heck
humphrey
argued
april
decided
june
petitioner
heck
direct
appeal
indiana
conviction
pending
filed
suit
seeking
damages
injunctive
relief
release
custody
claim
respondents
acting
color
state
law
engaged
unlawful
acts
led
arrest
conviction
federal
district
dismissed
action
without
prejudice
indiana
upheld
heck
conviction
sentence
two
petitions
federal
habeas
relief
rejected
appeals
affirmed
dismissal
complaint
approved
district
reasoning
plaintiff
federal
civil
rights
action
challenging
legality
conviction
victory
require
release
even
sought
relief
suit
must
classified
habeas
corpus
action
dismissed
plaintiff
failed
exhaust
state
remedies
held
order
recover
damages
allegedly
unconstitutional
conviction
imprisonment
harm
caused
actions
whose
unlawfulness
render
conviction
sentence
invalid
plaintiff
must
prove
conviction
sentence
reversed
direct
appeal
expunged
executive
order
declared
invalid
state
tribunal
authorized
make
determination
called
question
federal
issuance
writ
habeas
corpus
claim
damages
bearing
relationship
conviction
sentence
invalidated
cognizable
preiser
rodriguez
wolff
mcdonnell
distinguished
foregoing
conclusion
follows
upon
recognition
common
law
torts
provides
appropriate
page
ii
starting
point
inquiry
see
carey
piphus
tort
malicious
prosecution
provides
closest
analogy
claims
type
considered
requires
allegation
proof
termination
prior
criminal
proceeding
favor
accused
see
carpenter
nutter
long
concerned
judgments
final
consistent
disinclined
expand
opportunities
collateral
attack
criminal
convictions
see
parke
raley
although
issue
cases
therefore
exhaustion
state
remedies
dismissal
heck
action
correct
courts
found
damages
claims
challenged
legality
conviction
pp
affirmed
scalia
delivered
opinion
rehnquist
kennedy
thomas
ginsburg
joined
thomas
filed
concurring
opinion
souter
filed
opinion
concurring
judgment
blackmun
stevens
joined
heck
humphrey
justice
scalia
delivered
opinion
case
presents
question
whether
state
prisoner
may
challenge
constitutionality
conviction
suit
damages
petitioner
roy
heck
convicted
indiana
state
voluntary
manslaughter
killing
rickie
heck
wife
serving
sentence
indiana
prison
appeal
conviction
pending
petitioner
proceeding
pro
se
filed
suit
federal
district
naming
defendants
respondents
james
humphrey
robert
ewbank
dearborn
county
prosecutors
michael
krinoph
investigator
indiana
state
heck
humphrey
police
complaint
alleged
respondents
acting
color
state
law
engaged
unlawful
unreasonable
arbitrary
investigation
leading
petitioner
arrest
knowingly
destroyed
evidence
exculpatory
nature
proved
petitioner
innocence
caused
illegal
unlawful
voice
identification
procedure
used
petitioner
trial
app
complaint
sought
among
things
compensatory
punitive
monetary
damages
ask
injunctive
relief
petitioner
sought
release
custody
action
district
dismissed
action
without
prejudice
issues
raised
directly
implicate
legality
petitioner
confinement
petitioner
appeal
seventh
circuit
pending
indiana
upheld
conviction
sentence
direct
appeal
heck
state
ind
first
petition
writ
habeas
corpus
federal
district
dismissed
contained
unexhausted
claims
second
federal
habeas
petition
denied
denial
affirmed
seventh
circuit
seventh
circuit
reached
petitioner
appeal
dismissal
complaint
affirmed
judgment
approved
reasoning
district
regardless
relief
sought
plaintiff
federal
civil
rights
action
challenging
legality
conviction
case
heck
humphrey
state
obliged
release
even
sought
relief
suit
classified
application
habeas
corpus
plaintiff
must
exhaust
state
remedies
pain
dismissal
fails
heck
filed
petition
certiorari
granted
ii
case
lies
intersection
two
fertile
sources
federal
prisoner
litigation
civil
rights
act
rev
stat
amended
federal
habeas
corpus
statute
provide
access
federal
forum
claims
unconstitutional
treatment
hands
state
officials
differ
scope
operation
general
exhaustion
state
remedies
prerequisite
action
patsy
board
regents
emphasis
added
even
action
state
prisoner
federal
habeas
corpus
statute
contrast
requires
state
prisoners
first
seek
heck
humphrey
redress
state
forum
see
rose
lundy
preiser
rodriguez
considered
potential
overlap
two
provisions
held
habeas
corpus
exclusive
remedy
state
prisoner
challenges
fact
duration
confinement
seeks
immediate
speedier
release
even
though
claim
may
come
within
literal
terms
emphasize
preiser
create
exception
exhaustion
rule
merely
held
certain
claims
state
prisoners
cognizable
provision
must
brought
habeas
corpus
proceedings
contain
exhaustion
requirement
case
clearly
covered
holding
preiser
petitioner
