zadvydas
davis
et
argued
february
decided
june
final
removal
order
entered
alien
ordered
removed
held
custody
removal
period
alien
removed
days
detention
statute
authorizes
detention
supervised
release
subject
administrative
review
kestutis
zadvydas
petitioner
resident
alien
born
apparently
lithuanian
parents
german
displaced
persons
camp
ordered
deported
based
criminal
record
germany
lithuania
refused
accept
citizen
countries
efforts
send
wife
native
country
also
failed
remained
custody
removal
period
expired
filed
habeas
action
district
granted
writ
reasoning
government
never
remove
confinement
permanent
violation
constitution
reversing
fifth
circuit
concluded
zadvydas
detention
violate
constitution
eventual
deportation
impossible
good
faith
efforts
remove
continued
detention
subject
administrative
review
kim
ho
respondent
resident
alien
born
cambodia
ordered
removed
based
aggravated
felony
conviction
remained
custody
removal
period
expired
filed
habeas
petition
ordering
release
district
held
constitution
forbids
detention
unless
realistic
chance
alien
removed
chance
existed
cambodia
repatriation
treaty
ninth
circuit
affirmed
concluding
detention
authorized
reasonable
time
beyond
period
given
lack
repatriation
agreement
time
expired
held
section
habeas
proceedings
available
forum
statutory
constitutional
challenges
detention
statutory
changes
immigration
law
left
habeas
untouched
basic
method
obtaining
review
continued
custody
deportation
order
becomes
final
none
statutory
provisions
limiting
judicial
review
removal
decisions
applies
pp
detention
statute
read
light
constitution
demands
implicitly
limits
alien
detention
period
reasonably
necessary
bring
alien
removal
permit
indefinite
detention
pp
statute
permitting
indefinite
detention
raise
serious
constitutional
questions
freedom
imprisonment
lies
heart
liberty
protected
due
process
clause
government
detention
violates
clause
unless
ordered
criminal
proceeding
adequate
procedural
safeguards
special
justification
outweighs
individual
liberty
interest
instant
proceedings
civil
assumed
nonpunitive
government
proffers
sufficiently
strong
justification
indefinite
civil
detention
statute
first
justification
preventing
flight
weak
nonexistent
removal
seems
remote
possibility
preventive
detention
based
second
justification
protecting
community
upheld
limited
specially
dangerous
individuals
subject
strong
procedural
protections
preventive
detention
potentially
indefinite
dangerousness
rationale
must
also
accompanied
special
circumstance
mental
illness
helps
create
danger
civil
confinement
potentially
permanent
flight
risk
justification
evaporates
special
circumstance
alien
removable
status
bears
relation
dangerousness
moreover
sole
procedural
protections
found
administrative
proceedings
alien
bears
burden
proving
dangerous
without
according
government
significant
later
judicial
review
constitution
may
well
preclude
granting
administrative
body
unreviewable
authority
make
determinations
implicating
fundamental
rights
pp
shaughnessy
ex
rel
mezei
alien
indefinitely
detained
attempted
reenter
country
support
government
argument
alien
status
justify
indefinite
detention
alien
enters
country
legal
circumstance
changes
due
process
clause
applies
persons
within
including
aliens
whether
presence
lawful
unlawful
temporary
permanent
cases
holding
congress
plenary
power
create
immigration
law
judicial
branch
must
defer
executive
legislative
branch
decisionmaking
area
help
government
power
subject
constitutional
limits
finally
aliens
liberty
interest
diminished
lack
legal
right
live
large
choice
issue
imprisonment
supervision
release
conditions
may
violated
liberty
interest
strong
enough
raise
serious
constitutional
problem
indefinite
detention
pp
despite
constitutional
problem
find
clear
congressional
intent
grant
attorney
general
power
indefinitely
detain
alien
ordered
removed
required
give
effect
finds
clear
indication
intent
statute
use
may
ambiguous
necessarily
suggest
unlimited
discretion
similar
related
statutes
requiring
detention
criminal
aliens
removal
proceedings
removal
period
show
congress
authorized
indefinite
detention
finally
nothing
statute
legislative
history
clearly
demonstrates
congressional
intent
authorize
indefinite
perhaps
permanent
detention
pp
application
reasonable
time
limitation
subject
review
basic
federal
habeas
statute
grants
federal
courts
authority
determine
whether
detention
pursuant
statutory
authority
answering
question
must
ask
whether
detention
exceeds
period
reasonably
necessary
secure
removal
measure
reasonableness
primarily
terms
statute
purpose
assuring
alien
presence
moment
removal
thus
removal
reasonably
foreseeable
hold
continued
detention
unreasonable
longer
authorized
foreseeable
consider
risk
alien
committing
crimes
factor
potentially
justifying
continued
confinement
without
abdicating
responsibility
review
detention
lawfulness
courts
take
appropriate
account
matters
executive
branch
greater
expertise
immigration
naturalization
service
administrative
needs
concerns
nation
need
speak
one
voice
immigration
order
limit
occasions
courts
need
make
difficult
judgments
called
recognition
necessary
executive
leeway
practically
necessary
recognize
presumptively
reasonable
period
detention
unlikely
congress
believed
reasonably
foreseeable
removals
accomplished
days
reason
believe
doubted
constitutionality
six
months
detention
thus
sake
uniform
administration
federal
courts
six
months
appropriate
period
period
alien
provides
good
reason
believe
significant
likelihood
removal
reasonably
foreseeable
future
government
must
furnish
evidence
sufficient
rebut
showing
pp
standard
fifth
circuit
applied
holding
zadvydas
continued
detention
lawful
seems
require
alien
seeking
release
show
absence
prospect
removal
matter
unlikely
unforeseeable
thus
demands
statute
bear
ninth
circuit
conclusion
released
may
rested
solely
upon
absence
repatriation
agreement
without
giving
due
weight
likelihood
successful
future
negotiations
vacated
remanded
breyer
delivered
opinion
stevens
souter
ginsburg
joined
scalia
filed
dissenting
opinion
thomas
joined
kennedy
filed
dissenting
opinion
rehnquist
joined
scalia
thomas
joined
part
kestutis
zadvydas
petitioner
christine
davis
immigration
naturalization
service
writ
certiorari
appeals
fifth
circuit
john
ashcroft
attorney
general
et
petitioners
kim
ho
writ
certiorari
appeals
ninth
circuit
june
justice
breyer
delivered
opinion
alien
found
unlawfully
present
final
order
removal
entered
government
ordinarily
secures
alien
removal
subsequent
statutory
removal
period
time
alien
normally
held
custody
special
statute
authorizes
detention
government
fails
remove
alien
days
says
alien
ordered
removed
inadmissible
removable
result
violations
status
requirements
entry
conditions
violations
criminal
law
reasons
security
foreign
policy
determined
attorney
general
risk
community
unlikely
comply
order
removal
may
detained
beyond
removal
period
released
shall
subject
certain
terms
supervision
supp
cases
must
decide
whether
statute
authorizes
attorney
general
detain
removable
alien
indefinitely
beyond
removal
period
period
reasonably
necessary
secure
alien
removal
deal
aliens
admitted
subsequently
ordered
removed
aliens
yet
gained
initial
admission
country
present
different
question
see
infra
based
conclusion
indefinite
detention
aliens
former
category
raise
serious
constitutional
concerns
construe
statute
contain
implicit
reasonable
time
limitation
application
subject
federal
review
detention
statute
one
related
set
statutes
regulations
govern
detention
removal
proceedings
removal
proceedings
progress
aliens
may
released
bond
paroled
stat
added
amended
stat
supp
entry
final
removal
order
removal
period
however
aliens
must
held
custody
subsequently
statute
provides
government
may
continue
detain
alien
still
remains
release
alien
