nobles
argued
april
decided
june
respondent
federal
criminal
trial
resulted
conviction
defense
counsel
sought
impeach
credibility
key
prosecution
witnesses
testimony
defense
investigator
regarding
statements
previously
obtained
witnesses
investigator
investigator
called
witness
district
stated
copy
investigator
report
inspected
edited
camera
excise
references
matters
relevant
statements
submitted
prosecution
inspection
completion
investigator
testimony
defense
counsel
said
intend
produce
report
ruled
investigator
testify
interviews
witnesses
appeals
considering
ruling
reversible
error
held
fifth
amendment
fed
rule
crim
proc
prohibited
disclosure
condition
imposed
held
proper
case
prosecution
well
defense
invoke
federal
judiciary
inherent
power
require
production
previously
recorded
witness
statements
facilitate
full
disclosure
relevant
facts
investigator
report
might
provide
critical
insight
issues
credibility
investigator
testimony
raise
hence
highly
relevant
issues
pp
fifth
amendment
privilege
compulsory
personal
defendant
extend
testimony
statements
third
parties
called
witnesses
trial
instance
fact
statements
third
parties
elicited
defense
investigator
respondent
behalf
convert
respondent
personal
communications
requiring
production
sense
compel
respondent
witness
extort
communications
pp
rule
whose
language
history
indicate
addresses
pretrial
discovery
imposes
constraint
district
power
condition
impeachment
testimony
respondent
witness
production
relevant
portions
report
fact
rule
incorporates
jencks
act
limitation
shows
contrary
intent
convert
rule
general
limitation
trial
broad
discretion
evidentiary
questions
trial
pp
qualified
privilege
derived
attorney
doctrine
available
prevent
disclosure
investigative
report
since
respondent
electing
present
investigator
witness
waived
privilege
respect
matters
covered
testimony
pp
within
district
discretion
assure
jury
hear
investigator
full
testimony
rather
truncated
portion
favorable
respondent
ruling
contrary
respondent
contention
deprive
sixth
amendment
rights
compulsory
process
amendment
confer
right
present
testimony
free
legitimate
demands
adversarial
system
invoked
justification
presenting
might
pp
powell
delivered
opinion
burger
brennan
stewart
marshall
blackmun
joined
parts
ii
iii
white
rehnquist
joined
white
filed
concurring
opinion
rehnquist
joined
post
douglas
took
part
consideration
decision
case
paul
friedman
argued
cause
briefs
solicitor
general
bork
acting
assistant
attorney
general
keeney
deputy
solicitor
general
frey
sidney
glazer
ivan
michael
schaeffer
nicholas
allis
argued
cause
respondent
brief
john
van
de
kamp
briefs
amici
curiae
urging
affirmance
filed
john
cleary
california
public
defenders
assn
et
federal
public
defender
new
jersey
justice
powell
delivered
opinion
criminal
trial
defense
counsel
sought
impeach
credibility
key
prosecution
witnesses
testimony
defense
investigator
regarding
statements
previously
obtained
witnesses
investigator
question
presented
whether
circumstances
federal
trial
may
compel
defense
reveal
relevant
portions
investigator
report
prosecution
use
appeals
ninth
circuit
concluded
granted
certiorari
reverse
respondent
tried
convicted
charges
arising
armed
robbery
federally
insured
bank
significant
evidence
linking
crime
identification
testimony
two
witnesses
bank
teller
salesman
bank
robbery
respondent
offered
alibi
appeals
recognized
strongest
defense
centered
around
attempts
discredit
eyewitnesses
defense
efforts
impeach
gave
rise
events
led
decision
course
preparing
respondent
defense
investigator
defense
interviewed
witnesses
preserved
essence
conversations
written
report
witnesses
testified
prosecution
respondent
counsel
relied
report
conducting
counsel
asked
bank
teller
whether
recalled
told
investigator
seen
back
man
identified
respondent
witness
replied
remember
making
statement
allowed
despite
defense
counsel
initial
objection
refresh
recollection
referring
portion
investigator
report
prosecutor
also
allowed
see
briefly
relevant
portion
report
witness
thereafter
testified
although
report
indicated
told
investigator
seen
respondent
back
fact
seen
continued
insist
respondent
bank
robber
witness
acknowledged