seeks
immediate
speedier
release
monetary
damages
sought
obtained
fully
effective
relief
federal
habeas
corpus
proceedings
see
also
allen
mccurry
dictum
however
preiser
asserted
since
state
prisoner
seeking
damages
attacking
something
fact
length
confinement
seeking
something
immediate
speedy
release
damages
action
state
prisoner
brought
federal
without
requirement
prior
exhaustion
state
remedies
statement
may
true
however
establishing
heck
humphrey
basis
damages
claim
necessarily
demonstrates
invalidity
conviction
situation
claimant
said
attacking
fact
length
confinement
bringing
suit
within
dictum
preiser
congress
determined
habeas
corpus
appropriate
remedy
state
prisoners
attacking
validity
fact
length
confinement
specific
determination
must
override
general
terms
last
analysis
think
dicta
preiser
unreliable
unintelligible
guide
opinion
cause
address
carefully
consider
damages
question
us
today
addressing
question
respond
petitioner
contention
already
answered
wolff
mcdonnell
see
reply
brief
petitioner
first
wolff
answered
question
expressly
reserved
years
later
tower
glover
see
secondly
careful
reading
wolff
support
contention
like
preiser
wolff
involved
challenge
procedures
used
state
prison
officials
deprive
prisoners
credits
complaint
sought
restoration
credits
well
damages
deprivation
civil
rights
resulting
use
allegedly
unconstitutional
procedures
wolff
supra
said
holding
claim
credits
foreclosed
preiser
damages
claim
nonetheless
properly
district
required
determination
validity
procedures
employed
imposing
sanctions
including
loss
good
time
petitioner
contends
language
authorized
plaintiffs
wolff
recover
damages
measured
actual
loss
good
time
think
light
earlier
language
characterizing
claim
heck
humphrey
one
damages
deprivation
civil
rights
rather
damages
deprivation
credits
think
passage
recognized
claim
using
wrong
procedures
reaching
wrong
result
denying
credits
indication
opinion
reason
believe
using
wrong
procedures
necessarily
vitiated
denial
credits
thus
claim
issue
wolff
call
question
lawfulness
plaintiff
continuing
confinement
see
fulford
klein
adhered
en
banc
schwartz
preiser
puzzle
continued
frustrating
conflict
civil
rights
habeas
corpus
remedies
state
prisoners
depaul
thus
question
posed
damage
claims
call
question
lawfulness
conviction
confinement
remains
open
answer
question
correctly
see
need
abandon
seventh
circuit
courts
agreement
done
teaching
contains
exhaustion
requirement
beyond
congress
provided
patsy
issue
respect
monetary
damages
challenging
conviction
seems
us
exhaustion
rather
issue
respect
injunctive
relief
challenging
conviction
preiser
whether
claim
cognizable
conclude
repeatedly
noted
creates
species
tort
liability
memphis
community
school
dist
stachura
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
ver
centuries
common
law
torts
developed
set
rules
implement
principle
person
compensated
fairly
injuries
caused
violation
legal
rights
rules
defining
elements
heck
humphrey
damages
prerequisites
recovery
provide
appropriate
starting
point
inquiry
well
carey
piphus
thus
determine
whether
bar
present
suit
look
first
common
law
torts
cf
stachura
supra
one
element
must
alleged
proved
malicious
prosecution
action
termination
prior
criminal
proceeding
favor
accused
prosser
keeton
supra
carpenter
nutter
cal
requirement
avoids
parallel
litigation
issues
probable
cause
guilt
precludes
possibility
claimant
sic
succeeding
tort
action
convicted
underlying
criminal
prosecution
contravention
strong
judicial
policy
creation
two
conflicting
resolutions
arising
identical
transaction
speiser
krause
gans
american
law
torts
furthermore
permit
convicted
criminal
defendant
heck
humphrey
proceed
malicious
prosecution
claim
permit
collateral
attack
conviction
vehicle
civil
suit
ibid
long
expressed
heck
humphrey
similar
concerns
finality
consistency
generally
declined
expand
opportunities
collateral
attack
see
parke
raley
teague
lane
rooker
fidelity
trust
voorhees
jackson
pet
think
hoary
principle
civil
tort
actions
appropriate
vehicles
challenging
validity
outstanding
criminal
judgments
applies
damages
actions
necessarily
require
plaintiff
prove
unlawfulness
conviction
confinement
always
applied
actions
malicious
prosecution
heck
humphrey
hold
order
recover
damages
allegedly
unconstitutional
conviction
imprisonment
harm
caused
actions
whose
unlawfulness
render
conviction
sentence
invalid
plaintiff
must
prove
conviction
sentence
reversed
direct
appeal
expunged
executive
order
declared
invalid
state
tribunal
authorized
make
determination
