shepard
argued
november
decided
march
petitioner
shepard
pleaded
guilty
felon
possession
firearm
violation
government
sought
increase
sentence
maximum
minimum
popularly
known
armed
career
criminal
act
acca
mandates
felons
three
prior
convictions
violent
felonies
drug
offenses
shepard
predicate
felonies
massachusetts
burglary
convictions
entered
upon
guilty
pleas
held
generic
burglary
meaning
among
things
committed
building
enclosed
space
violent
crime
acca
taylor
sentencing
acca
look
statutory
elements
charging
documents
jury
instructions
determine
whether
earlier
conviction
jury
trial
generic
burglary
like
massachusetts
broader
burglary
definitions
refusing
consider
minimum
district
found
taylor
investigation
show
shepard
three
generic
burglary
convictions
rejected
government
argument
examine
police
reports
complaint
applications
determining
whether
shepard
guilty
pleas
admitted
supported
generic
burglary
convictions
first
circuit
vacated
ruling
reports
applications
considered
remand
district
declined
impose
enhanced
sentence
first
circuit
vacated
held
judgment
reversed
case
remanded
reversed
remanded
justice
souter
delivered
opinion
except
part
iii
concluding
enquiry
acca
determine
whether
guilty
plea
burglary
nongeneric
statute
necessarily
admitted
elements
generic
offense
limited
terms
charging
document
terms
plea
agreement
transcript
colloquy
judge
defendant
defendant
confirmed
factual
basis
plea
comparable
judicial
record
information
guilty
pleas
may
establish
acca
predicate
offenses
taylor
reasoning
controls
identification
generic
convictions
following
pleas
well
convictions
verdicts
nongeneric
offenses
acca
nowhere
provides
convictions
tried
pleaded
cases
regarded
differently
nothing
taylor
rationale
limits
prior
jury
convictions
must
find
right
analogs
applying
taylor
pleaded
cases
taylor
drew
pragmatic
conclusion
best
way
identify
generic
convictions
jury
cases
cases
tried
without
jury
closest
analogs
jury
instructions
judge
formal
ruling
law
finding
fact
pleaded
cases
statement
factual
basis
charge
shown
transcript
plea
colloquy
written
plea
agreement
presented
record
comparable
findings
fact
adopted
defendant
upon
entering
plea
later
generally
tell
material
whether
prior
plea
necessarily
rested
fact
identifying
burglary
generic
taylor
supra
government
arguments
wider
evidentiary
cast
includes
documents
submitted
lower
courts
even
prior
charges
amount
call
ease
away
taylor
conclusion
respect
congressional
intent
avoidance
collateral
trials
require
confining
generic
conviction
evidence
convicting
records
approaching
certainty
record
conviction
generic
crime
state
heart
taylor
decision
justification
upsetting
precedent
dealing
statutory
interpretation
congress
nearly
years
since
taylor
taken
action
modify
statute
pp
justice
souter
joined
justice
stevens
justice
scalia
justice
ginsburg
concluded
part
iii
rule
jones
apprendi
new
jersey
line
cases
fact
prior
conviction
sufficient
raise
limit
possible
federal
sentence
must
found
jury
absent
waiver
defendant
also
relevant
acca
sentencing
nongeneric
state
fact
necessary
show
generic
crime
established
record
conviction
generic
state
judicial
finding
disputed
prior
conviction
made
authority
instead
sentencing
judge
considering
acca
enhancement
government
view
make
disputed
finding
fact
defendant
state
judge
must
understood
prior
plea
factual
basis
dispute
raises
concern
underlying
jones
apprendi
sixth
fourteenth
amendments
guarantee
jury
standing
defendant
power
state
guarantee
jury
finding
disputed
fact
essential
increase
potential
sentence
ceiling
disputed
fact
far
removed
conclusive
significance
prior
judicial
record
much
like
findings
subject
jones
apprendi
say
clearly
authorizes
judge
resolve
dispute
rule
reading
statutes
avoid
serious
risks
unconstitutionality
therefore
counsels
limit
scope
judicial
factfinding
disputed
generic
character
prior
plea
pp
justice
thomas
agreed
broaden
scope
evidence
judges
may
consider
taylor
give
rise
constitutional
error
constitutional
doubt
taylor
permit
judicial
factfinding
concerns
prior
convictions
eroded
subsequent
sixth
amendment
jurisprudence
pp
souter
delivered
opinion
except
part
iii
stevens
scalia
ginsburg
joined
opinion
full
thomas
joined
except
part
iii
thomas
filed
opinion
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
filed
dissenting
opinion
kennedy
breyer
joined
