terminix
companies
dobson
argued
october
decided
january
termite
prevention
contract
petitioner
exterminators
respondent
gwin
homeowner
specified
controversy
thereunder
settled
exclusively
arbitration
respondents
dobson
purchased
gwin
home
sued
state
following
termite
infestation
petitioners
asked
denied
stay
allow
arbitration
contract
federal
arbitration
act
makes
enforceable
written
arbitration
provision
contract
evidencing
transaction
involving
commerce
alabama
affirmed
basis
state
statute
invalidating
predispute
arbitration
agreements
ruling
federal
act
applies
time
parties
entered
contract
accepted
arbitration
clause
contemplated
substantial
interstate
activity
despite
activities
found
parties
contemplated
transaction
primarily
local
substantially
interstate
held
section
interstate
commerce
language
read
broadly
extend
act
reach
limits
congress
commerce
clause
power
use
words
evidencing
involving
restrict
act
application
thereby
allow
state
apply
antiarbitration
law
policy
pp
legal
background
demonstrates
act
basic
purpose
overcoming
judicial
hostility
arbitration
agreements
applies
federal
diversity
cases
state
courts
state
statutes
invalidating
agreements
see
southland
keating
inappropriate
overrule
southland
permit
alabama
apply
antiarbitration
statute
since
case
considered
page
ii
basic
arguments
raised
nothing
significant
changed
subsequently
since
interim
private
parties
likely
written
contracts
relying
southland
since
congress
southland
enacted
legislation
extending
retracting
scope
arbitration
pp
statute
language
background
structure
establish
involving
commerce
words
functional
equivalent
phrase
affecting
commerce
normally
signals
congress
intent
exercise
commerce
power
full
see
russell
linguistic
permissibility
interpretation
demonstrated
dictionary
definitions
involve
affect
mean
thing
moreover
act
legislative
history
extent
informative
indicates
expansive
congressional
intent
described
act
reach
expansively
coinciding
commerce
clause
see
southland
supra
finally
broad
interpretation
language
consistent
act
basic
purpose
narrower
interpretation
create
new
unfamiliar
test
unnecessarily
complicate
law
breed
litigation
reasons
act
scope
said
expanded
along
commerce
power
years
even
though
congress
passed
act
might
well
thought
commerce
clause
stretch
far
turned
mine
workers
coronado
coal
leather
workers
herkert
meisel
trunk
bernhardt
polygraphic
america
distinguished
pp
section
evidencing
transaction
phrase
means
transaction
contract
evidences
must
turn
fact
involved
interstate
commerce
several
reasons
commerce
fact
interpretation
faithful
statute
contemplation
parties
test
adopted
courts
first
latter
interpretation
viewed
terms
statute
basic
purpose
seems
anomalous
invites
litigation
contemplated
often
turn
validity
arbitration
clause
upon
happenstance
whether
parties
thought
insert
reference
interstate
commerce
document
mention
initial
conversation
fits
awkwardly
rest
second
statute
language
permits
commerce
fact
interpretation
although
interpretation
concededly
leaves
little
work
word
evidencing
nothing
act
history
suggests
limiting
task
language
third
force
basic
practical
argument
underlying
contemplation
page
iii
parties
test
encroaching
powers
reserved
must
avoided
diminished
following
holdings
act
displaces
contrary
state
law
finally
despite
amicus
claim
unclear
whether
objective
version
test
better
protect
consumers
asked
sign
form
contracts
businesses
event
authorizes
invalidate
arbitration
clause
upon
grounds
exist
law
equity
revocation
contract
thereby
gives
method
protecting
consumers
unwanted
arbitration
provisions
pp
parties
contest
transaction
case
fact
involved
interstate
commerce
breyer
delivered
opinion
rehnquist
stevens
kennedy
souter
ginsburg
joined
filed
concurring
opinion
scalia
filed
dissenting
opinion
thomas
filed
dissenting
opinion
scalia
joined
terminix
companies
dobson
bartow
farr
iii
washington
richard
taranto
farr
smith
taranto
joseph
jones
julian
motes
sirote
permutt
briefs
petitioners
allan
chason
bay
minette
kenneth
chesebro
chason
chason
jonathan
massey
kenneth
hooks
pittman
hooks
marsh
dutton
hollis
briefs
respondents
justice
breyer
delivered
opinion
case
concerns
reach
federal
arbitration
act
section
makes
enforceable
written
arbitration
provision
contract
evidencing
transaction
involving
commerce
emphasis
added
read
phrase
broadly
extending
act
reach
limits
congress
commerce
clause
power
two
underscored
words
involving
evidencing
significantly
restrict
act
application
conclude
broader
reading
act
correct
one
reverse
state
judgment
contrary
august
steven
gwin
respondent
owned
house
birmingham
alabama
bought
lifetime
termite
protection
plan
plan
local
office
terminix
companies
franchise
terminix
international
company
plan
promised
protect
gwin
house
attack
subterranean
termites
reinspect
periodically
provide
