mills
maryland
argued
march
decided
june
petitioner
maryland
prison
inmate
tried
jury
convicted
murder
cellmate
trial
sentencing
phase
jury
found
state
established
statutory
aggravating
factor
petitioner
committed
murder
confined
correctional
institution
marked
beside
mitigating
circumstance
referenced
verdict
form
thereby
requiring
imposition
death
penalty
maryland
capital
sentencing
scheme
petitioner
challenged
sentence
ground
maryland
statute
applied
unconstitutionally
mandatory
asserted
statute
explained
jury
instructions
implemented
verdict
form
required
imposition
death
sentence
jury
unanimously
found
aggravating
circumstance
agree
unanimously
existence
particular
mitigating
circumstance
thus
even
jurors
believe
mitigating
circumstance
circumstances
present
unless
unanimously
agree
existence
mitigating
factor
sentence
necessarily
death
maryland
appeals
concluded
death
sentence
constitutionally
sound
interpreting
statute
unanimity
requirement
applying
jury
determinations
critical
issues
including
acceptance
rejection
mitigating
circumstances
observed
verdict
form
regarded
requiring
jury
agree
unanimously
order
mark
respect
existence
mitigating
circumstance
trial
judge
instructions
stressed
need
unanimity
issues
presented
concluded
jury
agree
unanimously
accept
reject
particular
mitigating
circumstance
answer
circumstance
verdict
form
left
blank
jury
proceed
balancing
phase
juror
weigh
mitigating
circumstances
found
established
balance
aggravating
circumstances
unanimously
found
held
capital
case
sentencer
may
precluded
considering
mitigating
factor
relevant
circumstance
including
aspect
defendant
character
record
circumstances
offense
defendant
proffers
basis
sentence
less
death
maryland
statute
sentencer
finds
mitigating
circumstances
proved
exist
proceeds
decide
whether
circumstances
outweigh
aggravating
circumstances
petitioner
correct
jury
unanimously
agree
existence
single
mitigating
circumstance
may
give
mitigating
evidence
effect
whatsoever
must
impose
death
sentence
interpretation
correct
case
must
remanded
resentencing
pp
substantial
probability
reasonable
jurors
upon
receiving
judge
instructions
case
attempting
complete
verdict
form
instructed
well
may
thought
precluded
considering
mitigating
evidence
unless
jurors
agreed
existence
particular
mitigating
circumstance
jury
understood
mark
verdict
form
failed
agree
unanimously
mitigating
circumstance
existed
jurors
might
prevented
considering
factors
might
call
less
severe
penalty
petitioner
death
sentence
stand
pp
respect
findings
guilt
jury
verdict
must
set
aside
supported
one
ground
another
reviewing
uncertain
two
grounds
relied
upon
jury
reaching
verdict
review
death
sentences
demands
even
greater
certainty
jury
conclusions
rested
proper
grounds
pp
appeals
construction
jury
instructions
verdict
form
plausible
concluded
degree
certainty
jury
adopt
petitioner
interpretation
instead
nothing
verdict
form
judge
instructions
even
arguably
construable
suggesting
jury
leave
answer
blank
proceed
next
step
deliberations
jury
following
instructions
set
verdict
form
precluded
considering
mitigating
evidence
single
juror
adhered
view
evidence
considered
pp
extrinsic
evidence
jury
case
actually
thought
portions
record
relating
verdict
form
judge
instructions
indicate
least
substantial
risk
jury
misinformed
moreover
since
time
case
decided
appeals
promulgated
new
verdict
form
expressly
covering
situation
lack
unanimity
existence
nonexistence
particular
mitigating
factor
providing
consideration
mitigating
evidence
determining
sentence
shows
least
concern
part
juries
misunderstand
previous
instructions
unanimity
consideration
mitigating
evidence
individual
jurors
pp
blackmun
delivered
opinion
brennan
white
marshall
stevens
joined
brennan
post
white
post
filed
concurring
opinions
rehnquist
filed
dissenting
opinion
scalia
kennedy
joined
post
george
burns
argued
cause
petitioner
brief
alan
murrell
michael
braudes
julia
doyle
bernhardt
charles
monk
ii
deputy
attorney
general
maryland
argued
cause
respondent
brief
joseph
curran
attorney
general
gary
bair
richard
rosenblatt
assistant
attorneys
general
julius
chambers
richard
burr
iii
deborah
fins
anthony
amsterdam
filed
brief
naacp
legal
defense
educational
fund
amicus
curiae
urging
reversal
justice
blackmun
delivered
opinion
petitioner
seeks
review
decision
maryland
highest
construes
state
capital
sentencing
scheme
manner
preserves
constitutionality
may
