ballard
argued
october
decided
december
roland
rich
woolley
ralph
curren
los
angeles
petitioners
miss
beatrice
rosenberg
washington
respondent
justice
douglas
delivered
opinion
case
second
time
involves
indictment
conviction
respondents
using
conspiring
use
mails
defraud
criminal
code
criminal
code
fraudulent
scheme
charged
promotion
movement
alleged
fraudulent
religious
organization
use
mails
nature
movement
facts
surrounding
origin
growth
summarized
prior
opinion
sufficient
say
petitioners
found
guilty
charge
trial
judge
withheld
jury
questions
concerning
truth
falsity
religious
beliefs
doctrines
circuit
appeals
reversed
granted
new
trial
holding
error
withhold
questions
jury
turn
reversed
circuit
appeals
sustained
district
ruling
petitioners
argued
however
even
though
circuit
appeals
erred
reversing
judgment
conviction
ground
action
justified
distinct
grounds
circuit
appeals
passed
questions
benefit
views
accordingly
deemed
appropriate
remand
cause
might
first
pass
questions
reserved
remand
circuit
appeals
one
judge
dissenting
affirmed
judgment
conviction
without
discussion
issues
raised
petition
rehearing
denied
circuit
appeals
filed
opinion
discussed
questions
reserved
granted
petition
certiorari
serious
questions
concerning
administration
criminal
justice
raised
met
outset
concession
women
included
panel
grand
petit
jurors
southern
district
california
indictment
returned
trial
intentionally
systematically
excluded
panel
issue
raised
motion
quash
indictment
challenge
array
petit
jurors
intentional
systematic
exclusion
women
panel
motions
denied
denial
assigned
error
appeal
jury
question
issue
stage
proceedings
except
first
time
case
us
time
point
assigned
argued
case
instance
instance
present
petitioners
said
issues
case
obscured
question
brought
passed
upon
argued
consequently
remanded
case
consideration
remaining
issues
circuit
appeals
jury
issue
argued
circuit
appeals
hold
waived
passed
upon
issue
concluding
error
exclusion
women
panel
page
see
dissent
page
circumstances
say
government
suggest
petitioners
lost
right
urge
question
moreover
case
reynolds
error
though
presented
first
argument
appears
face
record
us
see
sibbach
wilson
congress
provided
jurors
federal
shall
qualifications
highest
law
state
judicial
code
criminal
code
provision
applies
grand
well
petit
juries
congress
also
prohibited
disqualification
citizens
jury
service
account
race
color
previous
condition
servitude
required
jurors
shall
chosen
reference
party
affiliations
provided
jurors
shall
returned
parts
district
may
direct
favorable
impartial
trial
incur
unnecessary
expense
unduly
burden
citizens
part
none
specific
created
along
lines
sex
provisions
reflect
design
make
jury
community
truly
representative
glasser
california
women
eligible
jury
service
local
law
code
civil
procedure
system
jury
selection
congress
adopted
contemplated
therefore
juries
federal
courts
sitting
representative
sexes
women
excluded
half
available
population
drawn
upon
jury
service
put
matter
another
way
congress
referred
state
law
merely
determine
qualified
act
juror
whether
method
selecting
jury
federal
qualified
proper
question
federal
law
glasser
supra
pages
pages
thiel
southern
pacific
presented
similar
problem
civil
case
removed
district
ground
diversity
citizenship
involved
question
liability
common
carrier
passenger
persons
worked
daily
wage
deliberately
intentionally
excluded
jury
lists
held
exercise
power
supervision
administration
justice
federal
courts
see
mcnabb
plaintiff
motion
strike
panel
granted
gist
ruling
contained
following
statement
opinion
thiel
case
american
tradition
trial
jury
considered
connection
either
cr
minal
civil
proceedings
necessarily
contemplates
impartial
jury
drawn
community
mean
course
every
jury
must
contain
representatives
economic
social
religious
racial
political
geographical
groups
community
frequently
complete
representation
impossible
mean
tive
jurors
shall
selected
officials
without
systematic
intentional
exclusion
groups
recognition
must
given
fact
eligible
jury
service
found
every
stratum
society
jury
competence
individual
rather
group
class
matter
fact
lies
heart
jury
system
disregard
open
door
class
distinctions
dicriminations
abhorrent
democratic
ideals
trial
jury
conclude
purposeful
systematic
exclusion
women
panel
case
departure
scheme
jury
selection
congress
adopted
thiel
case
exercise
power
supervision