treatment
found
necessary
repair
damage
caused
new
terminix
companies
dobson
termite
infestations
app
terminix
international
guarantee
fulfillment
terms
plan
ibid
plan
contract
document
provided
writing
controversy
claim
arising
relating
interpretation
performance
breach
provision
agreement
shall
settled
exclusively
arbitration
emphasis
added
alabama
upheld
denial
stay
basis
state
statute
code
making
written
predispute
arbitration
agreements
invalid
unenforceable
reach
conclusion
find
federal
arbitration
act
conflicting
state
law
apply
termite
contract
made
finding
considered
federal
act
inapplicable
connection
termite
contract
interstate
commerce
slight
view
act
applies
terminix
companies
dobson
contract
time
parties
entered
contract
accepted
arbitration
clause
contemplated
substantial
interstate
activity
ibid
emphasis
original
quoting
metro
industrial
painting
terminal
constr
lumbard
concurring
cert
denied
despite
interstate
activities
like
terminix
multistate
firm
shipped
treatment
repair
material
state
found
parties
contemplated
transaction
primarily
local
substantially
interstate
several
state
courts
federal
district
courts
like
alabama
interpreted
act
language
requiring
parties
contract
contemplated
interstate
commerce
connection
see
burke
county
public
schools
bd
ed
shaver
partnership
palmer
constr
wichita
band
instrument
app
lacheney
profitkey
supp
ed
several
federal
appellate
courts
however
interpreted
language
differently
reaching
limits
congress
commerce
clause
power
see
foster
turley
robert
lawrence
devonshire
fabrics
cert
dism
cf
snyder
smith
cert
denied
granted
certiorari
resolve
conflict
said
conclude
broader
reading
statute
right
one
terminix
companies
dobson
ii
reach
main
issues
case
must
set
forth
three
items
legal
background
first
basic
purpose
federal
arbitration
act
overcome
courts
refusals
enforce
agreements
arbitrate
see
volt
information
sciences
board
trustees
leland
stanford
junior
origins
refusals
apparently
lie
ancient
times
english
courts
fought
extension
jurisdiction
opposed
anything
altogether
deprive
every
one
jurisdiction
bernhardt
polygraphic
america
frankfurter
concurring
quoting
asphalt
refining
trinidad
lake
petroleum
sdny
quoting
scott
avery
cas
campbell
american
courts
initially
followed
english
practice
perhaps
stand
ing
upon
antiquity
rule
prohibiting
arbitration
clause
enforcement
rather
upon
excellence
reason
bernhardt
polygraphic
supra
quoting
asphalt
refining
supra
regardless
congress
passed
arbitration
act
motivated
first
foremost
desire
change
rule
dean
witter
reynolds
byrd
intended
courts
enforce
arbitration
agreements
parties
entered
ibid
omitted
place
agreements
upon
footing
contracts
volt
information
sciences
supra
quoting
scherk
second
initially
assumed
federal
arbitration
act
represented
exercise
congress
article
iii
power
ordain
establish
federal
courts
art
iii
see
southland
keating
terminix
companies
dobson
dissenting
collecting
cases
however
held
act
based
upon
confined
incontestable
federal
foundations
control
interstate
commerce
admiralty
prima
paint
flood
conklin
mfg
quoting
considered
following
complicated
argument
act
provisions
contract
remedies
important
often
thus
amount
substantive
procedural
provisions
law
erie
tompkins
made
clear
federal
courts
must
apply
state
substantive
law
diversity
cases
see
also
hanna
plumer
therefore
federal
courts
must
apply
federal
arbitration
act
diversity
cases
responded
agreeing
act
set
forth
substantive
law
concluding
nonetheless
act
applied
diversity
cases
congress
intended
wrote
congress
may
prescribe
federal
courts
conduct
respect
subject
matter
congress
plainly
power
legislate
prima
paint
supra
third
holding
prima
paint
led
question
congress
intend
act
also
apply
state
courts
federal
arbitration
act
conflicting
state
law
state
courts
apply
antiarbitration
rules
cases
thereby
reaching
results
different
reached
otherwise
similar
federal
diversity
cases
southland
keating
supra
decided
congress
wanted
state
federal
courts
reach
different
outcomes
validity
arbitration
similar
cases
concluded
federal
arbitration
act
state
law
held
state
courts
apply
state
statutes
invalidate
arbitration
agreements
terminix
companies
dobson
set
forth
background
respondents
supported
state
attorneys
general
ask
us
overrule
southland
thereby
permit
alabama
apply
antiarbitration
statute
case
irrespective
proper
interpretation
southland
however
recognized
issue
difficult
one
considered
basic
arguments
respondents
amici
raise
even
though
issues
thoroughly
briefed
time
nothing
significant
changed
years
subsequent
southland
later
cases
eroded
southland
authority
unforeseen
practical
problems
arisen
moreover
interim
private
parties
likely
written
contracts
relying
upon
southland
authority
congress
southland
enacted
legislation
extending
retracting
scope
arbitration
see
eliminating
act