rehnquist
took
part
decision
case
reginald
shepard
petitioner
writ
certiorari
appeals
first
circuit
march
justice
souter
delivered
opinion
except
part
iii
title
ed
supp
ii
popularly
known
armed
career
criminal
act
acca
mandates
minimum
prison
sentence
anyone
possessing
firearm
three
prior
convictions
serious
drug
offenses
violent
felonies
act
makes
burglary
violent
felony
committed
building
enclosed
space
generic
burglary
boat
motor
vehicle
taylor
held
sentencing
acca
look
statutory
elements
charging
documents
jury
instructions
determine
whether
earlier
conviction
trial
generic
burglary
question
whether
sentencing
look
police
reports
complaint
applications
determine
whether
earlier
guilty
plea
necessarily
admitted
supported
conviction
generic
burglary
hold
may
later
determining
character
ted
burglary
generally
limited
examining
statutory
definition
charging
document
written
plea
agreement
transcript
plea
colloquy
explicit
factual
finding
trial
judge
defendant
assented
petitioner
reginald
shepard
indicted
barring
felons
possessing
firearm
pleaded
guilty
sentencing
government
claimed
shepard
prior
convictions
raised
sentencing
range
months
sentencing
guidelines
minimum
required
pointing
four
prior
convictions
entered
upon
shepard
pleas
guilty
one
massachusetts
two
burglary
whereas
government
said
conviction
represented
predicate
acca
offense
generic
burglary
district
ruled
taylor
barred
counting
prior
convictions
predicates
mandatory
minimum
supp
mass
taylor
read
listing
burglary
predicate
violent
felony
acca
refer
called
generic
burglary
unlawful
unprivileged
entry
remaining
building
structure
intent
commit
crime
statutes
like
massachusetts
define
burglary
broadly
extending
entries
boats
cars
consider
later
sentencing
acca
might
tell
whether
prior
burglary
conviction
generic
held
acca
generally
prohibits
later
delving
particular
facts
disclosed
record
conviction
thus
leaving
normally
look
fact
conviction
statutory
definition
prior
offense
recognized
exception
categorical
approach
narrow
range
cases
jury
state
broader
definition
burglary
actually
required
find
elements
generic
offense
ibid
held
exception
applicable
indictment
information
jury
instructions
show
defendant
charged
burglary
building
jury
necessarily
find
entry
building
convict
ibid
might
conviction
nongeneric
burglary
statute
qualify
acca
predicate
case
offenses
charged
state
complaints
broader
generic
burglary
course
jury
instructions
might
narrowed
charges
generic
limit
government
nonetheless
urged
district
examine
reports
submitted
police
applications
issuance
complaints
way
telling
whether
shepard
guilty
pleas
went
generic
burglaries
notwithstanding
broader
descriptions
offenses
complaints
descriptions
tracked
expansive
definition
massachusetts
law
concluded
taylor
forbade
investigation
within
taylor
limits
failed
show
shepard
three
generic
burglary
convictions
accordingly
refused
consider
mandatory
minimum
though
sentence
shepard
somewhat
standard
level
sentencing
guidelines
ground
criminal
history
category
guidelines
justice
ample
criminal
record
appeal
first
circuit
following
earlier
decision
harris
vacated
sentence
ruled
complaint
applications
police
reports
may
count
sufficiently
reliable
evidence
determining
whether
defendant
plea
guilty
constitutes
admission
generically
violent
crime
shepard
prior
convictions
remanded
case
district
determine
whether
sufficiently
reliable
evidence
government
defendant
shared
belief
defendant
pleading
guilty
generically
violent
crime
district
declined
impose
mandatory
minimum
even
though
government
supplemented
earlier
submission
police
reports
complaint
applications
two
additional
burglary
convictions
district
judge
noted
account
occurred
prior
plea
hearings
came
affidavit
submitted
shepard
stated
none
details
th
police
reports
ever
mentioned
pleas
reports
never
read
judge
plea
colloquy
time
ever
asked
information
contained
eports
true
supp
mass
shepard
swore
respect
report
admit
truth
information
contained
eport
part
plea
never
admitted
facts
alleged
report
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
based
district
found
government
failed
carry
burden
demonstrate
shepard
pleaded
three
generic
burglaries
appeals
vacated
sentence
observing
shepard
never
seriously
disputed
fact
break
buildings
described
police
reports
complaint
applications
rejected
district