called
question
federal
issuance
writ
habeas
corpus
claim
damages
bearing
relationship
conviction
sentence
invalidated
cognizable
thus
state
prisoner
seeks
damages
suit
district
must
consider
whether
judgment
favor
plaintiff
necessarily
imply
invalidity
conviction
sentence
complaint
must
dismissed
unless
plaintiff
demonstrate
conviction
sentence
already
invalidated
district
determines
plaintiff
action
even
successful
demonstrate
heck
humphrey
invalidity
outstanding
criminal
judgment
plaintiff
action
allowed
proceed
absence
bar
suit
respondents
urged
us
adopt
rule
one
respect
broader
exhaustion
state
remedies
required
contended
success
damages
suit
necessarily
show
conviction
sentence
unlawful
whenever
judgment
action
resolve
necessary
element
likely
challenge
conviction
even
need
determine
conviction
invalid
brief
respondent
broad
sweep
needed
respondents
contended
lest
judgment
prisoner
favor
heck
humphrey
damage
action
claiming
example
fourth
amendment
violation
given
preclusive
effect
subsequent
state
postconviction
proceeding
preclusion
might
result
asserted
state
exercised
sufficient
control
officials
defense
action
see
montana
occasion
rule
matter
time
least
plain
preclusion
necessarily
automatic
even
permissible
effect
another
respect
however
holding
sweeps
broadly
approach
respondents
urged
engraft
exhaustion
requirement
upon
rather
deny
existence
cause
action
even
heck
humphrey
prisoner
fully
exhausted
available
state
remedies
cause
action
unless
conviction
sentence
reversed
expunged
invalidated
impugned
grant
writ
habeas
corpus
makes
unnecessary
us
address
statute
limitations
issue
wrestled
appeals
concluded
federal
doctrine
equitable
tolling
apply
cause
action
state
challenges
conviction
sentence
exhausted
distinguished
cases
holding
state
federal
tolling
provisions
apply
actions
see
board
regents
univ
tomanio
hardin
straub
ground
petitioner
claim
part
one
habeas
corpus
analysis
statute
limitations
poses
difficulty
state
challenges
pursued
since
claim
yet
arisen
cause
action
malicious
prosecution
accrue
criminal
proceedings
terminated
plaintiff
favor
corman
limitation
actions
carnes
atkins
la
also
cause
action
damages
attributable
unconstitutional
conviction
sentence
accrue
conviction
sentence
invalidated
heck
humphrey
applying
principles
present
action
courts
found
damage
claims
challenged
legality
conviction
find
dismissal
action
correct
judgment
appeals
seventh
circuit
affirmed
footnotes
neither
petition
certiorari
principal
brief
merits
petitioner
contest
description
monetary
claims
district
appeals
challenging
legality
conviction
thus
question
understood
us
whether
money
damages
premised
unlawful
conviction
pursued
petitioner
sought
challenge
premise
reply
brief
contending
heck
humphrey
findings
validating
damages
claims
invalidate
conviction
see
reply
brief
petitioner
argument
comes
late
take
case
review
issue
accept
characterization
lower
courts
also
decline
pursue
without
implying
nonexistence
another
issue
suggested
appeals
statement
petitioner
conviction
proper
suit
likelihood
barred
res
judicata
res
judicata
effect
state
decisions
actions
matter
state
law
see
migra
warren
city
school
dist
bd
title
provides
application
writ
habeas
corpus
behalf
person
custody
pursuant
judgment
state
shall
granted
unless
appears
applicant
exhausted
remedies
available
courts
state
either
absence
available
state
corrective
process
existence
circumstances
rendering
process
ineffective
protect
rights
prisoner
justice
souter
criticizes
reliance
malicious
prosecution
favorable
termination
requirement
illustrative
common
law
principle
barring
tort
plaintiffs
mounting
collateral
attacks
outstanding
criminal
convictions
malicious
prosecution
inapt
analogy
says
defendant
conviction
reconstruction
era
common
law
dissolved
claim
malicious
prosecution
conviction
regarded
irrebuttable
evidence
prosecution
never
lacked
probable
cause
post
citing
cooley
law
torts
chief
justice
cooley
doubt
intended
merely
set
forth
general
rule
conviction
defeated
malicious
prosecution
plaintiff
allegation
essential
cause
action
prior
proceeding
without
probable
cause
absolute
rule
jurisdictions
see
goodrich
warner
richter
koster
ind
early
recognized
must
exceptions
rule
cases
involving
circumstances
fraud
perjury
mistake
law
see
burt
place
wend
witham
gowen
olson
neal
iowa
cases
even
held
conviction
although
afterwards
reversed
prima
facie
evidence
existence
probable
cause
neher
dobbs
neb
collecting
cases
crescent
city
live
stock
butchers
union
recognized
ow
much
weight
proof
probable
cause
