stringer
black
argued
december
decided
march
finding
petitioner
stringer
guilty
capital
murder
mississippi
jury
sentencing
phase
case
found
three
statutory
aggravating
factors
included
factor
murder
especially
heinous
atrocious
cruel
otherwise
defined
trial
instructions
stringer
sentenced
death
sentence
affirmed
state
direct
review
postconviction
relief
denied
state
courts
federal
district
denied
habeas
corpus
relief
rejecting
contention
heinous
atrocious
cruel
aggravating
factor
vague
render
sentence
arbitrary
violation
eighth
amendment
proscription
cruel
unusual
punishment
appeals
ultimately
affirmed
holding
stringer
entitled
rely
clemons
mississippi
maynard
cartwright
habeas
corpus
proceedings
decisions
issued
sentence
became
final
announced
new
rule
defined
teague
lane
held
federal
habeas
corpus
proceeding
petitioner
whose
death
sentence
became
final
maynard
clemons
decided
foreclosed
teague
relying
cases
pp
petitioner
seeks
federal
habeas
relief
based
principle
announced
final
judgment
teague
requires
federal
determine
first
whether
decision
question
announced
new
rule
dictated
precedent
existing
judgment
became
final
answer
yes
neither
two
exceptions
apply
decision
available
petitioner
second
decision
announce
new
rule
necessary
inquire
whether
granting
relief
sought
create
new
rule
prior
decision
applied
novel
setting
thereby
extending
precedent
see
butler
mckellar
purposes
teague
maynard
announce
new
rule
invalidation
oklahoma
especially
heinous
atrocious
cruel
aggravating
circumstance
controlled
godfrey
georgia
held
georgia
aggravating
circumstance
killing
outrageously
wantonly
vile
horrible
inhuman
vague
imprecise
inviting
arbitrary
capricious
application
death
penalty
violation
eighth
amendment
pp
rejects
state
contention
time
stringer
conviction
became
final
clemons
new
rule
apply
godfrey
maynard
holdings
mississippi
sentencing
system
differences
use
aggravating
factors
system
use
georgia
system
godfrey
principal
critical
difference
two
schemes
mississippi
unlike
georgia
weighing
state
jury
found
defendant
guilty
capital
murder
found
least
one
statutory
aggravating
factor
must
weigh
factors
mitigating
evidence
zant
stephens
expressly
left
open
possibility
weighing
state
infection
process
invalid
aggravating
factor
might
require
invalidation
death
sentence
although
clemons
later
held
appellate
case
reweigh
aggravating
mitigating
circumstances
undertake
harmless
error
analysis
suggested
eighth
amendment
permits
weighing
state
appellate
affirm
death
sentence
without
thorough
analysis
role
invalid
aggravating
factor
played
sentencing
process
required
courts
implement
requirement
individualized
sentencing
determinations
death
penalty
cases
see
zant
supra
nonweighing
state
long
sentencing
body
finds
least
one
valid
aggravating
factor
fact
also
finds
invalid
factor
infect
formal
process
deciding
whether
death
appropriate
sentencing
body
told
weigh
invalid
factor
decision
weighing
process
skewed
thus
fact
mississippi
weighing
state
gives
emphasis
requirement
aggravating
factors
defined
degree
precision
underscores
applicability
godfrey
maynard
mississippi
system
pp
moreover
precedent
existing
time
stringer
sentence
became
final
defeats
state
contention
clemons
reasonable
believe
constitutional
requirement
define
aggravating
factors
precision
mississippi
system
lowenfield
phelps
distinguished
important
mississippi
final
authority
meaning
mississippi
law
times
viewed
state
capital
sentencing
scheme
subject
godfrey
dictates
see
gilliard
state
correctness
view
matter
federal
law
evident
issue
even
mentioned
clemons
unchallenged
state
took
granted
proposition
state
uses
aggravating
factors
deciding
shall
eligible
receive
death
penalty
use
factors
practical
matter
fail
guide
sentencer
discretion
see
blackmun
concurring
part
dissenting
part
fact
two
fifth
circuit
cases
ruled
godfrey
inapplicable
mississippi
dispositive
since
cases
ignored
state
characterization
law
accorded
significance
centrality
aggravating
factors
weighing
phase
mississippi
capital
sentencing
proceeding
therefore
seriously
mistaken
precedents
existing
even
maynard
clemons
pp
kennedy
delivered
opinion
rehnquist
white
blackmun
