ex
rel
marcus
hess
argued
december
decided
january
rehearing
denied
march
see
william
stanley
washington
charles
margiotti
pittsburgh
petitioner
wm
eckert
eugene
strassburger
john
nicklas
pittsburgh
respondents
justice
black
delivered
opinion
respondents
electrical
contractors
employed
work
projects
pittsburgh
area
contracts
made
local
governmental
units
rather
government
substantial
portion
pay
came
charging
respondents
defrauding
device
collusive
bidding
petitioner
name
behalf
brought
action
revised
statutes
sections
distributed
statutes
parts
originally
act
march
stat
section
contains
portion
original
act
makes
certain
efforts
defraud
government
crime
punishable
fine
ment
section
separately
provides
whoever
commits
prohibited
acts
shall
pay
sum
addition
double
amount
damages
sustained
together
costs
suit
forfeiture
damages
shall
sued
suit
latter
action
may
instituted
person
behalf
government
qui
tam
action
brought
half
amount
recovery
paid
person
instituting
suit
half
goes
government
instant
case
verdict
judgment
rendered
defendants
double
damages
aggregate
sums
violations
circuit
appeals
opinion
government
conclusion
challenged
held
particular
fraud
reached
accordingly
reversed
first
construing
strictness
premise
qui
tam
informer
actions
always
regarded
disfavor
courts
emphasized
absence
direct
contractual
relationship
respondents
held
claims
defendants
simply
local
municipalities
since
defendants
claim
upon
action
authorized
informer
statutes
accept
either
interpretive
approach
actual
decision
qui
tam
suits
frequently
permitted
legislative
without
defense
courts
moreover
interpretation
strictness
narrows
qui
tam
aspect
act
also
criminal
provisions
decision
treats
language
fashion
criminal
proceedings
brought
respondents
result
policy
qui
tam
actions
immaterial
even
exists
properly
applied
tam
policy
used
detract
meaning
language
criminal
section
say
substantive
language
one
meaning
criminal
prosecutions
brought
public
officials
quite
different
meaning
language
invoked
informer
congress
power
choose
method
protect
government
burdens
fraudulently
imposed
upon
nullify
criminal
statute
dislike
independent
informer
sections
exercise
veto
power
sound
rules
statutory
interpretation
exist
discover
direct
congressional
true
criminal
reason
interpreting
much
language
shares
common
sec
must
give
careful
scrutiny
lest
brought
within
reach
clearly
included
scrutiny
must
give
fair
meaning
intendment
cf
raynor
think
conduct
respondents
comes
well
within
prohibition
statute
includes
person
causes
presented
payment
claim
upon
government
knowing
claim
fraudulent
best
seen
upon
consideration
exact
nature
respondents
relation
government
contracts
found
induced
respondents
frauds
made
local
municipalities
school
districts
alleghany
county
pennsylvania
large
portion
money
paid
respondents
contracts
federal
origin
granted
federal
public
works
administrator
official
jury
courts
found
contracts
obtained
successfully
executed
conspiracy
remove
possible
competition
bidding
bidding
federal
requirement
bidders
fully
advised
projects
many
respondents
certified
bids
sham
collusive
payment
sense
direct
transferring
checks
done
name
local
authorities
monthly
estimates
payment
submitted
respondents
local
sponsors
forms
showed
government
participation
work
called
attention
federal
statutes
prohibiting
fraudulent
claims
prerequisite
respondents
payment
local
sponsors
estimates
filed
transmitted
approved
authorities
payment
made
joint
construction
bank
account
containing
federal
local
funds
work
done
constant
federal
supervision
government
money
never
placed
joint
fund
payment
respondents
agents
known
bids
collusive
conduct
respondents
thus
caused
government
pay
claims
local
sponsors
order
might
turn
pay
respondents
contracts
found
executed
result
fraudulent
bidding
fraud
spend
execution
contract
taint
entered
every
swollen
estimate