supervision
related
immigration
naturalization
service
ins
regulations
add
ins
district
director
initially
review
alien
records
decide
whether
detention
release
supervision
warranted
removal
period
expires
cfr
decision
detain
ins
panel
review
matter
expiration
period
soon
thereafter
ii
panel
decide
basis
records
possible
personal
interview
still
detention
release
supervision
making
decision
panel
consider
example
alien
disciplinary
record
criminal
record
mental
health
reports
evidence
rehabilitation
history
flight
prior
immigration
history
favorable
factors
family
ties
authorize
release
panel
must
find
alien
likely
violent
pose
threat
community
flee
released
violate
conditions
release
alien
must
demonstrate
satisfaction
attorney
general
pose
danger
risk
flight
panel
decides
release
must
review
matter
within
year
review
earlier
conditions
change
iii
consider
two
separate
instances
detention
first
concerns
kestutis
zadvydas
resident
alien
born
apparently
lithuanian
parents
displaced
persons
camp
germany
eight
years
old
zadvydas
immigrated
parents
family
members
lived
ever
since
zadvydas
long
criminal
record
involving
drug
crimes
attempted
robbery
attempted
burglary
theft
history
flight
criminal
deportation
proceedings
recently
convicted
possessing
intent
distribute
cocaine
sentenced
years
imprisonment
released
parole
two
years
taken
ins
custody
ordered
deported
germany
see
supp
delineating
crimes
make
alien
deportable
germany
told
ins
accept
zadvydas
german
citizen
shortly
thereafter
lithuania
refused
accept
zadvydas
neither
lithuanian
citizen
permanent
resident
ins
asked
dominican
republic
zadvydas
wife
country
accept
effort
proved
unsuccessful
lithuania
rejected
inadequately
documented
zadvydas
effort
obtain
lithuanian
citizenship
based
parents
citizenship
zadvydas
reapplication
apparently
still
pending
ins
kept
zadvydas
custody
expiration
removal
period
september
zadvydas
filed
petition
writ
habeas
corpus
challenging
continued
detention
october
federal
district
granted
writ
ordered
released
supervision
zadvydas
caplinger
supp
ed
view
government
never
succeed
efforts
remove
zadvydas
leading
permanent
confinement
contrary
constitution
fifth
circuit
reversed
decision
zadvydas
underdown
concluded
zadvydas
detention
violate
constitution
eventual
deportation
impossible
good
faith
efforts
remove
continued
detention
subject
periodic
administrative
review
fifth
circuit
stayed
mandate
pending
potential
review
second
case
kim
ho
born
cambodia
two
family
fled
taking
refugee
camps
thailand
philippines
eventually
lived
resident
alien
since
age
seven
age
involved
shooting
convicted
manslaughter
sentenced
months
imprisonment
served
two
years
released
ins
custody
light
conviction
aggravated
felony
ordered
removed
see
defining
certain
violent
crimes
aggravated
felonies
iii
supp
iv
aliens
convicted
aggravated
felonies
deportable
removal
period
expired
early
ins
continued
keep
custody
light
former
gang
membership
nature
crime
planned
participation
prison
hunger
strike
unable
conclude
remain
nonviolent
violate
conditions
release
app
pet
cert
filed
petition
writ
habeas
corpus
panel
five
judges
federal
district
western
district
washington
considering
similar
cases
together
issued
joint
order
holding
constitution
forbids
detention
unless
realistic
chance
alien
deported
thereby
permitting
classification
detention
aid
deportation
binh
phan
reno
supp
district
held
evidentiary
hearing
decided
realistic
chance
cambodia
repatriation
treaty
accept
ordered
released
app
pet
cert
ninth
circuit
affirmed
release
kim
ho
reno
concluded
based
part
constitutional
concerns
statute
authorize
detention
reasonable
time
beyond
period
authorized
removal
given
lack
repatriation
agreement
cambodia
time
expired
upon
passage
days
zadvydas
asked
us
review
decision
fifth
circuit
authorizing
continued
detention
government
asked
us
review
decision
ninth
circuit
forbidding
continued
detention
granted
writs
cases
agreeing
consider
statutory
related
constitutional
questions
see
also
duy
dac
ho
greene
upholding
attorney
general
statutory
constitutional
authority
detain
alien
indefinitely
consolidated
two
cases
argument
decide
together
ii
note
outset
primary
federal
habeas
corpus
statute
confers
jurisdiction
upon
federal
courts
hear
cases
see
authorizing
person
claim
federal
held
custody
violation
constitution
laws
federal
courts
considered
challenges
lawfulness
detention
including
challenges
validity
deportation
order
habeas
proceedings
see
heikkila
barber
beginning
alternative
method
review
deportation
orders
namely
actions
brought
federal
district
administrative
procedure
act
apa
became
available
see
shaughnessy
pedreiro
congress
replaced
district
apa
review
initial
deportation
order
review
courts
appeals
see
act
stat
formerly
codified
repealed
act
specified
federal
habeas
courts
also
available
hear
statutory
constitutional
challenges
deportation
exclusion
orders
see
repealed
statutory
changes
left
habeas
untouched
basic
method
obtaining
review
continued
custody
deportation
order
become
final
see
cheng
fan
kwok
ins
holding
applied
challenges
determinations
made
deportation
proceedings
motions
reopen
proceedings
recently
congress
enacted
several
statutory
provisions
limit
circumstances
judicial
review
deportation
decisions
available
none
applies
one
provision
supp
simply
forbids
courts
construe
section
create
procedural
right
benefit
legally
enforceable
deprive
alien
right
rely
challenge
detention
without
statutory
authority
another
provision
ii
supp
says
shall
jurisdiction
review
decisions
specified
discretion
attorney
general
aliens
however
seek
review
attorney
general
exercise
discretion
rather
challenge
extent
attorney
general
authority
detention
statute
extent
authority
matter
discretion
see
also
applicable
certain
decisions
period
preceding
entry
final
removal
order
applicable
assertion
causes
claims
issue
applicable
judicial
review
final
order
removal
applicable
decisions
commence
proceedings
adjudicate
cases
execute
removal
orders
conclude
habeas
corpus
proceedings
remain
available
forum
statutory
constitutional
challenges
detention
turn
merits
aliens
claims
iii
detention
statute
applies
certain
categories
aliens
ordered
removed
namely
inadmissible
aliens
criminal
aliens
aliens
violated
nonimmigrant
status
conditions
aliens
removable
certain
national
security
foreign
relations
reasons
well
alien
determined
attorney
general
risk
community
unlikely
comply
order
removal
supp
see
also
cfr
says
alien
falls
one
categories
may
detained
beyond
removal
period
released
shall
subject
certain
terms
supervision
supp
government
argues
statute
means
literally
says
sets
limit
length
time
beyond
removal
period
alien
falls
within
one
section
categories
may
detained
brief
petitioners
hence
whether
continue
detain
alien
circumstances
long
attorney
general
courts
ibid
cardinal
principle
statutory
interpretation
however
act
congress
raises
serious
doubt
constitutionality
first
ascertain
whether
construction
statute
fairly
possible
question
may
avoided
crowell
benson
see
also
video
jin
fuey
moy
cf
construction
statute
avoids
invalidation
best
reflects
congressional
read
significant
limitations
immigration
statutes
order
avoid
constitutional
invalidation
see
witkovich
construing
grant
authority
attorney
general
ask
aliens
whatever
questions
deem
fit
proper
limited
questions
reasonably
calculated
keep
attorney
general
advised
regarding
continued
availability
departure
aliens
whose
deportation
overdue
similar
reasons
read
implicit
limitation
statute
us
view
statute
read
light
constitution
demands
limits
alien
detention
period
reasonably
necessary
bring
alien
removal
permit
indefinite
detention
statute
permitting
indefinite
detention
alien
raise
serious
constitutional
problem
fifth
amendment
due
process
clause
forbids
government
depriv
person
liberty
without
due
process