stevens
joined
souter
filed
dissenting
opinion
scalia
thomas
joined
kenneth
rose
appointment
argued
cause
petitioner
brief
james
craig
louis
bilionis
marvin
white
assistant
attorney
general
mississippi
argued
cause
respondents
brief
mike
moore
attorney
general
briefs
amici
curiae
urging
affirmance
filed
state
texas
et
al
dan
morales
attorney
general
texas
pryor
first
assistant
attorney
general
mary
keller
deputy
attorney
general
michael
hodge
dana
parker
margaret
portman
griffey
assistant
attorneys
general
attorneys
general
respective
follows
james
evans
alabama
grant
woods
arizona
daniel
lungren
california
linley
pearson
indiana
frederic
cowan
kentucky
william
webster
missouri
marc
racicot
montana
frankie
sue
del
papa
nevada
lacy
thornburg
north
carolina
susan
loving
oklahoma
ernest
preate
pennsylvania
mary
sue
terry
virginia
joseph
meyer
wyoming
criminal
justice
legal
foundation
kent
scheidegger
justice
kennedy
delivered
opinion
death
sentence
petitioner
case
decreed
judgment
became
final
decided
either
maynard
cartwright
clemons
mississippi
petitioner
argues
state
mississippi
committed
error
case
clemons
maynard
clemons
sentence
unconstitutional
question
presented
whether
federal
habeas
corpus
proceeding
petitioner
foreclosed
relying
maynard
clemons
either
announced
new
rule
defined
teague
lane
june
ray
mcwilliams
wife
nell
shot
death
jackson
mississippi
home
part
armed
robbery
petitioner
james
stringer
fire
fatal
shots
plan
robbery
take
part
killing
part
plan
outset
crimes
gruesome
aspects
described
opinion
mississippi
direct
review
conviction
sentence
stringer
state
mississippi
law
death
sentence
may
imposed
murders
designated
statute
capital
murder
ann
supp
killing
course
burglary
robbery
included
within
category
following
capital
murder
conviction
jury
mississippi
system
proceeds
sentencing
phase
case
defendant
convicted
capital
murder
receive
death
sentence
jury
must
find
least
one
eight
statutory
aggravating
factors
must
determine
aggravating
factor
factors
outweighed
mitigating
circumstances
jury
found
petitioner
guilty
capital
murder
course
robbery
sentencing
phase
jury
found
three
statutory
aggravating
factors
aggravating
factors
defined
jury
instructions
part
following
statutory
wording
defendant
contemplated
life
taken
capital
murder
intentionally
committed
defendant
engaged
attempt
commit
robbery
committed
pecuniary
gain
capital
murder
committed
purpose
avoiding
preventing
detection
lawful
arrest
james
stringer
defendant
capital
murder
especially
heinous
atrocious
cruel
brief
respondents
direct
review
mississippi
affirmed
stringer
state
supra
respect
sentence
found
imposed
influence
passion
prejudice
arbitrary
factor
evidence
fully
support
ed
jury
finding
statutorily
required
aggravating
circumstances
death
sentence
disproportionate
sentences
imposed
cases
ibid
petitioner
conviction
became
final
denied
certiorari
february
stringer
mississippi
postconviction
relief
denied
state
courts
stringer
state
case
comes
us
proceedings
begun
petitioner
filed
first
federal
habeas
petition
district
southern
district
mississippi
relevant
claim
petitioner
contention
third
aggravating
factor
found
jury
considered
sentencing
proceeding
heinous
atrocious
cruel
aggravating
factor
vague
render
sentence
arbitrary
violation
eighth
amendment
proscription
cruel
unusual
punishment
district
found
claim
subject
procedural
bar
alternative
ruled
merit
stringer
scroggy
without
consideration
procedural
bar
question
appeals
affirmed
merits
finding
constitutional
infirmity
jury
consideration
third
aggravating
factor
two
aggravating
factors
unchallenged
stringer
jackson
appeals
affirmed
decided
clemons
mississippi
later
vacated
opinion
consideration
remand
appeals
held
petitioner
entitled
rely
clemons
related
case
maynard
cartwright
habeas
corpus
proceeding
decisions
announced
new
rule
sentence
final
relied
upon
earlier
analysis
smith
black
cert
pending
case
also
presented
question
whether
clemons
maynard
announced
new
rule
granted
certiorari
reverse
ii
subject
two
exceptions
cast
decided
petitioner
conviction
sentence
became
final
may
predicate
federal
habeas
corpus
relief
unless
decision
dictated
precedent
