brown
hartlage
argued
january
decided
april
petitioner
challenger
general
election
respondent
office
commissioner
jefferson
county
committed
televised
press
conference
lowering
commissioners
salaries
elected
upon
learning
commitment
arguably
violated
provision
kentucky
corrupt
practices
act
petitioner
retracted
pledge
face
prohibits
candidate
offering
material
benefits
voters
consideration
votes
petitioner
election
respondent
filed
suit
kentucky
state
alleging
petitioner
violated
seeking
election
declared
void
although
finding
reasoning
earlier
decision
kentucky
appeals
construing
petitioner
violated
statute
promising
reduce
salary
less
fixed
law
trial
concluded
petitioner
fairly
elected
refused
order
new
election
kentucky
appeals
reversed
held
section
applied
case
limit
speech
violation
first
amendment
pp
although
legitimate
interest
preserving
integrity
electoral
processes
state
seeks
restrict
directly
candidate
offer
ideas
voters
first
amendment
requires
restriction
demonstrably
supported
legitimate
state
interest
compelling
one
restriction
operate
without
unnecessarily
circumscribing
protected
expression
pp
application
case
justified
prohibition
buying
votes
petitioner
statements
made
openly
subject
criticism
political
opponent
scrutiny
voters
different
character
corrupting
private
agreements
solicitations
historically
recognized
unprotected
first
amendment
constitutional
basis
upon
pledge
reduce
salary
may
equated
candidate
promise
pay
voters
privately
support
pocketbook
candidate
promise
confer
ultimate
benefit
voter
qua
taxpayer
citizen
member
general
public
lie
beyond
pale
first
amendment
protection
pp
designed
state
interest
ensuring
willingness
persons
serve
public
office
without
remuneration
make
gratuitous
service
sine
qua
non
plausible
candidacy
resulting
persons
independent
wealth
less
ability
chosen
though
better
qualified
afford
serve
reduced
salary
chose
means
unacceptable
first
amendment
state
fear
voters
might
make
choice
provide
state
compelling
justification
limiting
speech
government
function
select
issues
worth
discussing
course
political
campaign
pp
application
justified
basis
state
interests
prerogatives
respect
factual
misstatements
asserted
ground
statute
bars
promises
serve
reduced
salary
salary
official
fixed
law
promise
therefore
delivered
erroneous
statement
inevitable
free
debate
must
protected
freedoms
expression
breathing
space
need
survive
nullifying
petitioner
election
victory
inconsistent
atmosphere
robust
political
debate
required
first
amendment
showing
made
disputed
statement
good
faith
without
knowledge
falsity
reckless
disregard
whether
false
moreover
retracted
statement
promptly
determining
might
false
pp
brennan
delivered
opinion
white
marshall
blackmun
powell
stevens
joined
burger
concurred
judgment
rehnquist
filed
opinion
concurring
result
post
fred
goldberg
argued
cause
petitioner
briefs
jonathan
goldberg
stanley
chauvin
invitation
argued
cause
filed
brief
amicus
curiae
support
judgment
justice
brennan
delivered
opinion
question
presented
whether
first
amendment
applied
fourteenth
amendment
prohibits
state
declaring
election
void
victorious
candidate
announced
voters
campaign
intended
serve
salary
less
fixed
law
case
involves
challenge
application
kentucky
corrupt
practices
act
parties
opposing
candidates
general
election
office
jefferson
county
commissioner
district
petitioner
carl
brown
challenger
respondent
earl
hartlage
incumbent
august
course
campaign
brown
held
televised
press
conference
together
bill
creech
district
candidate
party
ticket
brown
charged
opponent
complicity
form
fiscal
abuse
three
county
commissioners
state
law
limiting
authority
responsibility
legislation
clear
jobs
simply
worth
year
ludicrous
commissioners
nevertheless
see
fit
pay
amount
paid
county
judge
mere
fact
state
law
allows
outrageous
levels
remuneration
justify
payments
fiscal
meeting
hartlage
led
surprise
move
double
salaries
county
commissioners
actions
demonstrated
unmistakable
disrespect
office
chief
executive
county
utter
disdain
spirit
laws
govern
county
system
sing
gray
fringes
law
personal
gain
hartlage
led
move
funnel
county
tax
dollars
commissioners
pockets
app
abhor
commissioners
outrageous
salaries
prove
strength
convictions
one
first
official
acts
county
commissioners
lower
salary
realistic
level
lower
salaries
saving
taxpayers
first
term
office
year
men
enough
admit
made
mistake
discovered
kentucky
decisions
attorney
general
opinions
indicate