administration
justice
federal
courts
mcnabb
supra
correct
error
permeated
proceeding
said
however
male
panel
drawn
various
groups
within
community
truly
representative
women
included
thought
factors
tend
influence
action
women
influence
action
personality
background
economic
sex
yet
enough
say
women
sitting
jurors
neither
act
tend
act
class
men
likewise
act
class
shoe
foot
claim
jury
truly
representative
community
men
intentionally
systematically
excluded
panel
truth
two
sexes
fungible
community
made
exclusively
one
different
community
composed
subtle
interplay
influence
one
among
imponderables
insulate
courtroom
either
may
given
case
make
iota
difference
yet
flavor
distinct
quality
lost
either
sex
excluded
exclusion
one
may
indeed
make
jury
less
representative
community
true
economic
racial
group
excluded
present
case
involves
prosecution
mother
son
promotion
allegedly
fraudulent
religious
program
judge
denman
dissent
stated
average
family
jurors
drawn
souls
children
infant
early
adolescent
bodies
receive
first
lasting
teaching
religious
truths
mothers
families
major
social
function
men
concerned
creation
material
things
largely
food
clothing
housing
children
bodies
public
schools
per
cent
primary
grammar
school
teachers
women
churches
religions
numbers
women
attendants
divine
service
vastly
exceed
men
one
large
vital
religious
group
created
america
since
joseph
smith
christian
scientists
founded
woman
mary
baker
eddy
matters
viewpoint
testimony
conspiracy
mean
vile
warrants
strongest
strictures
prosecution
woman
juror
sitting
ballard
trial
mother
five
children
whose
knee
instilled
teachings
jesus
interpreted
eddy
sensitive
woman
highly
spiritual
character
rationalize
money
income
acquired
ballard
devoted
teachings
jesus
profits
trust
created
eddy
christian
science
monitor
pages
point
illustrates
exclusion
women
jury
panels
may
times
highly
prejudicial
defendants
reversible
error
depend
showing
prejudice
individual
case
evil
lies
admitted
exclusion
eligible
class
group
community
disregard
prescribed
standards
jury
selection
systematic
intentional
exclusion
women
like
exclusion
racial
group
smith
texas
economic
social
class
thiel
southern
pacific
supra
deprives
jury
system
broad
base
designed
congress
democratic
society
departure
statutory
scheme
well
stated
roemig
action
operative
destory
basic
democracy
classlessness
jury
personnel
accord
defendant
type
jury
law
entitles
administrative
denial
right
lawmakers
seen
fit
withhold
actually
guaranteed
cf
kotteakos
injury
limited
injury
jury
system
law
institution
community
large
democratic
ideal
reflected
processes
courts
thiel
case
merely
instance
petit
jury
drawn
improper
panel
remand
cause
new
trial
said
grand
jury
likewise
drawn
panel
improperly
chosen
therefore
indictment
returned
accordance
procedure
established
congress
accordingly
indictment
must
dismissed
disposing
case
ground
reach
issues
urged
suggested
limiting
opinion
prolong
already
lengthy
proceeding
told
petitioners
us
determination
questions
left
undecided
know
assume
speculative
may
may
present
new
charges
framed
within
limits
earlier
opinion
properly
constituted
grand
jury
may
may
return
new
indictments
petitioners
may
may
convicted
second
time
reversed
justice
jackson
concurring
concur
result
quite
different
reasons
join
opinions
justice
frankfurter
justice
burton
effect
direct
dismissal
indictment
upon
jury
question
opinion
point
either
abandoned
parties
ignored
silently
rejected
prior
decision
revived
therefore
reach
issues
case
direct
dismissal
indictment
upon
grounds
stated
dissent
ballard
page
page
ground
previously
ruled
improper
trial
inquire
whether
religious
professions
experiences
represented
defendants
true
false
inquire
whether
represented
without
belief
truth
leaves
statutory
basis
conviction
fraud
especially
basis
conviction
indictment
requires
opinion
provably
false
representation
addition
knowledge
falsity
make
iminal
mail
fraud
since
trial
allowed
make
findings
indictment
dismissed
justice
frankfurter
chief
justice
justice
jackson
justice
burton
concur
dissenting
exercise
supervisory
power
lower
federal
courts
directing
dismissal
indictment
case
following
practice
prevailing
federal
district
california
women
included
panel
grand
jury
found
indictment
brother
burton
demonstrates
believe
circumstances
absence
women
grand
jury
panel
vitiate
indictment
event
authority
supervise