existing
judgment
question
became
final
butler
mckellar
penry
lynaugh
teague
lane
explained
butler
new
rule
principle
validates
reasonable
good
faith
interpretations
existing
precedents
made
state
courts
even
though
shown
contrary
later
decisions
neither
one
exceptions
issue
inquiry
confined
question
whether
clemons
maynard
announced
new
rule
petitioner
seeks
federal
habeas
relief
based
upon
principle
announced
final
judgment
teague
subsequent
decisions
interpreting
require
federal
answer
initial
question
cases
second
first
must
determined
whether
decision
relied
upon
announced
new
rule
answer
yes
neither
exception
applies
decision
available
petitioner
however
decision
announce
new
rule
necessary
inquire
whether
granting
relief
sought
create
new
rule
prior
decision
applied
novel
setting
thereby
extending
precedent
see
butler
mckellar
supra
interests
finality
predictability
comity
underlying
new
rule
jurisprudence
may
undermined
equal
degree
invocation
rule
dictated
precedent
application
old
rule
manner
dictated
precedent
determination
whether
maynard
clemons
announced
new
rule
must
begin
godfrey
georgia
godfrey
invalidated
death
sentence
based
upon
aggravating
circumstance
killing
outrageously
wantonly
vile
horrible
inhuman
id
formulation
deemed
vague
imprecise
inviting
arbitrary
capricious
application
death
penalty
violation
eighth
amendment
later
applied
analysis
reasoning
maynard
maynard
aggravating
circumstance
oklahoma
statute
applied
killing
especially
heinous
atrocious
cruel
found
language
gave
guidance
statute
godfrey
invalidated
oklahoma
formulation
case
us
mississippi
argue
maynard
announced
new
rule
us
appears
wise
concession
godfrey
maynard
indeed
involve
somewhat
different
language
mistake
conclude
vagueness
ruling
godfrey
limited
precise
language
us
case
applying
godfrey
language
us
maynard
brea
new
ground
butler
mckellar
supra
maynard
therefore
purposes
teague
controlled
godfrey
announce
new
rule
substance
state
contention
new
rule
apply
godfrey
maynard
holdings
mississippi
sentencing
process
state
argues
must
open
question
petitioner
sentence
became
final
clemons
yet
undecided
acknowledge
differences
use
aggravating
factors
mississippi
capital
sentencing
system
use
georgia
system
godfrey
view
however
differences
considered
basis
denying
relief
light
precedent
existing
time
petitioner
sentence
became
final
indeed
extent
differences
significant
suggest
application
godfrey
principle
mississippi
sentencing
process
follows
fortiori
application
georgia
system
principal
difference
sentencing
schemes
georgia
mississippi
mississippi
termed
weighing
state
georgia
see
clemons
mississippi
parker
dugger
mississippi
law
jury
found
defendant
guilty
capital
murder
found
existence
least
one
statutory
aggravating
factor
must
weigh
aggravating
factor
factors
mitigating
evidence
contrast
georgia
jury
must
find
existence
one
aggravating
factor
imposing
death
penalty
aggravating
factors
specific
function
jury
decision
whether
defendant
found
eligible
death
penalty
receive
circumstances
case
instead
georgia
scheme
making
decision
penalty
factfinder
takes
consideration
circumstances
sentence
phases
trial
circumstances
relate
offense
defendant
zant
stephens
quoting
response
georgia
certified
question
mississippi
weighing
state
gives
emphasis
requirement
aggravating
factors
defined
degree
precision
express
language
zant
left
open
possibility
weighing
state
infection
process
invalid
aggravating
factor
might
require
invalidation
death
sentence
although
later
held
clemons
mississippi
circumstances
state
appellate
reweigh
aggravating
mitigating
circumstances
undertake
analysis
suggested
eighth
amendment
permits
state
appellate
weighing
state
affirm
death
sentence
without
thorough
analysis
role
invalid
aggravating
factor
played
sentencing
process
require
close
appellate
scrutiny
import
effect
invalid
aggravating
factors
implement
eighth
amendment
requirement
individualized
sentencing
determinations
death
penalty
cases
see
zant
supra
eddings
oklahoma
lockett
ohio
plurality
opinion
roberts
louisiana
gregg
georgia
joint
opinion
stewart
powell
stevens
jj
woodson
north
carolina
plurality
opinion
order
state