spoken
defense
investigator
respondent
counsel
twice
inquired
whether
told
investigator
blacks
looked
alike
instance
witness
denied
made
statement
prosecution
sought
inspection
relevant
portion
investigator
report
respondent
counsel
objected
declined
order
disclosure
time
ruled
required
investigator
testified
witnesses
alleged
statements
witness
stand
advised
examine
investigator
report
camera
excise
reference
matters
relevant
precise
statements
issue
prosecution
completed
case
respondent
called
investigator
defense
witness
reiterated
copy
report
inspected
edited
camera
submitted
government
counsel
completion
investigator
impeachment
testimony
respondent
counsel
stated
intend
produce
report
ruled
investigator
allowed
testify
interviews
witnesses
appeals
ninth
circuit
acknowledging
trial
ruling
constituted
limited
seemingly
judicious
restriction
nevertheless
considered
reversible
error
citing
wright
app
found
fifth
amendment
prohibited
disclosure
condition
imposed
case
held
fed
rule
crim
proc
framed
exclusively
terms
pretrial
discovery
precluded
prosecutorial
discovery
trial
well
accord
wright
supra
respect
think
erred
ii
dual
aim
criminal
justice
system
guilt
shall
escape
innocence
suffer
berger
end
placed
confidence
adversary
system
entrusting
primary
responsibility
developing
relevant
facts
determination
guilt
innocence
made
see
nixon
williams
florida
elkins
frankfurter
dissenting
adversary
system
depends
primarily
parties
presentation
exploration
relevant
facts
judiciary
limited
role
referee
supervisor
compulsory
processes
stand
available
require
presentation
evidence
grand
jury
nixon
supra
kastigar
murphy
waterfront
white
concurring
recently
observed
nixon
supra
elected
employ
adversary
system
criminal
justice
parties
contest
issues
law
need
develop
relevant
facts
adversary
system
fundamental
comprehensive
ends
criminal
justice
defeated
judgments
founded
partial
speculative
presentation
facts
integrity
judicial
system
public
confidence
system
depend
full
disclosure
facts
within
framework
rules
evidence
ensure
justice
done
imperative
function
courts
compulsory
process
available
production
evidence
needed
either
prosecution
defense
case
defense
proposed
call
investigator
impeach
identification
testimony
prosecution
eyewitnesses
evident
investigator
testify
witness
recollection
appearance
individual
identified
respondent
considerably
less
clear
earlier
time
trial
also
appeared
investigator
one
witness
differed
even
witness
told
interview
investigator
contemporaneous
report
might
provide
critical
insight
issues
credibility
investigator
testimony
raise
assist
jury
determining
extent
investigator
testimony
actually
discredited
prosecution
witnesses
example
report
failed
mention
purported
statement
one
witness
blacks
looked
alike
jury
might
disregard
investigator
version
altogether
hand
statement
appeared
contemporaneously
recorded
report
tend
strongly
corroborate
investigator
version
interview
diminish
substantially
reliability
witness
identification
therefore
apparent
trial
judge
investigator
report
highly
relevant
critical
issue
credibility
context
production
report
might
substantially
enhance
search
truth
williams
florida
must
determine
whether
compelling
production
precluded
privilege
available
defense
circumstances
case
iii
appeals
concluded
fifth
amendment
renders
criminal
discovery
basically
oneway
street
like
many
generalizations
constitutional
law
one
broad
relationship
accused
fifth
amendment
rights
prosecution
ability
discover
materials
trial
must
identified
discriminating
manner
fifth
amendment
privilege
compulsory
intimate
personal
one
protects
private
inner
sanctum
individual
feeling
thought
proscribes
state
intrusion
extract
couch
see
also
bellis
white
noted
couch
supra
privilege
personal
privilege
adheres
basically
person
information
may
incriminate
instance
disclosure
relevant
portions
defense
investigator
report
impinge
fundamental
values
protected
fifth
amendment
order
limited
statements
allegedly
made
third
parties
available
witnesses
prosecution
defense
respondent
prepare
report
suggestion
portions
subject
disclosure
order
reflected
information
conveyed
investigator
fact
statements
third
parties