law
freedom
imprisonment
government
custody
detention
forms
physical
restraint
lies
heart
liberty
clause
protects
see
foucha
louisiana
said
government
detention
violates
clause
unless
detention
ordered
criminal
proceeding
adequate
procedural
protections
see
salerno
certain
special
narrow
circumstances
foucha
supra
special
justification
mental
illness
outweighs
individual
constitutionally
protected
interest
avoiding
physical
restraint
kansas
hendricks
proceedings
issue
civil
criminal
assume
nonpunitive
purpose
effect
sufficiently
strong
special
justification
indefinite
civil
detention
least
administered
statute
statute
says
government
two
regulatory
goals
ensuring
appearance
aliens
future
immigration
proceedings
reventing
danger
community
brief
respondents
definition
first
justification
preventing
flight
weak
nonexistent
removal
seems
remote
possibility
best
said
jackson
indiana
detention
goal
longer
practically
attainable
detention
longer
bear
reasonable
relation
purpose
individual
committed
second
justification
protecting
community
necessarily
diminish
force
time
upheld
preventive
detention
based
dangerousness
limited
specially
dangerous
individuals
subject
strong
procedural
protections
compare
hendricks
supra
upholding
scheme
imposes
detention
upon
small
segment
particularly
dangerous
individuals
provides
strict
procedural
safeguards
salerno
supra
upholding
pretrial
detention
stressing
stringent
time
limitations
fact
detention
reserved
serious
crimes
requirement
proof
dangerousness
clear
convincing
evidence
presence
judicial
safeguards
foucha
supra
striking
detention
system
placed
burden
detainee
prove
nondangerousness
cases
preventive
detention
potentially
indefinite
duration
also
demanded
dangerousness
rationale
accompanied
special
circumstance
mental
illness
helps
create
danger
see
hendricks
supra
civil
confinement
issue
limited
potentially
permanent
cf
salerno
supra
noting
maximum
length
pretrial
detention
limited
stringent
requirements
carlson
landon
upholding
temporary
detention
alien
deportation
proceeding
noting
problem
unusual
delay
present
provision
authorizing
detention
apply
narrowly
small
segment
particularly
dangerous
individuals
hendricks
supra
say
suspected
terrorists
broadly
aliens
ordered
removed
many
various
reasons
including
tourist
visa
violations
see
supp
referencing
cf
hendricks
individuals
past
sexually
violent
behavior
present
mental
condition
creates
likelihood
conduct
future
may
detained
flight
risk
justification
evaporates
special
circumstance
present
alien
removable
status
bears
relation
detainee
dangerousness
cf
foucha
supra
moreover
sole
procedural
protections
available
alien
found
administrative
proceedings
alien
bears
burden
proving
dangerous
without
government
view
significant
later
judicial
review
compare
cfr
imposing
burden
proving
nondangerousness
upon
alien
foucha
supra
striking
detention
reason
suggested
however
constitution
may
well
preclude
granting
administrative
body
unreviewable
authority
make
determinations
implicating
fundamental
rights
superintendent
mass
correctional
institution
walpole
hill
see
also
crowell
concurring
judgment
phillips
commissioner
brandeis
serious
constitutional
problem
arising
statute
circumstances
permits
indefinite
perhaps
permanent
deprivation
human
liberty
without
protection
obvious
government
argues
constitutional
perspective
alien
status
justify
indefinite
detention
points
shaughnessy
ex
rel
mezei
support
case
involved
lawfully
admitted
alien
left
returned
trip
abroad
refused
admission
left
ellis
island
indefinitely
detained
government
find
another
country
accept
held
mezei
detention
violate
constitution
although
mezei
like
present
cases
involves
indefinite
detention
differs
present
cases
critical
respect
emphasized
alien
extended
departure
required
seek
entry
country
presence
ellis
island
count
entry
hence
treated
constitutional
purposes
stopped
border
made
difference
distinction
alien
effected
entry
one
never
entered
runs
throughout
immigration
law
see
kaplan
tod
despite
nine
years
presence
excluded
alien
still
theory
law
boundary
line
gained
foothold
leng
may
barber
alien
paroled
pending
admissibility
effected
entry
well
established
certain
constitutional
protections
available
persons
inside
unavailable
aliens
outside
geographic
borders
see
fifth
amendment
protections
extend
aliens
outside
territorial
boundaries
johnson
eisentrager
alien
enters
country
legal
circumstance
changes
due
process
clause
applies
persons
within
including
aliens
whether
presence
lawful
unlawful
temporary
permanent
see
plyler
doe
mathews
diaz
kwong
hai
chew
colding
yick
wo
hopkins
cf
mezei
supra
liens
passed
gates
even
illegally
may
expelled
proceedings
conforming
traditional
standards
fairness
encompassed
due
process
law
indeed
held
due
process
clause
protects
alien
subject
final
order
deportation
see
wong
wing
though
nature
protection
may
vary
depending
upon
status
circumstance
see
landon
plasencia
johnson
supra
wong
wing
supra
held
unconstitutional
statute
imposed
year
hard
labor
upon
aliens
subject
final
deportation
order
case
concerned
substantive
protections
aliens
ordered
removed
procedural
protections
aliens
whose
removability
determined
compare
post
scalia
dissenting
held
punitive
measures
imposed
upon
aliens
ordered
removed
persons
within
territory
entitled
protection
constitution
citing
yick
wo
supra
holding
equal
protection
guarantee
applies
chinese
aliens
see
also
witkovich
construing
statute
applied
aliens
ordered
deported
order
avoid
substantive
constitutional
problems
contrary
justice
scalia
characterization
see
post
mezei
rejection
mezei
challenge
procedures
deemed
excludable
rejection
challenge
continued
detention
rested
upon
basic
territorial
distinction
see
mezei
supra
holding
mezei
presence
ellis
island
considered
landing
affec
legal
constitutional
status
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
light
critical
distinction
mezei
present
cases
mezei
offer
government
significant
support
need
consider
aliens
claim
subsequent
developments
undermined
mezei
legal
authority
see
brief
petitioner
brief
respondent
pp
brief
lawyers
committee
human
rights
amicus
curiae
pp
aware
authority
support
justice
kennedy
limitation
due
process
protection
removable
aliens
freedom
detention
arbitrary
capricious
see
post
dissenting
opinion
government
also
looks
support
cases
holding
congress
plenary
power
create
immigration
law
judicial
branch
must
defer
executive
legislative
branch
decisionmaking
area
brief
respondents
citing
harisiades
shaughnessy
power
subject
important
constitutional
limitations
see
ins
chadha
congress
must
choose
constitutionally
permissible
means
implementing
power
chinese
exclusion
case
congressional
authority
limited
constitution
considerations
public
policy
justice
control
less
conduct
civilized
nations
cases
focus
upon
limitations
nowhere
deny
right
congress
remove
aliens
subject
supervision
conditions
released
detention
incarcerate
appropriate
violations
conditions
see
supp
granting
authority
attorney
general
prescribe
regulations
governing
supervision
aliens
removed
within
days
imposing
penalties
failure
comply
release
conditions
question
us
one
confer
ring
admitted
right
remain
national
sufferance
removed
post
scalia
dissenting
quoting
mezei
jackson
dissenting
rather
issue
address
whether
aliens
government
finds
unable
remove
condemned
indefinite
term
imprisonment
within
cases
us
require
us
consider
political
branches
authority
control
entry
hence
leave
unprotected
spot
nation
armor
kwong
hai
chew
supra
neither
consider
terrorism
special
circumstances
special
arguments
might
made
forms
preventive
detention
heightened
deference
judgments
political
branches
respect
matters
national
security
sole
foreign
policy
consideration
government
mentions
concern
lest
courts
interfere
sensitive
repatriation
negotiations
brief