appellate
affirm
death
sentence
sentencer
instructed
consider
invalid
factor
must
determine
sentencer
done
absent
factor
otherwise
defendant
deprived
precision
individualized
consideration
demands
godfrey
maynard
line
cases
principles
appellate
review
illustrated
decision
barclay
florida
florida
like
mississippi
weighing
state
parker
dugger
supra
trial
judge
imposes
sentence
based
upon
recommendation
jury
barclay
sentencing
judge
relied
aggravating
factor
legitimate
one
state
law
affirmed
sentence
clear
florida
determined
sentence
sentencing
judge
given
weight
invalid
factor
see
plurality
opinion
opinion
stevens
therefore
contrary
dissent
suggestion
post
fact
principal
opinions
barclay
focused
weight
sentencer
gave
invalid
aggravating
factor
demonstrates
reviewing
weighing
state
may
make
automatic
assumption
factor
infected
weighing
process
short
may
make
automatic
assumption
stringer
claims
mississippi
made
case
view
general
requirement
individualized
sentencing
specific
requirement
sentence
based
improper
factor
reassessed
care
assure
proper
consideration
given
arguable
basis
support
view
appeals
time
petitioner
sentence
became
final
mississippi
permitted
apply
rule
automatic
affirmance
death
sentence
supported
multiple
aggravating
factors
one
invalid
respect
function
state
reviewing
determining
whether
sentence
upheld
despite
use
improper
aggravating
factor
difference
weighing
state
nonweighing
state
one
semantics
appeals
thought
stringer
jackson
critical
importance
nonweighing
state
long
sentencing
body
finds
least
one
valid
aggravating
factor
fact
also
finds
invalid
aggravating
factor
infect
formal
process
deciding
whether
death
appropriate
penalty
assuming
determination
state
appellate
invalid
factor
made
difference
jury
determination
constitutional
violation
resulting
introduction
invalid
factor
earlier
stage
proceedings
sentencing
body
told
weigh
invalid
factor
decision
reviewing
may
assume
made
difference
thumb
removed
death
side
scale
weighing
process
skewed
constitutional
analysis
reweighing
trial
appellate
level
suffices
guarantee
defendant
received
individualized
sentence
clear
principle
emerges
single
case
dissent
require
post
long
line
authority
setting
forth
dual
constitutional
criteria
precise
individualized
sentencing
thus
principal
difference
sentencing
systems
mississippi
georgia
different
role
played
aggravating
factors
two
underscores
applicability
godfrey
maynard
mississippi
system
although
made
similar
argument
clemons
state
contends
clemons
reasonable
believe
constitutional
requirement
define
aggravating
factors
precision
mississippi
system
points
fact
order
jury
find
defendant
guilty
capital
murder
must
find
crime
fits
within
narrow
precise
statutory
definition
offense
additional
consideration
aggravating
factors
sentencing
phase
view
constitutional
significance
requisite
differentiation
among
defendants
death
penalty
purposes
taken
place
jury
deliberation
respect
guilt
state
cites
decision
lowenfield
phelps
support
analysis
lowenfield
arising
louisiana
law
applicable
indicate
clemons
imposed
new
rule
louisiana
person
eligible
death
penalty
unless
found
guilty
homicide
category
narrow
general
category
homicide
defendant
guilty
homicide
louisiana
jury
finds
killing
fits
one
five
statutory
criteria
see
quoting
la
rev
stat
ann
west
determining
defendant
guilty
murder
louisiana
jury
next
must
decide
whether
least
one
statutory
aggravating
circumstance
considering
mitigating
circumstances
determine
whether
death
penalty
appropriate
unlike
mississippi
process
louisiana
jury
required
weigh
aggravating
mitigating
factors
lowenfield
petitioner
argued
death
sentence
invalid
aggravating
factor
found
jury
duplicated
elements
already
found
determining
homicide
rejected
argument
consequence
louisiana
sentencing
procedures
failed
narrow
class
defendants
predictable
manner
observed
use
aggravating
circumstances
end
means
genuinely
narrowing
class
persons
thereby
channeling
jury
discretion
see
reason
narrowing
function
may
performed
jury
findings
either
sentencing
phase
trial
guilt
phase
went
compare
louisiana
scheme
texas
scheme
required
narrowing
occurs
guilt
phase
discussing
jurek