evident
jury
charged
sentencing
function
case
reason
believe
jury
also
arrived
saving
construction
must
vacate
sentence
death
remand
case
resentencing
petitioner
ralph
mills
tried
jury
convicted
murder
cellmate
maryland
correctional
institution
hagerstown
jury
found
petitioner
repeatedly
stabbed
victim
shank
homemade
knife
sentencing
phase
trial
jury
found
state
established
one
statutory
aggravating
circumstance
propounded
namely
petitioner
committed
murder
time
confined
correctional
institution
app
defense
counsel
sought
persuade
jury
presence
certain
mitigating
circumstances
particular
petitioner
relative
youth
mental
infirmity
lack
future
dangerousness
state
failure
make
meaningful
attempt
rehabilitate
petitioner
incarcerated
verdict
form
provided
trial
pursuant
since
rescinded
maryland
rule
procedure
jury
marked
beside
referenced
mitigating
circumstance
returned
sentence
death
petitioner
challenged
conviction
sentence
various
grounds
including
argument
maryland
statute
md
ann
code
art
applied
unconstitutionally
mandatory
petitioner
construed
statute
explained
jury
instructions
implemented
verdict
form
require
imposition
death
sentence
jury
unanimously
found
aggravating
circumstance
agree
unanimously
existence
particular
mitigating
circumstance
according
petitioner
view
even
jurors
believe
mitigating
circumstance
circumstances
present
unless
unanimously
agree
existence
mitigating
factor
sentence
necessarily
death
maryland
appeals
concluded
imposition
petitioner
death
sentence
constitutionally
sound
md
dispute
statute
form
read
petitioner
suggested
jurors
improperly
prevented
giving
due
consideration
mitigating
evidence
however
interpreted
statute
differently
held
requirement
unanimity
applied
jury
determinations
critical
issues
including
acceptance
rejection
mitigating
circumstances
observing
verdict
form
regarded
requiring
jury
agree
unanimously
order
mark
respect
existence
mitigating
circumstance
trial
judge
instructions
stressed
need
unanimity
issues
presented
absence
unanimity
ultimate
question
sentence
imposed
statute
required
imposition
life
imprisonment
see
thus
view
long
one
juror
believes
exists
mitigating
factor
factor
outweighed
aggravating
circumstances
juror
continues
adhere
position
sentence
death
statutory
scheme
appeals
recognized
however
statute
fully
provide
transpire
unanimity
lacking
various
stages
sentencing
deliberation
concluding
state
legislature
intend
jury
deadlock
impose
life
sentence
whenever
agree
unanimously
accept
reject
particular
mitigating
circumstance
pursuant
statutory
authority
fill
gaps
sentencing
process
see
appeals
instructed
jury
proceed
balancing
stage
leaving
answer
circumstance
blank
directed
juror
weigh
mitigating
circumstances
found
established
balance
aggravating
circumstances
unanimously
found
jury
dissenting
judge
sharply
disagreed
majority
view
state
legislature
intended
make
rejection
mitigating
circumstance
kind
ultimate
issue
requires
unanimity
observed
law
generally
requires
unanimity
verdicts
alternative
predicate
historic
fact
support
verdict
dissent
also
concluded
probable
least
reasonably
possible
jury
understood
answer
verdict
form
represented
failure
find
unanimously
existence
circumstance
rather
unanimous
determination
circumstance
exist
importance
issue
maryland
scheme
granted
certiorari
ii
petitioner
argument
straightforward
well
illustrated
hypothetical
situation
contends
possible
maryland
capital
sentencing
scheme
eleven
jurors
agree
six
mitigating
circumstances
result
mitigating
circumstance
found
consequently
nothing
weigh
aggravating
circumstance
found
judgment
death
even
though
eleven
jurors
think
death
penalty
wholly
inappropriate
brief
petitioner
although
jury
discretion
must
guided
appropriately
objective
standards
see
godfrey
georgia
plurality
opinion
certainly
height
arbitrariness
allow
require
imposition
death
penalty
circumstances
postulated
petitioner
dissent
beyond
dispute
capital
case
sentencer
may
precluded
considering
mitigating
factor
aspect
defendant
character
record
circumstances
offense
defendant
proffers
basis
sentence
less
death
eddings
oklahoma
quoting
lockett
ohio
plurality
opinion
emphasis
original
see
skipper
south
carolina
corollary
sentencer
may
refuse
consider
precluded
considering
relevant
mitigating
evidence
equally
well
established
ibid
emphasis
added
quoting
eddings
maryland
sentencing
scheme
sentencer
finds
mitigating
circumstance
circumstances
proved