conclusion
government
shown
requisite
predicate
offenses
minimum
sentence
case
remanded
instructions
impose
sentence
granted
certiorari
address
divergent
decisions
courts
appeals
applying
taylor
prior
convictions
stem
guilty
pleas
jury
verdicts
reverse
ii
agree
first
circuit
every
appeals
speak
matter
guilty
pleas
may
establish
acca
predicate
offenses
taylor
reasoning
controls
identification
generic
convictions
following
pleas
well
convictions
verdicts
nongeneric
offenses
see
citing
cases
shepard
wisely
refrains
challenging
position
acca
nowhere
provides
convictions
tried
pleaded
cases
regarded
differently
drops
hint
congress
contemplated
different
standards
establishing
fact
prior
convictions
turning
basis
trial
plea
nothing
effect
suggested
language
imposing
categorical
approach
refers
predicate
offenses
terms
prior
conduct
prior
convictions
element
crimes
taylor
citing
act
legislative
history
reveal
lesser
congressional
preference
categorical
distinct
approach
recognizing
acca
predicates
cases
resolved
plea
taylor
certainly
practical
difficulties
potential
unfairness
factual
approach
daunting
less
pleaded
litigated
cases
finally
nothing
taylor
rationale
limits
prior
jury
convictions
discussion
practical
difficulties
inherent
looking
underlying
circumstances
spoke
specifically
cases
defendant
pleaded
guilty
often
record
underlying
facts
ibid
job
find
right
analogs
applying
taylor
rule
pleaded
cases
taylor
drew
pragmatic
conclusion
best
way
identify
generic
convictions
jury
cases
respecting
congress
adoption
categorical
criterion
avoids
subsequent
evidentiary
enquiries
factual
basis
earlier
conviction
held
generic
burglary
identified
referring
charging
documents
filed
conviction
recorded
judicial
acts
limiting
convictions
generic
category
giving
instruction
jury
however
purport
limit
adequate
judicial
record
evidence
strictly
charges
instructions
discussing
use
documents
example
since
conviction
might
follow
trial
judge
alone
plea
guilty
cases
tried
without
jury
closest
analogs
jury
instructions
judge
formal
rulings
law
findings
fact
pleaded
cases
statement
factual
basis
charge
fed
rule
crim
proc
shown
transcript
plea
colloquy
written
plea
agreement
presented
record
comparable
findings
fact
adopted
defendant
upon
entering
material
pleaded
case
later
generally
tell
whether
plea
necessarily
rested
fact
identifying
burglary
generic
taylor
supra
details
instructions
support
conclusion
jury
case
details
generically
limited
charging
document
sort
case
government
argues
wider
evidentiary
cast
however
going
beyond
conclusive
records
made
used
adjudicating
guilt
looking
documents
submitted
lower
courts
even
prior
charges
argues
considering
police
report
submitted
local
grounds
issuing
complaint
nongeneric
statute
report
alleges
facts
satisfy
elements
generic
statute
report
suffice
show
later
plea
conviction
predicate
offense
acca
reason
concern
unavailable
witnesses
stale
memories
government
points
limited
enquiry
consistent
taylor
underlying
purpose
examining
charging
paper
jury
instructions
endorsed
taylor
determine
nature
offense
petitioner
convicted
rather
determine
actually
brief
government
stresses
three
points
first
says
accommodating
view
evidence
competent
prove
plea
generic
offense
yield
reliable
conclusions
although
records
shepard
pleas
notations
dmit
ted
suff
icient
facts
necessarily
show
admitted
entering
buildings
structures
true
generic
burglary
statute
charge
police
reports
suffice
show
record
admitting
sufficient
facts
plausibly
rested
petitioner
entry
building
second
government
pulls
little
closer
taylor
demand
certainty
identifying
generic
offense
emphasizing
records
prior
convictions
used
case
instance
free
inconsistent
competing
evidence
pivotal
issue
fact
separating
generic
nongeneric
burglary
nothing
record
indicate
petitioner
pleaded
guilty
based
entering
ship
vehicle
occasions
issue
brief
finally
government
supports
call
inclusive
standard
competent
evidence
invoking
virtue
nationwide
application
federal
statute
unaffected
idiosyncrasies
record
keeping
particular
state
bar
review
documents
like
police
reports
complaint
applications
often
make
acca
sentencing
enhancement
hinge
happenstance
state
practices
vagaries
state
prosecutors
charging
practices
brief
opposition
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
point
however
government
position
