palmer
hoffman
argued
decided
february
rehearing
denied
march
see
edward
brumley
new
york
city
petitioners
wm
paul
allen
new
york
city
respondent
justice
douglas
delivered
opinion
case
arose
grade
crossing
accident
occurred
massachusetts
diversity
citizenship
brought
federal
district
new
york
several
causes
action
first
two
behalf
respondent
individually
one
brought
massachusetts
statute
common
law
third
fourth
brought
respondent
administrator
estate
wife
alleged
common
law
statutory
negligence
first
two
counts
question
negligence
trial
submitted
three
issues
ring
bell
blow
whistle
light
burning
front
train
jury
returned
verdict
favor
respondent
individually
favor
respondent
administrator
district
entered
judgment
verdict
circuit
appeals
affirmed
one
judge
dissenting
case
petition
writ
certiorari
presents
three
points
accident
occurred
night
december
december
engineer
train
died
trial
made
statement
freight
office
petitioners
interviewed
assistant
superintendent
road
representative
massachusetts
public
utilities
commission
see
mass
statement
offered
evidence
petitioners
act
june
stat
offered
prove
language
act
statement
signed
regular
course
business
regular
course
business
make
statement
respondent
objection
introduction
sustained
agree
majority
view
properly
excluded
may
assume
statement
made
regular
course
business
satisfy
provisions
act
think
made
regular
course
business
within
meaning
act
business
petitioners
railroad
business
business
like
enterprises
entails
keeping
numerous
books
records
essential
conduct
useful
efficient
operation
though
books
records
considered
reliable
trustworthy
major
decisions
industrial
business
world
use
litigation
greatly
circumscribed
hedged
hearsay
greatly
increased
time
cost
making
proof
made
records
numerous
wigmore
evidence
problem
started
movement
towards
adoption
legislation
embodying
principles
present
act
see
morgan
et
law
evidence
proposals
reform
legislative
history
act
indicates
purpose
engineer
statement
held
inadmissible
case
falls
quite
different
category
record
made
systematic
conduct
business
business
accident
report
may
affect
business
sense
affords
information
management
may
act
however
typical
entries
made
systematically
matter
routine
record
events
occurrences
reflect
transactions
others
provide
internal
controls
conduct
business
commonly
entails
payment
tort
claims
incurred
negligence
employees
fact
company
makes
business
recording
employees
versions
accidents
put
statements
class
records
made
regular
course
business
within
meaning
act
law
office
land
follow
course
since
business
defined
act
includes
professions
real
perversion
rule
designed
facilitate
admission
records
experience
shown
quite
trustworthy
business
installing
regular
system
recording
preserving
version
accidents
potentially
liable
qualify
reports
act
result
act
cover
system
recording
events
occurrences
provided
though
little
nothing
management
operation
business
preparation
cases
trial
virtue
incidental
thereto
obtain
benefits
liberalized
version
early
shop
book
rule
probability
trustworthiness
records
routine
reflections
day
day
operations
business
forgotten
basis
rule
see
conner
seattle
ry
regularity
preparation
become
test
rather
character
records
earmarks
reliability
chesapeake
delaware
canal
acquired
source
origin
nature
compilation
completely
empty
words
act
historic
meaning
act
extended
apply
course
business
also
course
conduct
may
relationship
business
congress
must
extend
major
change
opens
wide
door
avoidance
left
implication
answer
say
congress
provided
act
various
circumstances
making
record
affect
weight
admissibility
provision
comes
play
case
requirements
act
met
short
manifest
case
reports
systematic
conduct
enterprise
railroad
business
unlike
payrolls
accounts
receivable
accounts
payable
bills
lading
like
reports
calculated
use
essentially
business
primary
utility
litigating
railroading
course
us
take
reports
act
congress
put
nothing
background
law
act
built