shall
attributed
judgment
original
action
subsequently
reversed
error
may
admit
question
attempted
reconcile
apparent
contradiction
authorities
observing
presumption
probable
cause
arising
conviction
rebutted
showing
conviction
obtained
type
fraud
ibid
although
ultimately
held
malicious
prosecution
defendant
discussion
case
well
establishes
absolute
rule
justice
souter
contends
exist
yet
even
justice
souter
correct
asserting
prior
conviction
although
reversed
dissolved
claim
malicious
prosecution
post
analysis
unaffected
simply
demonstrate
common
law
action
even
malicious
heck
humphrey
prosecution
permit
criminal
proceeding
impugned
tort
action
even
conviction
reversed
anything
strengthen
belief
borrowed
general
tort
principles
meant
permit
collateral
attack
justice
souter
discussion
abuse
process
post
undermine
principle
true
favorable
termination
prior
proceedings
element
cause
action
neither
impugning
proceedings
one
consequences
gravamen
tort
wrongfulness
prosecution
extortionate
perversion
lawfully
initiated
process
illegitimate
ends
see
donohoe
const
mount
vernon
see
also
speiser
krause
gans
american
law
torts
cognizable
injury
abuse
process
limited
harm
caused
misuse
process
include
harm
conviction
confinement
resulting
process
carried
lawful
conclusion
thus
one
seek
compensatory
damages
outstanding
criminal
conviction
action
abuse
process
one
malicious
prosecution
limitation
illustrated
mcgann
allen
held
expenses
incurred
plaintiff
defending
crimes
charged
compensable
suit
abuse
process
since
amage
abuse
process
must
confined
damage
flowing
heck
humphrey
abuse
confined
period
time
involved
taking
plaintiff
arrest
defendant
store
detention
example
latter
category
action
seek
damages
directly
attributable
conviction
confinement
whose
successful
prosecution
necessarily
imply
plaintiff
criminal
conviction
wrongful
following
state
defendant
convicted
sentenced
crime
resisting
arrest
defined
intentionally
preventing
peace
officer
effecting
lawful
arrest
common
definition
offense
see
people
peacock
torcia
wharton
criminal
law
ed
brings
action
arresting
officer
seeking
damages
violation
fourth
amendment
right
free
unreasonable
seizures
order
prevail
action
negate
element
offense
convicted
regardless
state
law
concerning
res
judicata
see
supra
action
lie
example
suit
damages
attributable
allegedly
unreasonable
search
may
lie
even
challenged
search
produced
evidence
introduced
state
criminal
trial
resulting
plaintiff
conviction
doctrines
like
independent
source
inevitable
discovery
see
murray
especially
harmless
error
see
arizona
fulminante
action
even
successful
necessarily
imply
plaintiff
conviction
unlawful
order
recover
compensatory
damages
however
plaintiff
must
prove
search
unlawful
caused
actual
compensable
injury
see
memphis
community
school
dist
stachura
hold
today
encompass
injury
convicted
imprisoned
conviction
overturned
example
state
criminal
defendant
brings
federal
civil
rights
lawsuit
pendency
criminal
trial
appeal
state
habeas
action
abstention
may
appropriate
response
parallel
state
proceedings
see
colorado
river
water
conservation
dist
moreover
decide
whether
abstention
might
appropriate
cases
state
prisoner
brings
damages
suit
raising
issue
also
grounds
relief
state
challenge
conviction
sentence
cf
tower
glover
state
courts
bound
apply
federal
rules
determining
preclusive
effect
federal
decisions
issues
federal
law
see
bator
meltzer
mishkin
shapiro
hart
wechsler
federal
courts
federal
system
ed
clear
federal
decided
federal
question
federal
res
judicata
rules
govern
deposit
bank
frankfort
stoll
gottlieb
federal
rules
subject
issue
claim
preclusion
unlike
relating
exhaustion
state
remedies
almost
entirely
hart
wechsler
supra
see
also
burbank
interjurisdictional
preclusion
full
faith
credit
federal
common
law
general
approach
cornell
developing
courts
indeed
guided
federal
policies
reflected
congressional
enactments
cf
moragne
marine
lines
see
also
mendoza
recognizing
exception
general
principles
res
judicata
light
overriding
federal
policy
concerns
thus
preclusion
rules
may
judicial
application
categorical
mandate
may
see
patsy
board
regents
take
account
policy
embodied
exhaustion
requirement
see
rose
lundy
state
courts
given
first
opportunity
review
constitutional
claims
bearing
upon
state
prisoners
release
custody
justice
souter
also
adopts
common
law
principle
one
use
device
civil
tort
action
challenge
validity
outstanding
criminal
conviction
thinks
necessary
abandon
principle
cases
real
life
example
comes
mind
involving
former
state