raises
uncomfortable
implication
every
one
arguments
pressed
favor
enquiry
beyond
taylor
allows
jury
conviction
follows
nongeneric
instructions
therefore
much
menace
taylor
justification
expansive
approach
showing
whether
guilty
plea
admitted
generic
crime
transcript
jury
trial
showed
testimony
building
break
one
say
jury
verdict
rested
finding
effect
trial
record
showed
evidence
felonious
entrance
anything
building
structure
odds
offense
actually
committed
generic
burglary
turf
accountant
dream
significant
vagaries
abbreviated
plea
records
limit
application
acca
significance
less
disputed
predicate
conviction
followed
jury
trial
stenographic
notes
charge
thrown
away
government
position
thus
amounts
call
ease
away
taylor
conclusion
respect
congressional
intent
avoidance
collateral
trials
require
evidence
generic
conviction
confined
records
convicting
approaching
certainty
record
conviction
generic
crime
state
limitation
heart
decision
taylor
government
position
however
sufficient
justification
upsetting
precedent
dealing
issue
statutory
interpretation
see
taylor
considerations
stare
decisis
special
force
area
statutory
interpretation
unlike
context
constitutional
interpretation
legislative
power
implicated
congress
remains
free
alter
done
instance
time
enhanced
even
usual
precedential
force
nearly
years
passed
since
taylor
came
without
action
congress
modify
statute
subject
understanding
allowed
restricted
look
beyond
record
conviction
nongeneric
iii
developments
law
since
taylor
since
first
circuit
decision
harris
provide
reason
adhere
demanding
requirement
sentence
acca
rest
showing
prior
conviction
necessarily
involved
prior
plea
necessarily
admitted
facts
equating
generic
burglary
taylor
indeed
prescient
discussion
problems
follow
allowing
broader
evidentiary
enquiry
sentencing
conclude
review
record
defendant
convicted
nongeneric
burglary
statute
actually
committed
generic
burglary
defendant
challenge
conclusion
abridging
right
jury
trial
taylor
supra
thus
anticipated
rule
later
imposed
sake
preserving
sixth
amendment
right
fact
prior
conviction
sufficient
raise
limit
possible
federal
sentence
must
found
jury
absence
waiver
rights
defendant
jones
see
also
apprendi
new
jersey
government
dismisses
relevance
implementation
jury
right
describing
determination
necessary
apply
acca
involv
ing
assessment
state
already
find
order
find
defendant
guilty
brief
quoting
taylor
supra
simple
problem
state
debatable
nongeneric
state
fact
necessary
show
generic
crime
established
record
conviction
generic
state
judicial
finding
disputed
prior
conviction
made
authority
state
statute
requires
finding
generic
burglary
without
charging
document
narrows
charge
generic
limits
certainty
generic
finding
lies
jury
instructions
bench
trial
findings
rulings
pleaded
case
defendant
admissions
accepted
findings
fact
confirming
factual
basis
valid
plea
particular
pleaded
case
record
silent
generic
element
plea
agreement
recorded
colloquy
shepard
admitted
generic
fact
instead
sentencing
judge
considering
acca
enhancement
government
view
make
disputed
finding
fact
defendant
state
judge
must
understood
factual
basis
prior
plea
dispute
raises
concern
underlying
jones
apprendi
sixth
fourteenth
amendments
guarantee
jury
standing
defendant
power
state
guarantee
jury
finding
disputed
fact
essential
increase
ceiling
potential
sentence
disputed
fact
described
fact
prior
conviction
far
removed
conclusive
significance
prior
judicial
record
much
like
findings
subject
jones
apprendi
say
clearly
authorizes
judge
resolve
dispute
rule
reading
statutes
avoid
serious
risks
unconstitutionality
see
jones
supra
therefore
counsels
us
limit
scope
judicial
factfinding
disputed
generic
character
prior
plea
taylor
constrained
judicial
findings
generic
implication
jury
iv
hold
enquiry
acca
determine
whether
plea
guilty
burglary
defined
nongeneric
statute
necessarily
admitted
elements
generic
offense
limited
terms
charging
document
terms
plea
agreement
transcript
colloquy
judge
defendant
factual
basis
plea
confirmed
defendant
comparable
judicial
record
information
judgment
appeals
reversed
case
remanded
proceedings
ordered
chief
justice
took
part
decision
case
reginald
shepard
petitioner
writ
certiorari
appeals
first
circuit
march
justice
thomas
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
apprendi
new
jersey
progeny
prohibit