basic
cause
payment
every
dollar
paid
joint
fund
benefit
respondents
initial
fraudulent
action
every
step
thereafter
taken
pressed
ever
ultimate
government
money
persons
caused
defrauded
government
money
truly
expended
whether
checks
drawn
directly
treasury
ultimate
recipient
grants
aid
time
passage
original
act
federal
aid
consisted
primarily
land
grants
subsequent
years
state
aid
program
grown
approximately
federal
money
distributed
form
funds
much
need
protection
fraudulent
claims
federal
statute
make
extent
safeguard
dependent
upon
bookkeeping
devices
used
distribution
senatorial
sponsor
bill
broadly
asserted
object
provide
protection
fraud
effort
cheat
state
intermediary
conclusion
first
clause
includes
form
presented
upon
government
strengthened
consideration
clauses
statute
clause
includes
forbidden
acts
purpose
obtain
payment
fraudulent
claims
clause
covers
agreement
combination
conspiracy
defraud
government
aiding
obtain
payment
allowance
false
fraudulent
claim
provisions
considered
together
indicate
purpose
reach
person
knowingly
assisted
causing
government
pay
claims
grounded
fraud
without
regard
whether
person
direct
contractual
relations
government
situation
sense
like
discussed
cohn
government
acted
solely
bailee
person
claim
payment
cohn
case
held
obtaining
money
government
obtaining
claims
presented
either
directly
indirectly
government
full
knowledge
claimants
fraudulent
basis
conclude
acts
covered
statute
consideration
second
previous
filing
action
respondents
indicted
defrauding
government
plea
nolo
contendere
fined
government
filed
brief
amicus
curiae
request
assert
petitioner
received
information
investigation
previous
indictment
argue
circumstances
construed
permitting
suit
petitioner
petitioner
denies
relied
upon
information
contained
indictment
asserts
spent
money
conducting
investigation
claims
presented
evidence
government
discovered
even
government
suggests
petitioner
contributed
nothing
discovery
crime
contributed
much
accomplishing
one
purposes
act
passed
suit
results
net
recovery
government
three
times
much
fines
imposed
criminal
proceedings
recovery
obtained
risk
considerable
loss
petitioner
since
explicitly
provides
informer
must
bear
risk
pay
full
cost
litigation
neither
language
statute
history
lends
support
contention
made
respondents
government
may
brought
carried
person
says
act
words
exception
qualification
asked
find
senate
sponsor
bill
explicitly
pointed
offering
plan
aimed
solely
rewarding
conspirator
betrays
fellows
even
district
attorney
presumably
gain
knowledge
fraud
official
position
might
sue
informer
bill
offers
short
reward
informer
comes
betrays
confined
class
even
district
attorney
required
vigilant
prosecution
cases
may
also
informer
entitle
one
half
forfeiture
qui
tam
clause
one
half
double
damages
may
recovered
persons
committing
act
government
presses
upon
us
strong
arguments
policy
statutory
plan
entire
force
considerations
directed
solely
government
thinks
congress
done
rather
said
effective
law
enforcement
requires
control
litigation
left
attorney
general
divided
control
public
interest
attorney
general
might
believe
war
interests
injured
filing
suits
permission
outsiders
sue
might
bring
unseemly
races
opportunity
profiting
government
investigations
finally
conditions
changed
since
act
passed
trouble
arguments
addressed
wrong
forum
conditions
may
changed
statute
furthermore
one
chief
purposes
act
first
passed
war
time
stimulate
action
protect
government
war
frauds
end
prosecuting
attorneys
enjoined
diligent
enforcement
act
provisions
large
rewards
offered
stimulate
actions
private
parties
prosecuting
officers
tardy
bringing
suits
fact
congress
passed
statute
shows
concluded
considerations
policy
outweighed
emphasized
government
arguments
made
militate
informer
action
government
filed
suit
prior
instituted
petitioner
different
question