respondents
neither
government
dissents
explain
habeas
efforts
determine
likelihood
repatriation
handled
appropriate
sensitivity
make
significant
difference
respect
see
infra
finally
government
argues
whatever
liberty
interest
aliens
possess
greatly
diminished
lack
legal
right
liv
large
country
brief
respondents
see
also
post
scalia
dissenting
characterizing
right
issue
right
release
country
choice
however
imprisonment
alien
living
large
brief
respondents
imprisonment
supervision
release
conditions
may
violated
see
supra
citing
supp
cfr
establishing
conditions
release
removal
period
reasons
set
forth
believe
alien
liberty
interest
least
strong
enough
raise
serious
question
whether
irrespective
procedures
used
cf
post
kennedy
dissenting
constitution
permits
detention
indefinite
potentially
permanent
despite
constitutional
problem
congress
made
intent
statute
clear
must
give
effect
intent
miller
french
quoting
sinclair
refining
atkinson
find
however
clear
indication
congressional
intent
grant
attorney
general
power
hold
indefinitely
confinement
alien
ordered
removed
whether
protecting
community
dangerous
aliens
primary
believe
secondary
statutory
purpose
cf
post
kennedy
dissenting
provision
part
statute
basic
purpose
effectuating
alien
removal
assume
gress
saw
alien
dangerousness
unrelated
purpose
government
points
statute
word
may
may
suggests
discretion
necessarily
suggest
unlimited
discretion
respect
word
may
ambiguous
indeed
congress
meant
authorize
detention
unremovable
aliens
certainly
spoken
clearer
terms
compare
supp
country
willing
receive
terrorist
alien
ordered
removed
attorney
general
may
notwithstanding
provision
law
retain
alien
custody
must
review
detention
determination
every
six
months
government
points
similar
related
statutes
require
detention
criminal
aliens
removal
proceedings
removal
period
argues
show
mandatory
detention
rule
discretionary
release
narrow
exception
see
brief
petitioners
citing
statute
us
applies
terrorists
criminals
also
ordinary
visa
violators
see
supra
importantly
detention
unlike
detention
pending
determination
removability
subsequent
removal
period
obvious
termination
point
government
also
points
statute
history
history
catalogs
series
changes
initial
period
lower
courts
interpreted
statutory
silence
immigration
act
ch
stat
mean
detention
must
end
within
reasonable
time
spector
landon
collecting
cases
ex
rel
doukas
wiley
ex
rel
ross
wallis
period
early
late
statutes
permitted
require
detention
six
months
immigration
nationality
act
stat
ed
witkovich
recent
statutes
times
mandated
times
permitted
detention
aliens
falling
certain
categories
aggravated
felons
abuse
act
stat
mandating
detention
immigration
act
stat
permitting
release
certain
circumstances
miscellaneous
technical
immigration
naturalization
amendments
stat
early
congress
explicitly
expanded
group
aliens
subject
mandatory
detention
eliminating
provisions
permitted
release
criminal
aliens
one
time
lawfully
admitted
antiterrorism
effective
death
penalty
act
stat
later
year
congress
enacted
present
law
liberalizes
law
shortening
removal
period
six
months
days
mandates
detention
certain
criminal
aliens
removal
proceedings
subsequent
removal
period
adds
provision
issue
illegal
immigration
reform
immigrant
responsibility
act
div
stat
supp
found
nothing
history
statutes
clearly
demonstrates
congressional
intent
authorize
indefinite
perhaps
permanent
detention
consequently
interpreting
statute
avoid
serious
constitutional
threat
conclude
removal
longer
reasonably
foreseeable
continued
detention
longer
authorized
statute
see
coke
institutes
cessante
ratione
legis
cessat
ipse
lex
rationale
legal
rule
longer
applicable
rule
longer
applies
iv
government
seems
argue
even
interpretation
statute
federal
habeas
accept
government
view
whether
implicit
statutory
limitation
satisfied
particular
case
conducting
little
independent
review
matter
view
whether
set
particular
circumstances
amounts
detention
within
beyond
period
reasonably
necessary
secure
removal
determinative
whether
detention
pursuant
statutory
authority
basic
federal
habeas
corpus
statute
grants
federal
courts
authority
answer
question
see
granting
courts
authority
determine
whether
detention
violation
laws
courts
carry
described
historic
purpose
writ
namely
relieve
detention
executive
authorities
without
judicial
trial
brown
allen
jackson
concurring
result
answering
basic
question
habeas
must
ask
whether
detention
question
exceeds
period
reasonably
necessary
secure
removal
measure
reasonableness
primarily
terms
statute
basic
purpose
namely
assuring
alien
presence
moment
removal
thus
removal
reasonably
foreseeable
hold
continued
detention
unreasonable
longer
authorized
statute
case
course
alien
release
may
conditioned
various
forms
supervised
release
appropriate
circumstances
alien
may
doubt
returned
custody
upon
violation
conditions
see
supra
citing
supp
cfr
removal
reasonably
foreseeable
habeas
consider
risk
alien
committing
crimes
factor
potentially
justifying
confinement
within
reasonable
removal
period
see
supra
recognize
government
points
review
must
take
appropriate
account
greater
expertise
executive
branch
serious
administrative
needs
concerns
inherent
necessarily
extensive
ins
efforts
enforce
complex
statute
nation
need
speak
one
voice
immigration
matters
brief
respondents
believe
courts
take
appropriate
account
matters
without
abdicating
legal
responsibility
review
lawfulness
alien
continued
detention
ordinary
principles
judicial
review
area
recognize
primary
executive
branch
responsibility
counsel
judges
give
expert
agencies
decisionmaking
leeway
matters
invoke
expertise
see
pension
benefit
guaranty
corporation
ltv
recognize
executive
branch
primacy
foreign
policy
matters
see
container
america
franchise
tax
consequently
require
courts
listen
care
government
foreign
policy
judgments
including
example
status
repatriation
negotiations
issue
grant
government
appropriate
leeway
judgments
rest
upon
foreign
policy
expertise
realize
recognizing
necessary
executive
leeway
often
call
difficult
judgments
order
limit
occasions
courts
need
make
think
practically
necessary
recognize
presumptively
reasonable
period
detention
adopted
similar
presumptions
contexts
guide
lower
determinations
see
cheff
schnackenberg
plurality
opinion
adopting
rule
based
definition
petty
offense
code
right
jury
trial
extends
cases
sentence
six
months
greater
imposed
county
riverside
mclaughlin
adopting
presumption
based
lower
estimate
time
needed
process
arrestee
delay
probable
cause
hearing
arrest
reasonable
hence
constitutionally
permissible
argument
made
confining
presumption
days
doubt
congress
shortened
removal
period
days
believed
reasonably
foreseeable
removals
accomplished
time
reason
believe
however
congress
previously
doubted
constitutionality
detention
six
months
see
juris
statement
witkovich
pp
consequently
sake
uniform
administration
federal
courts
recognize
period
period
alien
provides
good
reason
believe
significant
likelihood
removal
reasonably
foreseeable
future
government
must
respond
evidence
sufficient
rebut
showing
detention
remain
reasonable
period
prior
confinement
grows
counts
reasonably
foreseeable
future
conversely
shrink
presumption
course
mean
every
alien
removed
must
released
six
months
contrary
alien
may
held
confinement
determined
significant
likelihood
removal
reasonably
foreseeable
future
fifth
circuit
held
zadvydas
continued
detention
lawful
long
good
faith
efforts
effectuate
deportation
continue
zadvydas
failed
show
deportation
prove
impossible
standard
seem
require
alien
seeking
release
show
absence
prospect
removal
matter
unlikely
unforeseeable
demands
reading
statute
bear
ninth
circuit
held
government
required
release
detention
reasonable
likelihood
removal
foreseeable
future
conclusion
may
rested
solely
upon
absence
extant
pending
repatriation