judges
mak
ing
finding
raises
defendant
sentence
beyond
sentence
lawfully
imposed
reference
facts
found
jury
admitted
defendant
booker
slip
thomas
dissenting
part
yet
armed
career
criminal
act
supp
ii
permits
case
petitioner
reginald
shepard
pleaded
guilty
felon
possession
firearm
violation
exposed
maximum
sentence
years
federal
sentencing
guidelines
range
months
however
supp
ii
mandated
minimum
sentence
shepard
three
previous
convictions
violent
felony
serious
drug
offense
shepard
never
conceded
prior
convictions
qualify
violent
felonies
serious
drug
offenses
even
appeals
resolved
contested
factual
matter
ordering
district
impose
enhancement
remand
constitutional
infirmity
applied
shepard
makes
today
decision
unnecessary
exercise
nevertheless
plurality
today
refines
rule
taylor
instructs
district
courts
evidence
may
consider
determining
whether
prior
state
convictions
predicate
offenses
taylor
today
decision
thus
explain
lower
courts
conduct
factfinding
according
logic
intervening
precedents
unconstitutional
case
need
refinement
taylor
endures
yet
reconsidered
draws
exception
apprendi
line
cases
judicial
factfinding
concerns
defendant
prior
convictions
see
apprendi
supra
like
taylor
eroded
subsequent
sixth
amendment
jurisprudence
majority
recognizes
wrongly
decided
see
thomas
dissenting
view
broadening
evidence
judges
may
consider
finding
facts
taylor
permitting
sentencing
courts
look
beyond
charging
papers
jury
instructions
plea
agreements
assortment
documents
complaint
applications
police
reports
give
rise
constitutional
doubt
plurality
believes
see
ante
give
rise
constitutional
error
less
limited
factfinding
taylor
rule
permits
reason
well
set
forth
parts
ii
iv
opinion
correctly
declines
broaden
scope
evidence
judges
may
consider
taylor
factfinding
procedure
rejects
gives
rise
constitutional
error
doubt
join
part
iii
opinion
reginald
shepard
petitioner
writ
certiorari
appeals
first
circuit
march
justice
justice
kennedy
justice
breyer
join
dissenting
today
adopts
rule
compelled
statute
precedent
makes
little
sense
practical
matter
substantially
frustrate
congress
scheme
punishing
repeat
violent
offenders
violate
federal
gun
laws
willing
acknowledge
petitioner
prior
state
burglary
convictions
occurred
involved
unpermitted
entries
intent
commit
felonies
refuses
accept
one
additional
commonsense
inference
based
substantial
documentation
without
evidence
contrary
petitioner
punished
entries
buildings
petitioner
reginald
shepard
never
actually
denied
prior
crimes
issue
burglaries
buildings
denied
pleading
guilty
crimes
understood
accepting
punishment
burglarizing
buildings
instead
seeking
benefit
unavailability
certain
old
records
minor
ambiguity
prior
crimes
charging
documents
petitioner
asks
us
foreclose
resort
clear
uncontradicted
background
documents
gave
rise
supported
earlier
convictions
acquiesces
wish
instructs
federal
courts
ignore
narrowest
evidence
regarding
armed
career
criminal
act
defendant
prior
guilty
pleas
respectfully
dissent
armed
career
criminal
act
acca
mandates
minimum
sentence
certain
federal
firearms
violations
defendant
three
prior
convictions
violent
felony
defining
violent
felonies
purpose
congress
specified
term
includes
crime
punishable
one
year
imprisonment
burglary
arson
extortion
involves
use
explosives
otherwise
involves
conduct
presents
serious
potential
risk
physical
injury
another
ii
held
taylor
statute
use
term
burglary
meant
encompass
described
generic
burglary
crime
three
elements
unlawful
unprivileged
entry
remaining
ii
building
structure
iii
intent
commit
crime
left
problem
determine
whether
defendant
past
conviction
qualified
conviction
generic
burglary
formalistic
approach
find
acca
requirement
satisfied
statute
defendant
convicted
one
limited
generic
burglary
taylor
wisely
declined
follow
course
statutes
like
massachusetts
missouri
taylor
use
prosecute
generic
burglary
overbroad
acca
purposes
limited
generic
burglary
also
punish
nongeneric
kind
restricting
sentencing
inquiry
face
statute
frustrated
purposes
acca
allowing
violent
recidivists
convicted
federal
gun
crimes
escape
acca
heightened
punishment
based
solely
fortuity
committed
previous
crimes
instead
taylor
adopted
pragmatic
approach
ante
majority
opinion
every
statute
punishes
certain
set
criminalized
actions
problem
burglary
statutes
purposes
acca
overinclusive
taylor