state
doctrine
bar
arbitration
international
arbitration
reasons
find
inappropriate
reconsider
law
therefore
proceed
basic
interpretive
questions
aware
interpreting
act
seeks
broadly
overcome
judicial
hostility
arbitration
agreements
applies
federal
state
courts
must
decide
case
whether
act
used
language
interstate
commerce
nonetheless
limits
act
application
thereby
carving
important
statutory
niche
state
remains
free
apply
antiarbitration
law
policy
conclude
terminix
companies
dobson
iii
federal
arbitration
act
provides
written
provision
maritime
transaction
contract
evidencing
transaction
involving
commerce
settle
arbitration
controversy
thereafter
arising
contract
transaction
shall
valid
irrevocable
enforceable
save
upon
grounds
exist
law
equity
revocation
contract
emphasis
added
examining
statute
language
background
structure
conclude
word
involving
broad
indeed
functional
equivalent
affecting
one
thing
interpretation
linguistically
terminix
companies
dobson
speaking
permissible
dictionary
finds
instances
involve
affect
sometimes
mean
thing
oxford
english
dictionary
ed
providing
examples
dating
back
century
involve
means
include
affect
operation
another
act
legislative
history
extent
informative
indicates
expansive
congressional
intent
see
act
control
interstate
commerce
reaches
actual
physical
interstate
shipment
goods
also
contracts
relating
interstate
commerce
cong
rec
act
affects
contracts
relating
interstate
subjects
contracts
admiralty
remarks
graham
joint
hearings
subcommittees
committees
judiciary
hereinafter
joint
hearings
testimony
charles
bernheimer
chairman
committee
arbitration
chamber
commerce
state
new
york
agreeing
proposed
bill
relates
contracts
arising
interstate
commerce
testimony
julius
cohen
drafter
american
bar
association
much
proposed
bill
language
act
reflects
part
strategy
rid
law
anachronism
get
ting
federal
law
cover
interstate
foreign
commerce
admiralty
see
also
defining
word
commerce
language
commerce
clause
previously
described
act
reach
expansively
coinciding
commerce
clause
see
perry
thomas
act
embodies
congress
intent
provide
enforcement
arbitration
agreements
within
full
reach
commerce
clause
southland
keating
involving
commerce
requirement
constitutionally
terminix
companies
dobson
necessary
qualification
act
reach
marking
permissible
outer
limit
see
also
prima
paint
flood
conklin
mfg
harlan
concurring
endorsing
robert
lawrence
devonshire
fabrics
congress
enacting
faa
took
pains
utilize
much
power
finally
broad
interpretation
language
consistent
act
basic
purpose
put
arbitration
provisions
footing
contract
terms
scherk
conversely
narrower
interpretation
consistent
act
purpose
unless
unreasonably
narrowed
flow
commerce
interpretation
create
new
unfamiliar
test
lying
somewhere
land
commerce
affecting
commerce
thereby
unnecessarily
complicating
law
breeding
litigation
statute
seeks
avoid
recognize
arguments
contrary
deal
congress
passed
act
might
well
thought
commerce
clause
stretch
far
turned
unusual
similar
circumstances
ask
whether
scope
statute
expand
along
expansion
commerce
clause
power
answer
question
affirmatively
reasons
set
forth
see
mclain
real
estate
bd
new
orleans
hospital
building
trustees
rex
hospital
gwins
dobsons
point
two
cases
containing
believe
favorable
language
mine
workers
coronado
coal
leather
workers
herkert
meisel
trunk
say
said
one
might
draw
distinction
terminix
companies
dobson
one
hand
cases
involve
interstate
commerce
intrinsically
hand
cases
affecting
interstate
commerce
directly
within
federal
regulatory
power
mine
workers
supra
emphasis
added
leather
workers
supra
one
read
cases
driving
wedge
involve
affecting
yet
cases
construing
statute
containing
words
involving
commerce
furthermore
nothing
suggests
drafters
faa
looked
cases
source
cases
use
phrase
involve
intrinsically
word
involving
alone
sum
cases
support
respondents
position
gwins
dobsons
far
better
reason
point
different
case
bernhardt
polygraphic
america
case
bernhardt
new
york
resident
entered
employment
contract
containing
arbitration
clause
new
york
polygraphic
new
york
corporation
bernhardt
perform
contract
later
became
resident
vermont
faced
question
whether
light
erie
federal
apply
federal
arbitration
act
diversity
case
faced
state
law
hostile
arbitration
reach
question
however
decided
contract
involv
interstate
commerce
therefore
fell
outside
act
since
congress
constitutionally
speaking
applied
act
bernhardt
contract
say
parties
say
act
word
involving
reaches
far
commerce
clause
best
response
argument
point
way
reasoned
bernhardt
said
said
reason
act
apply
bernhardt
contract
terminix
companies
dobson
showing
petitioner
performing
duties
employment
contract
working
commerce
producing
goods
commerce
engaging
activity
affected
commerce
within
meaning
decisions
bernhardt
supra
emphasis
added
omitted
iv
section
applies