texas
also
contrasted
louisiana
scheme
georgia
florida
schemes
state
premise
mississippi
sentencing
scheme
comparable
louisiana
error
mississippi
stated
uncertain
terms
exception
one
distinction
relevant
sentencing
system
operates
manner
florida
system
florida
course
subject
rule
forbidding
automatic
affirmance
state
appellate
invalid
aggravating
factor
relied
upon
considering
godfrey
claim
based
factor
issue
mississippi
considered
decisions
florida
appropriate
source
guidance
gilliard
state
miss
mississippi
compared
claim
claim
dobbert
state
cert
denied
stated
dobbert
florida
held
even
though
lower
considered
two
circumstances
pass
constitutional
muster
amount
aggravating
circumstances
one
aggravating
circumstance
existed
sufficient
uphold
death
penalty
distinction
dobbert
present
case
dobbert
florida
law
judge
determined
sentence
without
jury
gilliard
supra
matter
federal
law
moreover
view
mississippi
godfrey
dictates
apply
capital
sentencing
procedure
correct
indeed
evident
issue
even
mentioned
clemons
took
granted
state
challenge
proposition
state
uses
aggravating
factors
deciding
shall
eligible
death
penalty
shall
receive
death
penalty
use
factors
practical
matter
fail
guide
sentencer
discretion
see
clemons
supra
opinion
blackmun
joined
brennan
marshall
stevens
concurring
part
dissenting
part
noting
unconstitutionality
vague
aggravating
factor
implicit
opinion
even
free
ignore
mississippi
understanding
way
law
works
reject
suggestion
lowenfield
form
basis
argument
godfrey
apply
mississippi
although
precedents
require
use
aggravating
factors
permitted
state
aggravating
factors
decisive
use
factors
vague
imprecise
content
vague
aggravating
factor
employed
purpose
determining
whether
defendant
eligible
death
penalty
fails
channel
sentencer
discretion
vague
aggravating
factor
used
weighing
process
sense
worse
creates
risk
jury
treat
defendant
deserving
death
penalty
might
otherwise
relying
upon
existence
illusory
circumstance
use
vague
aggravating
factor
weighing
process
creates
possibility
randomness
also
bias
favor
death
penalty
cautioned
zant
might
requirement
weighing
process
infected
vague
factor
death
sentence
must
invalidated
nothing
lowenfield
suggests
proscription
vague
aggravating
factors
apply
capital
sentencing
system
like
mississippi
lowenfield
involve
claim
statutory
aggravating
factor
ambiguous
relevance
godfrey
find
necessary
cite
line
cases
following
godfrey
slight
best
also
note
state
reliance
lowenfield
show
anticipated
godfrey
application
mississippi
somewhat
odd
lowenfield
decided
petitioner
conviction
sentence
already
final
fiction
state
contend
courts
relied
decision
say
state
rely
decision
announced
petitioner
conviction
sentence
became
final
defeat
claim
merits
insofar
new
rule
jurisprudence
validates
reasonable
good
faith
interpretations
existing
precedents
butler
mckellar
however
state
may
little
cause
complain
deciding
allow
petitioner
rely
upon
decision
federal
courts
look
precedents
state
courts
knew
relevant
time
event
need
dwell
anachronism
inherent
state
lowenfield
argument
concluded
case
provide
basis
concluding
new
rule
apply
godfrey
mississippi
system
state
next
argues
clemons
application
godfrey
mississippi
dictated
precedent
prior
clemons
fifth
circuit
concluded
godfrey
apply
mississippi
see
evans
thigpen
cert
denied
johnson
thigpen
cert
denied
addressing
merits
argument
reiterate
rationale
fifth
circuit
adopted
mississippi
state
primary
beneficiary
teague
doctrine
mississippi
recognized
bound
godfrey
see
mhoon
state
requiring
based
godfrey
capital
sentencing
jury
given
narrowing
construction
heinous
atrocious
cruel
factor
fifth
circuit
views
relevant
inquiry
see
butler
supra
dispositive
purpose
new
rule
doctrine
validate
reasonable
interpretations
existing
precedents
reasonableness
many
contexts
objective
standard
ultimate
decision
whether
clemons
dictated
precedent
based
objective
reading
relevant
cases
short
answer
state
argument
fifth
circuit
made
serious
mistake
evans
thigpen
johnson
thigpen
fifth
circuit
ignored
mississippi
characterization
law
accorded
significance
fact
mississippi
aggravating
factors
central
weighing
phase
capital
sentencing