elicited
defense
investigator
respondent
behalf
convert
respondent
personal
communications
requiring
production
investigator
therefore
sense
compel
respondent
witness
extort
communications
thus
conclude
fifth
amendment
privilege
compulsory
personal
defendant
extend
testimony
statements
third
parties
called
witnesses
trial
appeals
reliance
constitutional
guarantee
bar
disclosure
ordered
misplaced
appeals
also
held
fed
rule
crim
proc
deprived
trial
power
order
disclosure
relevant
portions
investigator
report
acknowledging
rule
appears
control
pretrial
discovery
nonetheless
determined
reference
jencks
act
signaled
intention
rule
control
trial
practice
well
agree
language
history
rule
indicate
addresses
pretrial
discovery
rule
requires
motion
discovery
filed
within
days
arraignment
reasonable
later
time
may
permit
commands
include
relief
sought
movant
provision
viewed
light
advisory
committee
admonition
designed
encourage
promptness
filing
enable
district
avoid
unnecessary
delay
multiplication
motions
see
advisory
committee
notes
rule
pretrial
focus
rule
becomes
apparent
government
right
discovery
arises
defendant
successfully
sought
discovery
subsections
confined
matters
defendant
intends
produce
trial
fed
rule
crim
proc
hardly
suggests
intention
rule
limit
power
order
production
trial
begun
finally
advisory
committee
notes
emphasize
pretrial
character
notes
repeatedly
characterize
rule
provision
governing
pretrial
disclosure
never
suggesting
intended
constrict
district
control
evidentiary
questions
arising
trial
pp
incorporation
jencks
act
limitation
pretrial
right
discovery
provided
rule
express
contrary
intent
restricts
defendant
right
pretrial
discovery
manner
reconciles
provision
jencks
act
limitation
trial
discretion
evidentiary
matters
certainly
convert
rule
general
limitation
trial
broad
discretion
evidentiary
questions
trial
cf
giles
maryland
fortas
concurring
judgment
conclude
therefore
rule
imposes
constraint
district
power
condition
impeachment
testimony
respondent
witness
production
relevant
portions
investigative
report
extending
rule
trial
context
appeals
erred
iv
respondent
contends
doctrine
exempts
investigator
report
disclosure
trial
agree
doctrine
applies
criminal
litigation
well
civil
find
protection
unavailable
case
doctrine
recognized
hickman
taylor
reflects
strong
public
policy
underlying
orderly
prosecution
defense
legal
claims
see
also
jackson
concurring
observed
historically
lawyer
officer
bound
work
advancement
justice
faithfully
protecting
rightful
interests
clients
performing
various
duties
however
essential
lawyer
work
certain
degree
privacy
free
unnecessary
intrusion
opposing
parties
counsel
proper
preparation
client
case
demands
assemble
information
sift
considers
relevant
irrelevant
facts
prepare
legal
theories
plan
strategy
without
undue
needless
interference
historical
necessary
way
lawyers
act
within
framework
system
jurisprudence
promote
justice
protect
clients
interests
work
reflected
course
interviews
statements
memoranda
correspondence
briefs
mental
impressions
personal
beliefs
countless
tangible
intangible
ways
aptly
though
roughly
termed
circuit
appeals
case
work
product
lawyer
materials
open
opposing
counsel
mere
demand
much
put
writing
remain
unwritten
attorney
thoughts
heretofore
inviolate
inefficiency
unfairness
sharp
practices
inevitably
develop
giving
legal
advice
preparation
cases
trial
effect
legal
profession
demoralizing
interests
clients
cause
justice
poorly
served
although
doctrine
frequently
asserted
bar
discovery
civil
litigation
role
assuring
proper
functioning
criminal
justice
system
even
vital
interests
society
accused
obtaining
fair
accurate
resolution
question
guilt
innocence
demand
adequate
safeguards
assure
thorough
preparation
presentation
side
case
core
doctrine
shelters
mental
processes
attorney
providing
privileged
area
within
analyze
prepare
client
case
doctrine
intensely
practical
one
grounded
realities
litigation
adversary
system
one
realities
attorneys
often
must
rely
assistance
investigators
agents
compilation
materials
preparation
trial
therefore
necessary
doctrine
protect
material
prepared
agents
attorney
well
prepared
attorney
moreover