agreement
without
giving
due
weight
likelihood
successful
future
negotiations
see
consequently
vacate
decisions
remand
cases
proceedings
consistent
opinion
ordered
kestutis
zadvydas
petitioner
christine
davis
immigration
naturalization
service
writ
certiorari
appeals
fifth
circuit
john
ashcroft
attorney
general
et
petitioners
kim
ho
writ
certiorari
appeals
ninth
circuit
june
justice
scalia
justice
thomas
joins
dissenting
join
part
justice
kennedy
dissent
establishes
attorney
general
clear
statutory
authority
detain
criminal
aliens
specified
time
limit
write
separately
believe
justice
kennedy
suggests
part
ii
opinion
may
situations
courts
order
release
believe
zadvydas
davis
ashcroft
careful
description
substantive
right
claimed
reno
flores
suffices
categorically
refute
existence
criminal
alien
final
order
removal
allegedly
accepted
country
reasonably
foreseeable
future
claims
constitutional
right
supervised
release
claim
repackaged
freedom
physical
restraint
freedom
indefinite
detention
ante
bottom
claimed
right
release
country
individual
concededly
legal
right
constitutional
right
like
criminal
alien
final
order
removal
inadmissible
alien
border
right
chinese
exclusion
case
shaughnessy
ex
rel
mezei
upheld
potentially
indefinite
detention
inadmissible
alien
government
unable
return
anywhere
else
said
think
respondent
continued
exclusion
deprives
statutory
constitutional
right
four
members
thought
mezei
deserved
greater
procedural
protections
attorney
general
refused
divulge
information
mezei
detained
justice
asserted
mezei
substantive
constitutional
right
release
country
justice
jackson
dissent
joined
justice
frankfurter
affirmatively
asserted
opposite
contradiction
due
process
invest
alien
right
enter
confer
admitted
right
remain
national
nothing
constitution
requires
admission
sufferance
aliens
hostile
scheme
government
emphasis
added
insofar
claimed
legal
right
release
country
concerned
alien
final
order
removal
stands
equal
footing
inadmissible
alien
threshold
entry
right
expressly
declines
apply
overrule
mezei
ante
attempts
distinguish
rather
say
obscure
legal
fog
first
claims
distinction
alien
effected
entry
one
never
entered
runs
throughout
immigration
law
ante
true
enough
distinction
makes
perfect
sense
regard
question
procedures
necessary
prevent
entry
opposed
procedures
necessary
eject
person
already
see
landon
plasencia
cases
frequently
suggested
continuously
present
resident
alien
entitled
fair
hearing
threatened
deportation
emphasis
added
citation
wong
wing
proposition
held
due
process
clause
protects
alien
subject
final
order
deportation
ante
arguably
relevant
case
least
involved
aliens
final
order
deportation
held
subjected
punishment
hard
labor
without
judicial
trial
sure
tortured
well
neither
prohibition
anything
right
released
wong
wing
show
rights
detained
aliens
subject
final
order
deportation
different
rights
aliens
arrested
detained
border
unless
believes
detained
alien
mezei
set
hard
labor
mezei
thus
stands
unexplained
undistinguished
opinion
offered
justification
alien
valid
final
order
removal
totally
extinguished
whatever
right
presence
country
possessed
greater
due
process
right
released
country
alien
border
seeking
entry
congress
undoubtedly
thought
groups
aliens
inadmissible
aliens
threshold
criminal
aliens
final
order
removal
constitutionally
detained
terms
since
provided
authority
detain
groups
statutory
provision
see
believe
mezei
controls
cases
like
also
see
reason
reconsider
mezei
find
constitutional
impediment
discretion
congress
gave
attorney
general
justice
kennedy
dissent
explains
clarity
detention
provision
see
obstacle
following
statute
plain
meaning
kestutis
zadvydas
petitioner
christine
davis
immigration
naturalization
service
writ
certiorari
appeals
fifth
circuit
john
ashcroft
attorney
general
et
petitioners
kim
ho
writ
certiorari
appeals
ninth
circuit
june
justice
kennedy
chief
justice
joins
justice
scalia
justice
thomas
join
part
dissenting
says
duty
avoid
constitutional
question
deems
duty
performed
interpreting
statute
obvious
disregard
congressional
intent
curing
resulting
gap
writing
statutory
amendment
committing
grave
constitutional
error
arrogating
judicial
branch
power
summon
high
officers
executive
assess
progress
conducting
nation
sensitive
negotiations
foreign
powers
likely
releasing
general
population
least
hundreds
removable
inadmissible
aliens
found
fair
procedures
flight
risks
dangers
community
far
avoiding
constitutional
question
ruling
causes
systemic
dislocation
balance
powers
thus
raising
serious
constitutional
concerns
cases
hand
view
proper
authority
supposed
respect
seeks
reaching
constitutional
question
outweighed
intrusive
erroneous
exercise
powers
guise
judicial
restraint
intrude
upon
branches
constitutional
question
statute
presents
must
acknowledged
may
significant
one
later
case
drive
us
incorrect
interpretation
statute
reached
wrong
result
wrong
reason
respectful
dissent
required
immigration
nationality
act
ina
et
seq
ed
supp
straightforward
enough
provides
alien
ordered
removed
inadmissible
section
title
removable
section
title
determined
attorney
general
risk
community
unlikely
comply
order
removal
may
detained
beyond
removal
period
released
shall
subject
terms
supervision
paragraph
supp
statute
congress
confers
upon
attorney
general
discretion
detain
alien
ordered
removed
gives
express
authorization
detain
beyond
removal
period
ibid
class
removed
aliens
detainable
section
includes
aliens
inadmissible
aliens
subject
final
orders
removal
provided
risk
community
likely
flee
issue
determined
whether
authorization
detain
beyond
removal
period
subject
implied
nontextual
limitation
detention
longer
reasonably
necessary
effect
removal
another
country
majority
invokes
canon
constitutional
doubt
read
implied
term
statute
one
accept
premise
substantial
constitutional
question
presented
prospect
lengthy
even
unending
detention
instances
statutory
construction
adopts
rejected
event
interpretation
basis
language
structure
ina
fact
contradicts
defeats
purpose
set
forth
express
terms
statutory
text
submitted
misunderstands
principle
constitutional
avoidance
seeks
invoke
majority
gives
brief
bow
rule
courts
must
respect
intention
congress
ante
waltzes
away
analysis
language
structure
purpose
statute
analysis
consistent
precedents
explaining
limits
constitutional
doubt
rule
rule
allows
courts
choose
among
constructions
fairly
possible
crowell
benson
press
statutory
construction
point
disingenuous
evasion
even
avoid
constitutional
question
salinas
quoting
seminole
tribe
florida
find
two
interpretations
equal
plausibility
choose
construction
avoids
confronting
constitutional
question
majority
reading
statutory
authorization
detai
beyond
removal
period
however
plausible
interpretation
defeats
stated
congressional
purpose
suffice
invoke
constitutional
doubt
rule
plainly
contrary
intent
congress
video
majority
announces
reject
government
argument
statute
means
literally
says
ante
declines
offer
acceptable
textual
interpretation
majority
demonstrate
ambiguity
delegation
detention
power
attorney
general
simply
amends
statute
impose
time
limit
tied
progress
negotiations
effect
aliens
removal
statute
construed
requirement
majority
reads
law
simply
bears
relation
text
fact
defeats
statutory
purpose
design
provisions
link
requirement
reasonable
time
period
removal
process
see
providing
alien
arrives
port
entry
shall
removed
immediately
vessel
aircraft
unless
impracticable
within
reasonable
time
emphasis
added
ii
ii
requiring
owner
vessel
aircraft
bringing
alien
pay
costs
detaining
maintaining
alien
period
time
reasonably
necessary
owner
arrange
repatriation
emphasis
added
congress
chose
impose
limitation
sections
evidence
intent
measure
detention
period
standards
congress
made
express
provisions
contingency
repatriation
might
difficult
prolonged