exist
proceeds
decide
whether
mitigating
circumstances
outweigh
aggravating
circumstances
sentences
defendant
accordingly
petitioner
correct
jury
unanimously
agree
existence
mitigating
circumstance
may
give
mitigating
evidence
effect
whatsoever
must
impose
sentence
death
see
decisions
relevant
whether
barrier
sentencer
consideration
mitigating
evidence
interposed
statute
lockett
ohio
supra
hitchcock
dugger
sentencing
eddings
oklahoma
supra
evidentiary
ruling
skipper
south
carolina
supra
must
true
respect
single
juror
holdout
vote
finding
presence
mitigating
circumstance
whatever
cause
petitioner
interpretation
sentencing
process
correct
conclusion
necessarily
sentencer
failure
consider
mitigating
evidence
risks
erroneous
imposition
death
sentence
plain
violation
lockett
duty
remand
case
resentencing
eddings
oklahoma
concurring
iii
critical
question
whether
petitioner
interpretation
sentencing
process
one
reasonable
jury
drawn
instructions
given
trial
judge
verdict
form
employed
case
see
francis
franklin
question
state
declares
meaning
charge
rather
reasonable
juror
understood
charge
meaning
citing
sandstrom
montana
accord
california
brown
jury
understood
verdict
form
appeals
asserted
every
time
marked
beside
mitigating
circumstance
indicated
unanimous
conclusion
petitioner
proved
relevant
facts
preponderance
evidence
thus
properly
upheld
judgment
hand
jury
understood
mark
failed
agree
unanimously
mitigating
circumstance
existed
jurors
prevented
considering
factors
may
call
less
severe
penalty
lockett
ohio
petitioner
sentence
stand
respect
findings
guilt
criminal
charges
consistently
followed
rule
jury
verdict
must
set
aside
supported
one
ground
another
reviewing
uncertain
two
grounds
relied
upon
jury
reaching
verdict
see
yates
stromberg
california
reviewing
death
sentences
demanded
even
greater
certainty
jury
conclusions
rested
proper
grounds
see
lockett
ohio
risk
death
penalty
imposed
spite
factors
may
call
less
severe
penalty
unacceptable
incompatible
commands
eighth
fourteenth
amendments
andres
reasonable
men
might
derive
meaning
instructions
given
proper
meaning
probable
death
cases
doubts
presented
resolved
favor
accused
accord
zant
stephens
unless
rule
substantial
possibility
jury
may
rested
verdict
improper
ground
must
remand
resentencing
conceding
appeals
construction
jury
instructions
verdict
form
plausible
conclude
degree
certainty
jury
adopt
petitioner
interpretation
jury
instructions
verdict
form
conclusion
sentencing
phase
judge
distributed
copies
form
jurors
form
reproduced
entirety
answers
given
appendix
opinion
reading
aloud
instruction
part
form
section
stressing
unanimity
requirement
judge
explained
ou
must
consider
whether
aggravating
circumstance
number
two
proven
beyond
reasonable
doubt
unanimously
conclude
proven
answer
question
yes
satisfied
course
must
answer
app
emphasis
added
find
difficult
read
statement
requirement
answer
like
yes
answer
must
unanimous
indeed
verdict
form
establishes
least
rough
equivalence
lack
unanimity
write
yes
writing
jury
learns
form
failure
write
yes
beside
aggravating
circumstance
leads
imposition
life
sentence
result
obtains
jury
answers
every
aggravating
circumstance
judge
moved
section
ii
form
addresses
jury
determination
mitigating
circumstances
exist
language
beginning
section
identical
beginning
section
except
standard
proof
preponderance
evidence
rather
beyond
reasonable
doubt
see
appendix
opinion
post
presume
unless
instructed
contrary
jury
read
similar
language
throughout
form
consistently
jury
instructed
mark
answer
yes
although
clear
jury
mark
yes
box
without
unanimity
nothing
judge
said
dispelled
probable
inference
opposite
yes
therefore
appropriate
answer
reflect
inability
answer
question
affirmative
nothing
verdict
form
judge
instructions
even
arguably
construable
suggesting
jury
leave
answer
blank
proceed
next
stage
deliberations
place
form
jury
opportunity
write
anything
yes
respect
mitigating
circumstance
number
eight
see
appendix
opinion
post
permits
jury
recognize
mitigating
anything
addition
enumerated
mitigating
factors
petitioner
offered
basis
sentence
less
death
judge
explained
jury
found
mitigating
circumstances
must
list
space
provided
find
mitigating
circumstance
make
entry
upon
lines
number
eight
app
instruction
given
indicating
jury
jurors
willing
recognize
something
petitioner
background
circumstances
crime
mitigating
factor
ordinarily
maryland
jury
reaches
balancing
stage