legislative
history
suggests
moment
business
preparing
cases
trial
included
connection
noted
act
may
stat
requires
officers
common
carriers
rail
make
oath
monthly
reports
railroad
accidents
interstate
commerce
commission
setting
forth
nature
causes
accidents
circumstances
connected
therewith
act
gives
commission
authority
investigate
make
reports
upon
accidents
provided
however
report
required
section
title
report
investigation
provided
section
title
part
thereof
shall
admitted
evidence
used
purpose
suit
action
damages
growing
matter
mentioned
said
report
investigation
similar
provision
stat
stat
bars
use
litigation
reports
concerning
accidents
resulting
failure
locomotive
boiler
appurtenances
legislation
reveals
explicit
congressional
policy
rule
reports
accidents
certainly
great
claim
objectivity
statement
sought
admitted
present
case
hardly
suppose
congress
modified
qualified
implication
long
standing
statutes
permitted
records
made
regular
course
business
introduced
assume
congress
expressly
prohibited
use
company
reports
accidents
impliedly
altered
policy
came
reports
employees
superiors
inference
wholly
way
several
hundred
years
history
behind
act
wigmore
supra
indicate
nature
reforms
designed
effect
course
liberally
interpreted
away
anachronistic
rules
gave
rise
need
aimed
course
business
must
find
meaning
inherent
nature
business
question
methods
systematically
employed
conduct
business
business
ii
one
respondent
witnesses
testified
given
signed
statement
one
respondent
lawyers
counsel
petitioners
asked
see
ruled
called
inspected
document
door
opened
respondent
offer
statement
evidence
case
admit
see
edison
electric
light
electric
lighting
counsel
petitioners
declined
inspect
statement
took
exception
petitioners
contend
ruling
reversible
error
light
rule
rule
rules
civil
procedure
following
section
reach
question
since
document
marked
identification
part
record
know
contents
therefore
impossible
stated
determine
whether
statement
contained
remarks
might
serve
impeach
witness
accordingly
say
ruling
prejudicial
even
assume
erroneous
mere
errors
substantial
rights
parties
sufficient
set
aside
jury
verdict
appellate
stat
seeks
judgment
set
aside
erroneous
ruling
carries
burden
showing
prejudice
resulted
burden
maintained
petitioners
iii
final
question
presented
case
relates
burden
proving
contributory
negligence
noted
two
causes
action
based
common
law
two
massachusetts
statute
without
distinguishing
charged
petitioners
burden
proving
contributory
negligence
petitioners
excepted
likewise
without
distinguishing
different
causes
action
without
making
distinction
tioners
requested
charge
burden
respondent
refused
exception
noted
respondent
contends
first
place
charge
correct
fact
rule
rules
civil
procedure
makes
contributory
negligence
affirmative
defense
agree
rule
covers
manner
pleading
question
burden
establishing
contributory
negligence
question
local
law
federal
courts
diversity
citizenship
cases
erie
tompkins
must
apply
cities
service
oil
dunlap
sampson
channell
see
central
vermont
ry
white
secondly
respondent
contends
courts
applied
rule
conflict
laws
obtains
new
york
far
causes
action
based
massachusetts
statute
concerned
disturb
holding
matter
new
york
conflict
laws
trial
bound
apply
klaxon
stentor
petitioners
burden
proving
contributory
negligence
ruling
based
fitzpatrick
international
ry
involved
action
brought
new
york
statute
province
ontario
statute
gave
plaintiff
negligence
action
though
guilty
contributory
negligence
recovery
defendant
negligent
damages
proportioned
degree
fault
imputable
defendant
new
york
appeals
held
new
york
courts
justified
applying
ontario
rule
growing
statute
burden
defendant
show
contributory
negligence
massachusetts
statute
two
present
causes
action
founded
makes
railroad
corporation
liable
neglect
giving
certain
signals
provides
tort
damages
injuries
death
collisions
crossings
may
recovered
neglect
injury
shown
addition
mere
want
ordinary
care
person