contract
evidencing
transaction
involving
commerce
emphasis
added
second
interpretive
question
focuses
underscored
words
evidencing
transaction
mean
transaction
contract
evidences
must
turn
fact
involved
interstate
commerce
mean
many
years
ago
second
circuit
chief
judge
lumbard
said
phrase
meant
considerably
wrote
significant
question
whether
carrying
terms
contract
parties
cross
state
lines
whether
time
entered
accepted
arbitration
clause
contemplated
substantial
interstate
activity
cogent
evidence
regarding
state
mind
terminix
companies
dobson
time
terms
contract
face
evidences
interstate
traffic
contract
come
within
addition
evidence
parties
expected
contract
performed
performed
relevant
whether
substantial
interstate
activity
contemplated
metro
industrial
painting
terminal
constr
lumbard
concurring
second
emphasis
added
find
interpretive
choice
difficult
several
reasons
conclude
first
interpretation
commerce
fact
faithful
statute
second
contemplation
parties
first
contemplation
parties
interpretation
viewed
terms
statute
basic
purpose
seems
anomalous
interpretation
invites
litigation
contemplated
congress
intend
test
risks
kind
costs
delay
litigation
circumstances
contract
formation
congress
wrote
act
help
parties
avoid
see
moses
cone
memorial
hospital
mercury
constr
act
calls
summary
speedy
disposition
motions
petitions
enforce
arbitration
clauses
moreover
interpretation
often
turn
validity
arbitration
clause
perspective
statute
basic
purpose
seems
happenstance
namely
whether
parties
happened
think
insert
reference
interstate
commerce
document
happened
mention
initial
conversation
parties
sales
contract
arbitration
clause
might
naturally
think
goods
terminix
companies
dobson
sold
arbitration
naturally
think
interstate
commerce
connection
interpretation
fits
awkwardly
rest
section
example
permits
parties
agree
submit
arbitration
existing
controversy
arising
contract
made
earlier
congress
want
risk
later
arbitration
agreement
even
fully
connected
interstate
commerce
simply
parties
properly
contemplate
write
interstate
aspects
earlier
contract
first
interpretation
requiring
transaction
fact
involve
interstate
commerce
avoids
anomaly
avoids
anomalous
effects
growing
contemplation
parties
test
second
statute
language
permits
commerce
fact
interpretation
interpretation
concede
leaves
little
work
word
evidencing
phrase
contract
evidencing
transaction
perform
every
contract
evidences
transaction
perhaps
congress
want
word
perform
much
work
act
history
extent
informative
indicates
act
supporters
saw
act
part
effort
make
arbitration
agreements
universally
enforceable
wanted
get
federal
law
cover
areas
constitution
authorized
congress
legislate
namely
interstate
foreign
commerce
admiralty
joint
hearings
testimony
julius
cohen
urged
congress
model
act
new
york
statute
made
enforceable
written
arbitration
provision
written
contract
act
apr
ch
laws
hearing
subcommittee
senate
committee
judiciary
testimony
charles
bernheimer
early
drafts
made
enforceable
written
arbitration
provision
contract
terminix
companies
dobson
maritime
transaction
transaction
involving
commerce
sess
emphasis
added
sess
sess
members
congress
looking
phrase
might
thought
words
contract
standing
alone
went
beyond
congress
constitutional
authority
might
simply
connected
words
later
words
transaction
involving
commerce
thereby
creating
phrase
became
law
nothing
act
history
suggests
limiting
task
language
third
basic
practical
argument
underlying
contemplation
parties
test
judge
lumbard
words
need
cautious
construing
act
lest
excessively
encroach
powers
congressional
policy
constitution
reserve
metro
industrial
painting
supra
lumbard
concurring
practical
force
argument
diminished
light
later
holdings
act
displace
state
law
contrary
see
southland
keating
perry
thomas
finally
note
amicus
curiae
argues
objective
reasonable
person
oriented
version
contemplation
parties
test
ground
interpretation
better
protect
consumers
asked
sign
form
contracts
businesses
agree
congress
enacting
law
needs
consumers
well
others
mind
see
act
avoiding
delay
expense
litigation
appeal
big
business
little
business
alike
corporate
interests
individuals
indeed
arbitration
advantages
often
seem
helpful
individuals
say
complaining
product
need
less
expensive
alternative
litigation
see
terminix
companies
dobson
advantages
arbitration
many
usually
cheaper
faster
litigation
simpler
procedural
evidentiary
rules
normally
minimizes
hostility
less
disruptive
ongoing
future
business
dealings
among
parties
often
flexible
regard
scheduling
times
places
hearings
discovery
devices
according
american
arbitration
association
also
amicus
claims
involve
amounts
another
third
involve
claims
average
processing
time
less
six
months
app
brief
american
arbitration
association
amicus
curiae
uncertain
however
objective
version
contemplation
test
help