deliberation
process
time
unanimously
finds
least
one
mitigating
circumstance
interpretation
adopted
appeals
case
time
jury
unanimously
reject
mitigating
circumstances
jurors
sentenced
petitioner
reached
section
iii
found
even
read
verdict
form
appeals
suggests
marked
yes
basis
unanimity
either
free
point
consider
relevant
evidence
mitigation
balanced
aggravating
mitigating
circumstances
section
iii
instructed
jury
weigh
mitigating
circumstances
marked
yes
section
ii
mitigating
circumstance
marked
even
unanimously
rejected
considered
juror
jury
following
instructions
set
verdict
form
precluded
considering
mitigating
factor
aspect
defendant
character
record
circumstanc
offense
defendant
proffer
ed
basis
sentence
less
death
skipper
south
carolina
even
single
juror
adhered
view
factor
considered
course
extrinsic
evidence
jury
case
actually
thought
us
verdict
form
judge
instructions
reading
parts
record
leads
us
conclude
least
substantial
risk
jury
misinformed
dissenting
judge
astounded
majority
reading
statute
verdict
form
said
appears
blue
nearly
ten
years
extensive
litigation
involving
statute
looking
evidence
jury
interpretation
available
dissent
noted
sentencing
forms
completed
capital
cases
death
penalty
imposed
answer
existence
mitigating
circumstances
ever
left
blank
one
additional
bit
evidence
natural
interpretation
form
become
available
since
case
decided
june
emergency
basis
appeals
promulgated
new
findings
sentencing
determination
form
see
md
rule
proc
amended
july
effective
new
form
expressly
incorporates
unanimity
requirement
accepting
rejecting
aggravating
circumstances
significantly
however
section
concerning
mitigating
circumstances
completely
rewritten
changed
statutory
mitigating
circumstance
jury
asked
choose
among
three
options
mark
one
unanimously
find
preponderance
evidence
circumstance
exists
unanimously
find
preponderance
evidence
circumstance
exist
reasonable
period
deliberation
one
us
fewer
find
preponderance
evidence
circumstance
exists
md
ann
code
md
rules
vol
pp
respect
consideration
mitigating
evidence
weighing
balancing
process
new
verdict
form
instructs
jurors
follows
jury
unanimously
determines
section
iii
mitigating
circumstances
exist
complete
section
iv
proceed
section
enter
death
jury
juror
determines
one
mitigating
circumstances
exist
complete
section
iv
ibid
emphasis
added
individual
juror
shall
weigh
aggravating
circumstances
found
unanimously
exist
mitigating
circumstances
found
unanimously
exist
well
mitigating
circumstances
found
individual
juror
exist
ibid
emphasis
added
one
member
jury
sentenced
ralph
mills
similarly
instructed
jury
maryland
say
degree
confidence
interpretation
mills
jury
adopted
common
sense
little
extrinsic
evidence
possess
suggest
juries
leave
blanks
report
deadlocked
mitigating
circumstances
reasonable
deliberation
see
tr
oral
arg
unless
expressly
instructed
decision
exercise
power
state
execute
defendant
unlike
decision
citizens
public
officials
called
upon
make
evolving
standards
societal
decency
imposed
correspondingly
high
requirement
reliability
determination
death
appropriate
penalty
particular
case
possibility
petitioner
jury
conducted
task
improperly
certainly
great
enough
require
resentencing
iv
conclude
substantial
probability
reasonable
jurors
upon
receiving
judge
instructions
case
attempting
complete
verdict
form
instructed
well
may
thought
precluded
considering
mitigating
evidence
unless
jurors
agreed
existence
particular
circumstance
cases
sentencer
must
permitted
consider
mitigating
evidence
possibility
single
juror
block
consideration
consequently
require
jury
impose
death
penalty
one
dare
risk
therefore
vacate
judgment
appeals
insofar
sustained
imposition
death
penalty
case
remanded
proceedings
inconsistent
opinion
ordered
appendix
opinion
findings
sentence
determination
form
employed
petitioner
trial
section
based
upon
evidence
unanimously
find
following
aggravating
circumstances
marked
yes
proven
beyond
reasonable
doubt
aggravating
circumstance
marked
proven
beyond
reasonable
doubt
victim
law
enforcement
officer
murdered
performance
duties
defendant
committed
murder
time
confined
correctional
institution
defendant
committed
murder
furtherance
escape
attempt
escape
evade
lawful
custody
arrest
detention
officer
guard
correctional
institution
law
enforcement
officer
victim
hostage
taken
attempted
taken
course
kidnapping
abduction
attempt
kidnap
abduct
victim
child
abducted