proceeding
explained
facts
accorded
proper
significance
precedents
even
maynard
clemons
yield
principle
use
vague
imprecise
aggravating
factor
weighing
process
invalidates
sentence
least
requires
constitutional
harmless
error
analysis
reweighing
state
judicial
system
reverse
decision
appeals
remand
case
proceedings
consistent
opinion
ordered
today
holds
reasonable
jurist
believed
two
years
zant
stephens
holding
case
apply
weighing
state
maintains
contrary
obvious
sentencer
weighing
vague
aggravating
circumstance
deprives
defendant
individualized
sentencing
may
obvious
maynard
cartwright
submit
decided
case
respectfully
dissent
principle
first
announced
teague
lane
prisoner
seeking
habeas
corpus
relief
federal
generally
benefit
new
rule
announced
prisoner
conviction
became
final
plurality
opinion
exhausting
direct
appeals
see
penry
lynaugh
decision
announces
new
rule
result
dictated
precedent
existing
time
defendant
conviction
became
final
teague
supra
plurality
opinion
emphasis
omitted
result
given
case
dictated
precedent
susceptible
debate
among
reasonable
minds
butler
mckellar
put
differently
reasonable
jurists
may
disagree
sawyer
smith
petitioner
conviction
became
final
teague
purposes
february
claims
benefit
rule
eighth
amendment
violation
occurs
sentencer
weighing
state
considers
vague
aggravating
circumstance
even
sentencer
also
found
existence
least
one
aggravating
circumstance
neither
vague
otherwise
infirm
never
endorsed
position
february
discuss
relevant
decisions
infra
part
decisions
implicitly
least
announced
rule
petitioner
invokes
infra
part
finally
enquire
whether
rule
dictated
decisions
infra
part
ii
cases
determining
apposite
law
start
godfrey
georgia
georgia
sentencing
scheme
defendant
given
life
sentence
unless
jury
finds
one
aggravating
circumstances
jury
aggravating
circumstances
longer
play
role
jury
instructed
determine
whether
defendant
receive
death
sentence
considering
evidence
aggravation
mitigation
jury
instructed
weigh
aggravating
circumstances
mitigating
circumstances
godfrey
georgia
jury
returned
death
verdict
strength
one
aggravating
circumstance
murder
outrageously
wantonly
vile
horrible
inhuman
plurality
opinion
saying
person
ordinary
sensibility
fairly
categorize
almost
every
murder
outrageously
wantonly
vile
horrible
inhuman
held
circumstance
failed
impose
restraint
arbitrary
capricious
infliction
death
sentence
accordingly
georgia
sentencing
scheme
applied
violated
eighth
amendment
way
scheme
struck
furman
georgia
failed
provide
meaningful
basis
distinguishing
cases
penalty
imposed
many
cases
internal
quotations
omitted
godfrey
came
zant
stephens
arising
georgia
jury
death
verdict
based
showing
several
aggravating
circumstances
one
respondent
substantial
history
serious
assaultive
criminal
convictions
shortly
respondent
sentencing
georgia
different
case
held
substantial
history
circumstance
left
wide
latitude
discretion
jury
whether
impose
death
penalty
rendering
death
sentence
imposed
upon
strength
substantial
history
circumstance
alone
unconstitutional
furman
arnold
state
georgia
nevertheless
refused
vacate
stephens
sentence
holding
adequately
supported
unchallenged
aggravating
circumstances
stephens
state
cert
denied
agreed
holding
godfrey
distinguishable
case
single
aggravating
circumstance
failed
narrow
class
persons
eligible
death
penalty
required
eighth
amendment
stephens
remaining
aggravating
circumstances
properly
discharged
narrowing
obligation
vagueness
one
among
several
aggravating
circumstances
therefore
held
irrelevant
scheme
adequate
furman
long
included
mandatory
appellate
review
arbitrariness
disproportionality
stemming
source
last
relevant
decision
barclay
florida
florida
scheme
like
one
georgia
requires
sentencer
impose
life
sentence
finds
aggravating
circumstances
present
unlike
georgia
florida
weighing
state
sentencer
finds
one
aggravating
circumstances
exist
must
determine
sentence
weighing
aggravating
mitigating
circumstances
barclay
judge
imposed
death
sentence
finding
several
aggravating
circumstances
one
petitioner
criminal
record
florida
law
recognize
aggravating
circumstance
held
resulting
death
sentence
violate
eighth
amendment