consumers
sometimes
course
permit
say
consumer
potentially
large
damage
claims
disavow
contract
arbitration
provision
proceed
equally
permit
say
local
business
entities
disavow
contract
arbitration
provisions
thereby
leaving
typical
consumer
small
damage
claim
seeks
say
value
defective
refrigerator
television
set
without
remedy
remedy
costs
delays
eat
value
eventual
small
recovery
event
gives
method
protecting
consumers
unfair
pressure
agree
contract
unwanted
arbitration
provision
may
regulate
contracts
including
arbitration
clauses
general
contract
law
principles
may
invalidate
arbitration
clause
upon
grounds
exist
law
equity
revocation
contract
emphasis
added
may
decide
contract
fair
enough
enforce
basic
terms
price
service
credit
fair
enough
terminix
companies
dobson
enforce
arbitration
clause
act
makes
state
policy
unlawful
kind
policy
place
arbitration
clauses
unequal
footing
directly
contrary
act
language
congress
intent
see
volt
information
sciences
reasons
accept
commerce
fact
interpretation
reading
act
language
insisting
transaction
fact
involve
interstate
commerce
even
parties
contemplate
interstate
commerce
connection
parties
contest
transaction
case
fact
involved
interstate
commerce
addition
multistate
nature
terminix
material
used
allegedly
inadequate
efforts
carry
terms
plan
came
outside
alabama
consequently
judgment
alabama
reversed
case
remanded
proceedings
consistent
opinion
ordered
terminix
companies
dobson
agree
construction
federal
arbitration
act
applied
federal
courts
interpretation
comports
fully
understanding
congressional
intent
restrictive
definition
evidencing
involving
doubtless
foster
prearbitration
litigation
frustrate
purpose
statute
applied
state
courts
however
effect
broad
formulation
troublesome
reading
adopted
today
displace
many
state
statutes
carefully
calibrated
protect
consumers
see
mont
code
ann
refusing
enforce
arbitration
clauses
consumer
contracts
consideration
less
state
procedural
requirements
aimed
ensuring
knowing
voluntary
consent
see
code
ann
supp
requiring
notice
arbitration
provision
prominently
placed
first
page
contract
long
adhered
view
discussed
congress
designed
federal
arbitration
act
apply
federal
courts
apply
act
state
courts
makes
little
sense
read
differently
context
terminix
companies
dobson
end
agreement
construction
rests
largely
wisdom
maintaining
uniform
standard
continue
believe
congress
never
intended
federal
arbitration
act
apply
state
courts
strayed
far
afield
giving
act
broad
compass
see
southland
keating
dissenting
see
also
perry
thomas
dissenting
york
international
alabama
oxygen
dissenting
remand
often
said
effect
federal
statute
fundamentally
question
congressional
intent
see
cipollone
liggett
group
slip
english
general
electric
schneidewind
anr
pipeline
rice
santa
fe
elevator
indeed
held
field
congress
said
includes
areas
traditionally
occupied
congressional
intent
supersede
state
laws
must
clear
manifest
english
supra
quoting
jones
rath
packing
yet
past
decade
abandoned
pretense
ascertaining
congressional
intent
respect
federal
arbitration
act
building
instead
case
case
edifice
creation
see
perry
thomas
supra
stevens
dissenting
last
years
effectively
rewritten
statute
give
scope
congress
certainly
intend
doubt
congress
enact
first
instance
federal
arbitration
statute
displaces
state
arbitration
laws
also
doubt
congress
enacted
statute
terminix
companies
dobson
writing
clean
slate
adhere
view
affirm
alabama
decision
points
years
passed
since
southland
several
subsequent
cases
built
upon
reasoning
parties
undoubtedly
made
contracts
reliance
interpretation
act
interim
reflection
persuaded
considerations
stare
decisis
said
special
force
area
statutory
interpretation
patterson
mclean
credit
union
acquiesce
today
judgment
though
wrong
southland
proved
unworkable
always
congress
remains
free
alter
done
ibid
today
decision
caps
effort
expand
federal
arbitration
act
although
decision
built
logically
upon
decisions
preceding
initial
building
block
southland
laid
faulty
foundation
acquiesce
today
judgment
special
justification
overrule
southland
arizona
rumsey
remains
congress
correct
interpretation
wishes
preserve
state
autonomy
state
courts
terminix
companies
dobson
justice
scalia
dissenting
previously
joined
two
judgments
rested
upon
holding
southland
keating
see
volt
information
sciences
board
trustees
leland
stanford
junior
perry
thomas
neither
cases
however
party
ask
southland
overruled
therefore
necessary
consider
question
present
case
contrast
one
respondents
central
arguments
southland
wrongly
decided
request
overruling
supported
amicus
brief
signed
attorneys
general
reasons
set
forth
justice
thomas
opinion
join
agree
respondents
belatedly
justice
southland
clearly
misconstrued
federal
arbitration
act
believe
proper
application
stare
decisis
prevents
correction
mistake
adhering