permitted
federal
go
beyond
mere
fact
conviction
determine
using
sources
whether
defendant
prior
crime
subset
statutory
crime
qualifying
generic
burglary
example
defendant
prior
conviction
occurred
jury
trial
taylor
instructed
federal
review
indictment
information
jury
instructions
earlier
conviction
see
whether
required
jury
find
elements
generic
burglary
order
convict
recognizes
however
taylor
use
one
example
purport
exhaustive
see
ante
see
also
harris
breyer
rather
taylor
left
room
courts
determine
reliable
simple
sources
might
aid
determining
whether
defendant
fact
convicted
generic
burglary
identifies
several
sources
sentencing
judge
may
consult
acca
charging
document
written
plea
agreement
transcript
plea
colloquy
explicit
factual
finding
trial
judge
defendant
assented
ante
expand
list
include
uncontradicted
internally
consistent
parts
record
earlier
conviction
include
two
sources
first
circuit
relied
upon
case
shepard
four
prior
convictions
occurred
guilty
pleas
charges
massachusetts
two
burglary
statutes
statutes
punish
hoever
breaks
enters
building
ship
vessel
vehicle
intent
commit
felony
mass
laws
ch
west
emphasis
added
see
also
criminal
complaints
used
charging
documents
convictions
issue
specify
shepard
offenses
involved
building
instead
closely
copied
inclusive
language
appropriate
statute
complaints
evidence
factual
basis
shepard
guilty
pleas
agree
majority
way
know
whether
convictions
burglarizing
building
government
additional
evidence
convictions
government
applications
police
secured
criminal
complaints
police
reports
attached
applications
documents
decisively
show
shepard
illegal
act
prior
conviction
act
entering
building
moreover
make
inescapable
conclusion
guilty
plea
shepard
understood
admitting
crime
breaking
building
consider
instance
first
burglary
conviction
issue
complaint
conviction
alleged
may
shepard
break
enter
night
time
building
ship
vessel
vehicle
property
jerri
cothran
intent
commit
felony
therein
violation
app
place
offense
alleged
harlem
complaint
contained
cc
majority
us
stop
since
statute
charging
document
name
burglary
building
ship
vessel
vehicle
majority
concludes
way
tell
whether
massachusetts
punished
shepard
transgressing
laws
burglarizing
building
burglarizing
vehicle
ship
vessel
although
majority
also
allow
look
shepard
written
plea
agreement
transcript
plea
proceedings
items
longer
available
shepard
case
since
massachusetts
apparently
seen
little
need
preserve
miscellany
convictions
look
well
additional
portions
record
plea
complaint
application
police
report
complaint
application
lists
statute
describes
abbreviated
form
offense
names
victim
address
contains
reference
number
though
differently
hyphenated
complaint
addition
application
specifies
relevant
property
meaning
goods
stolen
destroyed
etc
cellar
door
police
report
also
names
victim
date
place
offense
contains
reference
number
two
documents
gives
substantially
detail
massachusetts
began
criminal
proceedings
shepard
esponded
radio
call
harlem
progress
arrival
observed
cellar
door
rear
broken
spoke
victim
stated
approx
heard
noises
downstairs
observed
suspect
pantry
three
points
need
made
relationship
complaint
whose
use
majority
finds
completely
unobjectionable
application
police
report
also
consider
first
documents
concern
crime
second
three
documents
entirely
consistent
nothing
casts
doubt
veracity
others
finally
importantly
common
understanding
behind
three
documents
whatever
range
conduct
punishable
state
statute
defendant
prosecuted
burglary
building
see
compelling
inference
plea
complaint
complaint
embodied
events
described
application
police
report
case
file
certainly
evidence
record
contradicting
understanding
notably
throughout
proceedings
shepard
never
denied
four
guilty
pleas
issue
involved
breaking
buildings
denied
contemporaneous
understanding
plea
result
admission
punished
broken
building
federal
sentencing
hearings
shepard
submit
affidavit
prior
convictions
affidavit
carefully
dances
around
key
issues
shepard
actually
run
afoul
law
thought
substance
guilty
plea
rather
affidavit
focuses
judge
said
shepard
hearing
shepard
said
response
even
regard
affidavit
strangely
ambiguous
discussing
first
conviction
instance
affidavit
judge
took
plea
read
police
report
shepard
ask
whether
information
contained
report
true
app
see
also
ibid
admit
truth
information
contained