violation
code
article
defendant
committed
murder
pursuant
agreement
contract
remuneration
promise
remuneration
commit
murder
defendant
engaged
employed
another
person
commit
murder
murder
committed
pursuant
agreement
contract
remuneration
promise
remuneration
time
murder
defendant
sentence
death
imprisonment
life
defendant
committed
one
offense
murder
first
degree
arising
incident
defendant
committed
murder
committing
attempting
commit
robbery
arson
rape
sexual
offense
first
degree
one
marked
yes
complete
section
ii
marked
complete
sections
ii
iii
section
ii
based
upon
evidence
unanimously
find
following
mitigating
circumstances
marked
yes
proven
exist
preponderance
evidence
mitigating
circumstance
marked
proven
preponderance
evidence
defendant
previously
found
guilty
crime
violence
ii
entered
plea
guilty
nolo
contendere
charge
crime
violence
iii
granted
probation
stay
entry
judgment
pursuant
charge
crime
violence
used
paragraph
crime
violence
means
abduction
arson
escape
kidnapping
manslaughter
except
involuntary
manslaughter
mayhem
murder
robbery
rape
sexual
offense
first
second
degree
attempt
commit
offenses
use
handgun
commission
felony
another
crime
violence
victim
participant
defendant
conduct
consented
act
caused
victim
death
defendant
acted
substantial
duress
domination
provocation
another
person
substantial
constitute
complete
defense
prosecution
murder
committed
capacity
defendant
appreciate
criminality
conduct
conform
conduct
requirements
law
substantially
impaired
result
mental
incapacity
mental
disorder
emotional
disturbance
youthful
age
defendant
time
crime
act
defendant
sole
proximate
cause
victim
death
unlikely
defendant
engage
criminal
activity
constitute
continuing
threat
society
mitigating
circumstances
exist
set
forth
one
section
ii
marked
yes
complete
section
iii
section
ii
marked
complete
section
iii
section
iii
based
evidence
unanimously
find
proven
preponderance
evidence
mitigating
circumstances
marked
yes
section
ii
outweigh
aggravating
circumstances
marked
yes
section
yes
determination
sentence
enter
determination
sentence
either
life
imprisonment
death
according
following
instructions
answers
section
marked
enter
life
imprisonment
section
iii
completed
marked
yes
enter
life
imprisonment
section
ii
completed
answers
marked
enter
death
section
iii
completed
marked
enter
death
unanimously
determine
sentence
death
app
footnotes
jury
instructed
report
conclusions
findings
sentence
determination
form
called
rule
prior
petitioner
sentencing
rule
replaced
maryland
rule
procedure
stipulated
use
form
similar
one
used
case
dissent
noted
form
provided
rule
used
petitioner
trial
concluded
prejudice
resulted
petitioner
use
similar
incorrect
form
md
petitioner
raised
objection
use
outdated
form
opposed
form
form
actually
used
petitioner
trial
answers
given
set
entirety
appendix
opinion
appeals
maryland
disposed
claim
merits
despite
petitioner
failure
see
app
tr
oral
arg
object
verdict
form
jury
instructions
sentencing
proceeding
presumably
appeals
found
appropriate
either
review
plain
error
see
generally
wright
federal
practice
procedure
ed
concluded
maryland
law
otherwise
bar
petitioner
claim
event
view
maryland
review
merits
jurisdiction
federal
constitutional
question
established
see
orr
orr
franks
delaware
note
passing
counsel
petitioner
filed
pretrial
motion
asserted
generally
article
section
maryland
rule
unconstitutionally
restrict
discretion
finder
fact
determining
whether
death
penalty
imposed
record
time
petitioner
trial
provided
jury
within
reasonable
time
able
agree
sentence
shall
dismiss
jury
impose
sentence
imprisonment
life
see
md
laws
ch
effective
july
amended
read
jury
within
reasonable
time
able
agree
whether
sentence
death
shall
imposed
may
impose
sentence
death
perceive
nothing
significant
petitioner
case
amendment
section
affords
convicted
capital
defendant
choice
sentencing
judge
jury
case
petitioner
invoked
right
sentenced
jury
discussion
maryland
sentencing
scheme
limited
context
indeed
appeals
contemplated
two
alternative
lawful
consequences
lack
unanimity
accept
reject
mitigating
circumstance
jury
deadlock
requiring
imposition
life
sentence
prescribed
jury
proceed
balancing
stage
juror
consider
evidence
mitigation
reach
conclusion
whether
death
penalty
warranted
one
argued
maryland
appeals
suggest
mitigating
evidence
rendered
legally
irrelevant
one
holdout
vote
maryland
law
jury
free
stage
decide
relevant
facts