southland
entails
permanent
unauthorized
eviction
power
adjudicate
potentially
large
class
disputes
abandoning
impair
reliance
terminix
companies
dobson
interests
degree
justifies
evil
primary
behavior
affected
rule
conduct
retroactively
changed
perhaps
forum
violation
determined
remedied
doubt
many
contracts
arbitration
clauses
forgone
entered
significantly
higher
remuneration
absent
southland
guarantee
moreover
reliance
southland
make
significant
difference
rescission
contract
mistake
law
often
available
see
corbin
corbin
contracts
ed
supp
restatement
second
contracts
shall
future
dissent
judgments
rest
southland
however
stand
ready
join
four
justices
overruling
since
southland
become
correct
time
course
future
lawmaking
seems
unlikely
affected
existence
cf
pennsylvania
union
gas
scalia
concurring
part
dissenting
part
accumulated
private
reliance
likely
increase
beyond
level
already
achieved
contracts
terminable
term
reasons
respectfully
dissent
judgment
terminix
companies
dobson
justice
thomas
justice
scalia
joins
dissenting
disagree
majority
threshold
case
reach
question
decides
view
federal
arbitration
act
faa
apply
state
courts
respectfully
dissent
southland
keating
concluded
faa
appl
ies
state
well
federal
courts
withdr
aws
power
require
judicial
forum
resolution
claims
contracting
parties
agreed
resolve
arbitration
view
aspects
southland
wrong
section
faa
declares
arbitration
clause
contained
contract
evidencing
transaction
involving
commerce
shall
valid
irrevocable
enforceable
save
upon
grounds
exist
law
equity
revocation
contract
see
also
defining
commerce
relevant
terminix
companies
dobson
mean
commerce
among
several
foreign
nations
face
considered
context
draws
apparent
distinction
federal
courts
state
courts
nearly
years
congress
enacted
faa
suggest
applied
state
courts
see
robert
lawrence
devonshire
fabrics
cert
dism
state
agreed
see
rea
express
missouri
pacific
tex
civ
app
stating
faa
applies
noting
waived
case
hand
cf
rubewa
products
watson
quality
turkey
products
waited
conclude
strong
dissent
justice
extends
see
southland
supra
explanation
delay
simple
statute
congress
enacted
actually
applies
federal
courts
time
faa
passage
laws
governing
enforceability
arbitration
agreements
generally
thought
deal
purely
matters
procedure
rather
substance
directed
solely
mechanisms
resolving
underlying
disputes
cardozo
explained
arbitration
form
procedure
whereby
differences
may
settled
definition
rights
wrongs
differences
grow
berkovitz
arbib
houlberg
holding
new
york
arbitration
statute
faa
copied
purely
procedural
extraordinary
terminix
companies
dobson
congress
attempt
prescribe
procedural
rules
state
courts
see
ex
parte
gounis
mo
describing
rule
congress
regulate
control
state
courts
modes
procedure
one
general
principles
come
accepted
settled
constitutional
terminix
companies
dobson
law
faa
enacted
general
background
one
read
attempt
see
baum
pressman
enforcement
commercial
arbitration
agreements
federal
courts
rev
noting
faa
purport
extend
teeth
state
proceedings
though
arguing
constitutionally
done
williston
thompson
law
contracts
rev
ed
inasmuch
arbitration
acts
deemed
procedural
faa
applies
federal
courts
omitted
cf
southland
dissenting
describing
unambiguous
legislative
history
effect
indeed
judge
reported
cases
appears
state
even
asked
enforce
statute
many
years
passage
faa
federal
courts
part
refused
apply
state
arbitration
statutes
cases
faa
inapplicable
see
california
prune
apricot
growers
assn
catz
american
refusal
outgrowth
decision
swift
tyson
pet
held
certain
categories
state
judicial
decisions
laws
purposes
rules
decision
act
hence
binding
federal
courts
even
swift
state
statutes
unambiguously
constituted
laws
rather
federal
courts
apply
state
arbitration
statutes
statutes
considered
substantive
laws
see
california
prune
supra
undoubtedly
true
federal
proper
cases
may
enforce
state
laws
principle
applicable
state
legislation
invoke
creates
establishes
substantive
general
right
short
state
arbitration
statutes
prescribed
rules
state
courts
faa
prescribed
rules
federal
courts
terminix
companies
dobson
easy
understand
lawyers
classified
arbitration
statutes
procedural
arbitration
agreement
species
clause
without
laying
rules
decision
identifies
adjudicator
disputes
strong
argument
made
clauses
concern
procedure
rather
substance
cf
fed
rules
civ
proc
district
consent
parties
may
refer
case
magistrate
resolution
district
may
refer
issues
special
master
contractual
provision
deals
purely
matters
judicial
procedure
one
might
well
conclude
questions
whether
enforced
also
relate
procedure
context
confirms
understanding
faa
original
meaning
sections
statute
plainly
application
state
courts
rather
prescribe
rules
either
federal
courts
arbitration
proceedings
thus
provides
suit
proceeding
brought
courts
upon
issue
referable
arbitration
agreement