report
part
plea
never
admitted
facts
alleged
reports
true
affidavit
statements
three
prior
convictions
similar
statements
taken
shepard
denial
ever
asked
ever
admitted
specific
facts
crime
happen
mentioned
police
reports
facts
like
date
place
offense
whether
entered
cellar
door
proceeded
pantry
believe
presume
four
massachusetts
courts
violated
duty
state
law
ensure
factual
basis
shepard
plea
massachusetts
defendant
choice
plead
guilty
alone
support
conviction
defendant
guilt
fact
must
established
commonwealth
delverde
mass
result
even
defendant
admits
crime
open
may
convict
unless
sufficient
facts
record
establish
element
offense
see
also
commonwealth
colon
mass
guilty
plea
requires
admission
facts
blumenson
fisher
kanstroom
massachusetts
criminal
practice
usually
accomplished
recitation
either
grand
jury
minutes
police
reports
defendant
admissions
plea
trial
evidence
also
support
factual
basis
omitted
cf
commonwealth
forde
mass
conviction
based
uncorroborated
confession
rather
must
evidence
crime
real
imaginary
thus
unlikely
shepard
really
intended
affidavit
statement
none
various
facts
found
police
reports
ever
admitted
discussed
presence
guilty
pleas
likely
shepard
attorney
carefully
phrased
affidavit
admit
different
meaning
plea
courts
never
asked
shepard
never
answered
precise
question
police
report
says
true
fail
see
relevant
long
shepard
understood
pleading
guilty
agreeing
punished
building
subject
entire
proceeding
may
scenarios
result
charge
bargaining
instance
due
unexpected
twists
investigation
defendant
guilty
plea
premised
substantially
different
facts
basis
original
police
investigation
case
defendant
might
well
confused
practical
meaning
admission
guilt
cf
taylor
guilty
plea
lesser
nonburglary
offense
result
plea
bargain
seem
unfair
impose
sentence
enhancement
defendant
pleaded
guilty
burglary
claim
circumstances
signs
everyone
involved
prior
plea
judge
prosecutor
defense
lawyer
shepard
understood
plea
shepard
admission
broken
building
police
caught
given
police
report
allegation
shepard
burglarized
building
strains
credulity
beyond
breaking
point
assert
case
shepard
actually
prosecuted
pleaded
guilty
burglarizing
ship
car
lower
surely
right
detect
air
shepard
case
majority
rule
forces
federal
sentencing
feign
agnosticism
clearly
knowable
facts
squared
acca
twin
goals
incapacitating
repeat
violent
offenders
consistently
notwithstanding
peculiarities
state
law
cf
taylor
supra
terms
fundamental
fairness
act
ensure
extent
consistent
prerogatives
defining
offenses
type
conduct
punishable
federal
level
quoting
overscrupulous
regard
formality
leads
absurd
result
also
result
congress
plainly
hoped
avoid
ii
gives
two
principal
reasons
today
ruling
adherence
decision
taylor
constitutional
concerns
defendant
right
jury
trial
first
hardly
convincing
noted
taylor
set
rule
guilty
pleas
list
sources
sentencing
consider
intended
exhaustive
supra
first
circuit
disposition
case
therefore
direct
conflict
taylor
conflict
spirit
taylor
taylor
part
air
ness
defendants
nothing
unfair
great
deal
positively
recognizing
acting
upon
plain
uncontradicted
evidence
defendant
entering
prior
plea
knew
prosecuted
pleading
guilty
burglary
building
taylor
also
sought
avoid
impracticality
featuring
opposing
witnesses
perusing
lengthy
transcripts
prior
proceedings
problem
presents
case
government
proposed
using
small
documentary
record
behind
shepard
pleas
documents
relate
facts
shepard
dispute
shepard
indicated
desire
submit
counterevidence
issue
central
taylor
need
effectuate
congress
categorical
approach
sentencing
recidivist
federal
offenders
approach
responds
reality
defendant
prior
crimes
rather
happenstance
crimes
labeled
state
law
rather
promote
goal
majority
opinion
today
injects
new
element
arbitrariness
acca
defendant
sentence
depend
peculiarities
statutes
particular
use
prosecute
generic
burglary
also
whether
record
retention
policies
happen
preserve
musty
written
plea
agreement
recordings
plea
colloqu
ies
ancillary
convictions
ante
words
respect
critical
issue
majority
rule
consistent
taylor
strongly
suspect
driving
force
behind
today
decision
taylor
rather
evelopments
law
since
taylor
ante
majority
defends
rule
necessary
avoid
result
might
otherwise
unconstitutional
apprendi
new
jersey
related
cases
ante
plurality
opinion
ante
thomas
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