even
proved
mitigating
effect
decision
already
made
state
legislature
see
see
also
tr
oral
arg
jury
discretion
attaching
significance
presence
mitigating
circumstances
properly
exercised
subsequent
balancing
stage
process
see
andres
construed
federal
statute
required
imposition
death
penalty
murder
unless
guilty
verdict
qualified
addition
phrase
without
capital
punishment
see
concluded
statute
required
jury
unanimous
guilt
whether
death
penalty
imposed
rather
government
contended
requiring
death
penalty
imposed
unless
jury
unanimously
agreed
impose
qualification
appeals
ninth
circuit
also
rejected
government
contention
arrived
construction
statute
similar
found
jury
instructions
conveyed
proper
construction
jury
disagreed
finding
instructions
jury
received
might
reasonably
conclude
agree
grant
mercy
verdict
guilt
must
stand
unqualified
find
puzzling
dissent
citation
post
jurek
texas
white
concurring
judgment
case
upheld
different
sentencing
procedure
followed
texas
juries
indeed
may
capable
understanding
issues
posed
capital
sentencing
proceedings
must
first
properly
instructed
dissent
ably
reports
trial
judge
stressed
ver
post
jury
findings
unanimous
instructions
trial
explain
jury
reach
unanimity
answer
yes
something
answer
dissent
like
trial
confuses
repetition
clarity
pronouncing
one
way
jury
understood
instructions
see
post
even
maryland
appeals
believed
see
infra
conclusion
section
ii
instructions
effect
failure
answer
yes
question
obtained
consequence
answering
questions
one
section
two
marked
yes
go
section
three
section
two
marked
complete
section
three
app
jury
case
apparently
never
reached
balancing
stage
process
jury
returned
courtroom
report
verdict
even
judge
confused
failure
complete
section
iii
accordance
form
instructions
see
app
prosecutor
suggested
colloquy
jurors
hung
language
ibid
example
jurors
case
might
found
petitioner
age
constituted
mitigating
factor
youthfulness
indeed
sentencing
report
trial
judge
noted
evidence
jury
found
existence
mitigating
circumstance
youthful
age
app
jurors
hand
might
accepted
prosecutor
argument
petitioner
youthful
terms
criminal
justice
system
history
criminal
activity
circumstances
lack
unanimity
prevented
jury
marking
answer
yes
regardless
whether
answer
marked
left
blank
instructions
section
iii
prevent
jurors
thought
petitioner
youthfulness
relevant
ultimate
sentencing
decision
giving
mitigating
circumstance
weight
petitioner
lodged
copies
sentencing
forms
used
two
cases
state
new
sentencing
form
appears
made
significant
difference
jury
found
one
aggravating
circumstance
failed
agree
mitigating
circumstance
however
report
three
statutory
mitigating
circumstances
found
one
fewer
jurors
jury
also
articulated
three
nonstatutory
mitigating
circumstances
found
one
jurors
jury
reported
unanimously
find
aggravating
circumstances
marked
proven
outweighed
mitigating
circumstances
unanimously
fixed
sentence
life
imprisonment
see
findings
sentencing
determination
cty
prince
george
doering
state
jury
used
verdict
form
apparently
containing
aspects
old
new
forms
jurors
instructed
event
one
found
mitigating
circumstance
agreed
leave
answer
blank
jury
exercised
option
respect
one
statutory
mitigating
circumstance
jury
also
articulated
additional
nonstatutory
mitigating
circumstance
found
one
jurors
upon
balancing
aggravating
mitigating
circumstances
jury
sentenced
defendant
death
see
findings
sentencing
determination
cty
baltimore
conclusion
issue
sufficient
dispose
case
refrain
review
appeals
sua
sponte
declaration
see
victim
impact
statement
introduced
evidence
contravention
decision
last
term
booth
maryland
justice
brennan
concurring
join
opinion
agree
fully
analysis
current
death
penalty
jurisprudence
death
sentence
case
must
vacated
write
separately
judgment
without
prejudice
sentencing
proceedings
expressly
preclude
reimposition
death
penalty
adhering
view
death
penalty
circumstances
cruel
unusual
punishment
prohibited
eighth
fourteenth
amendments
gregg
georgia
direct
resentencing
proceedings
circumscribed
state
may
reimpose
death
sentence
justice
white
concurring
issue
case
reasonable
jurors
understood
applied
instructions
issue
opinion
addresses
persuaded
reaches
correct
solution
hence
join
opinion
chief
justice
rehnquist
justice
justice
scalia
justice
kennedy
join
dissenting
decides
sentence
imposed
maryland
jury
constitutionally
infirm
certain
juror
understood
sentencing
instructions
charges
jury
last