presented
cf
francis
wall
circumstances
without
materially
detracting
clear
scope
decline
recognize
petitioner
right
sue
act
third
noted
respondents
previously
indicted
fined
defrauding
government
connection
transactions
sued
contend
present
action
barred
jeopardy
provision
fifth
amendment
provides
person
shall
subject
offense
twice
put
jeopardy
life
limb
previous
indictment
brought
general
statute
dealing
conspiracy
defraud
government
clearly
criminal
nature
violation
respondents
liable
fine
imprisonment
two
years
failure
pay
fines
sentenced
prison
ex
parte
watkins
pet
punishment
given
action
intended
compensate
government
manner
damages
suffered
result
successful
execution
conspiracy
respondents
contention
overruled
district
considered
appeals
urged
upon
us
independent
ground
support
judgment
reached
cf
helvering
gowran
application
double
jeopardy
clause
particular
cases
easy
task
courts
subject
recently
thoroughly
explored
helvering
mitchell
analyzed
cases
pressed
upon
us
emphasized
line
civil
remedial
actions
brought
primarily
protect
government
financial
loss
actions
intended
authorize
criminal
punishment
vindicate
public
justice
latter
subject
defendant
within
constitutional
meaning
may
start
therefore
language
mitchell
case
may
impose
criminal
civil
sanction
respect
act
omission
double
jeopardy
clause
prohibits
merely
punishing
twice
attempting
second
time
punish
criminally
offense
question
decision
thus
whether
statute
question
imposes
criminal
sanction
question
one
statutory
construction
action
us
consisting
double
damages
forfeiture
criminal
remedial
enough
present
purposes
conclude
instant
proceedings
remedial
impose
civil
sanction
statutes
suit
rests
makes
elaborate
provision
criminal
punishment
civil
remedy
violators
may
imprisoned
hard
labor
less
one
five
years
fined
less
one
thousand
five
thousand
dollars
say
remedy
us
requiring
payment
lump
sum
double
damages
afford
government
complete
indemnity
injuries
done
helvering
mitchell
supra
course
well
accepted
one
act
person
may
liable
pay
damages
suffer
criminal
penalty
long
ago
said
man
may
compelled
make
reparation
damages
injured
party
liable
also
punishment
breach
public
peace
consequence
act
may
said
common
parlance
twice
punished
offence
moore
illinois
congress
give
action
damages
individual
suffers
breach
law
chattanooga
foundry
atlanta
power
rather
private
individual
injured
fraud
quite
aside
interest
preserver
peace
government
spending
money
interest
protecting
fraudulent
practices
protecting
citizen
frauds
may
practiced
upon
powers
sovereign
dealing
offenders
laws
must
confounded
rights
body
politic
present
strange
anomaly
indeed
power
make
contracts
hold
property
persons
natural
artificial
entitled
remedies
protection
cotton
remedy
lose
quality
civil
action
precise
amount
actual
damage
recovered
double
damage
provision
said
recovery
excess
actual
loss
government
since
nature
qui
tam
action
government
half
double
damages
amount
actual
damages
proved
case
congress
might
provided
laws
recovery
damages
sustained
cost
suit
including
reasonable
attorney
fee
congress
remain
fully
common
law
tradition
still
provide
punitive
damages
common
well
statute
law
men
aften
punished
aggravated
misconduct
lawless
acts
means
civil
action
damages
inflicted
way
penalty
punishment
given
party
injured
day
woodworth
noted
general
practice
state
statutes
allowing
double
treble
even
quadruple
damages
missouri
pacific
ry
humes
punitive
exemplary
damages
held
recoverable
statute
like
combines
provision
criminal
punishment
others
afford
civil
remedy
individual
injured
felix
law
provide
measure
damage
government
individual
argued
pay
provision
rather
even
double
damage
feature
words
pay
relate
alike
sum
double
damages
use
word
conjunction
word
force
conclusion
provision
criminal
one
doubts
congress
accomplished
result
authorizing
damages
lump
sum
payment
attorney