prisoners
longer
custody
bring
challenges
post
think
principle
barring
collateral
attacks
longstanding
deeply
rooted
feature
common
law
jurisprudence
rendered
inapplicable
fortuity
convicted
criminal
longer
incarcerated
justice
souter
opines
disallowing
damages
suit
former
state
prisoner
heck
humphrey
framed
ku
klux
state
officials
hard
indeed
reconcile
purpose
justice
souter
appears
suggest
goal
interpretive
enterprise
provide
remedy
conceivable
invasions
federal
rights
freedmen
may
suffered
hands
officials
former
confederacy
entire
landscape
jurisprudence
look
different
example
adopted
rule
judicial
officers
absolute
immunity
liability
damages
pierson
ray
rule
prevent
recovery
former
slave
tried
convicted
corrupt
state
judge
league
ku
klux
klan
heck
humphrey
justice
thomas
concurring
justice
souter
correctly
begin
analyses
realization
case
lies
intersection
civil
rights
act
amended
federal
habeas
corpus
statute
ante
post
one
need
read
respective
opinions
case
understand
difficulty
task
today
justice
souter
embark
similar
enterprise
harmonizing
broad
language
general
statute
specific
federal
habeas
corpus
statute
preiser
rodriguez
write
separately
note
put
habeas
statute
justice
souter
appropriately
terms
collision
course
post
long
recognized
expanded
prerogative
writ
habeas
corpus
far
beyond
limited
scope
either
originally
intended
wright
west
opinion
thomas
habeas
golden
state
transit
los
angeles
kennedy
dissenting
expanding
two
historic
statutes
brought
squarely
conflict
context
suits
state
prisoners
made
clear
preiser
heck
humphrey
given
created
tension
two
statutes
proper
devise
limitations
aimed
ameliorating
conflict
provided
principled
fashion
cf
malley
briggs
today
limits
scope
manner
consistent
federalism
concerns
undergirding
explicit
exhaustion
requirement
habeas
statute
post
state
common
law
time
enacted
ante
join
opinion
heck
humphrey
justice
souter
justice
blackmun
justice
stevens
justice
join
concurring
judgment
begins
analysis
observing
case
lies
intersection
two
fertile
sources
federal
prisoner
litigation
civil
rights
act
federal
habeas
corpus
statute
two
statutes
provide
access
federal
forum
claims
unconstitutional
treatment
hands
state
officials
differ
ing
scope
operation
ante
instead
analyzing
statutes
determine
yield
intersection
appears
take
position
statutes
never
collision
course
first
place
like
common
law
tort
malicious
prosecution
requires
presumably
always
required
plaintiffs
seeking
damages
unconstitutional
conviction
confinement
show
favorable
termination
underlying
proceeding
see
ante
object
referring
common
law
resolving
question
case
presents
think
existence
tort
malicious
prosecution
alone
provides
answer
common
law
tort
rules
provide
starting
point
inquiry
heck
humphrey
carey
piphus
relied
common
law
cases
thought
consistent
ordinary
rules
statutory
construction
common
law
principles
textual
support
provisions
civil
rights
act
see
damages
principles
fundamental
widely
understood
time
enacted
congress
presumed
abrogated
silently
see
tenney
brandhove
immunity
pierson
ray
time
consistently
refused
allow
common
law
analogies
displace
statutory
analysis
declining
import
even
well
settled
common
law
rules
statute
history
purpose
counsel
applying
rules
actions
wyatt
cole
see
also
tower
glover
cf
anderson
creighton
never
suggested
precise
contours
official
immunity
slavishly
derived
often
arcane
rules
common
law
heck
humphrey
examination
common
law
sources
arguably
relevant
case
confirms
soundness
hierarchy
principles
resolving
questions
concerning
common
law
merely
starting
point
analysis
destination
unless
authority
choose
common
law
requirements
like
discard
others
principle
compel
us
accept
elements
cause
action
malicious
prosecution
tort
favorable
termination
requirement
elements
tort
coherently
transplanted
addition
proving
favorable
termination
plaintiff
malicious
prosecution
action
according
sources
relies
upon
must
prove
bsence
probable
cause
proceeding
well
alice
primary
purpose
bringing
offender
justice
keeton
dobbs
keeton
owen
prosser
keeton
law
torts
ed
see
also
speiser
krause
gans
american
law
torts
requirements
however
elements
mean
even
plaintiff
whose
conviction
invalidated
heck
humphrey
unconstitutional
premised
example
confession
coerced
interrogation
room
beating
obtain
damages
unconstitutional
conviction
ensuing
confinement
defendant
police
officials
perhaps
prosecutor
probable
cause
believe
plaintiff
guilty
intended
bring
justice
absent
independent
statutory
basis
importing
malicious
prosecution
tort
favorable