term
california
brown
reaffirmed
view
relevant
inquiry
whether
impermissible
interpretation
instructions
jury
however
improbable
literally
possible
instead
reasonable
juror
understood
charge
meaning
think
instructions
charges
jury
case
pass
test
affirm
petitioner
sentence
well
conviction
petitioner
already
serving
sentence
murder
committed
stabbed
cellmate
times
chest
times
back
homemade
knife
petitioner
threatened
kill
cellmate
several
weeks
earlier
numerous
demands
met
prison
warden
august
made
good
threat
evidence
trial
strongly
suggested
brutal
assault
unprovoked
initiated
victim
asleep
finding
petitioner
guilty
murder
maryland
jury
hearing
case
proceeded
sentencing
phase
trial
part
sentencing
process
jury
provided
standard
sentencing
form
although
sentencing
form
reproduced
appendix
majority
opinion
believe
useful
review
instructions
charges
confronted
jurors
section
sentencing
form
requires
jurors
unanimously
determine
whether
several
aggravating
circumstances
existed
jurors
unanimously
found
defendant
committed
murder
time
confined
correctional
institution
app
reaching
decision
jury
moved
section
ii
form
began
based
upon
evidence
unanimously
find
following
mitigating
circumstances
marked
yes
proven
exist
preponderance
evidence
mitigating
circumstance
marked
proven
preponderance
evidence
appendix
opinion
ante
jury
negative
responses
examined
light
directions
section
ii
admit
one
reasonable
interpretation
jury
unanimously
found
mitigating
factors
existed
weighed
aggravating
circumstance
unanimously
determined
present
reasonable
juror
understood
charge
meaning
absolutely
reason
think
meaning
abundantly
plain
jurors
acting
instructions
instructions
serve
understandable
guide
jury
deliberations
accompanied
additional
charges
trial
judge
although
ignores
several
charges
think
open
doubt
reinforce
jury
understanding
must
unanimously
reach
decision
question
proceeding
next
distributing
sentencing
forms
trial
judge
delivered
following
charges
let
remind
reaching
determination
issues
raised
case
presented
sentencing
form
verdict
must
unanimous
twelve
must
agree
find
existence
unanimously
beyond
reasonable
doubt
aggravating
circumstance
number
two
mark
yes
proceed
section
two
begins
top
page
two
provides
based
upon
evidence
unanimously
find
following
mitigating
circumstances
marked
yes
proven
exist
preponderance
evidence
mitigating
circumstance
marked
proven
preponderance
evidence
stress
finding
mitigating
circumstances
must
unanimous
must
agree
let
stress
requirement
unanimity
finding
section
two
findings
section
three
must
one
twelve
agree
let
remind
burdens
proof
defined
requirement
verdict
decision
regard
items
must
unanimous
let
remind
consider
circumstances
must
indicate
yes
however
unanimous
decision
falls
emphasis
added
also
little
uncertain
standard
majority
purports
employ
finding
jury
may
understood
instructions
intended
california
brown
held
correct
inquiry
situation
reasonable
juror
understood
charge
meaning
quoting
francis
franklin
see
also
sandstrom
montana
thus
brown
found
reasonable
juror
reject
construction
jury
charge
advanced
defendant
instead
understand
trial
judge
instruction
rely
mere
sympathy
directive
ignore
sort
sympathy
totally
divorced
evidence
adduced
penalty
phase
similarly
jurek
texas
majority
concluded
issues
arising
texas
sentencing
proceeding
core
meaning
criminal
juries
capable
understanding
white
concurring
judgment
agreeing
joint
opinion
stewart
powell
stevens
jurek
demonstrates
interpretation
reasonable
juror
give
instructions
trial
determinative
element
review
reason
reliance
lockett
ohio
eddings
oklahoma
misplaced
issue
whether
jurors
permitted
hear
extenuating
evidence
petitioner
cared
present
undoubtedly
rather
brown
jurek
question
whether
reasonable
juror
operating
trial
instructions
considered
evidence
mitigating
circumstances
constitutional
manner
present
case
reasonable
juror
understand
mark
mitigating
factor
sentencing
form
jurors
must
agree
language
section
ii
form
coupled
repeated
instructions
trial
judge
leaves
doubt
answer
affirmative
ecause
reason
believe
jury
also
arrived
proper
interpretation
sentencing
form
petitioner
sentence
must
vacated
case
remanded
resentencing
ante
also
proposes
nless
rule
substantial
possibility
jury
may
rested
verdict
improper
construction
sentencing
instructions
jury
charges
petitioner
sentence
must
set
aside
ante
formulation
obscures
considerably
view
correct
standard
set