concerns
reflected
doctrine
disappear
trial
begun
disclosure
attorney
efforts
trial
surely
disclosure
pretrial
discovery
disrupt
orderly
development
presentation
case
need
however
undertake
delineate
scope
doctrine
trial
instance
clear
defense
waived
right
may
existed
invoke
protections
privilege
derived
doctrine
absolute
like
qualified
privileges
may
waived
respondent
sought
adduce
testimony
investigator
contrast
recollection
contested
statements
prosecution
witnesses
respondent
electing
present
investigator
witness
waived
privilege
respect
matters
covered
testimony
respondent
advance
doctrine
sustain
unilateral
testimonial
use
materials
elect
testify
behalf
thereafter
assert
fifth
amendment
privilege
resist
matters
reasonably
related
brought
direct
examination
see
mcgautha
california
finally
examination
record
persuades
us
district
properly
exercised
discretion
instance
authorized
general
fishing
expedition
defense
files
indeed
even
defense
investigator
report
cf
wright
app
rather
considered
ruling
quite
limited
scope
opening
prosecution
scrutiny
portion
report
related
testimony
investigator
offer
discredit
witnesses
identification
testimony
afforded
respondent
maximum
opportunity
assist
avoiding
unwarranted
disclosure
exercise
informed
choice
call
investigator
testimony
thereby
open
report
examination
preclusion
sanction
entirely
proper
method
assuring
compliance
order
respondent
argument
ruling
deprived
sixth
amendment
rights
compulsory
process
misconceives
issue
district
bar
investigator
testimony
cf
washington
texas
merely
prevented
respondent
presenting
jury
partial
view
credibility
issue
adducing
investigator
testimony
thereafter
refusing
disclose
contemporaneous
report
might
offer
critical
insights
sixth
amendment
confer
right
present
testimony
free
legitimate
demands
adversarial
system
one
invoke
sixth
amendment
justification
presenting
might
deciding
within
discretion
assure
jury
hear
full
testimony
investigator
rather
truncated
portion
favorable
respondent
think
artificial
indeed
deprive
power
effectuate
judgment
find
constitutional
significance
fact
instance
able
exclude
testimony
advance
rather
receive
evidence
thereafter
charge
jury
disregard
respondent
counsel
refused
said
produce
report
judgment
appeals
ninth
circuit
therefore
reversed
footnotes
counsel
government
complained
portion
report
produced
time
illegible
witness
testimony
indicates
however
difficulty
reading
essence
district
order
follows
investigator
allowed
testify
necessary
portions
investigative
report
contain
statements
impeached
witness
turned
prosecution
nothing
else
report
testifies
way
impeaching
statements
made
either
two
witnesses
view
government
entitled
look
report
portions
report
contain
alleged
impeaching
statements
witnesses
app
although
portion
report
containing
bank
teller
alleged
statement
previously
revealed
marked
identification
introduced
evidence
discussion
investigator
testimony
subsequently
arose
counsel
government
noted
limited
opportunity
glance
statement
requested
disclosure
portion
report
well
statement
purportedly
made
salesman
indicated
bank
teller
deny
made
statement
recorded
investigator
report
thus
possible
investigator
testimony
point
constituted
impeachment
statements
witness
within
contemplation
order
given
rise
duty
disclosure
counsel
pursue
point
however
seek
clarification
issue
respondent
view
failure
develop
issue
trial
urge
ground
reversal
respondent
maintain
initial
disclosure
bank
teller
statement
sufficed
satisfy
order
therefore
consider
two
alleged
statements
report
impeaching
statements
subject
disclosure
investigator
testified
discretion
recognized
jencks
subsequently
circumscribed
congress
jencks
act
see
generally
palermo
rule
new
federal
rules
evidence
entitles
adverse
party
inspect
writing
relied
refresh
recollection
witness
testifying
rule
also
authorizes
disclosure
writings
relied
refresh
recollection
testifying
deems
necessary
interests
justice
party
obtaining
writing
thereafter
use
witness
introduce
evidence
portions
relate
witness
testimony
federal
rules
evidence
effect
time
respondent
trial
occasion
consider
applicability
situation
presented
purpose
relevant
part
fifth
amendment