practice
lower
federal
courts
exercised
vindicate
appropriate
standards
judicial
administration
finding
exclusion
women
grand
jury
panel
fatal
indictment
embraces
claim
benefit
petitioners
abandoned
four
years
ago
since
women
excluded
jury
service
california
federal
courts
since
justify
action
means
emphasizing
lower
courts
duty
adopting
proper
practice
thus
directs
dismissal
indictment
circumstances
action
advance
proper
administration
criminal
justice
defendants
fully
cognizant
facts
issues
involved
made
objection
composition
grand
jury
panel
abandoned
objected
array
district
saved
point
objection
overruled
assigned
one
errors
tions
appeal
circuit
appeals
ample
time
defendants
rely
circuit
appeals
decided
glasser
indicated
deemed
important
jury
selected
may
described
modern
democratic
basis
yet
point
made
overruled
district
argued
briefs
circuit
appeals
although
defendants
vigorously
urged
claims
reverse
convictions
fact
jury
question
issue
circuit
appeals
sense
assigned
error
neither
briefed
argued
serves
emphasize
abandonment
issue
government
petition
case
came
defendants
surely
pressed
every
claim
seemed
relevant
sustain
judgment
circuit
appeals
entered
favor
well
settled
require
citation
cases
respondent
may
urge
support
ground
judgment
favor
sustained
whether
argued
briefs
oral
argument
vigorously
urged
issues
going
validity
indictment
exclusion
women
even
mentioned
full
record
took
notice
question
found
undermine
entire
proceedings
remanded
case
circuit
appeals
plainly
decide
questions
argued
left
undecided
hardly
invited
decision
questions
abandoned
argued
procedural
point
ever
abandoned
objection
jury
panels
abandoned
glasser
opinion
point
properly
preserved
appeal
papers
abandonment
issue
petitioners
case
came
circuit
appeals
later
us
mean
confidence
claim
event
hur
deemed
fatal
error
hardly
helps
proper
administration
criminal
justice
allow
defendants
resurrect
point
dropped
four
years
earlier
even
find
exclusion
women
constitutes
inroad
vital
safeguards
criminal
trial
involve
denial
due
process
orders
dismissal
indictment
past
practice
pursued
good
faith
misapprehension
relevant
law
misconception
corrected
proper
practice
enforced
since
order
serve
means
ensuring
charge
federal
practice
change
already
taken
place
dismissal
indictment
put
end
prosecution
offenses
charges
event
relieve
duty
deciding
central
issue
us
namely
whether
mails
may
used
obtain
money
fraud
final
consists
false
claim
belief
touching
religion
dismissal
indictment
terminate
prosecution
offenses
congress
act
may
stat
amended
july
stat
expressly
saved
prosecution
act
congress
allowed
reindictment
indictment
found
defective
basis
prosecution
left
untouched
amended
provides
indictment
found
defective
insufficient
cause
period
prescribed
applicable
statute
limitations
expired
new
indictment
may
returned
later
end
next
succeeding
regular
term
following
term
indictment
found
defective
insufficient
grand
jury
thereof
shall
session
considering
history
litigation
reasonable
assumption
gove
nment
press
prosecution
conviction
circuit
appeals
reversed
ordered
new
trial
petition
government
brought
case
government
urged
judgment
conviction
restored
defendants
challenged
foundation
invoking
constitutional
guaranty
freedom
religion
april
reversed
circuit
appeals
found
district
properly
jury
questions
concerning
truth
falsity
religious
beliefs
doctrines
respondents
page
page
case
remanded
circuit
appeals
without
considering
question
whether
first
amendment
affords
immunity
criminal
prosecution
procurement
money
false
statements
one
religious
experiences
three
justices
concluded
verdict
stand
opinion
late
chief
justice
denied
first
amendment
afforded
immunity
fraudulent
use
mails
simply
false
statements
concerned
religious
beliefs
fourth
justice
likewise
thought
issue
met
concluded
indictment
dismissed
raised
issues
inextricably
bound
traditional
liberty
sustained
view
first
amendment
upon
remand
circuit
appeals
considering
issues
impliedly
remitted
found
flaw
jury
verdict
affirmed
conviction
three
years
case
main
issue
urged
argument
extensive
briefs
power
government
maintain
prosecution
view
first
amendment
decision
merely
directing
dismissal
indictment
error
selection
grand
jury
found
inevitably
lead
curing
defect
resubmission
properly
selected
grand
jury
hardly
believed
government
feel
duty
whole
machinery
criminal
justice
set
motion