forth
brown
short
ordering
separate
trial
investigate
knowledge
juror
discussions
among
envision
method
ever
attain
level
certainty
majority
insists
jury
deliberations
nature
secret
mental
processes
individual
jurors
equally
recondite
demand
degree
assurance
conducting
judicial
review
jury
proceedings
establish
standard
never
satisfied
preceding
discussion
indicates
reasonable
juror
standard
employed
instructions
sentencing
form
charges
given
jury
case
constitutionally
unexceptionable
petitioner
sentence
upheld
ii
since
majority
finds
dispositive
petitioner
argument
jurors
may
understood
unanimity
requirements
sentencing
instructions
jury
charges
reach
second
issue
case
see
ante
reject
challenge
instructions
must
continue
deal
petitioner
claim
trial
judge
improperly
allowed
evidence
statements
concerning
personal
characteristics
victim
paul
brown
violation
recent
decision
booth
maryland
although
petitioner
failed
object
trial
introduction
evidence
maryland
appeals
nonetheless
found
information
brown
constitute
proscribed
victim
impact
statement
issue
thus
properly
see
orr
orr
illinois
gates
mcgoldrick
compagnie
generale
transatlantique
uphold
appeals
determination
attached
maryland
division
parole
probation
investigation
report
crime
memorandum
state
attorney
summarized
interview
conducted
caseworker
victim
brother
petitioner
counsel
informed
read
memorandum
object
admission
trial
judge
allowed
evidence
entirety
memorandum
stated
paul
thomas
brown
came
family
six
young
age
removed
parents
sic
custody
neglect
placed
separate
foster
homes
removal
department
social
services
prompted
paul
hospitalized
age
anemia
malnutrition
paul
hyperactive
child
hard
handle
resulted
lot
beatings
various
guardians
ran
away
constantly
various
homes
placed
paul
age
started
living
streets
eventually
sent
maryland
training
school
boys
paul
never
really
home
family
thomas
brown
tried
keep
touch
paul
writing
visiting
whenever
possible
always
good
homes
good
life
always
felt
guilty
nothing
help
paul
one
year
older
paul
good
person
tough
life
lot
bad
breaks
family
home
nobody
really
give
chance
sometimes
think
felt
secure
prison
one
outside
sure
committed
crimes
violent
survive
got
involved
lot
bad
people
md
joined
dissents
booth
maryland
supra
continue
believe
case
wrongly
decided
virtually
limits
placed
mitigating
evidence
capital
defendant
may
introduce
concerning
history
circumstances
yet
state
precluded
demonstrating
loss
victim
family
society
whole
defendant
homicide
jury
assess
meaningfully
defendant
moral
culpability
blameworthiness
one
essential
consideration
extent
harm
caused
defendant
large
measure
decision
booth
prevents
jury
information
necessary
determine
proper
punishment
murder
even
accept
majority
rationale
booth
still
find
statements
victim
summarized
present
memorandum
correctly
admitted
evidence
victim
impact
statements
ruled
inadmissible
booth
addition
containing
information
elderly
couple
killed
defendant
also
included
substantial
material
concerning
effect
crime
victims
family
friends
loss
community
family
perceptions
defendant
contrast
summary
admitted
gave
barest
details
paul
brown
information
impact
death
others
interpret
booth
foreclosing
introduction
evidence
whatever
form
murder
victim
thus
conclude
trial
commit
error
admitting
summary
case
majority
attempts
backdoor
see
ante
explain
individual
juror
might
considered
persuasive
mitigating
circumstance
addition
pointing
fact
majority
evidence
support
hypothetical
reading
sentencing
form
imputes
jury
review
mitigating
factors
offered
petitioner
case
reveals
extraordinarily
weak
sentencing
petitioner
urged
youthful
age
weigh
favor
argued
despite
fact
murdered
twice
unlikely
engage
criminal
activity
constitute
continuing
threat
society
md
petitioner
also
asserted
extenuating
circumstance
failure
state
effectively
reform
view
vacuity
proffered
mitigating
factors
hardly
surprising
jury
unanimously
reject
seems
derive
support
fact
maryland
appeals
recently
modified
sentencing
form
see
ante
clarification
form
course
welcome
amendment
legal
relevance
decision
today
discussion
oral
argument
suggested
sentencing
instruction
constitutionally
acceptable
may
improved
number
ways
tr
oral
arg
determination
whether
sentencing
instructions
jury
charges
submitted
case
permissible
petitioner
however
challenge
maryland
appeals
decision
admissibility
evidence
victim
petition
certiorari
brief
see
pet
cert
brief
petitioner