prevent
compelled
protect
private
information
testimony
demanded
witness
may
private
indeed
unless
incriminating
protected
amendment
unless
protected
one
evidentiary
privileges
must
disclosed
maness
meyers
white
concurring
result
moreover
constitutional
guarantee
protects
forced
individual
disclosure
testimonial
communicative
nature
schmerber
california
see
also
wade
gilbert
california
rule
establishes
government
reciprocal
right
pretrial
discovery
excepts
reports
memoranda
internal
defense
documents
made
defendant
attorneys
agents
connection
investigation
defense
case
statements
made
defendant
government
defense
witnesses
prospective
government
defense
witnesses
defendant
agents
attorneys
rule
therefore
authorize
pretrial
discovery
investigator
report
proposed
amendments
federal
rules
criminal
procedure
leave
subsection
substantially
unchanged
see
proposed
rule
criminal
procedure
rule
imposes
duty
notify
opposing
counsel
additional
materials
previously
requested
inspected
subject
discovery
inspection
rule
contemplates
obligation
continue
trial
obligation
rule
depends
however
previous
request
order
discovery
fact
provision
may
effect
parties
conduct
trial
convert
rule
general
limitation
inherent
power
control
evidentiary
matters
note
also
commentators
considered
rule
suggested
directed
control
evidentiary
questions
arising
trial
see
nakell
criminal
discovery
defense
prosecution
developing
constitutional
considerations
rev
rezneck
new
federal
rules
criminal
procedure
geo
note
prosecutorial
discovery
proposed
rule
harv
rev
recognized
hickman
taylor
doctrine
distinct
broader
privilege
number
state
federal
decisions
recognized
role
doctrine
criminal
law
applied
protections
files
prosecution
accused
alike
see
state
bowen
cert
denied
state
ex
rel
polley
superior
santa
cruz
county
peel
state
app
grand
jury
proceedings
duffy
terkeltoub
supp
sdny
sole
issue
hickman
related
materials
prepared
attorney
courts
thereafter
disagreed
whether
doctrine
applied
well
materials
prepared
behalf
see
proposed
amendments
federal
rules
civil
procedure
relating
discovery
moore
federal
practice
ed
necessarily
must
view
reflected
federal
rules
civil
procedure
see
rule
rule
criminal
rules
well
see
rules
cf
cleary
mccormick
evidence
ed
constitutes
waiver
respect
materials
depends
course
upon
circumstances
counsel
necessarily
makes
use
throughout
trial
notes
documents
internal
materials
prepared
present
adequately
client
case
often
relies
examining
witnesses
used
normally
waiver
counsel
attempts
make
testimonial
use
materials
normal
rules
evidence
come
play
respect
production
documents
accept
respondent
contention
disclosure
order
violated
sixth
amendment
right
effective
assistance
counsel
claim
predicated
assumption
disclosure
defense
investigator
notes
similar
cases
compromise
counsel
ability
investigate
prepare
defense
case
thoroughly
respondent
maintains
even
limited
disclosure
required
case
impair
relationship
trust
confidence
client
attorney
inhibit
members
defense
team
gathering
information
essential
effective
preparation
case
see
american
bar
association
project
standards
criminal
justice
defense
function
app
draft
short
answer
disclosure
order
resulted
respondent
voluntary
election
make
testimonial
use
investigator
report
moreover
apart
waiver
think
concern
voiced
respondent
fails
recognize
limited
conditional
nature
order
respondent
additionally
argues
certain
statements
prosecution
district
exclusion
purported
expert
testimony
justify
reversal
verdict
appeals
decision
affirmed
grounds
appeals
rejected
respondent
challenge
exclusion
testimony
proffered
expert
respondent
present
issue
question
involving
challenged
prosecutorial
statements
certiorari
without
questioning
jurisdiction
consider
alternative
grounds
affirmance
decision
cf
langnes
green
dandridge
williams
see
generally
stern
certainty
confusion
harv
rev
consider
contentions
worthy
consideration
involves
issue
committed
trial
discretion
absence
strong
suggestion
abuse
discretion
indication
issues
sufficient
general
importance
justify
grant
certiorari
decline
entertain
justice
white
justice
rehnquist
joins
concurring
concur
judgment
parts
ii
iii
opinion
write
misgivings
meaning