fees
definition
elements
damages
special
consequence
drawn
use
word
might
circumstances
appropriate
word
suggest
fine
upon
failure
pay
individual
might
imprisoned
punishment
provided
upon
default
payment
words
pay
wholly
consistent
civil
action
damages
atchison
railway
nichols
cf
hepner
ann
true
certain
limited
sense
may
result
statute
us
far
wrongdoer
concerned
enough
label
criminal
statute
brady
daly
think
chief
purpose
statutes
provide
restitution
government
money
taken
fraud
device
double
damages
plus
specific
sum
chosen
make
sure
government
made
completely
whole
conclusion
consistent
statement
made
immediately
final
passage
bill
senator
discussing
sections
said
government
privilege
coming
upon
fraudulent
contractor
estate
heirs
recovering
money
defrauded
inherent
difficulty
choosing
proper
specific
sum
give
full
restitution
problem
congress
fourth
section
requires
forfeit
paid
acts
prohibited
district
petitioner
contended
sum
exacted
every
form
submitted
respondents
course
enterprise
respondents
argued
merely
one
sum
collected
acts
done
district
concluded
lump
sum
damages
assessed
separate
project
petitioner
object
decision
conclude
circumstances
case
project
properly
counted
separately
incidence
fraud
additional
project
clearly
individualized
theft
mail
separate
bags
post
office
ebeling
morgan
see
blockburger
cf
gavieres
respondents
view
lump
sum
paid
project
suppose
congress
meant
thus
reduce
damages
recoverable
respondents
fraud
thereby
allow
spread
burden
progressively
thinner
projects
individually
increased
profit
examined
contentions
respondents
approve
disposition
courts
judgment
circuit
appeals
reversed
district
affirmed
ordered
reversed
justice
murphy
took
part
consideration
disposition
case
justice
frankfurter
concurring
agree
decision
seems
plea
double
jeopardy
rejected
ground
taken
respects
join
opinion
qui
tam
action
recover
amount
damages
may
sustained
reason
acts
fraud
respondents
previously
indicted
criminal
code
substantial
fines
imposed
upon
fifth
amendment
guarantees
person
shall
subject
offense
twice
put
jeopardy
life
limb
respondents
invoke
provision
bar
suit
understand
holding
rejects
plea
double
jeopardy
treating
present
action
one
merely
make
whole
actual
loss
therefore
without
punitive
elements
reaches
conclusion
applying
distinction
taken
helvering
mitchell
remedial
punitive
argument
seems
run
thus
double
jeopardy
means
attempting
punish
criminally
twice
attempt
punish
criminally
civil
proceeding
civil
proceeding
matter
construction
sanction
enforced
sanction
nature
dialectical
subleties
may
serve
well
enough
purposes
explaining
away
uncritical
language
earlier
cases
see
instance
chouteau
coffey
la
franca
subtle
problem
one
safeguarding
humane
interests
protection
double
jeopardy
clause
written
fifth
amendment
punitive
ends
may
pursued
civil
proceedings
conversely
criminal
process
frequently
employed
attain
remedial
rather
punitive
ends
reason
scienter
deemed
requirement
criminal
prosecutions
instances
found
regulatory
measures
exercise
called
police
power
emphasis
statute
evidently
upon
achievement
social
betterment
rather
punishment
crimes
balint
protection
twice
punished
offense
hardly
made
depend
upon
necessarily
speculative
judgment
whether
amount
damages
may
sustained
constitute
extra
penalty
merely
indemnity
loss
suffered
issue
protection
double
jeopardy
turns
invoke
constitution
respondents
allowed
prove
matter
fact
forfeiture
double
damages
punitive
exceed
amount
reasonably
regarded
equivalent
compensation
government
loss
civil
actions
punitive
damages
matter
due
process
sometimes
allowed
see
minnesota
may
distinct
penal
remedial
provisions
wrong
see
felix
help
solve
present
problem
arises
second
separate
proceeding
persons
misconduct
results
plea
based
upon
double
jeopardy
clause
must
also
put
one
side
doctrine
res
judicata
largely
judicial
doctrine
though