trial
follow
district
naturally
deem
bound
entertain
prosecution
view
decision
circuit
appeals
twice
left
undisturbed
rejected
claim
based
religious
liberty
much
like
playing
justice
await
third
review
two
three
years
hence
facing
issue
explicitly
doctrine
constitutional
claim
prematurely
considered
vital
feature
harmonious
functioning
scheme
government
rule
founded
reason
mechanical
formula
avoiding
aspect
litigation
fairly
decided
without
meeting
constitutional
issue
controversy
really
disposed
merely
finding
grand
jury
improperly
selected
abstention
constitutional
adjudication
imperative
case
prosecution
barred
statute
limitations
act
seen
removes
bar
sanctions
reindictment
anticipated
view
circumstances
litigation
escape
responsibility
dealing
merely
remediable
invalidity
indictment
leaving
untouched
decision
circuit
appeals
prosecution
valid
course
defendants
might
acquitted
new
trial
purports
exercise
supervisory
authority
interests
administration
criminal
justice
permit
waste
unfairness
involved
new
trial
foundation
especially
claim
proper
administration
justice
case
courts
almost
six
years
starting
new
round
result
decision
short
prosecution
ill
continue
unless
terminate
terminate
deem
beyond
constitutional
authority
prosecution
charges
upon
jury
found
defendants
guilty
circuit
appeals
sustained
give
implied
sanction
continuance
prosecution
mean
withholding
view
issue
inescapable
full
disposition
controversy
candor
repels
requirements
constitutional
adjudication
justify
justice
burton
dissenting
altough
concur
policy
requiring
inclusion
federal
jury
lists
california
women
qualified
service
jurors
highest
law
state
believe
justified
dismissing
indictment
returned
case
merely
women
included
lists
time
absence
binding
statutory
rule
requiring
inclusion
women
district
compelled
exercise
discretion
including
excluding
without
depending
breadth
discretion
allowed
district
circumstances
submit
reasons
district
action
strengthen
position
retroactively
disapprove
established
local
federal
practice
conformed
almost
exactly
established
state
practice
ever
since
first
judicature
act
congress
subordinated
federal
practice
state
law
determining
qualifications
federal
jurors
act
said
jurors
shall
qualifications
requisite
jurors
laws
state
citizens
serve
highest
courts
law
state
section
act
september
stat
similarly
present
law
reads
serve
courts
state
respectively
shall
qualifications
subject
provisions
hereinafter
contained
entitled
exemptions
jurors
highest
law
state
may
entitled
time
jurors
service
courts
summoned
section
judicial
code
stat
constitutional
statutory
rule
policy
requiring
women
placed
federal
jury
lists
congress
might
required
course
might
set
complete
federal
qualifications
federal
jurors
never
done
instead
provided
state
action
shall
determine
qualifications
federal
jury
service
result
reversible
error
federal
courts
include
women
federal
juries
make
women
eligible
service
jurors
highest
law
cf
crowley
inescapable
recognition
congress
sees
nothing
seriously
prejudicial
continued
use
exclusively
male
federal
juries
women
eligible
state
jury
duty
availability
appropriate
accommodations
two
sexes
treated
material
factor
determining
whether
women
men
shall
called
jury
duty
acts
resolves
people
shannon
cal
see
report
judicial
conference
committee
selection
jurors
subordination
need
women
federal
juries
availability
physical
accommodations
tacit
recognition
fundamental
infraction
rights
litigants
involved
continuance
exclusively
male
juries
employments
women
distinguished
men
matter
law
connection
hours
conditions
work
west
coast
hotel
parrish
distinctions
due
considerations
applicable
jury
service
general
increasing
absence
sound
reasons
distinctions
men
women
matters
suffrage
office
holding
education
economic
status
civil
liberties
church
membership
cultural
activities
even
war
service
emphasizes
lack
reason
making
point
presence
absence
either
sex
either
grand
petit
juries
see
miller
woman
juror
general
practice
calling
women
jury
duty
although
eligible
duty
state
courts
california
effect
granted
women
substantial
exemption
duty
people
parman
people
shannon
supra
see
ballard
california
courts
thus
treated
men
women
equally
qualified
assumed
litigants
adequate
impartial
jury
regardless
sex
jurors
provided
jurors
otherwise
qualified
serve
cf
hyde
agnew
state
practice
binding
upon
federal
courts
matter