part
iv
opinion
appears
held
part
iv
opinion
whatever
protection
defense
investigator
notes
interviews
witnesses
might
otherwise
protection
lost
investigator
testified
interviews
agree
also
seems
sensible
however
decide
protection
notes
first
place
reaching
waiver
issue
accordingly
believe
doctrine
hickman
taylor
extended
wholesale
historic
role
limitation
nonevidentiary
material
may
subject
pretrial
discovery
unprecedented
role
limitation
trial
judge
power
compel
production
evidentiary
matter
trial
add
following
doctrine
hickman
taylor
supra
viewed
almost
exclusively
limitation
ability
party
obtain
pretrial
discovery
viewed
limitation
trial
broad
discretion
evidentiary
questions
trial
ante
problem
discussed
hickman
taylor
arose
precisely
addition
accelerating
time
party
obtain
evidentiary
matter
adversary
new
federal
rules
civil
procedure
greatly
expanded
nature
material
subject
pretrial
disclosure
rules
party
first
time
entitled
know
advance
opponent
evidence
entitled
obtain
opponent
nonprivileged
information
existence
whereabouts
facts
relevant
case
even
though
information
evidentiary
hickman
taylor
supra
utilizing
rules
plaintiff
hickman
taylor
sought
discovery
statements
obtained
defense
counsel
witnesses
events
relevant
lawsuit
evidentiary
use
help
prepare
examine
witnesses
make
sure
ha
overlooked
nothing
emphasis
added
concluding
statements
produced
treated
matter
entirely
one
involving
plaintiff
entitlement
pretrial
discovery
new
federal
rules
carefully
limited
opinion
accordingly
relevant
rule
view
rule
face
required
production
witness
statements
unless
privileged
nonetheless
expressly
stated
request
witness
statements
denied
subject
matter
privileged
although
noting
privilege
applies
england
concept
used
rules
request
falls
outside
arena
discovery
emphasis
added
stated
essential
lawyer
work
certain
degree
privacy
concluded
effect
giving
one
lawyer
work
particularly
strategy
legal
theories
mental
impressions
another
demoralizing
effect
legal
profession
noted
witness
statements
might
admissible
evidence
circumstances
might
usable
impeach
corroborate
witness
however
concluded
case
plaintiff
wanted
statements
preparation
shown
reason
obtain
everything
sought
work
rather
utilizing
adversary
conclusion
work
product
lawyer
privileged
made
much
difficult
support
result
nothing
expressed
rule
supported
result
forced
explain
decision
stating
rule
discovery
rules
adopted
members
bar
general
certainly
believe
contemplate
files
mental
processes
lawyers
thereby
opened
free
scrutiny
adversaries
emphasis
added
since
hickman
taylor
supra
congress
cases
commentators
uniformly
continued
view
work
product
doctrine
solely
limitation
pretrial
discovery
qualified
evidentiary
privilege
congress
became
involved
problem
first
time
civil
area
solely
accepting
proposed
amendment
fed
rule
civ
proc
incorporated
much
held
hickman
taylor
supra
respect
pretrial
discovery
see
advisory
committee
explanatory
statement
criminal
area
congress
enacted
accepted
fed
rule
crim
proc
former
prevents
pretrial
discovery
witness
statements
government
latter
prevents
pretrial
discovery
witness
statements
defense
neither
limits
power
trial
order
production
evidence
prior
statements
witnesses
testified
trial
exception
materials
type
discussed
part
ii
infra
research
uncovered
application
rule
lower
courts
since
hickman
prevent
production
evidence
impeaching
otherwise
trial
several
examples
cases
rejecting
approach
similarly
commentators
treated
attorney
rule
solely
limitation
pretrial
discovery
moore
federal
practice
ed
wright
miller
federal
practice
procedure
barron
holtzoff
federal
practice
procedure
wright
ed
expressly
stated
apply
evidentiary
matter
james
civil
procedure
moore
federal
practice
reasons
largely
confining
rule
role
limitation
pretrial
discovery
compelling
first
injury
factfinding
process
far
greater
rule
keeps
evidence
fact
finder
simply
keeps
advance
disclosure
evidence
party
keeps
leads
evidence
developed
adversary
well
able
find
main
party
seeks
discover
statement
made
opposing
party
order
prepare
trial
obtain
substantial
equivalent
means
fed
rule
civ
proc
interviewing
witness
prior
inconsistent
statement
possession
adversary