partly
reflected
full
faith
credit
clause
article
iv
aimed
avoiding
waste
vexation
relitigating
issues
already
decided
parties
doctrine
double
jeopardy
different
history
part
protection
constitution
pressures
penalties
offend
civilized
notions
justice
view
proper
approach
problem
double
jeopardy
situation
like
congress
imposed
two
sanctions
misconduct
however
one
may
label
provided
enforcement
two
separate
proceedings
taken
judge
later
justice
blatchford
leszynsky
blatchf
short
two
proceedings
merely
carry
remedies
congress
prescribed
advance
wrong
twice
put
man
jeopardy
offense
congress
thereby
merely
allows
comprehensive
penalties
imposed
enforced
separate
suits
instead
single
proceeding
congress
impose
single
punishment
double
jeopardy
clause
prevent
congress
prescribing
procedure
vindication
punitive
remedies
view
commends
reason
confirmed
history
legislation
character
providing
two
sanctions
misconduct
enforceable
separate
proceedings
one
conventional
criminal
prosecution
forfeiture
proceeding
civil
action
upon
debt
quite
common
fifth
amendment
framed
congress
see
terials
referred
leszynsky
supra
blatchf
pages
like
specific
provisions
constitution
double
jeopardy
clause
must
read
context
times
violence
proper
regard
framers
fifth
amendment
assume
contemporaneously
enacted
continued
enact
legislation
offensive
guarantees
double
jeopardy
clause
proposed
ratification
suggested
succession
separate
trials
enforcement
great
number
criminal
sanctions
even
though
set
forth
advance
single
statute
might
form
cruelty
oppression
answer
constitution
guarded
attempt
wear
accused
multitude
cases
accumulated
trials
see
palko
connecticut
prohibiting
unusual
punishments
amendment
viii
short
offend
eighth
amendment
statutes
prescribing
cumulative
remedies
commonplaces
history
federal
legislation
sherman
law
note
example
allows
four
means
redressing
single
prosecution
injunction
seizure
goods
treble
damages
qui
tam
action
like
one
us
provided
congress
deterrent
violation
sherman
law
certainly
commonly
regarded
additional
punishment
double
jeopardy
clause
nevertheless
come
play
reasons
think
plea
double
jeopardy
case
sustained
justice
jackson
dissenting
constrained
dissent
second
division
opinion
conclusion
supports
deny
literal
reading
statute
says
opinion
renders
say
case
one
critical
stay
close
words
statute
guiding
principles
depart
direction
depart
far
depart
literal
words
statute
conflicting
matters
considerable
although
freedom
certain
better
state
attitude
toward
present
statute
applied
case
language
present
chief
justice
katz
laws
given
sensible
construction
literal
application
statute
lead
absurd
consequences
avoided
whenever
reasonable
application
given
consistent
legislative
purpose
announcing
unorthodox
unconventional
doctrine
american
tobacco
company
werckmeister
justice
day
said
construing
statute
always
confined
literal
reading
may
consider
object
purpose
things
dealing
condition
affairs
led
enactment
effectuate
rather
destroy
spirit
force
law
legislature
intended
enact
true
plaintiff
error
cites
authorities
proposition
words
act
clear
unambiguous
control
seeking
gain
legislative
intent
primarily
language
used
must
remember
objects
purposes
sought
attained
ever
justified
reading
statute
narrowly
keyhole
broad
light
evils
aimed
good
hoped
disadvantage
therefrom
falls
one
sues
made
whole
injuries
sustained
recover
goods
delivered
services
performed
solely
make
profitable
wrong
done
others
course
fully
sustain
informers
proceedings
congress
utilized
aid
law
enforcement
informers
disclose
law
violations
even
worst
motives
play
important
part
making
many
laws
effective
nothing
text
history
statute
indicates
congress
intended
enrich
mere
busybody
copies
government
indictment
complaint
brings
light
frauds
already
disclosed
injury
treasury
already
process
vindication
case
government
investigated
respondents