injured
time
collision
guilty
gross
wilful
negligence
acting
violation
law
gross
wilful
negligence
unlawful
act
contributed
injury
statute
like
ontario
statute
creates
rights
recognized
common
law
brooks
fitchburg
st
mass
duggan
bay
state
street
ry
mass
sullivan
hustis
mass
lewis
boston
maine
mass
actions
burden
proving
contributory
negligence
defendant
manley
boston
maine
mass
phelps
new
england
mass
mcdonald
new
york
mass
kenny
boston
maine
mass
see
moreover
measure
damages
death
sum
less
five
hundred
ten
thousand
dollars
assessed
reference
degree
culpability
railroad
referred
new
york
decision
involving
point
propriety
applying
rule
fitzpatrick
case
causes
action
based
massachusetts
statute
may
arguable
type
ruling
erie
tompkins
supra
readily
disturb
lower
federal
courts
applying
local
law
set
aside
ruling
except
plain
showing
error
question
raised
common
law
counts
serious
distinguish
conflict
laws
rule
case
like
fitzpatrick
case
rule
apparently
obtains
cases
foreign
cause
action
founded
statute
intimated
fitzpatrick
case
page
stated
cases
new
york
intermediate
appellate
courts
wright
palmison
clark
harnischfeger
sales
latter
situation
burden
proving
freedom
contributory
negligence
plaintiff
fitzpatrick
international
ry
supra
page
reverse
remand
case
may
examine
make
appropriate
application
new
york
law
common
law
counts
following
reason
noted
petitioners
exceptions
charge
given
requested
charge
differentiate
causes
action
based
massachusetts
statute
common
law
even
assume
charge
latter
erroneous
say
charge
incorrect
far
statutory
causes
action
concerned
likewise
must
assume
error
give
requested
charge
statutory
causes
action
even
though
accept
correct
charge
others
facts
general
exception
sufficient
fairness
trial
parties
objections
charge
must
sufficiently
specific
bring
focus
precise
nature
alleged
error
party
might
obtained
correct
charge
specifically
calling
attention
trial
error
part
charge
correct
may
general
exception
obtain
new
trial
see
lincoln
claflin
wall
beaver
taylor
mobile
ry
jurey
mcdermott
severe
norfolk
ry
earnest
pennsylvania
minds
long
standing
rule
federal
practice
applicable
type
case
others
rule
avoided
reason
requested
charge
said
partially
correct
sufficiently
discriminating
affirmed
footnotes
established
act
congress
writing
record
whether
form
entry
book
otherwise
made
memorandum
record
act
transaction
occurrence
event
shall
admissible
evidence
said
act
transaction
occurrence
event
shall
appear
made
regular
course
business
regular
course
business
make
memorandum
record
time
act
transaction
occurrence
event
within
reasonable
time
thereafter
circumstances
making
writing
record
including
lack
personal
knowledge
entrant
maker
may
shown
affect
weight
shall
affect
admissibility
term
shall
include
business
profession
occupation
calling
every
kind
problem
well
stated
judge
learned
hand
massachusetts
bonding
ins
norwich
pharmacal
routine
modern
affairs
mercantile
financial
industrial
conducted
extreme
division
labor
transactions
proved
first
hand
without
concurrence
persons
contribute
slight
part
part
dependent
memory
event
records
records
alone
adequate
repository
practice
accepted
accurate
upon
faith
routine
contents
unless
used
without
task
calling
stages
part
transactions
recorded
nobody
need
ever
pay
debt
creditor
large
enough
business
thus
report
senate
committee
judiciary
incorporates
recommendation
attorney
general
stated
support
legislation
old
rule
requires
every
book
entry
identified
person
making
exceedingly
difficult
impossible
case
institution
employing
large
bookkeeping
staff
particularly
entries
made
machine
recent
criminal
case
government
prevented
making
case
ruling
entries
books
bank
made
regular
course
business
admissible
evidence
unless
specific
bookkeeper
made
entry
identify
since
bank
employed
bookkeepers
entries
made
bookkeeping
machines
impossible
pp
clear
come
within
exceptions
declarations
deceased
witness
see
shepard
wigmore
supra
chs
xlixliv