seagram
sons
argued
december
decided
january
agreement
among
competitors
interstate
commerce
fix
maximum
resale
prices
products
violates
sherman
act
sherman
act
combination
formed
purpose
effect
raising
depressing
fixing
pegging
stabilizing
price
commodity
interstate
foreign
commerce
illegal
per
se
evidence
case
sufficient
support
finding
jury
respondents
conspired
fix
maximum
resale
prices
pp
action
sherman
act
treble
damages
brought
complainant
injured
conspiracy
sellers
liquor
interstate
commerce
fix
maximum
resale
prices
defense
complainant
conspired
others
fix
minimum
prices
liquor
violation
antitrust
laws
fact
corporations
common
ownership
control
relieve
liability
antitrust
laws
especially
hold
competitors
since
district
instructions
jury
submitted
cause
action
sherman
act
err
refusing
formal
withdrawal
issue
concerning
violation
clayton
act
charged
complaint
proved
reversed
action
sherman
act
treble
damages
jury
returned
verdict
petitioner
damages
awarded
appeals
reversed
granted
certiorari
reversed
joseph
daniels
paul
porter
argued
cause
filed
brief
petitioner
paul
davis
argued
cause
respondents
brief
joseph
hartfield
thomas
kiernan
solicitor
general
perlman
acting
assistant
attorney
general
underhill
charles
weston
filed
brief
amicus
curiae
supporting
petitioner
justice
black
delivered
opinion
petitioner
company
indiana
drug
concern
wholesale
liquor
business
respondents
seagram
calvert
corporations
affiliated
companies
sell
liquor
interstate
commerce
indiana
wholesalers
petitioner
brought
action
federal
district
treble
damages
sherman
act
complaint
charged
respondents
agreed
conspired
sell
liquor
indiana
wholesalers
resell
prices
fixed
seagram
calvert
agreement
deprived
petitioner
continuing
supply
liquor
great
damages
trial
evidence
introduced
tending
show
respondents
fixed
maximum
prices
wholesalers
resell
jury
returned
verdict
petitioner
damages
awarded
appeals
seventh
circuit
reversed
held
agreement
among
respondents
fix
maximum
resale
prices
violate
sherman
act
prices
promoted
rather
restrained
competition
also
held
evidence
insufficient
show
respondents
acted
concert
doubt
correctness
decision
questions
important
antitrust
litigation
prompted
us
grant
certiorari
appeals
erred
holding
agreement
among
competitors
fix
maximum
resale
prices
products
violate
sherman
act
agreements
less
fix
minimum
prices
cripple
freedom
traders
thereby
restrain
ability
sell
accordance
judgment
reaffirm
said
oil
sherman
act
combination
formed
purpose
effect
raising
depressing
fixing
pegging
stabilizing
price
commodity
interstate
foreign
commerce
illegal
per
se
appeals
also
erred
holding
evidence
insufficient
support
finding
jury
respondents
conspired
fix
maximum
resale
prices
jury
authorized
evidence
accept
following
facts
seagram
refused
sell
petitioner
others
unless
purchasers
agreed
maximum
resale
price
fixed
seagram
calvert
first
willing
sell
without
restrictive
condition
arrangements
made
petitioner
buy
large
quantities
calvert
liquor
petitioner
subsequently
informed
calvert
however
arrangements
carried
calvert
go
along
seagram
moreover
time
conferences
held
officials
respondents
concerning
sales
liquor
petitioner
thereafter
identical
terms
fixing
retail
prices
seagram
calvert
resumed
sales
indiana
wholesalers
agreed
abide
conditions
shipments
made
petitioner
foregoing
sufficient
justify
challenged
jury
finding
respondents
unity
purpose
common
design
understanding
forbade
purchasers
exceed
fixed
ceilings
thus
support
conclusion
conspiracy
existed
american
tobacco
even
though
respondents
point
testimony
record
indicating
price
policies
seagram
calvert
arrived
independently
respondents
also
seek
support
judgment
reversal
grounds
passed
appeals
argued
orally
briefs
grounds
raise
issues
law
calling
examination
appraisal
evidence
consider
respondents
introduced
evidence
district
designed
show
petitioner
agreed
indiana
wholesalers
set
minimum
prices
sale
liquor
violation
antitrust
laws
contended
trial
erred
charging
jury
petitioner
part
conspiracy
even
proved
defense
present
cause
action
hold
instruction
correct
seagram
calvert
acting
individually
perhaps
might
refused
deal
petitioner
indiana
wholesalers
sherman
act
makes
offense
respondents
agree
among
stop
selling
particular
customers
petitioner
others
guilty
infractions
antitrust
laws
held
responsible
appropriate
proceedings
brought
government
injured
private
persons
alleged
illegal
conduct
petitioner
however
legalize
unlawful
combination
respondents
immunize
liability
injured
cf
fashion
originators
guild
trade
mandeville
island
farms
american
crystal
sugar
respondents
next
suggest
status
mere
instrumentalities
single
unit
makes
impossible
conspired
manner
forbidden
sherman
act
suggestion
runs
counter
past
decisions
common
ownership
control
liberate
corporations
impact
antitrust
laws
yellow
cab
rule
especially
applicable
respondents
hold
competitors
also
claimed
district
improperly
refused
withdraw
jury
issue
respondents
violation
clayton
act
charged
complaint
proved
fair
reading
instructions
jury
however
reveals
trial
submitted
cause
action
sherman
act
convinced
record
formal
withdrawal
clayton
act
issue
served
solely
confuse
contentions
error
admission
evidence
charge
jury
devoid
merit
unnecessary
discuss
judgment
appeals
reversed
district
affirmed
ordered
petitioner
also
charged
violation
clayton
act
theory
abandoned
important
see
infra