pledge
reduce
salaries
elected
may
illegal
hereby
formally
rescind
pledge
reduce
county
commissioners
salary
elected
instead
pledge
seek
corrective
legislation
next
session
general
assembly
correct
silly
provision
state
law
hartlage
filed
action
jefferson
circuit
alleging
brown
violated
corrupt
practices
act
seeking
election
declared
void
office
jefferson
county
commissioner
district
vacated
brown
section
upon
hartlage
based
claim
provides
candidates
prohibited
making
expenditure
loan
promise
agreement
contract
action
elected
consideration
vote
candidate
nomination
election
state
county
city
district
office
shall
expend
pay
promise
loan
become
pecuniarily
liable
way
money
thing
value
either
directly
indirectly
person
consideration
vote
financial
moral
support
person
candidate
shall
promise
agree
make
contract
person
vote
support
particular
individual
thing
measure
consideration
vote
financial
moral
support
person
election
primary
nominating
convention
person
shall
require
candidate
make
promise
agreement
contract
rev
stat
kentucky
appeals
reversed
agreed
circuit
salary
county
commissioners
fixed
law
brown
statement
proscribed
construed
sparks
boggs
supra
appeals
also
held
however
trial
erred
failing
order
new
election
app
held
retraction
offending
statement
consequence
law
state
trial
mistaken
believing
possessed
discretionary
authority
balance
gravity
violation
disenfranchisement
electorate
result
declaring
election
void
ibid
respect
brown
first
amendment
claims
view
hold
promises
serve
reduced
compensation
violation
corrupt
practices
act
immune
regulation
view
provisions
constitution
open
door
arguments
statements
violation
corrupt
practices
act
protected
involve
speech
quoted
approvingly
maxims
state
may
punish
abuse
constitutional
freedom
speech
utterances
inimical
public
welfare
tending
corrupt
public
morals
incite
crime
disturb
public
peace
never
deemed
abridgement
freedom
speech
press
make
course
conduct
illegal
merely
conduct
part
initiated
evidenced
carried
means
language
quoting
jur
constitutional
law
concluded
brown
statement
constitutionally
protected
app
opinion
denying
petitioner
motion
rehearing
pointedly
addressed
petitioner
first
amendment
arguments
found
state
interest
fairness
integrity
elections
compelling
state
insist
elections
conducted
free
corruption
bribery
restated
view
laws
state
promise
brown
considered
attempt
buy
votes
bribe
voters
ibid
finally
rejected
petitioner
argument
construed
sparks
supra
unconstitutionally
broad
although
found
appeal
brown
argument
carried
logical
extreme
promise
candidate
increase
efficiency
thus
lower
cost
government
might
likewise
considered
attempt
buy
votes
view
sparks
controlled
disposition
suggested
petitioner
seek
reconsideration
decision
kentucky
app
kentucky
denied
review
granted
petition
certiorari
ii
begin
analysis
acknowledging
legitimate
interest
preserving
integrity
electoral
processes
state
may
take
steps
ensure
governing
political
institutions
officials
properly
discharge
public
responsibilities
maintain
public
trust
confidence
state
legitimate
interest
upholding
integrity
electoral
process
state
seeks
uphold
interest
restricting
speech
limitations
state
authority
imposed
first
amendment
manifestly
implicated
core
first
amendment
certain
basic
conceptions
manner
political
discussion
representative
democracy
proceed
noted
mills
alabama
whatever
differences
may
exist
interpretations
first
amendment
practically
universal
agreement
major
purpose
amendment
protect
free
discussion
governmental
affairs
course
includes
discussions
candidates
structures
forms
government
manner
government
operated
operated
matters
relating
political
processes
candidate
less
person
first
amendment
right
engage
discussion
public
issues
vigorously
tirelessly
advocate
election
election
candidates
indeed
particular
importance
candidates
unfettered
opportunity
make
views
known
electorate
may
intelligently
evaluate
candidates
personal
qualities
positions
vital
public
issues
choosing
among
election
day
justice
brandeis
observation
country
public
discussion
political
duty
whitney
california
concurring
opinion
applies
special
force
candidates
public
office
buckley
valeo
per
curiam
iii
face
prohibits
candidate
offering
material
benefits
voters
consideration
votes
conversely
prohibits
candidates
accepting
payments
consideration
manner
serve
public
function
sparks
boggs
placed
entirely
obvious
gloss
provision
respect
candidate
utterances
concerning
