
respect
townsend
circumstance
statutory
analog
case
fit
within
townsend
circumstance
none
townsend
circumstances
case
likely
like
one
material
facts
developed
attorney
error
reason
material
facts
might
developed
unknown
time
state
denied
full
fair
opportunity
develop
almost
certainly
covered
one
townsend
circumstances
see
townsend
already
held
attorney
error
short
constitutionally
ineffective
assistance
counsel
amount
cause
see
murray
carrier
result
practical
effect
ruling
today
case
fall
within
townsend
fifth
circumstance
petitioner
entitled
hearing
ground
material
facts
adequately
developed
state
ground
petitioner
attorney
must
rendered
constitutionally
ineffective
assistance
presenting
facts
state
factfinder
effect
little
ironic
state
factfinding
occurs
trial
counsel
ineffectiveness
entitle
petitioner
hearing
entitle
petitioner
new
trial
case
state
factfinding
occurs
postconviction
proceeding
petitioner
constitutional
right
effective
assistance
counsel
counsel
poor
performance
never
constitute
cause
cause
prejudice
standard
coleman
thompson
today
decision
petitioners
entitled
hearing
townsend
fifth
circumstance
people
need
one
already
obtained
new
trial
already
entitled
hearing
one
circumstances
thus
rendered
unusable
portion
townsend
requiring
hearings
material
facts
adequately
developed
state
noted
fact
uses
language
identical
language
used
townsend
strongly
suggests
congress
presumed
continued
existence
portion
townsend
moreover
application
cause
prejudice
standard
creates
conundrum
regarding
interpret
cause
prejudice
standard
applies
well
townsend
fifth
circumstance
rendered
superfluous
reason
part
townsend
become
superfluous
may
deprive
portions
prior
decisions
effect
generally
may
course
portions
statutes
hand
cause
prejudice
standard
apply
uncoupled
statute
case
intended
follow
likely
instances
petitioner
entitled
exception
presumption
correctness
entitled
hearing
result
accord
evident
intent
congress
first
inquiry
track
second
reconciliation
two
questions
left
district
courts
still
possess
discretion
removed
today
opinion
hold
hearings
even
mandatory
see
townsend
supra
reasons
think
presumes
continuing
validity
decision
townsend
including
portion
decision
recognized
deliberate
bypass
exception
petitioner
right
hearing
material
facts
adequately
developed
state
jose
alleges
pleaded
nolo
contendere
crime
understand
exhausted
state
remedies
committed
procedural
default
properly
presented
claim
federal
district
first
petition
writ
habeas
corpus
entitled
hearing
standard
set
forth
townsend
given
claim
properly
district
cut
right
prove
claim
hearing
respectfully
dissent
justice
kennedy
dissenting
definition
cases
within
ambit
holding
confined
factual
record
developed
state
proceedings
inadequate
resolve
legal
question
think
cases
number
townsend
sain
law
almost
years
clear
evidence
particular
classification
habeas
proceedings
burdened
dockets
federal
courts
view
concept
factual
inadequacy
comprehends
petitions
respect
realistic
possibility
evidentiary
hearing
make
difference
outcome
serves
narrow
number
cases
respect
insure
ones
justice
points
valid
concerns
constitutional
error
recent
decisions
coleman
thompson
mccleskey
zant
teague
lane
serve
protect
integrity
writ
curbing
abuse
ensuring
legal
questions
presented
ones
resolved
state
invalidate
final
judgment
consider
today
habeas
actions
present
questions
federal
courts
bound
decide
order
protect
constitutional
rights
take
steps
diminish
likelihood
courts
base
legal
decision
accurate
assessment
facts
reasons
set
forth
justice
dissent
opinion
judgment