portions
statute
presumed
omission
contingency
detention
section
purposeful
indeed
reasonable
time
limits
provisions
mentioned
simply
excuse
duty
early
removal
mandate
release
alien
within
one
categories
say
ship
stowaway
subject
well
detention
beyond
removal
period
statute
read
written
majority
view
however
appears
alien
must
released
six
months
even
presenting
real
danger
community
period
invented
even
modified
sliding
standard
reasonableness
certain
repatriation
negotiations
see
ante
makes
statutory
purpose
protect
community
ineffective
risk
community
exists
whether
repatriation
negotiations
end
sight
fact
negotiations
end
risk
may
greater
authority
detain
beyond
removal
period
protect
community
negotiate
aliens
return
risk
community
survives
repatriation
negotiations
limited
still
significant
extent
concern
flight
fact
international
diplomacy
governments
policies
change
repatriation
efforts
revived
attorney
general
interest
ensuring
alien
report
removal
process
begin
congress
moreover
well
aware
difficulties
confronting
aliens
removable
repatriated
made
special
provisions
allowing
employed
privilege
denied
deportable
aliens
see
providing
alien
removed
due
refusal
countries
designated
alien
section
receive
alien
still
remains
eligible
employment
congress
decision
ameliorate
condition
aliens
subject
final
order
removal
repatriated
need
detained
illustrates
balance
statutory
design
yet
renders
side
balance
meaningless
risk
community
posed
removable
alien
function
variety
circumstances
circumstances
diminish
alien
deported
within
foreseeable
time
circumstances
include
seriousness
alien
past
offenses
efforts
rehabilitation
indication
alien
given
real
prospect
detention
alien
conform
conduct
purpose
periodic
review
detention
status
provided
regulations
see
cfr
amendment
statute
reads
provision
congressional
decision
dangerousness
alone
sufficient
basis
detention
see
ante
citing
coke
institutes
reads
well
meaningful
structure
supervised
release
majority
correct
observe
witkovich
read
significant
limitations
statute
ante
permit
us
avoid
proper
reading
enactment
us
witkovich
construed
former
required
alien
final
order
deportation
give
information
oath
attorney
general
may
deem
fit
proper
held
although
plain
language
appears
confer
upon
attorney
general
unbounded
authority
require
whatever
information
deems
desirable
aliens
whose
deportation
effected
within
six
months
constitutional
doubt
interpretation
raise
meant
language
construed
limited
provision
information
reasonably
calculated
keep
attorney
general
advised
regarding
continued
availability
departure
aliens
whose
deportation
overdue
witkovich
interpretation
text
aid
statutory
purpose
instant
cases
interpretation
nullifies
statutory
purpose
statute
terms
permits
attorney
general
consider
factors
makes
irrelevant
majority
unanchored
interpretation
ignores
another
indication
attorney
general
detention
discretion
limited
truncated
period
section
permits
continued
detention
removable
aliens
also
inadmissible
aliens
instance
stopped
border
entry
congress
provides
detention
categories
within
statutory
grant
authority
accepting
majority
interpretation
two
possibilities
neither
sustainable
one
hand
may
majority
rule
applies
categories
aliens
case
asked
assume
congress
intended
restrict
discretion
confer
upon
attorney
general
inadmissible
aliens
must
allowed
community
within
six
months
hand
majority
logic
might
inadmissible
removable
aliens
treated
differently
yet
plausible
construction
imply
time
limit
one
class
another
text
admit
possibility
result
difficult
see
liens
yet
gained
initial
admission
country
present
different
question
ante
congress
power
detain
aliens
connection
removal
exclusion
said
part
legislature
considerable
authority
immigration
matters
see
wong
wing
proceedings
exclude
expel
vain
accused
held
custody
pending
inquiry
true
character
arrangements
made
deportation
reasonable
assume
proper
interpretation
ina
congress
provided
detention
beyond
removal
period
exercised
considerable
power
immigration
delegated
attorney
general
discretion
detain
inadmissible
removable
aliens
long
determined
either
flight
risk
danger
nation
majority
interpretation
moreover
defeats
repatriation
goal
professes
interest
rushes
substitute
judicial
judgment
executive
discretion
authority
government
represents
us
judicial
orders
requiring
release
removable
aliens
even
temporary
basis
potential
undermine
obvious
necessity
nation
speak
one
voice
immigration
foreign
affairs
matters
brief
respondents
result
rule
refusing
accept
repatriation
nationals
countries
effect
release
individuals
back
american
community
ibid
nationals
large
nation
origin
may
ignore
disclaim
responsibility
accept
return
ibid
interference
sensitive
foreign
relations
becomes
even
acute
hostility
tension
characterizes
relationship
countries
use
fact
judicially
mandated
release
strategic
advantage
refusing
return
nationals
force
dangerous
aliens
upon
us
one
alarming
aspects
new
venture
foreign
affairs
management
suggestion
district
expand
contract
reasonable
period
detention
based
assessment
course
negotiations
foreign
powers
says
allow
executive
perform
duties
six
months
foreign
relations
go
judicially
supervised
receivership
cases
relies
upon
support
imposition
presumptions
inapposite
rule
announced
cheff
schnackenberg
sentences
exceeding
six
months
criminal
contempt
may
imposed
federal
courts
absent
jury
trial
based
definition
petty
offense
still
operable
code
proper
peculiar
power
federal
courts
revise
sentences
contempt
cases
majority
point
similar
statutory
judicial
source
authority
create
rule
cases
cites
observation
brief
filed
government
witkovich
pp
see
ante
relying
turn
doubts
expressed
senate
report
concerning
detention
longer
six
months
act
standards
different
far
less
precise
applicable
county
riverside
mclaughlin
reasonableness
presumption
delays
less
hours
arrest
probable
cause
hearing
majority
recognizes
ante
based
appeals
determination
time
required
complete
procedures
far
know
period
bears
particular
relationship
long
takes
deport
group
aliens
matter
long
took
past
remove
zadvydas
case
demonstrates
repatriation
process
may
often
take
years
negotiate
involving
difficult
issues
establishing
citizenship
like
see
brief
petitioner
pp
expected
time
time
foreign
power
adopt
truculent
stance
respect
nations
yet
time
limit
presumptive
time
limit
goes
far
undercut
position
executive
repatriation
negotiations
thus
ill
serving
interest
foreign
nationals
country
concerned
aliens
might
wish
return
home
country
instance
strained
relationship
caused
difficult
repatriation
talks
might
prove
substantial
obstacle
aliens
well
addition
weakening
hand
government
ordered
release
help
encourage
dilatory
obstructive
tactics
aliens
emboldened
new
rule
good
reason
cooperate
making
repatriation
transfer
seem
foreseeable
alien
ordered
deported
also
less
incentive
cooperate
facilitate
expeditious
removal
released
even
supervised
basis
alien
held
immigration
naturalization
service
ins
detention
facility
neither
alien
family
find
urgency
assisting
petition
countries
accept
alien
back
alien
simply
remain
indefinitely
risk
community
posed
mandatory
release
aliens
dangerous
flight
risk
far
insubstantial
motivation
protect
citizenry
aliens
determined
dangerous
central
immigration
power
government
cites
statistical
studies
showing
high
recidivism
rates
released
aliens
one
government
accounting
office
study
cited
congress
floor
debates
antiterrorism
effective
death
penalty
act
stat
put
figure
high
percent
cong
rec
brief
respondents
seems
evident
criminal
record
accumulated
admitted
alien
time
likely
better
indicator
risk
factors
relied
upon
ins
initial
decision
admit
exclude
aliens
ordered
deported
result
committed
felony
proved
dangerous
suggestion
aliens
completed
prison
terms
longer
present
danger
simply
accord
reality