salaries
office
running
barring
candidate
promising
reduce
salary
salary
already
fixed
law
thus
consider
constitutionality
respect
proscription
evident
face
statute
light
particularized
concerns
suggested
sparks
gloss
discern
three
bases
upon
application
statute
brown
promise
might
conceivably
justified
first
prohibition
buying
votes
second
facilitating
candidacy
persons
lacking
independent
wealth
third
application
state
interests
prerogatives
respect
factual
misstatements
consider
possible
justifications
turn
first
sentence
prohibits
political
candidate
giving
promising
give
anything
value
voter
exchange
vote
support
many
possible
applications
provision
appear
present
little
constitutional
difficulty
state
may
surely
prohibit
candidate
buying
votes
body
politic
worthy
called
democracy
entrusts
selection
leaders
process
auction
barter
state
may
prohibit
giving
money
things
value
voter
exchange
support
may
also
declare
unlawful
agreement
embodying
intention
make
exchange
although
agreements
engage
illegal
conduct
undoubtedly
possess
element
association
state
may
ban
illegal
agreements
without
trenching
right
association
protected
first
amendment
fact
agreement
necessarily
takes
form
words
confer
upon
upon
underlying
conduct
constitutional
immunities
first
amendment
extends
speech
finally
solicitation
enter
agreement
arguably
crosses
sometimes
hazy
line
distinguishing
conduct
pure
speech
solicitation
even
though
may
impact
political
arena
remains
essence
invitation
engage
illegal
exchange
private
profit
may
properly
prohibited
see
hoffman
estates
flipside
hoffman
estates
central
hudson
gas
electric
public
service
pittsburgh
press
human
relations
thus
plain
kinds
promises
made
candidate
voters
kinds
promises
elicited
voters
candidates
may
declared
illegal
without
constitutional
difficulty
equally
plain
constitutional
limits
state
power
prohibit
candidates
making
promises
course
election
campaign
promises
universally
acknowledged
legitimate
indeed
indispensable
decisionmaking
democracy
first
national
bank
boston
bellotti
maintenance
opportunity
free
political
discussion
end
government
may
responsive
people
changes
may
obtained
lawful
means
fundamental
principle
constitutional
system
stromberg
california
candidate
commitments
enhance
accountability
government
officials
people
represent
assist
voters
predicting
effect
vote
fact
voters
may
find
reflected
candidate
commitment
place
commitment
beyond
reach
first
amendment
never
insisted
franchise
exercised
without
taint
individual
benefit
indeed
tradition
political
pluralism
partly
predicated
expectation
voters
pursue
individual
good
political
process
summation
individual
pursuits
collective
welfare
long
personal
benefit
achieved
normal
processes
government
private
arrangement
always
remains
reputable
basis
upon
cast
one
ballot
remains
determine
standards
might
distinguish
private
arrangements
inconsistent
democratic
government
candidate
assurances
promote
representative
foundation
political
system
hesitate
attempting
formulate
test
constitutional
legitimacy
precise
nature
promise
conditions
upon
given
circumstances
made
size
audience
nature
size
group
benefited
might
instance
varying
extents
bear
upon
constitutional
assessment
acknowledging
difficulty
rendering
concise
formulation
recognizing
possibility
borderline
cases
disable
us
identifying
cases
far
troublesome
border
clear
statements
petitioner
brown
course
august
press
conference
different
character
corrupting
agreements
solicitations
historically
recognized
unprotected
first
amendment
notably
brown
commitment
serve
reduced
salary
made
openly
subject
comment
criticism
political
opponent
scrutiny
voters
think
fact
statement
made
full
view
electorate
offers
strong
indication
statement
contained
nothing
fundamentally
odds
shared
political
ethic
kentucky
appeals
analogized
brown
promise
bribe
however
persuasive
analogy
might
matter
state
law
constitutional
basis
upon
brown
pledge
reduce
salary
might
equated
candidate
promise
pay
voters
support
pocketbook
although
upon
election
brown
undoubtedly
valid
claim
salary
fixed
law
brown
offer
voters
payment
personal
funds
declaration
intention
exercise
fiscal
powers
government
office
within
believed
albeit
erroneously
recognized
framework
office
least
outward
appearances
commitment
fully
accord
basic
understanding
legitimate
activity
government
body
implicit
monetary
benefit
individual
taxpayer
might
realized
public
officials
among
course
brown