november
indicted
conspiracy
defraud
january
february
defendants
named
indictment
entered
pleas
nolo
contendere
fines
imposed
criminal
case
still
pending
january
petitioner
commenced
informer
proceeding
averments
complaint
substantially
copy
indictment
shown
original
information
added
anything
investigations
recovery
based
fact
disclosed
government
companion
case
ex
rel
ostrager
new
orleans
chapter
government
indicted
pleas
nolo
contendere
entered
january
two
weeks
thereafter
ostrager
filed
complaint
alleging
facts
substantially
identical
indictment
paragraphs
almost
verbatim
copies
informed
cases
already
stimulated
number
private
individuals
intervene
similar
action
government
criminal
proceedings
disclosed
frauds
sure
never
mind
congress
authorize
misuse
statute
ever
case
letter
killeth
spirit
giveth
life
construed
letter
becomes
instrument
abuse
corruption
stopped
timely
intervention
congress
construed
according
spirit
reward
disclose
frauds
otherwise
concealed
prosecute
frauds
otherwise
unpunished
serve
useful
purpose
enforcement
law
protection
treasury
since
law
upon
statute
books
never
bar
dreamed
permitted
use
attempted
commence
informer
action
similar
statute
government
brought
civil
action
promptly
limited
statute
preclude
sort
abuse
francis
wall
specific
language
statute
support
limitation
although
find
specific
language
statute
support
another
say
limitation
exists
government
already
possessed
facts
disclosed
criminal
proceedings
think
profession
generally
assumed
statute
mean
statute
eighty
years
authorized
sort
proceeding
legal
profession
strangely
unresponsive
congressional
proffer
windfall
income
justified
determining
whether
accept
new
interpretation
sustained
history
statute
reference
condition
times
rather
former
ones
nothing
better
illustrates
difference
conditions
present
statement
quoted
made
senate
sponsor
informer
act
district
attorney
required
vigilant
prosecution
cases
may
also
informer
entitle
one
half
forfeiture
qui
tam
clause
one
half
double
damages
may
recovered
persons
committing
act
understand
hold
prosecuting
attorney
may
sue
construing
statute
applied
plaintiff
us
must
forget
senator
speaking
enforcement
nation
yet
established
federal
department
justice
federal
bureau
investigation
treasury
investigating
force
activities
federal
government
circumscribed
found
necessary
accept
view
mean
today
officials
use
information
gleaned
investigations
sue
informers
profit
make
law
downright
vicious
corrupting
one
fortunately
one
executive
department
ever
suspected
interpretation
indulges
placed
upon
statute
add
motives
personal
avarice
prompters
official
zeal
time
might
come
scandals
exceed
scandals
violation
even
permit
informer
recover
actually
informed
seems
evil
result
unintended
act
interpretation
means
government
institute
criminal
action
subject
seizure
interloper
thereby
wrests
control
course
government
lawyers
without
experience
practicalities
know
trial
criminal
case
wrecked
issues
civil
side
particularly
civil
trial
conducted
interested
criminal
prosecution
trial
taking
depositions
devices
informer
may
force
premature
disclosure
government
case
certain
collusion
one
acts
informer
party
guilty
fraud
latter
obtain
disclosure
case
know
chance
conviction
may
well
prejudiced
defendant
may
go
jury
point
pending
proceedings
adequate
reparations
made
every
person
prosecuted
crime
part
strategy
defeating
conviction
wants
civil
actions
brought
oftentimes
wants
confess
settle
order
plead
squared
accounts
law
moreover
know
assets
men
engaged
criminal
activities
rarely
equal
discharge
obligations
event
sharing
available
assets
informer
government
financial
recovery
diminished
also
found
necessary
vest
someone
power
compromise
claims
government
either
doubtful
collectibility
claim
questionable
validity
becomes
attorney
general
control
litigation
respect
informer
may
admitted
share