termination
requirement
probable
cause
requirement
particularly
odd
since
latter
former
derives
see
prosser
keeton
supra
requirement
criminal
prosecution
terminate
favor
malicious
prosecution
plaintiff
primarily
important
independent
element
malicious
prosecution
action
shows
probable
cause
guilt
fact
bigelow
leading
cases
law
torts
action
malicious
prosecution
maintained
prosecution
terminated
otherwise
plaintiff
might
obtain
judgment
one
case
yet
convicted
course
disprove
averment
want
probable
cause
addition
common
law
master
statutory
analysis
servant
switch
metaphors
find
two
masters
contend
subject
tort
malicious
prosecution
tort
abuse
process
well
see
wyatt
cole
supra
slip
calling
two
actions
closely
analogous
torts
latter
making
unnecessary
plaintiff
prove
proceeding
terminated
favor
prosser
keeton
supra
suggests
tort
malicious
prosecution
provides
closest
analogy
claims
type
considered
permits
damages
confinement
imposed
pursuant
legal
process
ante
heck
humphrey
appears
true
tort
abuse
process
see
restatement
second
torts
illustration
indicating
person
causing
issue
writ
capias
someone
lent
money
caused
borrower
arrested
kept
prison
properly
held
liable
arrest
imprisonment
lender
purpose
using
legal
process
wrongful
regardless
favorable
termination
want
probable
cause
furthermore
even
tort
malicious
prosecution
today
marginally
analogous
torts
type
claim
class
cases
us
alone
may
permit
damages
unlawful
conviction
postconviction
confinement
see
infra
overlooks
significant
historical
incongruity
calls
question
utility
analogy
tort
malicious
prosecution
insofar
used
exclusively
determine
scope
damages
sought
type
claim
involved
damages
unlawful
conviction
postconviction
confinement
available
action
malicious
prosecution
time
enactment
defendant
conviction
reconstruction
era
common
heck
humphrey
law
dissolved
claim
malicious
prosecution
conviction
regarded
irrebuttable
evidence
prosecution
never
lacked
probable
cause
see
cooley
law
torts
defendant
convicted
first
instance
appeals
acquitted
appellate
conviction
conclusive
probable
cause
thus
definition
favorable
termination
framers
aware
aware
definition
included
none
events
relevant
type
claim
involved
case
revers
al
direct
appeal
expunge
ment
executive
order
declar
ation
invalid
ity
state
tribunal
authorized
make
determination
call
ing
question
federal
issuance
writ
habeas
corpus
ante
easy
see
analogy
tort
malicious
prosecution
context
escaped
collective
wisdom
many
courts
commentators
previously
addressed
issue
well
parties
case
indeed
relying
tort
malicious
prosecution
dictate
outcome
case
logically
drive
one
position
untenable
matter
statutory
interpretation
clear
disclaimed
conviction
crime
wipes
person
claim
damages
unconstitutional
conviction
confinement
heck
humphrey
however
strait
enquiry
case
may
follow
interpretive
methodology
employed
preiser
rodriguez
methodology
uniformly
applied
courts
appeals
analyzing
analogous
cases
see
young
kenny
preiser
read
general
statute
light
specific
federal
habeas
corpus
statute
applies
person
custody
habeas
statute
policy
embodied
exhaustion
requirement
state
courts
given
first
opportunity
review
constitutional
claims
bearing
upon
state
prisoner
release
custody
though
contrast
preiser
state
prisoner
seeks
damages
release
custody
distinction
makes
difference
damages
sought
unconstitutional
conviction
confinement
explains
nothing
preiser
wolff
mcdonnell
properly
read
holding
relief
sought
action
dictates
whether
state
prisoner
proceed
immediately
federal
see
heck
humphrey
ante
whether
federal
damages
judgment
state
officials
action
preclusive
effect
later
litigation
state
mounting
damages
defendant
officials
unlawful
confinement
damages
almost
certainly
paid
state
indemnification
practically
compel
state
release
prisoner
allowing
state
prisoner
proceed
directly
federal
attack
conviction
sentence
wholly
frustrate
explicit
congressional
intent
declared
habeas
exhaustion
requirement
preiser
statutory
scheme
must
read
precluding
attacks
conclusion
flows
preference
habeas
statutes
written
recognition
congress
determined
habeas
corpus
appropriate
remedy
state
prisoners
attacking
validity
fact
length
confinement
specific
determination
must
override
general
terms
leaves
question
implement
statutory
analysis
requires
point
malicious
prosecution
tort
favorable
termination
requirement
becomes
helpful
dictating
elements
cause
action
suggesting
relatively
simple
way
avoid
collisions
intersection
habeas
state
prisoner
may
seek
federal
damages
unconstitutional
conviction
confinement