approve
benefit
accordance
good
faith
exercise
public
duties
although
brown
may
incorrect
suggesting
salary
lawfully
reduced
transform
promise
invitation
engage
private
politically
corrupting
arrangement
addition
despite
kentucky
courts
characterization
promise
serve
reduced
salary
offer
reduce
pro
tanto
amount
taxes
individual
taxpayer
must
pay
thus
offer
voter
pecuniary
gain
app
impossible
discern
brown
generalized
commitment
invitation
enter
agreement
might
place
statement
outside
realm
unequivocal
protection
constitution
affords
political
speech
source
promised
benefit
public
fisc
benefit
extend
beyond
voters
cast
ballots
brown
taxpayers
citizens
even
brown
commitment
sense
deemed
offer
scarcely
contemplated
particularized
acceptance
quid
pro
quo
arrangement
honored
elected
conditioned
particular
vote
votes
entirely
majority
vote
sum
brown
offer
private
payment
donation
exchange
voter
support
brown
statement
construed
expression
intention
exercise
public
power
manner
believed
might
acceptable
class
citizens
brown
expressed
intention
individualized
appeal
taxpayers
felt
likely
beneficiaries
form
fiscal
restraint
fact
little
constitutional
significance
benefits
public
policy
changes
accrue
undifferentiated
public
directly
particular
individuals
groups
like
promise
lower
taxes
increase
efficiency
government
indeed
increase
taxes
order
provide
group
desired
public
benefit
public
service
brown
promise
reduce
salary
deemed
beyond
reach
first
amendment
considered
inviting
kind
corrupt
arrangement
appearance
state
may
compelling
interest
avoiding
see
buckley
valeo
state
may
insist
candidates
seeking
approval
electorate
work
within
framework
democratic
institutions
base
appeal
assertions
fitness
office
statements
respecting
means
intend
public
welfare
candidate
promise
confer
ultimate
benefit
voter
qua
taxpayers
citizen
member
general
public
lie
beyond
pale
first
amendment
protection
sparks
boggs
relied
part
interest
state
may
ensuring
willingness
persons
serve
public
office
without
remuneration
make
gratuitous
service
sine
qua
non
plausible
candidacy
state
might
legitimately
fear
emphasis
free
public
service
might
result
persons
independent
wealth
less
ability
chosen
though
better
qualified
afford
serve
reduced
salary
designed
interest
chooses
means
unacceptable
first
amendment
barring
certain
public
statements
respect
issue
state
ban
runs
directly
contrary
fundamental
premises
underlying
first
amendment
guardian
democracy
amendment
embodies
trust
free
exchange
ideas
means
people
choose
good
ideas
bad
candidates
political
office
state
fear
voters
might
make
choice
provide
state
compelling
justification
limiting
speech
simply
function
government
select
issues
worth
discussing
debating
police
department
chicago
mosley
course
political
campaign
amicus
points
applied
sparks
boggs
supra
bars
promises
serve
reduced
salary
salary
official
fixed
law
promise
therefore
delivered
course
demonstrable
falsehoods
protected
first
amendment
manner
truthful
statements
gertz
robert
welch
erroneous
statement
inevitable
free
debate
must
protected
freedoms
expression
breathing
space
need
survive
new
york
times
sullivan
quoting
naacp
button
section
applied
case
afforded
requisite
breathing
space
commonwealth
kentucky
provided
candidate
public
office
forfeits
electoral
victory
errs
announcing
elected
serve
reduced
salary
kentucky
courts
made
clear
case
candidate
liability
error
absolute
election
victory
must
voided
even
offending
statement
made
good
faith
quickly
repudiated
chilling
effect
absolute
accountability
factual
misstatements
course
political
debate
incompatible
atmosphere
free
discussion
contemplated
first
amendment
context
political
campaigns
see
monitor
patriot
roy
ocala
damron
although
state
interest
protecting
political
process
distortions
caused
untrue
inaccurate
speech
somewhat
different
state
interest
protecting
individuals
defamatory
falsehoods
principles
underlying
first
amendment
remain
paramount
whenever
compatible
underlying
interests
stake
regime
amendment
depend
correction
conscience
judges
juries
competition
ideas
gertz
robert
welch
supra
political
campaign
candidate
factual
blunder
unlikely
escape
notice
correction
erring
candidate
political
opponent
preferred
first
amendment
remedy
speech
enforced
silence
whitney
california
brandeis
concurring
thus
special
force
cf
gertz
robert
welch
supra
showing
case
petitioner
made
disputed
statement
good
faith
without
knowledge
falsity
made