reason
sentence
stephens
remaining
aggravating
circumstances
satisfied
eighth
amendment
narrowing
requirement
see
plurality
opinion
stevens
concurring
judgment
see
also
opinion
rehnquist
distinguishing
godfrey
involving
one
aggravating
circumstance
first
case
applied
rule
petitioner
seeks
benefit
maynard
cartwright
oklahoma
jury
found
presence
two
aggravating
circumstances
one
murder
especially
heinous
atrocious
cruel
oklahoma
weighing
state
trial
instructed
jury
determining
penalty
weigh
aggravating
circumstances
mitigating
circumstances
jury
eventually
returned
verdict
death
collateral
review
appeals
tenth
circuit
held
heinous
atrocious
cruel
circumstance
without
instruction
vague
godfrey
sense
see
cartwright
maynard
en
banc
distinguishing
stephens
appeals
held
vagueness
amounted
eighth
amendment
violation
oklahoma
weighing
state
vacated
cartwright
sentence
noting
oklahoma
highest
failed
cure
constitutional
defect
either
reweighing
performing
harmless
error
review
affirmed
holding
godfrey
controlled
especially
heinous
atrocious
cruel
circumstance
gave
guidance
outrageously
wantonly
vile
horrible
inhuman
circumstance
maynard
rejected
oklahoma
argument
cartwright
sentence
adequately
supported
unchallenged
aggravating
circumstance
observing
oklahoma
highest
practice
attempting
save
death
penalty
one
several
aggravating
circumstances
found
invalid
instead
simply
commute
death
sentence
imposed
finding
invalid
aggravating
circumstance
sentence
life
imprisonment
see
said
appeals
faulted
undertaking
state
courts
refused
cartwright
followed
clemons
mississippi
like
oklahoma
mississippi
weighing
state
jury
returned
death
verdict
finding
two
aggravating
circumstances
present
one
crime
especially
heinous
atrocious
cruel
finding
two
aggravating
circumstances
outweighed
mitigating
circumstances
mississippi
affirmed
distinguishing
cartwright
ground
inter
alia
oklahoma
procedure
salvaging
death
sentence
resting
part
vague
aggravating
circumstance
established
procedure
mississippi
hen
one
aggravating
circumstance
found
invalid
remaining
valid
aggravating
circumstance
nonetheless
support
death
penalty
verdict
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
clemons
argued
jury
originally
imposed
death
sentence
constitution
demanded
resentencing
jury
whenever
state
appellate
found
jury
considered
unconstitutionally
vague
aggravating
circumstance
rejected
argument
saying
nothing
constitution
forbade
state
appellate
salvage
unconstitutional
sentence
although
minimum
state
appellate
reweigh
perform
harmless
error
review
rejecting
relaxed
rule
authorizing
requiring
affirmance
death
sentence
long
remains
least
one
valid
aggravating
circumstance
explained
automatic
rule
affirmance
weighing
state
invalid
lockett
ohio
eddings
oklahoma
give
defendants
individualized
treatment
result
actual
reweighing
mix
mitigating
factors
aggravating
circumstances
cf
barclay
florida
supra
today
adds
clemons
explanation
reasoning
sentencer
weighing
vague
aggravating
circumstance
deprives
defendant
individualized
sentencing
creates
possibility
randomness
ante
says
sentencer
weighing
vague
aggravating
circumstance
may
ske
weighing
process
ante
placing
thumb
death
side
scale
ibid
creat
ing
risk
treat
ing
defendant
deserving
death
penalty
ante
creat
ing
possibility
bias
favor
death
penalty
ibid
ii
like
godfrey
stephens
petitioner
instant
case
sentenced
death
finding
vague
aggravating
circumstance
like
stephens
unlike
godfrey
sentenced
basis
one
aggravating
circumstance
one
challenged
issue
case
whether
reasonable
believe
sentencer
weighing
vague
aggravating
circumstance
offend
eighth
amendment
long
sentencer
found
least
one
valid
aggravating
circumstance
put
differently
question
whether
reasonable
believe
holding
stephens
apply
weighing
state
majority
answers
questions
negative
saying
reasonable
jurist
failed
discover
concern
randomness
cases
failed
realize
sentencer
weighing
vague
aggravating
circumstance
deprives
defendant
individualized
sentencing
think
answer
endues
jurist
prescience
reasonableness
true
stephens
reserved
judgment
question
whether
holding
apply
weighing
state
deciding
case
express
opinion
concerning
possible