previously
established
unlawfulness
conviction
confinement
appeal
habeas
effect
requiring
state
prisoner
challenging
lawfulness
confinement
follow
habeas
rules
seeking
damages
unlawful
confinement
federal
ultimately
holding
today
neatly
resolves
problem
bedeviled
lower
courts
see
decision
heck
humphrey
young
kenny
supra
discussing
cases
legal
commentators
see
schwartz
preiser
puzzle
depaul
listing
articles
law
students
doubtless
run
case
like
law
school
exams
favorable
termination
requirement
avoids
knotty
statute
limitations
problem
arises
federal
courts
dismiss
suits
filed
inmate
pursues
federal
habeas
statute
limitations
clock
start
ticking
inmate
conviction
set
aside
without
requiring
federal
courts
stay
therefore
retain
dockets
prematurely
filed
suits
see
ante
heck
humphrey
may
analysis
takes
thus
go
objection
may
opinion
style
substance
acknowledges
habeas
exhaustion
requirement
explains
reason
habeas
statute
intersect
case
require
exhaustion
see
ante
describes
issue
faces
preiser
ante
recites
principle
common
law
tort
rules
provide
appropriate
starting
point
inquiry
ante
quoting
carey
piphus
transpose
onto
elements
malicious
prosecution
tort
incompatible
policies
habeas
statute
relevant
claims
state
prisoners
opinion
read
saying
nothing
enactment
habeas
statute
prison
inmates
seeking
damages
federal
unconstitutional
conviction
confinement
must
satisfy
requirement
analogous
malicious
prosecution
tort
favorable
termination
requirement
cf
ante
thomas
concurring
sensible
way
read
opinion
part
alternative
needlessly
place
risk
rights
outside
intersection
habeas
statute
individuals
custody
habeas
purposes
individuals
people
merely
fined
example
completed
short
terms
imprisonment
probation
parole
discover
fault
constitutional
violation
full
expiration
sentences
like
state
prisoners
required
show
prior
invalidation
convictions
sentences
order
obtain
damages
unconstitutional
conviction
imprisonment
result
deny
federal
forum
claiming
deprivation
federal
rights
first
obtain
favorable
state
ruling
heck
humphrey
reason
course
individuals
custody
invoke
federal
habeas
jurisdiction
statutory
mechanism
besides
individuals
may
sue
state
officials
federal
violating
federal
rights
untoward
result
one
thing
adopt
rule
forces
prison
inmates
follow
federal
habeas
route
claims
fall
within
plain
language
necessary
prevent
requirement
habeas
statute
undermined
preiser
rodriguez
rule
state
prisoners
harmonizing
habeas
statute
requiring
state
prisoner
seeking
damages
unconstitutional
conviction
establish
previous
invalidation
conviction
run
afoul
called
repeatedly
purpose
interpose
federal
courts
people
guardians
people
federal
rights
mitchum
foster
see
also
pulliam
allen
patsy
board
regents
florida
prisoner
caught
intersection
habeas
statute
still
attack
lawfulness
conviction
confinement
heard
federal
albeit
one
sitting
habeas
depending
circumstances
may
able
obtain
damages
entirely
different
matter
however
shut
federal
courts
altogether
claims
fall
within
plain
language
rrespective
common
law
support
general
rule
disfavoring
collateral
attacks
lacks
authority
thing
absent
unambiguous
congressional
direction
reading
exclude
claims
federal
run
counter
history
defeat
statute
purpose
wyatt
cole
heck
humphrey
consider
case
former
slave
framed
ku
klux
law
enforcement
officers
convicted
state
example
raping
white
woman
suppose
unjustly
convicted
defendant
discover
proof
unconstitutionally
release
state
custody
correct
say
independently
requires
person
custody
establish
prior
invalidation
conviction
equally
right
tell
former
slave
seek
federal
relief
even
law
enforcement
officers
framed
unless
first
managed
convince
state
courts
conviction
unlawful
result
hard
indeed
reconcile
either
purpose
origins
popularly
known
ku
klux
act
collins
hardyman
statute
enacted
part
concern
many
state
courts
league
bent
upon
abrogation
federally
protected
rights
mitchum
foster
cf
cong
globe
trumbull
explaining
civil
rights
act
federal
government
right
set
aside
action
state
authorities
deprives
person
fourteenth
amendment
rights
also
result
unjustified
habeas
statute
enactment
see
policy
reflected
congressional
enactment
justify
denying
individual
today
federal
damages
significantly
less
disruptive
remedy
order
compelling
release
custody
merely
unconstitutionally
fined
state
person
discovers
release
prison
example
state
officials
deliberately
withheld
exculpatory
material
absent
statutory
policy
surely
common
law
give
us
heck
humphrey
authority
narrow
broad
language
speaks
deprivations
constitutional