criticized
line
cases
beginning
need
repeat
reasoning
see
dissenting
opinion
ring
arizona
dissenting
opinion
blakely
washington
slip
dissenting
opinion
see
also
jones
kennedy
dissenting
blakely
supra
slip
breyer
dissenting
booker
slip
breyer
dissenting
battle
lost
one
thing
majority
apply
apprendi
rule
within
rule
bounds
quite
another
extend
rule
new
territory
apprendi
succeeding
cases
expressly
consistently
disclaimed
yet
today
decision
reads
apprendi
cast
shadow
possibly
implicating
recidivism
determinations
safe
formalism
see
blakely
supra
slip
fact
prior
conviction
fact
increases
penalty
crime
beyond
prescribed
statutory
maximum
must
submitted
jury
proved
beyond
reasonable
emphasis
added
quoting
apprendi
supra
see
also
booker
supra
slip
opinion
stevens
similar
even
world
understand
today
case
raises
reasonable
constitutional
concern
contrary
case
presents
especially
good
reasons
respecting
congress
long
tradition
treating
recidivism
sentencing
factor
determined
judge
rather
substantive
offense
element
determined
jury
first
shepard
prior
convictions
established
procedures
satisfying
fair
notice
reasonable
doubt
jury
trial
guarantees
jones
supra
second
recidivism
determinations
see
supra
burglary
determination
shepard
case
concerned
extremely
narrow
issue
relevant
facts
seriously
contested
see
supra
discussing
shortcomings
shepard
affidavit
finally
today
hint
extending
apprendi
rule
issue
acca
prior
crimes
surely
favors
future
defendants
shepard
shoes
acca
defendants
future
go
trial
rather
plead
guilty
majority
ruling
effect
invites
government
prosecuting
federal
gun
charge
also
prove
jury
defendant
prior
burglaries
introduction
evidence
defendant
prior
crimes
risks
significant
prejudice
prejudice
likely
especially
strong
acca
cases
relevant
prior
crimes
definition
violent
short
whatever
merits
apprendi
doctrine
doctrine
currently
bear
extended
bear
determinations
defendant
past
crimes
like
acca
predicates
issue
shepard
case
plurality
concern
constitutional
doubt
ante
justice
thomas
concern
constitutional
error
ante
therefore
misplaced
reasons
explained
find
first
circuit
properly
established
applicability
acca
sentence
looking
complaint
applications
police
reports
prior
convictions
concludes
otherwise
respectfully
dissent
footnotes
government
initially
cited
fifth
prior
burglary
conviction
failing
obtain
adequate
documentation
conviction
government
focused
four
although
taylor
involved
prior
burglaries
case
holding
taylor
covered
predicate
acca
offenses
several
courts
appeals
taken
similar
view
approving
use
documents
bonat
maness
smith
per
curiam
construing
sentencing
commission
guidelines
manual
like
government
dissent
allow
district
courts
examine
wider
range
documents
approve
today
proposal
consistent
taylor
government
taylor
clear
enquiry
beyond
statute
charging
document
must
narrowly
restricted
implement
object
statute
avoid
evidentiary
disputes
case
drew
line
allowing
courts
review
documents
showing
jury
necessarily
find
entry
building
convict
see
also
ibid
permitting
sentencing
look
beyond
state
statute
narrow
range
cases
jury
actually
required
find
elements
generic
burglary
say
text
certainly
jury
trials
record
documents
like
issue
never
introduced
trial
uncontradicted
post
opinion
internally
consistent
evidence
came
dissent
presumably
permit
examination
documents
taylor
assuredly
way
reconcile
dissent
approach
taylor
say
taylor
prior
convictions
followed
jury
verdicts
case
prior
conviction
grew
guilty
plea
see
post
taylor
set
rule
guilty
pleas
taylor
suggestion
reasoning
apply
plea
cases
discussion
practical
difficulties
specifically
referred
prior
guilty
pleas
moreover
noted
see
supra
dissent
nowhere
disputes
acca
provides
support
distinction
decline
create
distinction
congress
evidently
desire
draw
taylor
envision
hard
pressed
explain
dissent
charges
decision
may
portend
extension
apprendi
new
jersey
proof
prior
convictions
move
occur
surely
favors
future
defendants
shepard
shoes
post
according
dissent
government
bearing
burden
proving
defendant
prior
burglaries
jury
right
introduce
evidence
burglaries
trial
threaten
severe
prejudice
defendant
future
show
whether
dissent
good
prophesy
dissent
apprehensiveness
resolved
right
dissent
turns
right
apprendi
reach
defendant
feels
risk
prejudice
high
waive
right
jury
decide
questions
prior
convictions