writing
arbitration
suit
pending
upon
satisfied
issue
involved
suit
proceeding
referable
arbitration
agreement
shall
application
one
parties
stay
trial
action
arbitration
accordance
terms
agreement
providing
applicant
stay
default
proceeding
arbitration
emphasis
added
party
aggrieved
alleged
failure
neglect
refusal
another
arbitrate
written
agreement
arbitration
may
petition
terminix
companies
dobson
district
save
agreement
jurisdiction
title
civil
action
admiralty
subject
matter
suit
arising
controversy
parties
order
directing
arbitration
proceed
manner
provided
agreement
shall
hear
parties
upon
satisfied
making
agreement
arbitration
failure
comply
therewith
issue
shall
make
order
directing
parties
proceed
arbitration
accordance
terms
agreement
emphasis
added
upon
petition
district
district
arbitrators
sitting
may
compel
attendance
person
punish
said
person
contempt
manner
provided
law
securing
attendance
witnesses
punishment
neglect
refusal
attend
courts
terminix
companies
dobson
despite
faa
general
focus
federal
courts
course
contains
explicit
limitation
text
statute
nonetheless
makes
clear
meant
statement
substantive
law
binding
really
understood
creat
federal
substantive
law
requiring
parties
honor
arbitration
agreements
southland
breach
arbitration
agreement
covered
give
rise
federal
question
within
jurisdiction
federal
district
courts
see
yet
ensuing
provisions
act
without
expressly
taking
away
jurisdiction
clearly
rest
assumption
federal
courts
jurisdiction
enforce
arbitration
agreements
jurisdiction
underlying
dispute
see
words
faa
treats
arbitration
simply
one
means
resolving
disputes
lie
within
jurisdiction
federal
courts
makes
clear
breach
covered
arbitration
agreement
provide
independent
basis
jurisdiction
even
southland
majority
forced
acknowledge
point
conceding
create
independent
jurisdiction
otherwise
reason
give
rise
jurisdiction
enacted
purely
procedural
provision
reason
applies
federal
courts
distinction
substance
procedure
acquired
new
meaning
erie
railroad
tompkins
thus
held
erie
purposes
question
whether
stay
litigation
brought
breach
arbitration
agreement
one
substantive
law
bernhardt
polygraphic
america
later
development
change
terminix
companies
dobson
original
meaning
statute
congress
enacted
although
bernhardt
classified
portions
faa
substantive
rather
procedural
mean
understood
congress
extended
faa
reach
beyond
federal
courts
justice
pointed
faa
original
meaning
southland
dissent
see
majority
offered
one
real
response
considered
purely
procedural
provision
majority
reasoned
congress
extended
contracts
rather
simply
maritime
transactions
contract
evidencing
transaction
involving
interstate
foreign
commerce
see
yet
congress
might
well
thought
even
called
upon
federal
courts
enforce
arbitration
agreements
every
single
case
came
federal
interest
unless
interstate
commerce
maritime
transactions
involved
conclusion
far
plausible
southland
idea
congress
viewed
statement
substantive
law
believed
created
jurisdiction
even
interstate
commerce
requirement
raises
uncertainty
original
meaning
statute
resolve
uncertainty
light
core
principles
federalism
congress
may
legislate
areas
traditionally
regulated
long
acting
within
powers
granted
constitution
assume
congress
exercise
power
lightly
gregory
ashcroft
extent
federal
statutes
ambiguous
read
displace
state
law
rather
must
absolutely
certain
congress
intended
displacement
give
preemptive
effect
federal
statute
enactment
substantive
arbitration
terminix
companies
dobson
statute
along
lines
envisioned
southland
displaced
enormous
body
state
law
outside
predispute
arbitration
agreements
either
wholly
unenforceable
least
subject
specific
performance
see
generally
note
williams
branning
mfg
detailed
listing
state
cases
far
absolutely
certain
congress
swept
aside
state
rules
quite
sure
suppose
however
first
aspect
southland
correct
requires
enforce
covered
arbitration
agreements
contrary
state
law
still
textual
basis
southland
suggestion
requires
enforce
agreements
remedy
specific
performance
forcing
parties
submit
arbitration
contract
surely
valid
irrevocable
enforceable
even
though
enforced
actions
damages
thus
eve
faa
enactment
described
executory
arbitration
agreements
valid
creating
perfect
obligation
federal
law
even
though
federal
courts
refused
order
specific
performance
see
red
cross
line
atlantic
fruit
sure
faa
require
federal
courts
specifically
enforce
arbitration
agreements
provisions
deal
respectively
potential
plaintiffs
terminix
companies
dobson
potential
defendants
underlying
dispute
holds
plaintiffs
promise
take
claims
straight
holds
defendants
promise
submit
arbitration
rather
making
party
sue
case
arisen
one
courts
relevant
upon
proper
motion
obliged
grant
stay
pending
arbitration
unless
contract
parties
evidenc
transaction
involving
interstate
commerce
see
bernhardt