rights
privileges
immunities
person
acting
color
state
law
given
full
effect
recognizing
provide
remedy
broadly
construed
forms
official
violation
federally
protected
rights
dennis
higgins
quoting
monell
new
york
city
dept
social
services
sum
malicious
prosecution
analogy
provides
useful
mechanism
implementing
statutory
analysis
requires
congressional
policy
reflected
enacted
statutes
must
ultimately
guide
thus
clear
proper
resolution
case
involving
course
state
prisoner
construe
light
habeas
statute
explicit
policy
exhaustion
cast
doubt
ability
individual
unaffected
habeas
statute
take
advantage
broad
reach
recent
opinion
wyatt
cole
summarized
manner
analyzed
relationship
common
law
context
immunity
section
creates
species
tort
liability
face
admits
immunities
imbler
pachtman
nonetheless
accorded
certain
government
officials
either
absolute
qualified
immunity
suit
tradition
immunity
firmly
rooted
common
law
supported
strong
policy
reasons
congress
specifically
provided
wished
abolish
doctrine
owen
city
independence
quoting
pierson
ray
parties
seeking
immunity
shielded
tort
liability
congress
enacted
civil
rights
act
heck
humphrey
codified
infer
legislative
silence
congress
intend
abrogate
immunities
imposed
liability
actions
taken
color
state
law
see
tower
glover
imbler
supra
pulliam
allen
additionally
irrespective
common
law
support
recognize
immunity
available
common
law
history
purpose
counsel
applying
actions
tower
supra
see
also
imbler
supra
concurrence
justice
kennedy
stated
must
remembered
unlike
common
law
judges
whose
doctrines
adopt
devising
limitations
remedial
statute
enacted
congress
face
provide
immunities
quoting
malley
briggs
emphasis
added
malley
observes
differences
tort
abuse
process
malicious
prosecution
ante
gist
tort
malicious
prosecution
commencing
action
causing
process
issue
without
justification
abuse
process
involves
misusing
misapplying
process
justified
end
designed
accomplish
prosser
keeton
supra
neither
common
law
tort
however
precisely
matches
statutory
claim
damages
unlawful
conviction
confinement
depending
nature
underlying
right
alleged
violated
consider
example
right
selected
prosecution
solely
one
race
tort
abuse
process
might
provide
better
analogy
claim
unconstitutional
conviction
confinement
malicious
prosecution
tort
traditional
common
law
requirements
appear
liberalized
years
see
prosser
keeton
supra
considerable
minority
view
regards
conviction
creating
presumption
may
rebutted
competent
evidence
showing
probable
cause
prosecution
fact
exist
strengthening
analogy
draws
surely
view
single
tort
late
form
conclusively
retroactively
dictate
requirements
statute
discrete
category
cases
defending
historical
analogy
suggests
chief
justice
cooley
mean
clearly
heck
humphrey
said
despite
cooley
treatise
reconstruction
era
common
law
recognized
limited
exception
rule
denying
malicious
prosecution
plaintiff
benefit
invalidation
conviction
exception
convictions
obtained
type
fraud
ante
citing
crescent
live
stock
butchers
union
even
narrow
exception
existed
however
tort
malicious
prosecution
stood
century
still
make
weak
analogy
statutory
action
even
accepts
defendants
whose
convictions
reversed
violating
righ
secured
constitution
may
obtain
damages
unlawful
confinement
associated
conviction
assuming
course
immunity
bar
course
existence
exception
explain
one
element
malicious
prosecution
action
may
imported
others
requirement
state
prisoner
seeking
damages
unlawful
conviction
confinement
successful
state
federal
habeas
strikes
soundly
rooted
statutory
scheme
congress
determined
habeas
corpus
appropriate
remedy
state
prisoners
attacking
validity
fact
length
confinement
specific
determination
override
general
terms
preiser
rodriguez
state
prisoner
whose
constitutional
attacks
confinement
rejected
state
courts
said
unlawfully
confined
unless
federal
habeas
declares
custody
violation
constitution
laws
treaties
unsuccessful
federal
habeas
petitioner
therefore
consistently
habeas
statute
receive
damages
unlawful
confinement
say
however
state
prisoner
whose
request
release
rejected
state
courts
federal
habeas
necessarily
barred
seeking
damages
violations
constitutional
rights
judgment
favor
demonstrate
invalidity
confinement
outside
habeas
statute
may
seek
damages
constitutional
violation
even
without
showing
favorable
termination
state
prisoner
may
example
seek
damages
unreasonable
search
produced
evidence
lawfully
harmlessly
admitted
trial
even
nominal
damages
say
violation
right
procedural
due
process
see
carey
piphus
see
ante
page