however
sought
evidentiary
purposes
impeach
witness
testifies
purpose
unique
token
danger
perceived
hickman
party
case
decline
prepare
hopes
eventually
using
adversary
preparation
absent
disclosure
take
place
trial
indeed
difficult
articulate
reason
statements
subject
matter
witness
testimony
turned
adversary
witness
testified
statement
either
consistent
witness
testimony
case
useless
disclosure
harmless
inconsistent
unquestioned
value
jury
claim
disclosure
statement
lead
trial
collateral
confusing
issues
rejected
jencks
congress
legislation
followed
strong
negative
implication
hickman
taylor
supra
rule
apply
evidentiary
requests
trial
became
holding
jencks
supra
defendant
criminal
case
sought
production
government
trial
prior
statements
made
witnesses
subject
matter
testimony
government
argued
inter
alia
production
violate
legitimate
interest
party
including
government
safeguarding
privacy
files
held
government
said
deny
disclosure
prior
statements
might
used
impeach
witnesses
deny
accused
evidence
relevant
material
defense
emphasis
added
also
rejected
unrealistic
rule
require
defendant
demonstrate
impeachment
value
prior
statements
disclosure
held
entitlement
disclosure
use
established
reports
shown
relate
testimony
witness
thus
reject
notion
work
product
limitation
trial
judge
discretion
order
production
evidentiary
matter
trial
affirmatively
held
prior
statements
witness
subject
testimony
kind
evidentiary
matter
adversary
entitled
indeed
even
pretrial
discovery
area
rule
apply
notions
thought
insufficient
prevent
discovery
evidentiary
impeachment
material
hickman
taylor
stated
mean
say
written
materials
obtained
prepared
adversary
counsel
eye
toward
litigation
necessarily
free
discovery
cases
relevant
nonprivileged
facts
remain
hidden
attorney
file
production
facts
essential
preparation
one
case
discovery
may
properly
written
statements
documents
might
certain
circumstances
admissible
evidence
give
clues
existence
location
relevant
facts
might
useful
purposes
impeachment
corroboration
emphasis
added
accordingly
appear
one
exception
discussed
notions
hickman
taylor
supra
impose
restrictions
trial
judge
ordering
production
evidentiary
matter
trial
notions
apply
limited
way
party
efforts
obtain
evidence
pretrial
pursuant
available
discovery
devices
notions
supply
qualified
discovery
immunity
respect
witness
statements
event
ii
one
aspects
rule
hickman
taylor
supra
application
evidentiary
requests
trial
majority
concurring
opinions
hickman
taylor
pains
distinguish
production
statements
written
witness
possession
lawyer
statements
made
orally
witness
written
lawyer
production
use
oral
statements
written
lawyer
create
substantial
risk
lawyer
testify
majority
said
make
attorney
much
less
officer
much
ordinary
witness
justice
jackson
concurring
stated
every
lawyer
dislikes
take
witness
stand
grave
reasons
partly
role
almost
invariably
poor
witness
steps
professional
character
regrets
profession
discourages
practice
advocated
one
force
witness
seen
done
witnesses
stories
wants
remarks
hickman
taylor
supra
made
context
request
pretrial
discovery
application
evidentiary
use
lawyers
memoranda
witness
interviews
trial
unnecessary
however
decide
case
whether
policies
putting
issue
credibility
lawyer
sum
jury
outweigh
jury
interest
obtaining
relevant
information
whether
jencks
supra
viewed
expressing
preference
disclosure
facts
case
creator
memorandum
trial
lawyer
investigator
event
called
witness
defense
accordingly
reverse
judgment
quite
apart
waiver
rule
hickman
taylor
supra
application
request
trial
evidentiary
impeachment
material
made
case
criminal
discovery
rules
time
factor
great
might
otherwise
appear
federal
rule
crim
proc
permits
discovery
time
trial
fed
rule
crim
proc
evidentiary
matter
may
obtained
pursuant
subpoena
advance
trial
discretion
trial
judge
prior
federal
rules
requests
witness
statements
granted
denied
basis
whether
evidence
nonprivileged
main
production
denied
either
witness
statements
evidence
inadmissible
hearsay
unless
witness
testifies
party
entitled
advance
knowledge
adversary
case
statements
made
client
agent
attorney
thus
covered
privilege
moore
federal
practice
ed
cases
cited
therein
cases