significant
risk
may
still
exist
determined
many
factors
set
forth
regulations
see
cfr
underworld
terrorist
links
subtle
may
overseas
beyond
jurisdiction
impose
felony
charges
furthermore
majority
rationale
seems
apply
alien
flees
prosecution
escapes
custody
country
fact
alien
deemed
inadmissible
fraud
time
entry
necessarily
distinguish
case
alien
whose
entry
legal
consider
example
fugitive
alien
enters
fraud
stealth
resides
five
years
significant
ties
community
though
still
presenting
danger
contrast
alien
entered
lawfully
month
later
committed
act
making
removable
rationale
apply
second
alien
first
apparent
majority
come
terms
distinctions
rationale
rule
majority
creates
permits
consideration
nothing
reasonable
foreseeability
removal
see
ante
standard
without
sound
basis
statutory
structure
also
susceptible
customary
judicial
inquiry
cf
ins
judiciary
well
positioned
shoulder
primary
responsibility
assessing
likelihood
importance
diplomatic
repercussions
majority
say
release
terrorists
special
circumstances
might
justify
heightened
deference
judgments
political
branches
respect
matters
national
security
ante
appears
rely
assessment
risk
premise
finds
inadequate
sustain
natural
reading
statute
reject
rationale
order
deny
power
attorney
general
invoke
rationale
save
analysis
rule
startling
breadth
invites
potentially
perverse
results
nations
may
refuse
admit
aliens
committed
certain
crimes
see
brief
petitioner
lithuanian
law
precludes
granting
citizenship
persons
coming
lithuania
sentenced
another
state
imprisonment
deliberate
crime
criminal
liability
imposed
laws
republic
lithuania
citations
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
often
aliens
committed
serious
crimes
may
released
immediately
majority
rule
example
presented
case
saroeut
ourk
cambodian
alien
determined
removable
held
pending
deportation
see
ourk
ins
cert
pending
ourk
convicted
rape
use
drugs
conjunction
kidnaping
girl
serving
months
prison
term
released
parole
returned
custody
twice
parole
violations
pet
cert
pp
ordered
deported
transferred
custody
ins
surprise
ins
determined
flight
risk
danger
community
yet
appeals
ninth
circuit
concluded
based
earlier
decision
kim
ho
reno
ourk
longer
held
pending
deportation
since
removal
cambodia
reasonably
foreseeable
app
pet
cert
pp
see
also
phetsany
ins
cert
pending
requiring
release
native
citizen
laos
convicted
attempted
premeditated
murder
mounsaveng
ins
cert
pending
releasing
citizen
laos
convicted
rape
girl
reckless
endangerment
involvement
fight
gunshots
fired
lim
reno
cert
pending
releasing
cambodian
convicted
rape
robbery
phuong
phuc
le
ins
cert
pending
releasing
vietnamese
citizen
convicted
voluntary
manslaughter
crime
involving
attempted
murder
two
persons
today
result
ensure
dangerous
individuals
hundreds
like
remain
free
executive
branch
tries
secure
removal
contrast
aliens
violate
mere
tourist
visa
requirements
ante
typical
case
held
pending
deportation
grounds
minor
offender
likely
removed
reason
suppose
congress
intended
odd
result
majority
rule
limited
aliens
lawfully
admitted
today
result
may
well
mandate
release
aliens
first
gained
entry
illegally
fraud
indeed
broad
enough
require
even
inadmissible
excludable
aliens
detained
border
set
free
community
holland
example
rosales
cuban
citizen
arrived
country
mariel
boatlift
upon
arrival
rosales
released
custody
relative
attorney
general
authority
parole
illegal
aliens
see
committed
multiple
crimes
convicted
imprisoned
serving
sentence
burglary
grand
larceny
rosales
escaped
prison
another
offenses
ultimately
served
time
ins
eventually
revoked
rosales
immigration
parole
ordered
deported
held
pending
deportation
subject
periodic
consideration
parole
cuban
review
plan
see
cfr
reasoning
remarkably
similar
majority
appeals
sixth
circuit
held
indefinite
detention
rosales
violated
fifth
amendment
due
process
rights
government
offered
credible
proof
possibility
cuba
may
accept
rosales
return
anytime
foreseeable
future
result
mariel
cubans
illegal
inadmissible
aliens
released
notwithstanding
criminal
history
obvious
flight
risk
seem
necessary
consequence
majority
construction
statute
majority
confidence
judiciary
handle
matters
appropriate
sensitivity
ante
allows
meaningful
category
confine
explain
sweeping
rule
provides
justification
wresting
sovereign
power
away
political
branches
first
place
support
judicially
manageable
standards
deciding
foreseeability
removal
curious
majority
approve
continued
detention
beyond
period
matter
period
deportation
reasonably
foreseeable
ins
detain
alien
dangerous
seem
irrelevant
constitution
majority
presumption
ins
detained
alien
little
reason
detention
permitted
removable
alien
liberty
interest
citizen
bring
acknowledge
established
proposition
likewise
far
evident
majority
theory
ins
condition
supervise
release
aliens
removable
reasonably
foreseeable
future
alien
may
doubt
returned
custody
upon
violation
conditions
true
threat
revocation
supervised
release
necessary
make
supervised
release
effective
fact
even
counsel
zadvydas
acknowledged
brief
petitioner
however
whole
foundation
position
collapses
today
assumes
role
foreign
relations
unprecedented
unfortunate
unwise
misstep
results
part
misunderstanding
liberty
interests
aliens
retain
issue
next
discussed
ii
aliens
claims
substantial
plight
real
face
continued
detention
perhaps
life
unless
shown
longer
present
flight
risk
danger
community
later
case
specific
circumstances
detention
may
present
substantial
constitutional
question
reason
however
framing
rule
ignores
law
governing
alien
status
persons
within
jurisdiction
aliens
entitled
protection
due
process
clause
liberty
due
process
clause
includes
protection
unlawful
arbitrary
personal
restraint
detention
liberty
rights
aliens
us
subject
limitations
conditions
applicable
citizens
however
see
mathews
diaz
exercise
broad
power
naturalization
immigration
congress
regularly
makes
rules
unacceptable
applied
citizens
party
proceeding
contests
initial
premise
aliens
determined
removable
fair
hearing
lawful
proper
procedures
section
sets
forth
proceedings
required
deciding
inadmissibility
removability
alien
including
hearing
immigration
judge
ins
carries
burden
establishing
clear
convincing
evidence
alien
deportable
see
also
berenyi
district
director
ins
government
seeks
deport
resident
alien
send
shores
carries
heavy
burden
proving
case
clear
unequivocal
convincing
evidence
internal
quotation
marks
footnotes
omitted
aliens
ordered
removed
pursuant
procedures
given
notice
right
appeal
decision
may
move
immigration
judge
reconsider
seek
discretionary
cancellation
removal
obtain
habeas
review
attorney
general
decision
consider
waiver
deportation
see
ins
cyr
ante
slip
result
aliens
like
zadvydas
arrive
removable
status
without
thorough
substantial
procedural
safeguards
majority
likely
correct
say
distinction
alien
entered
aliens
one
runs
throughout
immigration
law
ante
distinction
clear
might
seem
however
doubt
suffice
confine
rationale
adopted
majority
case
often
comes
mind
one
tests
distinction
shaughnessy
ex
rel
mezei
considered
situation
alien
denied
entry
detained
ellis
island
detention
foreseeable
end
though
mezei
inadmissible
seemed
country
case
presented
problem
asking
whether
alien
country
whether
situation
still
foreign
shores
whether
fell
legal
category
somewhere
though
true
still
clear
resolve
case
held
alien
right
hearing
secure
release
approximately
months
denied
mezei
relief
attorney
general
released
parole
appears
mezei
never
returned
ins
custody
though
admitted
citizen
lawful
permanent
resident
see
weisselberg
exclusion
detention
aliens
lessons
lives
ellen
knauff
ignatz
mezei
rev
majority
says
earlier
presence
aliens
distinguishes
cases
mezei
reasons
given
submitted
majority
incorrect
major
conclusions
events
even
assumed
aliens
class
rights
mezei
makes
difference
purposes
dissent