significance
holding
particular
aggravating
circumstance
invalid
statutory
scheme
judge
jury
specifically
instructed
weigh
statutory
aggravating
mitigating
circumstances
exercising
discretion
whether
impose
death
penalty
leap
lengthens
one
considers
barclay
think
reasonable
jurist
concluded
resolved
question
reserved
stephens
decided
barclay
strongly
implied
stephens
principle
applied
weighing
like
florida
see
opinion
rehnquist
stevens
concurring
judgment
majority
attempts
minimize
barclay
saying
barclay
upheld
sentence
clear
florida
determined
sentence
sentencing
judge
given
weight
invalid
factor
ante
citing
opinion
rehnquist
think
barclay
explained
away
easily
true
plurality
opinion
noted
florida
performed
harmless
error
review
ibid
opinion
discussion
point
merely
responded
barclay
argument
florida
failed
apply
state
law
precedent
properly
barclay
maintained
required
review
plurality
rejected
argument
saying
failure
apply
cases
mere
errors
state
law
concern
event
florida
contrary
petitioner
assertions
performed
harmless
error
review
nothing
plurality
opinion
suggests
harmless
error
review
constitutionally
required
sentencer
weighed
invalid
aggravating
circumstance
also
true
concurring
opinion
justice
stevens
justice
powell
cast
fifth
vote
barclay
stated
florida
law
required
florida
reweigh
aggravating
mitigating
circumstances
see
stevens
concurring
judgment
simply
responded
barclay
argument
florida
failed
perform
quantum
appellate
review
constitution
requires
every
capital
case
regardless
whether
trial
commits
state
law
error
see
id
justice
stevens
opinion
merely
noted
held
proffitt
florida
reweighing
satisfied
appellate
review
obligation
constitution
imposed
justice
stevens
never
said
reweighing
constitutionally
required
minimum
sentencer
weighed
invalid
aggravating
circumstance
although
barclay
may
read
assuming
appellate
test
must
passed
death
verdict
stand
weighing
state
despite
finding
invalid
aggravating
circumstance
nowhere
opinions
state
state
mandated
proportionality
review
satisfy
required
constitutional
minimum
see
proffitt
supra
florida
reviews
death
sentence
ensure
similar
results
reached
similar
cases
mississippi
law
requires
review
see
ante
sum
barclay
jurist
mindful
stephens
caveat
reasonably
assumed
weighing
one
invalid
aggravating
circumstance
along
one
valid
ones
need
treated
significant
enough
amount
constitutional
error
state
least
provided
appellate
review
proportionality
dispositive
teague
reasonable
reading
barclay
bars
conclusion
result
cartwright
clemons
dictated
cases
books
fifth
circuit
indeed
held
recently
rule
stephens
applied
weighing
state
see
stringer
jackson
edwards
scroggy
conflict
view
tenth
circuit
see
cartwright
maynard
en
banc
evidence
unreasonable
believe
stephens
govern
result
case
see
butler
mckellar
light
analysis
fifth
circuit
opinion
dismissed
arguable
basis
support
view
expressed
ante
iii
sum
think
precedent
dictated
rule
weighing
vague
aggravating
circumstance
necessarily
violates
eighth
amendment
even
finding
least
one
unobjectionable
aggravating
circumstance
follows
think
reasonable
believe
neither
reweighing
harmless
error
review
required
situation
footnotes
mere
fact
aggravating
circumstance
inclines
sentencer
towards
imposing
death
penalty
course
violate
eighth
amendment
therefore
read
majority
opinion
object
weighing
vague
aggravating
circumstances
skew
operation
scheme
random
application
case
case
say
vague
majority
see
ante
invalid
might
indeed
invalid
aggravating
circumstances
whose
consideration
even
one
valid
ones
tainted
ensuing
death
sentence
reasonable
view
thus
unreasonable
believe
capital
sentence
stand
without
sentencer
instructed
say
consider
constitutionally
protected
behavior
aggravation
see
barclay
florida
opinion
rehnquist
zant
stephens
apply
proposition
weighing
nonweighing
alike
case
valid
aggravating
circumstances
remained
need
discuss
respondents
argument
reasonable
believe
mississippi
murder
statute
performed
constitutionally
required
narrowing
guilt
phase
petitioner
trial
cf
lowenfield
phelps
announced
cartwright
fifth
circuit
distinguished
case
way
mississippi
distinguished
cartwright
clemons
see
stringer
edwards