control
case
may
act
collusion
guilty
party
may
longer
make
compromise
case
withstand
subsequent
attack
informer
must
borne
mind
case
adhering
construction
statute
continuously
applied
long
life
event
unlikely
join
colleagues
however
case
new
construction
upon
statute
one
farfetched
member
bar
ever
ventured
offer
reported
case
hold
rich
rewards
kind
proceeding
reserved
actually
good
faith
contributed
something
enforcement
law
protection
footnotes
nature
collusive
bidding
scheme
described
follows
appellants
officers
members
electrical
contractors
association
pittsburgh
conspired
rig
bidding
projects
pattern
collusion
informal
private
averaging
prospective
bid
might
submitted
appellant
appellant
chosen
others
submit
bid
averaged
amount
others
submitted
higher
estimates
government
thereby
defrauded
compelled
contribute
electric
work
projects
required
pay
free
competition
open
market
section
includes
three
categories
acts
subject
penalty
prescribes
first
clauses
opinion
governs
instant
case
covers
person
makes
causes
made
presents
causes
presented
payment
approval
person
officer
civil
military
naval
service
claim
upon
government
department
officer
thereof
knowing
claim
false
fictitious
fraudulent
second
clause
governs
use
false
certificates
purpose
obtaining
aiding
obtain
payment
claim
third
covers
conspiracy
defraud
government
obtaining
aiding
obtain
payment
claim
section
amendments
relevant
actions
appears
cf
mcmullen
hoffman
general
federal
competitive
bidding
statute
see
providing
actions
common
informer
interest
whatever
controversy
given
statute
existence
hundreds
years
england
country
ever
since
foundation
government
marvin
trout
statutes
arming
vessels
friendly
powers
breaches
duty
treasurer
register
protection
indians
see
infra
statute
dealing
allocation
costs
penal
actions
brought
informer
see
statutes
providing
reward
informers
specifically
either
authorize
forbid
informer
institute
action
construed
authorize
sue
adams
woods
cranch
support
view
see
taft
stevens
lith
eng
cf
griswold
speaking
section
says
statute
remedial
one
intended
protect
treasury
hungry
unscrupulous
host
encompasses
every
side
construed
accordingly
passed
upon
theory
based
experience
old
modern
civilization
one
least
expensive
effective
means
preventing
frauds
treasury
make
perpetrators
liable
actions
private
persons
acting
please
strong
stimulus
personal
ill
hope
gain
prosecutions
conducted
means
compare
ordinary
methods
enterprising
privateer
public
vessel
key
administration
federal
grants
introduction
bureau
census
state
local
government
special
study
federal
state
aid
see
key
supra
chapter
audit
congressional
globe
course
reason
congress
chosen
provided
specifically
amount
new
information
informer
must
produce
entitled
reward
simple
informers
merely
give
information
without
formally
instituting
actions
may
collect
award
aiding
conviction
narcotic
law
violators
directed
cf
authority
secretary
labor
authorized
approve
awards
informers
contract
labor
cases
right
action
may
subject
control
administrative
official
actions
concerning
violations
shipping
laws
cong
globe
supra
consideration
apparently
directed
solely
department
justice
desire
control
institution
actions
rather
settlement
sec
provides
informer
suits
withdrawn
discontinued
without
consent
writing
judge
district
attorney
first
filed
case
setting
forth
reasons
consent
authority
thus
given
district
attorney
presumably
aimed
prevention
fraudulent
settlements
discussion
situation
gave
rise
act
see
report
house
committee
government
contracts
march
discussion
senate
bill
cong
globe
supra
et
seq
opinion
randall
civil
war
reconstruction
meeker
lehigh
valley
railroad
sustained
validity
sections
interstate
commerce
act
authorized
payment
attorney
fees
shippers
injured
result
violation
act
railroads
cong
globe
supra
see
also
ozawa
helvering
new
york
trust
cooper
cf
cooper