statement
reckless
disregard
whether
false
moreover
petitioner
retracted
statement
promptly
discovering
might
false
circumstances
nullifying
petitioner
election
victory
inconsistent
atmosphere
robust
political
debate
protected
first
amendment
iv
conclude
applied
case
limit
speech
violation
first
amendment
reverse
judgment
kentucky
appeals
remand
proceedings
inconsistent
opinion
ordered
footnotes
brown
echoed
running
mate
call
fiscal
restraint
two
proposals
cutting
salaries
reorganizing
commissioner
office
staff
save
taxpayers
term
office
make
statements
fully
aware
office
intend
occupy
set
tone
type
public
officials
intend
guidance
extravagance
public
expense
thing
past
responsibility
integrity
watchwords
progress
cooperation
theme
app
hartlage
received
total
votes
brown
received
votes
certificate
election
provision
amended
replace
word
demand
last
clause
word
require
acts
ch
kentucky
law
equity
action
contest
election
may
maintained
candidate
received
number
votes
cast
successful
candidate
rev
stat
kentucky
corrupt
practices
act
identifies
violation
proper
basis
contest
provides
violation
corrupt
practices
act
contestant
others
behalf
knowledge
appears
appears
provisions
violated
contestee
others
behalf
knowledge
nomination
election
contestee
shall
declared
void
rev
stat
appeals
noted
kentucky
law
salaries
county
officers
elected
popular
vote
shall
set
fiscal
later
first
monday
may
year
officers
elected
compensation
officer
shall
changed
term
brown
promised
act
legally
app
quoting
rev
stat
see
const
quoted
following
extract
sparks
describing
rationale
underlying
statute
application
statements
brown
agreement
candidate
office
chosen
discharge
duties
office
without
compensation
lesser
compensation
provided
law
pay
part
salary
public
treasury
illegal
whether
made
good
faith
underlying
principle
candidate
offers
discharge
duties
elective
office
less
salary
fixed
law
salary
must
paid
taxation
offers
reduce
pro
tanto
amount
taxes
individual
taxpayer
must
pay
thus
makes
offer
voter
pecuniary
gain
quoting
public
officers
appears
us
escape
conclusion
promise
take
reduction
salary
set
law
elective
public
office
agreement
discharge
duties
office
gratis
advanced
one
induce
votes
candidacy
vicious
tendency
constitute
violation
corrupt
practices
act
app
see
federalist
madisonian
democratic
tradition
extolled
system
political
pluralism
private
interest
every
individual
may
sentinel
public
rights
federalist
lodge
ed
also
contemplated
within
tradition
individual
may
perceive
interest
according
public
good
extended
republic
among
great
variety
interests
parties
sects
embraces
coalition
majority
whole
society
seldom
take
place
principles
justice
general
good
explained
kentucky
appeals
hold
otherwise
permit
various
elective
public
offices
become
filled
purchase
election
thereto
making
extravagant
bid
auction
method
choosing
public
officer
supplant
personal
fitness
test
eventually
public
offices
occupied
opulent
afford
serve
without
pay
ambitious
serve
pittance
honor
attached
office
designing
grafter
surely
obtain
remuneration
methods
bear
scrutiny
system
good
government
certainly
vanish
every
subdivision
state
theory
popular
government
worthy
hold
offices
personal
fitness
included
moral
character
intellectual
ability
social
standing
habits
life
political
convictions
single
test
law
recognize
throws
considerations
scale
extent
tends
weaken
power
personal
fitness
tolerated
tends
turn
away
thought
voter
one
question
paramount
mind
deposits
ballot
spirit
least
bribery
insidious
therefore
dangerous
grosser
form
directly
offering
money
voter
state
address
concern
prohibiting
reduction
public
official
salary
term
office
kentucky
done
see
supra
prohibition
offend
first
amendment
note
passing
along
proposed
articles
upon
ratification
became
first
amendments
constitution
others
proposed
articles
ii
ratified
article
ii
provided
law
varying
compensation
services
senators
representatives
shall
take
effect
election
representatives
shall
intervened
justice
rehnquist
concurring
result
agree
provision
kentucky
corrupt
practices
act
discussed
opinion
impermissibly
limits
freedom
speech
part
political
candidates
violation
first
fourteenth
amendments
constitution
different
facts
think
give
weight
state
interest
preventing
corruption
elections
unable
join
analogy
laws
state
defamation
laws
think
mills
alabama
affords
ample
basis
reaching
result
arrives
see
need
rely
precedents
involve
state
efforts
regulate
electoral
process