law
yet
persuasive
indicating
litigants
need
treated
prejudiced
federal
district
conformed
practice
state
state
rule
see
people
parman
supra
mana
cal
people
manuel
error
federal
practice
exclusion
women
exclusion
permitted
required
federal
statute
eligible
state
jury
duty
error
must
consist
failure
require
listing
women
well
men
federal
jury
service
state
permits
listing
state
jury
service
even
though
state
regards
listing
directory
mandatory
upon
state
courts
ample
grounds
distinguishing
thiel
southern
pacific
case
example
thiel
case
acted
absence
actual
notice
objectionable
practice
whereas
notice
practice
objected
changed
two
years
ago
conform
least
substantially
approved
practice
also
thiel
case
procedure
complained
consisted
exclusion
economic
group
thereby
detracting
representative
character
jury
list
manner
contrary
tradition
purpose
jury
system
exclusion
women
jury
service
accordance
traditional
practice
accordance
congressionally
approved
future
practice
federal
state
courts
shows
objectionable
practice
state
established
directory
system
eligibility
women
state
jury
service
federal
enlarge
policy
mandatory
requirement
qualified
women
placed
upon
federal
jury
lists
reasons
unable
concur
judgment
setting
aside
indictment
verdict
convictions
case
affirmed
concur
statement
chief
justice
stone
none
respondents
constitutional
rights
violated
prosecuted
fraudulent
procurement
money
false
representations
beliefs
religious
otherwise
ballard
chief
justice
justice
frankfurter
join
dissent
justice
jackson
joins
except
far
final
paragraph
relates
affirmance
convictions
footnotes
women
members
grand
petit
juries
district
since
beginning
february
term
see
chaplin
thus
judicial
code
provides
drawing
jurors
grand
petit
persons
qualifications
prescribed
judicial
code
judicial
code
judicial
code
person
shall
serve
petit
juror
one
term
year
judicial
code
artificers
workmen
employed
armories
arsenals
exempted
service
jurors
cf
judicial
code
dealing
disqualifications
jurors
prosecutions
bigamy
polygamy
unlawful
cohabitation
report
judicial
conference
committee
selection
jurors
earlier
indictment
subsequently
dismissed
returned
petitioners
moved
quash
exclusion
women
panel
grand
jurors
motion
denied
ballard
ruling
seems
influenced
thought
california
law
determined
whether
exclusion
women
resulted
proper
jury
california
law
inclusion
women
panel
obligatory
statutory
provisions
qualify
jury
service
directory
people
shannon
cal
people
parman
see
miller
woman
juror
oregon
cf
carson
women
jurors
problem
reflected
discussions
androcentric
theory
gynaecocentric
theory
scientific
literature
see
ward
pure
sociology
ch
xiv
draper
et
human
constitution
clinical
medicine
ch
vi
cf
wuichet
two
cases
invoked
inapposite
circumstances
reynolds
different
us
action
case
afford
support
done
affirming
conviction
noticed
sentence
imposed
trial
imprisonment
hard
labor
whereas
applicable
statute
authorized
sentence
ordinary
imprisonment
called
attention
kind
error
notice
error
everybody
overlooked
uncorrected
subjected
defendant
punishment
far
severe
authorized
congress
case
us
error
may
goes
procedural
point
bearing
fairness
trial
conviction
sentence
result
action
procedural
point
vitiate
entire
proceeding
merely
remand
formal
resentencing
reynolds
case
also
reynolds
case
noted
error
indicated
petition
rehearing
term
previously
indicated
evidently
previously
noted
anyone
make
way
surface
duly
vigorously
urged
assigned
error
dropped
buried
three
years
resurrected
afterthought
makeweight
argument
merits
sibbach
wilson
district
sought
punish
contempt
action
specifically
exempt
punishment
error
nature
apparently
noticed
pressed
defendants
first
time
case
came
considered
point
case
reappears
tail
another
issue
three
years
record
containing
alleged
error
first
came
us
federal
courts
therefore
bound
state
definitions
jurors
qualifications
subject
federal
constitutional
statutory
limitations
argued
fifth
sixth
amendments
constitution
guarantee
continuance
exclusively
male
common
law
federal
juries
generally
agreed
women
qualified
serve
federal
juries
wherever
declared
qualified
jurors
highest
law
respective
see
wood
tynan
certiorari
denied
hoxie
certiorari
denied
appears
however
beginning
practice
objected
thiel
case
discontinued
louis
goddman
district
judge
federal
jury
selections
affected
thiel
southern
pacific
company
journal
state
bar
california