hold
witness
statements
generally
privileged
evidentiary
cause
decide
whether
notion
protect
discovery
since
nondiscoverable
anyway
applicable
discovery
rules
see
walker
struthers
justice
jackson
concurrence
even
express
point
question
simply
whether
demand
authorized
rules
relating
various
aspects
discovery
justice
jackson
also
emphasized
witness
statements
involved
hickman
taylor
neither
evidence
privileged
indeed
material
described
falling
umbrella
qualify
evidence
lawyer
mental
impressions
almost
never
evidence
statements
witness
generally
inadmissible
hearsay
statements
become
evidence
witness
testifies
trial
usually
impeachment
evidence
case
course
involves
situation
relevant
witness
testify
thus
presents
question
involved
hickman
taylor
whether
prior
statements
disclosed
trial
judge
power
evidentiary
matters
trial
opinion
cites
fed
rule
crim
proc
containing
rule
correctly
notes
rule
directed
control
evidentiary
questions
arising
trial
seems
supplies
better
ground
decision
waiver
majority
cite
one
case
terkeltoub
supp
sdny
referred
doctrine
preventing
government
inquiring
lawyer
grand
jury
whether
participated
suborning
perjury
prospective
witness
preparing
criminal
case
trial
event
grand
jury
investigation
respects
similar
pretrial
discovery
compare
grand
jury
proceedings
duffy
schwimmer
cert
denied
proper
scope
inquiry
broad
used
way
preparing
later
criminal
trial
example
split
authority
whether
rule
applies
irs
tax
investigations
compare
mckay
brown
shaw
wuttke
state
ex
rel
state
highway
steinkraus
du
pont
de
nemours
phillips
petroleum
del
matles
supp
edny
sun
oil
ed
gates
jencks
quoted
language
chief
justice
marshall
burr
cas
paper
possession
opposite
party
statement
contents
applicability
expected
person
claims
production
precisely
knowing
contents
cummings
bell
telephone
pennsylvania
ed
marks
gas
service
supp
wd
mo
maginnis
westinghouse
electric
supp
ed
la
julius
hyman
american
motorists
ins
parrett
ford
motor
wd
mo
scuderi
boston
ins
del
involving
situation
member
litigation
team
witnessed
event
scene
course
preparing
case
trial
ordered
disclosure
report
event
bourget
government
employees
ins
mccullough
tool
pan
geo
atlas
sd
tex
life
ins
north
america
supp
wd
mo
cf
larocca
state
farm
mutual
automobile
ins
wd
kennedy
senyo
wd
preparation
trial
subject
suit
see
also
natta
hogan
james
civil
procedure
holding
jencks
put
rest
claim
prior
statement
disclosable
adversary
established
evidentiary
value
ahead
time
specific
proof
inconsistent
vetter
lovett
wd
tex
mcdonald
prowdley
wd
tannenbaum
walker
ed
fulton
swift
mont
republic
gear
camera
inspection
cf
goosman
duie
pyle
cases
contra
see
moore
federal
practice
ed
majority
moreover
concerns
reflected
doctrine
disappear
trial
begun
disclosure
attorney
efforts
trial
surely
disclosure
pretrial
discovery
disrupt
orderly
development
presentation
case
need
however
undertake
delineate
scope
doctrine
trial
instance
clear
defense
waived
right
may
existed
invoke
protections
ante
witness
acknowledge
making
inconsistent
statement
lawyer
even
though
lawyer
recorded
may
offer
document
evidence
without
least
calling
lawyer
witness
authenticate
document
otherwise
testify
prior
statement
porter
app
fiorillo
gajewski
cert
newman
travelers
ins
dykes
alu
chiarella
modified
rehearing
vacated
one
petitioner
cert
denied
petitioner
sub
nom
stancin
clancy
rev
grounds
cases
held
records
witness
statements
made
prosecutors
disclosable
hilbrich
cert
reh
aviles
saunders
app
smaldone
cert
cf
canaday
state
bowen
reached
contrary
result
state
law
conflict
arose
among
lower
federal
courts
question
whether
work
product
members
litigation
team
lawyer
protected
discovery
rule
hickman
taylor
supra
ghent
development
since
hickman
taylor
attorney
work
product
doctrine
proposed
amendments
federal
rules
civil
procedure
relating
discovery
respect
discovery
civil
cases
fed
rule
civ
proc
conflict
resolved
amendments
affording
protection
documents
party
representative
whether
lawyer
purpose
rule
protecting
work
product
remove
incentive
party
might
otherwise
rely
solely
opponent
preparation
sensible
treat
preparation
attorney
investigator
alike
however
policy
lawyers
testifying
applies
lawyer
tries
case