holding
limited
arbitration
agreements
declares
valid
case
arose
courts
alabama
however
petitioners
forced
contend
imposes
precisely
obligation
courts
federal
state
imposes
solely
federal
courts
though
southland
supports
argument
simply
correct
superfluous
alabama
law
brings
issues
sharp
focus
citing
public
policy
grounds
reach
back
bozeman
gilbert
alabama
courts
declared
predispute
arbitration
agreements
void
see
wells
mobile
county
bd
realtors
separate
state
statute
also
includes
agreement
submit
controversy
arbitration
among
obligations
specifically
enforced
alabama
code
especially
light
gregory
ashcroft
presumption
even
applicable
naturally
read
alabama
rule
state
statute
statute
make
executory
arbitration
agreements
invalid
revocable
unenforceable
inclusion
obligation
render
personal
service
statutory
provision
means
employment
contracts
invalid
alabama
case
hand
statute
terminix
companies
dobson
appears
provide
adequate
ground
denial
petitioners
motion
stay
ii
rather
attempting
defend
southland
merits
petitioners
rely
chiefly
doctrine
stare
decisis
urging
us
adhere
mistaken
interpretation
faa
see
reply
brief
petitioners
view
doctrine
insufficient
save
southland
majority
ante
justice
ante
properly
focus
whether
overruling
southland
frustrate
legitimate
expectations
people
drafted
executed
contracts
belief
even
state
courts
strictly
enforce
arbitration
clauses
doubt
innumerable
contracts
containing
arbitration
clauses
written
since
arbitrable
disputes
might
yet
arise
large
proportion
contracts
contracts
might
well
written
differently
absence
southland
still
see
reason
think
costs
overruling
southland
unacceptably
high
certainly
reliance
interests
involved
cases
like
present
one
applicability
faa
within
contemplation
parties
time
contracting
many
cases
moreover
parties
simply
comply
arbitration
agreement
either
theory
live
promises
theory
arbitration
cheapest
best
way
resolving
dispute
fair
number
remaining
cases
party
seeking
enforce
arbitration
agreement
able
get
federal
faa
apply
even
access
federal
impossible
creates
independent
basis
jurisdiction
many
cases
arise
whose
law
largely
parallels
faa
alabama
mississippi
terminix
companies
dobson
nebraska
still
hold
executory
arbitration
agreements
unenforceable
though
refuse
enforce
particular
classes
agreements
see
strickland
federal
arbitration
act
interstate
commerce
requirement
left
state
arbitration
law
hofstra
rev
quoting
arizona
rumsey
justice
nonetheless
acquiesces
majority
judgment
special
justification
overrule
southland
ante
even
approach
necessity
preserv
ing
state
autonomy
state
courts
seems
sufficient
suppose
stare
decisis
really
require
us
abide
southland
holding
applies
doctrine
still
require
us
follow
southland
suggestion
requires
specific
enforcement
arbitration
agreements
covers
accord
precedential
weight
mere
dicta
latter
suggestion
wholly
unnecessary
decision
southland
arbitration
agreement
issue
valid
respect
particular
claims
dispute
clearly
subject
specific
performance
state
law
indeed
state
trial
already
compelled
arbitration
claims
raised
complaint
see
southland
cal
code
civ
proc
ann
west
accordingly
question
properly
southland
whether
separate
state
law
declaring
arbitration
agreement
void
applied
remaining
claims
see
discussing
cal
code
ann
west
said
perry
thomas
held
california
statute
observed
prior
case
see
merrill
lynch
pierce
fenner
smith
ware
made
certain
arbitration
terminix
companies
dobson
clauses
unenforceable
subsequently
reserved
judgment
extent
state
courts
must
enforce
arbitration
agreements
mechanisms
faa
prescribe
federal
courts
see
volt
information
sciences
board
trustees
leland
stanford
junior
cf
mcdermott
lloyds
underwriters
london
conclude
opinions
state
courts
necessarily
grant
stays
conflicting
litigation
compel
arbitration
compliance
faa
sections
short
never
actually
held
opposed
stating
implying
dicta
faa
requires
state
stay
lawsuits
brought
violation
arbitration
agreement
covered
believe
faa
imposes
obligation
state
courts
indeed
statute
wholly
inapplicable
courts
affirm
alabama
judgment
footnotes
terminix
companies
dobson
prevalent
view
arbitration
statutes
purely
procedural
conflict
reasoning
red
cross
line
atlantic
fruit
case
respects
undermines
southland
position
see
infra
part
without
analyzing
question
opinion
red
cross
line
assumed
threshold
validity
arbitration
agreement
like
validity
sorts
contracts
matter
substantive
law
see
actual
holding
remedies
available
enforce
valid
arbitration
agreement
involve
substantive
law
see
perfectly
consistent
customary
view
discussed
moreover
faa
text
clearly
reflects
congress
view
statute
enacted
purely
procedural
time
indeed
federal
courts
award
nominal
damages
breach
agreements
see
aktieselskabet
foderstof
kompagniet
rederiaktiebolaget
atlanten
aff
grounds
sub
nom
atlanten
munson
straits
dover
sdny
aff
page