necessary
rely
upon
mezei
said
must
made
clear
aliens
position
far
different
aliens
lawful
right
remain
removable
rights
must
defined
accordance
status
due
process
analysis
must
begin
careful
description
asserted
right
reno
flores
long
held
alien
seeking
initial
admission
requests
privilege
constitutional
rights
regarding
application
power
admit
exclude
aliens
sovereign
prerogative
landon
plasencia
true
aliens
like
zadvydas
face
final
order
removal
alien
removable
right
basic
immigration
laws
remain
country
removal
orders
reflect
determination
aliens
ties
community
insufficient
justify
continued
presence
alien
admission
country
conditioned
upon
compliance
laws
removal
consequence
breach
understanding
true
accorded
procedural
protections
aliens
admitted
country
stopped
border
observing
continuously
present
alien
entitled
fair
hearing
threatened
deportation
ibid
mezei
supra
liens
passed
gates
even
illegally
may
expelled
proceedings
conforming
traditional
standards
fairness
encompassed
due
process
law
alien
threshold
initial
entry
stands
different
footing
whatever
procedure
authorized
congress
due
process
far
alien
denied
entry
quoting
ex
rel
knauff
shaughnessy
removable
excludable
aliens
situated
differently
order
removal
entered
removable
alien
virtue
continued
presence
possesses
interest
remaining
excludable
alien
seeks
privilege
entry
still
removable
inadmissible
aliens
entitled
free
detention
arbitrary
capricious
detention
incident
removal
detention
justified
punishment
confinement
conditions
designed
order
punish
see
wong
wing
accords
international
views
detention
refugees
asylum
seekers
see
report
nations
working
group
arbitrary
detention
doc
nations
high
commissioner
refugees
guidelines
applicable
criteria
standards
relating
detention
neither
arbitrary
capricious
detain
aliens
necessary
avoid
risk
flight
danger
community
whether
due
process
right
denied
removable
aliens
flight
risks
dangers
community
detained
turns
substantive
right
free
whether
adequate
procedures
review
cases
allowing
persons
subject
detention
show
rehabilitation
new
appreciation
responsibilities
standards
longer
present
special
risks
danger
put
large
procedures
determine
review
detention
go
far
toward
objective
regulations
promulgated
notice
comment
attorney
general
given
structure
discretion
delegated
ina
order
ensure
fairness
regularity
ins
detention
decisions
first
ins
provides
initial
postcustody
review
expiration
removal
period
district
director
conducts
record
review
cfr
alien
entitled
present
relevant
information
support
release
district
director
discretion
interview
alien
personal
evaluation
end
period
alien
held
custody
transferred
postorder
detention
unit
ins
headquarters
ordinary
course
conduct
initial
custody
review
within
three
months
transfer
ii
ins
determines
alien
remain
detention
panel
ins
officers
interviews
alien
makes
recommendation
ins
headquarters
regulations
provide
extensive
nonexhaustive
list
factors
considered
recommendation
release
detain
include
nature
number
disciplinary
infractions
detainee
criminal
conduct
criminal
convictions
including
consideration
nature
severity
alien
convictions
sentences
imposed
time
actually
served
probation
criminal
parole
history
evidence
recidivism
criminal
history
psychiatric
psychological
reports
pertaining
detainee
mental
health
vidence
rehabilitation
avorable
factors
including
ties
number
close
relatives
rior
immigration
violations
history
likelihood
alien
significant
flight
risk
may
abscond
avoid
removal
including
history
escapes
probative
information
another
review
must
occur
within
one
year
mandatory
evaluations
year
thereafter
alien
requests
ins
discretion
grant
frequent
reviews
iii
ins
must
provide
alien
advance
written
notice
custody
reviews
must
afford
alien
opportunity
submit
relevant
materials
consideration
ii
alien
may
assisted
representative
choice
review
ii
ins
must
provide
alien
copy
decision
including
brief
statement
reasons
continued
detention
context
proper
analysis
informed
cases
involving
determinations
morrissey
brewer
example
held
amount
process
due
individual
whose
parole
revoked
liberty
parolee
although
indeterminate
includes
many
core
values
unqualified
liberty
see
also
board
pardons
allen
rejected
morrissey
suggestion
state
justify
parole
revocation
without
informal
procedural
guarantees
iven
previous
conviction
proper
imposition
conditions
recognized
state
overwhelming
interest
able
return
individual
imprisonment
without
burden
new
adversary
criminal
trial
ibid
held
review
process
need
include
judicial
officer
formal
proceeding
conducted
neutral
administrative
official
majority
expresses
concern
regulations
place
burden
alien
show
longer
dangerous
question
adjudicated
later
case
raising
issue
noted
procedural
protection
real
illusory
criteria
obtaining
release
far
insurmountable
statistics
show
february
aliens
provided
custody
reviews
expiration
removal
period
aliens
released
fed
reg
reply
brief
petitioners
result
although
alien
carries
burden
prove
detention
longer
justified
showing
unreasonable
burden
like
parolee
morrissey
aware
conditions
release
aliens
instant
cases
notice
constructive
actual
ina
imposes
consequence
commission
certain
crimes
deportation
also
possibility
continued
detention
cases
deportation
immediately
feasible
like
prisoner
board
pardons
allen
sought
review
discretionary
decision
denying
parole
eligibility
removable
aliens
held
pending
deportation
due
process
liberty
right
ins
conduct
review
procedures
place
see
ins
arbitrary
categorical
manner
deny
alien
access
administrative
processes
place
review
continued
detention
habeas
jurisdiction
lie
redress
due
process
violation
caused
denial
mandated
procedures
cfr
posture
instant
cases
however
neither
zadvydas
argues
attorney
general
applied
procedures
improper
manner
challenge
attorney
general
authority
detain
removal
longer
foreseeable
government
conceded
habeas
jurisdiction
available
review
alien
challenge
detention
following
entry
final
order
deportation
brief
respondents
tr
oral
arg
although
detail
nature
habeas
review
result
need
decide
today
whether
extent
habeas
review
attorney
general
determination
detained
alien
continues
dangerous
flight
risk
given
undeniable
deprivation
liberty
caused
detention
might
substantial
questions
concerning
severity
necessary
community
risk
adequacy
judicial
review
specific
cases
alleged
justification
concluding
alien
dangerous
flight
risk
issues
matters
presented
us
events
judicial
review
available
inquiry
required
majority
focuses
wrong
factors
concepts
flight
risk
future
dangerousness
manageable
legal
categories
see
kansas
hendricks
foucha
louisiana
majority
instead
judiciary
review
status
repatriation
negotiations
one
thought
paradigmatic
examples
nonjusticiable
inquiry
see
ins
inquiry
require
executive
branch
surrender
primacy
foreign
affairs
submit
reports
courts
respecting
ongoing
negotiations
international
sphere
high
officials
department
state
called
testify
status
negotiations
finds
manageable
appropriate
role
judiciary
review
single
discrete
case
deciding
whether
fair
procedures
adequate
judicial
safeguards
determine
whether
alien
dangerous
community
detention
justified
rule
serious
misconception
proper
judicial
function
congress
enacted
reasons
reverse
decision
appeals
ninth
circuit
affirm
judgment
appeals
fifth
circuit
dissent
footnotes
together
ashcroft
attorney
general
et
al
kim
ho
certiorari
appeals
ninth
circuit
footnotes
also
cites
landon
plasencia
oblique
support
claim
due
process
protection
afforded
aliens
final
order
removal
may
vary
depending
upon
status
circumstance
ante
case
entirely
inapt
involve
alien
subject
final
order
deportation
also
cites
johnson
eisentrager
ante
case
doubly
irrelevant
dealt
deportation
military
detention
enemy
aliens
outside
territorial
jurisdiction
rejected
habeas
corpus
jurisdiction
anyway